Select Query problem....too urgent

Hi all!
I am running oracle 8i.
I have a table named taxsuamry. I want to arrange the data by exepenses in desc order and after sorting, i want to select first 50 records.
I supplied the follwoing query:
select expenses from taxsuamry
where rownum<51
order by expenses desc;
but it selects 50 records first and then sorts them...i want sorting first and then top 50 rerods from sorted data.
Can anybody help me plz

hello,riaz
If it is optimization kind of problem for your sorting first ...then u can go for following way...
select /*+ index(empid) */ empid from emp where rownum <51 order by empid desc
.........where empid is attribute where u have index on it....
null

Similar Messages

SELECT query takes too much time! Y?

Plz find my SELECT query below:
select w~mandt
wvbeln wposnr wmeins wmatnr wwerks wnetwr
wkwmeng wvrkme wmatwa wcharg w~pstyv
wposar wprodh wgrkor wantlf wkztlf wlprio
wvstel wroute wumvkz wumvkn wabgru wuntto
wawahr werdat werzet wfixmg wprctr wvpmat
wvpwrk wmvgr1 wmvgr2 wmvgr3 wmvgr4 wmvgr5
wbedae wcuobj w~mtvfp
xetenr xwmeng xbmeng xettyp xwepos xabart
x~edatu
xtddat xmbdat xlddat xwadat xabruf xetart
x~ezeit
into table t_vbap
from vbap as w
inner join vbep as x on xvbeln = wvbeln and
xposnr = wposnr and
xmandt = wmandt
where
( ( werdat > pre_dat ) and ( werdat <= w_date ) ) and
( ( ( erdat > pre_dat and erdat < p_syndt ) or
( erdat = p_syndt and erzet <= p_syntm ) ) ) and
w~matnr in s_matnr and
w~pstyv in s_itmcat and
w~lfrel in s_lfrel and
w~abgru = ' ' and
w~kwmeng > 0 and
w~mtvfp in w_mtvfp and
x~ettyp in w_ettyp and
x~bdart in s_req_tp and
x~plart in s_pln_tp and
x~etart in s_etart and
x~abart in s_abart and
( ( xlifsp in s_lifsp ) or ( xlifsp = ' ' ) ).
The problem: It takes too much time while executing this statement.
Could anybody change this statement and help me out to reduce the DB Access time?
Thx

Ways of Performance Tuning
1.     Selection Criteria
2.     Select Statements
     Select Queries
     SQL Interface
     Aggregate Functions
     For all Entries
Select Over more than one internal table
Selection Criteria
1.     Restrict the data to the selection criteria itself, rather than filtering it out using the ABAP code using CHECK statement.
2.     Select with selection list.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA.
CHECK: SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
         SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below which avoids CHECK, selects with selection list
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE BOOKID FROM SBOOK INTO TABLE T_SBOOK
WHERE SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
              SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
Select Statements   Select Queries
1.     Avoid nested selects
SELECT * FROM EKKO INTO EKKO_WA.
SELECT * FROM EKAN INTO EKAN_WA
      WHERE EBELN = EKKO_WA-EBELN.
ENDSELECT.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below.
SELECT PF1 PF2 FF3 FF4 INTO TABLE ITAB
    FROM EKKO AS P INNER JOIN EKAN AS F
      ON PEBELN = FEBELN.
Note: A simple SELECT loop is a single database access whose result is passed to the ABAP program line by line. Nested SELECT loops mean that the number of accesses in the inner loop is multiplied by the number of accesses in the outer loop. One should therefore use nested SELECT loops only if the selection in the outer loop contains very few lines or the outer loop is a SELECT SINGLE statement.
2.     Select all the records in a single shot using into table clause of select statement rather than to use Append statements.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA.
CHECK: SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
         SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below which avoids CHECK, selects with selection list and puts the data in one shot using into table
SELECT CARRID CONNID FLDATE BOOKID FROM SBOOK INTO TABLE T_SBOOK
WHERE SBOOK_WA-CARRID = 'LH' AND
              SBOOK_WA-CONNID = '0400'.
3.     When a base table has multiple indices, the where clause should be in the order of the index, either a primary or a secondary index.
To choose an index, the optimizer checks the field names specified in the where clause and then uses an index that has the same order of the fields. In certain scenarios, it is advisable to check whether a new index can speed up the performance of a program. This will come handy in programs that access data from the finance tables.
4.     For testing existence, use Select.. Up to 1 rows statement instead of a Select-Endselect-loop with an Exit.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA
UP TO 1 ROWS
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'.
ENDSELECT.
The above code is more optimized as compared to the code mentioned below for testing existence of a record.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK INTO SBOOK_WA
    WHERE CARRID = 'LH'.
EXIT.
ENDSELECT.
5.     Use Select Single if all primary key fields are supplied in the Where condition .
If all primary key fields are supplied in the Where conditions you can even use Select Single.
Select Single requires one communication with the database system, whereas Select-Endselect needs two.
Select Statements SQL Interface
1.     Use column updates instead of single-row updates
to update your database tables.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT INTO SFLIGHT_WA.
SFLIGHT_WA-SEATSOCC =
    SFLIGHT_WA-SEATSOCC - 1.
UPDATE SFLIGHT FROM SFLIGHT_WA.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
UPDATE SFLIGHT
       SET SEATSOCC = SEATSOCC - 1.
2.     For all frequently used Select statements, try to use an index.
SELECT * FROM SBOOK CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO SBOOK_WA
WHERE CARRID = 'LH'
    AND CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
SELECT * FROM SBOOK CLIENT SPECIFIED INTO SBOOK_WA
WHERE MANDT IN ( SELECT MANDT FROM T000 )
    AND CARRID = 'LH'
    AND CONNID = '0400'.
ENDSELECT.
3.     Using buffered tables improves the performance considerably.
Bypassing the buffer increases the network considerably
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T100 INTO T100_WA
BYPASSING BUFFER
WHERE     SPRSL = 'D'
        AND ARBGB = '00'
        AND MSGNR = '999'.
The above mentioned code can be more optimized by using the following code
SELECT SINGLE * FROM T100 INTO T100_WA
WHERE     SPRSL = 'D'
        AND ARBGB = '00'
        AND MSGNR = '999'.
Select Statements Aggregate Functions
     If you want to find the maximum, minimum, sum and average value or the count of a database column, use a select list with aggregate functions instead of computing the aggregates yourself.
Some of the Aggregate functions allowed in SAP are MAX, MIN, AVG, SUM, COUNT, COUNT( * )
Consider the following extract.
            Maxno = 0.
            Select * from zflight where airln = LF and cntry = IN.
             Check zflight-fligh > maxno.
             Maxno = zflight-fligh.
            Endselect.
The above mentioned code can be much more optimized by using the following code.
Select max( fligh ) from zflight into maxno where airln = LF and cntry = IN.
Select Statements For All Entries
     The for all entries creates a where clause, where all the entries in the driver table are combined with OR. If the number of entries in the driver table is larger than rsdb/max_blocking_factor, several similar SQL statements are executed to limit the length of the WHERE clause.
     The plus
     Large amount of data
     Mixing processing and reading of data
     Fast internal reprocessing of data
     Fast
     The Minus
     Difficult to program/understand
     Memory could be critical (use FREE or PACKAGE size)
Points to be must considered FOR ALL ENTRIES
     Check that data is present in the driver table
     Sorting the driver table
     Removing duplicates from the driver table
Consider the following piece of extract
          Loop at int_cntry.
Select single * from zfligh into int_fligh
where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Append int_fligh.
                      Endloop.
The above mentioned can be more optimized by using the following code.
Sort int_cntry by cntry.
Delete adjacent duplicates from int_cntry.
If NOT int_cntry[] is INITIAL.
            Select * from zfligh appending table int_fligh
            For all entries in int_cntry
            Where cntry = int_cntry-cntry.
Endif.
Select Statements Select Over more than one Internal table
1.     Its better to use a views instead of nested Select statements.
SELECT * FROM DD01L INTO DD01L_WA
WHERE DOMNAME LIKE 'CHAR%'
        AND AS4LOCAL = 'A'.
SELECT SINGLE * FROM DD01T INTO DD01T_WA
    WHERE   DOMNAME    = DD01L_WA-DOMNAME
        AND AS4LOCAL   = 'A'
        AND AS4VERS    = DD01L_WA-AS4VERS
        AND DDLANGUAGE = SY-LANGU.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be more optimized by extracting all the data from view DD01V_WA
SELECT * FROM DD01V INTO DD01V_WA
WHERE DOMNAME LIKE 'CHAR%'
        AND DDLANGUAGE = SY-LANGU.
ENDSELECT
2.     To read data from several logically connected tables use a join instead of nested Select statements. Joins are preferred only if all the primary key are available in WHERE clause for the tables that are joined. If the primary keys are not provided in join the Joining of tables itself takes time.
SELECT * FROM EKKO INTO EKKO_WA.
SELECT * FROM EKAN INTO EKAN_WA
      WHERE EBELN = EKKO_WA-EBELN.
ENDSELECT.
ENDSELECT.
The above code can be much more optimized by the code written below.
SELECT PF1 PF2 FF3 FF4 INTO TABLE ITAB
    FROM EKKO AS P INNER JOIN EKAN AS F
      ON PEBELN = FEBELN.
3.     Instead of using nested Select loops it is often better to use subqueries.
SELECT * FROM SPFLI
INTO TABLE T_SPFLI
WHERE CITYFROM = 'FRANKFURT'
    AND CITYTO = 'NEW YORK'.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT AS F
    INTO SFLIGHT_WA
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN T_SPFLI
    WHERE SEATSOCC < F~SEATSMAX
      AND CARRID = T_SPFLI-CARRID
      AND CONNID = T_SPFLI-CONNID
      AND FLDATE BETWEEN '19990101' AND '19990331'.
ENDSELECT.
The above mentioned code can be even more optimized by using subqueries instead of for all entries.
SELECT * FROM SFLIGHT AS F INTO SFLIGHT_WA
    WHERE SEATSOCC < F~SEATSMAX
      AND EXISTS ( SELECT * FROM SPFLI
                     WHERE CARRID = F~CARRID
                       AND CONNID = F~CONNID
                       AND CITYFROM = 'FRANKFURT'
                       AND CITYTO = 'NEW YORK' )
      AND FLDATE BETWEEN '19990101' AND '19990331'.
ENDSELECT.
1.     Table operations should be done using explicit work areas rather than via header lines.
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X BINARY SEARCH.
IS MUCH FASTER THAN USING
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X'.
If TAB has n entries, linear search runs in O( n ) time, whereas binary search takes only O( log2( n ) ).
2.     Always try to use binary search instead of linear search. But dont forget to sort your internal table before that.
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY K = 'X'. IS FASTER THAN USING
READ TABLE ITAB INTO WA WITH KEY (NAME) = 'X'.
3.     A dynamic key access is slower than a static one, since the key specification must be evaluated at runtime.
4.     A binary search using secondary index takes considerably less time.
5.     LOOP ... WHERE is faster than LOOP/CHECK because LOOP ... WHERE evaluates the specified condition internally.
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA WHERE K = 'X'.
ENDLOOP.
The above code is much faster than using
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA.
CHECK WA-K = 'X'.
ENDLOOP.
6.     Modifying selected components using MODIFY itab TRANSPORTING f1 f2.. accelerates the task of updating a line of an internal table.
WA-DATE = SY-DATUM.
MODIFY ITAB FROM WA INDEX 1 TRANSPORTING DATE.
The above code is more optimized as compared to
WA-DATE = SY-DATUM.
MODIFY ITAB FROM WA INDEX 1.
7.     Accessing the table entries directly in a "LOOP ... ASSIGNING ..." accelerates the task of updating a set of lines of an internal table considerably
Modifying selected components only makes the program faster as compared to Modifying all lines completely.
e.g,
LOOP AT ITAB ASSIGNING <WA>.
I = SY-TABIX MOD 2.
IF I = 0.
    <WA>-FLAG = 'X'.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The above code works faster as compared to
LOOP AT ITAB INTO WA.
I = SY-TABIX MOD 2.
IF I = 0.
    WA-FLAG = 'X'.
    MODIFY ITAB FROM WA.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
8.    If collect semantics is required, it is always better to use to COLLECT rather than READ BINARY and then ADD.
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA1.
READ TABLE ITAB2 INTO WA2 WITH KEY K = WA1-K BINARY SEARCH.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
    ADD: WA1-VAL1 TO WA2-VAL1,
         WA1-VAL2 TO WA2-VAL2.
    MODIFY ITAB2 FROM WA2 INDEX SY-TABIX TRANSPORTING VAL1 VAL2.
ELSE.
    INSERT WA1 INTO ITAB2 INDEX SY-TABIX.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
The above code uses BINARY SEARCH for collect semantics. READ BINARY runs in O( log2(n) ) time. The above piece of code can be more optimized by
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
COLLECT WA INTO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
SORT ITAB2 BY K.
COLLECT, however, uses a hash algorithm and is therefore independent
of the number of entries (i.e. O(1)) .
9.    "APPEND LINES OF itab1 TO itab2" accelerates the task of appending a table to another table considerably as compared to LOOP-APPEND-ENDLOOP.
APPEND LINES OF ITAB1 TO ITAB2.
This is more optimized as compared to
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
APPEND WA TO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
10.   DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES accelerates the task of deleting duplicate entries considerably as compared to READ-LOOP-DELETE-ENDLOOP.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM ITAB COMPARING K.
This is much more optimized as compared to
READ TABLE ITAB INDEX 1 INTO PREV_LINE.
LOOP AT ITAB FROM 2 INTO WA.
IF WA = PREV_LINE.
    DELETE ITAB.
ELSE.
    PREV_LINE = WA.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
11.   "DELETE itab FROM ... TO ..." accelerates the task of deleting a sequence of lines considerably as compared to DO -DELETE-ENDDO.
DELETE ITAB FROM 450 TO 550.
This is much more optimized as compared to
DO 101 TIMES.
DELETE ITAB INDEX 450.
ENDDO.
12.   Copying internal tables by using ITAB2[ ] = ITAB1[ ] as compared to LOOP-APPEND-ENDLOOP.
ITAB2[] = ITAB1[].
This is much more optimized as compared to
REFRESH ITAB2.
LOOP AT ITAB1 INTO WA.
APPEND WA TO ITAB2.
ENDLOOP.
13.   Specify the sort key as restrictively as possible to run the program faster.
SORT ITAB BY K. makes the program runs faster as compared to SORT ITAB.
Internal Tables         contd
Hashed and Sorted tables
1.     For single read access hashed tables are more optimized as compared to sorted tables.
2.      For partial sequential access sorted tables are more optimized as compared to hashed tables
Hashed And Sorted Tables
Point # 1
Consider the following example where HTAB is a hashed table and STAB is a sorted table
DO 250 TIMES.
N = 4 * SY-INDEX.
READ TABLE HTAB INTO WA WITH TABLE KEY K = N.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
This runs faster for single read access as compared to the following same code for sorted table
DO 250 TIMES.
N = 4 * SY-INDEX.
READ TABLE STAB INTO WA WITH TABLE KEY K = N.
IF SY-SUBRC = 0.
ENDIF.
ENDDO.
Point # 2
Similarly for Partial Sequential access the STAB runs faster as compared to HTAB
LOOP AT STAB INTO WA WHERE K = SUBKEY.
ENDLOOP.
This runs faster as compared to
LOOP AT HTAB INTO WA WHERE K = SUBKEY.
ENDLOOP.

Select Query Problem

Hi Experts,
I am having a select query in which I am using a variable in the where condition but it is giving error. Please suggest how to use variable in the select query.
The query I am using is a s below.
select * from zexc_rec into table it_ZEXC_REC
      where
       LIFNR in S_LIFNR and
      DOCNO in S_DOCNO and
      DOCTYP in doc_typ and
      DATE1 in S_DATE1 and
      MATNR in S_MATNR.
Here doc_typ is a variable.
Thanks.

Rahul,
use RANGES type variable instead of variable . It acts as a select-options variable. Thn use this variable in SELECT query with IN.
Eg :
RANGES r_t510 FOR t510-lgart.
    r_t510-low = '1600'.
    APPEND r_t510.
    r_t510-low = '3190'.
    APPEND r_t510.
Note : can be use SIGN, OPTIONS properties too in RANGES type.
More deatils go through on HELP of RANGES
Rgds,
Ranjith

Select query problem in JDBC sender adapter

Hello Experts,
We have a problem with PI sender adapter that PI has started to miss records in database some database records are missing and we are using the below selet query :
SELECT * FROM [database name].[dbo].[Material_Movement] WHERE [Process_Order_Number] = (Select TOP 1 [Process_Order_Number] FROM [database name].[dbo].[Material_Movement] WHERE ([PI_Read_Date] IS NULL AND [Movement_Type] = (SELECT TOP 1 [Movement_Type] FROM [database name].[dbo].[Material_Movement] WHERE [Transaction_Code] = 'xyz' AND [PI_Read_Date] IS NULL ORDER BY Created_Date ASC))) AND [Transaction_Code] = 'xyz' AND [Movement_Type] = (SELECT TOP 1 [Movement_Type] FROM [database name].[dbo].[Material_Movement] WHERE [Transaction_Code] = 'xyz' AND [PI_Read_Date] IS NULL ORDER BY Created_Date ASC) AND [PI_Read_Date] IS NULL ORDER BY [Transaction_ID] ASC
I am weak in select query could you please check and suggest how the query can be modified to avoid this issue .
Thanks,
Somenath

Hi ,
After looking into These Query .. I found ...
Your Query Will run such Kind of scenario ..
1.)   Movement Type will be fetched from from below Query
        SELECT TOP 1 Movement_Type
        FROM database name.dbo.Material_Movement
        WHERE Transaction_Code = 'xyz'
       AND PI_Read_Date IS NULL
        ORDER BY Created_Date ASC
2.) on the basis of abovr fetched moment code . your Query will fetch 1 Process Order number
Select TOP 1 Process_Order_Number
FROM database name.dbo.Material_Movement
WHERE ( PI_Read_Date IS NULL
              AND Movement_Type = Moment Type will be same as 1.
3.)
After Getting 1 and 2 . Query will fetch Data from table " dbo.Material_Movement "
On the basis of ..
Movement_Type = value from 1.
Process_order_type = value from 2.
Transaction_Code = 'xyz'
ORDER BY Transaction_ID ASC
So check Missed record Fullfill this Condition or not ....................
If not ... You will get why they are not picked by your given Query ...........
Hope it helps ..
regards
Prabhat Sharma.

Select query taking too much time to fetch data from pool table a005

Dear all,
I am using 2 pool table a005 and a006 in my program. I am using select query to fetch data from these table. i.e. example is mentioned below.
select * from a005 into table t_a005 for all entries in it_itab
                   where vkorg in s_vkorg
                   and     matnr in s_matnr
                   and     aplp   in s_aplp
                   and     kmunh = it_itab-kmunh.
here i can't create index also as tables are pool table...If there is any solutions , than please help me for same..
Thanks ,

it would be helpful to know what other fields are in the internal table you are using for the FOR ALL ENTRIES.
In general, you should code the order of your fields in the select in the same order as they appear in the database. If you do not have the top key field, then the entire database is read. If it's large then it's going to take a lot of time. The more key fields from the beginning of the structure that you can supply at faster the retrieval.
Regards,
Brent

Multiple Schema select Query problem

Hi everyone,
when I tried to execute a select query as following,
select A.field1, B.field2 from S1.table1 A, S2.table2 B
in a session bean, it gives an exception as follows
" An illegal attempt to use multiple resources that have only one-phase capability has occurred within a global transaction"
Can anyone pls help me in this regard.
Thanking you
D. Suresh Kumar

This is the query i thought of executing
SELECT * FROM SCH2.AP_TRANSACTION_EPS A, TRANSACTION_TYPES B WHERE C_FUND_CODE = '" + fundCode + "'AND D_TRADE_DATE = to_date('" + date + "','yyyy-mm-dd') AND A.C_TRANS_CODE = B.C_TRANS_CODE " + " AND B.C_TRANS_TYPE = '" + transType + "' ";
where "fundCode", "date","transType" are java variables.
The error message is
[8/1/03 12:38:49:688 IST] 491a6a5 TransactionIm E WTRN0062E: An illegal attempt to use multiple resources that have only one-phase capability has occurred within a global transaction.
[8/1/03 12:38:49:750 IST] 491a6a5 ConnectO A CONM6014I: Received exception (IllegalStateException) in method (enlist). Issuing new exception (IllegalTransactionStateException). The original exception's stack trace was: java.lang.IllegalStateException
Thanking you

Sql select query problem

hi friends,
i've a view called "risk_efforts" with fields user_id,user_name,wknd_dt,week_day,prod_efforts,unprod_efforts.
Name Type
ROW_ID NUMBER
USER_ID VARCHAR2(14)
USER_NAME VARCHAR2(50)
WKND_DT VARCHAR2(8)
WEEK_DAY VARCHAR2(250)
PROD_EFFORTS NUMBER
UNPROD_EFFORTS NUMBER
data is like this:
when there is some data in prod_efforts, unprod_efforts will be null
when there is some data in unprod_efforts, prod_efforts will be null
for example:
USER_ID     USER_NAME     WKND_DT     WEEK_DAY     PROD_EFFORTS     UNPROD_EFFORTS
G666999     GTest     20100403     TUE     null 3
G666999     GTest     20100403     TUE     14     null
now i want to combine these 2 rows into 1 row i.e o/p should be like this
USER_ID     USER_NAME     WKND_DT     WEEK_DAY     PROD_EFFORTS     UNPROD_EFFORTS
G666999     GTest     20100403     TUE     14 3
i've tried all combinations but couldn't get the query. Please help me with the exact SQL select query.
thanks,
Girish

Welcome to the forum.
First read this:
Urgency in online postings
Secondly, it's always helpful to provide the following:
1. Oracle version (SELECT * FROM V$VERSION)
2. Sample data in the form of CREATE / INSERT statements.
3. Expected output
4. Explanation of expected output (A.K.A. "business logic")
5. Use \ tags for #2 and #3. See FAQ (Link on top right side) for details.
You have provided #3 and #4. However with no usable form of sample data forum members will often not respond as quickly as they could if you provided #2.
I'm just wagering a guess here but what about this:SELECT ROW_ID
, USER_ID
, WKND_DT
, WEEK_DAY
, MAX(PROD_EFFORTS) AS PROD_EFFORTS
, MAX(UNPROD_EFFORTS) AS UNPROD_EFFORTS
FROM RISK_EFFORTS
GROUP BY ROW_ID
, USER_ID
, WKND_DT
, WEEK_DAY

SELECT query - problem with SORT

Hi,
Same select query behaves different way on development and quality server
on Development it returns unsorted and Quality returns sorted
it can be resolved by SORT but why does it behave differently
Do you know what is setting in database
thanks

From F1 on SELECT:
Orders the records in a SELECT statement. Without the ORDER-BY clause, the order
in which the selected lines are supplied is undefined. This means that two similar SELECT
statements may produce lines in a different order.
Rob

Select query on CRMD_ORDERADM_H (urgent)

Hi All,
      I want to retrieve data from CRMD_ORDERADM_H that would fetch all transactions created on the same day before 6pm.
I also want another internal table that would contain transaction created on the same day between 6pm and 11pm.
How do I write a SELECT query for the same ????
Regards,
Ashish

Hi
You can try it out useing the programme below for your requirement.
data: it_all_orders1 type standard table of CRMD_ORDERADM_H with header line,
      it_all_orders2 type standard table of CRMD_ORDERADM_H with header line.
data: to_day type SYDATUM,
      time_stamp1 type COMT_CREATED_AT_USR,
      time_stamp2 type COMT_CREATED_AT_USR,
      time_stamp3 type COMT_CREATED_AT_USR.
to-day = sy-datum.
concatenate to-day(2) '.' to-day2(3) '.' to-day5(3) '.' '180.000' into time_stamp1.
concatenate to-day(2) '.' to-day2(3) '.' to-day5(3) '.' '180.000' into time_stamp2.
concatenate to-day(2) '.' to-day2(3) '.' to-day5(3) '.' '230.000' into time_stamp3.
select * from CRMD_ORDERADM_H
         into corresponding fields of table
         it_all_orders1
         where
         CREATED_AT eq time_stamp1.
select * from CRMD_ORDERADM_H
         into corresponding fields of table
         it_all_orders2
         where
         CREATED_AT between
             time_stamp2
         and
             time_stamp3.
Reward points if helpful
Dinaker vikas

Urgent Sql Query Problem - -Very Urgent

Hi Guys,
I need a urgent solution for a problem.I am
using the following query
select ename from emp where deptno =10
Now I will declare a bind variable and if user passes 'A'
then the query will run as it is and if he passes B
then it should run the above query with this additional clause -> birthdate - hiredate >15.
Please can any one help its very urgent

Assuming that you have a birthdate column in your emp table, the following will do what you are asking for:
VARIABLE bind_var VARCHAR2(1)
EXECUTE :bind_var := '&bind_variable'
SELECT ename FROM
(SELECT 'A' AS selection, ename FROM emp WHERE deptno = 10
UNION ALL
SELECT 'B' AS selection, ename FROM emp WHERE deptno = 10 AND birthdate - hiredate > 15)
WHERE selection = :bind_var
However, the clause "birthdate - hiredate > 15" will only retrieve rows for employees who were born more than 15 days after they were hired. I doubt that this is what you really want, since this is impossible.

Abap select query problem

This report will take delivery document number and delivery date from user and fetches details from delivery table and fetches
corresponding sales order details and billing details and displays sales order details with ALV list.
<< Please only post the relevant portions of your code >>
i just want to know that is this way of fetching the data into internal table okay ?are there any better ways of fetching the data into the internal table ? why is it looping in work area of lips, why not in likp?
(plz dont use field-symbols or oo abap or macros) I WANT TO USE PLAIN AND SIMPLE ABAP STATEMENTS LIKE ABOVE..
By using "vbeln type lips-vbeln" are we refering to the field or data element? plz suggest.
P.S.           [my approach was to inner join likp and lips into itab(my internal table).
select data from kna1, vbak,vbap,vbrp into respective internal tables like it_kna1,it_vbak etc.
then using individual loops into the tables, i would use read table to insert data into itab(my final internal table) plz suggest which method wud be more efficient? ]
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Jun 8, 2009 11:54 AM

ok i am posting the select queries once again.
i want to know why are we looping in t_lips and why not t_likp? bcoz tlikp is the header table, if we loop thru it and then read the rest tables then what will be the problem? plz clarify with examples._
[my idea was to loop at t_likp then read t_lips.append the lips data into t_order(main internal table).then do read table on t_kna1,t_vbap etc indexing t_order. so plz suggest whether my approach was write or wrong?if wrong why?plz site any other ways of doing this query.
types: begin of ty_vbap,
       vbeln type vbap-vbeln,
       posnr type vbap-posnr, .....
does the declaration statement in types refer to tables or data elements? what is the difference if we declare it like:
   types: begin of ty_vbap,
       vbeln type vbeln,
       posnr type posnr, .....
select-options:
s_deldoc FOR likp-vbeln, " Delivery
s_dldate FOR likp-lfdat. " Delivery Date
Get delivery document number,delivery date,customer number from
delivery header table
SELECT vbeln " Delivery
lfdat " Delivery Date
kunnr " Customer Number 1
FROM likp
INTO TABLE t_likp
WHERE vbeln IN s_deldoc
AND lfdat IN s_dldate.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
Get Customer name for customer numbers from Customer master table
SELECT kunnr " Customer Number 1
name1 " Name 1
FROM kna1
INTO TABLE t_kna1
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_likp
WHERE kunnr EQ t_likp-kunnr.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
Get delivery item number,sales document number,sales item number,
delivery quantity from delivery item table
SELECT vbeln " Delivery
posnr " Delivery Item
vgbel " Document number of
" reference document
vgpos " Item number of reference item
lfimg " Actual quantity delivered
vrkme " Sales unit
FROM lips
INTO TABLE t_lips
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_likp
WHERE vbeln EQ t_likp-vbeln.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
Get sales document number,item number,material,material description,
ordered quantity from sales item table
SELECT vbeln " Sales Document
posnr " Sales Document Item
matnr " Material Number
arktx " Short text for sales order
" item
kwmeng " Cumulative Order Quantity
vrkme " Sales unit
FROM vbap
INTO TABLE t_vbap
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_lips
WHERE vbeln EQ t_lips-vgbel
AND posnr EQ t_lips-vgpos.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
Get sales document number ,created date,purchase order number from
sales header table
SELECT vbeln " Sales Document
erdat " Date on Which Record Was" Created
aufnr " Order Number
FROM vbak
INTO TABLE t_vbak
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_lips
WHERE vbeln EQ t_lips-vgbel.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.* Get billing document number,billing item,reference delivery document
number,delivery item number,billing item from billing item table
SELECT vbeln " Billing Document
posnr " Billing item
vgbel " Document number of the
" reference document
vgpos " Item number of the" reference" item
fklmg " Billing quantity in" stockkeeping unit
vrkme " Sales unit
FROM vbrp
INTO TABLE t_vbrp
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_lips
WHERE vgbel EQ t_lips-vbeln
AND vgpos EQ t_lips-posnr.
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ELSE.
Display message if records are not found for entered values
MESSAGE S000.
EXIT.
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
Looping Delivery item internal table to assign values to order
internal table
LOOP AT t_lips INTO fs_lips.
Get delivery date and customer number for delivery document number
from delivery header internal table
READ TABLE t_likp WITH KEY vbeln = fs_lips-vbeln
INTO fs_likp.
Get customer name for customer number from customer master internal
table
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
READ TABLE t_kna1 WITH KEY kunnr = fs_likp-kunnr
INTO fs_kna1.
Get sales document number,item number,ordered quantity for delivery
document number,item number from sales item internal table
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
READ TABLE t_vbap WITH KEY vbeln = fs_lips-vgbel
posnr = fs_lips-vgpos INTO fs_vbap.
Get goods issue date and purchase order number for sales document
number from sales header internal table
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
READ TABLE t_vbak WITH KEY vbeln = fs_vbap-vbeln INTO fs_vbak.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
Get billing document number,billing item,billing quantity for delivery
document number,delivery item number from billing item internal table
READ TABLE t_vbrp WITH KEY vgbel = fs_lips-vbeln
vgpos = fs_lips-posnr INTO fs_vbrp.
Assign sales,delivery,billing fields into respective fields of sales
order internal table
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
fs_order-vbeln = fs_vbap-vbeln.
fs_order-posnr = fs_vbap-posnr.
fs_order-erdat = fs_vbak-erdat.
fs_order-kunnr = fs_likp-kunnr.
fs_order-name1 = fs_kna1-name1.
fs_order-aufnr = fs_vbak-aufnr.
fs_order-matnr = fs_vbap-matnr.
fs_order-arktx = fs_vbap-arktx.
fs_order-kwmeng = fs_vbap-kwmeng.
fs_order-vrkme = fs_vbap-vrkme.
fs_order-vbeln1 = fs_lips-vbeln.
fs_order-posnr1 = fs_lips-posnr.
fs_order-lfimg = fs_lips-lfimg.
fs_order-vrkme1 = fs_lips-vrkme.
fs_order-vbeln2 = fs_vbrp-vbeln.
fs_order-posnr2 = fs_vbrp-posnr.
fs_order-fklmg = fs_vbrp-fklmg.
fs_order-vrkme2 = fs_vbrp-vrkme.
APPEND fs_order TO t_order.
CLEAR fs_order.
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDIF. " IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0
ENDLOOP. " LOOP AT T_LIPS INTO FS_LIPS

Reg select query problem

hi all,
hope all r doing fine?
anyway i have a query which is mentioned below:-
select field1,.....fieldn
         from <dbtable1>
         into corresponding fields of table itab
         where <condition>.
select field1,...fieldn
          from <dbtable2>
         appending corresponding fields of table itab
        where <condition>.
the above two select stmts retrieve same set of fields from two different database tables into same internal table itab..
now my question is ...........is any other way to change 2nd select statement without using appending correspondin fields
but the functionality should remain the same as it is after changing..................
bcos appending corresponding is causing performance problem in data retrieval.
thanx alot in advance.
for sure points will be given for all the helpful answers
Jack

Hi,
You can use like that:
select field1,.....fieldn
from <dbtable1>
into corresponding fields of table itab1
where <condition>.
select field1,...fieldn
from <dbtable2>
appending corresponding fields of table itab2
where <condition>.
now u use:
loop at itab2 into w_itab2.
read table itab1 into w_itab1 with key w_itab1-<primary field> = w_itab2-<Primary field>.
if sy-subrc = 0.
append w_final into i_final.
else continue.
endif.
endloop.
*i_final table having all data ( i.e itab2 & itab1 data)

Select Query Problem-need help

hi,
Help me out from this problem.
Actually i have a table and the data in it as follows:
Department Name Job Name
Accounts Sr. Accountant
Accounts Jr. Accountant
Accounts Cleark
But i dont want the repeated Department Name.. and i want the same output as follows.
Department Name Job Name
Accounts Sr. Accountant
Jr. Accountant
Cleark
Without using sql reports and Sql Plus additional commands.
The same output should come from a sql query only.
Thanks in Advance
Md Anwer Ali

I shouldn't try to code before I have had at least three cups of coffee. The actual answer is:
select decode(department,lag(department) over (order by department),null,department)
, job
from departments
order by department.
I ran this:
select decode(job,lag(job) over (order by job),null,job)
, ename
from emp
order by job
and got this result:
SQL> /
DECODE(JO ENAME
ANALYST SCOTT
FORD
CLERK SMITH
ADAMS
MILLER
JAMES
MANAGER JONES
CLARK
BLAKE
PRESIDENT KING
SALESMAN ALLEN
MARTIN
TURNER
WARD
14 rows selected.

Query Problem..Urgent

I have two views created from the same table based on two conditions for some quantities.
I need to create another view based on rhese and am using a group by function in here.SO i am grouping by month and product. now based on these views and combine the data once again but i have a problem here.
in the where cause i can specify the a.product =b.product(+) but i want to include everything from both the views.
SEcondly not only items should match but so should the months in there so a.month=b.month(+) but if i have months in a which are not in b then they will not show up.
I want all the data to show up
Eg. View A
product qtyin month
computer 200 jan-2003
computer 300 feb-2003
computer 100 feb-2003
monitor 300 jan-2003
monitor 200 jan-2003
cpu 400 feb 2003
ND VIEW B
product qtyout month
computer 300 jan-2003
computer 150 jan-2003
computer 200 feb-2003
computer 300 mar-2003
monitor 200 jan-2003
fans 100 jan-2003
VIEW C
PRODUCT QTYIN QTYOUT MONTH
COMPUTER 200 450 JAN-2003
COMPUTER 400 200 FEB-2003
COMPUTER 300 MAR-2003
MONITOR 500 200 JAN-2003
CPU 400 FEB-2003
FANS 100 JAN-2003
I hope someone can help me with this...........
Best Regards,
Ashish Nanda

select PRODUCT, SUM(QTYIN), SUM(QTYOUT), MONTH_DT
FROM (SELECT PRODUCT, QTYIN, 0 QTYOUT, MONTH_DT FROM VIEWA
       UNION
       SELECT PRODUCT, 0, QTYOUT, MONTH_DT FROM VIEWB)
GROUP BY PRODUCT, MONTH_DT;
PRODUCT              SUM(QTYIN) SUM(QTYOUT) MONTH_DT
COMPUTER                    400         200 FEB-2003
COMPUTER                    200         450 JAN-2003
COMPUTER                      0         300 MAR-2003
CPU                         400           0 FEB 2003
FANS                          0         100 JAN-2003
MONITOR                     500         200 JAN-2003

Selection query problem

hi all.....
i want to setct some data from table vbrp ,vbrk and vbfa .
on selection screen i have vbrk-vbeln and vbfa-erdat i hav written one code for tht but thts not working can nybdy plz help me in this..
parameter : p_vbeln type vbrk-vbeln ,
            p_erdat type vbfa-erdat .
*--start of selection events
start-of-selection.
*--SELECTING THE DATA FROM DATABASE INTO INTERNAL TABLE
SELECT v1~vbeln AS vbeln
        v1~kunag AS kunag
        v1~vkorg AS vkorg
        v1~netwr AS netwr
        v2~ntgew AS ntgew
        v2~matnr AS matnr
        v3~erdat AS erdat
        INTO CORRESPONDING fields of table it_data1
    FROM vbrk AS v1
    INNER JOIN vbrp AS v2
       ON v1vbeln = v2vbeln
    INNER JOIN vbfa AS v3
       ON v1vbeln = v3vbeln
        WHERE v1~vbeln eq p_vbeln .
   loop at it_data1 into wa_data where erdat ne p_erdat.
   delete it_data1 from wa_data.
endloop.
end-of-selection.
thanks in advance.....

How have you defined your itab ?
You query looks perfectly ok , even if you use vbeln or vbelv it wont matter , it depends on the requirement.
So have you defined your itab correctly ?
for example :
data : begin of itab occurs 0,
         vbeln like vbrk-vbeln,
         kunag like vbrk-kunag,
         netwr like vbrk-netwr,
         ntgew like vbrp-ntgew,
         matnr like vbrp-matnr,
         erdat like vbfa-erdat,
         end of itab.
regards,
Advait

Select Query problem....too urgent

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for