Select query with secondary index

hi,
i have a report which is giving performance issues on a perticular select query on KONH table.
the select query doesnt use the primary key fields and table already has around 19 million entries.So there was a secondary index created for the fields in the table.
now, KONH is a client specific table, and hence has MANDT as the first field. when the table is not indexed it is sorted according to the order of fields, like first MANDT, then primary key fields and then remaining fields.. (correct me if i am wrong)
but the secondary index created doesnt has MANDT in it..(yea, a mistake! )...
but instead of correccting the secondary index, i am told to change the select query..
so, i used a "client specific" syntax to sort the issue.. but i dont understand whre i should put the "where mandt eq sy-mandt" clause..
should i put it right after all my secondary index fields are over? or what happens to the order of fields which are not present in the list of secondary index?
kindaly help.
thanx.

Hi chinmay kulkarni,
its better if you can ask concerned person to add MANDT field in your  index as well....
Indexes and MANDT
If a table begins with the mandt field, so should its indexes. If a table begins with mandt and an index doesn't, the optimizer might not use the index.
Remember, if you will, Open SQL's automatic client handling feature. When select * from ztxlfa1 where land1 = 'US' is executed, the actual SQL sent to the database is select * from ztxlfa1 where mandt = sy-mandt and land1 = 'US'. Sy-mandt contains the current logon client. When you select rows from a table using Open SQL, the system automatically adds sy-mandt to the where clause, which causes only those rows pertaining to the current logon client to be found.
When you create an index on a table containing mandt, therefore, you should also include mandt in the index. It should come first in the index, because it will always appear first in the generated SQL.
Index: Technical key of a database table.
Primary index: The primary index contains the key fields of the table and a pointer to the non-key fields of the table. The primary index is created automatically when the table is created in the database.
Secondary index: Additional indexes could be created considering the most frequently accessed dimensions of the table.
Structure of an Index
An index can be used to speed up the selection of data records from a table.
An index can be considered to be a copy of a database table reduced to certain fields. The data is stored in sorted form in this copy. This sorting permits fast access to the records of the table (for example using a binary search). Not all of the fields of the table are contained in the index. The index also contains a pointer from the index entry to the corresponding table entry to permit all the field contents to be read.
When creating indexes, please note that:
An index can only be used up to the last specified field in the selection! The fields which are specified in the WHERE clause for a large number of selections should be in the first position.
Only those fields whose values significantly restrict the amount of data are meaningful in an index.
When you change a data record of a table, you must adjust the index sorting. Tables whose contents are frequently changed therefore should not have too many indexes.
Make sure that the indexes on a table are as disjunctive as possible.
(That is they should contain as few fields in common as possible. If two indexes on a table have a large number of common fields, this could make it more difficult for the optimizer to choose the most selective index.)
For Example...
SELECT KUNNR KUNN2 INTO TABLE T_CUST_TERR
FROM KNVP CLIENT SPECIFIED
WHERE MANDT = SY-MANDT " here MANDT shd be first
AND KUNN2 IN S_TERR
AND PARVW LIKE 'Z%'.
Accessing tables using Indexes
The database optimizer decides which index on the table should be used by the database to access data records.
You must distinguish between the primary index and secondary indexes of a table. The primary index contains the key fields of the table. The primary index is automatically created in the database when the table is activated. If a large table is frequently accessed such that it is not possible to apply primary index sorting, you should create secondary indexes for the table.
The indexes on a table have a three-character index ID. '0' is reserved for the primary index. Customers can create their own indexes on SAP tables; their IDs must begin with Y or Z.
If the index fields have key function, i.e. they already uniquely identify each record of the table, an index can be called a unique index. This ensures that there are no duplicate index fields in the database.
When you define a secondary index in the ABAP Dictionary, you can specify whether it should be created on the database when it is activated. Some indexes only result in a gain in performance for certain database systems. You can therefore specify a list of database systems when you define an index. The index is then only created on the specified database systems when activated
Also pls have a look on below link
http://www.sapfans.com/sapfans/forum/devel/messages/30240.html
Hope it will solve your problem..
Reward points if useful...
Thanks & Regards
ilesh 24x7

Similar Messages

  • Issue with select query for secondary index

    Hi all,
    I have created a secondary index A on mara table with fields Mandt and Packaging Material Type VHART.
    Now i am trying to write a report
    Tables : mara.
    data : begin of itab occurs 0.
    include structure mara.
    data  : end of itab.
    *select * from mara into table itab*
    CLIENT SPECIFIED where
      MANDT = SY-MANDT and
      VHART = 'WER'.
    I'm getting an error
    Unable to interpret "CLIENT". Possible causes of error: Incorrect spelling or comma error.          
    if i change to my select query     to
    *select * from mara into table itab*
      where
      MANDT = SY-MANDT and
      VHART = 'WER'.
    I'm getting an error
    Without the addition "CLIENT SPECIFIED", you cannot specify the client     field "MANDT" in the WHERE condition.
    Let me know if iam wrong and we are at 4.6c
    Thanks

    Like I already said, even if you have added the mandt field in the secondary index, there is no need the use it in the select statement.
    Let me elaborate on my reply before. If you have created a UNIQUE index, which I don't think you have, then you should include CLIENT in the index. A unique index for a client-dependent table must contain the client field.
    Additional info:
    The accessing speed does not depend on whether or not an index is defined as a unique index. A unique index is simply a means of defining that certain field combinations of data records in a table are unique.
    Even if you have defined a secondary index, this does not automatically mean, that this index is used. This also depends on the database optimizer. The optimizer will determine which index is best and use it. So before transporting this index, you should make sure that the index is used. How to check this, have a look at the link:
    [check if index is used|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/cf/21eb3a446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm]
    Edited by: Micky Oestreich on May 13, 2008 10:09 PM

  • What is syntax for inner join of Select statement with  Secondary Index

    Hi Genies,
                    Here i have created the Secondary index for table COEP and also used for select query but there is no improvement in runtime . taking same time for select query without index as well as with index. my code is
    SELECT *  INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB_COEP FROM COEP AS A
                 INNER JOIN COBK  AS B ON ( A~BELNR = B~BELNR AND A~KOKRS = B~KOKRS AND A~GJAHR = B~GJAHR )
                 WHERE A~OBJNR = OBJNR
                 AND A~GJAHR = CURRY
                 AND B~GJAHR = CURRY
                 AND A~RBEST = ''
                 AND A~BEKNZ = 'S'
                 AND B~BELNR NE WA_COBK-BELNR
                 AND B~AWREF_REV = ''
                 AND B~AWORG_REV = ''
                 AND B~KOKRS = WA_COIOB-KOKRS
                 AND B~BLDAT BETWEEN START_DATE AND END_DATE
                 AND B~BLART IN ('SA','KA','KR','AB')  %_HINTS ORACLE 'INDEX("COEP" "COEP~ZBU")'.
    index name is ZBU.
    please any one let me know is there any syntax mistakes? but while checking and during the runtime it does'nt shows any error.
    Regards,
            Thangam.P

    Hi Genies,
                    Here i have created the Secondary index for table COEP and also used for select query but there is no improvement in runtime . taking same time for select query without index as well as with index. my code is
    SELECT *  INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE ITAB_COEP FROM COEP AS A
                 INNER JOIN COBK  AS B ON ( A~BELNR = B~BELNR AND A~KOKRS = B~KOKRS AND A~GJAHR = B~GJAHR )
                 WHERE A~OBJNR = OBJNR
                 AND A~GJAHR = CURRY
                 AND B~GJAHR = CURRY
                 AND A~RBEST = ''
                 AND A~BEKNZ = 'S'
                 AND B~BELNR NE WA_COBK-BELNR
                 AND B~AWREF_REV = ''
                 AND B~AWORG_REV = ''
                 AND B~KOKRS = WA_COIOB-KOKRS
                 AND B~BLDAT BETWEEN START_DATE AND END_DATE
                 AND B~BLART IN ('SA','KA','KR','AB')  %_HINTS ORACLE 'INDEX("COEP" "COEP~ZBU")'.
    index name is ZBU.
    please any one let me know is there any syntax mistakes? but while checking and during the runtime it does'nt shows any error.
    Regards,
            Thangam.P

  • BDC select query with addition based on all If conditions

    Hi can any one send me the select query with conditions like
    If Itab is not initial.
    Endif. and if possible with valiadations messages also.
    IF CHECK_NUMBER of CHECK_ADVICE of the flat file = PAYR-CHECT. Then update SAP field BSEG-XREF2 .
    9.     When Flat file check Number = PAYR-CHECT then Insert or Update Flat file RECEIPT_DATE into SAP field BSEG-XREF1.
    Please send me immediately.

    >     SELECT rsnum
    >            rspos
    >            matnr
    >            werks
    >         lgort
    >            shkzg
    >            aufnr
    >            bdmng
    >            enmng                      
    >            FROM  resb INTO  TABLE it_rsnum FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_aufnr
    >            WHERE rsnum EQ it_aufnr-rsnum
    >            AND   xloek NE 'X'
    >            AND   postp NE 'X'
    >            AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
    >   ENDIF.
    >
    > Database Table RESB: 40,000,000 Records (40 Million)
    > Internal Table   it_aufnr:  20,000 Entries
    > Entries selected from RESB: 150,000.
    >
    Hi,
    the problem is the big for all entries table.
    Your 20.000 records FAE will be split into SEVERAL sql statements depending on the size of the table.
    Where do you get the it_auftrn from?
    If it's another transparent table try to JOIN this table to your big table.
    SELECT rsnum
                rspos
                matnr
                werks
            lgort
                shkzg
                aufnr
                bdmng
                enmng                      
                FROM  resb JOIN tab_auftrn  on  resbrsnum = tab_auftrnauftrn
                AND   xloek NE 'X'
                AND   postp NE 'X'
                AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
    Make sure that your WHERE filter and the JOIN keys on both tables are supported by indexes.
    150.000 records about of 40 Mio. can definitly be serviced by an appropriate index:
    i.e. Index fields (check your PK or secondary indexes):
    rsnum
    enmng                      
    aufnr
    bye
    yk

  • Select query performance improvement - Index on EDIDC table

    Hi Experts,
    I have a scenario where in I have to select data from the table EDIDC. The select query being used is given below.
      SELECT  docnum
              direct
              mestyp
              mescod
              rcvprn
              sndprn
              upddat
              updtim
      INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE t_edidc
      FROM edidc
      FOR ALL ENTRIES IN t_error_idoc
      WHERE
      upddat GE gv_date1 AND
      upddat LE gv_date2 AND
      updtim GE p_time AND
      status EQ t_error_idoc-status.
    As the volume of the data is very high, our client requested to put up some index or use an existing one to improve the performance of the data selection query.
    Question:
    4.    How do we identify the index to be used.
    5.    On which fields should the indexing be done to improve the performance (if available indexes donu2019t cater to our case).
    6.    What will be the impact on the table performance if we create a new index.
    Regards ,
    Raghav

    Question:
    1.    How do we identify the index to be used.
    Generally the index is automatically selected by SAP (DB Optimizer )  ( You can still mention the index name in your select query by changing the syntax)
      For your select Query the second Index will be called automatically by the Optimizer, ( Because  the select query has u2018Updatu2019 , u2018uptimu2019 in the sequence before the u2018statusu2019 ) .
    2.    On which fields should the indexing be done to improve the performance (if available indexes donu2019t cater to our case).
    (Create a new Index with MANDT and the 4 fields which are in the where clause in sequence  )
    3.    What will be the impact on the table performance if we create a new index.
    ( Since the index which will be newly created is only the 4th index for the table, there shouldnu2019t be any side affects)
    After creation of index , Check the change in performance of the current program and also some other programs which are having the select queries on EDIDC ( Various types of where clauses preferably ) to verify that the newly created index is not having the negative impact on the performance. Additionally, if possible , check if you can avoid  into corresponding fields .
    Regards ,
    Seth

  • Issue in select query with where clause

    Hi guys,
    I'm facing an issue while using select query with the where clause. When I'm selecting all the data from the table it returns the correct result. But when I'm using the where clause to get the specific rows from the table it returns no rows. But the data I'm trying to fetch using the where condition exists in the table.
    Here is my query which causing the issue,
    select * from mytable where myfield = 'myvalue'
    But if I use the following query it returns the result correctly.
    select * from mytable
    Also the myfield value 'myvalue' exists in the table.
    I have tried by running this query in both SQL Developer and SQL Plus. I have tried this query in mssql as well. It works perfectly and returns correct result sets for both the queries I have mentioned above. I'm unable to predict the issue as I'm new to ORACLE. Please help.
    Thanks,
    Ram.

    Hi Ram,
    I experienced an issue similar to this with a varchar2 field. Some of our records had a hidden newline character at the end of them, which was making queries like the one below fail:
    select * from employees
    where email = '[email protected]'The best way I found to detect this was to use
    select 'XX'||email||'XX' from employeesTo make sure that there were no newlines. But that is just a guess. If you could provide some example table data and the outputs of your selects, it would be helpful.
    Jeff

  • How to write XSJS Select Query with input parameters

    Hello Experts,
    I am creating a xsjs file and in that file I am trying to write a Select Query based on a Calculation View
    I have tried it the following way:
    var query = 'SELECT TOP 100 \"Name\", \"Address\", \"City\", \"Country\" FROM \"_SYS_BIC\".\"Test.HL/AddressView\"'
        + 'WITH PARAMETERS(\'PLACEHOLDER\' = (\'$$P_Name$$\', \' Akhil \'),'
      + '\'PLACEHOLDER\' = (\'$$P_City$$\', \' Lucknow \'))';
    But it gives me the "Mixed spaces and tabs error".
    How should I write XSJS Select Query with input parameters?
    Regards,
    Rohit

    >But it gives me the "Mixed spaces and tabs error".
    Mixed spaces and tabs has nothing to do with the syntax of the statement. You used both spaces and the tab in the content - which JSLint doesn't like.  Remove the beginning spaces of each line and use only one or the other.
    The actual syntax of your statement doesn't look right.  The problem is that you are escaping the \ when you don't need to if you are using ' instead of " for your string.  You escape with \" in the first line but then escape with \' in the 2nd and 3rd line.  That is going to cause serious parsing problems with the command.

  • Absolute dynamic select query with dynamic join and where

    Has anyone ever tried creating an absolutely dynamic SELECT query with dynamic Join and Where conditions.
    I have a requirement of creating such a query in an Utility Class, and i have written the code. But its throwing my sysntax errors.
    Please let me know where am I going wrong OR is it really possible to create such a dynamic Query??
        SELECT (FIELDS) INTO TABLE IT_TABLES
          FROM ( (ME->TABLE1)  inner join ( me->table2 )
          on ( on_condition ) )
          WHERE (me->where_fields).
    Ags.

    It worked for me in a following way:
    select * into corresponding fields of table <result_table>
            from (join_string)
            where (l_where).
    Where the contents of join_string were dynamically build using concatenation. So it will be something like
    concatenate ME->TABLE1 'as a INNER JOIN' me->table2 'as b ON (' into join_string separated by space.
    <...>
    add here matching/reference colums, something like
    concatenate 'a~' me->TABLE1_JOIN_COL into temp1.
    concatenate 'b~' me->TABLE2_JOIN_COL into temp2.
    concatenate join_string temp1 '=' temp2 into join_string separated by space.
    <...>
    concatenate join_string ')' into join_string separated by space.
    And then use similar approach for l_where variable.

  • Dynamic select query with dynamic where condition

    Hi all,
    I want to use the dynamic select query with dynamic where condition. For that I used the below code but I am getting dump when using this code.
    Please advice, if there is any other way to achieve this requirement.
    Thanks,
    Sanket Sethi
    Code***************
    PARAMETERS: p_tabnam      TYPE tabname,
                p_selfl1      TYPE edpline,
                p_value       TYPE edpline,
                p_where1      TYPE edpline .
    DATA: lt_where    TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
          lt_sel_list TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
          l_wa_name   TYPE string,
          ls_where    TYPE edpline,
          l_having    TYPE string,
          dref        TYPE REF TO data,
          itab_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_tabledescr,
          struct_type TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr,
          elem_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_elemdescr,
          comp_tab    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component_table,
          comp_fld    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component.
    TYPES: f_count TYPE i.
    FIELD-SYMBOLS : <lt_outtab> TYPE ANY TABLE,
    *                <ls_outtab> TYPE ANY,
                    <l_fld> TYPE ANY.
    struct_type ?= cl_abap_typedescr=>describe_by_name( p_tabnam ).
    elem_type   ?= cl_abap_elemdescr=>describe_by_name( 'F_COUNT' ).
    comp_tab = struct_type->get_components( ).
    comp_fld-name = 'F_COUNT'.
    comp_fld-type = elem_type.
    APPEND comp_fld TO comp_tab.
    struct_type = cl_abap_structdescr=>create( comp_tab ).
    itab_type   = cl_abap_tabledescr=>create( struct_type ).
    l_wa_name = 'l_WA'.
    CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE itab_type.
    ASSIGN dref->* TO <lt_outtab>.
    *CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE struct_type.
    *ASSIGN dref->* TO <ls_outtab>.
    * Creation of the selection fields
    APPEND p_selfl1 TO lt_sel_list.
    APPEND 'COUNT(*) AS F_COUNT' TO lt_sel_list.
    ** Creation of the "where" clause
    *CONCATENATE p_selfl1 '= '' p_value ''.'
    *            INTO ls_where
    *            SEPARATED BY space.
    *APPEND ls_where TO lt_where.
    * Creation of the "where" clause
    APPEND p_where1 TO lt_where.
    * Creation of the "having" clause
    l_having = 'count(*) >= 1'.
    * THE dynamic select
    SELECT          (lt_sel_list)
           FROM     (p_tabnam)
           INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>.
    *       WHERE    (lt_where).

    Hi Sanket,
    The above given logic of mine works for you, put the code in the If condition and try-
    just like below:
    IF NOT P_EBELN IS INITIAL.
    lt_where = '& = ''&'' '.
    REPLACE '&' WITH p_ebeln INTO lt_where.
    REPLACE '&' WITH field_value INTO lt_where.
    SELECT (lt_sel_list) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>
    FROM (p_tabnam)
    WHERE (lt_where).
    ENDIF.
    thanks\
    Mahesh

  • Partial insert with secondary index

    I'd like to use partial inserts (DB_DBT_PARTIAL).
    However, I also need secondary indexes. Now when I insert partial data, the secondary index function is immediately called, but still I do not have enough data to calculate the secondary key. I tried to supply some app_data do the DBT, but it does not reach the secondary index function.
    Is there any way I can use partial inserts together with secondary indexes?

    When writing a partial record to the primary database, here's what we do:
    1. Look up the existing record via get()
    2. Using the existing record and the partial DBT, construct the new record
    3. Pass that newly constructed record to the secondary key generation function
    You don't need to do anything special, your callback will receive the full record, even though you passed us a partial DBT. If that's not the case, there's a bug in BDB and we'd need to see your code.
    app_data is a private field, you should not try to use it or expect it to work predictably. In this situation, we're passing a brand new DBT to the callback function, not the DBT you gave us. That's why app_data is empty.
    Thanks,
    Bogdan Coman

  • I need to add a single field from with_item table . need to write select query with reference to company code , account doc no , fiscal year

    I need to add a single field from with_item table . need to write select query with reference to company code , account doc no , fiscal year

    Hi Arun ,
    Can you explain little bit more ??
    what is account doc no? 
    what are the transactions should be displayed in your output??
    -Rajesh N

  • How to rename database with secondary indexes.

    Hi,
    could somebody advise how to run correct next operation:
    I have database with secondary indexes in a single file and I need to rename that db file.
    As I understand I have to
    1) close and delete all database handles
    2) remove from db file all secondary indexes with DbEnv::dbremove
    3) rename db file with DbEnv::dbrename
    4) create primary db
    5) create once again all secondary indexes and associate them with primary db
    Appreciate in advance.

    Hi,
    Your question has two possible cases:
    1. A single file contains main DB and its secondary indexes.
    2. A file contains several secondary indexes of main DB, another file contains the main DB.
    For the first case, the main database could be renamed directly, but all of the secondary databases do not continue to work. That means no new index items will be added automatically into exist secondary databases. So these secondary databases should be removed and created, you could also just run a DB->associate to re-associate it again. But in the later way, the re-associated secondary DB won't automatic index these records that are added before associating.
    That means, if main db is renamed and then inserted a record 'A'. Then secondary DB is re-associated to main db. The secondary DB still does not index record 'A'. And currently there is not method to let secondary DB manually index 'A' again. So it is better to remove and create a new secondary DB with DB_CREATE flag. That will make the new secondary DB scan current items and index them.
    For the second case, the result is the same, main database could be remained directly. Then all of the secondary databases should be re-created or re-associated. Still for the described reason, we prefer the first way.
    And, removing old secondary databases before renaming main database is also work in above cases.
    Thanks,
    Victor Yang

  • How to re-write this big SELECT Query with INNER JOINs?

    Hi Experts
    I have a performance killer SELECT query with an inner join of 3 tables u2013 VBAP, VBAK and VBEP together, which populates records to an internal table INT_COLL_ORD. Based on these records selected, in another SELECT query, records are fetched from VBUK table to the internal table INT_VBUK.
    SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV D~AUART E~ETTYP E~EDATU
    INTO TABLE INT_TAB_RES
    FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBAK AS D
    ON D~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND D~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
    INNER JOIN VBEP AS E
    ON E~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND E~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND E~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
    WHERE  A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
           D~auart in s_auart AND
           D~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
           D~vbtyp eq 'C'     AND
           ( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
           OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
           A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
           A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
           A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
           E~ETENR EQ '1'.
    SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
    DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_TAB_RES COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
    CHECK NOT INT_TAB_RES [] IS INITIAL.
    SELECT VBELN UVALL CMGST INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
    FROM VBUK FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_TAB_RES
    WHERE VBELN = INT_TAB_RES-VBELN AND UVALL NE 'A'.
    Now, the requirement is:
    I want to split this query. Like, first join VBAK and VBUK first. With this selection, go to the inner join of VBAP and VBEP (on key VBELN) to get the results. How can I re-write this Query?
    Please help.
    Thx n Rgds

    Hi Nagraj
    As of your suggestion, I have re-written the query as below:
    * Declarations
    TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_COLL_ORD,
            VBELN  LIKE VBAK-VBELN,
            POSNR  LIKE VBUP-POSNR,
            MATNR  LIKE VBAP-MATNR,
            KWMENG LIKE VBAP-KWMENG,
            KBMENG LIKE VBAP-KBMENG,
            ERDAT  LIKE VBAK-ERDAT,
            ERZET  LIKE VBAK-ERZET,
            PSTYV  LIKE VBAP-PSTYV,
            AUART  LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Calready exists in type
            ETTYP  LIKE VBEP-ETTYP,
            EDATU  LIKE VBEP-EDATU.
    TYPES: END OF TYP_COLL_ORD.
    DATA: INT_COLL_ORD TYPE TABLE OF TYP_COLL_ORD WITH HEADER LINE.
    TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_VBUK,
            AUART  LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Chave added this field
            VBELN  LIKE VBUK-VBELN,
            UVALL  LIKE VBUK-UVALL,
            CMGST  LIKE VBUK-CMGST.
    TYPES: END OF TYP_VBUK.
    DATA: INT_VBUK TYPE TABLE OF TYP_VBUK WITH HEADER LINE.
    *QUERY#1 u2013 for VBAK & VBUK Join
    SELECT A~AUART B~VBELN B~UVALL B~CMGST
    INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
    FROM VBAK AS A INNER JOIN VBUK AS B
    ON A~VBELN EQ B~VBELN
    WHERE A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
    A~auart in s_auart AND
    A~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
    A~vbtyp eq 'C' AND
    B~UVALL NE 'A'.
    IF NOT INT_VBUK[] IS INITIAL.
    SORT INT_VBUK BY VBELN.
    DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_VBUK COMPARING VBELN.
    *QUERY#2 u2013 for VBAP & VBEP Join
    SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV B~ETTYP B~EDATU
    INTO TABLE INT_COLL_ORD
    FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBEP AS B
    ON B~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND B~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND B~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_VBUK
    WHERE A~VBELN = INT_VBUK-VBELN AND
    ( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
    OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
    A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
    A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
    A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
    B~ETENR EQ '1'.
    ENDIF.
      SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY  VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
      DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_COLL_ORD
        COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
      CHECK NOT INT_COLL_ORD[] IS INITIAL.
      LOOP AT INT_COLL_ORD.
        CLEAR: L_MTART,L_ATPPR,L_ETTYP.
        IF L_PREVIOUS_ETTYP NE INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP OR
          L_PREVIOUS_AUART NE INT_COLL_ORD-AUART.
          READ TABLE INT_OVRCTL WITH KEY AUART = INT_COLL_ORD-AUART ETTYP = INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP.
          CHECK SY-SUBRC NE 0.
    Now, the issue is:
    Please note that declaration for INT_COLL_ORD has a field AUART, which is used in further parts of program (see the statement just above)
    But, since neither VBAP nor VBEP contains AUART field, it cannot be fetched through the QUERY#2. So this value is not populated into INT_COLL_ORD through SELECT Query.
    Since this field is used in later part of program & that the internal table has no value for this field, it dumps!!
    How to include this value into the INT_COLL_ORD?
    Plz suggest....

  • Select query with index acess

    Hello,
    Please give me some code with using index acess ( please high light the index)

    SELECT carrid connid cityfrom
    FROM spfli INTO (xcarrid, xconnid, xcityfrom)
    WHERE carrid = 'LH ' AND cityfrom = 'FRANKFURT'
    <b>%_HINTS ORACLE 'INDEX("SPFLI" "SPFLI~001")'.</b>
    WRITE: / xcarrid, xconnid, xcityfrom.
    ENDSELECT.
    chk this
    Select using Secondary Index
    Message was edited by:
            Chandrasekhar Jagarlamudi

  • Drilling down slow - Something wrong with Secondary Indexes

    Hi,
    I have a cube that on the whole works very well, but periodically when I drill down to some characteristics it runs extremely slowly.
    The cube is in a our Test environment and is not being updated with data.
    When I go to RSA1[Select Cube] Manage>Performance, the DB indexes are now green after reactivating the cube and recreating the indexes.
    Yet, when I drill down to certain characteristics, I can see in SM50 the query is doing a sequential read. It looks as if the secondary index on this dimension is not doing its job or being ignored.
    I have tried Checking the Cube Database Indexes in RSRV and all is okay. The Master Data in the relevant dimension all seems to be active.
    Any suggestions on how to get to the bottom of this would be much appreciated.
    A trace on the SQL is showing the following statement taking excessive time:
    Select * from RSDCHABAS where CHABASNM = ? and OBJVERS = ?.
    I'm not sure why it's getting stuck on this table and it just list of InfoObjects. It is not reading from the actual cube in this statement.
    Regards
    Adrian

    Hi Adrian,
    In BW we are while tranforming data from source system we are using this table to dump the data in table RSDCHABAS. Which is nothing but use as buffer.
    Basically this issue is due to low Temporary memory available on the system. Please check Temp memory available in DB02 and send this to your basis team to clear / entend this temp memory.
    This will deffinately resolve this error.
    Regards,
    Mahesh

Maybe you are looking for

  • 13.3 Macbook Pro Retina Keeps rebooting after recent iTune updates

    This morning after I installed the new iTune updates (11.2.?), the macbook pro just flashed with some color stripes and then screen went black. I need to long hold reboot key to turn it off and turn it back on. My iPhone was connecting with the Macbo

  • Video not in sync on external monitor

    Hi- I have Final Cut Pro 4, with the computer hooked to a DVCAM deck via firewire. The deck is hooked up to an external Sony NTSC monitor via BNC cables. When logging and capturing, I can see the video on the external monitor and it looks fine. Howev

  • How do I get automator scripts into iTunes? Very frustrated.

    This is one of those questions that probably has a very simple answer unless you haven't worked with Automator or applescripts. I found Automator, created a script for iTunes to change settings for audiobooks that I import from CD so that it remember

  • Why are Financial Reporting Reports not showing in FR studio?

    Hi, We had to change the BI server's DNS name. We have Workspace, FR, WA, IR installed all on this BI server. After changing the DNS name, and reconfiguring using ConfigTool, we were not able to find our old FR reports. 1) Can anyone tell me in which

  • Why authorization object M_MSEG_LGO for MB1B (MTy 301) is not symmetrical?

    When transfer posting (MB1B, MTy 301) from storage location 3030 in plant 1000 to storage location 8000 in plant 1910, authorization object M_MSEG_LGO is checked. The activity is 01, movement type is 301, storage location is 3030, and plant is 1000.