Select query with UNION clause in database adapter

Friends,
I have got a SQL query with two UNION clause withing it. like
select a,b,c
from a
union
select a,b,c
from b
The schema generated is like below in sequence
<element>a</element>
<element>b</element>
<element>c</element>
<element>a</element>
<element>b</element>
<element>c</element>
So, the columns from different select queries joined with UNION clause are all appeared in schema instead of the distinct columns.
Is there any way around to solve this issue ? or will need to with DB function/procedure.

I think I know what you are saying but your example doesn't make sense, your SQL should produce something like
I had to change a, b, c with elementA, elementB, elementC as a and b are reserved html tags.
<elementA>DateA</elementA>
<elementB>DataB</elementB>
<elementC>DataC</elementC>
...What is the result of the query when you run it in SQLPlus? Is it what you expect?
cheers
James

Similar Messages

Issue in select query with where clause

Hi guys,
I'm facing an issue while using select query with the where clause. When I'm selecting all the data from the table it returns the correct result. But when I'm using the where clause to get the specific rows from the table it returns no rows. But the data I'm trying to fetch using the where condition exists in the table.
Here is my query which causing the issue,
select * from mytable where myfield = 'myvalue'
But if I use the following query it returns the result correctly.
select * from mytable
Also the myfield value 'myvalue' exists in the table.
I have tried by running this query in both SQL Developer and SQL Plus. I have tried this query in mssql as well. It works perfectly and returns correct result sets for both the queries I have mentioned above. I'm unable to predict the issue as I'm new to ORACLE. Please help.
Thanks,
Ram.

Hi Ram,
I experienced an issue similar to this with a varchar2 field. Some of our records had a hidden newline character at the end of them, which was making queries like the one below fail:
select * from employees
where email = '[email protected]'The best way I found to detect this was to use
select 'XX'||email||'XX' from employeesTo make sure that there were no newlines. But that is just a guess. If you could provide some example table data and the outputs of your selects, it would be helpful.
Jeff

Dynamic where clause in database adapter

Hi
I have requirement to develop SOA service for search page! The back-end query for search is required to have where clauses to be appended to SELECT statement dynamically depending upon search criteria the user selects!
E.g. if user is searching employee from a portal! If employee selects mobile number of the employee, or joining date range or other criteria, then accordingly appropriate clauses are to be appended to SEARCH SELECT statement.
Can we achieve same while implementing executing database query through database adapter from BPEL service?
Thanks In Advance
Priyadarshi

It is difficult using the standard database adapter approach. You may have to use nested sql queries.Following is a good example of the same.
Neeraj Sehgal - Experimenting with SOA: Pass multiple parameters, dynamic query in Pure SQL in Database Adapter
If your only problem in using this that you are hard coding the connection details , you can use the datasource jndi name in the query. hence you will not be required to change your code when moving from one env to other env. You just have to take care of keeping the jndi name same in all the env.

Dynamic where clause in Database Adapter, or workaround?

Hello friends,
Is there any way to change where clause in Database Adapter (DA) dynamically.
For e.g. i do have Database Adapter with sql statement: select col1,col2 from my_table. Originally i have many parameters which are not mandatory so instead of creating where clause in DA like:
select col1, col2 from my_table where+
*((#p_col_1 is not null and #p_col_1=col1) or #p_col_1 is null)*
and ...
and ((#p_col_n is not null and #p_col_n=col_n) or #p_col_n is null)
i would like to create a where clause dynamically depend on what parameters are not empty or receive where clause as parameter. Is it possible? Are there any others workarounds you can suggest?
will appreciate any thoughts...

Thanks Deepa for the links, their where quite helpful. And i must admit this partially answers my question (at least example i provided).
However - how about if i'd like to use LIKE clauses instead of =, or IN or NOT IN? e.g:
select col1, col2 from my_table where+
((#p_col_1 is not null and #p_col_1 LIKE col1) or #p_col_1 is null)
and ...
and ((#p_col_n is not null and col_n IN #p_col_n) or #p_col_n is null)
Is it possible?
thanks in advance

Outer join on query with OR clause

hi all, i am having problem outerjoining a query with or clause
here is my data
WITH table1 AS
SELECT 'test' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT null txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT null txt1, NULL txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 'text5' txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, null txt4 FROM dual
,table2 AS
SELECT 111 pid, 'test' txt1, 'pak4' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 222 pid, 'test1' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 333 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su4' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT 444 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced4' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual
SELECT b.pid, a.*
from table1 a, table2 b
WHERE (a.txt1 = b.txt1 OR
       a.txt1 IS NULL AND a.txt2=b.txt2 OR
       Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL AND a.txt3 = b.txt3 OR
       Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL AND a.txt3 IS NULL AND a.txt4 = b.txt4
       ) as you can see i am joining table1 and table 2. i am joining with txt1, if txt1 is null then join by txt2, if null then join by txt3 and so on.
the code above product this output
PID     TXT1     TXT2     TXT3     TXT4
===     ====     ===   ==== ====
111     test     pak      ced     su
222             pak      ced2     su2
333                     ced3     su3
444                          su3this output is partially correct. only 4 rows were display and two was left out
SELECT 'text5' txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
SELECT null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, null txt4 FROM dual i tried using outer join but oracle complain that i cannot use outerjoin with OR clause.
can someone help modify my query to display the output below ?
PID     TXT1     TXT2     TXT3     TXT4
===    ====      ===   ==== ====
111     test     pak      ced     su
222             pak      ced2     su2
333                     ced3     su3
444                          su3
NULL NULL   NULL    NULL   NULL
     test5

Not sure you can do it with the Oracle style outer joins, but wioth ANSI style joins it is simple, actually exactly as you had it.
SQL> set null null;
SQL> WITH table1 AS (
2   SELECT 'test' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
3   SELECT null txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
4   SELECT null txt1, NULL txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
5   SELECT null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
6   SELECT 'text5' txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
7   SELECT null txt1, NULL txt2, null txt3, null txt4 FROM dual),
8 table2 AS (
9   SELECT 111 pid, 'test' txt1, 'pak4' txt2, 'ced' txt3, 'su' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
10   SELECT 222 pid, 'test1' txt1, 'pak' txt2, 'ced2' txt3, 'su2' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
11   SELECT 333 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced3' txt3, 'su4' txt4 FROM dual UNION ALL
12   SELECT 444 pid, 'test2' txt1, 'pak3' txt2, 'ced4' txt3, 'su3' txt4 FROM dual)
13 SELECT b.pid, a.*
14 from table1 a
15     LEFT JOIN table2 b
16        ON (a.txt1 = b.txt1 OR
17            a.txt1 IS NULL AND a.txt2=b.txt2 OR
18            Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL AND a.txt3 = b.txt3 OR
19            Nvl(a.txt2, a.txt1) IS NULL AND a.txt3 IS NULL AND a.txt4 = b.txt4);
       PID TXT1   TXT2   TXT3   TXT4
       111 test   pak    ced    su
       222 null   pak    ced2   su2
       333 null   null   ced3   su3
       444 null   null   null   su3
null       text5 null   null   su3
null       null   null   null   nullJohn

Query with union

Hi,
I have three table:
Candidates: (candidate_id primary key)
Purhcase_orders: (Po_number primary key)
Bids: (bid_number primary key)
Just wanted to retrieve candidate information like candidate_id, first_name etc, along with count of purchase orders issued against this candidate and count of bid_number.
For that I have written below query:
query - 1:
SELECT CANDIDATE_ID,
INITCAP (first_name) FIRST_NAME,
+(SELECT COUNT (DISTINCT bid_number)+
FROM bids
WHERE BIDS.CANDIDATE_ID = cand.candidate_id)
BID_COUNT,
+(SELECT COUNT (DISTINCT po_number)+
FROM purchase_orders po
WHERE PO.CONTRACTEE_ID = cand.candidate_id)
PO_COUNT,
+'Y' match_flag,+
DECODE ( (SELECT candidate_id
FROM v_ineligible_candidates vic
WHERE VIC.CANDIDATE_ID = cand.candidate_id),
NULL, 'N',
+'Y')+
INELIGIBLE_FLAG
FROM candidates cand
Based on business requirement, need to create another set of query (query -2) same like above. In that we have some decode statements to calculate match_flag, then need to perform UNION operation between query -1 and query -2.
have around 130563 number of rows in candidates table.
Individually both queries are taking 500 msec.
But when I have used union, it didnt give result for atleast 60 sec. Then I cancelled execution.
Execution plan for the final query with UNION: (final cost)
Cost: 2,873 Bytes: 9,130,170 Cardinality: 260,862
Please help me in this issue.
Why its taking that much time in union.
Please correct my mistake and suggest me in this query.
UNION ALL is running but not UNION.
Thanks in advance

Please post complete Explain Plans.
To get detailed information of Explain Plan use
explain plan for
your_query;
select *
from table(dbms_xplan.display(null, null, 'ALL'));Post it alongwith below details between {noformat}{noformat} (exactly as specified) tags to preserve formatting and ease of understanding.
On your requirement,
Using UNIONALL you will get two set of rows, with UNION you might get a single row if your MATCH_FLAG are same for both queries. Use of either, has to meet your requirements than to meet your performance. If it is Business Acceptable, then look for performance and tuning.
If you could do the folllowing, it might be helpful for you.
1. Post the Sample table structure (Table information of Candidates should suffice) in a Create Table/With Sub-Query clause.
2. Sample Data in Insert Into/With Sub-Query format.
3. Expected Outcome based on Sample data
4. The Explain Plan of your Queries as requested above.
Reason of asking these details are, there might be a way to avoid Hitting the table Twice and avoid use of UNION/UNIONALL clauses.

Dynamic select query with dynamic where condition

Hi all,
I want to use the dynamic select query with dynamic where condition. For that I used the below code but I am getting dump when using this code.
Please advice, if there is any other way to achieve this requirement.
Thanks,
Sanket Sethi
Code***************
PARAMETERS: p_tabnam      TYPE tabname,
            p_selfl1      TYPE edpline,
            p_value       TYPE edpline,
            p_where1      TYPE edpline .
DATA: lt_where    TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
      lt_sel_list TYPE TABLE OF edpline,
      l_wa_name   TYPE string,
      ls_where    TYPE edpline,
      l_having    TYPE string,
      dref        TYPE REF TO data,
      itab_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_tabledescr,
      struct_type TYPE REF TO cl_abap_structdescr,
      elem_type   TYPE REF TO cl_abap_elemdescr,
      comp_tab    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component_table,
      comp_fld    TYPE cl_abap_structdescr=>component.
TYPES: f_count TYPE i.
FIELD-SYMBOLS : <lt_outtab> TYPE ANY TABLE,
*                <ls_outtab> TYPE ANY,
                <l_fld> TYPE ANY.
struct_type ?= cl_abap_typedescr=>describe_by_name( p_tabnam ).
elem_type   ?= cl_abap_elemdescr=>describe_by_name( 'F_COUNT' ).
comp_tab = struct_type->get_components( ).
comp_fld-name = 'F_COUNT'.
comp_fld-type = elem_type.
APPEND comp_fld TO comp_tab.
struct_type = cl_abap_structdescr=>create( comp_tab ).
itab_type   = cl_abap_tabledescr=>create( struct_type ).
l_wa_name = 'l_WA'.
CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE itab_type.
ASSIGN dref->* TO <lt_outtab>.
*CREATE DATA dref TYPE HANDLE struct_type.
*ASSIGN dref->* TO <ls_outtab>.
* Creation of the selection fields
APPEND p_selfl1 TO lt_sel_list.
APPEND 'COUNT(*) AS F_COUNT' TO lt_sel_list.
** Creation of the "where" clause
*CONCATENATE p_selfl1 '= '' p_value ''.'
*            INTO ls_where
*            SEPARATED BY space.
*APPEND ls_where TO lt_where.
* Creation of the "where" clause
APPEND p_where1 TO lt_where.
* Creation of the "having" clause
l_having = 'count(*) >= 1'.
* THE dynamic select
SELECT          (lt_sel_list)
       FROM     (p_tabnam)
       INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>.
*       WHERE    (lt_where).

Hi Sanket,
The above given logic of mine works for you, put the code in the If condition and try-
just like below:
IF NOT P_EBELN IS INITIAL.
lt_where = '& = ''&'' '.
REPLACE '&' WITH p_ebeln INTO lt_where.
REPLACE '&' WITH field_value INTO lt_where.
SELECT (lt_sel_list) INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE <lt_outtab>
FROM (p_tabnam)
WHERE (lt_where).
ENDIF.
thanks\
Mahesh

BDC select query with addition based on all If conditions

Hi can any one send me the select query with conditions like
If Itab is not initial.
Endif. and if possible with valiadations messages also.
IF CHECK_NUMBER of CHECK_ADVICE of the flat file = PAYR-CHECT. Then update SAP field BSEG-XREF2 .
9.     When Flat file check Number = PAYR-CHECT then Insert or Update Flat file RECEIPT_DATE into SAP field BSEG-XREF1.
Please send me immediately.

>     SELECT rsnum
>            rspos
>            matnr
>            werks
>         lgort
>            shkzg
>            aufnr
>            bdmng
>            enmng
>            FROM resb INTO TABLE it_rsnum FOR ALL ENTRIES IN it_aufnr
>            WHERE rsnum EQ it_aufnr-rsnum
>            AND   xloek NE 'X'
>            AND   postp NE 'X'
>            AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
>   ENDIF.
>
> Database Table RESB: 40,000,000 Records (40 Million)
> Internal Table   it_aufnr: 20,000 Entries
> Entries selected from RESB: 150,000.
>
Hi,
the problem is the big for all entries table.
Your 20.000 records FAE will be split into SEVERAL sql statements depending on the size of the table.
Where do you get the it_auftrn from?
If it's another transparent table try to JOIN this table to your big table.
SELECT rsnum
            rspos
            matnr
            werks
        lgort
            shkzg
            aufnr
            bdmng
            enmng
            FROM resb JOIN tab_auftrn on resbrsnum = tab_auftrnauftrn
            AND   xloek NE 'X'
            AND   postp NE 'X'
            AND   resbbdmng GE resbenmng.
Make sure that your WHERE filter and the JOIN keys on both tables are supported by indexes.
150.000 records about of 40 Mio. can definitly be serviced by an appropriate index:
i.e. Index fields (check your PK or secondary indexes):
rsnum
enmng
aufnr
bye
yk

Hierarchical query with where clause

Hi,
How can I query hierarchically a query with WHERE clause? I have a table with three fields session_id,id and root_id.
When I try with the following query,
select id, level from relation
where session_id = 79977
connect by prior id = root_id start with id = 5042;
It gets duplicate values.
I want the query to show in the hierarchical manner with a filter condition using WHERE clause. Please help me how can I achieve this. If you know any link that describes more about this, please send it.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
-Parmy

Hi Sridhar Murthy an others,
Thanks a lot for your/the answer. It's working for me. It saved a lot of other work around without the proper knowledge of hierarchical query. Please send me any link that describes these issues in detail and also I hope as I have mentioned in the other message, same cannot be achieved on views or ( on two different tables ???)
Any way thanks for your reply,
It's working for me.
With happiness,
-Parmy

SQL statement with union clause

Hi,
I have a scenario where i need to generate a sql statement with UNION .
Eg:
SELECT B.YY_ID,
FROM XXXX.YY B
WHERE (B.YY_TY= 'as')
UNION
SELECT B.YY_ID
FROM XXXX.YY_ALT_NAME A, XXXX.YY B
WHERE (A.YY_TY= 'zx'
AND (B.YY_ID=A.YY_ID)"
I tried ns1:table1() union ns3:table2() in XQuery.
But it is pushdown as 2 seperate sqls.
Is it possible to create XQuery that pushdown as SINGLE SQL statement with union clause ?
Thanks

No. See 3.1.1.5 in the document I referenced in your previous post.

Hosting company does not support SQL query with OUTFILE clause

From my mysql database, I want to allow the user to run a query and produce a csv / text file of our membership database. Unfortunately, I just found out my hosting company does not support the SQL query with OUTFILE clause for MySQL database.
Are there any other options available to produce a file besides me running the query in phpadmin and making the file available to users.
Thanks. George

Maybe this external Export Mysql data to CSV - PHP tutorial will be of help
Cheers,
Günter

How to write XSJS Select Query with input parameters

Hello Experts,
I am creating a xsjs file and in that file I am trying to write a Select Query based on a Calculation View
I have tried it the following way:
var query = 'SELECT TOP 100 \"Name\", \"Address\", \"City\", \"Country\" FROM \"_SYS_BIC\".\"Test.HL/AddressView\"'
+ 'WITH PARAMETERS(\'PLACEHOLDER\' = (\'$$P_Name$$\', \' Akhil \'),'
+ '\'PLACEHOLDER\' = (\'$$P_City$$\', \' Lucknow \'))';
But it gives me the "Mixed spaces and tabs error".
How should I write XSJS Select Query with input parameters?
Regards,
Rohit

>But it gives me the "Mixed spaces and tabs error".
Mixed spaces and tabs has nothing to do with the syntax of the statement. You used both spaces and the tab in the content - which JSLint doesn't like. Remove the beginning spaces of each line and use only one or the other.
The actual syntax of your statement doesn't look right. The problem is that you are escaping the \ when you don't need to if you are using ' instead of " for your string. You escape with \" in the first line but then escape with \' in the 2nd and 3rd line. That is going to cause serious parsing problems with the command.

Absolute dynamic select query with dynamic join and where

Has anyone ever tried creating an absolutely dynamic SELECT query with dynamic Join and Where conditions.
I have a requirement of creating such a query in an Utility Class, and i have written the code. But its throwing my sysntax errors.
Please let me know where am I going wrong OR is it really possible to create such a dynamic Query??
    SELECT (FIELDS) INTO TABLE IT_TABLES
      FROM ( (ME->TABLE1) inner join ( me->table2 )
      on ( on_condition ) )
      WHERE (me->where_fields).
Ags.

It worked for me in a following way:
select * into corresponding fields of table <result_table>
        from (join_string)
        where (l_where).
Where the contents of join_string were dynamically build using concatenation. So it will be something like
concatenate ME->TABLE1 'as a INNER JOIN' me->table2 'as b ON (' into join_string separated by space.
<...>
add here matching/reference colums, something like
concatenate 'a~' me->TABLE1_JOIN_COL into temp1.
concatenate 'b~' me->TABLE2_JOIN_COL into temp2.
concatenate join_string temp1 '=' temp2 into join_string separated by space.
<...>
concatenate join_string ')' into join_string separated by space.
And then use similar approach for l_where variable.

I need to add a single field from with_item table . need to write select query with reference to company code , account doc no , fiscal year

I need to add a single field from with_item table . need to write select query with reference to company code , account doc no , fiscal year

Hi Arun ,
Can you explain little bit more ??
what is account doc no?
what are the transactions should be displayed in your output??
-Rajesh N

How to re-write this big SELECT Query with INNER JOINs?

Hi Experts
I have a performance killer SELECT query with an inner join of 3 tables u2013 VBAP, VBAK and VBEP together, which populates records to an internal table INT_COLL_ORD. Based on these records selected, in another SELECT query, records are fetched from VBUK table to the internal table INT_VBUK.
SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV D~AUART E~ETTYP E~EDATU
INTO TABLE INT_TAB_RES
FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBAK AS D
ON D~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND D~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
INNER JOIN VBEP AS E
ON E~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND E~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND E~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
WHERE A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
       D~auart in s_auart AND
       D~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
       D~vbtyp eq 'C'     AND
       ( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
       OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
       A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
       A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
       A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
       E~ETENR EQ '1'.
SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_TAB_RES COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
CHECK NOT INT_TAB_RES [] IS INITIAL.
SELECT VBELN UVALL CMGST INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
FROM VBUK FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_TAB_RES
WHERE VBELN = INT_TAB_RES-VBELN AND UVALL NE 'A'.
Now, the requirement is:
I want to split this query. Like, first join VBAK and VBUK first. With this selection, go to the inner join of VBAP and VBEP (on key VBELN) to get the results. How can I re-write this Query?
Please help.
Thx n Rgds

Hi Nagraj
As of your suggestion, I have re-written the query as below:
* Declarations
TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_COLL_ORD,
        VBELN LIKE VBAK-VBELN,
        POSNR LIKE VBUP-POSNR,
        MATNR LIKE VBAP-MATNR,
        KWMENG LIKE VBAP-KWMENG,
        KBMENG LIKE VBAP-KBMENG,
        ERDAT LIKE VBAK-ERDAT,
        ERZET LIKE VBAK-ERZET,
        PSTYV LIKE VBAP-PSTYV,
        AUART LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Calready exists in type
        ETTYP LIKE VBEP-ETTYP,
        EDATU LIKE VBEP-EDATU.
TYPES: END OF TYP_COLL_ORD.
DATA: INT_COLL_ORD TYPE TABLE OF TYP_COLL_ORD WITH HEADER LINE.
TYPES: BEGIN OF TYP_VBUK,
        AUART LIKE VBAK-AUART, u201Chave added this field
        VBELN LIKE VBUK-VBELN,
        UVALL LIKE VBUK-UVALL,
        CMGST LIKE VBUK-CMGST.
TYPES: END OF TYP_VBUK.
DATA: INT_VBUK TYPE TABLE OF TYP_VBUK WITH HEADER LINE.
*QUERY#1 u2013 for VBAK & VBUK Join
SELECT A~AUART B~VBELN B~UVALL B~CMGST
INTO TABLE INT_VBUK
FROM VBAK AS A INNER JOIN VBUK AS B
ON A~VBELN EQ B~VBELN
WHERE A~VBELN IN s_VBELN AND
A~auart in s_auart AND
A~vkorg in s_vkorg AND
A~vbtyp eq 'C' AND
B~UVALL NE 'A'.
IF NOT INT_VBUK[] IS INITIAL.
SORT INT_VBUK BY VBELN.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_VBUK COMPARING VBELN.
*QUERY#2 u2013 for VBAP & VBEP Join
SELECT A~VBELN A~POSNR A~MATNR A~KWMENG A~KBMENG A~ERDAT A~ERZET A~PSTYV B~ETTYP B~EDATU
INTO TABLE INT_COLL_ORD
FROM VBAP AS A INNER JOIN VBEP AS B
ON B~VBELN EQ A~VBELN AND B~POSNR EQ A~POSNR AND B~MANDT EQ A~MANDT
FOR ALL ENTRIES IN INT_VBUK
WHERE A~VBELN = INT_VBUK-VBELN AND
( ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_sp AND zz_msposnr NE 0 AND kbmeng EQ 0 )
OR ( matnr LIKE c_prefix_fp AND kwmeng NE A~kbmeng ) ) AND
A~ABGRU EQ SPACE AND
A~MTVFP IN R_MTVFP AND
A~PRCTR IN R_PRCT AND
B~ETENR EQ '1'.
ENDIF.
SORT INT_COLL_ORD BY VBELN POSNR ETTYP.
DELETE ADJACENT DUPLICATES FROM INT_COLL_ORD
    COMPARING VBELN POSNR.
CHECK NOT INT_COLL_ORD[] IS INITIAL.
LOOP AT INT_COLL_ORD.
    CLEAR: L_MTART,L_ATPPR,L_ETTYP.
    IF L_PREVIOUS_ETTYP NE INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP OR
      L_PREVIOUS_AUART NE INT_COLL_ORD-AUART.
      READ TABLE INT_OVRCTL WITH KEY AUART = INT_COLL_ORD-AUART ETTYP = INT_COLL_ORD-ETTYP.
      CHECK SY-SUBRC NE 0.
Now, the issue is:
Please note that declaration for INT_COLL_ORD has a field AUART, which is used in further parts of program (see the statement just above)
But, since neither VBAP nor VBEP contains AUART field, it cannot be fetched through the QUERY#2. So this value is not populated into INT_COLL_ORD through SELECT Query.
Since this field is used in later part of program & that the internal table has no value for this field, it dumps!!
How to include this value into the INT_COLL_ORD?
Plz suggest....

Select query with UNION clause in database adapter

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for