Self adjusting levels

I have a video that was, it looks like, recorded without lighting and with rapid cloud formation changes going on outside. The video varies from bright enough to too dark, with this going up and down many times in this ten minute clip.
Is there a video filter that will constantly adjust the brightness of the image to get it back to the same as it was at the start of the timeline?

Now, in reality lighting does this. And if you don't have three grips trucks full of equipment, and a team of grips and gaffers, there really is no way to control it. Seeing the light shift like that is believeable to me. But, do you mean that it doesn't shift WHILE you are shooting, but say Take 1 is overcast, and take 4 is in bright sunlight, and you are trying to intercut the two? Because if the lighting shifts while you are on the subject, that isn't too distracting...to me anyway.
No more NEGATIVE voting. That went away years ago. Probably helped Cookman remain one of the top helpers. If it was still in use, he'd be DEEP in the cellar.
Shane

Similar Messages

  • How to use "Adjustment Level " in automatic adjustments rule

    Now we are setting up BPC for legal consolidation.
    we use BPC 7.0MS SP4 Version.
    I want to use some result of automatic adjustment rules for source data, so I tried to use adjustment level in automatic adjustments rules.
    I was setting up A rule's (to use source data) adjustment level is 0 and B rule's level is 1,
    the result of SPRUNCONSO were "Error" CSD-150 and CSD-160.
    Please let me know how to use adjustment level option.
    Thanks.
    Edited by: tae-youn.kim on Dec 14, 2009 3:20 AM

    Hello :
    CSD-150
    Check the method between METHOD Table and your ownership Cube. Check your Rules between the RULES Table and The ELIM Table. Check The INTCo.
    Regards,
    SANJAY

  • FUTA Changes Effective 1st July 2011 - Not self Adjusting***Critical

    Hello
    As we know the FUTA rate was chnaged effective 1st July 2011 from 0.8% to 0.6%(after SUTA offset), we have noticed that currently in the SAP the FUTA contribution is not self adjusting.
    As illustrated in below example
    OCT 2011  Earnings 2008.13(FUTA paid at old Rate 0.08%-16.07)
    NOV 2011 Earnings 2008.13(FUTA paid at old Rate 0.08%-16.07)
    After November payroll new FUTA rate has been  implemented.SAP calculation as below
    DEC 2011 Earnings 7008.13(FUTA paid at new Rate 0.06%-16.07)
    Dec calculation = 7000-4016.26= 2983.74*0.006=17.90
    As you can see employee has contibuted 50.04(16.0716.0717.90) which is more than the minimum of 42 USD(7000*.006)
    Could you please confirm if this is correct behaviour? I remember checkin with BSI back in July and they confirmed that the self adjusting should happen and employee should not contribute more than 42
    Can you please confirm
    Regards
    Ajay

    Not sure if this is the same problem, but BSI posted a fix to the FUTA calculation in the tax update bulletin immediately following the one that had the FUTA tax adjustment. We went several weeks without the fix and discovered problems similar to what you describe. In our case we had to apply the subsequent TUB to fix the calculation, and then retro everyone back that had the problem. It was a major pain, but the retro solved it.
    We did take care of this all in 2011, so I'm not sure if your cross-year situation adds further complexity.
    Jay

  • Self-adjusting tax types for the US

    Hi everyone,
    In the US, there are 89 tax types.  I know that UI and FICA taxes are self-adjusting.  How do I find out if say tax type 51 - ee occupation tax is self-adjusting?  This could tax authority dependent because say for tax type 51, one state may have a max/limit but another state may not.
    Is there a way I can find this out?
    Regards,
    Jasper

    Hi there,
    Currently, in the standard system, the following tax types have been
    hard-coded within U.S. payroll processing to self-adjust.
           Tax Type          Description
              07             State Unemployment Insurance Tax
              08             Social Charge Tax
              09             Employer Special Payroll Tax
              10             Employer Unemployment Tax
              11             Employer Debt Repayment Tax
              13             Er Emplmt Security Enhancmt Tx
              14             Er Re-Emplmt Placemt Tx
              15             Er Job Devmt Assessmt Tx
              16             Employment Training Tax
              17             Employer Health Insurance Tax
              18             Employer Workforce Devlmt Tx
              28             Er Combined WF&SWF/HC/DI Tax
              29             Special Admin Reserve Fund Tax
              36             Workforce Enhancement Fee
              37             Administrative Contingency Fund Tax
              38             Employer Investment Fee
              39             Employment Administration Fund
              47             Joint Economic Dev. District
    You may wish to review SAP note 1259877 in order to obtain more details on the feature 10STT which allows you to configure your self adjusting tax types

  • Restoring Adjustment Levels Auto Color Corr Options

    I entered the following key sequence:
    Adjustments Panel | Levels | Alt-Click Auto | Find Dark & Light Colors | Snap Neutral Midtones | Midtones
    After keying in this sequence and making adjustments to my photo, I inadvertently hit one too many OKs as I was exiting and PS changed my defaults. They now read: H: 55, S:0, B: 0, R: 128, G: 128 and B: 128.
    How can I reset these values to their default settings? Or could someone tell me what they should be?
    Thank you very much ... in advance.
    Steve

    Mark,
    I'm looking to confirm that these are the correct values; otherwise, whenever I use an Adjustment Levels correction, my pictures will be thrown off by my erroneous default values. I think these are now correct, but I would like to confirm.

  • Adjustment levels

    Many times when I make a new adjustment level,  CS6 defaults to "Levels" even though I had selected "Threshold" or Color Balance".
      I am trying to do an accurate color adjustment using the "Threshold" darkest and lightest sample point, new layer-50% grey "Difference" mode, then back to "Threshold"
    to find grey point. Having marked these points, I go to "Curves" and select my points with the appropriate eye dropper tool.
    This technique worked flawlessly in

    Try resetting your preferences as described in the FAQ.
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/375776?tstart=0
    You either have to physically delete (or rename) the preference files or, if using the Alt, Ctrl, and Shift method, be sure that you get a confirmation dialog.
    This resets all settings in Photoshop to factory defaults.
    A complete uninstall/re-install will not affect the preferences and a corrupt file there may be causing the problem.

  • Adjustment Level Error

    Hi all
    I have got consolidation rules using the adjustment rules table but when I try to order this rules with Adjustment level field, the stored procedure produces the error.
    If I only put "1" in one rule the package works fine when I make a consolidation with  a group with a perimeter with all entities, but when I select groups with a  perimeter with less entities the consolidation package doesn't works. The only way is quit  the  "1" from the automatic adjustment rule
    Execute formulasError
    SPRunConso Version 7.5.105
    ERROR CSD-150 Problem extracting Data : C_REPART
    ERROR CSD-160 Problem extracting Data : C_CONSO
    10000051 - 340 Rows Calculated
    10000051 - 0 Rows Updated
    I saw other post and have the same problem
    Do you have any idea?
    Thanks in advance

    Hi Nilanjan
    I have 2 rules in the Automatic adjustments table:
    In short, Rule 1 should be executed first as Rule 2 should be based on the results of rule 1.
    Rule 1:  Non Group part cancellation for Proportionate units
    Adjustment level = 0
    Adjustment type = Proportional
    Rule 2:  Inter-company elimination
    Here the adjustment level = 1
    Adjustment type = Generic
    When i run the  following stored procedure:
    *RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCONSO(%APP%, %CATEGORY_SET%,%CONSOSCOPE_SET%, %SCOPETABLE%,%LOGTABLE%)
    The correct results are posted but the package displays as failed with the error message as per the first message in this thread.
    The help states the following, which is exactly what i need:
    Adjustment level
    This field must contain an integer value ranging from 0 to 99 and can be used to order the sequence of execution of the various ELIM rules, if desired.

  • Automatic adjustments - Adjustment level not working

    Hi all
    I have got some basic consolidation rules using the rules tables but as soon as i try and control the order in which the rules are executed using the Automatic adjustments - Adjustment level field, the stored procedure produces the error below:
    Any help would be appreciated
    Byron
    TOTAL STEPS  1
    1. Execute formulas:           Failed  in 6 sec.
    2. Legal Consolidation:        completed  in 6 sec.
    [Selection]
    (Member Selection)
    Category: ACTUAL
    Time: 2010.P16
    ConsoScope: C_ENGEN
    [Messages]
    Execute formulasError
    SPRunConso Version 7.0.116
    Warning : Nothing Extract From Ownership for OPENING Period
    *ERROR* CSD-150 Problem extracting Data : C_REPART
    *ERROR* CSD-160 Problem extracting Data : C_CONSO
    *ERROR* CSD-150 Problem extracting Data : C_REPART
    *ERROR* CSD-160 Problem extracting Data : C_CONSO
    10000015 - 2498 Rows Calculated
    10000015 - 0 Rows Updated

    Hi Nilanjan
    I have 2 rules in the Automatic adjustments table:
    In short, Rule 1 should be executed first as Rule 2 should be based on the results of rule 1.
    Rule 1:  Non Group part cancellation for Proportionate units
    Adjustment level = 0
    Adjustment type = Proportional
    Rule 2:  Inter-company elimination
    Here the adjustment level = 1
    Adjustment type = Generic
    When i run the  following stored procedure:
    *RUN_STORED_PROCEDURE = SPRUNCONSO(%APP%, %CATEGORY_SET%,%CONSOSCOPE_SET%, %SCOPETABLE%,%LOGTABLE%)
    The correct results are posted but the package displays as failed with the error message as per the first message in this thread.
    The help states the following, which is exactly what i need:
    Adjustment level
    This field must contain an integer value ranging from 0 to 99 and can be used to order the sequence of execution of the various ELIM rules, if desired.

  • Adjust Levels/Brightness/Contrast on 200pp PDF

    I have a PDF document of scanned documents and all the scans are under-exposed. I need to adjust levels/contrast/brightness on all the pages. For a start I want to apply the same set of changes to every page of the PDF. I'll then place the PDF pages onto InDesign Pages and Print as a booklet to get pagination for sadle stiching using the included Applescript.
    Is there and automated way I can process all the pages in PS and apply a standard set of changes to all the pages and then save the document including the page number so as I can reassemble as a single document in Acrobat to then import to InDesign using the aforementioned Applescript?

    You could creat an action to do the required changes and use http://www.scriptsrus.talktalk.net/Pdfprocessor.htm to run the action on all the pages.

  • Self adjusting input level on built in mic?

    both my gf and i are having this problem. when we adjust the input level for the internal mic, it adjusts itself back to max or near max. what is causing this and how do we get it to stop?? she has a MB, 2.16, mac osX 10.4.7. thanks.

    anybody?

  • Self adjusting input level?

    my bf & I tried to set the input level of the built in mic but as we talk it creeps itself back up to maximum & causes feedback since the speakers are so close to the mic. i have a macbook & he has a macbook pro. we've tried using headsets & headphones & getting ticked because there's always something wrong! either there's feedback or one of us is too soft. any suggestions?
    Macbook, MacBook Pro   Mac OS X (10.4.7)  

    Hi Kirsty,
    I find that may System Preferences> Sound > Input volume adjusts back to a lower setting on every chat.
    I have not found where this is set to be a permanent setting to where I want.
    s
    3:46 PM Sunday; September 3, 2006

  • Adjusting Levels not working, please help. Photoshop CS3

    Anyone have an answer for me? Tech support NOT helpful unless I dish out even more money! Using Photoshop CS3. I am trying to adjust the levels on a very simple bitonal scan from PDF. When I adjust them by going to, Image, adjustments, levels, the preview of it works and it shows what I want, but when I hit OK, it dissapears. If I go to Layers, New Adjustment Layer, Levels, it shows up fine until I save it.. I am trying to save it as a PDF file, and I am saving it with Adobe 6 (1.5) because of compatibility issues (so I've read), it should save layers. But its not saving. Or maybe it's not opening in my Adobe Acrobat? is there an update I need or something? Is there a step I am missing? is anyone else having this problem? Even so, the Level adjust should work regularly while in PS CS3.
    THANK YOU!!

    make sure you're viewing the preview at 100% zoom. any other zoom level isn't going to give you a true representation of the adjustment you're making...

  • Preliminary dialogs in adjustment levels

    I use Photioshop CS on a Mac G4 (PPC) with OS 10.4.11.
    This is a very elementary question, I am afraid, but I nevertheless hope that someone will point me in the right direction.
    If I choose Image/Adjustments/Levels, what I see straight away is the Levels dialog with its histogram and controls. But if I choose Layers/New adjustment layer/Levels, I first see a dialog as shown in my first example below.
    If I then click on 'Color' it expands to my second example.below.
    I have experimented with choosing different colours in the second drop-down menu, and cannot see any effects on what I do subsequently in the main Levels dialog or on the image I am editing. (A similar situation obtains if I select a Hue and Saturation adjustment layer.)
    I have searched Photoshop Help and a large book on Photoshop that I have in my possession, but I cannot discover any explanations of these preliminary dialogs and what they are for. I should be most grateful for any advice.

    Sounds like you are in CS5 not CS.
    Look for the palette called adjustment, which should automatically pop up when creating adjsutment layers. If not window >> adjustment.

  • Adjustment Levels Bug

    Hi, i'm using cs3 and i've got a weird error with adjusting the levels of an image.
    All i have done is create a black background layer, added some noise, then i want to edit the levels.  Unfortunately the image changes as per preview but whatever i change the settings to, it reverts back to the orginal set up when i press ok.
    I have literally no idea what is going on and why, more to the point.  Really frustrating.
    Please help.
    Thanks

    Try resetting your preferences as described in the FAQ.
    http://forums.adobe.com/thread/375776?tstart=0
    You either have to physically delete (or rename) the preference files or, if using the Alt, Ctrl, and Shift method, be sure that you get a confirmation dialog.
    This resets all settings in Photoshop to factory defaults.
    A complete uninstall/re-install will not affect the preferences and a corrupt file there may be causing the problem.

  • Volume Adjustment - Level it off...

    Is this possible? (I'm just brand spankin new to audio recording and this software)
    I recorded Matt 4 different times on 4 tracks for a V.O. I took bits of each take that I liked and made one final piece... but sometimes I notice that track 2's audio was a little louder than track 4's...
    In my compiled final track, is there a way for Soundtrack to make all clips the same audio level?
    If not... I guess I need to know how to go under master volume and put keyframes in to adjust every track to track cut I made.... I hope this makes sense.
    If you have a clue and could help me out, you would be the bomb diggity. Thanks,
    Jer

    Thanks man. That's exactly what I needed.
    Jer

Maybe you are looking for