Send Message SOAP to Proxy failed - No standard agreement found for

Hello to all,
we have a SOAP to Proxy scenario.
The Service Interface have 6 Operations.
When I implement 2 Operation it works fine. Now I have implemented all Operation.
When I send a request I get following Error:
I have checked the Interface determination. It is ok. I have Sender, Receiver and all Operations.
Where could be the error?
Please help us.
Thanks and regards
Martin
Edited by: Martin Weidauer on Nov 9, 2010 4:45 PM
Edited by: Martin Weidauer on Nov 9, 2010 4:47 PM

Martin,
Please perform the following..
1) Please go thru this link.
Re: Error CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_ERROR in SXMB_MONI
2) Perform a full CPACache refresh using PIDIRUSER.
http://XiHost:Port/CPACache/refresh?mode=full
3) Kindly check Note No.'s in service market place ::
1284103, 1278244, 1278273 .
Just perform and let me know...
Regards
Veeru

Similar Messages

No standard agreement found for BS_A ,, BS_B

Hi Experts,
We are getting a very common error " No standard agreement found for BS_A ,, BS_B https://abc.com,SIOA_forcast,,,
There interface was succsfully executing few days back.
Here are some information abount the interafce.
1) JMS to IDOC
2) IDoc control record mapping
When i checked the pipe line steps in MONI , starngely it is showing
SAME SENDER interface name SIOA_forcast in sender and receiver interface . And thus it got failed in reciver agreent. I could not see the Idoc and IDoc namespace
I have searched in SDN but, did not get any clear picture
I have done the following
1) checked SXI_CAHCE and cahche instance if every object.
All objects are up -to-date
2) Deleted and recreated ID objects
3) Check the interfaces in message mapping , operation mapping , interface determination etc..., all are looking fine.
DId anyone faced this issue before.
I have asked basis for a full refresh , but i am not confident wheather that will solve the issue or not.
Please provide your valuable input and let me understand the issue.

Hi Sam
Was anything changed during last few days?
PI is not able to determine receiver interface and keeps sender inteface details. For this reason it can't find receiver agreement.
Check that your interface determination object is correct and perform a full cache refresh.
Also copy your message payload from SXMB_MONI and use the test tool (Tools -> Test configuration) in ID.
Regards,
Giuseppe

No standard agreement found for receiver

HI,
I am doing File to Multiple files (3 )bases on Identifer
Each and Every File of receiver has Different Communication component.
I am doing Multimapping to split based on the condition.
1) Created 1 Sender Agreement
2) Created 1 Receiver Determination Given all the receiver component (3) in configured receivers
3) Created 1 Interface Determination , called the Operation mapping which contains all the 3 Service interfaces including Multimapping.
4) Created 3 Receiver communication channels.
But I am getting Following error
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_ERROR</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>-TR</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>-XXX_60,http://TEST</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText>No standard agreement found for , TR, , XXX_60, http://test,
Thanks in advance

Hi Sap pixi ,
Try to create the scenario like this ,
1) Create 1 Sender Agreement
2) Create 1 Receiver Determinationwith all the receiver components (3) in configured receivers along with the conditions.
3) Create 3 Interface Determination .
4)3 mappings ,3 Operation mapping , 3 Service interfaces .
4) Create 3 Receiver communication channels.
Try the above scenario as the multi-mapping is not working for you,I tried the same for two different communication components, with no conditions in receiver determination and its working fine .
Regards,
Lavanya.B

Error: No standard agreement found for....

Hello,
I've been fighting during hours with this error. I'm using PI 7.1 ehp 1 in a SOAP to RFC scenario and I can't find why this is happening.
In the scenario everything it's ok. If I go to the receiver determination I can see the interface determination, receiver agreement and receiver communication channel but when I test the scenario PI isn't capable to determine the receiver interface (the system determines that the receiver interface is the sender interface)... It doesn't matter if I use a SOAP client or I use the RWB tool to test it directly to the IE.
I've refreshed all the caches, and I created allt the scenario again but the problem is still there...
Can it be a problem with this last PI version?

Thank you Rajesh,
I've tested the configuration in ID and it's much more clear there. The problem is that the system didn't found any interface determination... and then it uses the sender interface as receiver interface... But it has no sense because if I go to the receiver determination object I can see how PI detects the interface determination for that receiver...
<Trace level="1" type="B">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T"> Cache Content is up to date </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">...There is no Interface Determination configured for receiver party and receiver service "RECEIVER" </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Check conditions for (Inb: Party Srvc If) "RECEIVER" "OUT INTERFACE" </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">...valid InbIf without Condition: "IN INTERFACE" </Trace>
<Trace level="2" type="T">Number of receiving Interfaces:1 </Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="E">CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV</Trace>

Outbound binding exception: No standard agreement found

Hi ,
I have 2 asynchronous FILE to IDOC scenarios. These scenario work fine most of the times but strangely some times it gives the error OUTBOUND_BINDING_NOT_FOUND (outbound binding exception: No standard agreement found for , <out_BS>, , <IN_BS>, <http://ns>, <Query_Out>)
sxmb_moni shows that in the errored messages, the interface names in the sender and receiver side are same
i.e. Outbound interface "Query_Out", but in the successful messages the interface name in the sender is "Query_Out" and in receiver is "FIDCC1_FIDCCP02".
The Scenarios were working until today when i tested it again, no changes were made to it. Every other Scenario is working except these 2 interfaces housing the same logic.
I have checked for errors in cache but none were there.
Thanks in advance.
Amith

Hi Amith
Check this link and find out where you have done mistake
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards
Dheeraj

SAP PI Error: No standard agreement found

Hi SAP experts,
Hope you can give advise on what is missing/error in my SAP PI configurations, why I am encountering this specific error,
<SAP:AdditionalText>No standard agreement found for , SAPR/3, P_GDDXI, S_HTTP, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, IDOC Type </SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:Stack>Problem occurred in receiver agreement for sender -SAPR/3 to receiver P_GDDXI-S_HTTP,urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages.IDOC Type: No standard agreement found for , SAPR/3, P_GDDXI, S_HTTP, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, IDOC Type</SAP:Stack>
I've configured already the receiver agreement but it seems there is still an error.
Thanks in advance!
Godofredo

You might be using a wrong XML structure for which there is no Integration Directory objects exist especially Receiver Determination.
Make sure your sender agreement is right and hooked up to a correct communication channel.
Try testing this first in the Integration Directory Test tool before sending an actual message?
If you are still having issues then please provide the message flow ex. IDoc to File, Idoc to HTTP etc.

Error while executing a JDBC to Idoc scenario : No standard agreement found

Hello SAP PI Gurus,
I am having a JDBC to idoc Scenario .And the interface is running at 10 min of duration.
<SAP:AdditionalText>No standard agreement found for ,
BS_EXT_CTBSREPDB, , BS_ERPQAS_QE1_320, http://XYZ.com/FI/FI_FI_01/Charges, FIDCC2</SAP:AdditionalText>.
While i test the configuration...i get an error in reciever agreement as mentioned above.
Can you pls help me in resolving this issue.
Regards,
Ravi

Hi,
I think the problem is with namespace....for IDOC the namespace will be "urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages"...but in your case it is different.....i.e http:....etc.....please check whether you 've used the same IDOC withe above mentioned namespace in all the configuration objects like interface determination, receiveragreement etc.....
Thanks
Priyanka

No standard agreement found Error.

Hi i am working on File to IDOC scenario and i am getting the below error.
"No standard agreement found for , D_XXX_YY, B_XXX, ECC1800".
I deleted all my Config objects and recreated and reactivated.cache is up to date but still no use.
When i test this in ID test confguration.It works fine. we are using parties here.
could some one please help me out.really appreacite your help.
Regards

Hi,
try creating your receiver agreement with virtual communication channels.
You can also try re-activating your receiver and interface determination objects. Also check if you are using correct (same) namespace for receiver and interface determination objects. You might want to have all objects in same namespace.
For IDoc scenarios, Imported IDoc itself acts as a interface. So you need not create a message interface on the IDoc side. This interface would correspond to standard sap namespace.
Do a complete cache refresh.
If this did not help, check the SAP Note: 832965
Also, check this link : /people/venugopalarao.immadisetty/blog/2007/01/24/troubleshooting-file-to-idoc-scenario-in-xi helps you to troubleshoot File-IDOC scenarios.
Thanks,

ERROR in PI : No sender agreement found for , , , , ,

Hello everybody,
i'm working with SAP PI 7.1
it's a new installation.
I created the first easy interface JDBC-Pi-File.
when i activate the CC i don't see any message in SXMB_MONI but in RWM i see the messages in Waiting status and when i look inside i see the follow error:
SOAPFAULT received from Integration Server. ErrorCode/Category: XIServer/INBOUND_BINDING_ERROR; Params: BS_CSIS_DEV, http://xxxx.com/test, SI_DB2SP_DOCUMENTS_AA_02; AdditionalText: null; ApplicationFaultMessage: null; ErrorStack: Error in sender agreement for party , service BS_CSIS_DEV, interface namespace http://xxx.com/test interface SI_DB2SP_DOCUMENTS_AA_02 No sender agreement found for , , , , ,
1-Configuration is ok. I create all steps and sender Agreement exist
2-end point http://yyyyy:50100/sap/xi/engine?type=entry is correct and the same in SLD and sxmb_adm -> Integration Engine Configuration
3-i suppose 50100 port is correct because when i try to use 8010 port i have a different error.
4- i alreadi used CPA cache refresh and SXI_CACHE.
Any suggestion?
thanks

after 20 minuts i retry.
Now the error message is changed:
Transmitting the message to endpoint http://yyyyyy:8010/sap/xi/engine?type=entry using connection JDBC_http://sap.com/xi/XI/System failed, due to: com.sap.engine.interfaces.messaging.api.exception.MessagingException: Error transmitting the message over HTTP. Reason: java.net.ConnectException: Connection refused.
Edited by: apederiva on Aug 25, 2010 11:35 AM

CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND and No receiver agreement found for Sender

Hi,
I had imported an RFC in to two different SWCV. In ID I'm able to see the RFC interface listed under one of the business systems but not in the other. Please help me out with this.
When i tested the scenario i got this error.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="OUTBINDING">CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_NOT_FOUND</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>-WB_APDRP_DEV_ISU_200</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>-WB_APDRP_DEV_CCC,urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZPI_CONSUMER_PAYMENT_BILL_DATA</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender -WB_APDRP_DEV_ISU_200 to receiver -WB_APDRP_DEV_CCC,urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions.ZPI_CONSUMER_PAYMENT_BILL_DATA</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
I cleared the cache using SXI_CACHE and http://Server Name:Port/CPACache/refresh?mode=full and still got this error. Can someone explain me about this..
Regards
Satt

Hi ,
This error generally Comes when aggrements are Not There in ID.
1. Check if all the Objects in ID are activated.
2. First test your Configuration Objects IN ID Only ( Tools - test Configuration )
if this gets Successful , Please tell...
Regards
Prabhat Sharma.

IDOC to FTP File - Error : SAP:Stack No receiver agreement found for send

Hello Friends,
I need to configure a senario Idoc to FTP File, Í did required settings in R3 and in PI... , did mapping and configuratino in PI... and when I send my idoc I got error msg in monitor
<SAP:Stack>No receiver agreement found for sender ,BMG_ASN_File_Component to receiver ,GTN_224,http://adis-bmg.de/asn,SI_BMG_ASN</SAP:Stack>
I search the fourm but did not got my answer, me just a bit confused...
In my senario I have having followings:
1. Bussiness System ( RFT : sender R3 system). ( I have define a party and make a connection under Idoc Partner )
2. Bussiness Component ( ZTEST_COMP as on Reciever side is File Server, so I define the reciver as bussiness component )
3. Communicatin Channel
    File with protocol FTP having communicatin component as my Bussiness Component ( reciver ). there I defied the required info for FTP
4. Reciever Determination
    Sender:
    - RFT
    - Idoc-Interface
    - urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
   Reciever
    communication party = space
    communicatin component = ZTEST_COMP
    Configure Reciever:
   There I again define the communication component as ( ZTEST_COMP)
5. Interface Determination
    -RFT
    - Idoc-Interface
    - urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages
   Reviever:
    ZTEST_COMP
and define the mapping which I did in design ( although I have seen some threads where mentioned we dont need maaping in this case ) ?
6. Reciver agrement
sender:
- RFT
Reviver:
- ZTEST_COMP
- SI interface ( SI_BMG_ASN )
- http://test-etc.de/asn
and included my CC for file .....
Now when I send Idoc I got error msg that Reciver is not found : am I dong something wrong ? do I have to defien a bussiness system instead of Bussiness Component ?
Pls suggest...

( I have define a party and make a connection under Idoc Partner
Do you really need a party in your communication? Should it not be a partly-less communication.
In the receiver agreement ensure that you have included the inbound message interface.
communication party = space
No need to give any space.
In the Interface Determination i hope that you have included the receiver meessage interface and then the corresponding Interface Mapping.
If still not works then make some dummy changes and again activate....correspondingly check the cache status of the ID-objects
Regards,
Abhishek.

CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_ERROR , No standard aggrement found for ,

Hello,
I have a scenario XI-to-IDOC. I created a Service Interface and publish them as a Web Service.
I created a WSDL file from the Integration Builder(Configuration) and When I test the WSDL with the XML Spy, I got a following error message,
CO_TXT_OUTBINDING_ERROR , No standard aggrement found for , ...
But when I test with PI tool (the Component Monitoring>Integration Engine>Test Message)
The message is processed successfully.
And there is a differences between the two messages in the message monitoring. The Receiver Namespace and The Receiver Interface are different.
Message with Successful: The Receiver name and interface are name of IDOC
Message with Error:The Receiver name and interface is name of Service Interface.
And My Integration Configuration is following.
1. One Receiver Determination
2. One Interface Determination
3. One Receiver Agreement
What should I do for that error?
Thanx for your help..
Hasan

Hello, I discovered something about the problem,
My Service Interface has operations which have the type of external message.
I created data type and message type then I used the message type for that operation instead of external message.
I also changed source of message mapping which was the type of external message. I changed it as a message type.
Then it works.
But I have to use the external message. because my wsdl has a special characters. Which includes "-". I cannot create Data type includes "-".
Is there a solution for this..
Thanx.

Send message with abap proxy client

I'm trying to send message to XI, but no message in sxmb_moni.
I have created logical port with LPCONFIG.
ABAP code
REPORT Z_HTTP_SEND.
DATA:
* Reference variables for proxy and exception class
lo_clientProxy     TYPE REF TO ZPCO_MI_COMPANY_OB,
lo_sys_exception   TYPE REF TO cx_ai_system_fault,
* Structures to set and get message content
   ls_request         TYPE ZPMT_COMPANY_ID,
   ls_response        TYPE ZPMT_COMPANY_DETAILS.
*Complete the structure ls_request for the request message.
*DATA: zmt_id type ZPMT_COMPANY_ID,
*zdt_id type ZPDT_COMPANY_ID,
*z_id_tab type ZPCOMPANY_ID_TAB,
*z_id type ZPCOMPANY_ID.
*z_id-COMPANY_ID = '3000'.
*append z_id to z_id_tab.
* zdt_id-RECORD = z_id_tab.
*zmt_id-MT_COMPANY_ID = zdt_id.
DATA tab TYPE ZPCOMPANY_ID_TAB WITH HEADER LINE.
tab-COMPANY_ID = '3000'.
APPEND tab.
ls_request-MT_COMPANY_ID-RECORD = tab[].
TRY.
* create proxy client
*CREATE OBJECT lo_clientProxy( u2018LOGICAL_PORT_NAMEu2019 ).
    CREATE OBJECT lo_clientProxy.
* do synchronous client proxy call
    CALL METHOD lo_clientProxy->execute_synchronous
             EXPORTING output = ls_request
             IMPORTING input   = ls_response.
    CATCH cx_ai_system_fault INTO lo_sys_exception.
*   Error handling
ENDTRY.
Any ideas? Thanks very much,

Hi,
Proxies communicate with the XI server by means of native SOAP calls over HTTP .RFC does not, so you have to convert from SOAP to RFC calls and vice versa. So XML conversion is required.
ABAP Proxies uses Webservice and Http Protocols. And if you use RFC it is mainly meant for Sync. call. But Proxies is used for both Sync and Async.
If you use ABAP Proxy , you can reduce the overhead calling the function again and again.
How do you activate ABAP Proxies? - Activate Proxy
ABAP Server Proxies - ABAP Server Proxy
ABAP Proxies in XI(Client Proxy) - ABAP Client Proxy
Re: JDBC Sender select/update problem
If u generate proxy for outbound interface then its client proxy and for inbound interface its server proxy.
In client proxy u can call the method to send messages but u can't modify it but in server proxy its possible to write a user code within the method to execute proxy.
CLIENT PROXY:
A WSDL description from a UDDI server (or an Internet page) is usually used to make a service executable in the Internet and to describe the interface of this service. You require a client proxy and not a server proxy to call this service by using the Web service infrastructure.
SERVER PROXY:
You can only generate ABAP server proxies from a WSDL description if they originate in the Integration Repository.You can also generate server proxies for Java and client proxies for ABAP from message interfaces.
s refer these doc about ABAP proxy ..
How do you activate ABAP Proxies? - Activate Proxy
ABAP Server Proxies - ABAP Server Proxy
ABAP Proxies in XI(Client Proxy) - ABAP Client Proxy
Re: JDBC Sender select/update problem
ABAP Server Proxies
How do you activate ABAP Proxies?
ABAP Proxies in XI(Client Proxy)
File to R/3 via ABAP Proxy
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/48/d5a1fe5f317a4e8e35801ed2c88246/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/ba/f21a403233dd5fe10000000a155106/frameset.htm
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/41e08c90-0201-0010-9197-d8774336ea78
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f0ae9874-109c-2910-f48a-e91f0cdd1c81
Smarter Approach for coding ABAP Proxies
regards,
Surya

No Receiver agreement found for Sender

Hello,
I have a scenario like this : sending an IDoc from R/3 4.6c to R/3 4.7 through XI 3.0.
I am struck up with the follwoing Error in SXMB_MONI
"outbound binding exception: No outbound binding found for , R46, , ENT, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, ORDERS.ORDERS04"
The Complete TRACE is as follows:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
- 
- <SAP:Trace xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_INBOUND_XMB" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">ALE-AUDIT-IDoc-Inbound Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Inbound-Handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Syntax-Check-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">IDoc-Tunnel-Flag X</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queueid</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="IDX_IDOC_TO_XML">
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get the Metadata for port SAPR46</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Convert Segment-Definitions to Types</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Make Syntax check of actual Idoc</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Set Receiver Routing-object</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-SET_IDOC" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Exit Function IDX_INBOUND_XMB</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-GETBLOBDATA">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-ITAB_TO_BINARY" />
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">COMMIT is expected by application !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-ENTER_XMS" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-SET_START_PIPELINE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMBCONF-SXMB_GET_XMB_USE" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_TROUBLESHOOT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">XMB entry processing</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">* *</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">****************************************************</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_UC_EXECUTE" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Message-GUID = F0EAB201EEA5F74A814EF22C32394FD0</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">PLNAME = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">QOS = EO</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline = CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of internal pipeline = SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Queue name : XBTI0009</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Generated prefixed queue name = XBTI0009</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Schedule message in qRFC environment</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Setup qRFC Scheduler OK!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit CALL_PIPELINE_ASYNC</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_RD_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">R E C E I V E R - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_INTERFACE_DETERMINATION">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_ID_PLSRV-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">I N T E R F A C E - D E T E R M I N A T I O N</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Cache Content is up to date</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_RECEIVER_MESSAGE_SPLIT" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_RECEIVER_SPLIT-ENTER_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">number of receivers: 1</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Single-receiver split case</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Post-split internal queue name = XBTO____0000</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Persisting single message for post-split handling</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Going to persist message + call qRFC now...</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">NOTE: The following trace entries are always lacking</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">- Exit WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Async barrier reached. Bye-bye !</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-PERSIST_READ_MESSAGE" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Note: the following trace entry is written delayed (after read from persist)</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="SXMS_ASYNC_EXEC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Starting async processing with pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">system-ID = XI3</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">client = 800</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">language = E</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">user = SMART01</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="Timestamp">2004-12-27T20:08:46Z CET</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">----
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PIPELINE_SYNC" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="T">Get definition of external pipeline CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-LOOKUP_INTERNAL_PL_ID" />
<Trace level="1" type="T">Corresponding internal pipeline SAP_CENTRAL</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">Start with pipeline element PLEL= 5EC3C53B4BB7B62DE10000000A1148F5</Trace>
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_MAPPING_REQUEST">
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_MAPPING_XMS_PLSRV3-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">No mapping required</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_RESOURCE-GETBLOBDATA" />
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="PLSRV_OUTBOUND_BINDING" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV" />
- 
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-CALL_PLSRV_LOCAL" />
- 
- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_PLSRV_OUTBINDING-ENTER_PLSRV">
<Trace level="1" type="T">processing the outbound binding</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">search outbound bindings</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="T">outbound binding exception: No outbound binding found for , R46, , ENT, urn:sap-com:document:sap:idoc:messages, ORDERS.ORDERS04</Trace>
</Trace>
</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />
<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>
<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />
- 
</SAP:Trace>
I have made neccesary Configurations for the Receiver agreement in the Configuration Directory...
Anybody could please help me out...
Regards,
Romit Arun Shankar

Hi Frank,
Many Thanks for your reply.The problem got sorted out and the IDoc(ORDERS04) which i send in SAP 4.6c gets into SAP 4.7 AS ORDERS04 but i have a new problem now....
I didnt use any mappings until now...but now i have to have the segment E1EDK14 filled up for Sales organisation, Distribution Channel, Division details as well as the material number. These segments will not be filled up when a PO is sent from the source system.These segments has to be filled only in the XI system...Is it ? or is there any other solution for it....
Now how we can have this segment E1EDK14 which can occur any number of times with constant values for SORG,DV,DC in the mapping process....
Waiting for ur replies....
Bye,
Romit Shankar Arun.
For this

New thunderbird won't send messages saying some of my addresses I've used for years are not right syntax but they are.

Setting up different computer since lightning strike took out my ethernet (but not much else). Using Mint Linux 13. New setup on this computer with all the latest updates including Thunderbird 31.
Have imported my old addresses that I've been sending to for years but this new t-bird will not allow some emails saying they are not proper sytax when they are. Nothing has changed on the addresses, just Thunderbird has changed. Because of these few it refuses, it won't sent ANY emails now except for replies. Replies using the very same addresses go through with no problem. Lately it finds just one address it refuses but when I take that one out (have to start over now - won't allow me to delete) then it comes up with a whole other list and DOES NOT SEND ANYTHING. This is damned frustrating, to be frank.

What is the exact error message?

Send Message SOAP to Proxy failed - No standard agreement found for

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for