Sender Agreement is not Active

Hello,
I am developing a JMS to File and File to JDBC scenarios on XI service pack 9.
All the necessary objects and configuration are created and activated . When i activated them,evertying got activated but i don,t see sender agreement from the SXI_CACHE even its associated communication channel is not visible from the adapter minitor.
I can see all onjects from SXI_CACHE , only sender agreement is missing.
Any suggestions for this problem?
Best Regards,
Chandra

Chandra,
Click on the Sender Agreemt and then Click on the Sender Business Syste, with which you have associated the Sender Agrement. You should then be able to see the same if it active.
Also, if there is no sender agreement for your adapter, then the adapter in Comm Channel Monitoring would give you the error log , "No sender agreement found" . Are you getting this?
Regards
Bhavesh

Similar Messages

Wrong Sender Agreement:The Sender agreement does not have channel

Hi Guys,
I am trying RFC to File scenarion where I am triggering a report which is calling a RFC module I have given the destinaztion name correct .When I am executing the report it is failing giving the following error
"Wrong Sender Agreement:The Sender agreement does not have channel"
I have checked that sender agreement is there.
Also when Iam changing the RFC call by removing IMPORTING parameters and adding IN BACKGROUND TASK It is getting executed and goin to XI successfullly but after adding IMPORTING Param it is failing ?
Any suggestion on the same?
Regards

Hi Guys ,
I have tested the same again from RFC directly without Report and after some time it failed giving 'SYSTEM ERROR'.
When i checked the channel it is giving following error:
Error: 2008-01-10 13:36:19 IST: Message processed for interface Z_RFC_TESTSYNCASYNC: com.sap.aii.af.mp.module.ModuleException: call to messaging system failed: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Received HTTP response code 500 : Timeout caused by: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DeliveryException: Received HTTP response code 500 : Timeout
Any help now ?
Regards

Why sender agreement need not to create for IDOC

Hi Experts,
why sender agreement need not to create for idoc

Please check these related discussions:
Re: Question on sender agreement
Re: IDOC and HTTP Adapters - sender agreement ??
Re: ** Sender Agreement is required for RFC but not IDoc, XI, & HTTP.. Why ?
Many threads with the same Q are answered on SDN....so if you search you can find the correct answer that you need!
Regards,
Abhishek.

Why sender agreement is not necessary when IDOC is a sender?

Why sender agreement is not necessary when IDOC is a sender?

Hi Chiru,
The IDOC Adapter is implemented in ABAP and reside directly on the Integration Server (ABAP Stack).
You cannot define a sender IDOC channel in directory due to the fact that the IDOC adapter does not run in J2EE Adapter Framework but is an "built in" adapter.
I hope this clarifies.
Regards.
Praveen

HT4245 sometimes but not always the send button is not activated when sending an imessage through face time on my ipad

Sometimes when sending or replying to a message through face time my send button does not work. If I close the app and reopen it the send button has worked but not always. This is very speratic.

Hello cjtulowiecki,
You’re having problems with the computer not booting sometimes.
Do a hard reset.
Power off the computer.
Remove the power cable and the battery.
Hold down the power button for 15 sec while booth power sources are removed.
This should reset the hardware in the computer.
Next test all the hardware in the system.
As you power it back on tap the F2 key. This will load hardware diagnostics.
Run the startup test.
Clicking the White Kudos star on the left is a way to say Thanks!
Let me know how everything goes.
Have a good day.

Phone keeps sending me "Iphone not activated contact your Carrier" after the ios7 update

So I got the Ios7 update yesterday and it downloaded normally and when it was done I had service for like 30 min. after that it kept send me an error saying "iphone not acitvated please contact your carrier" (im with Tmobile) so i called today and they said to wait a couple days or to get on itunes to activate it so i went to itunes and they said "new carrier update" so i installed it. But no luck, i dont get any service or internet connection. my wifi is down so i have to use the neighbors when ever he is home. So i dont know what to do. I tried to take the sim out and clean it with a cloth, i tried to reset my network setting but no luck. I dont want to reset all setting or restore it. So i dont know what to? any help? BTW i have an iphone 4s

Hello joserm,
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
For more information on this, take a look at:
iPhone: Troubleshooting activation issues
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts3424
Best of luck,
Mario

Sender Agreement not needed when in httpclient to file scenario.

Hi,
I will like to understand why in the httpclient to file scenario, a sender agreement is not needed?
Thanks.

HI
Integrattion server - IS expects the messages in XML format. If you see the HTTP request you will see that we pass all the info contained in the Sender areement in the the HTTP request itself , namely - Message interface, message type and the namespace (along with login parameters). For IDOCs the the IDOC- XML are are sent to the IS (through IDOC port configuration at the source system.
When send a message to XI the sender knows that XI system parameters, but when at the reciver end there could be any any system that is reciving the IDOc/HTTTp message. you specify those message through a commumication channel and this channel is associated to a receiver agreement.
For more information you can search in sdn.
Regards
Goli Sridhar

Why we do not need sender agreement for Mail and SOAP adapter

Hi SDN,
I know, we do not need sender agreement for IDOC ,HTTP,XI adapters. As these three adapters will run in Integration engine of the abap stack.
In our scenario if sender is other than IDOC or HTTP or XI .
By Refering Sivamni's blog.
/people/siva.maranani/blog/2005/05/25/understanding-message-flow-in-xi
message will be pickedup by communication channel with the help of sender agreement and prepare XI message header by performing cpa cache lookup. then message will go to module processor etc.
In our scenario if sender is IDOC or HTTP or XI .
As these 3 adapters are run in Integration engine.
Doubt 1:
how the integration engine will create the xi message header like sender interface sender system name etc...
Doubt 2:
I believe SOAP and mail adapter will run in adapter engine.but i came to know that we do not need sender agreement and sender comm channel for these two adapters too...then how the XI message header will create...
Please do correct me if i am wrong
and throw some light on the same..
Appreciate your help....
Regards,
Reehan.

Reehan,
Thanks for pointing me to that link. Guess I was wrong .,But,let me try to put to you why you need a sender agreement for a Sender SOAP Adapter,
1. In the sender SOAP adapter , the Sender Interface and the Interface Namespace as provided in the fields Default Interface Name and InterfaceNamespace. The Name of the Sender Service is provided in the WSDL when you ceate the WSDL in the Integration Directory. So, as all details are available in either the Sender SOAP adapter or in the WSDL url you do not need a Sender Agreement. It is not obligatory but you can always create the Sender Agreement.
2. For the mail adapter , if you select the option XIPAYLOAD, you will have the option to mention the Interface Name and Interface Namespace under XI Parameters and so in this case as once again the details provided in the sender agreement are available in the Sender Adapter itself the sender agreement is not needed for the mail adapter when you have select option XIPAYLOAD.
If you have selected XIALL then you need a sender agreement.
Regards
Bhavesh

The Sender agreement has another channel

Hi all you guys
I have the following problem:
I create a scenario RFC --> XI --> JDBC in wich I configure the sender agreement:
SERVICE : SYSTEM A
INTERFACE: INTERFACE A
COMM CHANNEL: cc_sender_RFC_A
THEN I create another cc by security issues with the user that is used in the first cc for another scenario RFC --> XI -- JDBC and its sender agreement was created like that
SERVICE : SYSTEM A
INTERFACE: INTERFACE B
COMM CHANNEL: cc_sender_RFC_B
but in the RWB its trow the following error:
Wrong Sender Agreement:The Sender agreement does not have channel cc_sender_RFC_B configured for the function module
INTERFACE A
IINTERFACE A and INTERFACE B are function modules.
Any ideas with that?

Hi,
When you are sending messages from same system in both the cases what is the need of creating another communication channel?
Thanks,
Vijay Kumar T.

Sender Agreement

Hi,
I wanted to know what are the cases where sender agreement is not required and why ?
Thanks and best regards,
Kulwant Singh

Hi Kulwant,
I wanted to know what are the cases where sender agreement is not required and why ?......................
As HTTP and IDOC adapter are sitting in the integration engine, there is no need for sender agreement.
There is no need to create an IDoc sender Communication Channel for XI. Instead, the backend SAP system must be configure to send the IDoc to XI.
For HTTP adapter it is not required to have sender agreement. As this adapter is part of Integration Server. SO the message will be automatically put into XI pipeline.
This thread will clearify your doubt:
Re: idoc and http adapters
Hope this was informative to you...
kanan

Sender Agreement SWIFT Configuration

Hi Guys, I need your expertise regarding the SAP SWIFT configuration, i am following a PDF file (ConfGuide_SWIFT_602_v0_4.pdf).
Basically, this is what I have done so far.
1. Create a business service and modifying the receiver tab page according to the pdf file
2. Create the receiver and communication channels in the created business service.
3. During the creation of sender agreement, it states that the interface to be used is SwiftMessage, however, from the list of choices, it is not visible, I think this is due to the fact that in the design, the message interface SwiftMessage is declared as abstract.
The question is, is there a way to get pass this without changing the category of the message interface?
Thanks!

When you create business services, you have to manually add the interfaces in the sender/receiver tabs of the service page. Once you add them here, you will be able to see them in the available interfaces.
However, sender agreements are not needed for the abstract interfaces. You might have to recheck if you have wrongly defined your interfaces.
VJ

SOAP with Sender agreement

Hi all,
Is it possible to send a SOAP message directly to Integration Engine skipping AE.
If yes, then what will be the URL format for IE.
As per my understanding , the URL for Adapter Engine is :
http://host:port/XISOAPAdapter/MessageServlet?channel=party:service:channel
Thanks
Soumya

Here you find the answer:
Using the SOAP inbound channel of the Integration Engine
A sender agreement is not needed.

PCK Sender agreement

Hi mates,
At <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/db/73e03fc2269615e10000000a155106/content.htm">help.sap.com</a> I see that Sender agreements are not required in cases of proxies, SOAP & Mail adapter.
Since there is no Receiver Determination Step in PCK and receiver has to be mentioned in the Sender Agreement, If Sender agreement is not required for proxies, SOAP & MAIL, how are the receiver party & service mentioned?
Do they have to be sent by the client programs of proxy, SOAP & Mail? If yes, the WSDL generated has to contain the details of the receiver psrty and service too. Is that true?
Please clarify.

As for RD in XI i am pasting lines from sap.help
To forward the message, the following objects are required in the Integration Server:
· Party and service of party A, which sends the message. If there is a signature and you want it to be validated, you must also define a communication channel of type Sender and XI. In this case, you must also create a corresponding sender agreement (SA2).
· Party and service of party B, which receives the message. You must define a communication channel of type Receiver and XI.
· A receiver determination (RD) to determine the receiver of the message.
· An interface determination (ID) to define the inbound interface for the outbound interface of the sender.
· A receiver agreement (RA3) to transfer the message from the Integration Server to the PCK of party B.
Hope it helps.

Error While activating Sender agreement having WS Sender Adapter.

Hi all,
I am very new to this technology. I have done Demo example Agency. I configured all the objects. While activating sender agreement having WS adapter as sender adapter, I am gettign the following errors.
1. Field Receiver Communication Party has the value "*"; adapter type WS of communication channel GeneratedSenderChannel_WS does not allow generic key field values
2. Field Receiver Communication Component has the value "*"; adapter type WS of communication channel GeneratedSenderChannel_WS does not allow generic key field values
3. Interface FlightSeatAvailabilityQuery_Out | http://sap.com/xi/XI/Demo/Agency is compatible with SAP NetWeaver 2004 (XI 3.0). Business system GeneratedSenderChannel_WS does not support Web service communication using XI 3.0-compatible interfaces
Can any body solve my problem?? where exactly problem lies??
Regards,
Pavani

hi pavani,
pls see this link.it may help you.
http://****************/Tutorials/XI/XIMainPage.htm
http://209.85.207.104/search?q=cache:fC2GF0rQ6WMJ:www.sap-press.de/download/dateien/1191/sappress_exchange_infrastructure.pdfErrorWhileactivatingSenderagreementhavingWSSenderAdapter%2B+sap&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us
chk each n every step once again. this may happen due to not checking of generic fields.
thanks
klarthik

Test Configuration Tool: Sender Agreement Not Found

Hi, All:
We have new XI3.0 setup and I just want to test simple file to file scenario, but the file was picked up by sender file adapter, however, there is no message sent to Integration server.
When I use Test Configuration Tool, the sender agreement is green, however, it also mention Sender Agreement Not Found, see below:
================================================
Sender Agreement
================================================
futhermore, Interface Mapping is not found either. Actually, Interface has been created on IR. Sender Agreement also created in ID.
Anyone who has idea about these two errors ?
Thanks in advance
Liang

Hi, Raj and Srinivas:
Thanks for your reply.
First of all, all the objects are activated, secondly, when create sender agreement, I just need to input the Sender Service Name / Sender Interface / Sender Interface Namespace. Then finally select commnication channel.
For any Receiver sides, they are grey out, I am not able to input anything.
So, there is no "*" in any fields.
I doubt if there is any setup wrong, especially for adapter engine, maybe some modules that are not functional for file adapter engine, since I also see other problems, I might post them as separate thread.
In Adapter monitor page, I did not see the adapter.
In RWB, if I use IE, there is Error in the page, using Firefox, it is OK.
Thanks And Regards !
Liang

Sender Agreement is not Active

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for