Sending as SNMP trap

Hello expert,
Currently my SolMan system serve as central ccms monitoring, some of the alerts are sending email alert as auto reaction method.
But recently there is request to send the alert to 3rd party non SAP monitoring tool. I am thinking of SNMP traps. but question is each MTE can only have 1 auto reaction method, if i change it to use SNMP traps, so my exisitng email alert is not able to working parallel?
please advise.
thank you
kelly

Dear Kelly,
You may find the following document useful when using CCMS and SNMP Traps.
> https://websmp109.sap-ag.de/~form/sapnet?_FRAME=CONTAINER&_OBJECT=011000358700001606922004E
Regards,
Paul

Similar Messages

Connection between the CCMS sending a SNMP trap to the aplication NETIQ

Hello,
I have to configure a connection between the CCMS sending a SNMP trap to the aplication NETIQ.
Can someone help me? Is there a manual o tutorial to do this?
Best regards.
Pablo Mortera.

Thank you very much Todd.
But NETIQ needs some aditional information to know that is CCMS data from SAP that is receiving?
Is there a way to do a test before sending information?.
Best Regards.
Pablo Mortera.

Send a snmp trap to oracle

Hi,
what would be the syntax to send a SNMP trap to ORACLE from a windows server ?
Many thanks.

Windows version unknown, database version also unknown. But let's try 10gR2:
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B16240_01/doc/em.102/b16244/chap2.htm#CHDHAEDJ
Werner

BPMon: Send BPMon alerts to third party tool through SNMP traps

Hi All,
In our environment the preferred ticketing tool for raising tickets is a CA tool. I have managed to integrate system monitoring on Solution Manager with this third party tool using SNMP traps. Essentially when a system monitoring alert is raised in the alert inbox of solution manager, ticket gets raised in the CA tool.
I want the same integration with BPMon alerts. Whenever a BPMon alert is raised, I want to send an SNMP trap to the CA ticketing tool.
Can someone please guide me to the correct configuration guide or how its done.
Regards,
Ash

Hi Ash
Pleasee see the help guides on raise auto alerts based on CCMS and MTE
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/a9/ef1e109d1af946ae5ab624f972c6fa/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/43/ee6df92cf4eb41b11d15cc8e3a368a/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/66/f9a9b903a611d3b44f006094b910d9/content.htm
As Keiji has said, the functionality that you are looking for is part of teh MAI infrastructure that is available is SP12
Best Regards
Mark

Can SOA suite send SNMP traps?

Hi!
I've looked in a lot documentation to find whether the SOA suite supports sending SNMP traps or not.
It can be done in Oracle Enterprise Manager 10.2.0.3 10g Release 3, but can it be done in EM 10.1.3.1.0 10g Application Manager Control?
(I can't find it there anyway)
/Per

IMHO the SOA Suite itseld is not able to send SNMP traps. You could implement it in for example in BPEL, with sensors. You call a java class that performs the SNMP trap. Or you make a generic BPEL process that sends SNMP traps based on the incoming payload via embedded java, and call this process from ESB or BPEL whenever you want to send a SNMP trap.

Can a WLC have multiple SNMP Trap Receivers with the same cummunity string?

My Monitoring team want me to send traps to three different trap collectors with the same SNMP Community string.
I have 2106's, 2504, 4400's, 5500's, 7510 all running either version 6 or 7.
Is this possible on a Wireless controller? If so, how?

Read this from my friends blog ..
http://mrncciew.com/2013/02/14/configuring-snmp-on-wlc/
"Also you can configure SNMP trap receiver where WLC can send its snmp trap messages. Community Name means SNMP trap receiver name & that does not have any significance like snmp community value."
It doesnt appear to have the same significants .. But I havent tested it
"Satisfaction does not come from knowing the solution, it comes from knowing why." - Rosalind Franklin
‎"I'm in a serious relationship with my Wi-Fi. You could say we have a connection."

Prime Infrastructure 2.1 - Fan-Failure SNMP-Trap Issue

Hello,
I am facing the following Prime Infrastructure (v2.1) issue:
- A Fan-Failure SNMP-Trap from a Cisco 3650 switch doesn't appear on Prime, but a Link-Failure from the same switch does.
- The both events appears on Prime with Syslog.
- The command "snmp-server enable traps envmon fan shutdown supply temperature status" is set up.
- The switch is in "Managed" state in PI, I have checked the ACL at the "snmp-server community" command, it is okay.
- I have set up an SNMP-Trace for the switch on PI, but only "SNMP Null was returned for class com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.Fan3KStats attribute fanIndex" arrived. Please find the log below.
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] [] Adding attributes for object Fan3KStats[151206060_,1012]
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] [] Index name : fanIndex
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] [] Index Value : 1012
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] [] Device MIB table index: .1012
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] [] MIB table row index: .1012
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     OID for : fanIndex = 1.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.1.1012
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     OID for : fanOperStatus = 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.4.1.3.1012
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] [] Get fragment
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] [] Creating PDU: Get
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     VarBind OID=1.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.1.1010
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     VarBind OID=1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.4.1.3.1010
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     VarBind OID=1.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.1.1011
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     VarBind OID=1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.4.1.3.1011
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     VarBind OID=1.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.1.1012
07/02/14 12:39:53.211 TRACE [presence-9] []     VarBind OID=1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.4.1.3.1012
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] Error Status: 0
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] Error index: 0
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] SNMP Null was returned for class com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.Fan3KStats attribute fanIndex
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     Setting attribute: fanOperStatus
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     SnmpInt Value : ?
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] GetMultiAttributes, storing result, class=com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.Fan3KStats, attr=fanOperStatus
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] SNMP Null was returned for class com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.Fan3KStats attribute fanIndex
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     Setting attribute: fanOperStatus
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     SnmpInt Value : ?
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] GetMultiAttributes, storing result, class=com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.Fan3KStats, attr=fanOperStatus
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] SNMP Null was returned for class com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.Fan3KStats attribute fanIndex
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     Setting attribute: fanOperStatus
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     SnmpInt Value : ?
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] GetMultiAttributes, storing result, class=com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.Fan3KStats, attr=fanOperStatus
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] GetMultiAttributes, assembling attributes
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     MIB lookup, OID for: powerSupplyIndex = 1.3.6.1.2.1.47.1.1.1.1.1
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     GetMultiAttributes needs class=com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.PowerSupply3kStats, field=powerSupplyIndex
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     MIB lookup, OID for: powerSupplyOperStatus = 1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.13.1.5.1.3
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] []     GetMultiAttributes needs class=com.cisco.server.managedobjects.bridge.PowerSupply3kStats, field=powerSupplyOperStatus
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] GetMultiAttributes invoked
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] GetMultiAttributes building OIDs for next PDU
07/02/14 12:39:53.218 TRACE [presence-9] [] Adding attributes for object PowerSupply3kStats[151206060_,1009]
- The switch sends the SNMP Trap, based on the followings:
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: %PLATFORM_THERMAL-6-FRU_FAN_OIR: Switch 1: System fan 1 removed
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: %PLATFORM_THERMAL-1-FRU_FAN_NOT_PRESENT: Switch 1: System fan 1 not present
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33202, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576753333
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, NotExist
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 5
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33203, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576753333
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, NotExist
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 5
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33204, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576753333
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, NotExist
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 5
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:30 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33205, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576753333
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, NotExist
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 5
Jul 7 13:38:31 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:31 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:31 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:31 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:45 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:51 UTC: %PLATFORM_THERMAL-6-FRU_FAN_OIR: Switch 1: System fan 1 inserted
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33206, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576755733
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, Normal
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 1
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33207, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576755733
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, Normal
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 1
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33208, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576755733
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, Normal
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 1
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: Queuing packet to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:54 UTC: SNMP: V2 Trap, reqid 33209, errstat 0, erridx 0
sysUpTime.0 = 576755733
snmpTrapOID.0 = ciscoEnvMonMIBNotifications.8
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.2.1010 = Switch 1 - FAN 1, Normal
ciscoEnvMonFanStatusEntry.3.1010 = 1
Jul 7 13:38:55 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:55 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:55 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
Jul 7 13:38:55 UTC: SNMP: Packet sent via UDP to IP_ADDRESS
It seems like PI and the switch doesn't understand each other concerning the fan...
Thanks for any ideas, comments and feedbacks,
Csaba

I have the very same problem.
The switch has a power supply error (one of the two is down). There is the syslog message in PI about it, but no event has created, so nor alarm is there as well.
When I check the status of the switch in the Device Work Center, and choose the Environment in Device Details I can see that PI has not realized the power supply error.
However when I click on the Sync for this very device the power supply status is updated, but still no event or alarm.
This is the case with the FANs as well.

CSCud17778 - memory leak in middle buffers due to snmp traps

The bug details list these as the conditions required to cause the symptom. They don't specify whether these three conditions are an AND or an OR, but I'm assuming that all three must be satisfied:
Conditions:
1) more than one snmp-server hosts are configured
2) "snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart" command is configured
3) some host sending broadcast SNMP traps
What I'm confused about is #3 -- how would that be germane? If some "host" sends SNMP traps to an IP broadcast address, the switch should ignore them because it will not be listening on UDP port 162. If instead of SNMP traps, the host were broadcasting SNMP GETs, that would make it as far as the community string check, which would require buffer storage for the switch SNMP process. And assuming that check failed, the generation of an authentication_failed trap to multiple trap receivers would require more buffers.
Can anyone (especially from the TAC) clarify this?
TIA,
- Marty

Hi Marty,
Yes, all 3 are required (AND conditions).
Also note for #2, it is really the "authentication" portion of the command.
In this case, I believe the IOS devices is actually looking / listening to these received traps. The receipt of this SNMP trap is definately a required condition to trigger this bug.
Sincerely,
David.

Using SNMP traps

Hello,
We are trying to get our Ironports to send out SNMP traps.
At this moment we use a M1050 for testing. we have no test C series and I do not want to pull out a power supply or disk on one of our production systems, just for testing :wink:
At this moment the experiences with the M1050 are not very hopeful.
At first the cold-start trap was send out on the default interface (data1) instead of the management interface which we configured for SNMP, most of the other traps where not send out at all. This was confirmed by support and they promised a better behavior for next versions.
When we upgraded the M1050 to version 6 we expected to gain some traps but the result was disappointing. The cold start trap was now send out over the expected (configured) interface but all the other traps where not send out at all.
Does anyone have other experiences with the C series?
All input is appreciated.
Regards Steven

There is a known issue affecting SNMP traps in AsyncOS versions 5.5 and above. Look for a maintenance release next week and then try your tests again.
cheers,
Chris
Do you have a link to that case, as i have some issues in my own setup. We are using Cacti to monitor our 2 C350. From time to time, we get a timeout on SNMP, but the C350 i proccesesing mail.
/Thorsten

Anyone have succes configuring SNMP traps?

anyone have succes testing SNMP with snmptrap command?
Hello,
I am new to Ironport and the setup configuration of these devices. I am in the process of testing the snmp feature of these servers. As such I have configured the SNMP via snmpconfig command. From customer support I tried to enter the process for alerts and have not been able to get anything. https://ironport.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ironport.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=949&p_li=cF91c2VyaWQ9MXJvblAwcnQmcF9wYXNzd2Q9Zm8wQmE1
Is the link to process. I suspect that the traps are not being sent from the appliance. I have gone over the Doc for the configuration and can't see any errors. I have AsyncOS 6.4 for IronPort M660. This is the Admin server for a C150 and C350. Of which I can get no snmp traps either. The snmp manager is CA if that helps. Is there a log file on Ironport to verify taht traps have been sent? I see my command in the CLI log file.

The main issue is not being able to send a snmp trap to a CA NSM agent. Anyone been down this road before????

Cisco ACS SNMP Traps

Is it possible to send an SNMP trap from Cisco ACE 4710 for any configuration changes that occurs?
Regards,
Hesham

Hi Hesham,
these are the traps which are supported by ACE.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/interfaces_modules/services_modules/ace/vA5_1_0/configuration/administration/guide/snmp.html#wp1177230
read section "ACE SNMP Notifications (Traps)"
I do not see a trap which is useful for your requirement.
regards,
Ajay Kumar

Manipulating SNMP Trap link_down severity level?

Dear Cisco experts,
I wonder if there's a way to manipulate sent traps from a switch with different severity levels?
I now see SNMP link_down traps in my NMS, but they're all of the same level, but a link_down from a desktop is 'normal', a server link_down would be 'warning', but when an uplink to another data center goes down, it should result in all alarms going off, so should be 'critical'.
Is there a way to tell my switch to send an SNMP trap on a different severity level dependent on the type of interface? This is most important because these links all have different SLAs.
Many thanks for your support and suggestions.
Marco van der Pal

This is not possible, Only one sort of trap is possible
You best approach woud be to disable up-down traps on ports that are not important.
LMS now has port groups. That feature could be usefull for doing this
Cheers,
Michel

ISR 3945 - SNMP trap set up to recieve option pings from ASR1006

I am working on a set up : ISR 3945 - Receiving option pings from another device (ASR) and sending a snmp trap (say ex: if a link down on a dial-peer ) to snmp server if those option ping fails.
- Need inputs on SNMP config
Thanks in advance.

Hi.
the easiest way is to get the snmp-server trap source command to work.
when you say it's not working, do you mean the branches still use the external interface as the source? or that it's sourced properly from vlan1 but somehow doesn't get encrypted?
what ios version are you running on the branches? maybe this is a bug and newer versions get it to work?
if you want to through another way than snmp-server trap source, then an ipsec redesign might be needed. As you noticed dmvpn would be the easiest. another solution would be dynamic lan-to-lan from branch to headend with gre tunnels (similar to dmvpn), and then force the route to the management network via GRE, this way the snmp trap source would default to use the tunnel ip address.
Regards,
Fadi.

Sending alerts as SNMP-Traps from Solman to Nagios

Hi!
we would like to set up the alerting structure for sending the alerts as SNMP-Traps from Solman to Nagios.
The questions:
1) Is such integration possible? If yes, how complexe?
2) What are the technical steps to perform in order to realize these steps?
3) What are the steps to perform on Nagios server?
Thank you very much!
regards
H. Thomasson

Hello Prasad,
a search for SNMP in the Online Documentation returns [Sending and Receiving Alerts Using SNMP Traps|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70ehp1/helpdata/en/ff/0620fbf6a404479d48b9e24552f770/frameset.htm].
Regards, Michael

Cisco WLC 5508 not sending SNMP Traps

Hello Everyone.
I'm having a weird error on our WLC environment. We have an HA with two cisco WLC 5508 and i cannot get SNMP Traps working on a Windows PC running Kiwi Syslog server (free ed.).
I can receive correctly Syslog messages, but not traps.
I Tried also to send SNMP Traps from WLC to a different PC using Linux with snmptrapd and it works fine.
I tried then to send from my Linux box a snmp trap to my Windows PC, and it works fine, but i still cannot receive anything from WLC.
Using Wireshark to detect traffic, i cannot see any packet on udp port 162.
I cannot figure out any problem with my scenario, but i can see the following errors on syslog:
*rmgrTrasport: Mar 30 16:08:22.602: #RMGR-3-INVALID_PING_RESPONSE: rmgr_utils.c:270 Ping response from <my_windows_PC> is invalid. Ip address do not match.
My WLC Version is 7.6.130.0
Thank you for your support.

I have gone through your query and found the following fruitful links ,please let me know if it helps and mark it correct answer if it is.
https://www.manageengine.com/network-monitoring/help/userguide/processing_traps.html
https://rscciew.wordpress.com/2014/10/12/snmp-configuration-on-wlc/
Thanks :)

Sending as SNMP trap

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for