Separate GR/IR clearing account for non material

HI,
In the business, already an account is being used as GR/IR clearing account (WRX) for non material receipts (Non material means there is no material code exists in the system but at the time of PO a description is updated manually).
There are in all two plants and at present all the non material values are getting posted to the same GI/IR clearing account. The requirement is to have a separate GR/IR clearing account for both the plants.
Please note that its related to non material only and there is no material code hence no valuation class can be defaulted. Also if valuation class is kept "blank", the system allows only one entry of account.
Please let me know if any exist is available on this.
Best Regards

Hi
It can be done by defining different valuation grouping code for both the plants in OMWD. Then for the respective valuation grouping codes you can maintain different GL accounts in OBYC
Thank You,

Similar Messages

  • Separate GR/IR Clearing Account for Process wise.

    Hi Experts,
    Can any body suggest, how to trigger separate GR/IR clearing account for process wise.
    The requirement is separate GR/IR clearing account for Normal Inventory and STO Inter company.
    Let WRX  trigger for Stock items and Z** for Inter company STO.
    Thanks & Regards
    Sudhansu.
    Edited by: sudhansu satapathy on Nov 16, 2010 2:49 PM

    We can achieve it by using User exit.

  • GR/IR CLEARING ACCOUNT FOR NON STOCK CONSUMPTION ITEMS

    SAP EXPERTS,
    Following the scenario..
    1.PO raised for non stock consumption item for   acct asigned to say a cost center/order
    2.The G/L account on the consumption is OK
    3.When I post GR for the PO Item (non stock consumption ), system is autoposting default the  GR/IR Services G/L account  ie the same G/L account (GR/IR Services ) that is posted when a SES is approved for the Services PO
    3.Pl. note the Item category  I have used is Std.(blank) for the PO raised for non stock consumption item .
    My concern:
    1.Is this system default behaviuor??
    2.i e system will auto post at the time of GR , to the same G/L account (GR/IR Services) for both the consumption item (non stock item procured for cost center/order..via material PO .). and the services PO (for services procured via Services Item category 'D').???
    Pl. help suggest.Matter most urgent!!
    Thanks,
    Ranganath Krishna

    Hi,
    Please check up if there is any default value at the plant level;in case of such default,the system will post to the GL Account defaulted,not with standing the "standard item category".Better checkup if any cost center /order has been assigned.
    The GL item is defaulted thro'the item category.If both the goods and services have been defaulted to the same GL  Account,then not with standing the type [ie] whether goods or services,the system will post tot he same GL Acct.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards.
    Ramesh

  • GR/IR Clearing Account for Material & Asset

    Hi,
    We want to maintain different GR/IR Clearing Account for Materials & Assets.
    Pls. guide.
    Regards,

    Hi
    In case of asset - we define account determination in asset master which is like stock account for material. But if you use purchase order then for asset you use account assignment category as A - it means it is like account assigned purchase order. So all goods reciept credit on these POs will go to GR/IR account created without valuation class. Same time if you donot maintain service masters then goods receipt will go to same account (no valuation class). So either you need to define service materials or use same account for both.
    Thanks

  • PO Release Strategy - Only for non material based

    Experts,
    I have a requirement to implement a release strategy for a single plant for POs for NON material based purchases ( only for using account assignments, cost centers etc).
    The release strategy I configured is working only for the specific plant I want... However, it works whether its a material based PO or a non material based PO.
    How do i get the strategy to work for only the service based purchases, and not the material ones?

    Thanks for the replies but I'm not sure if they are applicable...
    I did create a characterstic for item categories and added the one's I wanted to have... I did NOT include a blank because i thought that would make the difference between the material based PO and non PO. When we I create Po with material (even with no account assignment) it still goes through release.
    Any reason why that is?
    I dont believe the material group solution will not work either because we require material group for material and non material based POs..
    Side note - when i try to use CEKKO with KTTNP, i get a "KTTNP does not exist error." So i used EKPO - KTTNP... hopefully thats ok, but please let me know if its not.
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Jan 30, 2012 3:36 PM
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Jan 30, 2012 3:39 PM
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Jan 30, 2012 3:48 PM

  • Why we use different clearing account for GR/IR and planned cost clearing a

    My client ask for using same account for GR/IR account and all planned cost clearing account.
    i try to convince it should be different accounts but he needs a logical answer.
    Why we use different clearing account for GR/IR and planned cost clearing accounts?

    Dear friend.
    u just tell him while doing GR it will debited n  while doing IR it should get credited.hence we  need to take diff G/L account or same account.
    regds
    nasir

  • HT4946 i am administrator for Mac. My husband and i both have separate iPhones with separate contacts. Since i0S 6.1 update these contacts are now shared which we do not want. I have set up separate iCloud email and account for my husband. How do i ensure

    I am administrator for Mac. My husband and i both have separate iPhones with separate contacts. Since i0S 6.1 update these contacts are now shared which we do not want. I have set up separate iCloud email and account for my husband. How do i ensure that i

    You can continue to use the current AppleID for iTunes, but your husband can create a new AppleID to use to create a new iCloud account that will be his own and not overlap with yours.  If you do not have another email address to use for an AppleID, just get a free Gmail account and use that.
    You can have as many AppleIDs as you want (or at least, as many as you have email addresses for).  You can use a separate AppleID for the store, another for iCloud, and even another for iMessage if you wish.
    You will want to keep the current one as the shared one for the store as all your previous purchases are permanently tied to it, and thus you need that AppleID to update or redownload your current purchased content.

  • Zero Balance Clearing Account for New GL

    Hi SAP Gurus,
    We have one unique situation for zero balance clearing account for New GL.
    We have one global chart of account to which all company codes are assigned. We implemented document splitting with zero balance clearing for 1 splitting characteristics.  We defined clearing account for zero balance for the same as well.
    We need to post to different account only for one company code for zero balancing while other company codes will be posting to same clearing account.  But as per me, we can only define one GL Account per Chart of Account for zero balancing.
    Pls. suggest if you have any solution to this situation.
    Regards,
    Chirag

    Hi,
    Do you have a business rationale for this requirement? Apparently you are using the same Chart of Accounts and hence cannot assign a different GL Account.
    This account will always have zero balance at GL Account level and will not be relevant to your legal reporting. A better solution would be to use the one account that all company codes can agree upon and use.

  • Problem when change bank clearing account for payment posting.

    We recently changed the bank clearing account for payment posting (program PC00_M99_PPM). But I found out because the config can only be changed but not delimited on payroll side, the program errored out when it retro back for an employee to the old clearing account.  So what am I supposed to do to fix this problem?
    Have anyone ever handled this problem before and could please throw some light on it?
    Thanks in advance.
    Johnson

    hi
    check following
    1. Check in OMWD, whether Valuation grouping code "0001" ia ssigned to Ur plant
    2. OBYC - If you have assigned GR/IR Clearing A/c to WRX then check whether you have maintained it with combination of valuation class and GL A/c
    If yes then maintain only GL A/c w/o valuation class OR maintain one entry with valuation class empty and GL A/c
    check following
    Error in service entry sheet
    Re: Error in ML81N
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-acct/grir-clearing-account-wrx-doesnt-recover-gl-account-2224137?cv=expanded
    http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-log-ps/problem-while-posting-service-entrysheet-in-ecc-60-version-1483547?cv=expanded#
    regards
    kunal

  • Clearing accounts for Bank account

    I understand the concept of maintaining clearing accounts for Bank a/cs. But i dont know how to create them. Is there any spl procedure for that or is it similar to GL creation using FS00. Please guide me...
    Thanks in advance
    Choudary KV

    Hi,
    it is just like anyother account. please don't forget to create it as an open item managed account
    Assign points if useful
    Sunoj

  • MR11- for non material item

    I just try to do for one PO with all non material item and
    I can't do MR11 for non material item..
    error:      Error  while determining the currency types for 6302400500 00010

    Hello,
    a non material item can be a text item but it can be also a service item.
    This depends from your customizing. Which item type is relevant for your non material item.
    In the item type you can maintain if an item is relvant for pricing or not.
    Please have a look in transaction VOV7. Here you can set the flag 'Pricing'.
    This flag can have the following specification:
          Blank  No pricing
    X     Pricing standard
    A     Pricing for empties
    B     Pricing for free goods (100% discount)  
    I hope that the information are helpful.
    Best regards
    Claudia
    Edited by: Claudia Neudeck on Jul 17, 2008 8:17 AM

  • Different COGS GL Account for Sample Material delivery

    Dear All,
    Sometime customer is selling their regular finished product as Free Sample, but User want different COGS GL Account whenever he posts PGI for Free Sample material. I checked Split valuation functionality as posted in the forum, but our case finished material managed in the batches and price indicator is S. Appreciate your advice to cater this requirement. 
    Thanks & Regards,
    Santosh

    Hi,
    Option - 1.
    Try testing with GBB - VAX and VAY general modification key.  You need to take care of Cost elements for the GL account assigned.  VAX not a cost element and VAY with cost element. 
    Option - 2.
    You may have a utility which can run as a background job, which transfers the Standard COGS to Sample COGS account for the specific delivery type (only for sample Delivery document type).
    Option - 3.
    This is too lengthy for this requirement.  You might need to create a customer specific movement type. 
    Thanks
    Krish.
    Thanks
    Krish.

  • GR/IR GL Account for Non-stock(consumption items)

    Dear All,
    I understand that for Valuated materials, system will grab the GR/IR GL Accounts from OBYC--> WRX based on the valuation classes.
    However, how about Short text items or Non-valuated materials (Items with no Valuation Class) where you use Account Assignment K( COst Centre) or F (Order).
    Please let me know where system gets this GR/IR Account during MIGO/MIRO...
    The company im working on here has about 20 different GR/IR Accounts based on Valuation Class... im just wondering about consumption items.

    Hi
    In this case, you can update the GRIR account created for non-valuated items in WRX with blank Valuation class in OBYC.
    Regards,
    Lakshmanan Krishnan

  • Diff stock GL account for raw material

    Hi,
    We have raw material under 2 different location, one is under raw material warehouse, another one is under staging area which belongs to production. From time to time, we will issue stock from RM warehouse to staging area.
    The stock GL account (either debit or credit) for the raw material is RM Stock (140001) when we do any movement.
    But we do not want like this. We want that when there is any movement from raw material warehouse location, it will charge to GL account 140001 (RM Stock). And when the movement is from starging area location, it will charge to another GL account (140002 - production stock).
    We want to seperate out the GL account for the raw material if they are under different storage location.
    Can this be done?
    Kindly please advise. Thank you.

    Hi Sim
    Valuation of Stock is done at Plant level and not Storage Location Level. Within a Plant, you can differentiate the G/L accounts based on the Valuation Class assigned in the Accounting view in Material Master.
    The above settings enable automatic account determination at the time of GR. If you want different G/L accounts for different areas, there are 2 options:
    1. Configure and Activate Split Valuation. This will enable you to give different Valuation Classes for different Storage Locations in Matl Master.
    2. The better option is to make the 2 locations as 2 different plants and extend the materials to both these plants.
    However, pls mention your purpose of differentiating the G/L accounts. If it is only to view the stocks in the 2 areas, there are many reports like MB52, etc.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks

  • GL account error Valuation Clearing Account for multiple valuations

    Hi
    I am trying to configure multiple valuations. There is one path:
    IMG --> Controlling --> General Controlling --> Multiple Valuation Approaches/Transfer Prices --> Level of Detail --> Define Valuation Clearing Account
    I created in chart of account 1000 (assigned to company code 1000) GL account 490000 with PL account tick in FS00 and i created cost element as 01. Further i entered trading partner 100001 which is assigned to company code as a 'company' and in the GL account in trading partner. Now when i entered the GL account in above path, it gave following error:
    Account 490000 is not a profit/loss account
    Message no. KM125
    Please let me know why its giving the error.

    Hi,
    I have maintained indicators for PRITEMX then I got error maintain services or limits.
    here I am passing values for SERVICELIMIT table like DOC_ITEM, OVERALL_LIMIT & EXP_VALUE.
    here I have doubt , have to maintain indicators for PRACCOUNTX & SERVICELIMITX ?
    please suggest me.
    Regards,
    BBC

Maybe you are looking for

  • SALE ORDER COSTING ISSUES

    1)    wat is the roles and responsibilities of SD and FICO consultants in case Sales Order Costing how integration is to be done in between Modules 2)    wat r the possibilities in failure in carring the cost run in CK11N and CK24 wat and all we hav

  • How to double dereference in sql scripts

    hi all, I wanted to call a sql file(sql2) from within an another sql file(sql1). The call to sql2 from sql1 contains some parameters( in form of integer and some variables). It is possible to access integer values in sql2 but i am unable to access th

  • Moving photobook from iPhoto 6

    I've created a photobook in iphoto 6 but it apprears to no longer be supported for printing.  Is there a way to move this photobook to my husbands macbook pro which has iphoto '09? Thanks,

  • Safari 4 is official, please fix the double search bar on the right.

    Subject says it all.

  • Why can't I update to Firefox 4 even though I'm running Mac OS 10.5.8?

    The site lists on its system requirements that I have either Mac OS 10.5.x or 10.6.x. I have 10.5.8 but the site says my operating system isn't compatible with Firefox 4. Am I overlooking something obvious here? Any suggestions would be appreciated!