SeqEdit.exe goes to high cpu load after execution

Hello,
I am making a test sequence (in TestStand 2010), which uses a DLL to communicate (through TCP sockets) with a JAVA program.
The execution of tests goes perfectly, with CPU load varying from approximatly 7% to 25%.
However, after a short period of time (couple of seconds) when the tests are finished, the CPU load of SeqEdit.exe rises to 50%, and stays at that level..
(Since I have a dual core PC, this means it confiscates an entire core).
When I start another test, or close TestStand, the high level goes away.
In the Cleanup section of the main sequence, I do (just to be sure) an extra "Unload all modules".
I already tried reinstalling TestStand, that didn't fix the issues.
Anyone any clue?
Jeroen

Hi,
My guess is it's got soemthing to do with your code module. Have you tried one of the supplied examples, I believe there is a JAVA example, and do you see the same problems.
Regards
Ray Farmer

Similar Messages

  • VI causes high CPU load after several days of running

    Hello,
    I have a strange problem. I have craeted a test bench control VI and it runs on five PCs, controling five test benches. All PCs have almost the same hardware, same motherboard, same CPU, etc.
    Normaly the CPU load is around 50% when I run the VI, but at one PC the CPU load climbs up to 85% after several days (maybe one week) of continuous running and the PC is almost tied up - the VI execution becomes very slow (10 times slower) and the mouse only moves very slowly.
    First I thought that the PC has a problem but the problem dissapears as soon as I stop and restart the VI!
    I don't even have to terminate LabVIEW - only my VI and then everything is okay again.
    The problem does not seem to occur at the other four PCs, but I can not tell for sure.
    The task manager says only LabVIEW causes the CPU load - swap file utilisation is little.
    Is there a way to analyze what causes the high CPU load?
    I Use LabVIEW 7.1 professional
    Operating System: Win XP (SP 2 or 3 I don't remember)
    P.S. I have no loops without wait-functions.
    Greetings Johannes
    Using LabVIEW 7.1 and 2009 recently
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    Do all PCs have the same amount of RAM?
    What is the memory use over time as seen by the windows taks manager. Does it increase gradually?
    An increase in resource usage if often cause by sloppy programming.
    Do you grow arrays forever or constantly resize arrays in memory? (built array, insert into array, delete from array)
    Do you often create new references and never close them?
    What does the program actually do? In my opinion, a constant 50% CPU load seems too high for my taste. It means it would not even be able to keep up on slightly older hardware.
    LabVIEW Champion . Do more with less code and in less time .

  • High CPU load after firefox 18.0 update, causing periodical hang

    Hi, I am basically getting crazy here after the update to firefox 18.0 yesterday.
    Firefox periodically causes very high CPU load, which makes it impossible to use.
    http://img805.imageshack.us/img805/702/firefox18.png
    The problem does not occur immediately after restart, but you can already see the spikes of CPU load in the taskmanager with a peak of ~4%. After a couple of minutes this will go up to almost 50% utilizing a whole core and causing the hangs.

    The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
    Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
    To Reset Firefox do the following:
    #Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
    #Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
    #Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
    #Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
    Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
    Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

  • Hwmond high cpu load after 10.6.8 update

    hwmond is causing up to 70% cpu load after every reboot on several xserves i manage caused by the update to 10.6.8. anybody else having this problem? it can be solved by hwmond -s5 to set the hwmond interval to 5 seconds but this command is not processed properly, is causing an error message "IOConnectMethodScalarIScalra0 call return err = 0xE00002BC" and has to be exited with cmd+c. Also, the com.apple.hwmond.plist in LaunchDaemons is empty.

    In my case:
    I installed 10.6.8 via the Combo Update, was running 10.6.7 previous to this.
    /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist still exists and is not empty
    /etc/hwmond.SMART still exists and is not empty
    /etc/hwmond.conf didn't exist, so from Terminal.app I simply issued "sudo touch /etc/hwmond.conf"
    I tried:
    In Terminal.app, ran:sudo launchctl unload /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    Then, backed up /usr/sbin/hwmond and /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    From a Mac Pro running 10.6.7 Server, copied both the binary and the plist to the same spots on the Xserve, then, in Terminal.app, ran:sudo launchctl load /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    That didn't change a thing. hwmond still spiked.
    Put everything back the way it was.
    And:
    In Terminal.app, ran:sudo launchctl unload /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    Backed up /System/Library/LaunchDaemons/com.apple.hwmond.plist
    Made another copy to the Desktop
    Edited this copy and added a string in ProgramArguments with a value of "-S255", but this still caused hwmond to spike after putting this copy back in LaunchDaemons, repairing permissions, and loading the plist via launchctl again. Any valid value still caused it to spike. However my Xserve now reboots if I set the value to an invalid value, like "-s256". Then again this also caused com.apple.hwmond and com.apple.launchd to create entries in the system log complaining about the value with hwmond attempting to relaunch itself every 10 seconds:
    6/24/11 2:37:10 PM com.apple.hwmond[2697] hwmond: n should be 1 to 255 seconds
    6/24/11 2:37:10 PM com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.hwmond[2697]) Exited with exit code: 1
    6/24/11 2:37:10 PM          com.apple.launchd[1] (com.apple.hwmond) Throttling respawn: Will start in 10 seconds
    OP, Armin, did something similar, but I think he tried doing it directly in Terminal, not using launchctl / launchd, which caused the error he mentioned.
    Finally, added a "Disabled" item, with a boolean value of YES to the plist, recopied it, repaired permissions again (launchctl will complain and won't load the plist if you don't). This way hwmond is disabled, I can reboot my Xserve, and wait until Apple figures this out.
    Full com.apple.hwmond.plist on my Xserve looks like this now:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE plist PUBLIC "-//Apple//DTD PLIST 1.0//EN" "http://www.apple.com/DTDs/PropertyList-1.0.dtd">
    <plist version="1.0">
    <dict>
              <key>Label</key>
              <string>com.apple.hwmond</string>
              <key>OnDemand</key>
              <false/>
              <key>Program</key>
              <string>/usr/sbin/hwmond</string>
              <key>ProgramArguments</key>
              <array>
                        <string>hwmond</string>
                        <string>-s255</string>
              </array>
              <key>ServiceIPC</key>
              <false/>
              <key>Disabled</key>
              <true/>
    </dict>
    </plist>
    Edit: I too have filed a bug report with a link to this thread included.
    Second Edit: Server Monitor.app still works after disabling hwmond via the plist even after a reboot.
    Third Edit: Sorry, keep remembering things, a modified /usr/sbin/hwmond was included the 10.6.8 Server Combo Update package, but not the Delta. Not sure if this matters. How has everyone updated to 10.6.8 so far? Like I mentioned, I used the Combo.

  • AcroRd32.exe Goes to High CPU After Reader is Closed

    When I close Acrobat reader, the process AcroRd32.exe jumps up to high CPU usage, about 25% and stays there.  If there are several adobe reader windows open, this occurs upon closing the last reader window.  If I open reader again, then close, I get another stale AcroRd32.exe process and another +25% CPU usage, etc.  I have to kill the processes in Win7 task manager.
    I've tried downgrading from version 11 to version 10, with no success.  I've tried suggestions from this forum and other sites, such as
    edit->preferences->general, uncheck "show me messages...", check "don't show me messages..."
    edit->preferences->internet, uncheck "allow fast web viewing", uncheck "allow speculative downloading..."
    But no luck.  Still happening.
    It hasn't always been this way.  I suspect some interaction with a windows or browser update within the past month or so.
    This is really broken and really annoying.  Thank you!

    I have a customer with the same issue.  I've done all the standard fixes, like disable protected mode, stop messages, etc.  This is on a Citrix XenApp 6.5 server and the particular workstation is shared by many people using a common log on.  The users are all using Reader XI to view AutoCAD 2004 and SolidWorks 2014 drawings that have been printed to PDF.
    Anybody have any ideas because I'm out.

  • High CPU load after resuming from sleep mode

    When my laptop resumes from sleep mode, LabVIEW 2012 starts to generate a very high and always constant CPU load (25%) without any VI running. I need to close all front panels to get back to the usual <1% CPU load level.
    This behaviour spoils my carbon footprint and frequently eats up my battery. Any ideas what is causing this ?
    Thank you,
    Dirk

    I'm guessing your issue may be related to this:
    http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Why-is-using-100-of-a-CPU-1-out-of-8-when-it-does-nothing/m-p/242745...
    Dirk@LV wrote:
    This behaviour spoils my carbon footprint and frequently eats up my battery.
    Thank you,
    Dirk
    Sorry about your carbon footprint, NI has a lot to answer!
    Beginner? Try LabVIEW Basics
    Sharing bits of code? Try Snippets or LAVA Code Capture Tool
    Have you tried Quick Drop?, Visit QD Community.

  • High CPU load after waking with Thunderbolt Display connected

    I have a Mid-2013 MacBook Air 13" with Apple Thunderbolt Display connected. I use this setup mostly in a clamshell mode. Recently I've updated to OS X Mavericks. After that I've noticed that one of the cores is occupied by kernel_task to 100% after waking up from sleep. I've managed to isolate that to Apple Thunderbolt Display connected, without display there is a short CPU spike, but it comes down to normal levels in a couple of seconds.
    I've tried resetting SMC to no success. MacBook doesn't enter Safe Mode either (progress bar goes up to approx. 30% and it goes to reboot). Probably it's because of the Thunderbolt Display, I'm not really sure.
    That's not really a problem as this load doen't seem to impact CPU temp (fans are not spinning faster) and more of a activity monitor display glitch (?).
    Does anyone here encounter this?

    Hey Max,
    I also have one CPU core on my Air'13 to run 100% after a wake-up for about 1 minute (kernel_task).
    It is annoyingly like this after I upgraded to Maverics. Notice, I don't have a Thunderbolt monitor, just a laptop, no periphery.

  • Eclipse causes high cpu load after firefox update

    Hi,
    I have a strange problem after the latest firefox (and xulrunner) update (3.0.5.1 and 1.9.0.5-1). When I open firefox and afterwards eclipse, eclipse uses about 60% of the cpu after a short while; even if I don't do anything at all (and nothing gets compiled) in eclipse. But when I open firefox and eclipse in the reverse order, eclipse behaves normally again (like before the update).
    After a downgrade to xulrunner-1.9.0.4-1 and firefox-3.0.4-1 the execution order of both programms is irrelevant again.
    I assume this has something to do with java or maybe xulrunner?
    Thanks, for any help.
    Last edited by otti (2008-12-25 17:11:34)

    The Reset Firefox feature can fix many issues by restoring Firefox to its factory default state while saving your essential information.
    Note: ''This will cause you to lose any Extensions, Open websites, and some Preferences.''
    To Reset Firefox do the following:
    #Go to Firefox > Help > Troubleshooting Information.
    #Click the "Reset Firefox" button.
    #Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is done, it will show a window with the information that is imported. Click Finish.
    #Firefox will open with all factory defaults applied.
    Further information can be found in the [[Reset Firefox – easily fix most problems]] article.
    Did this fix your problems? Please report back to us!

  • Isa 2006 wspsrv.exe high cpu load

    I have an ISA 2006 Server which run for 5 years without any problem. As the hardware is getting old now I have decided to change the Hardware to a new server but was unable due to the hardware to install Server 2003 which ISA runs only on this one as it
    is 32-bit. I then decided to install server 2008 R2 and install isa 2006 on a vm. Installed all updates patches on server 2008 and the 2003 running on VM, SP1 for ISA.
    Everything went fine, transferred the rules and Exchange and everything works fine.  However, every day, two days three days, very randomly and no systematically timeframe isa 2006 wspsrv.exe get a 99% high cpu load and then the service makes
    the internet to stop.  No internet access anymore, no ping by name or IP.  Rebooting the server fixes that problem until it happens again.  It also happens during different time when people are working or even during the weekend when noone is
    working on the system.
    I have no idea anymore what I could do next.  ISA is the only thing installed on the Server
    Any help would be appreciated

    Hi,
    The blog analyzed a scenario that the high CPU is caused by the third party driver. You could refer to the steps in the blog to troubleshoot this issue.
    Quote:
    What we can conclude here is that we have a condition where wspsrv.exe was allocating more and more threads without releasing resources (releasing threads) because it was getting stuck waiting for an answer from kernel driver.
    Some threads were working on I/O, mainly socket and LRPC call (almost socket) that run in Kernel mode. The third party driver is causing every AFD call to take more time and more CPU cycles, the fact that ISA is extremely using sockets amplify the problem.
    The third party kernel driver was uninstalled from ISA Server and the issue was resolved.
    ISA Firewall Service Process (wspsrv.exe) high CPU utilization issue
    Best Regards,
    Joyce
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • High CPU load and com.apple.ImageCaptureExtension2 crash after upgrade

    After upgrading my Macbook Air from Lion to Mountain Lion, the system has a very high cpu load, and the crash reporter is the process that causes thee high load. In the error log I see this entry several times per second:
    17.08.12 12:58:46,011 ReportCrash[5998]: com.apple.message.domain: com.apple.crashreporter.writereport.crash
    com.apple.message.signature: Image Capture Extension
    com.apple.message.signature2: com.apple.ImageCaptureExtension2 ||| 8.0 (8.0)
    com.apple.message.signature3: 03A96CBDA3C85A114383537BFC5C8999
    com.apple.message.result: NO
    com.apple.message.summarize: YES
    I investigated a bit more and recovered, that it has something to do with the printer drivers. When I remove all printers from setting, everything is fine. As soon as I add a printer (Brother MFC 9440CN printer/scanner, printer driver provided by Mountan Lion), the crash reporter starts it's work and the error log is full of those entries.
    Any suggestions?
    Thanks in advance,
    Marcus

    I did more exploration and found the cause of this, but I don't know how to fix it:
    I removed all Brother and Lexmark printer drivers and rebooted (and also tested with a virtual machine using 10.8.0 as guest os that never had any printer installed). As soon as I enter the printer settings and press the "+", the crashes begin, so it looked like the bonjour one of the printers announcing themselves via Bonjour were causing this.
    When watching a picture in the preview app the same happend. We have two multi function printers in our network, the already mentioned brother printer and a Lexmark X204N. Switching off the Lexmark (which wasn't installed on my Mac) solved the problem. Switching off the printer is no solution in our office (it's our fax device and main printer), but switching off mDNS on the Lexmark also solved it. But this can only be a workaround.
    Is this a known problem with Lexmark devices and Mountain Lion (it works fine with machines using Lion)? Are there any fixes known? It's just the Lexmark device announing itself via Bonjour that causes trouble, even if the driver is not installed.

  • Flashplayer 11.3 high cpu load + stutters

    Hey all, I recently updated my Flash Player Plugin for Firefox to version 11.3.300.268. This results in a high CPU load for the Flash Player process like 30 to 40 percent with a 480p YouTube video and some higher percentages when watching flash video on other websites. The highest percentage must have been like 70% while watching a simple flash video on another website. This high CPU load is not the only problem. The video/audio stutters from time to time and especially when you open a new website, even light ones like Google.com. This problem occurred before but at that time I downgraded my version to flashplayer11_1r102_63_win_32bit.exe which is the latest version of Flash that is working correctly on my system.
    Some specs:
    Windows Vista Home 32-bit
    Intel Celeron M530
    Intel 965 Express Chipset with latest installable drivers via HP website (7.15.10.1839)
    Firefox 14.0.1.
    Possible solutions that had no effect:
    Turning off HW acceleration in Flash settings.
    Turning off HW acceleration in Firefox settings.

    Same issue here. I'm going to downgrade as well, as it's making watching embedded videos very frustrating.

  • Problem... High CPU load with HDD. Please Help

    Hello all,
    Im stuck. Ive got a MSI KA790GX which has poor HDD access/transfer, low burst rate and very high CPU load.
    As far as i know the Western Digital 640gb WD6401AALS Black should be a fast hard drive. Which according to reviews/HD Tune,
    should be:-
    Minimum 60mb/sec
    Maximum 120mb/sec
    Average 95mb/sec
    Access 12ms
    Burst 110mb/sec
    CPU 5%
    No matter what I try, i always get poor results...
    My MSI KA790GX
    Minimum 41mb/sec ~ 54mb/sec
    Maximum 104mb/sec ~ 108mb/sec
    Average 86mb/sec ~89mb/sec
    Access 12ms
    Burst 60mb/sec ~ 80mb/sec
    CPU 26% ~ 44%!!!!!!!!
    I could accept not getting the same high speed results as the review/reference, even if the burst rate sucked.
    But one of the cores goes to 50%-60% load during hdd activity. Thats just crazy!!
    I have tried...
    IDE mode, AHCI, RAID Ready, RAID Single Disk
    SATA Port 1, 2, 3, 4 + 5
    Different SATA cables
    Flashed bios, cleared bios, optimised defaults, failsafe defaults
    Windows XP 32bit, Vista 32bit, Vista 64bit. fresh installs
    MSI CD Drivers, MSI Web Drivers, AMD/ATI Web Drivers
        ... and combinations of.
    I have also tested the WD640gb Black on another older PC, with Nvidia (55?) chipset and slower (1.9ghz x2) cpu.
    Transfer rates were slightly better than my KA790GX but, Burst Rate = 115mb/sec and CPU usage = 13%.
    I also tried a Seagate 1.5tb (ST31500341AS) on both PCs,
    Nvidia chipset
    Minimum 65mb/sec
    Maximum 134mb/sec
    Average 107mb/sec
    Access 14ms
    Burst 83mb/sec
    CPU 7%
    On my MSI KA790GX
    Minimum 55mb/sec
    Maximum 120mb/sec
    Average 100mb/sec
    Access 14ms
    Burst 87mb/sec
    CPU 33%!!!!
    Could someone please please help, ive spent hours and hours on this. Its doin my head in.
    I just hope its something stupid ive missed, cos i still not used my HD4850 from christmas :-(
    Thanks.

    Sm3K3R
    Not sure how to check PIO/DMA mode on a SATA device. IDE devices show DMA enabled.
    BIOS version 1.4 - 29 December 2008, and now version 1.51
    Fredrik
    I have Vista 64, but i did try XP32 and Vista32 and got similar poor results.
    I tested HDD speed with, HD Tune 2.55 and HD Tune 3.50 trial.
    No auto-start programs really, Windows clean installs + any drivers.
    Quadrifoglio Verde
    CPU @ default 2800mhz, All mem bios options to auto/defaults
    Windows Experience Index, CPU Score = 5.3
    AMD Overdrive
     Integer Computation = 8220
     Floating Point Computation = 5325
     Memory speed = 1770
     Cache Speed = 10790
     System Performance = 7403
    Bas
    I used HDTune because I could reference to other results. Whats a better program to use?
    Windows Experience Index, HDD Score = 5.9.
    But I have no reference and cant be sure of cpu load.
    Sepher
    Bios defaults to C&C and C1E off so i have tried them. Also windows power settings, balanced/high performance.
    UPDATE
    Reinstalled Vista64 but loaded the AHCI driver from the disk config screen. This seems to have stopped the high cpu usage during disk activity.
    HDTune with Windows Power settings @ High Performance,
    Min = 52mb/sec
    Max = 106mb/sec
    Ave = 88mb/sec
    Access = 12ms
    Burst = 77mb/sec
    CPU = 3.4% 
    HDTune with Windows Power settings @ Balanced
    Min = 54mb/sec
    Max = 104mb/sec
    Ave = 87mb/sec
    Access = 12ms
    Burst = 65mb/sec
    CPU = 12%
    So now transfer speed is about 10% slower than reference. But burst speed is terrible.
    I also used IBM Feature Tool to change the HDD AAM to 'performance mode' 254 as suggested elsewhere.
    Long shot as the hdd performs ok with other hardware. same results.
    Also MSI support asked me to try a newer bios, version 1.51. same results.
    Anyone know what the AMD 7-Series Chipsets Disk Performance Utility does, and should i run it in Vista64?
    Thanks for all the replies, hope i can sort this, not played any PC games since Quake 3 on my ti4600...

  • Explorer.exe - Using up high CPU

    Hello community!
    I'm writing this on my desktop as the laptop which has the problem is unusable.
    Windows Explorer (explorer.exe) is using high cpu (30-60%), and crashes after about 30 seconds.
    This started happening a couple of days ago, and I cannot remember any action from my part that might have triggered this problem; one day it was perfect, the other day it had the problem.
    Here is an HiJackThis report:
    Hello community!
    I'm writing this on my desktop as the laptop which has the problem is unusable.
    Windows Explorer (explorer.exe) is using high cpu (30-60%), and crashes after about 30 seconds.
    This started happening a couple of days ago, and I cannot remember any action from my part that might have triggered this problem; one day it was perfect, the other day it had the problem.
    Here is an HiJackThis report:
    [quote]
    Logfile of Trend Micro HijackThis v2.0.5
    Scan saved at 12:40:59 PM, on 2013-11-29
    Platform: Unknown Windows (WinNT 6.02.1008)
    MSIE: Internet Explorer v10.0 (10.00.9200.16537)
    Boot mode: Normal
    Running processes:
    C:\Users\emili_000\AppData\Roaming\Dropbox\bin\Dropbox.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Intel(R) ME FW Recovery Agent\bin\ismagent.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Intel(R) ME FW Recovery Agent\bin\updateui.exe
    C:\Program Files (x86)\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe
    C:\ÉMILIE\Download\HijackThis.exe
    R1 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Default_Page_URL = http://samsung13.msn.com
    R1 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Search Page = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=54896
    R0 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Start Page = http://search.conduit.com/?SearchSource=10&CUI=UN32722210862607114&UM=2&ctid=CT3289847&UP=SPAAE27309-59AC-46A1-85ED-D84EE5E06B0D&SSPV=
    R1 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Default_Page_URL = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/p/?LinkId=255141
    R1 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Default_Search_URL = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=54896
    R1 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Search Page = http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=54896
    R0 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Start Page = http://start.mysearchdial.com/?f=1&a=irmsd62&cd=2XzuyEtN2Y1L1Qzu0C0A0FyBtAtAyCzy0DtCtDtB0EtByCyDtN0D0Tzu0SyDyEtDtN1L2XzutBtFtBtFyEtFyBtAtCtN1L1Czu1L1C1H1B1QyCtB&cr=686344045&ir=
    R0 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Search,SearchAssistant = 
    R0 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Search,CustomizeSearch = 
    R0 - HKLM\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Main,Local Page = C:\Windows\SysWOW64\blank.htm
    R0 - HKCU\Software\Microsoft\Internet Explorer\Toolbar,LinksFolderName = 
    R3 - URLSearchHook: WhiteSmoke New Toolbar - {739df940-c5ee-4bab-9d7e-270894ae687a} - C:\Program Files (x86)\WhiteSmoke_New\prxtbWhit.dll
    F2 - REG:system.ini: UserInit=userinit.exe
    O2 - BHO: MSS+ Identifier - {0E8A89AD-95D7-40EB-8D9D-083EF7066A01} - C:\Program Files\McAfee Security Scan\3.8.130\McAfeeMSS_IE.dll
    O2 - BHO: WebCake Layers - {2A5A2A90-3B30-4E6E-A955-2F232C6EF517} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Tepfel\WebCakeIEClient.dll
    O2 - BHO: WhiteSmoke New - {739df940-c5ee-4bab-9d7e-270894ae687a} - C:\Program Files (x86)\WhiteSmoke_New\prxtbWhit.dll
    O2 - BHO: Java(tm) Plug-In SSV Helper - {761497BB-D6F0-462C-B6EB-D4DAF1D92D43} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\bin\ssv.dll
    O2 - BHO: TidyNetwork.com - {7736C7FA-512D-11E2-B871-DEC36088709B} - C:\Users\emili_000\AppData\Local\TidyNetwork.com\tidy2ie.dll
    O2 - BHO: McAfee SiteAdvisor BHO - {B164E929-A1B6-4A06-B104-2CD0E90A88FF} - c:\program files (x86)\mcafee\siteadvisor\mcieplg.dll
    O2 - BHO: URLRedirectionBHO - {B4F3A835-0E21-4959-BA22-42B3008E02FF} - C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\root\Office15\URLREDIR.DLL
    O2 - BHO: Java(tm) Plug-In 2 SSV Helper - {DBC80044-A445-435b-BC74-9C25C1C588A9} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Java\jre7\bin\jp2ssv.dll
    O3 - Toolbar: McAfee SiteAdvisor Toolbar - {0EBBBE48-BAD4-4B4C-8E5A-516ABECAE064} - c:\program files (x86)\mcafee\siteadvisor\mcieplg.dll
    O3 - Toolbar: WhiteSmoke New Toolbar - {739df940-c5ee-4bab-9d7e-270894ae687a} - C:\Program Files (x86)\WhiteSmoke_New\prxtbWhit.dll
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [CLMLServer_For_P2G8] "C:\Program Files (x86)\CyberLink\Power2Go8\CLMLSvc_P2G8.exe"
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [CLVirtualDrive] "C:\Program Files (x86)\CyberLink\Power2Go8\VirtualDrive.exe" /R
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [RemoteControl10] "C:\Program Files (x86)\CyberLink\PowerDVD10\PDVD10Serv.exe"
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Adobe Reader Speed Launcher] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Reader 10.0\Reader\Reader_sl.exe"
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Intel AppUp(SM) center] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\IntelAppStore\bin\ismagent.exe" --domain-id F0399437-FD0C-4A48-B101-F0314A6172E4
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Agent for Windows] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Cisco\Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client\vpnui.exe" -minimized
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [SunJavaUpdateSched] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Java\Java Update\jusched.exe"
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [mcpltui_exe] "C:\Program Files\McAfee.com\Agent\mcagent.exe" /runkey
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [Adobe ARM] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Common Files\Adobe\ARM\1.0\AdobeARM.exe"
    O4 - HKLM\..\Run: [SDTray] "C:\Program Files (x86)\Spybot - Search & Destroy 2\SDTray.exe"
    O4 - HKCU\..\Run: [RESTART_STICKY_NOTES] C:\Windows\System32\StikyNot.exe
    O4 - HKCU\..\Run: [WebCake Desktop] C:\Users\emili_000\AppData\Roaming\Movdap\WebCakeDesktop.exe
    O4 - HKCU\..\Run: [Facebook Update] "C:\Users\emili_000\AppData\Local\Facebook\Update\FacebookUpdate.exe" /c /nocrashserver
    O4 - HKUS\S-1-5-18\..\Run: [Gestionnaire Antidote.exe] C:\Program Files (x86)\Druide\Antidote\Gestionnaire Antidote.exe (User 'SYSTEM')
    O4 - HKUS\.DEFAULT\..\Run: [Gestionnaire Antidote.exe] C:\Program Files (x86)\Druide\Antidote\Gestionnaire Antidote.exe (User 'Default user')
    O4 - Startup: Dropbox.lnk = emili_000\AppData\Roaming\Dropbox\bin\Dropbox.exe
    O4 - Global Startup: McAfee Security Scan Plus.lnk = C:\Program Files\McAfee Security Scan\3.8.130\SSScheduler.exe
    O8 - Extra context menu item: E&xport to Microsoft Excel - res://C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\Root\Office15\EXCEL.EXE/3000
    O8 - Extra context menu item: Se&nd to OneNote - res://C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\Root\Office15\ONBttnIE.dll/105
    O8 - Extra context menu item: Send to Bluetooth - C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Bluetooth\btSendToObject.htm
    O9 - Extra button: Send to OneNote - {2670000A-7350-4f3c-8081-5663EE0C6C49} - C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\root\Office15\ONBttnIE.dll
    O9 - Extra 'Tools' menuitem: Se&nd to OneNote - {2670000A-7350-4f3c-8081-5663EE0C6C49} - C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\root\Office15\ONBttnIE.dll
    O9 - Extra button: OneNote Lin&ked Notes - {789FE86F-6FC4-46A1-9849-EDE0DB0C95CA} - C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\root\Office15\ONBttnIELinkedNotes.dll
    O9 - Extra 'Tools' menuitem: OneNote Lin&ked Notes - {789FE86F-6FC4-46A1-9849-EDE0DB0C95CA} - C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\root\Office15\ONBttnIELinkedNotes.dll
    O9 - Extra button: Send to Bluetooth - {2F56DCAA-153B-4479-B4E2-547405B34FB9} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Bluetooth\btSendToPage.htm (HKCU)
    O9 - Extra 'Tools' menuitem: Send to Bluetooth - {2F56DCAA-153B-4479-B4E2-547405B34FB9} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Intel\Bluetooth\btSendToPage.htm (HKCU)
    O9 - Extra button: Correcteur - {F7C8E5F6-B6D1-45db-8D91-2BCFA5DF11A9} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Druide\Antidote 8\Texteurs\Internet Explorer\Antidote.InternetExplorer.K.P109.htm (HKCU)
    O9 - Extra button: Dictionnaires - {F9B969E8-58D0-4dd9-AC8A-EE2336FF8F65} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Druide\Antidote 8\Texteurs\Internet Explorer\Antidote.InternetExplorer.D.P109.htm (HKCU)
    O9 - Extra button: Guides - {FA089E36-3F1B-4c51-9A1A-C4E7012483AF} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Druide\Antidote 8\Texteurs\Internet Explorer\Antidote.InternetExplorer.G.P109.htm (HKCU)
    O11 - Options group: [ACCELERATED_GRAPHICS] Accelerated graphics
    O15 - Trusted Zone: *.clonewarsadventures.com
    O15 - Trusted Zone: *.freerealms.com
    O15 - Trusted Zone: *.soe.com
    O15 - Trusted Zone: *.sony.com
    O18 - Protocol: dssrequest - {5513F07E-936B-4E52-9B00-067394E91CC5} - c:\program files (x86)\mcafee\siteadvisor\mcieplg.dll
    O18 - Protocol: osf - {D924BDC6-C83A-4BD5-90D0-095128A113D1} - C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office 15\root\Office15\MSOSB.DLL
    O18 - Protocol: sacore - {5513F07E-936B-4E52-9B00-067394E91CC5} - c:\program files (x86)\mcafee\siteadvisor\mcieplg.dll
    O18 - Protocol: wlpg - {E43EF6CD-A37A-4A9B-9E6F-83F89B8E6324} - C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Live\Photo Gallery\AlbumDownloadProtocolHandler.dll
    O18 - Filter: application/x-mfe-ipt - {3EF5086B-5478-4598-A054-786C45D75692} - c:\program files (x86)\mcafee\msc\mcsniepl.dll
    O20 - AppInit_DLLs: C:\Program Files (x86)\SearchProtect\SearchProtect\bin\SPVC32Loader.dll C:\Program Files
    O20 - Winlogon Notify: SDWinLogon - SDWinLogon.dll (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\Alg.exe,-112 (ALG) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\System32\alg.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\efssvc.dll,-100 (EFS) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\System32\lsass.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\fxsresm.dll,-118 (Fax) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\fxssvc.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @keyiso.dll,-100 (KeyIso) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: McAfee Personal Firewall (McMPFSvc) - McAfee, Inc. - C:\Program Files\Common Files\McAfee\Platform\McSvcHost\McSvHost.exe
    O23 - Service: McAfee Anti-Malware Core (mfecore) - McAfee, Inc. - C:\Program Files\Common Files\McAfee\AMCore\mcshield.exe
    O23 - Service: McAfee Firewall Core Service (mfefire) - McAfee, Inc. - C:\Program Files\Common Files\McAfee\SystemCore\\mfefire.exe
    O23 - Service: McAfee Validation Trust Protection Service (mfevtp) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\mfevtps.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @comres.dll,-2797 (MSDTC) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\System32\msdtc.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\System32\netlogon.dll,-102 (Netlogon) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\Locator.exe,-2 (RpcLocator) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\locator.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\samsrv.dll,-1 (SamSs) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\snmptrap.exe,-3 (SNMPTRAP) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\System32\snmptrap.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\spoolsv.exe,-1 (Spooler) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\System32\spoolsv.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\sppsvc.exe,-101 (sppsvc) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\sppsvc.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: Stardock Start8 (Start8) - Stardock Software, Inc - C:\Program Files (x86)\Stardock\Start8\Start8Srv.exe
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\ui0detect.exe,-101 (UI0Detect) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\UI0Detect.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\vaultsvc.dll,-1003 (VaultSvc) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\lsass.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%SystemRoot%\system32\vds.exe,-100 (vds) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\System32\vds.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\vssvc.exe,-102 (VSS) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\vssvc.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%systemroot%\system32\wbengine.exe,-104 (wbengine) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\wbengine.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%ProgramFiles%\Windows Defender\MpAsDesc.dll,-310 (WinDefend) - Unknown owner - C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Defender\MsMpEng.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%Systemroot%\system32\wbem\wmiapsrv.exe,-110 (wmiApSrv) - Unknown owner - C:\windows\system32\wbem\WmiApSrv.exe (file missing)
    O23 - Service: @%PROGRAMFILES%\Windows Media Player\wmpnetwk.exe,-101 (WMPNetworkSvc) - Unknown owner - C:\Program Files (x86)\Windows Media Player\wmpnetwk.exe (file missing)
    End of file - 11774 bytes
    I hope this helps.
    Jelly

    Hi,
    Since this started happening a couple of days ago, have you installed some 3rd party software recently? That may cause this issue.
    Please try clean boot to check the issue. If the issue disappears in the Clean Boot environment, you can continue to narrow down which entry is causing the issue.
    How to perform a clean boot in Windows 8.1, Windows 8, Windows 7, or Windows Vista
    http://support.microsoft.com/kb/929135/en-us
    I also suggest you use Process Explorer to capture the abnormal process.
    Please refer to this blog:
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/markrussinovich/archive/2008/04/07/3031251.aspx
    If issue persists, please upload the event log here for further analyzing.
    Yolanda
    TechNet Community Support

  • Which will cause a higher cpu load, the sampler instrument or the original audio tracks?

    I have some piano that I wanted to loop. I had no problem using the convert track to sampler instrument.  My question is about CPU performance. Which will cause a higher cpu load, the sampler instrument or the original audio tracks?

    Hi Mesaboogiewes,
    Welcome to Apple Discussions
    Ableton.com recommends disabling Energy Saver, fullscreen mode, and Exposé. I would recommend putting the 1Gb of RAM, you will find a better result. I suggest going to the Ableton.com website and looking for more troubleshooting issues.
    I hope that helps,
    Jon

  • Xorg causes extrem high cpu load

    Hello,
    from time to time xorg causes a extrem high cpu load on my system.
    http://imageshack.us/f/38/xorgload.png
    After a reboot it should looks like that
    http://imageshack.us/f/16/xorgnormal.png/
    Is there any possibility the figure out why this happens sometimes?
    Thanks for your help!

    cerbie wrote:And, do I know you from somewhere--a little more Windows-centric--or are there many ElkMonsters, out here?
    Hehe, I'm also wondering how many Cerbies are out there...
    Really funny. The internet is a small place, obviously. Us meeting in a Linux forum also explains why nobody writes to the LSML anymore.

Maybe you are looking for