Serices Material is not getting picked Up in Proforma Invoice

Hi..
While craeting proforma invoice for serices,service material is not getting picked up..
where can be the settings?
Thanks
Manoj

Check if the item category is maintained in copy control from Say Sales Order to Proforma Invoice. T.Code: VTFA. If Item Category not maintained, then maintain it appropriately.
Regards,
Rajesh Banka

Similar Messages

  • GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up

    If we have creating a PO without checking "GR based IV" then in MIRO the Cenvat clearing A/c is not getting picked up, due to this we are not able to create MIRO document with Excise duty value.
    We are using Tax calculation procedure TAXINN.
    Regards,
    Rama Mohan

    Hi,
    Check in the following path :
    Material Management > Purchase Order > Define screen layout at document level
    Choose ME21N for details and check by double clicking  the GR/IR control whether GR based invoice verification
    is an optional entry.
    Regards,
    Sadashivan

  • CST is not getting picked up in sales order

    Dear Experts,
    We are following TAXINN procedure and we have maintained condition record for excise condition type - JEXP, JECS & JA1X and tax condition types - JIVC and JIVP. But in sales order, Excise condition types and Vat is getting picked automatically for local customer. But if I chose a CST customer CST is not getting picked automatically even though I have maintained condition record for the same. I have told my client to use alternative tax classification but my client doesnt want to follow this procedure.
    Kindly let me know, how can I make the CST to  be picked automatically in sales order.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Reji S

    Dear Reji,
    These may be the possible areas for the issue.
    1.Check the ship to party Tax classification in the customer master>Sales area data>billing tab.
    2.Check the Tax classification of the material master-->Sales org data view.
    3.Check the region of the ship to party.
    I hope this will help you,
    Regards,
    Murali.

  • Sales Order not getting Pick Release and getting BACKORDERED

    Hi Gurus,
    There is an order in oracle production. When user try to Pick Release this order the order is not getting picked instead it is getting backordered. The line quantities are available and it is also not in hold. I also see the log files of ‘Pick Slip Generation report’, but it shows no error message. Do you have any idea on this?
    Thanks,
    SamD

    Are the quantities in a reservable subinventory?
    If you go to material workbench, does the quantity show as available to reserve?
    Did you specify a subinventory in the release process?
    Does the sales order line have a subinventory on it?
    Check if your onhand is in staging subinventory?
    Check older threads on this issue such as http://kr.forums.oracle.com/forums/thread.jspa?threadID=603998
    Sandeep Gandhi

  • New Condition table / access not getting picked in purchase order.

    I have created a new condition table for the tax to be calculated for Site / Material combination. The access sequence is also crated.
    When I created the purchase order the condition / tax is not getting picked. When I checked in the analysis, I found that the error was Access not made (initalize field) for the site.  The material is being picked up.
    Please note that the site is getting picked from KOMK table ( I think it is a header table), while the site is actually there in the line item level in the po.
    Request your help at the earliest.
    Regards,
    Veena.

    TCODE OBQ2
    Select the tax access sequence. Click on accesses. Tick the right combination required site / article . then click on the fields tab. This will take you to the next screen. There click on the field for which you want to change the selection table and then click on field catalog at the bottom of the screen.
    This will take you to the field catalog screen. there select the table and field and then save.
    With this procedure you can select the required field into KOMK OR KOMP.
    Regards,
    Veena.

  • Material type not getting displayed in the cube........

    Hi,
    In my infocube material type for one of the material is not getting displayed.
    When I check in the content of the cube for this material all the fileds are getting displayed except material type.
    However it is present in the material master data from which it is put into the update rules to populate in the cube.
    Its getting displayed for some other materials , so we cant say that mapping is wrong or problem with update rules.
    Can some body let me know what could be the reason.
    Thanks,
    Jeetu

    Hi Jeetu,
    can you check in your cube if you have for one material, entries with AND entries without the MATL_TYPE? If this is the case then you were loading transactional data before having the corresponding material master data.
    You should adapt your scenario:
    - first do not use the standard attribute derivation during your URules: performance is very bad.
    - implement a start routine filling an internal table with your material and MATL_TYPE for all entries of material in your datapackage.
    - implement an update routine on the MATL_TYPE with a READ on this internal table an raise an ABORT = 4 if the MATL_TYPE is initial or the material in not found.
    Now to fix your situation you'll have to reload your cube or alternatively just reload your missing MATL_TYPE MATERIAL from your cube itself and selective delete those which are empty.
    hope this helps...
    Olivier.

  • Material cost not getting displayed in CN41N

    Hi Gurus,
    When we execute CN41N, Materials assigned to the Network activity are visible but the cost of each material is not getting displayed against it (under Proj. Cost Plan Column) and it is appearing as '0' whereas, it is appearing as an accumulated cost against the activity. I checked SAP notes for this problem, though I could see some notes which are very close to the problem but all are for Release 600 whereas we are using 604 (ECC 6.0). Have anyone encountered such problems or whether the cost will not appear against Material in CN41N.
    Awaiting your valuable suggestions.
    thanks in advance.
    Vinodh

    I have seen planned cost of material against material itself in structure report like CN41, CN41N under following conditions:-
    1. Valuated Project Stock
    2. Material is created using Reservation for WBS or PR+Res for WBS Procurement indicators.
    3. Costing relevancy box ticked for material
    4. Statistical Cost element exists for Inventory account.
    I have not seen planned cost for non-stock item or material with res for network in project. This is purely based on my experience and I dont have any notes or help document to validate my statement.

  • Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

    Dear Experts,
    I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
    I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
    Kindly resolve the issue.
    Satish

    S0004830404 wrote:
    Dear Experts,
    >
    > I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
    > I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
    >
    > Kindly resolve the issue.
    >
    > Satish
    hi,
    use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
    Thanking you

  • Index is not getting picked even after providing hint

    Hi All
    The index pk_sku is not getting picked even after providing the hints when executing the query.Please kindly give me such recommendations.I am providing the information.
    select  * from
    (select /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
          to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
          t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
          t.site_id as SITE_ID,
          tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
          t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
          t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
          t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
          to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
          t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
          t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
          t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
          t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
          s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
    from  mv_inventory_transaction t
          JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id ,
           mv_sku s
    where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
    and     t.client_id=s.client_id
    and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
    and    ( :site is null or t.site_id  in (:site))
    and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
    and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
    and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between  to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
    and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
    UNION ALL
    (select  /*+ index(s pk_sku) */
         to_char(t.dstamp, 'YYYYmmDDHH24MI') as sort_1,
        t.client_id as CLIENT_ID ,
          t.site_id as SITE_ID,
                          tz.time_zone_name as TIME_ZONE_NAME     ,
          t.owner_id as OWNER_ID,
          t.sku_id as SKU_ID,
          t.reason_id as ADJUST_TYPE,
          to_char(t.dstamp+tz.diff/24, 'DD/mm/YYYY HH24:MI') as ADJUST_DATETIME,
          t.reference_id as RECEIPT_ID,
          t.batch_id as BATCH_ID,
          t.update_qty as UPDATE_QTY,
          t.lock_code as LOCK_CODE,
          s.description as SKU_DESCRIPTION
    from  mv_inventory_transaction_arch t
          JOIN timezone tz ON tz.site_id = t.site_id,
           mv_sku s
    where   t.sku_id= s.sku_id
    and     t.client_id=s.client_id
    and   ( :client is null or :client = t.client_id)
    and    ( :site is null or t.site_id  in (:site))
    and    ( :owner is null or t.owner_id in (:owner))
    and    t.code= 'Adjustment'
    and   (t.dstamp+tz.diff/24) between  to_date(:dateFrom, 'DD/mm/yyyy') and to_date(:dateTo,'DD/mm/yyyy')+1
    and      (:sku is null or t.sku_id in (:sku))
    order by sort_1,2,3,4,5
    version = Release 10.1.0.5.0
    SQL> sho parameter optimizer
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
    sho parameter db_file_multiblock_count_read
    sho parameter cursor_sharing
    SQL> sho parameter optimizer
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    optimizer_dynamic_sampling           integer     2
    optimizer_features_enable            string      10.1.0.5
    optimizer_index_caching              integer     0
    optimizer_index_cost_adj             integer     100
    optimizer_mode                       string      ALL_ROWS
    SQL>  sho parameter db_file_multi
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    db_file_multiblock_read_count        integer     16
    SQL> sho parameter cursor_sharing
    NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
    cursor_sharing                       string      EXACTExplain plan
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K  (1)| 01:09:07 |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K  (1)| 01:09:07 |
    |   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   345K  (1)| 01:09:07 |
    |   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   984 | 29686   (1)| 00:05:57 |
    |   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26870   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 |  7600 | 26866   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24327   (1)| 00:04:52 |
    |  11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
    |  12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 |  2328 |  2539   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  |  9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  6142 |  2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
    |  16 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M|  2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  18 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 |  1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |  19 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 26568 |   315K  (1)| 01:03:10 |
    |  20 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K  (1)| 01:02:37 |
    |  21 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  22 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K  (1)| 01:02:37 |
    |  23 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  24 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  25 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19258   (1)| 00:03:52 |
    |  26 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |  27 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  28 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K  (1)| 00:58:45 |
    |  29 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       |  3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
    |  30 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  6142 |  2816   (1)| 00:00:34 |
    |  31 |       UNION-ALL                        |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  32 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        |   335K|    10M|  2535   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  33 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS FULL            | MV_SKU                        | 37839 |  1699K|   280   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------when put in sql tuning advisor,It recommended with better plan using indexes
    | Id  | Operation                              | Name                          | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K  (1)| 01:08:01 |
    |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY                         |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K  (1)| 01:08:01 |
    |   2 |   VIEW                                 |                               |    56 | 29736 |   340K  (1)| 01:08:01 |
    |   3 |    UNION-ALL                           |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   4 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |     2 |   848 | 26900   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   5 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 | 26898   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   6 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |   7 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    25 |  7600 | 26894   (1)| 00:05:23 |
    |   8 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |   9 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  10 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |     1 |    67 | 24352   (1)| 00:04:53 |
    |  11 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_CLIENTID_690         | 79681 |       |   518   (1)| 00:00:07 |
    |  12 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  13 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION      |    24 |  2328 |  2542   (1)| 00:00:31 |
    |  14 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | IDX_CODE_646                  |  9269 |       |    46   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  15 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  16 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  17 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  18 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  19 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  20 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  21 |     NESTED LOOPS                       |                               |    54 | 22896 |   313K  (1)| 01:02:38 |
    |  22 |      HASH JOIN                         |                               |     1 |   326 |   313K  (1)| 01:02:38 |
    |  23 |       TABLE ACCESS FULL                | TIMEZONE                      |     4 |    88 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  24 |       VIEW                             | MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   576 |   171K|   313K  (1)| 01:02:38 |
    |  25 |        UNION-ALL                       |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  26 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  27 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |     1 |    72 | 19269   (1)| 00:03:52 |
    |  28 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         | 36016 |       |   287   (1)| 00:00:04 |
    |  29 |         FILTER                         |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  30 |          MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| MV_INVENTORY_TRANSACTION_ARCH |   575 | 55200 |   293K  (1)| 00:58:47 |
    |  31 |           INDEX RANGE SCAN             | QUI_IDX_INVTRANS_ARC1         |   367K|       |  3466   (1)| 00:00:42 |
    |  32 |      VIEW                              | MV_SKU                        |    37 |  3626 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  33 |       UNION-ALL PARTITION              |                               |       |       |            |          |
    |  34 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    34 |     3   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  35 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  36 |        MAT_VIEW ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID  | MV_SKU                        |     1 |    46 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    |  37 |         INDEX UNIQUE SCAN              | PK_SKU                        |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |
    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------So ,after checking the recommended plan I tried to execute the query with the hints,even then it is picking up the indexes in the explain plan.So please kindly help in solving the issue
    The pk_sku is the index created on client_id and sku_id columns
    Thanks
    GV

    riedelme wrote:
    My experience is differernt - hints will be followed if the optimizer determines they will be beneficial and not if they will not, including my current project on 11gR2. The example below (unfortunately only 11gR1) disproves your theory, showing the index hint is followed and that the cost increases by a factor of five.
    The most common cases of the optimizer apparently ignoring a hint are due to operator error, the hint is not well formed, or cannot be followed. There are a couple of documented cases where a hint will be ignored - first_rows used in CTAS is one.
    Jonathan Lewis writes a lot about it on his blog showing that the optimizer always acts on a well formed hint if it is at all possible.
    SQL> create table t (n number not null, c varchar2(1000));
    Table created.
    SQL> insert into t select 1, rpad('x',1000,'x')
      2  from dual connect by level <= 50000;
    50000 rows created.
    SQL> create index t_ix on t (n);
    Index created.
    SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user, 't', cascade => true)
    PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
    SQL> explain plan for
      2  select max(c) from t where n =1;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 2966233522
    | Id  | Operation          | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT   |      |     1 |  1004 |  1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
    |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE    |      |     1 |  1004 |            |          |
    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL| T    | 50000 |    47M|  1574   (1)| 00:00:19 |
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
       2 - filter("N"=1)
    14 rows selected.
    SQL> explain plan for
      2  select /*+ index (t t_ix) */  max(c) from t where n = 1;
    Explained.
    SQL> select * from table(dbms_xplan.display);
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Plan hash value: 3231292748
    | Id  | Operation                    | Name | Rows  | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT             |      |     1 |  1004 |  7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
    |   1 |  SORT AGGREGATE              |      |     1 |  1004 |            |          |
    |   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| T    | 50000 |    47M|  7244   (1)| 00:01:27 |
    |*  3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN          | T_IX | 50000 |       |    98   (0)| 00:00:02 |
    PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
    Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
       3 - access("N"=1)
    15 rows selected.

  • GL Account is not getting picked by billing document

    Hi Gurus,
    one new GL account is set up by our FI team for a accrual condition type.
    case 1:
    Now when i have cancelled the previous created billing doc and trying to create again then the new GL account is not getting picked.
    case 2:
    Whereas when am doing the complete process flow like sales order creation, delivery and billing then the new GL account is getting picked.
    Could you please let me know what would be the reason for this, why its not getting picked in first case.
    Thanks,
    Ashi

    Hello Preety,
    Unless you see the Revenue Account Determination Analysis for the Billing document, it is very difficult to understand the reason. Please click on the Environment >> Acc.Determination Analysis >> Revenue account in the VF03 screen and find the missing assignment.
    Thanks,
    Suman$

  • File not getting picked with Sender Adapter

    Hello Experts,
    i have configured file sender adapter which is polling configured directory every 60 sec. But i could see file not getting picked up. when looked into Communication channel monitoring i could see following error:
    Putting message into send queue failed, due to: com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.DuplicateMessageException : Message ID aa2ec9a0-44b3-11dc-9c5b-0003baa19669(OUTBOUND) already exists in database: com.sap.sql.DuplicateKeyException: ORA-00001: unique constraint (SAPDX1DB.SYS_C00120924) violated.
    is this due to adapter cache. we are on SP20.
    has anybody faced this problem earlier?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Rajeev

    Hello
    actually there was small problem in file generation and hence it was failing in message mapping which is resolved. but still that problem is there when it is attempting to delete the file. hence it is not able to delete that file.
    can we manually clear the send queues or should we refresh CPA cache?
    Thanks
    Rajeev

  • Output Message Type MAHN not getting picked up in PO

    Hello Experts
       I have configured customized output type ZMAH (similar to MAHN) for reminder process. When I am creating PO this output type is not getting picked up automatically. If I am maintaining it manually I am able to send message for ME9F (Purchase Order) and ME91F (Reminder) successfully. Upon deremination analysis I am getting this message 502 " Output ignored (requirement 103 not fulfilled) ". Reminder are getting picked up from Purchase Value Key to PO.
    Any help is appreciated.
    Thanks
    Ankit

    Hello Tej
      I have maintained output device but same result.
    Here I am listing all parameters that I have used for configuration can anyone please take a look and let me know if I am missing anything
    Steps for new Message Type for PO Reminder (ZMAH)
    1.     Defined new Table 026 Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
                                                        (ii) 027 Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
    2.     Defined new access sequence Z515 Access Sequence for Archiving.
    Following are parameters to the Access Sequence
    Access Sequence Number = 1
    Table = 026
    Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Document Type
    Requirement = 103
    Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
    Access Sequence Number = 2
    Table = 027
    Description = Purchasing Output Determination: Purch. Org./Vendor for EDI
    Requirement = 103
    Exclusive = Yes (box checked)
    3.     Maintain Output Type ZMAH for PO
    General Data
    Access Sequence = Z515
    Access to condition (Checked)
    Multiple Issuing (Checked)
    Change Output
    Program = SAPFM06P
    FORM Routine = ENTRY_NEU
    Replacement of Text Symbol
    Program = SAPMM06E
    FORM Routine = TEXT_SYMBOL_REPLACE
    Default Values
    Dispatch Time = Send Immediately (when saving application)
    Transmission Medium = External Send
    Communication Strategy = 0001 (E-mail Document)
    Processing Routines
    Transmission Medium = 5 (External Send)
    Program = SAPFM06P
    Form Routine = ENTRY_NEU
    Form = MEDRUCK
    Partner Roles
    Medium = External Send
    Funct = VN
    Name = Vendor
    4.     Fine-Tuned Control: Purchase Order
    Oprat. = 3
    CType = ZMAH
    Name = Output for Reminder
    Short Text = Urging letter (expediter)/reminder
    Update Print Related Data = Yes (checked)
    5.     Maintain Message Determination Schema: Purchase Order
    Procedure RMBEF1 (Purchase Order)
    Step = 101
    Cntr = 3
    CTyp = ZMAH
    Description = Output for Reminder
    Requirement = 103
    6.     Assign Schema to Purchase Order
    Procedure RMBEF1
    7.     Define Partner Roles for Purchase Order
    Out. = ZMAH
    Med = 5 (External Send)
    Funct = VN
    Name = Output for Reminder
    Name = Vendor
    8.     Test Condition Maintained in MN04 (Master Data)
    Purch. Org. = 0001
    Vendor = 101281
    Partner Funct = VN
    Medium = 5 (External Send)
    Date/Time = 4 Send immediately (when saving application)
    Output Device = LP01
    Cover Page Text = Reminder PO number &EKKO-EBELN&
    Also I have configured Purchasing Value Key, reminders are coming to PO correctly.
    Thanks
    Ankit

  • Debit Items not getting picked while making payment with F110

    HI,
    When making payment with F110, items with Debit balance is not getting picked.
    Example:
    Payment method is assigned in the Maser data.
    For a particular vendor one item has a credit balance- posting key 31.
    We have posted another JV with F-02 and debited that vendor with Posting key 21. (Payment Method is not entered in the line item)
    When we run F110 the credit balance is picked and debit balance is being shown in exception list.
    When we got to FB02 and insert payment method in debit line item and then again run the F110 then system pickes all line items and pays the net amount.
    The question is why system is not considering Payment Method from Master Data in debit  line item, while in credit line item it is picking payment method from the master data.
    Do I need to do any setting for it so that it should automatically take payment method from master data even in case of Debit line items.
    Regards
    Sanjay

    Hi All,
    Thanks for your quick replies.
    But it does not solve my problem.
    When I am not assigning any payment method to either Debit or credit line items, system picks (payment method from Master data) for only credit line items and ignores debit line items.
    But the problem is that when I assign payment method to debit line item (which is similar to what has been assigned to vendor Master Data) system groups both debit and credit line items and makes payment of only net amount.
    My question was why system considered the debit line item for making payment if I manually enter payment method in the line item, if system has been designed only for out going payment. In my opinion It should have reacted similarly irrespective of whether payment method entered in the line item or not.
    Regards
    Sanjay

  • Items not getting picked up in Return sales order

    Dear all,
    I am creating a return sales order with reference to a sales order.
    In my delivery doc the items can be categorised into 3 types:
    1- Picking done; Movement type determined
    2- Picking done; Movement type not determined
    3- Picking not-done; Movement type determined
    In the return order, only the items of 1st type are coming. Why others not getting picked up? Can they be entered manually?
    regards
    Sapshed

    Dear Hrishikesh,
    Thats Ok. Picking is done only for those items for which Relevant for Picking is ticked.
    What I want to know is that, for items that have either their picking not done or Goods movement not determined, they are not getting automatically picked up while I create a Return order w/r to a sales order.
    thanks
    Sapshed

  • File to File (file not getting picked)

    Hi ,
    I am having a file to file scenario. My file is not getting processed from  the source directory. When i check in the communication channel monitoring bith my sender and rcvr communication chanels are wrking fine.
    I have placed the source file with the name mentioned in the sender communciation channel.The processing mode is Archive.
    My file Name is Actual_Labour_Cost.NE*.txt in Sender cc.
    so i placed the file With Actual_Labour_Cost.NE.
    Kindly suggest.
    Regards
    Sai

    Hi,
    If you have using thec orrect file name and extesnsion in the comms channel and still the file is not getting picked up then Could you check the file permission/authorizatios for the XI user you are using in XI to pick up the file from the source directory ?
    The file should at least have the permissions to Read/Write.
    Regards,
    Vishal

Maybe you are looking for