Server is too slow

I have oracle 9i database on sun solaris OS
IBM server.
2GB RAM
4 hard disk
45 users are login in to the system.
Its almost dead slow and some time user get out from the system.It is almost in hold sitution.
When ever we restart the server all the process clear and works properly.After some time its started slow and performance got detoriate.
gradualy its gets slow by the time and one point time it is dead slow and takes 30 min to commit transaction.which takes 20 sec at normal time.When i restart server it works normaly but gradually it gets slow again.
please write some procedure to checkup
database configuration is standard

You should use statspack to check what are the main waits.
Some indicators to check :
- too many fts/excessive IO => check sql statements (missing index, wrong where clause)
- explain plan for most important queries : using cbo or rbo ? If cbo, statistics should be up to date. If rbo, check acces path.
-excessive logfile switch (> 5 per hour) : increase logfile or disable logging
- undo waits => not enough rollback segments (if you don't set AUM)
- data waits => alter initrans, pctfree, pctused
- too many chaining rows => rebuild set of datas or rebuild table
- too many levels in indexes => rebuild index
- excessive parsing : use bind variable or alter parameter cursor_sharing
- too many sort on disks => increase sort_area_size and create others temporary tablespace on separate disks
- too many blocks reads for a row => db_block_size too few or too many chaining rows
- too many lru contention => increase latches
- OS swapping/paging ?
Too improve performance :
- alter and tune some parameters : optimizer_mode, sort_area_size, shared_pool_size, optimizer_index_cost_adj, db_file_multiblock_read_count...
- keep most useful packages in memory
- gather regularly statistics (if using cbo)
How do your users access to the db ?
Jean-François Léguillier
Consultant DBA

Similar Messages

  • New iphone 6 with ios 8.0 crushed and didnt open again. call center told me that use itunes to update 8.0.2 but server is too slow and didnt let me download it. it stopts in the middle of the session. how can i download it from another link or server

    new iphone 6 with ios 8.0 crushed and didnt open again. call center told me that use itunes to update 8.0.2 but server is too slow and didnt let me download it. it stopts in the middle of the session. how can i download it from another link or server. by the way i try to dowload from turkey.

    anyone help me there? )=

  • Mail server is too slow to deliver the mail to internal domain

    Hi,
    My mail server faster enough to send the mails to other domains, but when i try to send mail to my own domain it too slow some time it take 30 t0 40 minutes to deliver the mail.
    Please help
    Thanks,
    Gulab Pasha

    You should use statspack to check what are the main waits.
    Some indicators to check :
    - too many fts/excessive IO => check sql statements (missing index, wrong where clause)
    - explain plan for most important queries : using cbo or rbo ? If cbo, statistics should be up to date. If rbo, check acces path.
    -excessive logfile switch (> 5 per hour) : increase logfile or disable logging
    - undo waits => not enough rollback segments (if you don't set AUM)
    - data waits => alter initrans, pctfree, pctused
    - too many chaining rows => rebuild set of datas or rebuild table
    - too many levels in indexes => rebuild index
    - excessive parsing : use bind variable or alter parameter cursor_sharing
    - too many sort on disks => increase sort_area_size and create others temporary tablespace on separate disks
    - too many blocks reads for a row => db_block_size too few or too many chaining rows
    - too many lru contention => increase latches
    - OS swapping/paging ?
    Too improve performance :
    - alter and tune some parameters : optimizer_mode, sort_area_size, shared_pool_size, optimizer_index_cost_adj, db_file_multiblock_read_count...
    - keep most useful packages in memory
    - gather regularly statistics (if using cbo)
    How do your users access to the db ?
    Jean-François Léguillier
    Consultant DBA

  • BI Server performance too slow

    Hi experts,
    I am facing an issue, my OBIEE sits on a Unix Platform. And many time the server performance is too slow, when I check the processes, Java under Orabi user is using more than 50% of the CPU utilization. I need to find the root cause behind it, as it is the production system and is affecting many users.
    Thanks in advance.
    MT

    Thanks Prassu,
    Yes the Server is performing too much calculations, but they are required as need to cache reports at daily level also,
    I have an observation that the MAX_CACHE_ENTRY_SIZE [MAX_CACHE_ENTRY_SIZE = 1 MB;] parameter is set only for 1 MB, I can understand that if any query fetching more data than 1 MB will not be cached. But is there any chance that this will affect the server as well.
    Thanks
    MT

  • MDM with Lion Server is too Slow

    Managing 500 iPads with an iMac Mini Server is a very time Consulting Job, because MDM is too Slow. The reason seems to be postgres database. Any Suggestionen?

    There really isn't enough information here to solve your problem.
    Fair enough, we get it's slow... but when you say "click the Finder icon it spends 10-20 seconds to open", are you talking about on the server itself? or over the network?
    In addition, what do the server logs have to say?
    What about activity monitor? What processes are busy? What about memory utilization?
    There are all kinds of things that can contribute. Far too many to be able to pinpoint from the (lack of) information available.
    All I can say is that reformatting/reinstalling is not likely to be your best option.

  • Connection to Server is too slow!

    Ok, I have a bit of a problem here. I have a server set up with 4 users connected. It takes forever to even load all the folder icons when you connect to the server and open the window. I looked at the AFP information pane in the Server Admin program and it reads that we are getting less than 1MB/Sec. Is there another way for us to connect directly to the server so we can get better speeds or is something not set up correctly?

    For what it's worth, I seem to be having the same problem. I don't have any detailed troubleshooting info to relay yet (forgot to enable error logging, ooops). I've just brought a 10.5.1 AFP only file server (XServe quad Xeon via Gigabit) online this morning for 20-30 users following a week of testing with a limited user base (3-5). The server is hosting 12 share points from four SCSI RAID arrays via Apple's SCSI card. CPU usage is at about 10%, spiking at 40-50% on occasion. Throughput has averaged around 12MB/s. Didn't have any issues while I was in testing (save the Kerberos ticket expiration problem, which I fixed by disabling Kerberos login).
    For what it's worth the 10.4.10 Server (G4, 1.4GHz) sharing the same volumes never had a hiccup like this.

  • ACE Load balancing web page hosted by Microsoft CMS reponding too slow

    My pages hosted by an CMS (content managment server), open too slow when passing trought the ace. Any ideas?
    Regard's,
    Miguel Amaral

    2 GB is the minimum memory configuration to run Yosemite at all. Given that limitation you will constantly need to be mindful of the programs you're running.
    ESET will only place additional demands on that Mac's limited system resources. Uninstall it. It is capable of nothing beneficial and your Mac cannot operate properly with it installed.
    Back up your Mac prior to making any changes to its file system. To learn how to use Time Machine read Mac Basics: Time Machine backs up your Mac - Apple Support.
    ESET offers no obvious way to uninstall it. To do that you must use the "Eset Cyber Security Pro Setup Wizard" included with its installation package.
    Use the Uninstall icon:
    Disregard the blatantly fraudulent "Warning!" that appears:
    Lie about the reason in the following step, which cannot be bypassed. ESET's developer is disingenuous and expects the same of its users:
    ESET's uninstaller leaves components behind but it is sufficiently effective to render this piece of trash inert.

  • The servers gets too slow with JMS Messages

    Hi all,
          Look, Im usin JMS services, with MDB, and work good. Also i kepp a Queue to wronly messages (basiclly for comunications between R3 and Portal). Thats messages have seted a "Time to Live" equals to one day, so, they dissapair when this time are completed. But for some reasson, my server gets too slow and show exeptions of Time Out. Maybe the messages are not "killed" really, and consume memory from the server or some like that.
          The think are, that im deleting manually the Queue from the Visual Administration, later than this, the process back to keep the execution time and gets faster.
          If some know some or had this same trouble, please help me...
    Thanks in advance,
    Jorge.

    I see. Thanks for your advice
    I always had this setting on my previous devices (Sony Xperia X10 pro, Samsung Galaxy Slll) and thought it wouldn't do anything. It just got slow when it actually was updating.
    Now I turned that setting off, the wifi worked quite long again (10min) but then it was gone. Unfortunately.

  • ITUNES DOWNLOAD TOO SLOW

    Im downloading the Itunes again because the update could not find my iphone and ipad!! but the server is too slow 4 hours already !!
    is someone alse having the same problem

    Unless you are using dial-up, that's way too slow.
    What do you mean you are downloading iTunes? iTunes is part of the iOS and not a separate download for iOS devices.
     Cheers, Tom

  • Preview app is too slow to open PDF from Server Snow Leopard

    Hi
    After the Lion update into a MacBook Clients the app Preview has become too slow to open PDF files from Mac server OS Snow Leopard.
    Preview app isn't not slow to open PDF present into local system hard disk.
    Can you help me to solve this?

    i've tested the network connection but it's works perfectly.
    if i open network files with Office or other applications there aren't problems.
    Only preview app is slow to open pdf's from server.

  • Application running too slow on sun T5440 but run normal on sun M3000

    Hi all,
    I have application running on sun server T5440 4x8x1.4 GHz, 64 GB RAM, application running very slow though load average too low. when I install my application on another server SUN M3000 (One CPU 1x8x2.5GHz, 8GB RAM), application run smoothly.
    Here is my server T5440 info:
    Code:
    bash-3.00# uname -a
    SunOS 5.10 Generic_142909-17 sun4v sparc SUNW,T5440
    Psrinfo -pv
    Code:
    bash-3.00# psrinfo -pv
    The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (0-63)
    UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 0, clock 1414 MHz)
    The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (64-127)
    UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 1, clock 1414 MHz)
    The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (128-191)
    UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 2, clock 1414 MHz)
    The physical processor has 64 virtual processors (192-255)
    UltraSPARC-T2+ (chipid 3, clock 1414 MHz)
    /etc/system
    Code:
    set semsys:seminfo_semopm=10000
    set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=10000
    set semsys:seminfo_semmni=1024
    set max_nprocs=50000
    set msgsys:msginfo_msgmnb=2097152
    set msgsys:msginfo_msgmni=2560
    set msgsys:msginfo_msgtql=2560
    set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=1073741824
    set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=1000
    set rlim_fd_cur=10000
    Ipcs
    Code:
    bash-3.00# ipcs -a
    IPC status from as of Wed Jun 13 12:31:01 ICT 2012
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP CBYTES QNUM QBYTES LSPID LRPID STIME RTIME CTIME
    Message Queues:
    q 62 0x1388 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:22
    q 61 0x1387 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:22
    q 60 0x1318 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:22
    q 59 0x12a9 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 9069 9071 10:25:38 10:25:38 8:36:22
    q 58 0x100f --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 9069 9070 10:06:16 10:06:16 8:36:22
    q 57 0xfa0 -Rrw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 9071 9069 10:25:38 10:25:38 8:36:22
    q 56 0xf30 --rw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:36:20
    q 55 0xc27 -Rrw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 0 0 no-entry no-entry 8:28:14
    q 54 0xbb8 -Rrw-rw-rw- topx topx topx topx 0 0 2097152 172 9066 10:47:08 10:47:08 8:28:14
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NATTCH SEGSZ CPID LPID ATIME DTIME CTIME
    Shared Memory:
    T ID KEY MODE OWNER GROUP CREATOR CGROUP NSEMS OTIME CTIME
    Semaphores:
    s 104 0x9c4 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 3 12:31:00 8:36:20
    s 103 0xa8c --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:36:20
    s 102 0xd48 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:36:20
    s 101 0xce4 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:36:20
    s 100 0x26de --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 8 10:19:34 8:28:14
    s 99 0xc1c --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:28:14
    s 98 0xbb8 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:43:50 8:28:14
    s 97 0xaf0 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 500 8:36:20 8:28:14
    s 96 0xa28 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 500 8:36:20 8:28:14
    s 95 0x7ee --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1 8:36:20 8:28:14
    s 94 0x7e4 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 1001 8:36:20 8:28:14
    s 93 0x7da --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 220 8:36:20 8:28:14
    s 92 0x7d5 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 200 12:05:15 8:28:14
    s 91 0x7d0 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 200 8:56:42 8:28:14
    s 90 0xc80 --ra-ra-ra- topx topx topx topx 2 12:31:01 8:27:52 –a
    Prstat
    Code:
    PID USERNAME SIZE RSS STATE PRI NICE TIME CPU PROCESS/NLWP
    9202 topx 1460M 893M sleep 59 0 0:16:37 0.2% integrity_check/1
    12455 root 3880K 3600K cpu65 59 0 0:00:00 0.0% prstat/1
    9080 topx 142M 130M sleep 59 0 0:00:52 0.0% intf_resp_low/1
    9125 topx 102M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:36 0.0% interface_vsc/1
    9121 topx 88M 80M sleep 59 0 0:00:32 0.0% interface_tcu/1
    9120 topx 89M 80M sleep 59 0 0:00:29 0.0% interface_rcm/1
    9124 topx 87M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:29 0.0% baplie_merge_v2/1
    9122 topx 86M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:28 0.0% interface_eih/1
    9115 topx 88M 77M sleep 59 0 0:00:33 0.0% intf_batch_even/1
    9114 topx 88M 77M sleep 59 0 0:00:39 0.0% intf_event/1
    9117 topx 87M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:32 0.0% interface_bxy/1
    9118 topx 86M 78M sleep 59 0 0:00:29 0.0% interface_ppm/1
    NPROC USERNAME SWAP RSS MEMORY TIME CPU
    41 topx 334M 2237M 3.4% 0:30:17 0.3%
    43 root 186M 195M 0.3% 0:14:45 0.0%
    1 noaccess 152M 136M 0.2% 0:04:00 0.0%
    1 smmsp 3688K 11M 0.0% 0:00:04 0.0%
    1 lp 1208K 3880K 0.0% 0:00:00 0.0%
    6 daemon 7264K 9944K 0.0% 0:00:26 0.0%
    Total: 93 processes, 259 lwps, load averages: 0.40, 0.39, 0.39
    Prstat –mL
    Code:
    bash-3.00# prstat -mL
    PID USERNAME USR SYS TRP TFL DFL LCK SLP LAT VCX ICX SCL SIG PROCESS/LWPID
    9202 topx 0.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 99 0.0 2 0 5 0 integrity_ch/1
    9080 topx 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 5 0 20 0 intf_resp_lo/1
    9114 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 13 0 66 0 intf_event/1
    17282 root 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 20 1 324 0 prstat/1
    9117 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 1 70 0 interface_bx/1
    9118 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 1 70 0 interface_pp/1
    9115 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 15 0 80 0 intf_batch_e/1
    9121 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_tc/1
    9125 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_vs/1
    9120 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_rc/1
    9123 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 0 70 0 interface_vs/1
    9124 topx 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 10 1 70 0 baplie_merge/1
    9122 topx 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 8 0 56 0 interface_ei/1
    9119 topx 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 8 0 56 0 interface_cp/1
    9204 topx 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 15 1 1K 0 sys_check/1
    259 root 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 13 2 98 7 in.mpathd/1
    1 root 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 3 0 99 3 init/1
    1337 noaccess 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 100 0 100 0 java/14
    140 root 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100 0.0 19 0 114 0 nscd/851
    Total: 90 processes, 256 lwps, load averages: 0.40, 0.40, 0.39
    Vmstat
    Code:
    bash-3.00# vmstat 1 10
    kthr memory page disk faults cpu
    r b w swap free re mf pi po fr de sr m0 m1 m2 m3 in sy cs us sy id
    0 0 0 87720712 60562856 173 645 199 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 0 886 2819 525 0 1 99
    1 0 0 87563976 59743040 73 327 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 747 2831 439 0 1 99
    0 0 0 87563656 59742808 61 306 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 770 2684 427 0 1 99
    1 0 0 87563656 59742824 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 886 1302 525 0 1 99
    1 0 0 87563656 59742816 62 305 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 722 2652 420 3 1 96
    1 0 0 87563656 59742840 554 2777 0 139 139 0 0 0 0 0 0 959 9736 749 1 1 97
    0 0 0 87563456 59742672 1155 5735 0 292 292 0 0 0 0 0 0 1113 17489 1145 1 3 96
    1 0 0 87563656 59742840 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 845 1613 654 0 1 99
    0 0 0 87563656 59742856 62 305 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 900 2647 526 0 1 99
    0 0 0 87563656 59742856 62 304 0 15 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 683 2661 396 0 1 99
    Mpstat
    Code:
    CPU minf mjf xcal intr ithr csw icsw migr smtx srw syscl usr sys wt idl
    0 0 0 130 261 1 121 0 13 1 0 0 0 1 0 99
    1 0 0 35 133 2 143 0 9 6 0 64 0 0 0 100
    2 0 0 5 20 2 17 0 3 0 0 29 1 0 0 99
    3 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100
    4 0 0 3 14 0 15 0 2 2 0 13 0 0 0 100
    73 0 0 474330 77 3 0 7 0 2 0 2596 67 33 0 0
    73 0 0 487701 37 0 0 7 0 8 0 2670 66 34 0 0
    73 0 0 476377 14 0 0 8 0 1 0 2610 66 34 0 0
    78 0 0 473950 11 1 0 7 0 13 0 2593 67 33 0 0
    78 0 0 480562 9 0 0 7 0 4 0 2630 66 34 0 0
    79 0 0 320989 14 1 0 8 0 0 0 1766 77 23 0 0
    79 0 0 479148 9 0 0 7 0 8 0 2622 66 34 0 0
    79 0 0 479426 13 0 0 7 0 2 0 2622 67 33 0 0
    79 0 0 488949 9 0 0 8 0 13 0 2678 66 34 0 0
    64 0 0 482229 15 2 0 8 0 7 0 2638 65 35 0 0
    77 0 0 475571 14 1 0 7 0 8 0 2602 67 33 0 0
    69 0 0 467795 22 1 0 7 0 40 0 2563 66 34 0 0
    69 0 0 318623 9 1 0 7 0 8 0 1751 77 23 0 0
    66 0 0 465179 92 1 2 8 0 62 0 2545 66 34 0 0
    When my application running, some of CPU have IDLE state = 0 and hold the CPU while another CPU have IDLE state 100. I think this is my bottleneck but I cannot find any solution for solve that.
    Netstat
    Code:
    bash-3.00# netstat -i
    Name Mtu Net/Dest Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Collis Queue
    lo0 8232 loopback localhost 244022 0 244022 0 0 0
    nxge0 1500 TOPX-01-DUMMY1 TOPX-01-DUMMY1 3594863 0 5801650 0 0 0
    nxge1 1500 TOPX-01-DUMMY2 TOPX-01-DUMMY2 160954 0 151230 0 0 0
    iostat
    Code:
    bash-3.00# iostat -xn
    extended device statistics
    r/s w/s kr/s kw/s wait actv wsvc_t asvc_t %w %b device
    0.1 0.1 1.5 30.8 0.0 0.0 1.8 9.0 0 0 md/d0
    0.0 0.1 0.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 0 0 md/d1
    0.0 0.1 0.8 30.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 0 0 md/d2
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 15.2 0 0 md/d3
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 10.9 0 0 md/d4
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0 0 md/d5
    0.0 0.0 2.2 1.5 0.0 0.0 0.8 7.4 0 0 md/d6
    0.0 0.0 1.1 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0 0 md/d7
    0.0 0.0 1.1 0.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.2 0 0 md/d8
    0.0 0.1 0.4 0.6 0.0 0.0 7.6 10.0 0 0 md/d9
    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.1 0 0 md/d10
    0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.8 0 0 md/d11
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 10.4 0 0 md/d12
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.5 0 0 md/d13
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.4 0 0 md/d14
    0.1 0.5 2.1 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.9 0 0 c0t0d0
    0.1 0.5 2.1 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 9.8 0 0 c0t1d0
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 c1t0d0
    0.9 0.9 125.3 123.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 34.2 0 2 c4t600144F0CC00C29A00004D1E456F0003d0
    0.3 0.7 20.7 53.9 0.0 0.0 0.2 8.2 0 0 c4t600144F0CC00C29A00004D1E43880001d0
    0.1 0.2 50.7 111.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.1 0 1 c4t600144F0CC00C29A00004D1E453E0002d0
    Please help me find the bottleneck of my T5440 server?Thanks so much for all your help.

    Moderator Comment and Action:
    @ O.P.,
    You cross-posted this to at least two other forum web sites:
    http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/solaris-opensolaris-20/application-running-too-slow-on-sun-sparc-t5440-but-run-normal-on-sun-m3000-4175411155/
    http://www.unix.com/solaris/189945-application-running-too-slow-sun-sparc-t5440-but-run-normal-sun-m3000.html
    ... and didn't think that was important enough to simply mention the fact.
    Timestamps suggest that OTN was the last place you posted to.
    Poor forum etiquette.
    Why would anyone spend the time to try to give help that you have already received elsewhere? That's a waste of their time.
    (Yes, you already received the suggestion to use Dtrace in one of those other sites.)
    This thread is locked as irrelevant.

  • Java web start application runs too slow...

    Hello,
    I am new to Java Web Start. I have created a java web start application and when i enable web start from local Execution, then it works perfectly well. But when i upload it on server and then download the application, then it is too too slow...i mean it takes minutes to get the output on clicking some button....my jnlp file is as under:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
    <jnlp codebase="http://(web server code base)" href="launch.jnlp" spec="1.0+">
    <information>
    <title>ERD</title>
    <vendor>Deepika Gohil</vendor>
    <homepage href="http://appframework.dev.java.net"/>
    <description>A simple java desktop application based on Swing Application Framework</description>
    <description kind="short">ER Deign Tools</description>
    </information>
    <update check="always"/>
    <security>
    <all-permissions/>
    </security>
    <resources>
    <j2se version="1.5+"/>
    <jar href="ERD_1_2.jar" main="true"/>
    <jar href="lib/appframework-1.0.3.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/swing-worker-1.1.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxb-impl.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxb-xjc.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxb1-impl.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/activation.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxb-api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jsr173_api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/ant-contrib-1.0b3.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxb-impl.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxb-xjc.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/FastInfoset.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/gmbal-api-only.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/http.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxws-rt.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxws-tools.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/management-api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/mimepull.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/policy.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/saaj-impl.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/stax-ex.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/streambuffer.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/woodstox.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxws-api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jsr181-api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jsr250-api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/saaj-api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/activation.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jaxb-api.jar"/>
    <jar href="lib/jsr173_api.jar"/>
    </resources>
    <application-desc main-class="erd.screen1">
    </application-desc>
    </jnlp>
    I dont understand the reason. Could you please help me out.
    Thank you,
    Deepika Gohil.

    Check your web server's access logs to see how many requests web start is sending for each jar. After you've loaded the application the first time, for each subsequent launch, if you've got everything configured right, you should only see requests for the JNLP file and maybe some gifs because web start should load everything else out of the cache (if you're using the version-based download protocol). Or if you're using the basic download protocol, then you might see requests for each jar file, but even in this case, if your web server is prepared to evaluate the last-updated attribute for each jar request and for jars that have not changed, respond with no actual payload and a header value of Not-Modified, then that should run almost as fast.
    You might also want to consider changing the "check" attribute of the "update" element from "always" to "background" for a couple of reasons. It should allow your app to start sooner (but this means that you might have to launch once or twice after an update is applied to the web server before the update shows up on the workstation). Also, my impression is that "always" is broken and prevents web start from ever checking to see if your jnlp file has been updated if you launch your app from a web start shortcut - launching from a browser is less likely to have this problem, depending on how often your browser is configured to check for updated resources.

  • Built In application "YouTube" Is Way too slow!

    Hey guys, I'm new here btw, so hi to all.
    When i watch videos on youtube built in app IT TAKES FOREVER! to buffer the videos, I'm using WI-FI and my net connection is 20mb, I would love to use it but it just takes toooooo long to buffer it would take me 4-5 minute to watch a one minute clip, Any help you'll be my new idol!
    The strange this is though, on my computer they load in literally seconds if not instantly are are completely buffered in under 5 seconds for almost any video, yet i could hardly watch a 2 minute youtube video, it buffers then 20 seconds later it stops and it won't supering buffer, i press play nothing happens, it just like it either WAYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY too slow or it stops buffering completely, all i know is with youtube being such a big feature, it is almost useless by the terrible coding, or what ever the problem is to make it soo slow, i hear so much people talking about youtube and there iphone but mine is just too painfully slow to watch(and no 100% not my connection)

    Is there any youtube settings??? Can any setting be changed which relate to youtube? And is it possible to watch youtube through safari and not through the standard application?
    NO, there are no settings. Flash will not play in Safari yet, but there is a workaround using VideoHamster.
    Here are a couple of Flash YouTube videos on my server that I converted to QT with CosmoPod. How do they load for you? I have a 1M up cable connection. They should start loading and playing after a few seconds. YouTube videos start playing after about 5 seconds on mine.
    http://bmer.servemp3.com/test/
    Dave M.
    MacOSG Founder/Ambassador  An Apple User Group  iTunes: MacOSG Podcast
    Creator of 'Mac611 - Mobile Mac Support' (designed exclusively for an iPhone/iPod touch)

  • Bumblebee performance is too slow

    Hi everyone,
    This is my second post in this forum and it has been only 2 days that I met Arch. Before, I was using Ubuntu for 3 years, but due to low performance in my PC, unfortunately, I decided to say good bye which was hard to say.
    Now, I am trying to have the same setup as my previous laptop and Bumblebee was one of them. I followed the instructions here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Bumblebee.
    It seems that bumblebee is installed and working, however, the FPS is too slow:
    $ optirun glxspheres64 -info
    Polygons in scene: 62464
    Visual ID of window: 0x20
    Context is Direct
    OpenGL Renderer: GeForce GT 520MX/PCIe/SSE2
    0.023848 frames/sec - 0.021114 Mpixels/sec
    Without optirun I get:
    $ glxspheres64 -info
    Polygons in scene: 62464
    Visual ID of window: 0x20
    Context is Direct
    OpenGL Renderer: Mesa DRI Intel(R) Sandybridge Mobile
    0.033237 frames/sec - 0.029426 Mpixels/sec
    0.029968 frames/sec - 0.026533 Mpixels/sec
    This is impossible as I was getting very good results before.
    I am wondering if I did something wrong, or missed anything.
    Just for information, system specs:
    Intel i7 2670QM 2.2 GHZ
    4 GB RAM
    1 GB GeForce GT 520MX
    512 MB Intel Graphics
    I played 0ad with and without optirun and the performance was good in both of them, but not sure if it switches the video cards itself.
    I also have bbswitch installed.
    Any help would be appreciated. Thank you.
    Last edited by wakeup12 (2014-09-27 14:29:19)

    Hello,
    Can you please explain in a little more detail the scenario you testing? Are you comparing a SQL Database in Europe against a SQL Database in India? Or a SQL Database with a local, on-premise SQL Server installation?
    In case of the first scenario, the roundtrip latency for the connection to the datacenter might play a role. 
    If you are comparing to a local installation, please note that you might be running against completely different hardware specifications and without network delay, resulting in very different results.
    In both cases you can use the below blog post to assess the resource utilization of the SQL Database during the operation:
    http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/11/azure-sql-database-introduces-new-near-real-time-performance-metrics/
    If the DB utilizes up to 100% you might have to consider to upgrade to a higher performance level to achieve the throughput you are looking for.
    Thanks,
    Jan 

  • Performance is too slow on SQL Azure box

    Hi,
    Performance is too slow on SQL Azure box (Located in Europe)
    Below query returns 500,000 rows in 18 Min. on SQL Azure box (connected via SSMS, located in India)
    SELECT * FROM TABLE_1
    Whereas, on local server it returns 500,000 rows in (30 sec.)
    SQL Azure configuration:
    Service Tier/Performance Level : Premium/P1
    DTU       : 100
    MAX DB Size : 500GB     
    Max Worker Threads : 200          
    Max Sessions     : 2400
    Benchmark Transaction Rate      : 105 transactions per second
    Predictability : Best
    Any suggestion would be highly appreciated.
    Thanks,

    Hello,
    Can you please explain in a little more detail the scenario you testing? Are you comparing a SQL Database in Europe against a SQL Database in India? Or a SQL Database with a local, on-premise SQL Server installation?
    In case of the first scenario, the roundtrip latency for the connection to the datacenter might play a role. 
    If you are comparing to a local installation, please note that you might be running against completely different hardware specifications and without network delay, resulting in very different results.
    In both cases you can use the below blog post to assess the resource utilization of the SQL Database during the operation:
    http://azure.microsoft.com/blog/2014/09/11/azure-sql-database-introduces-new-near-real-time-performance-metrics/
    If the DB utilizes up to 100% you might have to consider to upgrade to a higher performance level to achieve the throughput you are looking for.
    Thanks,
    Jan 

Maybe you are looking for