Server migration questions

Hi all: I will soon be migrating an OES2sp3 server to OES11sp1. I have read through the migration docs but still I have a few questions I need answered/clarified.
1. When installing OES11 on the target server, I have to give it a name and bring it into the tree. When the migration takes place, will all instances of the target server, both in OES and SLES, get renamed to that of the source server? Most notably the internal server CA_default certificate, which gets named during OES installation.
2. Prior to migration and docs say to create the driver store and print manager on the target server. Do I just give them a temp name as the transfer ID task will rename everything when it runs?
3. The server being migrated is our CA server. My plan was to move the CA to a different server temporarily to another OES server, and once the migration is finished, move it back. Does that seem reasonable?
Thanks, Chris.

I hate when I do that.
>>> smflood<[email protected]> 12/12/2013 6:06 PM >>>
cmosentine;2297649 Wrote:
> Hi all: I will soon be migrating an OES2sp3 server to OES11sp1. I have
> read through the migration docs but still I have a few questions I need
> answered/clarified.
Given that you are asking about migrating from OES2 SP3 to OES11 SP1
then I suggest reposting in the OES11 (Linux) Migration forum @
https://forums.novell.com/novell-pro...oes-migration/
as this is a NetWare-related forum.
HTH.
Simon
Novell Knowledge Partner
If you find this post helpful and are logged into the web interface,
please show your appreciation and click on the star below. Thanks.
smflood's Profile: https://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=617
View this thread: https://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=473395

Similar Messages

Short Message Server Migration Question

For migration from MS 5.2 to 6.2, should the UpgradeMsg5toMsg6 and subsequent scripts be run as root or the email admin id? I've not found it explicitly stated, so I've
been running as root.
Thanks,
Keith

You should be fine running as either root/email admin id. Where you may have problems is later down the track if the files created by UpgradeMsg5toMsg6.pl are not accessible to other scripts due to say the umask of the root/email admin id.
Is there a particular issue you think was created by running as root/email admin id?Just trying to cover all the bases. In the make_mboxlistdb_changes.sh, it does a "chown" for the admin on the mboxlist directory. In the other scripts, there are "cp" command without the "-p" option, so it got me thinking about permissions.
I guess if it doesn't say to use the admin id, root would be the choice.
Thanks for the input,
Keith

Server Migration

I'm having a problem setfing up migration on my Managed Servers on Welbogic 9.2 mp2. First, My problem.
When I try to manually migrate ManagedServer1 from MachineA to MachineB:
Nodemanger shutdowns ManagedServer1
Nodemanager removes the interface with the floating IP (so far so good)
(here is where the problem starts)
Nodemanager brings up the interface back on MachineA
Nodemanager starts ManagesServer1 on MachineA (all this is suppose to happen on MachineB).
This doesn't help me if it migrates it to the same machine!!!
I quick overview of how things are set up.
1) I have two machines, MachineA and MachineB running Solaris 10
2) I have the admin server running on MachineA listening on the static ip of 139 and ManagedServer1 listening on the floating IP of 169 (fyi, don't want give out IP, so I made a number up)
3) I have ManagedServer2 running on MachineB with the floating IP of 170.
4) I created a weblogic user that has ssh trust config between the two machines and has the proper authority to create and bring down an interface.
5) Created 2 Unix machines, Type SSH with the shell command ssh -l legalint -o PasswordAuthentication=no -p %P %H /opt/bea/weblogic92/common/bin/wlscontrol.sh -d %D -n /legalint/mtdom/ndmgr -c -f startManagedWebLogic.sh -s %S %C
6) Network Time Protocal Config is set
7) Lease database schema is created with corresponding data source and has two tables ACTIVE and ACTIVE_MT
8) Server migration progerties configured: cluster datasource is set (In my directions it tells me to leave the Canidate machines blank). Managed servers auto migration set to true and primary and back-up machine set and auto-restart set to true.
Any help is appreciated.
Tom.

The best way to deal with certificates and FQDN's in ZESM is to use commercial issued certificates or from the company's internal CA. Don't use the built-in product self-signed certificates under any reason for production deployments. The reason behind that, is that the internal ZESM certificate has its private key marked as non-exportable. So you'll not be able to export it from one server and move to another.
For the server FQDN, create an A or Alias record in DNS to something like: "zesm.company.com", and point it to the actual ZESM server, that way, once you need to move all users from server, all that you need to do is to import the commercial certificate and point the DNS record to the new server IP Address.
I did a couple of deployments in that way, with no issues.
Hope this helps.
>>>
From: mauro vaccari<[email protected]>
To:novell.support.zenworks.endpoint-security-management
Date: 1/19/2010 7:36 AM
Subject: Server Migration
Hi,
planning the upgrade to the imminent release of ZESM 4.1 we would like
to reinstall the server because it has undergone many installations.
For security reason and for don't stop production we want to install
ZESM 4.1 in a new server with the same ip and name of the actual then we
want try It in a test VLAN.
My question is:
when we want to pass the new server in production or before ZESM
instalation could we migrate the IIS certificate from the old server to
new one? so the client should not be involved.
Thank you for help
mauro_vaccari
mauro_vaccari's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=16902
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=398639

Migration questions

Question no.1
Using GroupWise server migration utility, the default for the post
office destination is /var/opt/novell/groupwise/mail. I have created
home_ncp volume mounted at /home in Linux server and also mount a volume
named GroupWise at /home which is home_ncp volume. Therefore, I want to
change the default path to groupwise volume I mounted. What is the
correct path for this, /home/groupwise or /home_ncp/groupwise? The
reason I ask this question is because I can only groupwise at /home_ncp
from my xp workstation. Please advise!
Question no.2
Which one shall I migrate first, post office or domain?
Thank you very much!

April,
It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
- Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
the other self support options and support programs available.
- You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
correct newsgroup. (http://support.novell.com/forums)
Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
http://support.novell.com/forums/faq_general.html
If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
Good luck!
Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
http://support.novell.com/forums/

File server migration with Offline files involved

Hi,
We are planning a file server migration in following weeks.
This morning, our customer came with the good old "Ow, and I just thought about something else"
Here's the scenario :
-They are using 1 network drive
-That network drive is made offline available for all laptop users
-Those users are spread out in several country's. No VPN connection
-They are working for months on their offline network drive, right in the middle of the wood, no internet connection, it was already short for them to find power supply for their laptop ...
...nevermind
-The day they come back to the office, the file server to which points the network drives will be offline.
Now the 1 Million question : What happens with their "dirty" files ?
yep exactly. those they changed 6 months ago, have no clue about if you ask them but certainly will the day I will clear the damn cache.
My first analysis :
-The new file server will have another name, no alias or re-using the old name is possible (the customer don't want to)
-I can't tell to those laptops "hey for that offline cache, please use this new network drive"
So :
>> Those users have to identify manually files they changed while being offline, copy them locally on their machine and work that way the time they come back to the main office.
>> When they finally show up, clear the cache, offline the new network drive and replace file copied locally
>> If no internet connexion available in the branch office, let them work locally, it's still better than this hybrid-non-sense 6month offline folder "solution". If internet connexion is mainly available remotely, propose some Citrix/View/RDS
Setup which is, for me, a more professional looking solution
Someone has another (better?) idea/solution ?

Hi,
I suggest you ask users to collect their laptop to internet, then start offline files synchronization on the old file server. After that, use
Robocopy to copy the date from the old server to the new server. As the offline files cache cannot be recognized by the new file server, so we need to synchronize data first.
If the older server cannot be enabled, as you mentioned, you might need to ask users to copy their changed files to the new file servers.
Regards,
Mandy
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Bam Server migration - need info

Hi All,
SOA 11.1.1.7
I have a question regarding bam server migration. As BAM Server is singleton, I just want to confirm if my understanding is correct.
Example
     - bam_server1 & bam_server2 in BAM_CLUSTER.
     - bam_server1 is configured to be singleton.
Scenario 1 - All 2 Server is up and running in BAM_CLUSTER.
       Request1 goes to bam_server1 which gets processed
       Request2 goes to bam_server2 which internally routes to bam_server1(which is hosting the singleton service)
Scenario 2 - bam_server1(singleton) is killed, only bam_server2 is running
       Request 1 goes to bam_server2 which holds the request as there is no singleton service available.
       Request 2 goes to bam_server2 which is also held without getting processed.
       bam_Server1(singleton) is migrated to new machine and restarted.
       all the request waiting on bam_server2 is routed to bam_server1 which processes the request.
Am i right in saying the request going to bam_server2 will be held and not lost while bam_server1(singleton) is migrated completely.?
Thanks in advance.
/SR

Hi All,
SOA 11.1.1.7
I have a question regarding bam server migration. As BAM Server is singleton, I just want to confirm if my understanding is correct.
Example
     - bam_server1 & bam_server2 in BAM_CLUSTER.
     - bam_server1 is configured to be singleton.
Scenario 1 - All 2 Server is up and running in BAM_CLUSTER.
       Request1 goes to bam_server1 which gets processed
       Request2 goes to bam_server2 which internally routes to bam_server1(which is hosting the singleton service)
Scenario 2 - bam_server1(singleton) is killed, only bam_server2 is running
       Request 1 goes to bam_server2 which holds the request as there is no singleton service available.
       Request 2 goes to bam_server2 which is also held without getting processed.
       bam_Server1(singleton) is migrated to new machine and restarted.
       all the request waiting on bam_server2 is routed to bam_server1 which processes the request.
Am i right in saying the request going to bam_server2 will be held and not lost while bam_server1(singleton) is migrated completely.?
Thanks in advance.
/SR

Whole server migration

Hi,
I am setting up a cluster with two managed serves on different machines. In order to setup whole server migration, do I need to have third machine? In many of the examples i have seen they say when MACHINE1 is down, it can be migrated to MACHINE2..how is this possible if both managed servers listening on the same port? can you please let me know if I need to have third machine? if so, do I need to transfer the domain data via pack and unpack to third machine as well?
Thanks.

Hi
Since your 2 managed servers are on 2 different physical machines, yes, they can share the same port number. Remember they had different host numbers. If they are on same physical machine, naturally you will have 2 different unique port numbers. Now coming to failover, generally for any Cluster Domain, in the front you will have some sort of Load Balancer. The typical example is Apache HTTP Server as Load Balancer. We install and configure apache and edit httpd.conf file to give backend weblogic servers. For example one line could be like this:
ClusterAddress: host1:port1,host2:port2 (Ex: host1:8001,host2:8001). So it is Apache that takes care of Failover and load balancing. If host is dead or server1 on host1 is crashed, apache will remove this server from its internal list (till it is back and up and running. So all next requiests will go to host2:8001.
This has nothing to do with same or diff port numbers. All that matters is, port numbers are unique if servers are on same physical machine.
This means, there is no need for any other 3rd machine.
If your question is something else, please give more details.
Thanks
Ravi Jegga

Exchange 2013 Migration Questions

Exchange 2013 SP1 to a new server. I just realized that I have been asking migration questions on the "general" forum. Here's the deal:
We just want to move to a newer server and reuse the "old" server as a DAG member. We have a production exchange 2013 SP1 server and I found that the DB is not on a RAID'ed drive. So, we purchased a server. I installed 2012 R2 and all windows updates.
Then installed exchange 2013 SP1. Then got our AS/AV software installed. When I boot the new server up and login to ECP, it sees all the exchange users, DB and info. So, I followed:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd876926(v=exchg.150).aspx
to migrate users and current email to the new DB. However, when users logged in their current email was not there. I also tried to use the ECP migration option and this resulted in the same, users old email was not in their inbox. So I had to perform that
same process on the old DB to get users old email back. I then tried to use the migration option in the ECP->same issue. So as of now, we are on the old DB and things are working fine.
According to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997006(v=exchg.65).aspx
When moving from server to server, the DB filename must be the same. The non-production server does not have the same DB filename. Could this be the problem? Could someone point me to documentation on migrating from server to server

So I ran Get-Mailbox -Database “Source Database Name” " -ResultSize Unlimited | New-MoveRequest -TargetDatabase “Target Database Name” and moved all the user mailboxes. Then moved the system mailboxes, public folders and
OAB. Adjusted send connector to reflect new server. Log in as a user, all email is there. Great! Dismount the old DB. Wait a few minutes and user email is still there. Woohoo! Shut down the old exchange server and a few minutes later, all email is gone. Boo!
Boot the old server back up and mount the old DB, all email is back in user inbox. How do I use only the new DB in exchange 2013?
So I just dismounted the old DB and all email stays in users inbox?! So it must be something with the old server that did not get moved over but for the life of me I cant figure out what

Getting ready to migrate, question

I work in a small parochial school and am not adept at server configurations. We have an Intel Xserve running Snow Leopard Server with wikis only for about 3 years and recently purchased a Mac Mini with Snow Leopard server.
I have been tasked (during the school year in a live environment of course) to migrate all of the content from the 10.5 server to the 10.6. Once I fire up the new server and assign it the same public IP address as my 10.5 server, I'll disconnect the 10.5 from the network and migrate.
My question is: if this fails in any way, can I simply plug the 10.5 server back in and everything will be back to normal?

Hopefully not too late for an answer, but yes, if the new server didn't (for instance) accept any email, or collect any web data, then from the point of view of the old server, it was just powered off for a few hours, and it'll pick up where it left off.
Server Migration should do this for you in a couple of hours...

Iprint migration question

We had to back out of a migration last week because of issues with edir version on Netware. I've updated that and TSA, but another question just came up. I'm migrating iPrint from a cluster, plus doing transfer ID. If I choose cluster resource on the source server in miggui, I only get the consolidate option. Does that mean I need to first run a consolidation job just for iprint and then go back and run the transfer ID? Or will the consolidation screw up a transfer ID?

$(UService migrations based on cluster resources and Transfer ID are separated in Migration Tools (miggui). You need to execute Cluster based iPrint migration in one project and Transfer ID migration in another project.
Perform all service consolidation migrations and make sure they are all completed/synced and working before attempting Transfer ID.
>>>
From:
zenking<[email protected]>
To:
novell.support.open-enterprise-server.migration
Date:
07/22/2010 02:26 AM
Subject:
iprint migration question
We had to back out of a migration last week because of issues with edir
version on Netware. I've updated that and TSA, but another question just
came up. I'm migrating iPrint from a cluster, plus doing transfer ID.
If I choose cluster resource on the source server in miggui, I only get
the consolidate option. Does that mean I need to first run a
consolidation job just for iprint and then go back and run the transfer
ID? Or will the consolidation screw up a transfer ID?
zenking
zenking's Profile: http://forums.novell.com/member.php?userid=2813
View this thread: http://forums.novell.com/showthread.php?t=416302

Analysis Authorization Migration Question

Analysis Authorization Migration Question
This is detail Question
1) I am testing Analysis Authorization Migration in NW2004s SP9 and have applied all OSS notes that are relevant to SP09 and are coming in SP10.
2) We have 2 Info object flagged as Authorization relevant 0COMP_CODE and 0COSTCENTER
3) We have Object level security set-up in BW 3.x system and for a role we have specified values like 0COMP_CODE has value 1000, 1800. :. In the same role we have specified 0COSTCENTER value 130001 to 180001, : and hierarchy node.
4) When we migrate to Analysis Authorizations, using RSEC_MIGRATION, this program creates 2 Authorizations ZCOCODE00 & ZCOSTCTRH00. Both of them have 0COMP_CODE and 0COST_CENTER Objects.
5) ZCOCODE00 authorization gets value 0COMP_CODE values 1000, 1800. : and 0COSTCENTER Value :.
6) On the same line ZCOSTCTRH00 gets value 130001 to 180001, : and 0COMP_CODE :.
1st Question:
1) Why does it create 2 Authorizations?
2) During Checking it does not pass the authorizations, because it seems to me that it fails in Optimization process.
3) I manually merge the authorizations in ONE object then authorization check passes. In other word if I combine ZCOSTCTRH00 & ZCOCODE00 then Query authorization check passes.
Any one is struggling on this.
Please note, I am doing Migration so that it updates existing Profiles (Roles now from SP9).
Any comments will be very help full.
Pankaj Gupta

Hello Pankaj
There are some basic misunderstandings on your side.
Let me try to clarify:
First we should distinguish between migration of authorizations and of what a query does with them.
You had 2 auth objects before migration (in 3.x).
Of course, they must be migrated to 2 new analysis auths.
There is no general possibility to combine authorizations to a single one as the may appear in different roles and users. Moreover this would kill performance and finally, nobody would recognize the origin.
Only in very restricted cases one could think of a combination of auths which come out of migration. But, then people loose overview about what goes on.
Before the corrections in note "Migration IV" the : had not been inserted but now it is for good reasons.
Now, accept for the moment that you receive 2 auths.
Then, you cannnot (must not) combine the 2 resulting authorizations!
Authorization 1
COMP_CODE : 1000, 1300, :
Cost Center : :
Authorizations 2
Comp_Code :
Cost Center : 3100001-31999999; : plus a Hierarchy Node.
This means that e.g. combination
COMP_CODE 1000
COST_CENTER 3100001-31999999
is not allowed!!! Therefore, they must not be combined!
Also, the query and its optimization is comepletely independent of the migration. And here, during query run time the auths cannot be combined. It is no failure!
Moreover, the merging optimization is just a performance optimizaiton and has nothing to do with whether the query result is authorized or not.
If you combine them manually you have authorized different combinations.
Well, now you may wonder why you get 2 auths at all which leads to a "no auth" result in the query execution.
The reason is, that in 3.x where you got a result with your 2 auth objects the modeling was wrong.
If you want to authorize any combination of characteristic values, you should combine these characteritics together in one auth object, not in 2!
(In BI7.0 it works like that but not in 3.x)
But you defined 2 which may be valid even in several other InfoProviders independently and not even at the same time. Moreover, the auth objects may come from different roles and may be assigend to different users which then have completely different auth content. In general it is not possible to combine different auth objects or to find out those special situations which nevertheless allow for such optimizations. If you re-do a migration with more objects and users you could even receive different results which is also not satisfying.
Therefore, instead, the mechanism was introduced to insert a : auth to those characteristics that are auth relevant (and checked now with 7.0) but not in the currently processed auth object.
In you special case it may have made sense to combine them but not in general. And a migration can only try to work as general as possible.
For your application you may combine the 2 auths manually if you want to allow also the crossover combinations
COMP_CODE 1000
COST_CENTER 3100001-31999999
Best regards
Peter John
BI Development

BW Steps before and after R3 server migration

Hi Friends,
We are using ECC6 and BW 3.5.
My client is going for R3 server migration, yes it's just a migration of server and not any upgrade. This server is quite old so migrating to a higher end server.
BASIS will do a system copy during downtime i.e. a homogeneous client copy where they would just copy the DB tables. As per them all data will remain same and only the IP will change i.e. i will have to make a change in R3-BW RFC connection.
I need to know what other pre and post migration steps are involved in this case?
Thanks,
BJ

Hi,
I dont think that there would be any impact on queues etc due to server migration. We flush out data from queues only in cases of upgrade/ patch application etc. because there is a chance that after the upgrade the structure of datasource may change. In that case, any data lying in queue beforehand would get corrupted and cannot be loaded.
in your case, there is no such change going to happen, therefore no need to worry about queues. You can go ahead without worrying about any dataloss due to queues.

Calendar Server Migration from iplanet5.2 to Sunjava messaging server

Hi
Can any one help me on Calendar server migration.
How can i migrate the calendar server from iplanet 5.2 to sunjava messaging server
Users
Calendar resources
Groups
Attributes

Hi,
I assume you mean iplanet calendar server 5.1.1 to the latest calendar server (6.3). If so, I suggest you start by reading through the calendar server admin guide which goes through the steps involved and tools to use to migrate from 5.1.1 onto calendar server 6.3.
http://www.sun.com/bigadmin/hubs/comms/library/manuals.calendar.jsp
Regards,
Shane.

10.3 Whole Server Migration

Hi,
I need some enlightenments from all. Here is my setup (in Windows 2003 R2)
2 physical Server, PS A, PS B (PS: physical server)
PS A contains, 1 Admin Server, 1 Managed server
PS B contains, 1 Managed Server
I've done the necessary clustering setup and tested its working, using node manager (nmenroll, conseus, etc). now what I'm trying to perform is to try out whole sever migration.
I've found out the script, wlsifconfig.cmd (found under %wls_home%\user_projects\domains\abc\bin\server_migration\, contains some linux command such as grep and rm. Workaround installed grep command for windows and replace rm with del.
I've shut down all managed servers and configure the managed servers to be whole server migration ready, set the node manager properties etc. I start the managed server 1 in PS A, PS A contains the floating IP upon starting. I checked using ipconfig, the floating IP is added. Then I tried to start managed server 2 through the admin console in PS A. Here comes the problem, managed server 2 also add in the floating IP which resulted in windows IP conflict. I'm not sure what went wrong, as of now i suspect is the wlsifconfig.cmd is the root of the problem. Therefore writing in to ask help from all. (Could it be im using 10.3 which does not support whole server migration?)
Best Regards

This appears to be working on Windows using 10.0.3 Server. For the lack of step-by-step tutorial, my best suggestion is to read Node Manager Administrator's Guide chapter 1,2,3,4,6 and "Using Clusters" chapter 7. I ran into many error messages and had to apply several hacks from google results.
The whole server migration design does not appear to be too useful though.
I have the whole server migration configured on two hosts.
1. Machine A has AdminServer and M1 (runs a pinned application and happens to be assigned a cluster master)
2. Machine B has node manager and M2.
3. M1 is set up to be migratable to A and B
I shutdown Machine A, but nothing is migrated. From the document, it seems both cluster master and AdminServer need to be running in order for migration to happen. This is still a single point of failure.

BAM Cluster setup - issue with whole server migration configuration

HI,
We are working on a SOA , BAM , BPM Cluster setup on OEL VMs
With Admin server running on Host1 and Soa_server1, BAM_server1 , Host2 - Soa_server2 , Bam_server2.
We were successfully able to setup clustering for Soa without using the webTier utilities in our environment, Just by adding entries in the /etc/hosts file.
Followed the document - except for web tier setup
http://www.namredlek.nl/orasoa/InstallSOASuite11gOnCluster_v1.pdf
1)     Installed Weblogic 11g.
2)     Soa 11g.
3)     Domain creation
4) Configured Node manager
5) Soa Clustering completed successfully.
6) Domain up and running with SOA_Cluster up and running.
7)     Extended the domain with BAM
The issue revolves when we are doing teh Migration configurations from the console for BAM and we restart BAM server we get an error -
Apr 14, 2011 2:30:35 AM weblogic.nodemanager.server.Handler handleStart
WARNING: Exception while starting server 'bam_server1'
java.io.IOException: Command '/oracle/Shared_MWHome/user_projects/domains/SOA_Domain/bin/server_migration/wlsifconfig.sh -addif eth0 192.168.1.6 255.255.255.0 ' returned an unsuccessful exit code '1'. Check NM logs for script output.
and Bam server goes to Failed Not Restartable state.

The error is clearly out there
java.io.IOException: Command '/oracle/Shared_MWHome/user_projects/domains/SOA_Domain/bin/server_migration/wlsifconfig.sh -addif eth0 192.168.1.6 255.255.255.0 ' returned an unsuccessful exit code '1'. Check NM logs for script output.
This error occurs due to a failure in adding the virtual IP of BAM server to the network interface you have specified in nodemanager.properties.
You need to check whether you have specified the correct interface and subnet mask in node manager.properties as below :
The fourth step is to edit the Node Manager's properties file. This file is called nodemanager.properties
and is located in the ORACLE_BASE/product/osbmw/wlserver_10.3/common/nodemanager directory.
For server migration to work properly, you need to add the properties listed below:
Interface=eth0
NetMask=255.255.255.0
UseMACBroadcast=true
· Interface
This property specifies the interface name for the floating IP (for example, eth0).
· NetMask
This property specifies the net mask for the interface for the floating IP. The net mask should the
same as the net mask on the interface; 255.255.255.0 is used as an example in this document.
· UseMACBroadcast
This property specifies whether or not to use a node's MAC address when sending ARP packets,
that is, whether or not to use the -b flag in the arping command.

Server migration questions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for