Service contracts & document types

Can anyone provide insight on how to setup document types using P40040 for service contracts. For amortization of fixed price contracts, are you using service contracts

Hi
please check this in path
Spro-Financial accounting-Financial accounting globe setting-tax on sales or on purchase-Basic Setting-Check calculation procedure-Define Procedure
Here check taxinn procedure you have define use stander TAXINN or create ZTAXINN
and check which condition has define there, analysis that which goes to g/l account and which goes to inventory
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Similar Messages

Billing Request in Value Contract Document Type

Dear Friends
In Value Contract Document Type WK1 in [VOV8] Billing Request is IRC:- Debit Memo Request for Contract
What is the use of it how i will see it is effect in standard business process
Regards
Arun

The billing request is your call off sales document for the value contract e.g. USD 2,000 contract for which initially only USD 500 is billed, thus the debit memo request. The process applies to a situtaion where there is/are partial or staggered releases of contracted goods or services.

You cannot view this document (Contract Document Type)

Hello!
I have a problem a with a Workflow Definition because I appear the following Error in the log (Setup > System Administration > System Management > System Information > Logs)
u201CYou cannot view this document (Contract Document Type) because you do not have the appropriate permission. Contact the system administrator and request permission.u201D
This happens when I change the status of a Draft to Draft Review. specifically, within the prescript code occurs when you run the line of code:
typeBean = typeHome.find(doc.getDocTypeReference());
The Prescript code within XPDL it is the next:
import com.frictionless.api.common.exception.*;
import com.frictionless.api.common.log.Logger;
import com.frictionless.api.common.platform.*;
import com.frictionless.api.common.types.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doc.collaboration.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doccommon.masterdata.*;
import com.frictionless.api.ibean.*;
import com.frictionless.api.util.*;
import com.frictionless.api.workflow.*;
import com.frictionless.api.projects.*;
import com.frictionless.api.common.log.*;
import com.frictionless.api.ibean.*;
import com.frictionless.api.usermgmt.masterdata.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doc.collaboration.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doccommon.doc.contract.*;logMsg = Logger.createLogMessage(session);
logMsg.setLogMessage("KCSM ENG Signal Material - Draft Review");
Logger.info(logMsg);
typeHome = IBeanHomeLocator.lookup(session, doc.getDocTypeReference());
typeBean = typeHome.find(doc.getDocTypeReference()); // here appear the error.
u2026
Can you help because this error and above all how to solve
thanks

Hello!
I have a problem a with a Workflow Definition because I appear the following Error in the log (Setup > System Administration > System Management > System Information > Logs)
u201CYou cannot view this document (Contract Document Type) because you do not have the appropriate permission. Contact the system administrator and request permission.u201D
This happens when I change the status of a Draft to Draft Review. specifically, within the prescript code occurs when you run the line of code:
typeBean = typeHome.find(doc.getDocTypeReference());
The Prescript code within XPDL it is the next:
import com.frictionless.api.common.exception.*;
import com.frictionless.api.common.log.Logger;
import com.frictionless.api.common.platform.*;
import com.frictionless.api.common.types.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doc.collaboration.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doccommon.masterdata.*;
import com.frictionless.api.ibean.*;
import com.frictionless.api.util.*;
import com.frictionless.api.workflow.*;
import com.frictionless.api.projects.*;
import com.frictionless.api.common.log.*;
import com.frictionless.api.ibean.*;
import com.frictionless.api.usermgmt.masterdata.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doc.collaboration.*;
import com.frictionless.api.doccommon.doc.contract.*;logMsg = Logger.createLogMessage(session);
logMsg.setLogMessage("KCSM ENG Signal Material - Draft Review");
Logger.info(logMsg);
typeHome = IBeanHomeLocator.lookup(session, doc.getDocTypeReference());
typeBean = typeHome.find(doc.getDocTypeReference()); // here appear the error.
u2026
Can you help because this error and above all how to solve
thanks

Method to get contract document type in prephase

Hi All,
Which method can be used to get contract document type in prephase change script?
How to find these methods?
Regards,
Prabhat

Hi
getDocTypeReference() will get you the reference type of contract doc. Use this reference ID to locate the Home API and find the contract type using findUniqueReferenceByName()
Regards
Mudit Saini

In ME51N screen service requisition document type is not comming

Hi gurus,
Can anybody help me out ,In production server in me51n ie purchase requisition screen, where we used to select the different purchase requisition order types ,service order is not comming whereas in development server it is comming.In spro i have seen the settings ,in document type service order item category is attached.
Please help me its urgent.
Thanks N Regards,
Siddhartha Chatterjee

if that document type is not even coming in the spro settings for the production server then i belive it has not been trasported to the production server and that means there has been some intentions to do that so its beeter to make sure that do u really need that document type or not if u need it then try to transport it from qc

Purchase condition based on Contract document type

Dear Gurus,
We have created a seperate documents for Domestic and Import Contracts. We want to trigger Domestic Pricing condition in Domestic Contract, and vise verse... We want only the domestic condition to apprear in the dropdown when the purchase team is creating a domestic contract. Does Condition sequencing provide any means to achive this?
Waiting for a reply.
Regards
VPV

>
VIKAT verlekar wrote:
> Dear Gurus,
>
> We have created a seperate documents for Domestic and Import Contracts. We want to trigger Domestic Pricing condition in Domestic Contract, and vise verse... We want only the domestic condition to apprear in the dropdown when the purchase team is creating a domestic contract. Does Condition sequencing provide any means to achive this?
>
> Waiting for a reply.
>
> Regards
>
> VPV
Separate calculation schema are created for both domestic and import and they are attached to vendor. When vendor is inputted in the contract, vendor is the determining factor of which calculation schema it should bring as attached in the vendor. So only conditions attached with vendor will be bought once vendor is entered in contract. It can be either local or import.

Proforma invoice for Service Contracts

Hello,
I know the invoice types F5 for order related proforma and F8 for delivery related invoice. Now I'm looking for possibilities to create a proforma invoice based on a Service contract (Order Type WV) as a periodical invoiced sales order.
I tried to use proforma invoice (type F5) with Service contract but the billing plan will be set on status C (completely processed) so that the same period can not be invoiced again with the real commercial invoice. The billing status in the sales order has been changed as well with the proforma, which should not be the case as the proforma should just generate a printout.
Does SAP offer anything or how can I setup customizing to be able to create proforma for periodical sales orders?
Kind regards
Rafael

Hello,
Thank's for the information.
Finally I tried to copy our existing invoice type and set it up like F5 but the problem is still that the billing plan periods are set to status C - completely processed. The accounting side is OK as no accounting document is being created.
But with this billing plan situation it would not be possible to create first the proforma invoice for one Period and then later create the real commercial invoice for the same period.
Any ideas what I can setup to avoid this problem? I thought of chancelling the proforma after creation so that the billing period will be opened again, but this is no user friendly or professional solution.
Thank's in advance for your ideas.
Kind regards
Rafael

Installed bases and service contracts

Hi,
Is it possible that:
1. There are multiple installed bases from the same customer being covered in a SINGLE service contract document (i,e, referencing mulitple I-base objects) for the same type of service.
Example : 100 installations for the same customer being covered for the 3 free services per year through a SINGLE contract document
2. Is there a functionality where by all the installed bases for a given customer can be seen location wise under a single tree structure ?
Thanks,
Dhaval.

Hi Dhaval,
It is possible to do this.
1. You could add all the objects under the object list assignment block in the contract item. So, here you specify that the service item is available as part of the contract for a set of objects.
2. In this case, you could create the customer's installed base as the root and add all the installed bases under that customer in a hierarchy, while maintaining the Ibase master data. Else, you could search for Installed Base using the search criteria "Header Using Partner Data". But, this does not show a single tree structure.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Shwetha

Problem reading service contract from ibase

Hi Experts,
I am required to read the service contract document from the Ibase component.
I am unable to find the table or function module to read the service contract
when i pass Ibase value.
I am using the badi CRM_SERVICE_CONTRACT and i an required to read the contract here
based on my way of selection and not using the standard selection.
Pls provide ur valuable guidance...
Thanks,
SA

Hi Gert,
I am getting short dump when i have updated the value inside tht badi for the hader and the item guid of the contract.
When i try to enter the hard coded values it accepted, but whn i pick the value through function module or through the select query and palciong inthe table,its giving me short dump.
I hope you can guide me to solve this serious issue,a little urgent.
Thanks,
SA
Edited by: Saurabh Agrawal on Nov 27, 2008 1:01 PM

In PO document type ??

hii
In PO document type creating , what is significance and use of below tick boxes .
Indicator:No Account assignment.?
Indicator: Contract release order/SA delivery schedule.?
Indicator: Contract release order/SA delivery schedule.?
Explain me with some example .
Thanks

Hi
I think you are asking fields which are linkage requisition
1) Specifies that a purchase order item must not contain an account
assignment. It means when that PR is converted to PO with this document type it should not have account assignment. Or it will give error.
2) Indicates whether release orders/releases or delivery schedules are possible in purchasing documents such as contracts or scheduling agreements. Normally there are used in Scheduling agreement document type or contract document type. In PO it does not make any difference
Regards
Antony

BOM IN CRM Only for Service Contract

Hello
We want have a BOM explosion working in CRM for service contracts
Here are the details :
We have replicated the materials from ECC to CRM. We are not maintaining any BOMu2019s in ECC.
The idea is that we maintain the BOM Structure in CRM only, as we donu2019t want to have the Items as a billable item in a position, only for information purposes (or later on for metering)
We have maintained the product category for the header product in CRM so we are able to maintain depended components
(Relationship type SCDEC S Dependent Components (DC) )
Not we are able to assign dependent component to the header material
Item category groups:
We understand that the standard item category groups that should be used are ERLA for the header product and LUMF for the Item product.
In order to support the same functionality for the given item category group , maintained at the product level in ECC we copied the same setting for the item category group from the standard to
our settings.
Standart
Tx type     Item Cat Group          item category     structure scope
TA             ERLA                TAQ           A single level Explosion of Structured Product
TA         LUMF                TAP                   A single level Explosion of Structured Product
So we have copied TAQ to ZTAQ and TAP to ZTAP.
ZS01 is a copy of SC (service contract)
Tx type     Item Cat Group          item category     structure scope
ZS01     ZLEI                       ZTAQ          A single level Explosion of Structured Product
ZS01     LEIS                       ZTAP          A single level Explosion of Structured Product
But when we use a header product in the service contract, we cannot see the BOM is exploding.
We have also created some products in CRM with exactly the same Item Category groups as the standard and when we create a standard order (TA) in CRM, the BOM is NOT exploding.
Questions:
Is it possible to have the BOM setup only in CRM, like we try to do it?
Is it possible to use our own item category groups in CRM more is the functionality only working with ERLA and LUMF?
Is it possible to use the BOM Explosion in Service contracts as well ?
What steps are we missing to get the BOM explosion in CRM ?
Thank you for your help
Frank
Edited by: Frank Foerstner Foerstner on Dec 9, 2011 12:34 PM

Thanks Nablan, I could do that for multiple header coming in file. But I have a question for you on BAdI ALM_ME_006_GOODSMVT. I have implemented this BAdI , and this BAdI is called by a function Module ALM_MEREP_006_CREATE. When I test this FM giving the Material , Orderid and Movement type entries, this BAdI is triggered when giving a breakpoint. I've given this code for changing the movement type to 961. Cause the stanadrd scenario does not maintain Movement type 961 in Mobile Asset Management. The Movement type 961 for unplanned Materials comes to SAP and changes to 261 as maiantained by TCOKO table. To bypass this & retain the movement type 961 in SAP I'm using this BAdI. Currently this is what I'm doing and am stuck in the method interface how do I call the method.
method IF_EX_ALM_ME_006_GOODSMVT~CREATE .
break-point.
*DATA : i_ce_goodsmovement TYPE REFERENCE
          ALM_ME_CUSTOMER_ENHANCEMENT.
DATA : lr_badi_goods_movement TYPE REF TO if_ex_alm_me_006_goodsmvt.
DATA : ls_user_data TYPE ALM_ME_USER_DATA-USERID.
*DATA : goods_movement TYPE ALM_ME_MATERIAL_MOVEMENT.
CALL METHOD lr_badi_goods_movement->create
EXPORTING
       ce_goodsmovement = ce_goodsmovement
IMPORTING
       user_data        = ls_user_data
       custom_user_data = ls_ce_user_data
       goods_movement   = goods_movement
changing
       return           = return[].
CALL FUNCTION 'ALM_ME_COMMIT_OR_ROLLBACK'
       TABLES
            return = return.
endmethod.
Please help me to get the data in this method. How do I call this.

BOM explosion in CRM Service Contract

Hello
We want have a BOM explosion working in CRM for service contracts
Here are the details :
We have replicated the materials from ECC to CRM. We are not maintaining any BOMu2019s in ECC.
The idea is that we maintain the BOM Structure in CRM only, as we donu2019t want to have the Items as a billable item in a position, only for information purposes (or later on for metering)
We have maintained the product category for the header product in CRM so we are able to maintain depended components
(Relationship type SCDEC S Dependent Components (DC) )
Not we are able to assign dependent component to the header material
Item category groups:
We understand that the standard item category groups that should be used are ERLA for the header product and LUMF for the Item product.
In order to support the same functionality for the given item category group , maintained at the product level in ECC we copied the same setting for the item category group from the standard to
our settings.
Standart
Tx type Item Cat Group item category structure scope
TA ERLA TAQ A single level Explosion of Structured Product
TA LUMF TAP A single level Explosion of Structured Product
So we have copied TAQ to ZTAQ and TAP to ZTAP.
ZS01 is a copy of SC (service contract)
Tx type Item Cat Group item category structure scope
ZS01 ZLEI ZTAQ A single level Explosion of Structured Product
ZS01 LEIS ZTAP A single level Explosion of Structured Product
But when we use a header product in the service contract, we cannot see the BOM is exploding.
We have also created some products in CRM with exactly the same Item Category groups as the standard and when we create a standard order (TA) in CRM, the BOM is NOT exploding.
Questions:
Is it possible to have the BOM setup only in CRM, like we try to do it?
Is it possible to use our own item category groups in CRM more is the functionality only working with ERLA and LUMF?
Is it possible to use the BOM Explosion in Service contracts as well ?
What steps are we missing to get the BOM explosion in CRM ?
Thank you for your help
Frank

Hi,
I did work on single level BOM explosion in a couple of projects. As per SAP note 549341 - FAQ: BOMs in the sales order, it is very much possible to explode multi-level BOMs.
Check this note and item category BOM explosion options.
<b>Do not forget to reward if it helps,</b>
Regards,
Paul Kondaveeti

参照Service Contract, 创建Follow-up Service Contract

参照Service Contract (BUS2000112) ，创建Follow-up Service Contract (BUS2000112)这个功能在标准功能里是没有的。例如：一个service contract quotation 其实也是一个service contract，它的 business object type 是BUS2000112，
那你如果点击 follow up button 去查找service contract transaction type，那你是找不到这个 service contract transaction type的。
这个是由于 FM CRM_UBB_FILTER_SUC_PROC_TYPE的hard coding决定的。大家可以查看一下这个 FM 里边的remark
Between UBB contracts and/or quotations followups
should only be created using the specific actions (e.g. COA)
or change processes, but not using "normal" followups. So
this transaction types have to be hidden on the UI for the
followups although the copy control customizing allows it
With 7.0 this is also true for regular service contracts
下边我也把两个可能的解决方案提供给大家，
1 - you can either modify FM CRM_UBB_FILTER_SUC_PROC_TYPE in line 49. You
can comment out the following line:
delete ct_suc_proc_type where process_type =
ls_suc_proc_type-process_type.
2- As you have already observed:
you can also make use of the standard process provided by SAP using
the Accept button in the service contract quotation. Please refer to SAP
help available with folling link:
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/en/46/49adcf62096a81e10000000a155369/frameset.htm|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/en/46/49adcf62096a81e10000000a155369/frameset.htm]
谢谢。
昭杰
Edited by: Zhaojie Liu on May 5, 2010 9:34 AM
Edited by: Zhaojie Liu on May 5, 2010 9:36 AM

嗯，读读同事的经验真的很有帮助，顺便上系统测试了一把，发现现在最新的版本可能还有一些新的变化，就是有条件的支持为服务合同或者报价单创建后续服务合同或者报价单，请感兴趣的朋友参考note 1405171，里面有比较详细的前提条件描述，和相关的coding。
这里似乎还提到了一个ubb的概念，估计应该是usage base billing，如果说错了请多多包含，谢谢。
Hongyan

Mass Update Contract Documents through workbook?

HI Experts,
Is it possible to mass update Contract documents through Workbook? if yes please proivde the workbook.
Thanks
Kushagra A

HI Kushagra
Please use the below mention fields to update the current Contract Document. you can use an CSV file to upload this.
see the attachment.
# Field name:
# Unique Agreement Name : This is the agreement's unique name to identify the agreement.
# Agreement Class ID : This is the agreement's class ID. It is '1004' for Master Agreement and '1003' for Sub-Agreement.
# Agreement Display Name : This is the agreement's display name.
# Attachment Name : This is the attachment's display name.
# Attachment Order Code : This is the attachment's order code to locate the attachment collected by the agreement.
# Attachment Size (KB) : This is the attachment's size in KB.
# Attachment Visibility : This is the attachment's visibility. Either Buyside only or Buyside and Sellside.
# Added by : This field indicates who added this attachment.
# Contract Document (Y/N?) : Please enter this field with either 'Y' or 'N' to indicate if you want to convert this attachment to a contract document.
# Contract Document Type: Please enter this field with the display name of the contract document type. Check the Setup->Contract Document Type for available choices.
# Contract Document Phase External ID: enter this field with the External ID of the contract document phase. The phase should be defined in the phase configuration of your contract document type.
Let me know if this helps
Thanks
Kanchan

Lead as Follow up document from Service Contract

Hi Experts,
There is a requirement to create Service Lead from Service Contract. I dont think there is something different by name Service Lead so i assume it is Standard Lead which is present in system.
I maintained the copy control for Tx. Types and as well as for Item Categories.
Issue:
If i create a Service Contract and create a follow up Lead with no items, it works fine.
Suppose i use an item (sales/service item), and i try to create a follow up Lead, the resulting pop-up to choose items from preceding document shows and error and the item doesnot get coped and displays an error, 'Sold-to-Party is not eligible for contract items'.
Has anyone come across this issue?
Thanks and Regards,
MG

Hi Maggii,
1. Is it possible to create a Lead from Service Contract? Does the system allow it even after maintaining relevant copy control configurations?
A.Yes, it is possible while arranging of copy controls for transactions need to activate u201CCopy Item numberu201D.
2.What does the error message, 'Sold to party not eligible for contract items' mean....have u ever seen such error?
A. Means, the particular sold to party is not maintained for that contract (for trail check with any maintained sold to party for that error message), cross check the contract again under in partner functions.
If it is suits to your requirement please some reward points,
Thanks,
Suuny.

Service contracts & document types

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for