Service entry amount is greater than PO amount
Hi all,
This is an example of the issue:
Service PO created with quantity 1 and price 1000.00. PO amount 1000.00
Service entry entered , quantity 1, amount 1000.00. GR amount 1000.00
Then PO changed, qty is 1000 and price 1. PO amount 1000.00
another Service entry is entered, quantity 999, amount 999.00. GR amount 999.00
After these 2 service entries, the PO quantity is 1000, price 1, PO amount 1000.00 and service entry amount of 1999.00
The invoices are received and no blocked for payment.
Any idea of what to do?
Regards,
CD
Hi,
Message M8 -081( for quantities invoiced greater than goods receipt quantity) is set as E (error) in OMRM & OBMSG t.codes.
Please check again in your system,1st try in sandbox,then do in DEV client & transport TR and then test in testing client.
Also try setting error messages for SE-363 & SE-781 in following path:
SPRO- >Material Management->External Services Management->Define Attributes of System Messages
After check & setting all, go for fresh transactions.
Regards,
Biju K
Similar Messages
-
Payment Amount is greater than invoice amount in sales order
Hi experts:
I have a Sales order that contained originally 3 lines of which the first 2 lines was delivered totally and the third was delivered partially.
The client decided to change the remaining quantity for another reference so the procedure in the sales order was to add another line and try to close the third line by right click and "close row" but the option is not available because there is a partial delivery, so the option was to update the inicial quantity in the third line at the same as delivered and update.
Like a result a I could close the third line and leave a fourth line available to delivery, however when I open this Sales order again an try to update a message "payment amount is greater than invoice amount" and appears inmediately the "Deposit on Order" window.
Other Information: The quantities delivered was invoiced but no payment has been received.
Checking in the SCN I have not found some related information with this case because the existing answers are related with incomming and outgoing payments but like I mentioned before this docuements already have not payments.
In relation with the decimal places, my original decimal places configuration was 2 and it was updated to 3, issue that neither is mentioned in previous answers.
I will appreciate your help,
Thanks,
ManuelHi Manuel,
Your case is complicated by the fact you have not only undated the Sales Order which is partially delivered but also updated decimal places during the process. In this case, you are probably the best person to figure out what is the system expected number. You may restore your production db to test environment first. Then do whatever you could to fix the problem. If no solution can be found, you have to log a message to SAP support.
A general advice: do not fight with system for what you think system should accept.
Thanks,
Gordon -
Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error
Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing incoming payment
regards
kavitha SHi Kavitha,
please check in the OINV table the balance due on the invoice. This amount has to match the payment. If the problem is due to different decimal places & you are using a version lower than 2007 you will be able to change the decimal places for this particular payment. If you are using 2007, you will no longer be able to reduce the number of decimal places. In that case you could check out SAP note 1321183 & verify with your accountant that the workaround may be used.
All the best,
Kerstin -
Payment amount is greater than invoice amount error when doing AR CN
Dear Experts,
I am trying to post an AR CN on an AR Downpayment Invoice. This AR Downpayment Invoice has not been applied to its invoice yet, status is hence OPEN.
I now go to AR CN and use Copy From function to browse for this AR Downpayment Invoice, when I try to post this Credit Note, I receive the below error:
"Payment amount is greater than invoice amount [Message 439-4]"
Any advice?
Much thanks in advance!
Warmest Regards,
ChinhoYou may check SAP note 1025708, 979611 and this thread:
Payment amount is greater than invoice amount
Thanks,
Gordon -
Prepayment amount is greater than invoice amount, what to do
Hi all
I am using GL, AP and CE. the problem is as follows:
I register a lot of prepayments for my employees. When i give a prepayment to one employee, he brings me back the invoice and than i register the invoice and then apply this prepayment to this invoice. But most of the cases the amount in the prepayment is bigger than the amount of the invoice. The employee is bringing me back the invoice and some money. Now what i should register on the system to reflect the money back. The system does not allow to apply prepayments on debit/credit memo. If i register a credit memo, the next time i register an invoice for a supplier which it has some value from the prepayment the system is suggesting this prepayment, but this is wrong because i have registered a document for this amount of money(which is credit memo).
Please advice because the customer is asking and i do not have any answer yet.
Thank you and Best RegardsWhat version of EBS are you on? My comments below apply to EBS 11.
As Vinip noted, you can have a distribution line that debits the cash account.
Another possibility would be to record a standard invoice for the entire amount, with the refund amount debited to some clearing account, and apply the prepayment to that invoice. Then in accounts receivable, record a miscellaneous cash receipt against the clearing account. Not a real good solution, as involves two different applications.
So I think the way to go is to appy a debit for the refund amount to your cash account when recording the invoice to apply the prepayment to. Makes sense?
If you want a simpler way, then submit an enhancement request to okay.
Perhaps for this company, it is common to give employees money in advance to buy something, but this is I think very rare for the corporate world at large. Usually the employee buys something and then submits an expense report to get reimbursed after the fact. Or the employees use a company credit card to make the purchase. Maybe your company needs to look at changing its current process? Just something to think about.
John Dickey -
F-32 Partial payment amount greater than net amount
Hi Experts,
We have recently a problem in clearing up payments in F-32. When we double-click the item under Partial Payment Tab, the warning message displays "Partial payment amount greater than net amount" then the value in the Payment Amount Column becomes negative. The users need to activate 2 separate entries for partial payment but instead of . How can we do this?
We have to post like this in partial payment under same customer:
20090820 1400005790 DZ 19 20.08.2009 20.08.2009 5,000.00- 1,295.12
20110225 1400010330 DZ 19 25.02.2011 25.02.2011 2,000.00- 1,295.12-
So the the Assigned Value should be zero to post.Thanks @Atif. Ok so now I understand that the "Total Difference Posting" amount inf-32 will create the new amount of the residual payment with Document Type AB.
Now with the Warning Message "Partial Payment Amount greater than the net amount", this is in a overpayment amount that is reflected in transaction F-32, here are the entries:
Assignment Doc Num Doc Type Post Key Net Amt Partially Paid Amt Payment Amt
2133004220 90005448 RV 01 3,707.02 3,305.71 401.31
2133015007 90020098 RV 01 7,836.68 6,737.25 1,099.43
2133016757 90022362 RV 01 10,521.31 8,603.87 1,917.44
2133137046 90187172 RV 01 11,367.68 0.00 11,367.68
2133137047 90187173 RV 01 1,354.09 0.00 1,354.09
2133137048 90187174 RV 01 1,739.82 0.00 1,739.82
2133137049 90187175 RV 01 994.57 0.00 994.57
20110419 90187176 RV 01 6.42 0.00 6.42
20110421 90187177 RV 01 44.94 0.00 44.94
20110425 90187178 RV 01 19.26 0.00 19.26
20081216 1400003657 DZ 19 3,421.86- 3,394.04- 27.82-
20081222 1400003706 DZ 19 1,000.00- 1,033.17- 33.17-
20090310 1400004396 DZ 19 420.51- 401.25- 19.26-
20090630 1400005319 DZ 19 786.13- 705.94- 80.19-
20090702 1400005349 DZ 19 596.04- 535.88- 60.16-
20090820 1400005790 DZ 19 5,000.00- 6,295.12- 1,295.12-
20090824 1400005827 DZ 19 308.16- 295.32- 12.84-
20091027 1400006377 DZ 19 400.72- 375.04- 25.68-
20091215 1400006796 DZ 19 349.89- 337.05- 12.84-
20100608 1400008253 DZ 19 200.09- 189.39- 10.70-
20101019 1400009279 DZ 19 165.85- 155.00- 10.85-
20101019 1400009280 DZ 19 254.65- 238.00- 16.65-
20101019 1400009281 DZ 19 160.64- 157.00- 3.64-
20101130 1400009595 DZ 19 10,000.00- 5,440.92- 4,559.08-
How is this possible that Document numbers 1400003706 and 1400005790 has overpaid amount. And both of them are downpayment documents? Is there any way I can clear them with the Invoices, I am also lost with this kind of scenario? -
Payment amount greater than net amount!
Payment amount greater than net amount! , i am receiving this error while doing partial payment.. plz help
Also reversed documents are not coming in partial payment tab in F-53 but it is showing as a open item in vendor balance...../hi,
First of all Check ur Clearig GL i.e Bank /Cash in that Relevant to cash Flow is ticked or not.If not ticked then tick it and then try again.
thanks
deepa -
PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount
Dear all,
I have an issue in Production while doing J1IEX....
While capturing of Part 2 value in J1IEX, the system gives the following issue..."PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount"
Kindly any one give the solution.....
thanks and regards,
Mohan.MClosed.
We should not give greater than date of MIGO. We should give MIGO transaction date. -
Block Invoice amount greater than PO amount
Dear Expert,
Currently, I set a tolerance (incoming invoice--> define vendor-specific tolerance) to allow user to post Invoice greater than Amount received (case is PO service for partial receive). However, we want that it will block user to post invoice more then the total value of PO.
Currently, if I set the tolerance limit, then it's possible to post invoice More than PO value as long as the variance is under its tolerance limit.
Any advice?
thanks,
nasikhinHi Ajit,
thanks for your reply, could you please tell us which transaction key?? i've tried PP, BD, LA but nothing works.
Moreover, I wonder if the price variance occured because of this tolerance could be posted to the particular Expense/Inventory instead of new GL account for price variance.
Currently, it's posted to the GL account I set up on OBYC for transaction DIF..
And when I lookup to the PO history, the invoice amount is the same with amount received, although the real invoice amount is over.
Any suggestion will be very appreciated.
Thanks,
Nasikhin -
Service Entry sheet to give message monthly amount exceed
Hello friends,
Here is the below query in service procurement.
We have created a service PO with 1 year validity, in service details we have entered qty and rate for the services for a month. We get the net amount for a month. Now we need this services for 12 months so we need to multiply the qty entered in services by 12.
So we need a check at the time of service entry sheet that services entered should not exceed monthly amount.
Thanks
Nitin Kishore
Screen shots attached for better understanding.There is one more TAB called Limits.
Give the Exact Amount which you are billing per month. And Try to do SES.
Thanks,
Shivaprasad -
The amount charged to our credit card was greater than the amount on our invoice.
This last month, our credit card was charged was charged an amount greater than what appeared on our invoice. Why did this happen, and how can we get a refund of the difference?
Yes, of course that's what I tried first. I attempted to use the Contact Support box in the lower right corner of:
https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/topics/getting-started.html
And got this:
We're sorry, but our records indicate you aren't eligible for this support option.
Experts are always available in our free community forums.
Hence my post here.
However, it appears that the URL you provided takes me to a completely different chat application, so perhaps I'll have better luck there. I'll give it a try.
Thanks for your help. -
Total Amount of Invoices is greater than the amount out of invoice
Hey guys,
One of my clients is using the credit card module to process payments in their system. This is fine except that often times the paid amount will vary from the A/R Invoice amount because of shipping costs, or whatever else.
We have the over/under payment system set up properly and it works when reconciling a payment and an invoice at payment entry, but if the two transactions already exist, it appears as though this extra transaction has to be created manually.
Does anyone have a workaround or other suggestion for this? This customer is processing literally hundreds of transactions that fit this scenario every day.
Thanks,
KevinKevin,
Its very clear now.
The Journal Entry for the Payment on Account - Incoming Payment transaction is created at the time the Payment is received.
If you notice how the Over/Under payment works the JE gets be posted at the time of Incoming Payment transaction. Whereas on Payment on Account transaction, the JE is already created, the link Invoices to Payment step simply updates the Invoice with the Paid Amt and does not create any new JE.
Therefore, if you have a Payment on Account transaction and it is short paid or over paid you will need to manually reconcile them using Internla reconciliation.
May be you can call it a Shortcoming but unfortunately this is how the system works.
You may chose to post this to SAP Support to get their Guidance on a Work around, if not you might have to write a small AddOn for this.
Best wishes
Suda -
Error Message FF747 -The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base
Hello,
We are attempting to post an import vendor invoice through transaction FB60 for Israel company code . Since the tax charged by the vendor is not fixed every time , we are entering the tax amount in the FB60 screen manually , without selecting 'calculate tax'.The amount of tax is greater than the amount of expense as per the real business scenario. For example amount of expense is 100, amount of tax is 200 and the total amount charged by the vendor is 300 .However when we simulate the posting we get an error - The tax amount must not be greater than the tax base-Message no. FF747
We tried putting a very high percentage in the tax code also but it didn't help
We would like to go ahead with this posting. Could you pl throw light on the same . ? Is there any way (OSS note ) or a work around which can resolve the issue ?
Best Regards
Amit KulkarniHello
This may be a work around in other cases , but since we want the amount to be updated in the BSET table for further VAT reports , we would like this to be posted along with the expense item -
GR Cancellation amount greater than GR?
Hi Expert,
May I know in what situation the GR cancellation amount is greater than GR in PO history?
I am facing a problem that:
1. Create a PO for 4 pcs of Material A, 1000 USD total.
2. IV for the material A, 4 pcs also, 1000 USD. The date of IV was before the GR date.
3. GR (mvt type 101) material A, for 3 pcs, but is 250 USD.
4. GR cancellation (mvt type 102) material A for 4 pcs, 1000 USD.
This confuse me a lot because as I know we cannot maintain the material value in GR for PO, why mvt type 101 will come out a 250 USD?
I try to create the same senario again but everything is all right now without any setting. The MIGO also doesn't has a field for me to maintain price.
Any idea?
Thanks~!from where exactly (which transaction, which field) did you pull the data?
4 pcs with a total of 1000 is just 250 per piece.
The 250 that you see for the movement, is that the price or the total value for the 3?
Usually SAP valuates the goods receipt with the invoice price if the IR was done before the GR, otherwise the GR is valuated with the PO price.
The reversal is done with the moving average.
You hide information in this example, as it is not logical to receive 3 but cancel 4. -
PO is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO am
Purchase Order is getting released even if the total amount is less than the last PO amount. The release strategy is only working for the first Purchase Order and if the PO amount is greater than the last PO amount.
Please let me know how to correct this scenario (release strategy).
Regards,
PrishuHi,
Release strategy has nothing do with the previous PO amount. May be, Co-incidently the amount in previous PO which you are referring and the characteristics value maintained in the release strategy is same.
1) Please go in release strategy by the path mentioned below
IMG u2013 Material Management u2013 Purchasing u2013 Purchase Requisition u2013 Release Procedure u2013 Procedure with Classification u2013 Set Up Procedure with Classification
2) Then go to release strategy. Here the total available release strategies would be displayed. Double click the strategy which is getting reflected in the PO you want and go the classifiction tab. There you will get the PO value. Based on this characteristic value the respective release streategy gets refelected.
I hope this clarifies.
Regards
sachin
Maybe you are looking for
-
can anyone help me get all of my edited holiday video visible again? my mac upgraded itself from iPhoto where i keep my imported video and photos, to "photo" now all of my current project (and probably old ones as well! ) are showing media offline. h
-
Just upgraded IOS to V7 and iphone is asking for a password and the online password will not work. I really need to get this sorted as I am away and need to get the phone working.
-
Downgrade ios6 back to ios 5.1.1
hi,i have the new ipad 16 gb wi-fi and i made upgrade to ios 6 ,my question is..can i downgrade back to original ios?ty
-
Computer 1 setup with code. When I follow instructions on computer 2 and select I already have account it give me set of codes to enter on first computer at :add device screen. Does not give me option option to add email address and password but tell
-
IBook G4 shuts down by its self
I replaced my hinges the other day and when I put it back together it would not boot up, it turned out that I needed to remove the hex screw on the right side on the underside of the laptop then it worked fine. Then today I replaced the cdrom drive w