Service level tracking items are not deleted

hi,
every time i add a new service level tracking, after that when I delete it, it is deleted from the service level tracking items. but it resides as available items when i want to run a SLA report.
i have already removed 'Test-Remove' from service level tracking in 'Authoring' tab but it still exist as available items to run a report as above picture.
do i have to remove it manually from sql server? any help is appreciated

Hi,
I checked on my lab, and I have the same result as yours. When I newed a service level tracking, I then go to the Operation DB to query below table
[OperationsManager].[dbo].[ServiceLevelObjective]
And found the object created, and then I delete the service level tracking on the operation manager console, and recheck the table again, the object is removed there also.
After that, I run service level tracking summary report, I can see the deleted service level tracking there.
It is hard to explain, but I think maybe there are temp files keep this information.
I would like to suggest you wait for some days and then recheck it.
Regards, Yan Li

Similar Messages

2LIS_02_ITM - Deleted items are not in the ODS 0PUR_O01

Hello,
We activated 2LIS_02_ITM extractor. We noticed that the deleted order items are not available in the ODS 0PUR_O01. SAP Note 578471 (Deleted positions in BW and statistics) explains that deleted items are not "statistical" relevant. However, this is an issue for us. Does anybody know if it's possible to change the behaviour of the extractor to keep deleted order items in the ODS ?
Many thanks.
François.

Yes this is a known behavior in case of deltas.
For Deleted line items Rocancel field will have an entry with R.
To handle this you need to map ROCANCEL field in Technical group of transformation (Between Datasource to DSO) with 0Recordmode.
Once you will do that then after activating the data in DSO it will nullify the records and deleted order or item will not appear.
Regards,
AL

Work items are not visible UWL task are visible in tracking in portal

HI
Friends
i am new from sap Ess/Mss implementation project...
i am facing an Problem " Work items are not visible under UWL in portal overview page"
but i am configured all the ess/mss related things....and also Created for one user for Requester(send Leave Request)...and one more user for App-rover(Apporve an Leave)..
Requestor send an Leave through portal send it successfully......but i am facing a problem in uwl under work items are not showing in overview page...but in tracking work items are (Leave request)showing.....work items are not showing in uwl TASK(VERY PROBLEM)...
i am configured and also registered UWL IN PORTAL..it is good..
in sap ecc i can assigned UWL_SERVICE user to roles
1.SAP_BC_BMT_WFM_UWL_ADMIN
2.SAP_BC_BMT_WFM_UWL_END_USER
3.SAP_BC_ADMIN_USER
4.SAP_BC_UWL_SERVICE
PLEASE HELP ME.
Tanks
Shaik Rafi

Hi All,
In such cases, please try to check as below :
1) Create Leave request work item from Employee and check the same under the UWL Tracking tab of employee.
2) Log-in to swi5 transaction of the respective back end system and give "US" -> manager's UserID -> Choose Tasks to be completed from the drop down -> Remove any date if mentioned -> Execute.
3) Here if you can see the Leave request created, but not on the portal, it reflects some portal issue like sync.
4) If no leave request work item is seen here, then there is a problem in the employee manager mapping or the workflow setup.
5) In such cases, you can try to check the Swi1 and check the log of that workflow to understand the current status of the Leave request.
Revert if further help is needed with more info.
Reward points if found useful.
Regards,
Shri vidya S

An hour ago, I accidentally deleted a "Bookmarks" folder, and all of subfolders and hyperlinks. The lost items are not in "Trash." Are they still retrievable? JAW

An hour ago, I accidentally deleted a Bookmarks folder, and all of subfolders and hyperlinks. The lost items are not in "Trash." Are they still retrievable? JAW

They don't go into the Trash. Unless you have a backup prior to the deletion time it's gone.

Emails are not delete from the handheld/server

Hello,
Our client has Blackberry 8330.
Emails are not deleted nor from the server nor from the phone. Maybe there any other setting set? Or are these settings set wrong?
Thanks you
He has these settings:
under Messages - Options - General Options, there's this field for "Keep message for" --> 2 months
The Options >Email reconciliation
Delete On: Mailbox & Handheld
Wireless Reconcile: ON
On Conflicsts: Mailbox Wins

Endriuska wrote:
It looks like it only synchrozines mailbox to handheld(if deleted from mailbox, will delete from handheld), but will it delete from mailbox if the email is deleted from handheld?
As discussed in the KB I linked for you, it depends. If, in the top grid, there is a YES in the Wireless Deletion column for the subject email service AND you have further configured, as per the KB you found, for deleted item reconciliation, then yes it should delete from the server when you delete from the HH.
Note that there may be a time lag, however -- deleted item reconciliation tends to be one of the lowest priority activities inside of both BIS as well as the email providers systems...I've seen it take up to 24 hours (not normally, but that's the extreme that I've witnessed).
Further, I believe that the on-HH setting for "Keep Messages" should have no effect on the server...deleted item reconciliation is a function of the end user actually deleting from the HH...not the auto-removal by virtue of this setting.
Hope that helps!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Records are not deleting in SAP CCM (CCM2.0), eventhough Action code 03 is

Hi all,
We are facing a problem in SAP CCM 2.0, products are not deleting from Catalogs ( Internal Catalogs) eventhough action code '03' ( Deletion) is passing to Catalogs.
In case of updating and new records creation is working fine , changes are updating and new records getting added to catalogs.
Could you please advise why deletion is not working. what would be the reason.
Is there any other way to delete the records from the Catalog.
thanks in advance

Hi,
There is no standard functionality for deleting items from SRM CCM 2.0.
Very recently, we have come across the same problem that materials/items which are deleted in SAP R/3 4.7 are not getting deleted from SRM CCM 2.0 catalog.
We have done some analysis and found the below solution.
- You need to send an action code "04" and drop Product Category information in XML file which XI uses to send the information from ERP to SRM CCM catalog.
For this you need to modify the XML and XI mapping for the ZACTION code(03) received from ERP.
Once the changes are done in XML, you re-publish the catalog.
You will find the item/s have got deleted from the catalog.
Note: It is important to note that even for deletion, system records action as catalog items Update/Created in the logs (SLG1) but not the action as catalog items deleted.
Hope this helps !
Regards,
Vikas

We are using SAP SRM to punch out external catalogs. Firefox version 3.5 and below works fine and the items from the catalogs are brought back to SRM .But when we use version 3.6.12 the items are not getting transferred back to SRM from the Catalogs.

SRM is a procurement system from SAP which we use to purchase goods and service. We have external catalogs like officemax, cdw etc which we punchout the items and bring it to SRM for ordering.
When we use firefox version 3.5 and below the items which we add from the Catalogs are correctly brought back to SRM for us to order. But when we use versions 3.6.12 the items are not brought back to SRM.
Internet Explorer 7 and 8 works fine. Is there anyway you can help us.
Thanks
Jayant

Hi,
Firstly I would suggest you to upgrade your database from Oracle Release 11.2.0.1.0 to Oracle Release 11.2.0.2 . This is the recommended Oracle 11g database version for SAP solutions. Many of your problem will get resolved with it.
Question 1:
So my first question would be is there any other suggestions besides adjusting the mentioned parameter above in order to ensure that no work processors going into hang state due to RFCs' occupying it as this issue always happens at the end of the month only when there are massive users accessing it.
For immediate resolution the approach you have followed is correct viz limiting number of dialog processes for RFC. Secondly you need to analyze why RFC processing takes so much time. You need check which programs are getting executed by those RFC.
Generate EarlyWatch report for more detailed view
Question 2:
My second question is what went wrong with the libttsh11.so file. How could it be 0 size in PRD when no signs of changes had happen to the PRD system. Is this a proven Oracle Bug or something else since I have never encountered anything like this before.
The libttsh11.so library cannot be found in the related directory.
Cause
The file system is mounted using CIO option, but per Note 257338.1 Direct I/O (DIO) and Concurrent I/O (CIO) on AIX 5L, an ORACLE_HOME on a filesystem mounted with "cio" option is not supported.
Such a configuration will cause, installation, relinking and other unexpected problems.
Solution
Disable the CIO option on the filesystem.
References
NOTE:257338.1 - Direct I/O (DIO) and Concurrent I/O (CIO) on AIX 5L
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

In my library, under the Artist column only...items are not listed in alpha order. How can I get that to happen?

In my library, under the Artist column only...items are not listed in alpha order. How can I get that to happen?

Same deal as your other thread but with Artist/Sort Artist:
https://discussions.apple.com/message/25561674#25561674
For more info. on how iTunes organizes things see Grouping tracks into albums.
tt2

Leave Request work items are not showing in SBWP TCODE under OUTBOX .

Hi
Friends
I used work flow 12300111 for leave request process and I activated that work flow.
I applied leave through ESS from portal(Employee login)employee sends a leave request sends good,
and I got Leave request(work items) Managers in box(uwl in Manager Login in portal).
Manger Approve the leave request has been approved successfully.
can I check whether leave request is processed in R/3.
in tcode se38-RPTARQDBVIEW - UNDER leave request(Leave)->STATUS>COMPLETED,
But in r/3 i execute the Tcode SBWP...
here is no work items are not showing in outbox..
Please help me
Rafi Shaik

it wont be shown in outbox of SBWP
you need to check via SWIA or rptarqdbview or SWI5 for the user
these are java based tasks so will be done in UWL. you can see only the tasks but after approval they are disappeared.
The outbox shows the last 30 days by default. This default cannot be
changed. This 30 days selection period is always set when you enter
the outbox. However, the user can change the selection period by
clicking the button 'Change selection period' on top of the grid
control but this as you know will be reset once you log out.
This is how the mapping from the
backend workplace folders to the UWL tabs should work:
UWL tab                        Backend folder
Notifications                  Deadline Messages
Tasks-> Completed Tasks        Outbox -> Workitems executed by me
Tracking -> My Requests        Outbox -> Started Workflows
Tracking -> Forwarded          Outbox -> Forwarded workitems
Edited by: Siddharth Rajora on Aug 5, 2011 10:04 AM

I am constantly told by Itunes that 107 items are not synching from my contacts. This is a message from the Conflict Resolver that appears whenever I synch. I try to resolve the synch and a text message pops up telling me it could not find the synch serve

I am constantly told by Itunes that 107 items are not synching from my Ipod Touch to/from Outlook Contacts. I try to resolve the issue and eventually a message pops up saying it could not be completed because it could not find the sync server. This started after one of the updates a couple of months ago. If anyone has found a similar problem and resolved it I would appreciate any assistance.
Thanks

Try here:
Advanced troubleshooting for Sync Services on Windows with Microsoft Outlook 2003, Outlook 2007, or Outlook 2010
Sync Services: Advanced troubleshooting for contact and calendar syncing

Call items are not created for Org BP's when created from Campaigns

Hello All,
We are creating Campaigns for Org BP's and pushing them to channel Phone, which is creating call list but call items are not created for Org BP's.
Org BP's are maintained with Contact Person's, callling hours and phone number are maintained against contact person BP, but still call items are not created with in call list.
Please let me know if I miss any further steps.
Thanks,
Raj.

Hi Debasis,
You can delete the PDS by using /SAPAPO/CULL_RTO_DEL - Delete Production Data Structure . And recif the it to APO. You can use CURTO_CREATE for it.
For the error message /SAPAPO/OM_ERROR2 119 there are couple of OSS notes please check the same.
1648558 - CIF error: 'Mode linkage problem with primary resource'
1325227 - PDS-EXP: Mode linkage problem with primary resource
Regards,
RBrahmankar

Large list items are not crawling

Recently we have migrated SharePoint 2007 application to SharePoint 2013. In that we are having a list which contains 40000+ items and each item have unique permissions set based on the business requirement.
After migration, we have ran full crawl on the web application. After the crawl, the list items are not crawled and displayed in the search results. When checked in the crawl log, there is no entry related to the list items.
Based on suggestions from the blog and microsoft we have changed the FilterProcessMemoryQuota and DedicatedFilterProcessMemoryQuota to 500 MB from 100 MB.
Still, the items are not crawled. Later we have modified some of the items in the list and ran the incremental crawl. The list items which are modified are crawled and available in the search results.
We have scheduled the incremental crawl to run on every night and full crawl to run every week end (saturday) night. What happened is the incremental crawl that run after full crawl deletes all the items which are modified and crawled before the full crawl
with a message "Deleted by the gatherer ( This item was deleted because its parent was deleted. )". This happens only with the incremental crawl run after the full crawl, but the subsequent incremental crawls add the items to the
search results until full crawl run.
Please advise on this.
Ramkumar

40k items with individual permissions? That's going to have significant performance impact across your content database and is getting close to the hard limit(?) of 50k scopes per list http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/gg128955(v=office.15).aspx
Having said that...
Your full crawl is picking up the items but the first incremental crawl is subsequently deleting them. Are you really using Incremental crawl or is this continuous crawling? Are all list items being deleted or merely some of them?
I'd normally put this down to the crawler not being able to identify the items, which may be the case here, but this sounds a little more interesting.

Reg: Certain Open Items are not showing in open item clearing F-44

HI all,
I want clear open items using with f-44 but cetain open items are not showing in opeing item clearing. i checked in FBL1N all open items are shwoing i want see all open items inf-44 how to see plz help me
with regards
JK Rao

Hi,
Check whether you r giving some additional selection take it as none and are the items in the account have any special indicator you might not be giving here.
reward pts if useful
regds

Asset Line items are not updating in table ANEP

Hi friends,
I found that asset line items are not getting updated in ANEP table,.
This is my precedure for posting of depreciation.
I'll create Asset through AS01, then i'll use the T.Code: F-90.. then i'll run the depreciation program thru t.Code: AFAB.
In but i am unable to capture the values of Planned and Depreciated or Posted values in ANEP.. Is there is any other table for this...
Where is the mistake in my process..
thanks in advance..
Naveen

HI Naveen
The FI-AA documents are stored in tables ANEK (document header), ANEP (document line items) and ANEA (proportional values). You can use FI-AA standard report RABEWG_ALV01 to list all transactions to an asset in one fiscal year, and report RAABGA_ALV01 to list only retirement postings.
ANEA should be the solution you are looking for.
Hope it helps!
Cheers
Z

Few line items are not coming at the time of creation of delivery

Dear Experts,
When the user creating the delivery few line items are not picking in the delivery document
the following checks i verified,
Stock is available
shpping condition is differ from sold to party and sales document
Plants are same for all the line items
why the few line items are not coming in the delivery document creation,
please help me to sort out this issue
Thanks and Best Regards,
Muralidharan S

Hi,
Check below points.
Point 1:
When you create a delivery document, you create it for a Shipping Point.
So whatever the line that came in to one delivery has determined same shipping point that you entered in VL01N screen.
Others got a different shipping point and that's why it didn't come to the same delivery document.
Shipping point determined based on below criteria
- Shipping Condition - From customer master
- Loading Group - Material
- Plant - Delivery Plant of the sales order line item
You assign a proffered shipping point for above combination in configuration.
If that combination is not find, those line items are not going in to the delivery.
You can check the log of the delivery document for more information as well.
Point 2:
Check the line item Requested delivery date and the "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
Al Requested delivery dates has to be on or before the "Selection Date" you entered in the VL01N screen.
Those line items which has a date more than that will dropped in the delivery.
Best regards,
Anupa

Service level tracking items are not deleted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for