ServiceRequest field value too long, 2000 character max (SBL-EAI-13011)

When I enter more than 2000 characters for a particular field - description, the update : "srequest.ServiceRequestUpdate(inset_input);"
produces the following error:
{System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: Field 'Description' in the integration component 'Service Request' contains value 'detaidd...', which is longer than allowed length of 2000 characters.(SBL-EAI-13011)
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.ReadResponse
Does anyone know why I am getting this 2000 character limit when I know this field should support 65k characters (65k is the max when using the ondemand website) ?
Thanks Ahead Of Time

Yeah you are correct. On OnDemand the length of this field is 16 K. This field is of Type CLOB in OnDemand
But web services / analytics / reports doesn't support this field type and we have to restrict to length of 2000 K (This is a limitation)
Till June that limitation was in place, I don't have the latest update. May be in some of recent patch they have corrected this.

Similar Messages

P13n.ddl probs with UDB: field "value" too long to index

We're trying to deploy the p13n.ddl on a UDB DB2 6.1.
However, we encountered some problems:
In UDB 6.1, an indexed column can be max 255 bytes long. So, the index
WEBLOGIC_USER_ID_INDEX cannot be created, as the column "value" is one
byte too long.
CREATE TABLE WEBLOGIC_USER (userid int, property varchar(100), value
varchar(256));
CREATE INDEX WEBLOGIC_USER_ID_INDEX ON WEBLOGIC_USER (userid, property,
value)
How hard will omitting the "value" column from the index hit performance?
All the columns in the table WEBLOGIC_USER has been indexed in one index.
Was that done to prevent the DBMS from looking into the actual table at
all (by looking only in the index)?
Would it be possible to use the column as a varchar(255) or must it be
256 chars wide? (Taking into consideration that the values at present are
far from 256 chars.)
Anders B. Jensen
Consultant, Research & Development
[email protected]
LEC AS
Denmark
Remove the SPAMLESS to mail me.

What you are trying to do shouldn't be a problem.
There is no problems creating the weblogic_user as a varchar(255).
I am not sure about omiting the "value" column and related performance
issues, but I don't think it will be significant.
"Anders B. Jensen" wrote:
We're trying to deploy the p13n.ddl on a UDB DB2 6.1.
However, we encountered some problems:
In UDB 6.1, an indexed column can be max 255 bytes long. So, the index
WEBLOGIC_USER_ID_INDEX cannot be created, as the column "value" is one
byte too long.
CREATE TABLE WEBLOGIC_USER (userid int, property varchar(100), value
varchar(256));
CREATE INDEX WEBLOGIC_USER_ID_INDEX ON WEBLOGIC_USER (userid, property,
value)
How hard will omitting the "value" column from the index hit performance?
All the columns in the table WEBLOGIC_USER has been indexed in one index.
Was that done to prevent the DBMS from looking into the actual table at
all (by looking only in the index)?
Would it be possible to use the column as a varchar(255) or must it be
256 chars wide? (Taking into consideration that the values at present are
far from 256 chars.)
Anders B. Jensen
Consultant, Research & Development
[email protected]
LEC AS
Denmark
Remove the SPAMLESS to mail me.

Create_portlet_definition.sql probs with UDB: field "value" too long to index

We're trying to deploy the create_portlet_definition.sql on a UDB DB2
6.1.
However, we encountered some problems:
"COLUMN_ORDER" cannot be a part of the primary key because it can contain
null values:
CREATE TABLE "COLUMN_INFORMATION"
("PORTAL_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"CATEGORY_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"COLUMN_WIDTH" INT,
"COLUMN_ORDER" INT,
PRIMARY KEY(PORTAL_NAME, CATEGORY_NAME, COLUMN_ORDER));
"GROUP_ID" cannot be a part of the primary key because it can contain
null values:
CREATE TABLE "GROUP_PERSONALIZATION"
("PORTAL_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"CATEGORY_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"PORTLET_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"GROUP_ID" VARCHAR(100),
"AVAILABLE" INT,
"MANDATORY" INT,
"EDITABLE" INT,
"MOVEABLE" INT,
"MINIMIZEABLE" INT,
"MAXIMIZEABLE" INT,
"FLOATABLE" INT,
"VISIBLE" INT,
"X" INT,
"Y" INT,
"MINIMIZED" INT,
PRIMARY KEY(PORTAL_NAME, CATEGORY_NAME, PORTLET_NAME, GROUP_ID))
Will these two columns ever contain a null value ?
Anders B. Jensen
Consultant, Research & Development
[email protected]
LEC AS
Denmark
Remove the SPAMLESS to mail me.

any value that can contain null should not be a part of the primary key ever.
I would just change the script so that the columns are not nullable - however,
somebody from weblogic should confirm that this is ok.
Filip
In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
>
We're trying to deploy the create_portlet_definition.sql on a UDB DB2
6.1.
However, we encountered some problems:
"COLUMN_ORDER" cannot be a part of the primary key because it can contain
null values:
CREATE TABLE "COLUMN_INFORMATION"
("PORTAL_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"CATEGORY_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"COLUMN_WIDTH" INT,
"COLUMN_ORDER" INT,
PRIMARY KEY(PORTAL_NAME, CATEGORY_NAME, COLUMN_ORDER));
"GROUP_ID" cannot be a part of the primary key because it can contain
null values:
CREATE TABLE "GROUP_PERSONALIZATION"
("PORTAL_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"CATEGORY_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"PORTLET_NAME" VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
"GROUP_ID" VARCHAR(100),
"AVAILABLE" INT,
"MANDATORY" INT,
"EDITABLE" INT,
"MOVEABLE" INT,
"MINIMIZEABLE" INT,
"MAXIMIZEABLE" INT,
"FLOATABLE" INT,
"VISIBLE" INT,
"X" INT,
"Y" INT,
"MINIMIZED" INT,
PRIMARY KEY(PORTAL_NAME, CATEGORY_NAME, PORTLET_NAME, GROUP_ID))
Will these two columns ever contain a null value ?
Anders B. Jensen
Consultant, Research & Development
[email protected]
LEC AS
Denmark
Remove the SPAMLESS to mail me.--
Filip Hanik
Software Architect
XMarkstheSpot.com
[email protected]

Unable to evaluate workflow rule - Value too long for field

Need help with a workflow error for a record update before the record is saved. There are 3 calculations that would be done in a particular order - all on number fields. Each time, I am overwriting existing values. The individual numbers could have up to 6 decimal spaces. When I try to update one or more fields that contain the calculation, I get an error message saying that the system is unable to evaluate the workflow rule - value too long for field (zNum6).
This same calculation is fine when a new record is entered and the calculation is done as a default field value.
Any ideas?

I actually had to use a ToChar function at the beginning of the calculation and #### to indicate the number of digits to make this work. Oracle Help Desk provided the answer - quickly.

FRM-40831: Value too long for field ROWID.

Hi,
I'm a newbie in forms and I've a problem when working with index organized tables, it post me this error:
FRM-40831: Truncation occurred : Value too long for field ROWID.
How can I solve this problem?
Thanks for your help.
RaÃºl

This is a bug in Forms 9i (bug 2408210). The workaround is to:
- change block property Key Mode to Updatable or Non-Updatable
- set item property Promary Key to Yes for all items that correspond to an index column in the index-organized table

Smartforms - Character field is too long

Hi
In my smartform I use a template, one of the fields is too long for the space it has in a template, and then it is shown too short. I want to show the whole field but in two lines, since there is no space in one line. Any suggestions in how I can trigger line feed.

Hi
If the cell of the template has more than 1 rows, the text should be written in two lines automatically.
Max

Inserted value too long ...

Hi,
I tried to migrate a VARCHAR2 (2000) column into an other VARCHAR2 (2000) column in an other database.
I get the error message "Inserted value too long ..."
length (source) = 1998
The target database has a Unicode character set.
Could you help me?

Hi,
If your initial database is non-unicode and your target in unicode, your length 1998 cannot insert into varchar2(2000). If I well remember, there is a ratio for size from non-unicode to unicode : x3. That's why Oracle cannot insert 1998 from non-unicode to varchar2(2000) into unicode.
There is good metalink article
119119.1 : UTF8 Database Character Set Implications
144808.1 : Examples and limits of BYTE and CHAR semantics usage
Nicolas.

FCC error :java.lang.Exception: Column value ' ' too long

Hi all,
I am using FCC on receiving File adapter...
While executing i am getting this error in CC monitor
com.sap.aii.af.ra.ms.api.RecoverableException: Exception in XML Parser (format problem?):'java.lang.Exception: Message processing failed in XML parser: 'java.lang.Exception: Column value ' ' too long (>1 for 2. column) - must stop',
i searched in SDN but no luck till now..
Plz help me out..
Thanx in advance.

Hi,
Check ur FCC parameters,
File content conversion sites
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/02/introduction-to-simplefile-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart1
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/03/introduction-to-simple-file-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart2
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/02/file-receiver-with-content-conversion
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/06/08/content-conversion-patternrandom-content-in-input-file
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/17/nab-the-tab-file-adapter
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/02/introduction-to-simplefile-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart1
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/03/03/introduction-to-simple-file-xi-filescenario-and-complete-walk-through-for-starterspart2
/people/venkat.donela/blog/2005/06/08/how-to-send-a-flat-file-with-various-field-lengths-and-variable-substructures-to-xi-30
/people/anish.abraham2/blog/2005/06/08/content-conversion-patternrandom-content-in-input-file
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2005/08/17/nab-the-tab-file-adapter
/people/jeyakumar.muthu2/blog/2005/11/29/file-content-conversion-for-unequal-number-of-columns
/people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2006/02/27/content-conversion-the-key-field-problem
/people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2004/12/15/how-to-send-a-flat-file-with-fixed-lengths-to-xi-30-using-a-central-file-adapter
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/02/file-receiver-with-content-conversion
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/d2/bab440c97f3716e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards,
Phani.
Reward points if Helpful

FRM-40831 : Truncation occured: value too long for filed MAST_EMP_NAME

Hi
I'm using Forms 5 and getting following error.
FRM-40831 : Truncation occured: value too long for filed MAST_EMP_NAME.
When i checked in the column Mast_emp_name, all the values are with in the limit.
Table contains some 9 lacs record.
Please help me. this is very urgent

check the maximum length - property of all those 5 columns in your form. They have to be as long as in the database. Except number. They have to be 1 char longer than in the db.
Forms-Online-Help says:
This property can potentially limit the amount of data that an item is allowed to contain internally (in the Forms server) when it's in native format. It can also potentially limit the number of character (or bytes) displayed or entered by the end user. That is, it can specify a data limit and/or a user interface (UI) limit. The exact effect depends upon several factors, including the item's Data type, Data Length Semantics, and Format Mask properties. For a character item (datatypes CHAR, ALPHA, LONG), the Maximum Length property specifies a data limit. The property value specifies either the maximum number of bytes or else the maximum number of characters, depending upon the value of the Data Length Semantics property. Within a group of character mirror items, the Maximum Length property is always taken from the master mirror item. A compiler (generator) warning is issued if a non-zero non-default value is specified in a subordinate mirror item. If a character item has no format mask (the Format Mask property is null), then the Maximum Length property (taken from the master mirror item) also specifies a UI limit. When the Forms server is using the UTF8 character set , this UI limit has the same semantics (byte versus character) as the data limit. When the Forms server is using a multi-byte character set other than UTF8, and the Data Length Semantics property specifies byte semantics, Forms cannot prevent the end user from typing in too many bytes. Instead, it uses character semantics for the UI limit. In such a case, the end user is allowed to type in too many bytes. When the end user attempts to navigate out of the current validation unit, one of two things will happen. If the application property FLAG_USER_VALUE_TOO_LONG is set, an error will be flagged and the excess characters on the right will be selected. If this application property is not set, the excess characters will be quietly truncated, and the navigation will succeed. If a character item has a format mask, then the item's UI limit is derived from the format mask. This limit is always a character limit. For a number item (datatypes NUMBER, INT, MONEY, RNUMBER, RINT, RMONEY), the Maximum Length property specifies a user interface limit. This limit is always a character limit. There is no data limit. The data item can always internally hold up to 23 bytes (which is the maximum size of an Oracle number in native format), regardless of the value of the Maximum Length property. For a date or time item (datatypes DATETIME, DATE, TIME, JDATE, EDATE), the Maximum Length property specified in Forms Builder has almost no effect (See the Query Length property for a discussion of the only effect). As with "number" items, there is no data limit. For DATE and DATETIME items, the internal value is 7 bytes long, and for TIME, JDATE and EDATE items, the internal value is 4 bytes long . The user interface limit is derived from the format mask. This limit is always a character limit which is what is returned by GET_ITEM_PROPERTY(item, MAX_LENGTH).

Large XML Publisher reports fail with client-error-request-value-too-long

We are running BI Publisher 5.6.3 with Oracle Applications 11.5.10.2 (ATG.H RUP 5), and are having frequent failures with client-error-request-value-too-long messages on large PDF reports that cause the entire report to not print.
The exact error message is as follows:
lp: unable to print file: client-error-request-value-too-long
Pasta: Error: Print failed. Command=lp -c -dPDX_B6_1LJ5200NEAST /logs/temp/pasta3262_0.tmp
Pasta: Error: Check printCommand/ntPrintCommand in pasta.cfg
Pasta: Error: Preprocess or Print command failed!!!
APP-FND-00500: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from routine FDUPRN. Program exited with status 1
Cause: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from the OSD routine FDUPRN. Program exited with status 1.
Action: Review your concurrent request log file for more detailed information.
I have Google'd client-error-request-value-too-long, and found it is a common CUPS issue on Linux. The popular solutions (having /var/spool/cups and /var/spool/cups/tmp) are already in place. Also, the temp files are nowhere near 2 GB (44MB).
Has anyone had this issue with BI Publisher on Linux?

Thanks for the link. It looks like the sysadmins have throttled cups to low to allow large bitmapped print jobs:
grep MaxRequestSize cupsd.conf
# MaxRequestSize: controls the maximum size of HTTP requests and print files.
MaxRequestSize 10M
I am trying to get a more reasonable size limit.

Large BI Publisher reports fail with client-error-request-value-too-long

We are running BI Publisher 5.6.3 with Oracle Applications 11.5.10.2, and are having frequent failures with client-error-request-value-too-long messages on large PDF reports that cause the entire report to not print.
The exact error message is as follows:
lp: unable to print file: client-error-request-value-too-long
Pasta: Error: Print failed. Command=lp -c -dPDX_B6_1LJ5200NEAST /logs/temp/pasta3262_0.tmp
Pasta: Error: Check printCommand/ntPrintCommand in pasta.cfg
Pasta: Error: Preprocess or Print command failed!!!
APP-FND-00500: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from routine FDUPRN. Program exited with status 1
Cause: AFPPRN received a return code of failure from the OSD routine FDUPRN. Program exited with status 1.
Action: Review your concurrent request log file for more detailed information.
I have Google'd client-error-request-value-too-long, and found it is a common CUPS issue on Linux. The popular solutions (having /var/spool/cups and /var/spool/cups/tmp) are already in place. Also, the temp files are nowhere near 2 GB (44MB).
Has anyone had this issue with BI Publisher on Linux?

The linux sysadmins set the cups max_request_size at 10 MB, which was causing this error. Once the restriction was lifted, the reports ran without error.

Column value ' ' too long - must stop', probably configuration error

Hi Experts,
I have a Proxy to File Scenario when I execute it I get this error in RWB. Can you please help me on this:
Message processing failed. Cause: com.sap.aii.messaging.adapter.trans.TransformException: Error converting Message: 'java.lang.Exception: Exception in XML Parser (format problem?):'java.lang.Exception: Message processing failed in XML parser: 'java.lang.Exception: Column value ' ' too long - must stop', probably configuration error in file adapter (XML parser error)''; nested exception caused by: java.lang.Exception: Exception in XML Parser (format problem?):'java.lang.Exception: Message processing failed in XML parser: 'java.lang.Exception: Column value ' ' too long - must stop', probably configuration error in file adapter (XML parser error)'
Thanks
Srikanth E

Hi,
if there is any empty tag coming from source then target structure tag will not be created and because of which ur payload structure and FCC configuration is not matching.
To use map with default between source and target strcture so in case source tag dont have value target structure will be created because of mapwithdegfault fuction and ur FCC will not fail.
Open SXMB_MONI output payload and compare the structre with Data type u will se for no source value target tag is not created at all and FCC is failed.
please refer below thread,
0 byte txt file using receiver File Adapter
regards,
ganesh.

Client-error-request-value-too-long

What is this error???? I am trying to add an Epson 1280 printer and I get this error. I have the most current driver and not sure why this isn't working.

My flatmate had this "client-error-request-value-too-long" problem with her (powerpc) powerbook. Nearly everything I tried didn't work:
1) Reinstalling drivers
2) Permissions repair
3) Resetting print system using Fixamac's Printer Setup Repair Utility
4) Updating from 10.4.10 to 10.4.11
5) Using the command line to try and recreate the directory: /var/spool/cups/tmp (which told me it already existed)
6) Using Transmit (with show invisible files turned on) to browse to /var/spool/cups/ and try and recreate the tmp folder
On the last point I couldn't change anything about the /var/spool/cups/ directory because the permissions were corrupted in some way. It keep telling me tmp already existed but I couldn't see it.
In the end what did work was enabling and logging in as root, browsing to /var/spool/ using Transmit and deleting the cups folder and then recreating. It took a few tries to delete too, but in the end I managed to remove it.
Of course I wouldn't actually recommend this. I'm no Unix geek so god knows what I might have broken in the process, so I'm going to reinstall her system with the Archive and Install options when I get a chance, which is what I'd recommend doing in the first place to anyone having this problem.

Error: "client-error-request-value-too-long" when trying to add printer

After installing the 10.4.9 Combo update, my HP 1350 All-in-One printer was not recognized. I reinstalled the driver, but now I can't add the printer. I get the error message "client-error-request-value-too-long" when trying to add the printer. Has anyone else experienced a similar problem.
Thanks in advance

Well, I tried all of that and I'm still getting the error message. I've also repaired disk permissions and run Disk Warrior. When I repaired disk permissions, many HP printer items showed up in the list.

ORA-20001: FLEX-VALUE TOO LONG

I am getting ORA-20001: FLEX-VALUE TOO LONG error message while updating
payroll_id using hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg_criteria package.
Please let me know if you have any Idea.
thank you,
Ravi kanth

I am getting ORA-20001: FLEX-VALUE TOO LONG error message while updating
payroll_id using hr_assignment_api.update_emp_asg_criteria package.
Please let me know if you have any Idea.
thank you,
Ravi kanth

ServiceRequest field value too long, 2000 character max (SBL-EAI-13011)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for