Setting PXI 4472 anti-alias filter

Please excuse what is probably a very stupid question.  I am new to using the PXI DSAs
On a PXI-4472 DSA (as run by a PXI-8196 controller running LV 8.2) how do you programmatically set the cutoff frequency for the anti-aliasing filter?  Can you even do this?  I tried using the AI.Lowpass.CuttoffFreq property to set it, but it just returns error -200452 and says that "Specified property is not supported by the device or is not applicable to the task."
Thanks!!

Panthera395,
devchandler is correct the cutoff frequency is automatically set based on the sampling rate.  The only way to modify the cutoff frequency is to either disable to filter, or change your sampling rate.  For more information take a look at the NI Dynamic Signal Acquisition Help:
http://digital.ni.com/manuals.nsf/websearch/FCD835​105CD3A20E86257130005DA240
The section on the Anti-Alias Filters explains the behavior of the anti-aliasing filters in more detail.  Let us know if you have any additional questions.  Good luck with your application.
Regards,
Neil S.
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
Message Edited by Neil S. on 09-14-2006 12:39 PM

Similar Messages

  • How to disable NI 5752 anti-alias filter

    Hi all!
    I have a question concerning the digitizer NI-5752 which has a anti-aliasing filter of 7.5, 10 or 14 MHz. I was wondering if I can disable this filter for acquiring the data. Considering its 50MSs, we are able to digitize till 25MHz, but if we get this 14MHz filter, we loss a lot of information right?
    Thank you for the response.
    Regards,
    Alberto

    Hi Alberto and Tobias,
    The NI 5752 is a NI FlexRIO™ digitizer adapter module, and so it is a bit different than most 51xx/56xx/59xx digitizers which use NI-SCOPE. Most of the configurable settings on the NI 5752 depend on the TI AFE5801 chip that the NI 5752 is built upon. While you are correct that the Nyquist frequency is 25 MHz, the AFE5801 chip only has options for 7.5, 10, and 14 MHz anti-aliasing filters (AAF). Unfortunately, this AAF cannot be disabled so 14 MHz is the maximum bandwidth of the chip. According to the AFE5801 spec sheet, you will have -6 dB of attenuation @ 20 MHz and -12 dB of attenuation @ 30 MHz with the 14 MHz filter selected. Hope this helps,
    Daniel S.
    National Instruments

  • CS 4 - Arial no anti-alias problem

    Hi - I've been using CS4 which I purchased recently.
    I don't know if its a bug or not, but when I select the arial
    font and set it to no anti-alias it changes to 'arial MT' which
    isn't the same. If it's set to 'smooth anti-alias' it stays as
    arial. It's really really annoying. Does anyone know of a fix for
    this?
    I know we work with anti-alias but why can't the fonts look
    smooth and crisp like a web page renders them?
    Thanks in advance,
    Jared.

    "plasmoid" <[email protected]> wrote in
    message
    news:gh767k$e10$[email protected]..
    > yeah exactly, that's the problem I'm having, its almost
    embaressing and
    > I'm
    > sure I'm gonna get people saying "can we change the font
    or does it have
    > to
    > stay like that?"
    >
    > It's really disappointing... I find the smooth
    anti-aliased not that
    > smooth as
    > it seems a bit blurry for me.
    >
    > Anyway - its really ******* annoying. I just hope a
    patch will fix it.
    >
    > Glad I'm not the only one, but kinda p**sd that I am
    aren't as I was
    > hoping
    > there was a work around.
    Adobe has some good people but I'm afraid they also have a
    lot of folks who
    are clearly (no pun intended) deluded about some things.
    Consider this
    little test:
    http://www.projectseven.com/testing/fwcs4/font-smoothing/
    Al Sparber - PVII
    http://www.projectseven.com
    Fully Automated Menu Systems | Galleries | Widgets
    http://www.projectseven.com/go/Elevators

  • Low pass filter (PXI 4472)

    Hi,
    I would like to know whether the PXI4472 module has a built-in low pass filter ?? If yes, can you send me the specfication for that filter?? Also, does the the SCXI 1125 support Vrms = 2500V isolation ??

    Hello,
    The PXI-4472 has a antialias filter which limits the bandwidth of the signal it can represent. The SCXI-1125 has +-300 Vrms of working isolation per channel. The information regarding the PXI-4472 filters and the SCXI isolation specifications may be found at NI Product Manuals.
    Let me know if you have any further questions. For direct questions regarding the PXI-4472, you will be better off posting a new question to the DSA discussion forum.
    Best Regards,
    Jared A

  • Frame Controls: Anti-Alias & Details Level

    Can anyone give me a general rule of thumb as to when these need to be used, and exactly how much. 1-100 seems like a lot of leeway...
    Thanks.

    Those settings are not very well documented. Here is what the Compressor User Manual says:
    Adaptive Details: Select this checkbox to use advanced image analysis to distinguish between noise and edge areas.
    • Anti-alias: Use this slider to set a softness level from 0 to 100. This parameter improves the quality of conversions when you’re scaling media up. For example, when transcoding standard definition video to high definition, Anti-alias smooths out jagged edges that might appear in the image.
    • Details Level: Use this slider to set a level (from 0 to 100) to preserve sharp edges. This is a sharpening control that lets you add detail back to an image being enlarged. Unlike other sharpening operations, the Details Level setting is able to distinguish between noise and feature details, and generally doesn’t increase unwanted grain. Increasing this parameter may introduce jagged edges, however, which can be eliminated by increasing the Anti-alias level.
    Note: Adaptive Details, Anti-alias, and Details Level pertain only to frame resizing (scaling), not deinterlacing.
    You really have to do some tests, as this depends on the kind of content and the source/delivery frame size.
    I watched a presentation from WWDC 2007, where Doug Werner, who compress video for http://www.apple.com/trailers (using Compressor - which is not a toy as some may think), said he used to choose a Detail Level of 50, when downscaling from 1080p to 480p, but for that particular clip he changed it to 20 (Resize filter was set to Better, and Adaptive Details was not checked). Apparently, sharpening also applies to downscaling and not only to enlarging as the user manual might indicate.
    To really get the best results, do some short tests on relevant parts of your media before you apply your settings or save them as presets, because there is a lot of different content that has to be handled in different ways.
    I guess the general rule of thumb would be: Test, test, test, and use what you see and learn from the results to fine tune your settings for that particular type of content. Action content with a lot of fast cuts and motion, often demands more care and attention than the opposite.
    Use the recommendations/tips from others to guide you in the right direction, but use the settings you think looks the best in the end.
    Good luck!

  • Mating smb connectors for pxi-4472

    Where can I obtain mating smb connectors for pxi-4472 Dynamic Signal Analyzer. Prefer vendor and part number if possible. Also is this input a 50 or 75 ohm?
    Thanks.

    Here is a link to the SMB connectors that are sold through NI: http://sine.ni.com/apps/we/nioc.vp?cid=12702〈=US.
    The minus input of the PXI-4472 connects to ground through a 50ohm resistor. Impedence matching is usually only important when preventing reflection of high-frequency signals, and with this board all high-frequencies will be filtered out with the anti-alias filters.

  • Where can I find a 17" desktop anti-glare filter for my iMac?

    I checked a couple of sites that sell anti-glare filters. I'm trying to find one to fit my widescreen 17" iMac, however, both sites charged exorbitant prices, one $80, another $100. I remember ten years ago I was able to buy an anti-glare filter for my old Windows PC, but for some reason, neither the Apple Store, nor Best Buy sell them today. I need one because for the second time in two years, I had to get new glasses as the glare from my iMac is hurting my eyesight.

    As I said, I don't think the result from putting a filter over the glass will be satisfactory, regardless of cost.
    You may want to find an external matte screen digital (DVI) LCD that you find comfortable to look at, and connect it to your iMac as a second display. Then set System Preferences Displays pane so that it is your primary display (with the menu bar and dock on it). Put that display in front of you, with the iMac off the right as the secondary display. You can still use it (as you desktop extension); hopefully the "glare" will be less of a problem if you are not staring at it constantly. You can go up to 1920x1200 resolution for an external digital display, which is a typical 23 or 24-inch (measured diagonally) widescreen LCD display. I use my iMac that way, with an external display (that I really like) as my primary display and the iMac to the right as the secondary display. Note: It's to the right because putting it to the left blocks the optical drive.
    Alternately, if the iMac is in good shape, you can sell it and put the proceeds toward a new Mac mini, and get a display that is comfortable for you.

  • Anti-relay filter configuration issues

    Configuration issues with the anti-relay filter in Messaging Server 4.1x.
    The following information addresses common questions about configuration issues
    with the anti-relay filter in Messaging Server 4.1x:<BR>
    <P>
    <OL>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    What is the difference between the delivery
    and submission
    options?<BR>
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    The submission option
    allows specified users to send email to any email address in the world.
    These users are typically internal users.
    <P>
    The delivery option
    allows specified users to receive email from anybody. These users
    are also typically internal users.
    <P>
    A standard filter will appear something as follows:<BR>
    <P>
    # This is the anti-relay config file written by Jay at iPlanet
    # The first section sets default conditions
    resolvehostnames:0
    useauthinfo:0
    advertiseauthinfo:1
    # This section sets domains to be delivered to by anybody
    delivery:*@my.domain.com
    # This section sets domains that can send any place
    submission:129.12.4.*
    <P>
    <P>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    The delivery
    option works properly. However, why doesn't the
    submission option
    appear to be allowing emails from specified users to pass through?
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    The problem with the submission behavior could be due to the setting of the
    the resolvehostnames
    parameter. If this parameter is turned on
    (resolvehostnames:1),
    then <I>all</I> entries in this configuration file must be fully qualified
    host names. Although wildcards will work, you cannot specify IP
    addresses with this configuration setting.
    <P>
    <P>
    <LI><B>Question:</B><BR>
    Is it possible to allow people outside of my network to connect to the server
    and send mail out?
    <P>
    <B>Answer:</B><BR>
    Yes. To allow outside users to connect to the server and send mail
    to any address, without granting the same privilege to the rest of the world,
    activate the authenticated SMTP portion of the filter via the
    useauthinfo option.
    Setting this parameter to "1" (i.e., useauthinfo:1
    ) will require a user who is not in a
    submission address and who is attempting to send email to an address not in
    the delivery range to authenticate with a user ID and password.
    </OL>
    <P>
    For additional information on the anti-relay filter, please refer to the
    Messaging Server 4.1 Administrator's Guide at<BR>
    <P>
    http://docs.iplanet.com/docs/manuals/messaging/nms41/ag/ubefiltr.htm#1073677

    Prashant:
    Are you using a UBE filter to configure domain-based anti-relayinging? We had better luck with the anti-relay plug-in. There is some info on this (for 4.15) at
    http://docs.sun.com/source/816-6044-10/ubefiltr.htm#1069973
    You have to enable the plug-in using configutil, per the above. The anti-relay plug-in is controlled by antirelay.conf. Be aware that the pattern matching rules are very limited, and not well documented. Fortunately, the source code to the plug-in is included, and you can see what it is doing. To pass the tests we had to add a hard-coded test for a "%" in the source and recompile:
    *** antirelay.c.orig Thu Oct 31 04:42:13 2002
    --- antirelay.c Thu Oct 31 04:22:07 2002
    *** 934,939 ****
    --- 934,940 ----
    * Weight must be non-zero to begin with so that matches on just "*"
    * will work.
    + if( strchr(text,'%') != NULL ) return ABORT;
    weight = TRUE;
    for ( ; *p; text++, p++) {
    if (*text == '\0' && p != '')
    Not a really elegant hack, but we didn't need a fully functional regex engine.

  • How could I route 20 channals via a PXI-2501 to ch0 on a PXI-4472

    I would like to use a PXI-4472 card to scan 20 signals. For this purpose I have a PXI-2501 which can be used to multiplex the 20 signals to, say, ch0 on the PXI-4472. I would like to know how can I scan each channel with a sampling freq of 1000S/s? Is it possible to synchronize the sampling and the switching?

    Ali,
    It will not be possible to hardware time the two boards due to the oversampling of the 4472. There are no hardware passed signals present that would correctly align the switch with the individual sampling of the 4472. As a result, it would be necessary to do this in software...Switch, take readings from the 4472, Switch, etc.
    Regards,
    Chris D
    NI Applications Engineer

  • Can we disable the anti-alias option for the quick selection tool?

    Can we disable the anti-alias option for the quick selection tool?
    I can deselect it with the magic wand but not with the quick selection. Any ideas?
    thanks,
    Dominik

    I don't think you can, but in the refine edge dialog you can use the contrast setting to get rid of most of the anti-alias.
    MTSTUNER

  • Jagged edge of Smart Object in PS CC. Anti-alias is disabled.

    I created a rectangle shape in PS and make it as Smart Object. I get jagged edged Smart Object when I do rotate, skew or perspective it.
    Someone suggested that turning on the anti-alias feature in the option bar would solve this issue. However, When I do free transform Smart Object, the anti-alias feature is diabled.
    Has anyone experienced this kind of issue and found the solution?
    Thanks

    Thanks for the help. Your suggestion would be work when I use shapes in Smart Object, however, what I am trying to do is to create a shape or any object and make it Smart Object as a container. Objects in Smart Object can be anything.
    Image Interpolation setting in PS Preference is Bicubic. I tried with Bicubic automatic but I had a same result. Also I tried with raster graphics, but it still seemed jagged.
    The line looks Jagged
    Here's another example.
    Can anyone help with this?
    Thanks!

  • Anti alias and Use device font not why is that not working?

    I am editing a flash template that I have and I know
    about the anti alias setting and I went through all the text boxes and set them to use device fonts and they all seem to b
    e working except for the sliding text boxes, see attached images that show the sliding box (the gray color) and the text box behind it, when I drill down to the text box it is set to use device fonts already but when I enter my text it does not show all the letters (the W A and V for example are missing) I know that is caused by the Antialias setting but I am unable to find what is set to that in this sliding box, what am I missing? I am a very novice user so please be as detailed as you can in you answer, I can provide any information needed. Thank s in advance.
    I am using CS10

    I had the same issue. They say that because TRC Sri Lanka haven't registered IPad or apple as a safe product. That means the IMEI of apple products will not match with srilankan regulatory specifications. But this issue will be solved in near future. Please contact telecommunications and regulatory bord for details. Dialog axiata can't help.

  • "Anti-alias" greyed out when free-transforming smart objects.

    While resizing smart objects, I noticed that the anti-aliasing was  very contrasting and not smooth enough for my purposes. I realized that  if I rasterized the smart object before resizing, the anti-aliasing was  better. I then noticed that there was a setting when free-transforming  smart objects called "anti-alias." However, I am unable to activate it  as it is greyed out. So, here's two questions:
    1) Is there a way to make the anti-aliasing for smart objects the same as that of rasterized objects?
    2) Is there a way to activate that "anti-alias" setting when free-transforming smart objects?
    Thanks in advance for any help you can provide

    On top of what Zeno Bokor wrote that while your doing the transform your viewing a quick scaled preview not the actual transformation you wrote
    The SOs I'm talking about are bitmap images I made into SOs to be able to resize and edit without destructive changes, not imported vector graphics from AI.
    You did not state how you made the bitmap images  into smart object.   If you just converted a layer you had been working on into a smart object some damage may have already been done to the bitmap image.  You might  get better results if you started out with a smart object layer to begin with by using ACR open as smart object option or by placing your camera jpeg images into your document as starting points.

  • Need advice on best way to acquire multiple vibration waveforms from a PXI-4472 board

    I'm using a PXI-4472 board to acquire vibration data from 8 proximity probes, each with different scaling. Confused as to best approach to achieve this given all the options with MAX, LabView and its Sound & Vibration toolset scaling. Reading other posts, it appears that 24 bit acquisition also requires some special treatment.
    This acquisition needs to be done continuously.
    As an additional side note, I will eventually need to synchronize these channels with the channels on 2 other 4472 boards.
    Any advice on how to use MAX in combination with LabView's AI CONFIG, START, READ, CLEAR and scaling
    for this application would be greatly appreciated.
    All the best,
    Hunter

    Hello Hunter --
    In regards to your questions...
    For scaling, I would recommend using either MAX or the Sound and Vibration Toolset (SVT) scaling, but not both together. The SVT is a bit more flexible, and in general I prefer that. One other thing to keep in mind about MAX is that virtual channels for accelerometers and microphones provide an option to control IEPE excitation, but in fact this can only be set from LabVIEW for the 4472.
    24 bit acquisition does not require any special treatment if you are only reading the scaled (i.e. voltage or engineering unit) data. If you use the binary array option for AI read, you will only receive the top 16 bits.
    If you use the SVT scaling, you should not worry about MAX at all. If you you do define virt
    ual channels in MAX for scaling, you should simply wire a channel array with those channel names into AI Config. Other than this, what you do in MAX should not change how you write the LabVIEW code.
    Please see the attached example for synchronizing PXI-4472s.
    Hope this helps!
    Bryan
    Attachments:
    PXI_4472_Continuous_Synchronized_AI.vi ‏156 KB

  • Anti-alias in Motion

    Hi... is there a filter in Motion for Anti-alias as in FCP... I can't locate it??
    I'm doing an awards show and using motion to create a 3D comp from supplied still pictures. I've re-sized the pictures so they are not too big.. but I'm getting ugly aliasing issues... which results it interlace flicker...
    How do you guys get around aliasing issues in Motion..???
    Cheers

    Aliasing usually doesn't cause flicker. Sounds like you've got simple issues from trying to resolve single-pixels features or lines into an interlaced project. If you cannot redo the photos, you're going to add a bit of blur, probably 2 or 3 pixels. That's really all anti-aliasing does anyway, adds some interpolation between adjacent pixels, effectively adding a bit of blurt, and the result is an illusion of more detail.
    bogiesan

Maybe you are looking for