Setting Time of Day users can access the system

This has probably been asked and answered before but please bear with me, I'm new ...
Is there a parameter that can be set to limit the time of day that users can login to the system?

Hi,
an option is to shutdown the user related services (like the report processing servers) using O/S scripts for a given time period.
Regards,
Stratos

Similar Messages

What is the "best" way to configure iTunes on an iMac with personal user acounts so each user can access the media library but sync devices on their personal user account?

I am trying to determine the best way to set up our imac so each user account can access the same media (songs, movies etc.) through itunes and also back up and manage their personal devices under their own personal user account. There are 4 users on our iMac. Me, my wife, and our 2 children. We have built an extensive library of music/media together using the same iTunes store account. I would like to establish a seperate apple id and iTunes store account for each of us going forward but have the ability for each of us to share our purchases. What is the best way to configure our system and devices in order to allow shared access to media and at the same time allow for individual management of devices including contacts, apps, photos, etc. Please help, I would like to do this once!
Thank you in advance!

OK, seeing as no-one replied (presumably because a lot of this information is on the forums in bits elsewhere) here's how I've got on so far.
Applications - just went through them. About the only one I needed was my media server app. Just downloaded and re-installed, had a quick look back though my email to find the license key and it all went on fine. Installation never seemed quite right on my old machine so solved that problem too.
Movies - New iMovies just copied across the clips and projects into their respective folders. Seems to have worked but haven't checked it all that thoroughly. Some duplicate footage here but I can trim this out at some point when I get a chance to go through here.
Documents - Just copied these across.
Photos - used an app called iPhoto Library Manager. You can download for free but have to pay to use the part that consolidates your libraries. Possibly if I was willing to spend a bit more time I could have got away without using this but given I didn't know the state of my different libraries and just how many duplicates I had this was too much of a convenience to ignore. Also got my library into a state where I can now spend a few hours organising it a bit better with Faces / Events etc.
Not attempted Music or iPhone sync yet as been stuck trying to solve a problem with my power adapter.

Check User Can Access the site collection Are Not?

Hi All
I have some requirement to check user can access site are not through powershell?
Recently we done migration from 2010 to 2013 SP after that i got some problem some users can not access site but this user have permission in sp 2010 site .
Regarding this i need to check specific user can loing or Access the site collection are not. using powershell
Some one said impersonate user we can check user can open the web are not but i don't know this impersonate.
Please help me guys....

Hi,
You can check the permission for specific user with powershell. Here is the link. Hope this will help.

2 users can access the same record

Hi all,
I have 2 users: Sale person and his assistant, they are given the same role as Sales. Both have ability to create a new record and access each other record.
How do I create such type of user and which privillege should grant for them?
Thank you
HP

Hi HP,
You can achieve this by creating the groups. You can add user to the group and whenever any user from that group will create a record; all other user by default will get full access to the records. you can have more then one group. But one user can be added to one group only. This grouping will not only allow them to share the records but also allow them to share their calendar by default, hence better synchronization while working together.
Below are the steps of creating the Groups
1. Go to Admin - Company Administration - Enable "Group sharing" feature
2. Go to admin - User Management - Public sharing group - create group
3. Create group and add users to the group
Note -
1. the records was created before enabling group will not add users of group to the record team
2. one of the group user should be the owner of the record
3. After enabling group feature, if you want to remove any of the user from team of any particular record, you can do that. Or if you want to add any user, you can also add to the team of that particular record.
If you find any problem in that, Please feel free to ask
All the best
Nisman

Any user can block the system

We have a Sunfire 6800 and Solaris 8.
I found out that any user can use up all available semaphores and shared segments, system wide.
Then system enters to unstable situation, which many important processes fail.
To resolve this situation, one can use ipcs command and take back reserved memories and semaphores from that "user"...
But this is after something happens.
To avoid something happens, do you know a method or a tool in Solaris 8 or 9 to restrict usage of semaphores and shared segments for each user or group of users?

Hi, thanks for your answers and advices.
But:
In those documents I am not able to find the answer of my question.
I am a Unix guy but not Solaris specialist yet. With those parameters,
I could only see the possibility of increasing or decreasing system wide
availability of semap's and shm's. But this won't stop any user
to use up all.
I found this vulnerability in the acceptance tests of our new Sunfire platform.
Sun engineer wasn't interested in and told me that I can disable
any Unix server like this (I don't know I haven't tried it in another).
But I found that denial of services in Solaris machine (8 cpu, 8 gb)
was extremely easy.
What I think is, there should be something to limit semaps and shm's per user, not per process or system wide. I could not believe the otherwise.

Can users who accessed the system via the ITS be identified?

Dear experts,
I wondered if there is any SAP system table which provides the information that a certain logged-in user has connected to the SAP-system via the ITS. I couldn't find anything and I've also been searching the SDN forums for that information in vain.
Thanks in advance for your help
cheers
Andreas
P.S.: In case this should be of any interest in order to answer the question:
R/3 4.7 Enterprise / SAP_BASIS Release 620 Patchlevel 0063

Hi Andreas,
Cristiano is right here. The Access.log will show you the required information in an ITS 6.20 environment
See the help.sap.com section: [Access Logs |http://help.sap.com/saphelp_webas630/helpdata/eN/32/1166d6f97811d1801d00c04fadbf76/frameset.htm]
Regards,
Oisin

Windows Users can access shares but Macs Can't

Running 10.8 on the server and here is the below problem I am having
1. Windows users can access the file shares read/write (even though they create permissions wrong, another day to takle that since I already tried ACL)
2. Macs running 10.8 and Mavericks
     Open the server in finder on a user machine. Can sometimes see the two share folders. Other times just get the spinning wheel.
     Now if you are so brave to click on the folder then finder will spin forever.
     It locks finder up so hard that you can't shut down the machine without holding the power button. Other programs will run just fine, it only affects finder.
I tried connecting from the mac with smb:// to see if it is an AFP issue but it just sits on connecting forever.
I looked through the logs and don't see anything. But my knowledge of logs is terrible.
Any help would be great.
Thanks
Thom

Running 10.8 on the server and here is the below problem I am having
1. Windows users can access the file shares read/write (even though they create permissions wrong, another day to takle that since I already tried ACL)
2. Macs running 10.8 and Mavericks
     Open the server in finder on a user machine. Can sometimes see the two share folders. Other times just get the spinning wheel.
     Now if you are so brave to click on the folder then finder will spin forever.
     It locks finder up so hard that you can't shut down the machine without holding the power button. Other programs will run just fine, it only affects finder.
I tried connecting from the mac with smb:// to see if it is an AFP issue but it just sits on connecting forever.
I looked through the logs and don't see anything. But my knowledge of logs is terrible.
Any help would be great.
Thanks
Thom

How can I restrict more then one user to access the table?

Hi !
I have a problem and two solutions and I am a bit confused as to
which one is the best one and/or can there be any better way of
handling the problem ?
Problem : I have to update a key field of a table when I update
it in the form 5.0 screen. I am basically doing a maintenance of
a table and if a certain field is updated then the change has to
be reflected in two more tables. But the issue is that the field
is a part of the key in those two tables. So all I can think of
is that I need to insert new set or rows for that new value of
the field and delete the old set of records for old values of
the field.
There are two ways of doing it;
1.One option can be to explicitely define two cursors separately
and fetch the values in them one by one and then insert the new
records and then delete the old records in both the tables. This
I feel will be a cumbersome process both in terms of processing
time and the coding.
2.Second option I was thinking can be to create two flat tables
(without keys) and insert the values in them and update the
changed field there and then insert the rows in the respective
tables. Delete the old records in the main tables and delets the
records in these flat tables. This is a bit more faster and
easier to predict and code. This seems to be a better option for
me.
Any comments on these ?
In both the cases I was thinking of making some provision so
that more then one person can't update the table simultaneously.
Since if there are more then one persons doing the processing
then some inconsistency might creep into the whole process.
This is easier to do in the second process as if I check the
data in the flat tables and if there is some data then I can
presume that some one is doing the processing and I can ask the
other person to hold for a while. But in this case how can I
stop more then two people to simultaneously check for the empty
table and start inserting the record ?
I was just thinking of having a sepatare table having only one
field and this will be a key field and as the process begins the
process will insert a fix value say 'Y' in the key field and at
the end of the process the record will be deleted and this way
we can restrict the user to access the process more then one at
a time..? Since you can't have same value of the key in a table
more then once.
Any better way of handling it will be deeply appreciated.
How about locking the table at the begining and releasing the
lock at the end ? Will there be any issue in that? since I am
inserting and deleting the rows in the same transaction.
Comments welcome,
Shobhit
null

How about performing the update IN the database using a stored
procedure?
By using non-database fields on your form to get the
information, you can then call the procedure in the database to
perform the updates. If an error occurs in the procedure you
rollback, if necessary, and send a message or status back to the
form. If it succeeds you might wish to commit and then re-
execute the form's query -- using either the original key values
or the new key values...
null

How we can lock No more than one user can use the table at a single time

Hi Abapers,
0) which function modules to lock & unlock a table.
1) When you execute the program, we can check if there is any lock on this table. If yes, the user should be able to only view the table contents and not modify.
2) If there is no lock, then lock the table and go into change mode.
3) On exiting from the program, unlock the table using the function module.
4) more than one user can't modify the table just display.
Note: If there is any lock, display message saying table is locked.
Plz help me for this requirement.
Thanks
Nani

Hello Nani
Have a look at the lock object EMMARAE (Lock MARA and MARM/MAKT exclusively) in transaction SE11.
Inspect the F1 help for field Lock mode:
DE ENQMODE
Short Text
 Lock mode
Definition
 Defines how to synchronize table record access by several users.
The following modes exist:
 Exclusive lock
 The locked data can be read or processed by one user only. A request
 for another exclusive lock or for a shared lock is rejected.
 Shared lock
 Several users can read the same data at the same time, but as soon
 as a user edits the data, a second user can no longer access this
 data. Requests for further shared locks are accepted, even if they
 are issued by different users, but exclusive locks are rejected.
 Exclusive but not cumulative lock
 Exclusive locks can be requested by the same transaction more than
 once and handled successively, but an exclusive but not cumulative
 lock can only be requested once by a given transaction. All other
 lock requests are rejected.
If you want to lock a standard table search whether the table is used in lock objects (Where-Used-List). If it is a customer table you have to create your own lock object (including two function modules: one for enqueuing and the other for dequeuing).
The lock modules can be found in menu GoTo -> Lock Modules.
Given these lock modules the logic should be quite clear after starting the program:
1. Request lock -> if successful, continue in Change mode; -> if failed, continue in Display mode
2. Before leaving the report remove lock (note: no problem if no lock has been set in the beginning).
Regards
Uwe

Start recording video at a set time of day and off at a set time of day, and or can start rec video when motion detected, till no motion detected for a set period

is there an app for iphone which can be set to start recording video at a set time of day and off at a set time of day, and or can start rec video when motion detected, till no motion detected for a set period. basically someone is vandalising my vehicle and i really really want to catch the mongrel
thanks for any suggestions

Nope.

How to make more than one person can access the database at one time

how to make more than one person can access the database at one time

Please post further f'up's in the Access forum.
In short: for different reasons it is best practice that each user gets its own local copy of the database. This means that you need to split it into a front-end which only consists of the forms, queries, reports etc. Everything which doesn't need to be
shared. And a back-end, which only stores the data.
Take also a look at Allen Browne's article:
Split your Access database into data and application.
When you've splitted your database, you may often consider to use SQL Server as back-end. Here you may read Armen Stein's
The Best of Both Worlds: Access-SQL Server Optimization.

Since I have multiple users of my itunes account, is it possible to redeem a giftcard where only myiphone can access the redeemed money?

Since I have multiple users of my itunes account, is it possible to redeem a giftcard where only my iphone can access the redeemed money?

Yes, you can use another server for .ibooks format. You can also directly email it if your system can take the size.

When I try to access my online bank account thru Firefox, the session times out. This is on a new Macbook Pro. On my old Macbook Pro I can access the site.

When I try to access my online bank account thru Firefox, the session times out. This is on a new Macbook Pro. On my old Macbook Pro I can access the site. I know it is probably something in settings but cannot figure it out.

Hello,
'''Try Firefox Safe Mode''' to see if the problem goes away. [[Troubleshoot Firefox issues using Safe Mode|Firefox Safe Mode]] is a troubleshooting mode that temporarily turns off hardware acceleration, resets some settings, and disables add-ons (extensions and themes).
'''If Firefox is open,''' you can restart in Firefox Safe Mode from the Help menu:
* Click the menu button [[Image:New Fx Menu]], click Help [[Image:Help-29]] and select ''Restart with Add-ons Disabled''.
'''If Firefox is not running,''' you can start Firefox in Safe Mode as follows:
* On Windows: Hold the '''Shift''' key when you open the Firefox desktop or Start menu shortcut.
* On Mac: Hold the '''option''' key while starting Firefox.
* On Linux: Quit Firefox, go to your Terminal and run ''firefox -safe-mode'' (you may need to specify the Firefox installation path e.g. /usr/lib/firefox)
When the Firefox Safe Mode window appears, select "Start in Safe Mode".
;[[Image:SafeMode-Fx35]]
'''''If the issue is not present in Firefox Safe Mode''''', your problem is probably caused by an extension, theme, or hardware acceleration. Please follow the steps in the [[Troubleshoot extensions, themes and hardware acceleration issues to solve common Firefox problems]] article to find the cause.
''To exit Firefox Safe Mode, just close Firefox and wait a few seconds before opening Firefox for normal use again.''
When you figure out what's causing your issues, please let us know. It might help others with the same problem.

How do you configure the iMac so separate users can access each other's files, especially iPhoto and iTunes? I need to be able to transfer media between two users and not just gain limited access using 'share'.

How do you configure the iMac so separate users can access each other's files, especially iPhoto and iTunes? I need to be able to transfer media between two users and not just gain limited access using 'share'.

See Terence Devlin's thorough explanation here.

Last time a deleted user accessed the system

Is there any way of finding out when a user that has been deleted from the system access the system?
I use STAT for active ID's but this does not work for inactive ID's.
Thanks,
Chris

Hi Rakesh,
Report RSUSR200 reads from USR02, which only pertains to active users.
>
Rakesh Kulkarni wrote:
> I found KRNL Tcode and SAPMSYST program against a user who was deleted on say 01 feb 08 .
> My question is wthr by checking KRNL tcode and SAPMSYST program against a user confirms that user was deleted on that date.?
USH02 does not tell you the date when the user was deleted. It only tells the last time the user logged in the system.
USH04 will tell when was the user deleted. Since a user cannot login to the system once deleted, USH04 timestamp will be greater than USH02. i.e. the user was deleted after the last login.
Hope this clarifies
Thank you
Abhishek

Setting Time of Day users can access the system

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for