Setting up BCM 7.0.6.100 Internet Chat Client

Hi, everyone!
I've been struggling with a weird error message when setting up the proof-of-concept chat client for BCM 7.0.6.100
What I did is set up a fresh system from scratch and configure it just enough to conduct tests. After that I installed the chat client onto the same machine.
Now the problem is that whenever I rty to initiate a new chat I get the following error message:
13Chat Server not availablefalse
System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapException: com.sap.bcb.common.SoapException
   at ChatPortal.IciContainerService.subscribe(String appUrl, String appId, String channelType, String containerId) in d:\bcm_70_sp6_p1_source\bcm_7\source\source\ExtAppIntegration\WebServices\ChatPortal\IciContainerService.asmx.cs:line 99
This is a copy-paste from the exact message. Chat server actually is available and I'm pretty much out of ideas what to try to fix.
Has anyone any ideas on what to try next to get the chat working or better yet does anybody know the exact solution?
Thanks in advance,
Jaanus

Jaanus,
can you reach this page?
If "Yes", and after clicking "Submit" you get an error message, check contact filed, e-mail ([email protected] on the screenshot) address must be the same as you assigned to a chat queue.
BR,
Anton.

Similar Messages

  • Message uses a character set that is not supported by the internet service

    Does any one have any advice on how to fix this problem?
    E-mails sent from my iphone 3G periodically arrive in an unreadable form at the recipient. The body of the e-mail has been replaced with the message "This message uses a character set that is not supported by the internet service...." The problem e-mails also include an attachment that contains an unformatted text file containing the original message surrounded by what appears to be lots of formatting data that is displayed as gibberish.
    This occurs sometimes, but not always, even with the same recipients. I am sending e-mail through a G-mail account that is configured on the iphone using IMAP. I have tried the gmail account to use the two available formatting options for mail, but neither fixes the problem.
    I have also upgraded to 2.01 and restored a few times without impact.

    Hi,
    I got somewhat similar problem with special charecters(German umlaud �,�,�..).
    I create a file with java having special charecters in it. Now if I open this file I am able to view the special charecters in it.But If I attach this file send it using following code then receiver can not see the umlaud charecters in it.They get replaced by _ or ?
    MimeBodyPart mbp2 = new MimeBodyPart();
    FileDataSource fds = new FileDataSource(fileName);
    mbp2.setDataHandler(new DataHandler(fds));
    mbp2.setFileName(output.getName());
    Multipart mp = new MimeMultipart();
    mp.addBodyPart(mbp2);
    msg.setContent(mp);
    Transport.send(msg);
    From you message it looks like you are able to send the mail attachment correctly(by preserving special charecters).
    Can you tell me what might be wrong in my code.
    I appriciate your efforts in advance.
    Prasad

  • How do I set up my iMac g4 to the Internet?

    How do I set up my iMac g4 to the Internet?

    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106748 Mac OS X: Troubleshooting a dial-up/PPP Internet connection 
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=106749 Troubleshooting a cable modem, DSL, or LAN Internet connection

  • Disable set as background from right click in internet explorer 8,9,10,11 by GPO in Win Serv 2008 R2

    Hi.
    How to disable ''set as background'' from right click in internet explorer 8,9,10,11 by GPO in Win Serv 2008 R2.
    People in my domain can set their background by right click in the pics on their IE, I enabled by GPO a wallpaper by default in ''Administrative Templates > Desktop > Desktop > Desktop Wallpaper''  and I enable too the  ''Administrative Templates
    > Control Panel > Personalization > Prevent changing desktop background'' at login people have the corporative Desktop but they can change by IE. What can I do? thanks.
    <u5:p></u5:p>

    Hi,
    I test this issue, actually, in IE 11, the option "set as backgroud" is grayed out after I applied policy  Administrative Templates > Control Panel > Personalization > Prevent changing desktop background, but seems not suitable for
    other versions of IE.
    You can try other solutions listed in the similiar thread
    How to disable the "Set as Desktop background"?<o:p></o:p>
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/889447df-8452-44b4-bcdf-bf217b75ce6f/how-to-disable-the-set-as-desktop-background?forum=windowssteadystate
    Regards<o:p></o:p>
    Yolanda
    TechNet Community Support

  • Setting up a few more things 100%

    Im stuck at 100% everytime I update and I have to roll back previous version of windows every single time, how can I stop this from happening again?

    Hi RocketSashimi,
    What is the current situation?
    If the new build still could not be installed, please uninstall any 3rd-party Antivirus software if installed, after that, check if we could install the new build again. A similar thread for reference:
    Stuck at "Setting up a few more things
    100%" when upgrading to build 9860
    Or
    We may consider to do a clean install with the newly Windows 10 9879 ISO, which is download available from the following link:
    Download Windows Technical Preview November Update
    http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/preview-iso-update?os=win10
    Enterprise version:
    http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/evalcenter/evaluate-windows-technical-preview-for-enterprise
    Best regards
    Michael Shao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Stuck at "Setting up a few more things 100%" when upgrading to build 9860

    Hello everyone,
    I'm currently running Windows 10 Technical Preview, installed from the setup.exe (so not from a bootable disc/USB-stick), which does work better than I expected. Of course there are many bugs and other problems under the hood, but so far I haven't found
    big issues so far.
    Unfortunately, when I try to install the latest build - build 9860 - it keeps hanging at 'Setting up a few more things 100%'. That's really strange, since '100%' should mean it's actually done. I've done about five attempts, none of them resulted in anything
    better. After a few attempts, I thought I had to install some updates through Windows Update first, so I did. But after that, installing build 9860 still didn't want to install properly.
    Anyone who can help me with this? 
    Just some key information about the notebook I'm using, in it's necessary:
    ASUS N56VB-S4061H
    2.4 GHz quad Intel Core i7-3630QM
    6 GB RAM
    NVIDIA GeForce GT740M

    Hi DutchTom18,
    You can try uninstall anti-virus software that has been installed after installation of Windows 10.
    Alex Zhao
    TechNet Community Support

  • Internet Based Client Updates

    Hi,
    We have SCCM 2012 R2 installed, with IBCM enabled. These clients are able to switch between intranet and internet fine.
    Updates work internally and externally fine too. We only have 1 SUP configured for intranet access only, and the Internet facing server is there as a DP and MP for clients to check in and report in etc. This enables us to see if any machines have viruses
    and what software they have installed etc
    Now, the problem...
    Our mobile workforce all use aircards with a data limit. We need to be able to report on these, and for them to get updates, but only from our DPs, NOT from windows updates, which is what happens by default when a client switches to internet based.
    This is an extract from a technet article:
    New in System Center 2012 Configuration Manager, when you have a software update point that is configured to accept connections from the Internet, Configuration Manager Internet-based clients on the Internet always scan against this software update point,
    to determine which software updates are required. However, when these clients are on the Internet, they first try to download the software updates from Microsoft Update, rather than from an Internet-based distribution point. Only if this fails, will they then
    try to download the required software updates from an Internet-based distribution point. Clients that are not configured for Internet-based client management never try to download the software updates from Microsoft Update, but always use Configuration Manager
    distribution points.
    We need to able to turn this off, so they do not get updates from windows updates and consume all their data allowance.
    On our SCCM 2007 server, we simply added a SUP internally, an internet facing DP/MP and when they were on the intranet they got updates and when they were on the internet they did not as we did not distribute the packages to that DP, but got them the next
    time they were at one of our sites...
    We need to replicate this functionality.
    Can you advise how to do this in SCCM 2012?
    Many thanks

    You are welcome to file a design change request (DCR) on connect.microsoft.com.
    Are these system Win 8.1? If so, then your scenario actually shouldn't be an issue because Win 8.1 can detect metered connections and ConfigMgr client settings can be set so that they do not use metered data connections.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

  • Internet Based Clients via F5 Big-IP load balancer

    Hi Guys,
    Please help with below question....
    We have the requirement to support internet based clients...we have a proper MS PKI infra in-place. The SCCM design is like this : Primary Server is on corporate LAN and I have attached a site system server which is in DMZ network ( Say ABC Zone ). Now as
    per my knowledge DMZ SCCM Site System server should be accessible to clients over internet connection and to make this happen, FQDN of site systems that support Internet-based client management must be registered as host entries on public DNS servers.
    Now the twist is... as per our company policy we cannot make that SCCM Site system server directly available on internet... Network team is saying there is another DMZ zone ( Say PQR Zone ) where they have F5 Big-IP load balancer which are internet facing
     ( HTTPS ). Now they are saying that our SCCM clients should hit those devices and then internally re-direct to our SCCM site system server kept in ABC Zone.
    VeriSign certificates will be used to encrypt in-coming network traffic to the F5 Big-IP Load Balancers configured as ADFS reverse proxy servers residing in the PQR Zone.
    Is this scenario supported ? Please let me know what alternates we can have to avoid our SCCM server not directly facing to internet.
    Thanks,
    Sam 

    Hi Jason,
    Thanks for your quick and prompt reply as always. My answers in BOLD...
    First a question, you said "we have a proper MS PKI infra in-place". Does this mean you have a CDP exposed to the Internet or is an OCSP responder Internet accessible? If not, you will have issues although this can be overcome by disabling CRL checking
    on the clients, that does lower your security posture. With "Proper PKI infra" I meant... they have if available already and supporting SCCM 2007 environment with it...but not supporting internet based clients in SCCM 2007. They implemented PKI there
    just for better security. At present PKI CRL server is on internal network and the assumption is that, machines will also VPN-in the corporate network for CRL and certificate renewal when required...at some point in time.
    To your real question here, is the F5 bridging or can it be set to pass-through? Pass-through is generally easier. Ultimately though, ConfigMgr doesn't care as long as the traffic gets to the site system hosting the roles. The main difference will be with the
    certificates used by each component. With bridging, the F5 will terminate the SSL traffic and then initiate a new SSL stream to the site system.
    This is all pretty transparent to ConfigMgr and the client as long as the certs used are configured with the proper SANs and the F5 properly passes the traffic along.
    I don't think Network team would allow 'pass-through' and would go for 'bridging' option. Can you please let me know the steps I need to follow to configure bridging in-between F5 Balancers and SCCM site system server...bottom line is...our SCCM clients
    should be able to communicate to our site server to get the MP, SUP and DP service. I'm not clear with the statement I underlined in above para.
    Is using a third-party product like an F5 supported by Microsoft. No not explicitly. They rarely support anyone else's technology. Is the scenario in general supported? Yes, however Microsoft only provides guidance for doing so in conjunction with TMG/ISA.
    If you search the web for "internet based client management bridge" you'll get lots of hits. Most (if not all) will be for ConfigMgr 2007 but they are still applicable.
    Not able to find much fruitful data... Can you please provide me with good links which would help me clear this technically.
    Now, if your F5 is set to pass-through, then there's not much extra to do at all assuming the traffic is routed properly
    THANKS AGAIN for your help in this regard.
    Sam

  • Internet Base Client Setup

    I'm trying to figure out what is needed for Internet Base Client Management. After researching, it looks like I need to create a certificate from a server. Would this be the SCCM server I'm creating this from or an Enterprise CA Server that we would have
    to stand up? And do I have to put my SCCM Server on the DMZ also? I'm planning on setting up one primary site server to manage internal and external clients. Also, anyone have a good step by step tutorial that I can use for IBCM from start to finish? I've
    never dealth with CA's/PKI's. Thanks for the help.

    Hi,
    Please refer to the link below:
    SCCM 2012 Internet based client management
    http://www.systemcenterdudes.com/internet-based-client-management/
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Internet based client activity

    I am setting up clients for internet based client management.  We were already have PKI certs for all of our clients.  The client shows the connection type as currently internet, but the client activity shows inactive in the console.  Where
    would I start to trouble shoot this?

    The client indeed needs to have the information the Internet-based Management Point information. Normally the client should get that information as a policy when it's correctly communicating with a Management Point, or as a property during the client installation.
    Also, indirect it's at least one of the things that counts with the InternetEnabled property.
    My Blog: http://www.petervanderwoude.nl/
    Follow me on twitter: pvanderwoude

  • Queries regarding Internet Based Client Management (IBCM) 2012 R2

    Hi All,
    I am trying to work with IBCM, but I have few queries for which I am not able to get any proper Information from Internet. I would be really Thankful if you all can help with your advice.
    1) I will need to publish host record Internet FQDN of the Site system server, which will point to Public IP on Public DNS.
    - So If I NAT the public IP to Local SCCM server IP on firewall, will that work, or I will have to give a different Private IP?
    2) Let say I have Few workgroup machine which will be on Internet and they wont even come to office network, so in this scenario, how should I proceed.
    a. Will I be able to get Remote session of the user?
    b. Can I install SCCM client manually over the internet? if yes then what all information I will need to provide while client installation.
    c. If I use Public wild card certificate on the server, do I need to purchase Client certificate as well?
    d. If I use Internal CA certificate on the server, then I will have to install Client certificate manually on all the work group machine, I am right? can Public Certificate act as an alternative?
    e. Any other specific Port apart from 443 that need to open on firewall?
    3) Is it necessary to put the internet facing Site system server in DMZ or it is OK to use the same Site System server for Intranet and internet.
    4) Currently I have a Site System fully functional, and set to HTTP & HTTPS communication setting, For IBCM I will be moving MP and DP from HTTP to HTTPS, I want to know will there be any issue, or any other aspect that I need to take care before performing
    these steps.
    5) Currently My OS deployment, App Deployement & Software Update is working perfectly, Moving MP and DP to Https, will that effect any of the current functionality, please advise.
    Thanking in advance,
    Regards,
    Ritesh
    Thanks & Regards, Ritesh Hegde, Exchange,BPOS, FOPE, O365.

    1. Yes, the device performing the NAT will forward the traffic to the private IP of the site system. That's the whole point of NAT assuming you've configured it correctly and allowed the traffic to pass.
    2a. No, remote Control does not work for Internet based clients.
    2b. What are your expectations and what does "manually over the Internet mean"? If you are talking about client push, then technically, yes its possible, although in reality it won't work because almost everything connected on the Internet is behind
    its own NAT and firewalls that won't allow the traffic to reach the destination. Additionally, if these clients are to be Internet only (which workgroup machine must be), then they must be installed with the CCMALWAYSINF property set to true which is only
    done when manually installing the client on the system by directly initiating ccmsetup.
    2c. The certs on the clients have nothing to do with cert on the servers. All clients connecting via IBCM require their own, unique client auth cert. If you plan on purchasing these, it will get real expensive, real quick and of course remember that this
    is a recurring cost.
    2d. How else would you install any certificate? They can't magically appear on the systems particularly since they are workgroup systems.
    2e. 8531 for WSUS and 10123 for client notification.
    3. Using the same internal site system is technically fine, but I doubt your security folks would like that idea.
    4. Site Systems cannot be set to both HTTPS and HTTP. They can only be set to one or the other. Your site can accept both, but the site systems cannot. If you convert your existing/only MP and DP to HTTPS, then *all* of your clients will need their own unique
    client auth certs.
    5. Only if you don't configure things properly.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com | @jasonsandys

  • This is regarding CBMA in SAP PI 7.3.1. I have set up the alert mail using default java mail client.I do receive the alerts via mail. But my requirement is to direct all the mails to Business workplace inbox in ECC.

    This is regarding CBMA in single stack SAP PI 7.3.1. I have set up the alert mail using default java mail client.I do receive the alerts via mail. But my requirement is to direct all the alert mails to Business workplace inbox in ECC.
    So I need to set up PI to redirect mails to ECC Business workplace user inbox (sbwp). From here rules are set up & routed per distribution list.
    Please guide me how I can achieve this requirement.

    Hi,
    yes, it is a little bit different. This is the issue.....  
    But I am not sure if your links will help:
    1) /people/william.li/blog/2008/02/13/sap-pi-71-mapping-enhancements-series-using-graphical-variable
    is about a different solution. I do not need to count the number of lines of the source message.
    And the second variable is about concat line by line from unbound node to unbound node.
    My issue is:
    Souce:
    Message line (0...unbound) ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
    .    ResultLine   (1..1)
    Mapping:
    =>   ResultLine1
           ResultLine2
           ResultLine........          => into UDF to an element  (1..1) in one mapping operation.
    So that all "ResultLine"s are included.
    The result is explained in the given link for Mail attachment with UDF.
    So I am not sure how to use this thread for my issue.
    In the comments of that blog Christoph Gerber writes that the new variable feature can only handle single values.
    So it is not suitable for my purposes as I have a list of values here that needs to be moved into the target message field.
    2) http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/Java/UsingEditJavaSectioninMessageMapping
    shows where to find the button "Java section" which is not available here in 7.1
    3) /people/sap.user72/blog/2005/10/01/xi-new-features-in-sp14
    too is about the nice little button for Java Section that is no longer existing on PI 7.1 screen for mappings.  
    So my issue is: How to replace the Java section function with global variables in PI 7.1?
    Best regards
    Dirk

  • Is it possible to make an "internet" chat program?

    I have already made a chat program for a LAN, but I want to somehow make it usable over the internet. Is there a way to make the program use your internet ip, instead of your lan ip?

    Hello: I gott a similar trouble over writing an internet chat app. I have an app that works on a local server, works with a local database, i want it to work on internet, but i dont know how to do it, i also use a server app for replying client queries. I'm using sockets and i don't know how a client can works throught a LAN - proxy or router internet acces - to the app if i have to place it on a web server

  • Internet Based Clients and Native Mode

    Hi guys,
    I have a question.... We have SCCM 2007 SP2 running in mixed mode in the environment. Now we plan to support internet based clients. Here is the current Hierarchy in mixed mode.
    1 Central Server
    1 Primary Server
    3 Secondary servers under above Primary Server
    Now as the requirement is to support internet based clients and want them to support on office LAN as well when they come to the office....this is what I would be doing : ( Theoretically I know, I need the practical steps to achieve that )
    1. Get all the 3 PKI Certificates : Site Server Signing, Web Server, Client agent.
    2. Make sure all the required ports are opened in-between Intranet <->DMZ AND DMZ <-> Internet
    3. Migrate Central server from Mixed to Native Mode.
    4. Install another Primary Server on Intranet in Native mode.
    5. Create a site system server connected to newly created Native Primary Site in the DMZ zone with these roles installed : MP, SUP and DP.
    6. Re-install all the SCCM clients in the environment with the command-line so that they can be supported on both internet and intranet.
    7. Make sure internet clients are able to connect DMZ site system server via internet.
    Please let me know if I'm missing something here and let me know the practical steps to achieve this. 
    Request you not to share Microsoft technet link for the same. Please share some step-by-step practical document etc.. to achieve this.
    Thanks,
    Sam

    1. This is incorrect. You need more than a single web server cert and client cert. You need a unique server auth cert for *every* one of your systems hosting a client role like the MP, DP, and SUP. Also, you need a unique client auth cert for each and *every*
    client that may/will connect via the Internet.
    4. Standing up a whole extra site just to support IBCM is a bit overkill. It does allow you to keep your "main" primary site in mixed mode, but it does add some overhead and cost and is not technically necessary.
    6. Incorrect. You only need to reinstall clients that will be configured as "Internet-only". Intranet clients should pick up the internet facing roles via policy. You can verify this by checking locationservices.log on the clients after they are successfully
    communicating and the Internet facing roles are stood up and healthy.
    You've made no account above for the CDP or CRL checking. This is a major stumbling block for many folks.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

  • How to implement a internet radio client by j2me

    Can anyone please help me to implement a internet radio client application for mobile device which will do audio streaming while playing mp3 files?

    sazib wrote:
    Can anyone please help me Sure thing. You go first.
    [_How to ask questions the smart way_|http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html]
    db

Maybe you are looking for