Settle ment rule for MTO

Hi Gurus,
Please tell me which settelemt category and who will be a reciever for production order in MTO.
i have bit confusion.
here i got the material as a receiver in settlement.
Please clear me.
Nilesh

Hi,
Which order type you are using and which settlement profile is assigned to it. To check it, please use KOAL T Code. Now double click on Order Type and check which Settlement profile is assigned? Now to check that settlement profile go through the following path
IMG > Controlling > Internal Orders > Actual Postings > Settlement > Maintain Settlement Profiles
Click on Settlement Profile. Now check that settlement profile which is assigned to that order type.
Now check the Default Object Type. it must be MAT .
The system considering the profile from strategy ex: SD1 - Sales order profile.This settlement profile itself settlement rule is assigned for MTO.
The settlement profile assigned to order type with standard sett profile (PP01) at OK07.
Hope clears to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

  • Report on settlement profile/rule for the Process Orders ?

    Is there any report which will display settlement profile for process order or settlement rule for process order.

    Hi,
    Did you try this one: KOSRLIST_OR - Settlement Rules?
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Settle Ment Rule

    Is there any functional Module or BAPI to populate settle Rule Project system .
    we are using the BDC program to Populate the transaction
    CJ12 .We have populate huge data.
    Can anyone tell us is there any FM or BAPI do the same.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Babusankar

    Hi
    Please see some info from the following thread where I have given some input:Re: Generation of WBS Settlement Rule
    Best regards, Johan

  • Capital Project Settlement Rule for lower WBS

    Hello,
    At my present client, for Investment projects the client want to settle top level WBS to AUC and capitalise it. So ideally the cost from lower level WBS should flow to top WBS. I am using substitution to remove investment profile from lower WBS.My concern is how do I auto populate the settlement rule for lower WBS to top WBS. I am aware about settlement strategy and OSS note 211324 (however dont want to implement this note)
    The appraoch I am looking for is using "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE' BAdI . However this BADI calls for strategy and I could not maintain the required strategy (settlement to top WBS). Is there some BADI/Function module available which can be called for updating the settlement rules on lower WBS while saving or Release ? Can I make use of exits in Substitution?
    Please let me know your opinions.
    Thanks
    Sarang

    Thanks Virendra. I agrree the only approach is development. But I need to give inputs to my developer.
    We tried with BADI "WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE" but it didnt work as it calls strategy in configuration.
    So I am checking for some other options for e.g "WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE" which is called during save or Fn modules K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_FILL or K_SETTLEMENT_RULE_SAVE which I can use. This is a client requirement to create AUC only at top level n all cost to be rolled up to superior WBS n then settle to AUC.
    The other option I was thinking is of using exits thru substitution.
    What will be the best approach?
    Thanks
    Sarang

  • Automatic settlement rule for receiver 'Fixed asset' (with out IM)

    Hi Experts
    I am working with project settlement to a fixed asset.
    I have defined a selttlement profile in which, FXA is the only valid receiver.
    Please note that we do not use Investment managent and hence no automatic AUC.The predefined asset to be used for settlement.
    In this situation i am unable to generate settlement rule automatically as like the case with CTR.
    The below message is experienced.
    "Enter a distribution rule for Asset without a validity limit"
    However i have manually maintained the settlement rule with specification of appropriate asset as receiver and settled.
    In this scenario, how to ensure that the settlement rule is automatically generated, any where can we refer the fixed asset?
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi,
    Settlement rule cannot be automatically maintsined, you have to maintain manually, for example if you want to settle to fixed asset, how the system know to which fixed asset it should settle. You have to maintain settlement parameter manually.
    Regards,
    Sreekanth

  • Settlement Rule for Internal Order

    Hi All
    I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
    CAT - FXA
    Settlement Receiver - Asset
    % - 100
    Settlement type - Full
    Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
    Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
    Message no. KD042
    Diagnosis
    You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
    When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
    The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

    Hi:
            Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
    "Symptom
        1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
        2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
    Additional key words
    KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
    Cause and prerequisites
        1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
        You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
        The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
        2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
    Solution
        1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
        2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
        Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
    Regards

  • Error-M2O-Settlement rule for assembly order for item...could not be genera

    Hi,
    When I am creating Sales Order (VA01) for M2O, I am able to do the costing and copy the EK02 condition type. I have verified the the incompletion log, it indicates that document is complete.
    But while saving the sales order, the below error message is displaed:
    Settlement rule for assembly order for item 000010 could not be generated. Should the order still be saved?
                    Yes/No
    1. If No is choosen the following error message is displayed
           Error when processing Production order
          Error when processing Production order
          Message no. V1380
          Diagnosis
            A technical error has occurred. On calling up the assembly interface, exception 5 was triggered. The exceptions have the  following meanings:
    1 = External block,  2 = General error,  3 = Insufficient data for the interface,  4 = Order was not found, 5 = Update has been rejected, 6 = Final document number for Production order is not issued.  Procedure: Inform your system administrator.
    2. If Yes is choosen, it is creating Production Order without settlement rule. Able to perform GI & Gr. If I try to enter settelement rule (Settlement receiver SDI - Sales document item) in production order (CO02), the belwo error message is displayed
    "Distribution rule for Sales document item can only be created automatically Message no. KD063"
    We are using the requierement class with below details:
    Reqmts class: ZSO- for M2O
    AAC = E, Valuation = A, Settlement profile =SD1, RAKey = 000004, Assembly type = 3.
    Settlement profile contain:
    Allocation structure, PA structure, Default object type = SDI. Valid receivers: Optional -Sales Order / Prof. seg.
    If I make the Valuation field as blank in Reqmts class, there is no error while creating Sales order. And also Settelemnt rule with sales document item as receiver is successfully creating for the production order. Since the Valuation is blank in requirement class, it is Non valuated Sales order stock. All GIs & GR are non valuated
    The business requirement is it should be valuated sales order stock and the production varinaces has to be settled to Sales order. Then Sales order has to be settled to COPA.
    Need your valuable inputs to meet this requirement.
    Let me know if you need any further details.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    ADI

    Dear SAP PP Consultant ,
    What is the strategy group you are maintained in the material master ?

  • Settlement rule for Asset Under Construction not automatically generated.

    Hi Experts,
    I am working on a capital project scenario where in i configured the SAP IM and SAP PS module. i am able to create AUC at the WBS level on project release,but i am not able to generate the settlement rule for AUC automatically.
    Please suggest as to what i am missing to generate settlement rule for AUC automatically.
    Thanks,
    shiv

    i think for automatically AUC to be generated, u need to create investment profile in OITA in that u have to tick mange AUC in investment measure. & select settlement for summary settlement.
    This investment profile u need to specify in Project Profile OPSA.
    do this setting & let me know whts happen?
    ok best of luck.
    Regards,
    ANSAR

  • Settlement rule for AUC

    Dear SAP gurus,
    In AIAB, I have assigned the settlement rule for AUC asset id. However I am not able to see the settlement rule assigned in  As03. Is there any report

    Hi,
    you can see the settlement rule only in AIAB.
    regards Bernhard
    Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Jun 15, 2010 12:52 PM

  • Creation of settlement rules for WBS element

    Hi,
    Iam having problem when creating the settlement rules for WBS elements. The business goes like this.
    We have XI interface which creates the Idocs and an inbound program(customized) to process the Idocs. When the Inbound program is run the WBS elements are created and settlement rules are created for the WBS elements. The inbound program is run automatically thru batch job.
    First time when the Idocs are processed about 95% of the WBS elements have settlement rules created and for other 5% settlement rules are not created. The Idoc is in status 64. I tried reprocessing the Idoc and then the settlement rules are getting created succussfully. The problem is Iam not able to find why the Inbound program is not processing succusfully when its run first time but works when reprocessed.
    I appreciate if anyone can send their views.
    Best Regards
    SK

    Hi!
    You might set the processing to check not only once the relevant IDocs, but more times...
    Check out these programs, and set them into a batch job periodically...
    RBDMANI2
    RBDAPP01
    Regards
    Tamá

  • Automatic Generation of Settlement Rules for PM order

    Hi All,
    I am doing a maintenance orders settlement and I have the fallowing issue:
    My client has 2 types of equipment, namely vehicles and industrial equipment. Both have particular rules.
    For vehicles, we need to control all cost by an internal order
    Industrial equipment costs will be control by cost center.
    So, cost center is maintained for industrial equipment, and Settlement Order for vehicle equipment.
    I have a unique order type for which in Settlement profile I have entered Order and Cost Center as 'Settlement Optional' and default object type as CTR.
    When I create a PM order for vehicle, system cannot generate automatically the settlement rule, because in order type I have entered default object type as CTR and in equipment I just have the Settlement Order.
    But if I create a PM order for industrial equipment system create automatically the settlement rule, because cost center is maintained for industrial equipment and order type has default object type as CTR.
    In the allocation structure I have a receiver category for CTR and ORD.
    So, Could you help me how to generate automatically settlement rule for both cases without 2 order types?
    Thanks & regards,
    Hélder Nunes

    hi
    i think it is not possible to generate settlement rule based on equipment ,if you have specified the default settlement category in IMG ,it will be generated .
    check with your technical team whether user exit IWO10027 can be mapped
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • Maintain settlement rules for order category 30(Maintenance order).

    Hi Gurus,
    Can we maintain two settlement rules for an order without distribution rule?
    Eample:-  In an order there are three  different costs i.e. material cost,external labour cost and internal labour cost.We want to settle the material cost and external labour cost to Profitability segment and the internal cost to a particular GL account directly.
    Note: No distribution rule is required,because all the cost should settle directly to correspoanding heads i.e. PSG or GL.We don't want to assign  the GL# again and again for different orders in the corresponding order's  settlement rule.
    Require your valuable inputs to proceed.
    Best Regards,
    Ramakanta

    Hi Govardhan,
    If you are working in ECS, the Shopping cart will not create any follow on document in backend R/3.
    I think your Product category is 30, thats why the error says Manual reservation for order category 30 is not allowed.
    Where did you get the maintenance order? Generally maintenance order is created in the backend R/3 (Plant Maintenance) and a P.R will get generated against that order.
    Using PDP (Plan driven procurement) you can transfer that P.R to SRM and can carry out sourcing and can complete the procurement cycle.
    Can you please tell me what is your exact business requirement?
    Hope this will make you more clear.
    Clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Auto Run Program not updating Settlement Rules for few WBS elements

    Hi,
    Addition of settlement rules for OPEX WBS.
    In producion system, two jobs are running daily for generating settlement rules of WBS elements but, all WBS elements are not updating with Settlement rules.
    It is becoming a problem in the Period end while doing the settlement. Currently we are updating the settlement rule manually.
    We have investigated and found the following WBS element with Profile name  are not updating Settlement rule.
    H-U0DU0204DE-EX-J0  - HHDC01
    H-N0U00ULD01-P1-D1-W2 - 000090
    H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U0-T1-OB - HHDC01
    H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U1-W1-ON - HHDC01
    H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U2-W1-ON - HHDC01
    H-U0DU0204DE-EX-I0-E1 - HHDC01
    H-U0DU0204DE-EX-I0-B1 -HHDC01
    H-U1DU0204DE-EX-U0-W1-ON - HHDC01
    Job Names :
    ZFPD_UK_SETTLEMENT_RULE_GEN
    ZFPD_NO_SETTLEMENT_RULE_GEN
    Please suggest on this issue
    Regards

    Hi,
    I suppose these are background jobs. Usually there is an issue with background jobs that are run for a custom developed program. Not sure why that happens. Even i faced this issue with a couple of jobs in my system. I have still not found out the reason as to why this happens. There might be a possibility that these projects were being processed in the foreground by some user and hence they were omitted from the run.
    I would suggest you to consult your technical guys on this.
    Regards,
    Gokul

  • Unable to assign AUC as settlement type in settlement rule for FXA category

    Dear Experts,
    One of my requirement is that one WBS has several actual posting for AUC of different types and settle through CJ88. Investment profile is not in scope.
    To run the above scenario, i created AUC manually via AS01 of different types. When i create settlement rule manually for that WBS i can't see the settlement type "AUC" for FXA category. I can see only the settlement type of "PER and FULL". 100% settlement should be done for all AUC posted for  that WBS at the time of each period closing.
    Could you help me to resolve this issue asap?
    Regards
    Vetri

    Hi,
    To get AUC in settlement rule , you need to allow settlement at wbs level which use to be controlled in settlement profile. Also you wont find AUC but u will find fixed asset-  FXA.
    One more thing settlement rule come automatically when you run the settlement first time as captilisation. You will get the settlement rule automatically.
    Regards
    Abhishek Sinha

  • RA Settlement User Exit for Posting rules

    Hi,
    For settlement of RA data the postings rules are defined in OK8G and the same are used while running settlement CJ88 or CJ8G.
    My question is do we have a user exit which kicks in at the time of settlement and could let us change the rules for a certain set of Projects?
    OR if we could have a substitution rule in place that could kick in at the time of settlement and would pick up the rule based on a critria?
    The reason for the above question is because we are trying to settle the Projects based on two selection critira:
    a) Based on RA key i.e. for RA key A use posting rule "123" and for projects with RA key B use posting rules "456".
    b) Based on the Work in Progress ( POCI and POCS) values we need to further decide if we need to change the posting rule or use exiting one.
    If RA key = A
      use rule "123"
          else if WIP position < 0
            use rule "123"
         else use rule "456"
    End

    Ankush,
    These are the routines for validation / substitutions where in you can write your own code. Check it in SE38.
    Regards
    Sreekanth

Maybe you are looking for

  • New Session getting created(!)

              Hi All,           I am facing a wierd behavior. I have an application with a           login page(jsp). User submits his authentication details,           is authenticated in a servlet, and some of his information is           put in the se

  • Error 1015 when trying to restore old iPhone on Mac iTunes

    Hello, Recently my mom's iPhone was freezing up. She says she tried to restore it by following some sleazy directions on the internet using her PC. The phone keeps acting up, so we connect it to my MacBook Pro, which we've never connected it to befor

  • New to iMovie - Slide Show project

    I've been lurking in the iMovie discussions for a couple of months now, and I'm trying to absorb the knowledge of the community. I'm also working my way through "The Missing Manual" which is invaluable. I have two projects in mind, so I'm starting tw

  • Viewing setails of an Oracle SR on Oracle Support

    Hi, I've found an bug report on Oracle Support that seems to be for an issue that I'm experiencing. I've got the issue on a version of Oracle though that shouldn't have this issue. To verify that it is the same issue, I'd like to look at the detals o

  • Sorting with Comparator, wrong order?

    Hello, i've a string array, and every string in this array in form of "Firstname [MiddleName] LastName". After i sort the array i get "List A" below, but i expect to get "List B". All "Alp"s must be together like dictionary order, isn't it? What caus