Settle part of production order to cost center

When settling a production order, the balance of some accounts in the production order should be settled to a certain cost center (the rest of the order balance settle to material).  The requirement is to settle the balance amount while settlement rule in a production order only allows settle by percentage or amount.  Please let me know if there is any solution.  Thanks~

Hi Sharon
I dont know if this would be possbile because a Prod Order created for a Valuated Mat will always have MAT as settlement receiver
however, give a try as below
1. In your Settlement Profile - Assign a Source Structure
2. In the Source Str - Create 2 Assignments, say, 10 & 20
10 - Include all the Cost elements which should settle to Cost Center... Specify
20 - All others which should settle to MAT
3. In your allocation structure, allow both CTR/MAT as allowed receivers
4. While creating settlement rule in Prod Order - Create 2 settlement rules
a. In One settlement rule, Choose the Source Str Assignment 10 and Specify Cost Ctr as Settlement Receiver
b. In 2nd settlement rule, this will be auto generated by the system to MAT... Choose the Source Str Assgn 20 here
Br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

  • Material cost charge to Production Order from Cost Center / Work Center.

    In Production Order Environment, is it possible that goods are issued from Storage location to Cost Center / Work Center, and in turn charged to Production Orders.
    Scenario. Transformer Manufacturing.
    Production Order size : 100 Units
    Steel (Kgs) per Transformer : 3 Kgs
    Total Steel required for Production Order: 300 Kgs (100x3)
    In the process of manufacturing of a Transformer Steel or Core winding is the first process step.
    Even though the Steel required for above said Production Order is 300 Kgs, the minimum issuable lot size from stores is 2000 Kgs.
    Is it possible in SAP ECC 6.0 that the Steel of 2000 Kgs is issued to a Cost Center / Work Center, and later charged to production order based on actual Consumption in the said Cost Center / Work Center.
    Regards, Replies and Sugestions shall be appreciated
    Madhu

    Thank you for the reply,
    However, the scenario that i had in mind was a bit different from what you had conceptualized.
    Scenario - These transformers are basically for loading on to Inverters & UPS, The max weight of the transformer range from 15-30 Kgs. and they dont have an external casing of steel as seen on Indian Electricity Board transformers. Multiple production orders are processed at a single time in the Plant as per Customer specifications.
    The general process followed for manufacture is as follows:
    1. Core Winding u2013 This process takes place in the core winding department. Steel reels are loaded on to Winders and individual cores of approx 5 u2013 30 Cm Diameter are produced. (Multiple reels of Steel are stacked one on top of the other onto a pallet.) Usually issue of steel from stores happens pallet wise. The pallets of steel generally weigh in excess of 2 tons.
    In the present situation (Non SAP Environment) the entire pallet of Steel is issued to the Core winding department and later the Output is charged to multiple Production Orders, based on the records of the Core winding dept. Since in general the steel content in the FG ranges from 3- 25 Kgs multiple Production Orders can be catered to from one Pallet of Steel.
    2. Core Laithing. The wound cores are laithed so as to make the sides smooth.
    3. Core Annealing u2013 Heat treatment process.
    4. Core Insulation. u2013 Insulation of the annealed cores with insulating material.
    5. Primary Winding. u2013 Copper is wound as per the BOM Specification. The issue like that of Steel also arises in the Copper winding process. Here also the Cooper comes in Spools which far exceed the requirement for any Production Order. The minimum issueable lot for Copper from Stores is one Spool. The current practice followed is that the Cooper is taken in the name of the Copper winding department and later charged to individual Production Orders.
    6. Primary Soldering.
    7. Mid Insulation.
    8. Secondary Winding
    9. Secondary Soldering
    10. Shielding
    11. Final Insulation u2013 Same issue with insulation too, since the insulating material comes in rolls.
    12. Testing.
    13. Potting & Drilling - Process of pouring a chemical compound in the center of the transformer, which helps the transformer to later be loaded on an Inverter. The same issue with like of Steel, Copper & Insulation arises here too, since the chemical compound comes in big containers capable of meeting production requirement for a week.
    14. Packing
    15. Transfer to FG Inventory.
    One of the suggestions was to issue the entire 2000 Kgs to the Production Order and then return 1700 kgs after completion of the Production Order based on actual usage. However, in my opinion this option might not be practicable because, assuming that I get another / multiple Production orders in between the issue of 2000 Kgs and return of 1700 Kgs, issue to the new Production order will not be possible if the stock in stores was only 2000 Kgs initially. In case assuming that the material is available in stores for the next production order, the situation could worsen in case of receipt of multiple production orders.
    Hope, I have explained the scenario & issue being faced.
    Regards
    Madhu

  • Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)

    Dear Expert,
    I find the Maintenance Work order to cost center settlement does not post to GL module (FI)?Also, the settlement cost element is primary element define in GL chart of account.
    When an maintenance order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the work order value posted cost center and  the value is display in cost center report but not post to GL module in FI.As I notice only good issue or receive to/from work order is posted in GL but not the settlement of work order.Why?
    Between, Kindly advise what are the report or T-code to view the maintenance order is done the settlement and what are the value is settle for maintenance work order?
    Kindly advice under what circumstance when maintenance work order to cost center settlement is posted to GL(FI module)?
    Please advice.
    Thank you.
    KH

    Hi Kiran,
    The error message clearly says that "Cost Center validity starts from 01.10.2014" i.e. in the future period.
    Change the cost center from period in the past date and try.
    BR, Srinivas Salpala

  • Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

    Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail.  When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######.  Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as  KSB1.
    I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center.     Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center?   Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
    Thanks,
    Jeff

    Thanks Christian,
    We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element"  checked.  Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
    For example:  
    expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250.  The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000.  When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000.  We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000  and $250, $250 to 600000.
    Thanks,
    Jeff

  • Internal order and Cost center

    hi guys
    can anyone please explain me why do we have cost centers and internal orders?
    If we can track cost to cost center then why do we need internal orders?
    please give some detailed explanation.
    thanks

    when you are posting a document and if the g/l is created as a cost element then
    you have to either assign a cost center, profit center, internal order etc
    so when you are posting an expense and if its for that project you assign the
    internal order and when the project is finished you can settle it to a cost center.
    If we can assign both internal order and cost center i dont think so but not very
    sure. Best way to learn these things i would recommend is try it in test system
    that way you will understand better about the whole flow and it will stick in your
    mind.
    Regards,
    Zaid

  • Production Order - Segregating Costs for different cost elements.

    Hi Experts,
    I am a QM Key User and have been asked to look into improving our current Non-conformance / re-work process.
    My plan is to include the rework operations within the original PP01 Production Order.
    So far:
    Three Work Centres have been created:
    1. NCRTEST u2013 1st WC to collect hours
    2. NCRTEST2 u2013 2nd WC to collect hours
    3. NCROUTSO u2013 To collect costs associated with outsource operations i.e. weld repair, shaft straightening.
    NCR-02: Activity Type Created
    Two new control keys created
    1. NC01: Confirmation of hours
    2. NC02: Outsource operations (requisition generated)
    NCRTEST-CC: Cost Centre Created
    The Price Planning for Cost Centre/Activity has been specified (KP26 and KPB6)
    Two new Cost Elements have been created:
    1. 43001201 u2013 Costs associated with the outsource operation
    2. 94301021 u2013 NCR Labour Hour Costs 
    On a test production order we have managed to isolate the NCR hours to cost element 94301021 and the outsource operation costs to 43001201; however these costs are automatically settling to the production order material which then settle to the WBS (that is my understanding).
    Is there any way of stopping the costs associated with the two cost elements from settling to the Production Order material? The costs cannot be settled this way as my intention, is for a new development which allocate the costs to the relevant notification QM Order.
    The QM Order will then be settled in the normal way. Settling the production order and the QM order will result in duplicate costs.
    I am not sure if this is a possible solution but is it possible for a negative cost to automatically post to the production order material for the two cost elements. The production order value would be correct and the QM Order could be posted as normal.
    Thanks in Advance
    Ben

    Hi,
       I would expect that the costs get settled to the material only when you settle the production order to the receiver material. I don't think that happens automatically....it will have to be done explicitely
    regards
    Waman

  • PCC vs Production Order Based Costing

    Hi,
    Please reply back difference between PCC and Production Order Based Costing.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Sameer

    Hi,
    PCC is product cost collector which is  used in mostly REM process.
    1. Here you have to creat the product cost collector mean sthe cost is based on period, when u create PCC you are creating the priliminary cost means the quanity strucure costing considering BOM , activity prize and the cost from costing sheet i.e admin cost, etc .
    2. In product cost collector the the cost of document posted in backflush is posted periodiclly. For that u have to run standard cost run i. CK11N and CK24. monthly.
    3. but in Production oredr or Process order thre is no PCC instaed of PCC the cost is settle with the settlement profile defined in OPL8 i.e order type dependent parameter SPRO.
    4. Each prd ord is REL,CNF and TECO when the status is TECO means the logistic point of view the order is complet now ready to costing .
    5 Then FI consultant settle this order
    6. here order based costing no period based costing
    hope u r prob solve..
    Siddhesh

  • Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.

    Is there is a way to have a link from purchase order to cost center report.
    I am meaning kind of:
    Standard way to customized this link?
    or
    User exit to have this link in place
    or
    Any other solution
    Thanks

    For me it does not make any sense from going from PO to cost center report.
    However, if you want to see the purchase order cost incurred with a cost center, execute KSB1 report. Within the layout, bring "Purchasing Document" field, where you can see the purchase order number in cost center line item report.

  • Standard Report for missing parts at production order operation level?

    Hi PP Gurus,
                We have standard report for missing parts at production orders level.
    For our client, they need a report for missing parts analysis at production order operation level. Do we have any such standard report in the SAP?
    Please help.
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

    Hi Arvind,
          Thanks for for your response.
    1. List: Components,  Layout: Standard layout          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each operation of production order. It is not showing the commit quantity.
    2. List: Components,  Layout: Pick list          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/withdrawn  quantity for each production order.
    3. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Material View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
    4. List: Components,  Layout: Missing Parts List-Order View          set the Missing part
           It shows the component requirement/commit quantity for each production order. It is not showing the commit quantity at opertion level.
          We are unable to get the solution from all these 1 to 4 reports from COOIS.
    Do we have any option to change the existing layout (ex: 3 ) to get the commit quantity for operation with missing parts indicator?
    If avilable, what is the procedure to be followed?
    Thanks,
    Reddy.

  • CN41N and S_ALR_87013533 report not showing Production order planned cost

    Hi Experts,
    I am having issue to get total planned production order values in my CN41N or S_ALR_87013533 cost report. I am facing 2 issues :
    1. CN41N repoet does not show individual material cost planned in BOM.
    2. CN41N report and S_ALR87013533 report does not show total value but only picking fixed value.
    Example :
    1. CN41N report :
    Above screenshot shows no values in Project plan cost & Order cost column but it shows total cost as a lumpsum on top for project. I need to know how can i get material cost populated here for Project Valuated stock material?
    2. S_ALR_87013533
    This report shows Total Cost of BOM as 1 line under Material Procurement activity similar to CN41N report. Also Order value is picking from Fixed cost from planned order and total cost is added on top. How can i get Total cost picked from production order?
    Is there any Setting in PS config which allow me to pick the detail production order plan cost in both report under planned cost.
    Thanks in advance.
    Ashish

    Hi Ashish,
    I doubt whether Item level reporting  in S_ALR... (hierarchy report) is possible or not because I haven't seen item level cost in them only the lump-sum cost because they are summarized at cost object level itself. Navigation path are there which we use to go into details of cost.
    Please check the following links:
    https://scn.sap.com/thread/1743833
    (In the above thread,focus on  Mr. Mohamed Rafi comment.)
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/3530080
    http://scn.sap.com/thread/1311820
    Order cost plan in report CN41N
    Display of plan cost., CN41N | ABAP, SAP, benX AG, benXBrain,&…
    Just an additional pointer ,have a look on your costing variant and variation variant settings for material section.
    Regards
    Saurabh

  • How to change purchase order's cost center in batch

    Dear all :
    how to change purchase order's cost center in batch?

    Dear Manish :
    thanks so much for you reply.
    the filed which i wanted to change it's content is cost center (KOSTL) in table EKKN.
    i couldn't find it in this t-code when i select fields.

  • Create Purchase Order to cost center

    Hi,
    Will it be possible to create a purchase requisition from the MRP run which has account assignment K and default a cost center.
    At the moment I need manually to update the requisition item line with 'k' and costcenter before converting to a purchase order.
    br,
    Anders

    The purpose of MRP run is to make sure that you always have enough stock.
    An order to cost center will not increase stock.
    Means: MRP is not able to create requisitions for cost center consumption. If you change a requisition created by MRP to be ordered to a cost center, then the next MRP run will create a new requisition to stock.

  • *Internal Order* or *Cost Center* on SD Sales Order

    Hi Gurus,
    please can you tell me how we can set automatically Internal Order or Cost Center on SD Sales Order (without putting it manually).
    Thank you very much
    Kind Regards
    Andrea

    Hi Andrea,
    As Ambrusa told, one Z table should be created where you can maintain order reasons, sales org, sales order type and the internal order no. as combination and use the below mentioned user exit.
    When user create sales order, system will default the order reasons maintained in the z table and internal order no. will be picked as user select the order reason.
    Hope this will meet your requirement.
    Regards
    Suresh.

  • Can you require settlement rule in Production order !

    Hello,
    i am FICO. one of our processes is to fabricate complex tools that will be capitalized and depreciated when completed.
    while the tools is being fabricated, we would like to settle regularly the production order to a capital order (AUC) and track the budget for the fabrication.
    in this production process we want to require the user to enter a capital internal order in the settlement rule of the production order master data..  this way when Prod order is settled we dont have issues.  can you make settlement rule entry as required during production order creation?
    any input is appreaciated on the issue. Thanks
    Andy

    Hi Francois,
    I would suggest you to ask the PP user to create production order without Material using transaction CO07.
    Here the user can maintain the settlement parameters in the "maintain settlement rule" screen. The account assignment should be "Order - ORD" and can input the internal order number to Settlement reciever feild.
    If you need the final product to be delivered then in the component overview add the material number and the quantity in negative qty. System assumes this as byproduct.
    Hope this helps.. you. Reward your points if so,
    Regards,
    Prasobh

  • Material cost in production order plan cost

    Dear all,
    -we are in sales order cost object with non-valuated stock...
    -we have created two production orders from MRP run. First one is for semi finished material and second one is for finished material.
    Issue-1
    Both production orders not showing material cost in production order plan cost...
    Issue-2
    When i consumed raw material against semi-finished material production order (261-E), system not gnerated any document and material cost not updated either in production order or sales order...
    where should i do changes in configuration to get updated material cost in the production order...
    Best regards
    Kishore

    Hi
    Issue 1 : Check Whether Standard cost is present for header material of prod order, and under control tab of order costing variant for plan is present.
    Issue 2 : Use 261 instead 261E.
    Rajneesh

Maybe you are looking for

  • Invoice output Condition type not populated for many invoice documents

    Hi Guru's Invoice  Out put Condition  type for printing  not populated in the invoice document. Now We need to insert condition type for many  documents to print at a time. We can manually place condition type  at document header level individually f

  • Transparent signature in Acrobat 9.0

    I have been trying to figure this out for several months now. I sure hope someone can help me out. I need to create a graphic signature with a transparent background for use in a pdf document. I have created a .png file with transparency, and all the

  • How do i get my apps and old info onto new phone

    I recently upgraded my phone, now I cant get my apps or anything off of my account onto the new phone? help please

  • EA6500 gets scathing review on CNET with critical issues

    http://reviews.cnet.com/routers/linksys-ea6500-smart-wi/4505-3319_7-35441764-2.html I'm wondering if anyone at Cisco is going to acknowledge the critical connectivity and signal issues with this model.

  • Cannot connect to the site

    We installed Config manager and only added one admin account. During our install, something happened with Exchange and all of our Domain accounts were deleted during a botched mailbox move. So now, no one is able to access the Config manager sites we