Settle PREL WBS element to AUC

Dear,
In certain cases customer wants to settle partially released WBS elements to fixed assets under construction.
Is this possible?
Cuurently I am having an error when settling ("System status Created is active"). However when I check the business process 'Actual Settlement" for the PREL WBS element it is stated to be active (green alert).
rgds,
bert

This is standard behaviour of system as I understand.  In WBS system status hierarchy is like as below.
CRTD->PREL>REL>TECO-->CLSD.  System set PREL when below level WBS 1.1 is REL, So, indirectly on 1 lEvel WBS will have both status active at same time i.e PREL and CRTD. So, Eventhough actual settlement is green in PREL but it is blocked by CRTD status.
However, for confirmation you can alwalys check in SE38 CNSTATUS Report which disply you inconsistancy in System status.
If someone have other openion / view please share. Interesting question !
With Regards
Nitin P.

Similar Messages

  • Settling the WBS element costs to an AuC

    Please Explain the procedure for settling the WBS element costs to an AuC & then to asset?

    Hi,
    Please follow the below sequence of steps for this:
    1) For WBS element where the asset has to be created, AUC willbe created automatically when the WBS element is in release status to get this investment profile should be assigned to WBS element in Control Tab
    2) You can see in the system status show as AUC to see the AUC number follow the path
        EDIT-> WBS element -> Investment program--> Asset under Construction where you can see the AUC which is created automatically
    3) Once the above two steps are through, for settlement to AuC goto transaction CJ88 give the WBS element number select the processing type as partial captalization and execute all the costs pertaining to that. WBS elements will be automatically settled to the AUC which is created for that WBS element
    Thanks,
    Prithwiraj.

  • Cost Before settlement in WBS element

    Hi Experts ,
    In my scenario following costs are coming to WBS element,
    1. Cost from Network ... i.e. Networks are getting settled to WBS element
    2. Internal Order .....i.e. Internal orders are getting settled to WBS element
    3. Plant Manitance order...i.e. PM orders are getting settled to WBS element
    4. Cost from other WBS element..... i.e. cost from one WBS element get settled to other WBS element
    All the cost from WBS element get settled to AUC then from AUC to final asset.
    Before settlement of WBS element  I can see the cost in WBSE in trasnaction CJI3.
    After settlement if I see the cost of same WBSE in CJI3 , it shows 0 cost ,as all the cost has been settled to Asset.
    I wanted to know what was cost before my settlement in CJI3 transaction.
    Could you please let me know in CJ3 transaction on which fields I need to put the filter in above scenario ??
    Regards,
    Pradip Shelke

    Hi,
    YOu can also filter on the basis of document type.
    Please check the relevant document types like WE ( Goods reciept ) etc. Not only KOAO but other business transactions like KOAE also are settlement docs exclude them.
    BR

  • Settlement of wbs element

    Good morning all ps guies
    I need help from u
    I m doing customer project. My top WBS element is account assignment and billing element.
    This wbs is assigned to scales order .I m getting cost and revenues on this wbs element.
    Now i want to settle this wbs element. One way is to settle to co-pa, as this wbs is carring both cost and revenues.
    But co team decided not to implement co-pa.
    so where can i settle this wbs element? and how?
    can i settle to cost center?   scales order?
    Please give ur suggessions
    regards
    shashankl

    Hi Gurus,
    I am loading the REAl ESTATE data through LSMW-BAPI.
    I need to load the settlement reciever as WBS elements.
    While loading the data i am getting  the error
    WBS element does not exist even though it is existing in the client and master table as well.
    KIndly let me know what can be done regarding this??

  • Error - Settlement for WBS Element

    Dear All
    My query is the prj is EP & WBS El is EP-99, under EP-99 the avialable values are Rs192,523/- as per different cost element wise & the values has been posted/transferred the reposting transaction from another wbs element. Those values have to settled on an one AUC-asset & the value will be settled periodicaly. My posted values are in 10th/2008 & I want to settled the said values in 10th prd. But after processing of CJ88 the error has been raised "There no accured amounts settlement is not possible" Also note that Other WBSE has been settled under said prj.
    Please help me.
    Regards
    Avijit Barman
    Edited by: Avijit  Barman on Feb 25, 2008 12:06 PM

    Dear Sreenivas
    My issue is solve but not from note. I convert status from REL to TECO of  WBS element & set the full settlement & prd 11 instead of 10th. Then run & its ok.
    Regards
    Avijit

  • Error when I execute CJ88 form WBS element to AUC asset.

    Hi,
    We have one WBS element which was created to settle the values to AUC asset at the period end. Now we are in 2012 fiscal year 8th period. Asset accounting books were closed for company code of the 2011 fiscal year. This company code currency AUD and Controlling area currency is EUR.
    User has booked some expenses to this WBS element in company code currency in 2012 fiscal year 1st period. When he tried to settle in 2012 fiscal year 1st period, he is getting error like "First clear the values in previous year". when we go and see the WBS element for the 12th period of 2011 fiscal year, still there is a difference "0.01".
    When we go and see the CJI3 for this WBS element, fiscal year 2011 and period 12 still there is some 0.01 value. My doubt is why system is showing this difference in CJI3, even I have posted transactions in company code current. Client was able to close the Asset accounting books without any errors. 
    User has posted expenses debit and credit amount to this WBS element during the period in 2012 fiscal year, still system is showing 5.25 difference  for the same WBS element in CJI3 transaction code.
    Could any body help me to know why this difference is showing even we post the amounts in company code currency. Why system has not given any error in 2011 fiscal year when user was closing books for asset accounting?
    Thanks and regards,
    Yelamanda Rao.

    When closing the year, the system checks to see if Periodic Posting has been recently run, and throws error if it still needs running.  System performs other checks too, such as checks for incomplete asset records.
    However, the system doesn't check for missed settlements.  We have to manually check for settlement errors, and for pending settlements, before closing out the AA year.
    There could be an OSS Note on this topic, do not know.  You may need to reopen the fiscal year and AA year and complete your asset support transactions, settlement, periodic posting, AFAR, AFAB.
    Since the year is already audited, stay in touch with accounting and your auditor before taking these steps.
    It is possible to enter offsetting g/l entries to nullify and defer the impact of your settlement, etc., to FY12 if your requirement is to not alter the FY11 g/l balances audited.  But the AA sub-ledger will be slightly changed.
    Regards,
    Greg

  • Settlement of WBS element down payments to an asset under constructions

    The down payment (of the transactions tcode F-47 and tcode F-110), are
    always settlement wbs element (tcode CJ88), we do not want to post down
    payments to the receiving asset under construction (transaction type
    180 or 181).
    In the down payments are always taken into account in the settlement to
    an asset. The settlement of the down payment is the actual reason for
    the previous update of down payments in FI (Transaction type group
    15). Furthermore, the settlement of down payments to assets should
    not be capitalize.

    When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
    MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
    Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
    Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA.

  • How to identify WBS elements with AuC status

    Hello Experts,
    We had earlier developed a report which determines whether the entered project id can be set to CLSD status or not. The problem arises with few WBS elements which have AuC statuses. The report is displaying them as closeable but we fail to close them through CJ20N. The problem is that the program captures the status of some projects as TECO but these projects have WBS elements which have statuses like "TECO BUDG AUC  SETCu201D because of which the system doesnu2019t allow CJ20N to close it. So can any one help me suggest any means by which we can detect whether any of a projects WBS elements are in the AUC status?
    Regards,
    Uday

    Hi Virendra,
    Thanks a lot for your inputs. I was trying to go through the tables in detail before I again get back to you about anything. From TJ02 I got to know that I0163 is the status code for Asset in construction costs. So I obtained the OBJNR values of all my WBS elements and I went through all the 3 tables TJ02, JCDS & JSTO that you had suggested. The data in JEST for 1 of the OBJNR values contained this I0163 value in 1 row. I wasn't however sure as to which particular status we could consider for the WBS from among the list. Is it something like the last row of the table would be the current status of the element & that all the other statuses just point to the various history of changes that it went through? (Am mailing you a copy of the same thread so that you would get the data displayed in a proper tabular format.)
    Regards,
    Uday
    MANDT   OBJNR              STAT    INACT    CHGNR
      400         PR00304257       I0001      X           002  
      400         PR00304257       I0002      X           004  
      400         PR00304257       I0005      X           001  
      400         PR00304257       I0028                   001  
      400         PR00304257       I0045                   003  
      400         PR00304257       I0064      X           002  
      400         PR00304257       I0067                   001  
      400         PR00304257       I0163                   001

  • Settlement Through WBS element in CJ88

    Dear Expert,
    When I going settle one asse through WBS element P05/00204/CB, I got the follwing problem in SAP
    Down payment to recipient 802000000006 0 area 01 amount 5,142.74 not cleared
    Message no. AW605
    Diagnosis
    All downpayments were not cleared for the asset under construction for the receiver 802000000006 0 in area 01. An amount of 5,142.74 was not cleared, or too much was cleared.
    You can only completely transfer an asset under construction if you reverse the down payments in the current fiscal year beforehand.
    Procedure
    Clear the downpayments that you want to settle to receiver 802000000006 0.
    Should I find the vendor? If yes, how can I find exact vedor.
    Regards
    David

    got it from PS forum

  • Mutually cancelling entry in CJI3 after order settlement to WBS element

    Hi,
    In our scenario we create Service Orders for work execution & assign WBS element to the service order (to control the spends). When actual costs get booked in the service order, I can see these costs in the Project Actual Cost Line items report (CJI3). When I settle the order costs to the WBS element, there is a mutually cancelling entry in the CJI3 report for that WBS element for the settled amount. Is this the right behaviour?
    Can someone pl enlighten how the cost flows from order to WBS element before settlement & after settlement?
    Thanking you in advance
    Rgds
    Deepak

    That's normal with line item report incase you use settlement 'By cost element' (Allocation structure)
    If you use by settlement 'Settlement cost element' you see another line item but again the net balance would be zero.
    But in case of hierarchy reports in PS settlement transactions are ignored.
    To see actual costs on WBS in the line item report, try to use filters and filter out settlement transaction (field offset type, or settlement cost element)
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Settlement fo Wbs element to Copa

    Hi All,
    Iam new to project systems concept. In month end when we settle wbs element to copa.data will flow into F!, profit center and copa, during the settlement to copa
    I want to know what journal entries it will reflect in FI,Profit center and Copa.
    Regards,
    Chandu

    Dear,
             For customer project you should run the result anlaysis and this result anlaysis data you can settle to the COPA.
                                 Then the settled data send to the value field which is given to the PA transfer strature in Settlement profile.
                                              The profit center is debited and credited .
                                               One controlling document is also generated which have cost reduced from WBS element to profibility segement.
    Regards.

  • Collective settlement with WBS element

    hi all,
    is it possible to do settlement collectively as in CO88 but w r t WBS element ?
    Edited by: SIng on May 17, 2010 12:40 PM

    thanks 2 all

  • Product order settlement to WBS element

    Hi experts,
    i have a quastion, how can i settlement product order to WBS element?It exist some customizing for the automatic generation of settlement rules for this?
    Thanks a lot
    Gustavo

    Look in SPRO:
    Project System>Costs>Automatic and Periodic Allocations>Settlement
    Check the:
    Settlement Profiles
    Settlement Rules
    etc
    Above all check the Help documentation from SAP before configuring.

  • Cj8g actual settlement ; projects/wbs elements/networks

    We are every month running cj8g with variant and it is useful for settlements of costs from network>wbs>auc. We are running the variant with Project field with * option.
    We are facing one issue, how can we eliminate /avoid  the projects which are in having  System Status with  CLSD, if we dont put restriction the actual settlements are done for all the projects.
    Experts please help
    Thanks
    srihari

    Hi,
    Search the forum for "Status selection profile" and you will find howit can help you in achieving this. Meanwhile, jsut to give you a start, refer transaction BS42. You can define the desired status selection profile here and use it as required..
    Revert with any specific queries.
    Regards,
    Gokul

  • Assiging wbs element as settlment receiver in service order settlement

    Hi PM CS Experts.
    We are using scenarios of creation of service order from sales order. So whatever cost we incurred for service order settling to sales order via settlement rule - settlment receiver is Sales order i.e. SDI. We are using settlement profie XX which have default object type for settling SDI.   While releasing the service order the settlement rule created with settlement receiver is SDI.
    Now for different business scenarios, we are settling service order cost to WBS. Now we want to create a settlemetn rule for WBS, settlement receiver will be WBS element,  while saving the service order.  What configuration, master data or processes we have to follow for this.
    please reply on this.
    regards
    abhay

    Sales Order line item have account assignment WBS element. From this sales order line, a service order will be created.   So our idea is whatever cost booked to service order should be settled to wbs element instead of sales order.  
    also in location tab of service order, the wbs element from sales order is not inherrited in account assignment section.  Why this we are not knowing. Have you have any idea for this.
    regards
    abhay

Maybe you are looking for