Settled Securities Transaction not appearance in TBB1

Hi expert,
I have a Securities transaction to sale stocks. I created Transaction in TS01. And I already settled in T-code TS04, but it's not appearance in T-code TBB1.
anyone can help for this situation please?
Already settled
but it's not appearance in TBB1

Hi Jyothi
Possible reason is that in your AUC asset, you just have Areas 01 and 20.. You dont have other dep areas
If yes, then solution approach would be
a. For Future cases - Ensure that AUC Asset class has all these dep areas allowed
b. For the present case, either you reverse all postings, create a fresh AUC asset after allowing
dep areas OR
Create a new Trans type (Copy of 100) and restrict it to Dep Areas 25, 35 and 75.. Post the values in tehse dep areas from ABSO
Br, Ajay M

Similar Messages

Down Payment settlement Line is not appearing in the final Billing

Hello All,
Activated the Milestone billing plan. Created a Sales order > Down payment Billing document > and cleared the Down payment billing document.
While trying to bill the final invoice the down payment settlement line is not appearing.
Please suggest us what would be the probable reason for this to resolve the issue.
Checked in detail and found in the table BSID the field sales document ( VBEL2) is populated with blank and not with the sales order number.
Thanks & Regards,
Madhan.

Hi
When you create a final invoice the downpayment clearing line is retrieved using function
module SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ. The function module will not be able to find the
downpayment if the VBEL2 and POSN2 fields are not filled.
If the downpayment is posted and cleared correctly in F-29 (this is the only way) these
fields will be filled and the document should be retrieved and the value transferred to the
AZWR condition.
Run VF01 with a breakpoint in SD_DOWNPAYMENT_READ
go to the end of the function module you will see the structure t_sdaccdpc
This is filled with all valid entries for clearing. I suspect in your case it is missing.
Try posting a new example in using F-29 make sure it shows cleared in the
document flow then check at this point above in the final invoice
Hope this helps you further
Kind regards
Brian

CJ88 - Settlement values are not appearing in CJ88

Hi,
I am not able to see any settlement values when i run CJ88. I have followed below steps.
1.     Create Sales Order (TC: VA01)
2.     Post Outbound delivery and PGI for the sales order (TC: VL01N)
3.     Set the Order (Project) status to REL (TC: CJ20N)
4.     Create Rework WBS/Network and Activity element at the project (TC: CJ20N)
5.     Post one direct labor cost and rework entry to the order (CN25) (Use Activity type TECHXX for direct labor cost and RWRKXX for rework labor cost)
6.     Post overhead (CJ44)
7.     Post RA (KKA2)
8.     Post Settlement (CJ88)
9.     Change the order status from REL to TECO
10.     Post RA (KKA2)
11.     Post Settlement (CJ88) (Here you should see the costs posted to rework order should get settled to GL account 600724000)
I am stucked at step 8, when i ran CJ88, i am not able to see any values. I have checked allocation structure and it is correct. Please help to resolve issue a.s.a.p.

Hi,
After step 5 verify CJI3 report. This is to show actuals against a project. Ensure the costs are posted correctly to the project. Next before OH calculation, do CJ88 for netowork so that it settles the cost to WBS Element. Then run the CJ44. During KKA2 verify the values make sure system calculated the PoC correctly. If everything till here is fine then run CJ88 for the WBS. System should picke up the RA values and post the settlement entries.
PS: all the above assuming RA / Settlement configs are in place.
Regards
Sreekanth

Transaction not appears

Hi all,
In Receivables > Transaction > Transaction i have a transaction with type Invoice which i tried to update via background(it was completed and posted to GL) the BILL_TO_CUSTOMER_ID and BILL_TO_SITE_USE_ID in table RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL. But after that this transaction is not showing anymore... I returned the changes back, but no effect. I checked the table and there exists a record for that Invoice but cannot understand why when i try to find it i receive : FRM-40301: Query caused no records to be retrieved. Re-enter.Version: Oracle Applications : 12.1.3
Thanks in advance,
Bahchevanov.

Hi,
No it's not deleted. I checked it - it has records in RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_ALL and respectively in RA_CUSTOMER_TRX_LINES_ALL.
BR,
Bahchevanov.

Error in transaction COGI does not appear when using FM BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CR

Hi,
I use FM BAPI_PROCORDCONF_CREATE_HDR to confirm the order but the error for goods movement does not appear in COGI but it does appear during manual confirmation in transaction COR6... can anyone help me with this? Thanks a lot!
Rgds,
Mark

Hi,
maybe QE11 is an option for recording results vai BIM.
Cheers,
S>

Service Request - Transaction type not appearing in IC Webclient Pop-Up

Hi,
The service request transaction types SMRQ and YMRQ do not appear in the webclient pop up when i click on Create Service Request.
All the other transaction types are working fine.
I have checked the entries in --> SPRO--> Solution Manager --> Capabilities --> IT Service Management --> Transactions --> Specify several transaction Types.
The entries are SERVICE_REQUEST_TYPE / Seq No 1 / Field Value YMRQ
Please find attached the 2 snips of error message.
Thanks,
Ritesh

Hi Ritesh,
Can you check,
First with SAP all access so that we can rule out this
second check if you have below setting in wizard or confirm in transaction type in SPRO i.e. channel CRM UI
also these are active
Thanks
Prakhar

Notification Tasks not appearing in IW22 but appears in IQS12 transaction

Hi All,
When I try to close the Notification then I am getting the error message u201CTasks are not completedu201D. Even in system status, I got the status there is u201COutstanding tasksu201D. But when I looked for Tasks in Notification, I can not find any tasks in Header or Item Level. In fact there is no TASK Tab at Header or Item Level.
When I checked in QMSM Table, I found entries for that Notification. I came to know about one standard SAP transaction IQS12, where we can process (i.e. Release and / or Complete) the task of Notification. In IQS12 transaction, I found outstanding tasks for that Notification.
I need following clarification, kindly let me know:
- Why the Tasks are not appearing in IW22 transaction but appearing in IQS12 transaction?
- When we can use the IQS12 transaction / purpose of IQS12 transaction?
Regards
Ramu

Hi Pete,
Thanks for the reply!!
For our business requirement, we don't want the task tab for Notification type. Hence we have not configured the task tab.
I found the reason, even we don't have the task tab also we can assign the tasks to Notification by following menu path in IW22 TC: Edit > Tasks > Determine.
This path is only activated, when we made the configuration in Define Response Monitoring > Response Time Monitoring for Notification Type. Here we are assigning the Response Profile to Notification type. In Response Profile, we define the Task Code based Priority.
I hope in this case (i.e. where task tab not defined for Notification), we can use the IQS12 transaction to release and close task. Please let me know, if my understanding is wrong....
Regards
Ramu

SECESS gl not appearing in J1IH OTHR transaction

Hi Friends
I am trying to post the exicse invoice thru J1IH using "Other Adj." Transaction. In that after giving the values for Excise duties , when I click the tab "Determin Gl Accounts" I get the simulated accounting entry in which I dont get the gl account of "Secondary education cess". However the Total of BEDCESSSECC is correctly getting credited to "Excise Duty paid" But since SEcess gl is not there , the entry is unbalanced and system does not allow to post the trnsaction.
. I checked the Account determination for Excis. In "Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction" i have the entry
OTHR Credit RG 23 AT1 Account
Also in "Specify G/L Accounts per Excise Transaction" I have the gl account assigned to relevant excise group for ETT "OTHER" for Rg23A- AT1
Can anybody please tell me why the Secess GL is not appearing in J1IH (OTHR) transaction ???
Thanks and best regards
Vijay

Hi Vikas
Thanks a lot ! Problem resolved !!
Although GL was assined ,The entry for MRDY RG23A CREDIT was missing in "Specify Excise Accounts per Excise Transaction" . After I added the entry , the SEcess field is comming correctly now
Thanks for your timely help vikas
best regards
Vijay

STO po number not appearing in VL10B transaction

Dear Guru,
I have created STO PO with inter plant transter and shipping tab is also coming as per required in STO
but for further operation in VL10B transaction STO PO number is not appearing
Pl let me know if i have missed anything important.
Regards,
Vimlesh

hi,
Please try this way with check points
1.delivery date in PO and make sure it is in the delivery creation date range of VL10B
2.Stock of material should be available in supplying plant.
3.Enter PO number in Purchase Orders tab (T code VL10B) and execute
4.In next screen,Select line and click on Background button.this will create a delivery.
Hope it would work...
regards,
Vineet

Cost Element column not appearing in IW31/ IW32 transaction

Hi,
In transaction IW32, in Operations Tab --> click on External Button (below shown on IW32 screen).
Now under External, click on Services tab (1st option), here Cost Estimate column not appearing.
We tried to add through configuration option on this window. (there shows table setting --> click on administrator, now you can see Edit system settings, here Cost Element - ESLL-KSTAR shown with TICK on Invisible checkbox).
How can i Untick that. I tried but after activate, it again appears.
Plz guide..

Hi,
Where a cost element exists on the operation External TAB, input of the same data on the service line is not allowed. In that case the system decides that this data field should not be available on the service lines. Where the is no cost element on operation then entry is allowed on service line.
This program logic is overwriting the field configuration on the table setting for service entry grid. This is why the invisable flag cannot be changed.
-Paul

Transaction key NVV not appearing in OB40 transaction

Hi,
I have assigned account Key NVV to the condition type JVRN - VAT/LST Raw Mat Inv in the Tax procedure (Tcode OBYZ). Now I want to assign G/L account for the Account Key NVV in the transaction OB40, NVV is not appearing in OB40.
What could be the issue & Solution.
Kind regards,
Kishore

Hi,
Now I want to assign G/L account for the Account Key NVV in the transaction OB40, NVV is not appearing in OB40.
Its sap standard non-deductible account key which we have to use .
why you not create new one and assign there in place of NVV ?
if you change NVV your change applicable for not only CST but for all where you used it
so create new and assign there
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Amount Rule Type field not appearing in settlement rule screen.

Hi Experts,
We developed a program which creates settlement rules automatically on uploading data from excel file.
We encountered the following error.
cursor field COBRB-BRTYP does not exist in the screen
In the Settlement rule screen, under distribution rules, the field amount rule type is not appearing.
We have 3 level WBS structure. For the 1 level WBS this field is not appearing. But this field is visible for below WBS.
Please help me..
Regards,
Praisty

Hi Balachandar,
As i said, we are using an excel sheet upload to create settlement rules for WBS elements.
While uploading we got this error. COBRB-BRTYP does not exist in the screen.
Now we need to check with abaper, why the program is checking that field in particular.
Any way, thanks for your prompt reply.
Regards,
Praisty

Baseline date mesg not appear when call transaction FB60 in custom tcode

Hi Experts,
One of the custom tcode which calls the standard tcode FB60.
If we give the last month date in payment date, it should shows the 'Due date is in the past' message and if we give next year as payment date i.e, more than 365 days, then show 'Baseline date foe pmnt is 700 days after the document date : check'.. These messages are coming when we call the standard tcode FB60 directly.
But if call it in the custom tcode, these messages are not appear.
Thanks,
Mani.

Hi Experts,
One of the custom tcode which calls the standard tcode FB60.
If we give the last month date in payment date, it should shows the 'Due date is in the past' message and if we give next year as payment date i.e, more than 365 days, then show 'Baseline date foe pmnt is 700 days after the document date : check'.. These messages are coming when we call the standard tcode FB60 directly.
But if call it in the custom tcode, these messages are not appear.
Thanks,
Mani.

'Default Risk Limit' tab is not appearing in FTR_CREATE !!!

Hi
I encountered the problem related to Default Risk Limit is not appearing in T.Code: FTR_CREATE while creation of Financial Transaction.
I have done the following activities
1. Activation of Default Risk Limit Check
2. Define Limit Types
3. Activation of Financial Object Integration for Limit Management
4. Define Default Risk Rule
5. Derive Default Risk Control parameters for Money Market Transactions
6. Limit creation in T.Code TBL1) for Business Partner
7. Already created and settled Financial Transaction for the same Business Partner.
8. FTR_EDIT u2013 Edit Financial Transaction
9. FTR_CREATE u2013 Financial Transaction creation
When I try to create (FTR_CREATE) the Financial Transaction I couldnu2019t able to see the Default Risk Limit Tab. Please suggest if I miss any other configuration or else.
Thanks a lot for your valuable advise.

Hi Chandra,
You have also raised this issue to SAP support. I am already working on this issue in that message. I hope you wouldn't require this thread here.
Regards,
Jitesh

Line items are not appearing while processing F-44

With transaction F-44, to clear vendor account, the system displays only one open item, whereas there are 2 open items on the line item report (FBL1N). Further there are two line items in BSIK.
Please help

Hello,
There are two line items in the Vendor account, the details are as follows:
Date             Amount                  PK                 DR/Cr
31.03.2008   12,050.00                38                      Cr
05.06.2008   12,050.00                28                      Dr
of above while processing F-44, we are able to see only debit item dated 05.06.2008.other line item is not appearing. When tried by putting document number, it says "NO OPEN ITEMS FOUND"

Settled Securities Transaction not appearance in TBB1

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for