Settlement amount Available amount error in CJ88

Hi All
We have a WBS element where we have posted expenses over a period of time. Periodically amounts were passed to AUC. Now we are are trying to capitalizae the fixed asset. Settlement amount is the same amount what we see in AUC. But still we are getting error message that Settlement amount > Available amount. Not what what could be the issue.
We noticed that there is last expense posting, if we reduce this amount in settlement rules then system allows to settle. This amount being shown in AUC (Asset values) not being considered in settlement.
Waiting fro replies.
Regards
Neeraj

Hi Raman
Below is the screenshot.
Regards
Neeraj

Similar Messages

  • Settlement G/L account Error in CJ88 Transaction

    Hi
    i am receiving error in CJ88 transaction when I am trying to settle cost. I have created default settlement rule on WBS by enhancement, The G/L Account is also balancesheet account. Error message-- G/L account is not assigned to controlling area.
    Please suggest the soulution. Thanks

    Hi,
    Can you  elaborate the error in detail,
    You want settle the WBS to GL right?
    The GL which you are setting the same GL is getting error.
    You have checked the GL in FS00 or FSP0, If you have not checked in FS00 then check in FSSo whether it is extended to Company code.

  • Wheni am tried to settle order i got error  There are no accrued amounts; s

    Wheni am tried to settle order i got error  There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.

    Hi Guru,
    Details of production order
    Target quantity =1,063,893      Delivered quantity =1,063,893     confirmed quantity = 1,074,945     EA     Basic start =07.04.2009     Basic finish   =01.11.2010     TECO PCNF DLV  PRC  GMPS MANC RESA SETC*
    When i am trying to close order system gives Error messsage
      000 Unprocessed future change recs for order SS50008TT/1A prevent del. fl
      000 Order SS50008TT/1A is partially confirmed
    Unprocessed future change recs for order SS50008TT/1A prevent del.
    flag/completion
         Message no. CO688
    Diagnosis
         There are still future change records or error records to be process
         from the confirmation for the confirmation processes in order
         SS50008TT/1A. Possible confirmation processes are:
         o   Automatic goods receipt
         o   Backflushing
         o   Calculation of actual costs
         o   Data transfer to HR
    System Response
    You are not meant to set the deletion flag/'completed' status
    with future change records that have not been processed.
    edure
    You should process the open future change records using
    o   Predefined confimration process or
    o   The CORUPROC program, by dispatching it in Customizing in
        background job (dispatch background jobs: dispatching proc
    Check if incorrect goods movements or incorrect actual cost ca
    exist for the order, and reprocess these if necessary:
    o   Reprocessing incorrect goods movements
    o   Reprocessing incorrect actual cost calculations

  • PS Budget Report S_ALR_87013558 shows negative available amount

    Hi ,
    We activated Availability control in our Project System. We created a project, WBS elements, network activities. Then setup the budget (WBS level) then release the budget. Purchase requisitions were made to PO items, some were receipted and some are still in Commitment. We also added the cost for Travel and Accomodation but haven't posted any actual cost for these network activities. Then when I generated S_ALR_87013558 the budget available amount shows a negative balance.
    I already run CJEN to reconstruct the table, CJBN to recontruct the availability control balance but it still generating the same negative available balance.
    We setup our tolerance limit to raise an error once the budget reached 100% but in this case it should already been triggered before reaching zero but it didn't happen.
    Any solution for the problem is greatly appreciated.
    From this going forward any cost that need to be added to the project triggers the error message BUDGET EXCEEDED! it supposed to been triggered before the negative available amount on the report was reached.
    The report show that I have an amount presented on the following columns:
    ACTUAL
    COMMITMENT
    REMORDPLAN
    ASSIGNED
    I already checked the individual network activities to checked if the balance showed in the RemOrdPlan is correct using the formula REMORDPLN = MAX(0, PLAN - (Actual+Commitment)) and it is consistent with the amount presented in the report.
    thanks
    sunil

    Hi,
    Some ideas :
    1st. Try to check the history when the AVAC activated. It could be AVAC activated after PR/PO created.
    2nd. Try run cj31. Compare the value there with the report S_alr_**** . If the value is not match , you should apply some notes. It could be your AVAC not working properly.
    3rd. In order to prevent any futher issue for another project. Try to CJBW, CJEN and CJBN, for all projects (one time only). Put some budget on it. Next step do background schedule (CJEN after that CJBN) let say for weekly for all projects.
    Hope can give you some ideas.
    Cheers,
    Nies

  • PS: Settlement of specifiek amounts without real posting on WBS

    I would like to know which settings are to be made to make it possible to settle specific amounts from WBS elements to lets say cost centers without posting on the settling WBS element first. This means that the WBS element that is to be settleted becomes a negative value.

    Hi
    In continuation to my previous answer,
    in fact there are two types of rules for amount settlments.
    Rule 1: Settle specified amount each period
    Rule 2: Settle upper amount.
    In the first case every month a fixed amount is settled from WBS and it can even
    go negative if the debits are less
    In the second case system settles specified or the amount available on WBS which is less in each period. In this way system restricts to a maximum amount available on a WBS and it will not go into negative anytime.
    But in both the case every period there must be postings on WBS to settle
    It is not possible to post 0,01 euro to a WBS element in say january 2007  and settle every month until the end of the year to another CO object.
    Bye
    Ram

  • Prevent negative avail. amounts

    Hi,
    I need to avoid next situation:
    In Funds Center X I have budget 100$, Exp. 80$ and avail. amount 20$.
    I can post, via FMBB, budget document (proc.-ENTER) for minus 50$, for example, although I have only 20$ avail. amount. I want to stop this budget document by error message.
    The same problem, but at actuals side, I solved via tolerance profiles in BCS, but budget side is not supported here.
    I tried to use consistensy libraries but it does not help me.
    Please advise.
    Regards.

    Hi Andryuha!!!
    The AVC control should stop you from reducing the budget below the available amount. Try to reconstruct the AVC ledgers and see if the problem persits.
    Consistency  libraries could be of any use, if you do not have consumption in the budget line in question. Then, you can prevent entering negative budget. But when part of a budget has been consumed, AVC should issue a message.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • I activated an iTunes gift card, my iPod showed the amount available ($15) and after downloading 2 songs all I had left was $.04.  Any ideas on what happened to my funds or how I can find out where the rest of the money went?

    I activated an iTunes gift card, my iPod showed the amount available ($15) then after downloading 2 songs my balance was $.04.  Any ideas on what happened to the rest of my funds or how I can find out where the rest of my money went?

    - Have youwent to yur iTunes account looked at your puchase history for purchases thant y might have forgotton?
    - Maybe you had an unpaid balance before redeeming the card.
    - Contact iTunes
    Apple - Support - iTunes - Contact Us

  • PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount

    Dear all,
    I have an issue in Production while doing J1IEX....
    While capturing of Part 2 value in J1IEX, the system gives the following issue..."PLA-AT2 amount 24.12.2009 is greater than available amount"
    Kindly any one give the solution.....
    thanks and regards,
    Mohan.M

    Closed.
    We should not give greater than date of MIGO. We should give MIGO transaction date.

  • Available amount in Bank Determination - APP

    Hi,
       In Automatic payment program Bank Determination step we are giving the available amount, after running the APP the available amount will not be reduced why? And what basis it will take the priority of the Ranking....
      Thanks in Advance
      Abhi

    In Bank Determination if you click on Available amount, There are the fields as folling
       House BAnk / Account ID / Days / Currency / Available for Outgoing pmt/ SIM
      i am asking this available for outgoing pmt why not reduced after running the APP.
       Plz let me clarify...........

  • Amount updation in 'Available amounts' in Bank Determination of FBZP (FI-BL)

    Hello,
    The available amounts section in the Bank Determination (FBZP) will have Available planned amount for outgoing payments. Here we will make some junk amount (999,999,99). Is there any possible that this field can be updated with the exact amount as per our Bank accounts during incoming file from Bank thro FF.5?
    For eg., if our bank account has 45000 EUR by end of the day, then i want the see the same amount in the FBZP configuration as well. PFA the screen. Thanks to have a reply!
    Regards,
    D'nesh

    Hi Dinesh,
    I forgot to mention that it is applicable for outgoing payments and is updated manually for vendor payments.
    It is not updated automatically on incoming file. The purpose of this report is to maintain the available amounts with different banks and then when you run F110 for payments, system will generate/pick up banks as per the amount available and ranking. Say, if 45000 Euro that you maintained get exhausted, it will pick up the next bank to the extent of amount maintained in that bank.
    Regards,
    Kavita

  • FBZP-Bank determination-Available amount

    Hi All,
    We have available amount in bank determination field in FBZP.  what is the function of this available amount.
    Thanks and regards,
    Ravi.V

    Hi,
    The amount planned here is available for outgoing payments. The amount is only used for payments with which the bank debit entry is expected during the number of days displayed.
    Hope it had clarified you.
    thanks
    GBharathi

  • Available amounts

    hi,
    i got the below from forum:
    "In FBZP we have to maintain compulsorily for the available amount for our house bank. then only u can make the payment to vendor. otherwise it is not possible.
    Once u maintain the available amount limit, then only house bank will provide payment to vendor for the invoice which u have created from them during the payment thrugh F-53 or F-58 or F110. Othewise it will not allow payment to vendor."
    But in my FBZP, I do not maintain the particular house bank available amount yet I still able to make payment. Why?
    thanks

    Hi
    There is every possibility that the Payment Run would have picked up the next bank from the Ranking Order for which , available amounts is mentioned. Please check this. This is a possibility, but unless the payment run log is checked, I cannot tell you the exact cause of this behaviour. If the above is not your case, kindly paste the relevant log details for this run here.
    Thank you.
    Suresh Jayanthi.

  • Re- what is the Importance currency  in the Available amounts of APP

    We are maintained  one House Bank in UAE under that we have maintained 2 sub accounts in which one for USD currency another one is AE currency. We are Maintained Different GL Accounts for the both sub accounts . GL Account currency followed by company code currency.
    at the time of FBZP in Bank determination for Available Amount i could be mentained Subaccount Depedent currency or GL Account Currency.

    Hi,
    In available Amounts (FBZP), currency is for the combination of House Bank and Account ID. A house can make payments in multiple currencies. So currency and available amount of that currency can be maintained in this screen.
    Thanks
    Murali.

  • Required Table for Available Amount Budget

    Hi Experts ,
    Could you please any body help me out for Available Amount Budget  Table (Combination of Fundcenter/Commitment Item/etc)
    Regards
    Srinivas
    9603351848

    Hi, Samar
    for getting TDS the required table is WITH_ITEM where you will find the data related to TDS deduction. On the basis of Customers & Vendors.
    Regards
    Surender Bhomia

  • Error During CJ88 Msg#F5702

    Hi Gurus,
    I encountered error during settlement via CJ88,  am settling amounts from previous year to current year as full settment.
    The error encountered:  Balance in transaction currency
    Msg No. F5702
    Diagnosis:
    A balance has occured in transaction currency SGD with the ff details:
    Exchange Rate "00", amount 284,000-  and currency key SGD
    The data in the transaction currency were transferred from the calling application.
    System Response:
    Your data cannot be processed in FI
    Procedure:
    The error is probably in the calling application
    Thank you very much.
    Evelyn

    Hi Narayan,
    Have checked the currency maintained in Co Area and it is in SGD.
    Please advise how to solve the error in CJ88.
    Thanks!
    Eve

Maybe you are looking for

  • ITunes not opening.  NO ERROR MESSAGE

    I cannot get iTunes to open. When I double click on it, the "hour glass" shows up, and I give it a minute or more, but the program does not open? I have the updated verision, but cannot get it to open. No error message when I try to open it...no prog

  • .pdf files appear as a gray screen

    .pdf files appear as a gray screen when downloading from a website link since upgrading to Snow Leopard. They (pdf files) are fine when received and opened from an email sent to us.  Any ideas on how to fix it? 

  • I can't modify the field MARC-LOSGR using the badi BADI_MATERIAL_REF

    Hello! I have to force a value in the field "lot size" (MARC-LOSGR) when the system extends automatically a material with the transaction CK40N. I tried to use the badi BADI_MATERIAL_REF, wich seems to be perfect for this purpose, but it doesn't work

  • Set as default

    I want to use Firefox as my browser. How do I set it as the default browser instead of Safari?

  • Lower bounds

    Using generics for the first time I stumbled upon this basic situation: ArrayList<Number> arrayList = new ArrayList<Integer>(); //compile error Number number = arrayList.get(0);...then I found the correct syntax to make it work: ArrayList<? extends N