Settlement for real CC with statistical IO for information

Hi experts,
Is there a way to make a settlement with real cost center to cost center but with the statistical internal order linked to the posting.
Ex : FI posting GL: 60XXXX for 100EUR on CC A (real) and IO AA (statistical)
This should be settled on CC B
I would like to have for my settlement : 60XXXX 100EUR origin CC A origin IO AA
destination CC B dest. IO AA
Is there a way or user exit to do so?
Thanks in advance,
Chris

Hi Chris
As Ajay said, you can post to two cost objects. Create an I/O type (Statistical) and create a field status variant with the CC and I/O mandatory if you can do so on one account, or just make them available for posting.
The FI entry will debit the cost centre (real) and also debit the Stat I/O statisticall.
Create a cost centre assessment cycle which can take the costs off the CC without it doing anything on the I/O. Your I/O will still have the data. If you would like the cost centre costs to be 'moved' to another one, create a distribution cycle rather.
Hope this clarifies it a bit.
Kind regards
Dawn

Similar Messages

Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

Hi,
We are testing ETO (engineering-to-order) scenario With valuated
project stock and cost based POC RA method.
Inventory is updated during external procurement and we have used
statistical cost elements (Cost element category - 90) for inventory G/L.We want to use a
Result analysis method which considers this statistical cost elements
for calculating POC.For this purpose we have implemented SAP Notes
616960, 616869 and 78420.
In short, as per SAP note 616869, we created a customer enhancement
project for customer enhancement 5 of the results analysis (see Note
H78420). We copied the source code for customer enhancement 5 of the
correction instructions of note 616869 and then implemented SAP note
616960 to read the statistical actual costs.
Then we included the statistical cost as actual costs - Category K in
OKG4.
The system is doing POC and revenue in excess of billing calculation
correctly after taking into consideration the posted statistical cost.
During settlement of RA (CJ88), system is not giving effect to
inventory value. On settlement of RA, revenue should be recognized but
at the sametime the inventory represented by statistical posting should
be consumed(COS). The system should post a P&L posting which reduces
the inventory (representing statistical cost) and updates the actual
costs on settlement.
In our example, Statistical actual
posting is of USD 57150, planned revenue USD 100000 and POC is 70.27%.
Revenue in excess of billing comes to USD 70265.60. Recognisation of
revenue of USD 70265.60 is not correct as actual consumption is yet to
happen. The correct posting in FI should be revenue of USD 70265.60
along with COS of USD 57150.
Please suggest why on settlement the system is not posting the COS
along with revenue recognised?
Thanks,
BK

Hi Bijay,
We are in a similar situation in one project. Did you get any solution to the problem you posted here? If you can share it, please.
Regards,
Gireesh

EAM ID based or Role based? Why settle for just one?

G'Day All,
I've raised a question in the following blog, however I would like to open it up to other people as well so they might get something out of it and in the process might share their own thoughts on the matter at hand.
ID-Based Firefighting vs. Role-Based Firefighting
So this is where I am at this point:
From what I can gather so far, my understanding of EAM ID/ROLE based is as follows:
- Id Based: Logs in using own U.ID and through GRAC_SPM accesess FFID from the GRC Server and logs into the system assigned to them (ECC, SRM, CRM etc)
Only one user at a time can use a FFID.
Firefighter need not exist in every system assigned to them due to central logon however they need to exist in the GRC system
Knows exactly when FFID is being used as he/she has to login so has a psychological effect (good thing)
Better tracking of FF tasks - Specific log reports with Reason Codes. Bonus point from Auditors!
Two Log ins so potential to commit fraud. (1 action using own UserID and 1 action using FFID)
Could be hard to track and find out when a fraud has been committed so can be a problem with auditors.
      ID Based -> GRAC_SPM : TCode for Centralised FFighting -> You will see FFIDs assigned to you
      ID Based -> /n/GRCPI/GRIA_EAM : TCode for DCentralised FFighting -> You can see the FFIDs assigned to you
- Role Based: Logs into the remote system only using U.ID, so everything gets logged against that one ID.
Multiple users can use the FFROLE at once.
Firefighter has to exist in every system assigned to them - so multiple logons.
Hard to differentiate between FF tasks and normal tasks as no login required So easy to slip up
Time consuming to track FF tasks - No Specific log reports. No Reason Codes
     R.Based -> GRAC_SPM : TCode for Centralised FFighting -> You will see FFROLEs
     R.Based -> /n/GRCPI/GRIA_EAM : TCode for DCentralised FFighting -> Not applicable so wont work
So based on this there are pros and cons in both however according to SAP only one can be used. To me personally, it makes more sense to get the best of both the worlds right? So here is my question why can’t we just use both?
    . Really critical tasks -> FFID
    . Normal EAM tasks -> FFRole
Alessandaro from the original post pointed this out:
"Per design it isn't possible to achieve both types of firefighting at the same time. It's a system limitation and hence to configurable."
Well this is what I can't seem to get my head around. For a FFID, there is a logon session so it has to be enabled and as far as I can tell there is no way around it.
However for FFRole, there isn't such limitations/restrictions like starting a separate session. FFRole is just assigned to an end user for him/her to perform those tasks using their own user ID.
So in what way is it different from any of their other tasks/roles, other than the fact that they've got an Owner/Controller assigned to the FFRole? and
What is stopping us from using it when ID based is the default?
If I were to do the following does it mean I can use both ?
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 1 (GRC System) -> ID Based
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 2 (Plug-In) - > Role Based
Please excuse me if my logic is a bit silly, Role Based firefighting is only done on Plug-in systems so the following should work just fine:
   . Config Parameter: 4000 = 2 (Plug-In) - > Role Based
However for ID based, it is a Central Logon, so the following is a must:
    . Config Parameter: 4000 = 1 (GRC System) -> ID Based
Which means both ID/Role based can be used at the same time, which seems to be working just fine on my system. Either way I leave it you experts and I hope you will shed some light on it.
Cheers
Leo..

Gretchen,
Thank you for thoughts on this.
Looks like I'm failing to articulate my thoughts properly as the conversation seems to be going in a different direction from what I am after. I'll try once more!
My query/issue is not in regards to if/what SAP needs to do about this or why there isn't more support from Companies/Organizations and not even, which one is a better option.
My query is what is stopping us(as in the end users ) from using both ID/Role based at the same time?
Now before people start referencing SAP documentation and about parameter 4000, humour me with the following scenario please. Again I would like to reiterate that I am still in the learning phase so my logic might be all wrong/misguided, so please do point out to me where I am going wrong in my thought process as I sincerely would like to know why I am the odd one out in regards to this.
Scenario
I've created the following:
FFID
FFROLE
Assigned them to, two end users
John Doe
Jane Doe
I set the Configuration Parameters as follows:
IMG-> GRC-> AC-> Maintain Configuration Settings -> 4000:1 - ID Based
IMG-> GRC (Plug-in)-> AC-> Maintain Plug-In Configuration Settings-> 4000:2 - Role Based
User1
John Doe logs into his regular backend system (ECCPROD001)-> executes GRAC_SPM-> Enters the GRC system (GRCPROD001)-> Because the parameter is set to ID based in the GRC Box, so he will be able to see the FFID assigned to him-> and will be presented with the logon screen-> Logs in -> Enters the assigned system (lets say CRMPROD001) At this point the firefighting session is under progress
User2
Jane Doe logs into her regular backend system (ECCPROD001) -> (can execute GRAC_SPM to check which FF Role has been assigned to her but she can see that in her regular menu, so there is no point) -> Executes the transactions assigned in FFROLEThis is done at the same time while FFID session is in progress
So all I want to know is if this scenario is possible? if the answer is No, then why not?
I physically carried out this scenario in my system and I had no problems(unless I am really missing the plot here), which brings me back to my original question: Why settle for just one?
Again to reiterate I am not getting into the efficacy or merits of this or even if one should use this. Just want to know if it is possible/feasible or not.
So there you have it. That's the whole enchilada(as they say there in Texas). I tried to word my thoughts as concisely as I can, if there are still any clarifications, more information you or anyone else reading this would like, please do let me know.
Regards,
Leo..

ORD to AUC settlement for previous year

Hi All,
We have a scenario wherein some expense exists on the Internal order for 2014. The Asset fiscal year has been changed to 2015.
While trying to settle the ORD to AUC for current year, we get a message to do the settlement for previous year.
I checked the SAP notes, it recommended:
1. To do a PRE settlment to Cost Center/receiver in 2014,
2. Manual reposting of cost from the receiver to ORD in 2015, and
3. AUC settlement in 2015.
Please suggest if there is any other way to do it with/without opening the previous fiscal year.

Hi Pankaj,
Check the settle parameters of the order, have you defined settlement type as "periodic settlement" for the asset. If yes, add another line for full settlement for it. Then do settlement for 2015 with processing type as "Automatic", then system will post to 2015 for the asset.
Regards,
Mukthar

After seeing the production in London I purchased the whole sound track and it did not completely load. I've never had this problem Today I am downloading an album only to find out it's missing the voacals. Do I have to start just settling for this kinds

After seeing the production of Matilda in London I purchased the whole sound track and it did not completely load. I've never had this problem before so I just forgot about it. Today I am downloading an album only to find out it's missing the voacals. Do I have to start just settling for these kinds things. I'm feeling taken.

Hello MarkFKenny,
If you feel that there is an issue with a purchase made, you can report an issue with said purchase to the folks in our iTunes Store.
How to report an issue with your iTunes Store, App Store, Mac App Store, or iBooks Store purchase
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1933
Cheers,
Allen

Is it possible to run MRKO settlement for previous month date.

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement from client, where they need to do the MRKO settlement in previous month period.
I know the posting date and document date by default taken as current date.
For Example : I have done the GI on 25/05/2010 and forgot to do the settlement on the same month
now suppose on 02/06/2010 i want to do the settlement for 25/05/2010.
In this case system will take the current date as posting date, is it possible here to change the posting date to
pervious month period 25/05/2010????
what is the standar rule according to SAP and if it is possible to post in the back date will it impact anything further.
Please help me in solvning this issue.
Rabindra S

Use Exit "EXIT_RMVKON00_001".
It read the date from posting date and settle on given posting date
And follow the follwing code....
DATA: wa_rkwa TYPE rkwa,
      wa_bseg TYPE bseg,
      wa_bkpf TYPE bkpf,
      fieldname(80),
      myidx TYPE i,
      ex_poper LIKE t009b-poper,
      ex_gjahr LIKE t009b-bdatj.
FIELD-SYMBOLS: <fs_date> TYPE rkwa-bldat.
MOVE '(RMVKON00)SO_BUDAT-HIGH' TO fieldname. "<fs_bkpf>-budat.
ASSIGN (fieldname) TO <fs_date>.
LOOP AT t_rkwa INTO wa_rkwa.
CALL FUNCTION 'DATE_TO_PERIOD_CONVERT'
    EXPORTING
      i_date               = <fs_date>
      i_periv              = 'V3'
   IMPORTING
     e_buper              = ex_poper
     e_gjahr              = ex_gjahr
   EXCEPTIONS
     input_false          = 1
     t009_notfound        = 2
     t009b_notfound       = 3
     OTHERS               = 4
IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID sy-msgid TYPE sy-msgty NUMBER sy-msgno
            WITH sy-msgv1 sy-msgv2 sy-msgv3 sy-msgv4.
ENDIF.
READ TABLE t_bkpf INTO wa_bkpf
                WITH KEY bukrs = '1000'
                         belnr = wa_rkwa-belnr
                         gjahr = wa_rkwa-mjahr.
IF sy-subrc EQ 0.
    myidx = sy-tabix.
    wa_bkpf-monat = ex_poper.
    wa_bkpf-gjahr = ex_gjahr.
    wa_bkpf-budat = <fs_date>.
    wa_bkpf-bldat = <fs_date>.
    MODIFY t_bkpf FROM wa_bkpf INDEX myidx. " TRANSPORTING bldat budat.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Regards
Rasmi Ranjan Mishra

Settlement for month-end closing, individual production or sales order

Dear SAP Experts,
Our style is MTO.
In month-end closing, we follow to make a settlement for production orders:
1. CO43   -- Actual overhead calculation (collective processing)
2. KSU5   -- Actual allocations Assessment
3. KSII     -- Actual Price Calculation
4. CON2 -- Revaluation at actual prices (collective processing)
5. KKAO -- WIP calculation (collective processing)
6. CO88 -- Production order settlement (collective processing)
Question:
1. What kind accounts will be effected after above each step?
2. does individual production settlement need step 1-4 in above?
    1. KKAX (Work in Process)
    2. KO88 (Settlement)
    Is those enough?
3. What kind account will be effected after va44 processing?
Any tips will be welcome.
Zhou Zhen

Hi,
The value flow completely different for each of the MTO Scenario.
I need to know what kind of MTO scenario you have.
is it MTO - Valuated Sale Order without Sale Order Controlling
Is it MTO - Valuated Sale Order with Sale Order Controling
is it MTO- Non-valuated Sale Order (Sale Order controlling is mandatory)
based on this the value flows and the transaction that need to be executed will differ.
The way you explained i presume that it could be any of the first two scenarios.
in such case, the value flows are as good as make to stock scenario. Only in the third scenario, the value flow completely changes
For 1. What kind accounts will be effected after above each step?
all the accounts relevant for Make to Stock will get affected. But the the scenario is MTO - Valuated Sale Order with Sale Order Controling, the the variances from production order is settled to Sale order instead of settling to COPA.
For 2. does individual production settlement need step 1-4 in above?
All the steps from 1 to 6 are necessary for any of the above 3 scenarios
For 3. What kind account will be effected after va44 processing?
This is for calculating the overheads on the sale order. in this case, the sale order is a controlling object. once this t.code is executed, you can see the oh being calculated on the sale order
Hope this will give some good isight in to various MTO scenarios
Best Regards
Surya

Should I settle for less than what I am paying for...

A couple of months ago I upgraded to BT Infinity 1 Unlimited. The package was for speed of between 25 mb to 35mb.
As I was only getting on average 15 to 16 mb on one occasion 12.8mb. I rang and BT who sent an engineer out. On checking the HD box the engineer made improvements at the box. and now sometimes I get between19mb to 21mb. The engineer said that as the box is 436 metres away from my house I would never be able to get even the lowest speed of 25 mbps.
I have just run the BTW TEST which reads as follows
Download speed 20.90
MAX 22.9
For your connection the acceptable range of speeds is 16.3mhps--22.9mhps.
Upload speed during test 3.75mbps
Upstream rate IP profile for your line is 10mbps.
Do you think I should settle for less than what I am paying for.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Thanks for your reply,
I have been with bt for over 40 years and have great service from them. I know a lot of other users have bigger problems.
It was just that the advert on line said 25 to 35 mhps and I was hopeing that I would not have to keep watching the little circle going round and round before opening a page.
I buy and sell racecards on ebay and most times bid on things in the last few seconds and slow turning of the pages does not help. ,

HT1918 I can't seem to update my apps or make any purchases on from my account. Nothing has changed with my credit card information and for some reason the iTunes Store tells me my information is incorrect. What do I do?

I can't seem to update my apps or make any purchases on from my account. Nothing has changed with my credit card information and for some reason the iTunes Store tells me my information is incorrect. What do I do?

Yes, it's frustrating.
I don't have my iPod with me but, as I recall, the change is done in Settings/Store. That change will apply to NEW purchases. However, be aware that all purchases are permanently associated with the Apple ID that was originally used. Generally, it's only a problem when you need to update an app. IF you do your updating from iTunes and your logged in to the "wrong" ID, you'll need to log out and back in again. It's easier from the iPod as you do not need to log out/in but you do need to know the password.
Unfortunately, you can not merge IDs nor can you transfer purchases from one ID to another. Go here to find out exactly what you have. I have the same problem so I deliberately made both passwords identical to make things slightly easier for me.

No AUC shown on settlement for WBS

The WBS shows status of AUC but when you go to the the WBS and check the settlement rule, there is none shown. If you go from the project WBS to the AUC (Extras>Asset under construction)the AUC was created.
The account assignment indicator is set and the investment profile is assigned to the WBS and provides for an asset under construction.
I am using t-code CJ20N. Why isn't the AUC shown on the settlement for the WBS?

Hi,
Settlement rule (For Partial Settlement i.e.Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC) will get populated once you do the Partial Settlement (i.e. Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC) through CJ88 / CJ8G.
Once you do the partial settlement you can see the settlement rule by Edit -
> Cost -
>Settlement rule.
By investment profile you can generate the AUC asset nos against the WBSE once you release the project. But those AUC asset no will only get reflected in settlement rule once you do the partial settlement (i.e. Moving the cost from WBSE to AUC).
Thanks & regards,
Pradip

Error message when doing settlement for Internal order

Hi,
Can someone please help me to resolve the following error:
When trying to run settlement for an internal order, following error message is generated:
Item 001 Order xxxxx budget exceeded
Message no. BP603
Diagnosis
Budget was exceeded by xxxx amount in document item 001 Order xxxxxx.
Also following points may be relevant:
- System status ISBD for Internal Order is active
- There is no PR/PO for the order, direct invoice from FI is created through tcode FB50
- Availability control: Activation Type 1, Overall field ticked in customization
- Tolerance Limits: Availability control action .... Usage 85 % - Warning message, Usage 100 % - Error message
Thanks,
Ankita

Hi Loong,
Thanks for reply.
I have already tried drilling down the report S_ALR_87013019 , however following are the only things available from the report.
1. There is a year independent overall budget for the order of 92500 amt.
2. Actual in 2009 is 7870.41 and in 2010 is 77980.24. So the total actual amt is 85850.65 overall.
3. The available budget is 6649.35. i.e Over budget minus actual utililized amounts.
Since, in the report it shows that the budget is available then I am unable to figure out why does it give error for exceeding budget by amt 50100.65 at the time of settlement.
Regards,
Ankita

IS Retail - Automatic evaluated receipt settlement for return items

Hello experts,
I'm in a new instalation of SAP Retail (ERP 2005).
Can anyone tell me how to use Automatic evaluated receipt settlement for return items?
I know that i have to check this box in the vendor master.
What i wanted to know is how does the system generates automatically debit notes to the vendor:
- Aren´t debit notes used exclusevily for SD module? If so, do i need to create the vendor in the costumer master and associate it to the vendor master?
- And after this, when i make the return to the vendor, the system generates the debit note automatically? how?
- for this process what do i need to do in spro?
Thank you in advance
Answers will be rewarded
Diogo

Dear Diogo,
You can use MRRL transaction code. Now, system will post credit memo
Bye,
Muralidhara

Periodic cost settlement for production order

Hello All,
Please explain me can we do Periodic cost settlement for production order in discrete manufacturing. If yes, how?
Thanks & Regards,
Alok Tiwari

WIP entry gets passed to accounts if the order is not in DLV or TECO status.
or else variance gets calculated.
Two GLs which gets hit are
Change in stock a/c Dr.
To Inventory Price Difference a/c Cr. or vice versa......
Regards,
Divraj

HT1918 i have just made my apple id.i have made this for itunes.after making my account i have problen with the review payment information as i do not use any credit cards and there is no option like NONE in review payment information. what should i do no

i have just made my apple id. i have made this for itunes. after making my account i have problem with the review payment information as i do not use any credit cards and there is no option like NONE in review payment information. what should i do now? to proceed further? plz help me!

How did you create the account ? If you followed the instructions on this page when creating it then you should have got the 'none' option : http://support.apple.com/kb/HT2534
e.g. on a computer's iTunes, if currently signed into an account then you logged out of it, and you then found a free app in the store and clicked on its free 'price' :
And then clicked on 'create Apple id' on the popup :
When I tried that process to create an account a few days ago I got the 'none' option on the payment details screen.
If you didn't use that process then you will need to create a new account using it (the instructions won't work with an existing account).

I am willing to buy the new ipad (wifi 4g), since i live outside of US and we dont have a LTE connection and CDMA based 3G carriers.. which version of iPad should i settle for?

i am willing to buy the new 3rd generation ipad (wifi+ 4g), since i live outside of US and we dont have a LTE connection and CDMA based 3G carriers.. which version of iPad should i settle for?
and isnt ipad supposedly locked to at&t and verizon????

They aren't locked in this edition for worldwide use. However I don't believe you can use an AT&T on Verizon and vice versa. If you have CDMA service you will need the Verizon iPad.
Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g/n)
Bluetooth 4.0 technology
Wi-Fi + 4G for AT&T model: LTE (700, 2100 MHz)3; UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
Wi-Fi + 4G for Verizon model: LTE (700 MHz)3; CDMA EV-DO Rev. A (800, 1900 MHz); UMTS/HSPA/HSPA+/DC-HSDPA (850, 900, 1900, 2100 MHz); GSM/EDGE (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz)
Data only4

Settlement for real CC with statistical IO for information

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for