Settlement in CJ88 after succesful results analysis on WBS

Dear All,
When I run CNE1 after i have estimated my PoC on my WBS project, this is succesful. I calculate the results analysis succesfully in KKA2 for my project. When i want to post the settlement of the RA, I receive errors such as "Maintain settlement rule on sender" and "the GL account needs a CO assignment".
My settlement rule is 100% PER and is maintained on every level of the WBS structure except one position which is the Receiver.
Any ideas?
Thanks Debora

Hello Debora
The Error   KD 205 is issued during settlement becasue  the results analysis is calculating costs of sales on line ID level.
Those costs of sales do add up to zero, but as settlement   is checking on line ID level, the message is issued.
To avoid that results analysis is calculating cost of sales if  you choose special function B in the valuation method (OKG3).
The system will then calculate negative WIP instead of reserves for
unrealized costs in the case of negative actual costs (see notes  365075 and 385616).
If you do want reserves for unrealized costs being calculated in the case of negative actual costs, but no costs of sales
(no error KD 205  when no settlement rule exists),
you could also change the method  of apportionment in OKG3 to 'I'. The reserves for unrealized costs
will then be apportioned in proportion to the actual costs, so no cost of sales will be calculated on line ID level.
hope this helps
Ger

Similar Messages

  • Results Analysis on WBS Element

    Hi Guys,
    Once we capture the costs on the WBS elements,
    Why do we carry out the results analysis on the WBS elements?? Pls explain.
    Do we carry out both results analysis and settlement simultaneously on WBS elements ..?
    Pls explain.
    Thanks
    Srik.

    Dear srikusap,
    When u carry the RA  through KKAX, then u can able to see the WIP for the WBS.  That is the reason we have to run RA.
    Raj

  • Result Analysis for WBS

    I can not use POC methods, since no plan data is available. 
    The WIP must be simply calculated as the difference between cost and revenue. 
    Any hints how to adjust CCM to post WIP not as an actual cost, but as a difference with Unearned Revenue?

    Hi PS user
    For PS there is an own forum, better to place your messages in there.

  • Results Analysis Settle Internal Order (from CRM) - No cost element allowed

    In SPRO results analysis configuration to "Define Posting Rules for Settlement to Financial Accounting" I am not allowed to use an account with a cost element.  (Error: I get error KQ 119 G/L account ### cannot be created as a cost element.)
    I configure a G/L account with no cost element.  KO88 Settlement posts to G/L account fine; however, does not post to the internal order because the config mentioned on first line does not allow me to use an account with a cost element. 
    Problem: I am unable to see settlement in KOB1 report because settlement goes to GL Account, but does not post to the internal order.
    Failed solution:  I tried to use OKC9 substitution at KO88 to substitute the internal order number.  The problem is that table AUFKV is empty when the substitution runs at KO88 settlement.  I am not able to substitute the order number because the order number isn't even available in the substitution at internal order settlement.
    I put a break manual break point in program GBTACCOB at the call to the substitution rule I defined.  The breakpoint stops at the substitution when I run KO88 settlement; however, fields are blank. I am unable to do substitution.  I know this works because I have a similar substitution on the same internal order for accounting indicator when doing an MB1A goods issue to an internal order.  The break point stops there and the AUFKV data is available for substitution rule.
    Question:
    Any suggested solutions to to have internal order update into KO88 settlement after KKA1 results analysis would be helpfull.

    It is more of a reporting issue really. 
    The problem is that internal order settlement with settlement profile instead of results analysis does post the settlement to the internal order and does use a cost element.  This is the business process the users currently have.  Our users have a requirement to settle the orders weekly.  This helps them find issues earlier and speeds up the month end close.
    In the past we could use KOB1 and see the current balance of an internal order and see the settlement.  Now that report no longer shows the settlement.  How can I see what has been settled on an order and what hasn't now?

  • Delete Result Analysis Data - KKA9

    Hi,
    After executing Result Analysis in KKAK for Sales Order, from KKA3 I was able to view the line items created.
    I deleted the Line items from KKA9 and was successful.
    But still I am able to view the old line items from KKA3.
    Please let me know why the line items are still existing in KKA3 even though the deletion was successfull.
    Thanks
    Satish

    Hi,
    Thanks for the reply.
    In KKA3 I was selecting from menu Result Analysis-->Display Line Items of RA which shows the RA Line items created.
    If we delete Line Items through KKA9 should the old data get completly deleted from KKAA.
    Thanks
    Satish

  • Reg the effect of result analysis kka2

    Hi All,
    I am doing some enhancement for transaction KKA2 where I am changing the cost elment value in my coding where can I see the new cost element that I have changed in the enhancement?I mean after doing result analysis where can I see the cost elment that it has posted(in this case the new cost element that I have changed)?
    Regards
    mahesh

    In order to comply with accounting standards, the value  of work completed on projects in progress need to be  capitalized. RA is  used for this  purpose.
    For cost based RA, first  calculate the percentage of completion (POC) = actual cost / plan cost * 100
    POC * actual revenue gives the revenue attributable to the work competed  so far (this is called calculated revenue). Compare calculated revenue and actual  revenue booked in GL. This difference in value is capitalized / accrued by SAP when  RA is properly configured.
    This is suitable for consturction projects.
    Revenue based:
    Here the starting point  is  revenue.
    POC = actua  revenue / plan revenue
    calculated cost = POC * plan cost.
    The difference between calculated cost and actual cost is capitalized / loss is recognized.
    Let me know if you have any questions.
    Sridhar

  • Result Analysis Settlement - Posting to FI

    Hi all
    I am configuring Result analysis related configuration to post WIP values to FI on period basis. I did following nodes configuration
    1.  Create Result Analysis Keys
    2.  Define Result Analysis Versions
    3.  Define Valuation Methods for Result Analysis
    4.  Define LIne ID
    5.  Define Assignment for Result Analysis
    6.  Define update for Result Analsysis
    7.  Define posting rules for Settlement to Finanacial Accounting
    We have RA connection with Projects
    After making all above configurations when we are performing KKA2 and CJ88, NO FI documents are getting posted and we are repeatedly getting message as there is no "Accrual" values. 
    We even not getting WIP values at KKA2, though we have eligble values at Project.
    we need to fix that at high priority...
    your inputs are highly appreciated..
    Kindly let me know, if any further clarifications required on this.
    best regards,
    S. Habib Pasha.

    Hi ,
    Based up on the above discussion did you executed any standard cost and revenue reports against the relevant WBS elements and verified that costs and revenue are flowing properly to the project ?
    In the RA are you able to see the WIP Values,Planned values and Actual values for COST and REVENUE ?
    And what are the parameters you maintained in  Settelement Profile ?
    Thanks,
    Sai.

  • Result Analysis(WIP) not posted after 4 cycle run

    Hi,
    Every month value is posted in Result Analysis GL account for WIP. But we found in period 10 and period 11 value is not posted Result Analysis GL account after running 4 cycle run (Overhead calculation, WIP calculation, Variance calculation and Settlement). What may be reason ??
    Regards,
    Samrat

    Hi Christian ,
    One question related to Cut-Off period regarding WIP calculation which myself and Ajay were discussing 15 days  back..
    Is it required to change the cut-off everymonth when we calculate WIP . In my client.. then donot do that .. but still we calculate the WIP..
    Is the significance of cut-off period is to tell the system the first period to calculate WIP .. during implementation .. My client never changes that and its in a MTS ( Process Order Senario )... but calculates WIP every month.
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Post Cost of Sales in PS after Result Analysis

    Hi SAP experts,
    I'm testing SAP EC&O best practice solution at this moment.
    I executed KKAJ (results analysis) and both Cost of Sales and WIP were calculated correctly.
    COS: for a TECO WBS, which already have billing document
    WIP: for other WBS which is still in progress.
    I already saved this results analysis, however, when I execute settlement (CJ8G), I can only find the posting to FI of WIP. (Dr GL WIP account/Cr P&L WIP account). My expect is to have COS posted to FI as well (to recognize COS for the billing of completed WBS above).
    Kindly help me to figure out what I was missing here? I don't know at what step COS will be posted to FI. I searched all configuration document in Best Practice but cannot find any configuration for Results Analysis & Settlement for COS account.
    Thanks so much for your help.
    Andy

    Zeketa,
    Look this with an ABAP consultant, this is an development.
    regards.
    Bruno Araujo

  • No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.

    No accounting document generated at time of result analysis settlement, but controlling document and profit center document are generated. problem is cost has been settled but accounting does not generated.
    i am asking at the time of  WIP calculation or settlement
    cost can be settled but does not generated any accounting document .

  • Results analysis and settlement for projects with Sales Order

    Hi Costing Gurus,
    We are implementing SAP for ECO business in ECC 6.0 with SD, FICO and PS modules and we have contracting jobs which will run for longer periods. we are planning to POC method based on actual cost and Progress billing methods in projects. my understanding is that Reasults analysis will be used to calculate the WIP, Reserves, Losses etc.. however revenue has to be recognized using sales and distribution module with (SD-BIL-RR) component. How ever i have started testing this scenario in test system and i have couple of clarifications and seeking some help from experts to correct my understanding.
    i have below questions.
    1. KKA* . results analysis only calculates the amounts (WIP, reserves, losses etc.) or it can update the accounting.
    2. i found from the blogs and online documents FI posting only happens through settlement and it specifies the Profitability segemnt should be used as receiver in Project . is it madatory to use profitablty segemnt. as we are not implementing COPA can i use any other object and what would be the impact of it.
    currenty i have selected update RA key and i could find no FICO documents created with that.
    3. Do i need to use Revenue recognition in SD along RA in controlling to get my accrual posting for recenues. RA can only serve Cost part of the project or it can Revenue accrual also ?
    Seeking expert suggestion on this.
    Thanks
    Murali

    Hello Murali-
    To answer your questions,
    1. When you perform Results analysis, it does not post any accounting documents. Results analysis only does calcuation of WIP etc and when you do corresponding settlement like CO88(production order) or VA88 (sales order), it will post accounting entries.
    2. It is not mandatory to have profitability segment as a receiver. If you are using COPA, then you would need to settle it to COPA in the end. For example in case of make to order environment, sales order can be used as  a cost object and hence the receiver would be a sales order where all the costs would get settled.
    Hope this helps.
    Shail

  • Results analysis for a project to be settled to sales order rather than PSG

    Hi Experts
    My client has two company codes.
    CC1 executes project construction for CC2. This is to be mapped as a customer project.
    As far as project settlement is concerned, since PA is not activated, it is proposed to settle to sales order item.
    In this situation, what would be effect of results analysis.
    With out PA, how the postings need to be handled with WIP, Reserves, Inventory and Revenue.
    warm regards
    ramSiva

    Hi,
    I have had this problem earlier, If PA is not abailable you have put in the settlement rule as not to be settled.
    And for the postings have to be managed using the GL accounts that we give in the result analysis configuration.  There is not much flexibility for customization here in this scenario. But you can do as much as possible using the diffrent result analysis categories.
    So for the reserves WIP inventory and revenue use result analysis category to segregate them by GL account
    Thanks
    Naveen

  • Result Analysis , Settlement and Revenue

    Dear Gurus,
    I really appreciate if you can help me in resolving the below issue.
    We are using results analysis and settlement processes in our project
    We want to recognize the revenue before billing.
    Is there any way I can post actual revene to financial accounting before doing
    billing through Settlement.
    I would be greatul to you guys if some one can help me at the earliest .
    Thanks,
    Viswas Anantharangachar

    Hi,
    In my understanding this is the requirement of Revenue recognition functionality implementation. This is more SD than PS function. Please use T-Code ‘VF44’ , or ‘VF47’.
    Please remember that the RR functionality was not enough stable in the ver 4.7 so you must have ECC5 in place.
    Enjoy SAP….
    Don’t forget to give points if its useful ans.
    Namskar,
    Ketan Dave

  • Results analysis for POC method with statistical cost element

    Hi,
    We are testing ETO (engineering-to-order) scenario With valuated
    project stock and cost based POC RA method.
    Inventory is updated during external procurement and we have used
    statistical cost elements (Cost element category - 90) for inventory G/L.We want to use a
    Result analysis method which considers this statistical cost elements
    for calculating POC.For this purpose we have implemented SAP Notes
    616960, 616869 and 78420.
    In short, as per SAP note 616869, we created a customer enhancement
    project for customer enhancement 5 of the results analysis (see Note
    H78420). We copied the source code for customer enhancement 5 of the
    correction instructions of note 616869 and then implemented SAP note
    616960 to read the statistical actual costs.
    Then we included the statistical cost as actual costs - Category K in
    OKG4.
    The system is doing POC and revenue in excess of billing calculation
    correctly after taking into consideration the posted statistical cost.
    During settlement of RA (CJ88), system is not giving effect to
    inventory value. On settlement of RA, revenue should be recognized but
    at the sametime the inventory represented by statistical posting should
    be consumed(COS). The system should post a P&L posting which reduces
    the inventory (representing statistical cost) and updates the actual
    costs on settlement.
    In our example, Statistical actual
    posting is of USD 57150, planned revenue USD 100000 and POC is 70.27%.
    Revenue in excess of billing comes to USD 70265.60. Recognisation of
    revenue of USD 70265.60 is not correct as actual consumption is yet to
    happen. The correct posting in FI should be revenue of USD 70265.60
    along with COS of USD 57150.
    Please suggest why on settlement the system is not posting the COS
    along with revenue recognised?
    Thanks,
    BK

    Hi Bijay,
    We are in a similar situation in one project.  Did you get any solution to the problem you posted here? If you can share it, please.
    Regards,
    Gireesh

  • Result Analysis Posting to FI incase of Projects.

    Dear All,
           What settings & steps need to be done to carry out postings for the result analysis data to FI in case of Projects.
           Thanx in advance.
    Regards,
    Santosh
    Message was edited by:
            Santosh Singh

    Hi,
    If there is no posting happening in FI then there could be some thing wrong in Cost element / G/L assignment as this will play major role in carrying cost / revenue from project to settlement receiver. Please cross-check your settlement configuration as this will carry calculated revenue / cost from project to FI. Please take the help of FI/CO consultant on this matter.
    After calculating revenue / cost through RA, the same will be settled to a receiver such as PSG / G/L etc. There is only one steps after RA i.e. project settlement
    If you want to post calculated revenue / cost into FI then calculated result after RA need to be settled to permanent cost object. However after RA, details can be obtained at project level.
    In order do settlement, you have to configure settlement profile of the project with allocation structure / PA transfer structure / source structre (if required) etc.
    The critical in settlement configuration is proper debit or and  credit account should be defined properly to carry out calculated revenue / cost from project to permanent cost object.
    Hope this will help you.
    Regards,
    Rakesh Pradhan

Maybe you are looking for

  • Safari 2.0.4 with upgrade to 10.4.11 wont work, help, please

    I am just beside myself. Safari wont work. I have broadband and all is well there, I've run disk warrior, all is well there. I've run disk first aid to check and verify disk. All well there. I upgraded to OS 10.4.11 from Upgrade on my g5, and safari

  • Problems With My New Ipod Nano 8Gb

    Like most got a new ipod Nano 8Gb for Christmas and I had previously installed Itunes and Quicktime to the latest versions. I hooked up the ipod and it was recognized and it said it wanted to update to version 103 which i allowed it to do. A bar came

  • Serving a textfile to Macintosh client

    Hi all, I'm trying to send a report created by a jsp page to the client and it works just fine on Windows machines. On Macintosh computers however all special characters (like scandinavian ���) are converted to something else. I know this is because

  • Deleting tabs

    I have a list of tabs in my Firefox browser on an IdeaTab2109 running Android 4. I think they are there from when I first set up the tablet and was suffering from finger trouble. How do I delete them? Clearing Private Data has no effect

  • Colour cells in ALV OOPS

    Hi Experts, Can any one solve my problem. I have displayed (grid display) using ALV OOPS using method (CL_GUI_ALV_GRID=>SET_TABLE_FOR_FIRST_DISPLAY) But I want colors should come on the list. Colors should be displayed Cell wise. Suppose for example