Settlement of PM order over Internal order

In order to control revenue budget from being over run we have developed Internal orders in controlling with the combination of Cost Centre & GL Code. The internal order are statistical in nature.
We are facing the following problem:
1. In PM order (IW31) settlement rule is defined as following:
                  1.1     CAT "Order"
                  1.2     Settlement Receiver "3440-2360010 3440"
                  1.3     Amount 1000
                  1.4     Settlement Type is Full
2. The problem occurs when there are different internal orders
3. After we run settlement rule (KO88) it runs successfully.
4. KSB1 report shows that the amount is split among all the settlement receivers
5. Whereas requirement is that amount against a particular internal order should be charged to its GL account and cost centre only.

Dear Sreenivas Kadiam,
I go to spro-----Plant Maintenance and Customer Service--Maintenance and Service Processing---Basic Settings----
General Order Settlement------Maintain Allocation Structures.
The following allocation structures are already defined:
A1     CO allocation structure
A2     No split
PM     PM allocation structure
PR     PARCO Allocation Structure
I could not find the (settlement cost elements setting should be 'BY COST ELEMENT' for receiver category ORD.)
Please advise
Regards
Aftab Ahmed Khan

Similar Messages

Settlement of PM order to Internal Order

Team
We wish to settle a PM order to a Statistical IO and a Cost center....
Is it possible ? Please advise.
Thanks
Cheers
Kartik

It is possible to settle the "real" order to a statistical order. (actual costs will be directed to the cost center)
All you have to do is create a settlement rule in real order that will point (settle) to the statistical order.
Ensure that the allocation structure that you will use will have a settlement receiver of CTR included since the cost center will
receive the actual costs.
Perform the settlement and costs will be directed to the actual cost center although the statistical order was used as a "receiver".
I hope it helps.
Pan

Settlement of Sale Order issue.

Dear friends
I am getting the following error while settling the Sale Order in VA88.
Please guide me in this issue, how to handle?
There are no accrued amounts; settlement is not possible.
Message no. KD256
Diagnosis
The sender has a results analysis key, but no accrued values.
Either the accrual was not yet started for the sender, or the values to be settled from the accrual equal zero.
Note
Actual costs are only settled once the sender is technically completed or finally delivered.
This applies to
Projects that cannot carry revenues
In Service Management for sales order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in sales order production) set in the accrual version for
Production orders
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management for engineer-to-order production to the indicator (Calculate WIP for orders in engineer-to-order production ) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
In Service Management to the indicator (Calculate WIP for internal and service orders with no revenues) set in the accrual version for
Internal orders with no revenues
Orders with no revenues
To the indicator (Calculate WIP for production orders without settlement to material) set in the accrual version for
Production orders without settlement to material
Procedure
1. If necessary, start the accrual calculation for the sender
2. Restart settlement

Now I am getting another error.
Complete PA transfer structure ZR
Message no. KD514
Diagnosis
There is no value field assignment for cost element 911400 / *_variance category COSR_* in PA transfer structure ZR, or
PA transfer structure ZR has no assignments, or
No "Origin" is maintained for the assignments in PA transfer structure ZR (cost element group and, if applicable, variance category)
When I see the Variance Category I didnt find any Variance Category COSR?
What could be the reason.
Thanks in advance
Kiran

Rebate settlement at Sales order level

Insight requested..
How to do rebate settlement at sales order level, generally rebate settlement is done after the invoice creation and with reference to accounting document.

Dear sud
The definition for rebate is A rebate is a special discount which is paid retroactively to a customer. This discount is based on the customer's sales volume over a specified time period.
Having said that if you are willing to give some discount to your customer, on the order itself, we can call it as DISCOUNT and it should not be called as REBATES.
For discounts, you can create a condition type and assign it to your pricing procedure.
Incidentally, can you please let me know what warrants you to ask this question. I am sure, the sales process won't be like that.
Thanks
G. Lakshmipathi

Error Message during settlement of Maintenance Order

Hi,
I was carrying out the month end settlement of Maintenance Order to Equipment specific Internal Order.
I am getting the follow error message for two order.
'balancing field profit center in line item 001 not filled message no. glt2201'
Can anyone plz explain me why this error is coming and how I can overcome this Error message
Thanks in Advance
Regards

Check these threads.
ko88 error-Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled
Error balancing field "Profit center" not found in line item 001

AUC Settlement through Invest Order

Hi
Could please explain me how the Investment order works and the settlement of the Investment Order by step by step.
Please help me I am in need
Thanks & Regards
Ramki

Hi
1) Create Investment Order, with AUC master record (KO01).
2) Created budget for Investment Order (KO22).
3) Release the Investment Order in control data tab (KO02).
4) G/L Posting to Investment Order with amount 200$.(FB60)
5) AUC Settlement (KO88). (System created the settlement rule AUTO in KO02 here).
6) Created Final asset for settling from AUC (AS01).
7) Internal Order for AUC is "technically complete" so the system will perform 'full settlement' during next order settlement run.
Reg
Suresh

Why we create settlement profile. What master data must exist in sap before creating settlement profile for order.

Why we create settlement profile. What master data must exist in sap before creating settlement profile for order.

As mentioned above, settlement is to post the cost to cost centers or any possible receivers as per the settlement profile. PM / Service orders, WBS elements, etc., can be temporary cost bearers from which cost should be settled to some permanent receivers.
Cost elements / Cost element groups should be available as Master data before configuring settlement profile.
To answer your latest query, there are 2 type of cost centers.
Sender Cost Center - Against this, labor / internal activity price will be maintained in KP26. This cost center will be maintained in PM / PP work centers. While creating PM / PP orders, one of the work centers & activity types will be mentioned. Based on the KP26 entry for the combination of Activity type & Sender cost center, price will be picked & calculated according to work hours / labor hours maintained in PM / PP orders.
Receiver Cost Center - Receiver cost center is the department / location cost center to which cost should be settled. Only receiver cost center will be maintained in settlement profile. Sender cost centers will be picked up automatically from work center.

Settlement of Work Order

Hi All ,
Is it possible to settle a work order on WBS Activity Element.
I am able to settle it on WBS Activity but not on Activity element.
Rahul.

HI Rahul
You can settle the order in Activity Element.
Activity element comprises of Internal processing , External processing , Costs and Service
How to do this ?
Create a Network, under network you will have activities, under activities you have create Activity elements.... It resembles same as activites...
Enter a short text... enter the require fields... then...
Select the activity element, click Edit - Cost - Settlement Rule... Maintain the settlement rule for order...
I hope this can be done..
- Pithan

Validation durng maintenance of Settlement Rule for Orders

Is there a way to set up validation during maintenance of settlement rules for orders? Is it via OKC7? How do you do it?

Dear Noel,
there are no standard functionality which will make the entry
of a settlement rule required in TS KO01 other than having a "required" valid settlement receiver in the settlement profile you have assigned to the order type in TS KOT2_OPA, (you can change the settlement profile in TS OKO7).
Then you will receive an error message in TS KO01 if you try to save an internal order without a settlement rule. This is the system design.
However, you also have the possibility to automatically fill the
settlement rule of an order either via a reference order (or model
order. TS KOM2), which you assign to to the order type in question, or you can check the standard enhancement COOM0003, (user exit EXIT_SAPLKOBS_001).
You can also read the documentation of this user exit in TS SMOD.
Regards,
CG

Settlement of Sale Order to Sale Order

Dear experts
I need help in the following scenario:
At my client place we are doing job work for external material. All the material are supplied by the customer and our client will do the processing and send it back to customer's customer on customers request.
To create Excise Invoice against the Customers Customer we are handling through 2 sale orders.
First One Sale order will be created against the Customer Order and Sale price will be the selling price of Customers to Customer.
Second Sale Order will be created for Job Work Charges for the processing the materials.
On settling the process orders all the cost is settling to Sale Order One, Clients revenue is coming from Sale Order Two.
Here I need to settle the First Sale Order to Second Sale Order. I have given the second sale Order number in first sale order number in Settlement rule.
But when I settle the First sale Order all the amount it going to Price Differance Account.
How to settle the Cost of First Sale Order to Second Sale Order?
Regards
Kiran A

Dear Experts
any advises.
Can I go for Sale Order to Sale Order Settlement ?
Regards
Kiran

Settlement of Investment Order - Auto creation of Sub asset for settlement

< MODERATOR: Message locked. Please post this in the [ERP Financials - Asset Accounting|SAP ERP Financials - Asset Accounting;. >
Dear experts
Request your help on Investment orders settlement.
We are doing settlement of Investment orders to sub asset numbers, where sub assets are created well in advance.
Our client want system to create sub asset numbers automatically, while doing the settlement of Investment orders itself.
Is it possible ?, If possible, please let me know, what are the settings I need to do to meet this requirement.
Thanks in advance
S. Habib Pasha.

Hiya,
Go to IMG --> Controlling --> IO --> Actual Postings --> Settlement --> Automatic Generation of Settlement Rules.
There is no SAP Standard created for settlements to sub-assets, so you'll need to create one using option 4 there "User-Defined Strategies for Automatic Generation ...".
Once this is done, get an ABAP Developer to code the settlement rule by creating a custom project in that same transaction. The rule will be similar to the SAP Standard ones created in option 1 of the same node.
Once this is done, create strategy sequences for this, and assign to Order Type(s).
If your users can maintain a basic investment profile when creating the Order Master Data, the developer can be directed to pick that data (aka fields) for the creation of the subasset number.
Hope this helps.
Cheers.

MTO - Settlement of Sales Order to COPA

Hi,
We have a scenario wherein production order is created with reference to Sales order.
No standard / Sale order BOM is maintained. As such no cost estimate is available for either Header material or sales order. Header material does not have any value.
Goods are issued to production order with reference to such sales order, as special stock. So consumption posted to Sales order.
Revenue is captured on Sales order.
At this point of time, can I settle the sales order through VA88. What all will it settle.
Is RA excution a must for VA88 settlement?
Please suggest.

HI,
if you need to have WIP-value posting, result analysis is a must before settlement.
Best regards, Christian

Problem in settlement of rework order

Hi
I have raised a production order and settled all the products in the order. But in quality inspection i have cleared only some quantity and made some quantity rework. I have raised a rework order for the same and settled the rework order.But the quantity is not settled to the main production order.Where is the problem in the rework order
Regards,
PradeepM.

Hi Pradeep,
Are you expecting
1. the rework cost in the rework order to be settled to the parent order or
2. the confirmed quantity in the rework order to be added to the parent order.
Up to my knowIedge I dont think the 2nd point will happen.
Let us confirm with other Experts opinion.
BR,
UK

Settlement of process order in G/L account

Dear Guru
In our client scenario for FG we are using "V" as price control. During settlement of process order the variance amount is hitting in the "stock of fg produce" + and "cogm" - ve entry.
but our client need the variance (balance) of order to be hit in separate G/L account in steed of cost of goods manuf.
In OBYC for transaction "GBB" in which general modification we need to assign the req g/l account.
if i am wrong pl give me some solution to solve the above requirement.
i know that if price control "s" is used it will hit price diff account.
if any other details required pl reply.
regards
vinoth
Edited by: vinoth on Jul 15, 2010 11:59 AM

Check GBB/AUA. If GBB/AUA is not maintained, then it will use GBB/AUF.
Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 15, 2010 6:34 PM
Edited by: ayethebing on Jul 15, 2010 6:36 PM

Settlement of Process order aginst the Sale Order

Dear friends
This the scenario with respect to product cost by sale order settlement profile. When I am settling the process order, which is created with reference to Sale order, system throwing an error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type SDI".
When I see the explanation given by system, the following message displayed :
"Diagnosis
In allocation structure Z1 (controlling area RI01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type SDI.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure Z1.""
For this I have defined one Secondary cost element and assigned to Allocation Structure under Settlement cost elements.
Still I am getting the error. What could be the reason?
Please do the needful.

Hi Kiran
In the Allocation Structure Z1, you need to define the Settlement cost element for the receiver category SDI. Have you done that? Cost element should be created with 21 Cost element category.
Dont Select By Cost element.
Regards,
Suraj

Settlement of process order

In PP-PI We want to use active ingredient for scenario:
Our Raw material is MINING ORE which will have varying proportion of COPPER & COBALT.
Valuation of ORE is based on itu2019s content of COPPER & COBALT content. So we will use active ingredient to capture value of this raw material based on it content of CU & CO.
Now when we issue this material for production to process order, our semi finished output ( Say SFG1) will also have varying content of COPPER & COBALT based on kind of input quality. There will several process orders doing diff. processe.
Now my query is
1)     Can we settle the process order variance to COPPER & COBALT content of SFG1 instead of normal settlement to SFG1?
2)     Can I maintain my valuation of SFG1 based on COPPER & COBALT content?
3)     Do we have any user exit or BADI available to replace SFG1 with CO& CU in process order settlement rule?
4)     In standard cost estimate can we capture COPPER & COBALT characteristics?
Ultimately COPPER & COBALT are our finished goods.
I try to search sap help but not much info to help me on this.
Your input will be highly appreciated.
Nitesh

Hi,
The concept explained is typically a co-product scenario:
Ore produces SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT. SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT produce FIN COPPER and FIN COBALT.
This scenario is covered under u2018CO-PROUDUCTu2019 concept. Here Ore is Raw Material, SEMI COPPER and SEMI COBALT are SEMI-PRODUCT and finally COPPER and COBALT are Finished Product.
Now estimate the standard cost for your SEMI-PRODUCTS and FINISHED PRODUCTS using integrated BOM. Sit with your PP Consultant who can give you good input for costing the products whether based on quanity yield or quality yield.
Once this is tested and found the results are expected, the solution can be freezed.
Please let me know your feed back.
Regards,
Ashok

Settlement of PM order over Internal order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for