Settlement receivers

Good Afternoon, I need help trying to figure out how to run a report on settlement receivers?

I am running SAP 710 " ERP R/3 PRODUCTION ".  I want to run a report to make sure all defaulted settlement receivers have been changed to the manual settlement receiver I am imputing in its place. I am just looking for a Transaction number to run report,
I want to review all my work orders .Need to verify all settlement receiver has been changed with new with out having to go into each individual work order.
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • How to change settlement receivers in internal order

    Hi
    Internal order holds costs date back to previous year. I would like to perform settlement to the Cost Center and will perform Manual reposting from Cost center to the order in current fiscal year.
    To perform this in order master data under settlement rule receivers are assets. I would like to add cost center as settlement receiver.
    Any one help me on this how to change settlement receivers.
    Useful aswers will be rewarded with points
    Regards
    Prasad

    My problem is solved in the other way,,,,,,,i have settled costs date back to 2006 to the cost center and from cost center manually posted the to the order
    and performed order settlement in 2007.
    so previous year balance has been carried to the present year

  • Query to Display Settlement Receivers for Maintenance Items

    I am looking for a way to get a query/list display that shows me our maintenance plans, maintenance items and the settlement receiver.  Looked in all the obvious spots and the actual receiver is not available.  In the maintenance plan you can get the field that tells you there is a settlement rule but not the actual receiver.  In the order list display you cannot get the information either.
    Has anyone had this requirement and if so, what may have been the solution.

    Greetings Linda,
    The Settlement Rules are saved in the tables COBRA & COBRB. Get your Maintenance Plan Object Number from table MPOS and join on the field OBJNR using an SAP Query.
    (SQVI or SQ00)
    Also, note that these will be copied to the created Orders and the actual settlement only happens for the Orders. The settlement rule of the Maintenance Item is only a template, no actuals are involved.

  • Report on Settlement - Project wise/ WBS element wise

    Hello Friends,
    I am looking for a report on settlement which will include the senders - Projects or WBS elements and Settlement receivers and the amount settled in the any period for a particular fiscal year.
    Your response will be rewarded.
    Vishal.

    Hi,
    Pls refer CJIC and CJID.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Automatic settlement rule creation

    Hello Guru's,
    I have a scenario of capital proejcts. Were I create Assets with the help of Investment profile at the top(1st level) WBS element. Now my requirment is the cost of the second level WBS should be rolled upto top level WBS element. To do this I have to manually create settlement rule for all second level WBS to settle at top level. I have to create this rule automatically throught CBJ2 tcode.
    As per SAP Note 211324 I have  Implemented the modification. Now I have Insert value '5' with short text 'Superior WBS element'. Also have assign the strategy to Acct. Assign element. This strategy is also assigned to settlement profile. Also have assigned this settleemnt profile to project profile.
    Now, when i run CJB2 tcode for my project the system issues me an error :-
    Error(s) during creation of settlement rule
    Message no. ORB509
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
    System Response
    Processing stopped.
    Procedure
    Check whether the:
    Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
    Settlement profile ZPI03 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
    Please throw some light on this error
    Regards,
    Tushar

    Thanks Virendra,
    Thanks for your reply but tell me after the implementation of note do I need to implement BADI also as in past for some forums you have mentioned???
    Regards,
    Tushar

  • Error during automatic settlement rule creation

    Hi Gurus,
    For the investment project, I maintained as follows, first level WBSE - Only planning element - no settlement. 2nd level WBSE - settled to AuCs. For level three & below settled to Superior WBSE. I had created the Settlement type with '5'. When I am executing CJB2 to create the Settlement rules automatically, I am getting the following error message for level 3 & below WBSE.
    Enter a valid value for the settlement type :
    Message no. KD199
    Diagnosis
    The system found a settlement type settlement type in the settlement rule which either does not exist or is unsuitable for the sender.
    Procedure
    If possible, enter a suitable settlement rule.  Remember that the rules for preliminary settlement ("PRE") of capital investment measures are different from those for period settlement ("PER") of other settlement senders.  Periodic settlement only makes sense for capital investment measures.  They must not have any "PER" rules.
    To enter an investment profile (in the control data for an order or WBS element) or to remove it.  However, first delete the PER or PRE rules (in the settlement rule) and er zu in internal orders, you can first change the investment profile and then adapt the rules before you save.
    Error(s) during creation of settlement rule :
    Message no. ORB509
    Diagnosis
    Errors occurred during the check on settlement receivers.
    System Response
    Processing stopped.
    Procedure
    Check whether the:
    Specific receiver Account assignment e actually exists
    Settlement profile Z7 permits account assignment to the specified receiver
    can anyone help me where I am making mistake or what is the procedure to be adopted for such scenario.
    somebody else also had discussed the same issue in this forum but there is no answer for this.
    thanks in advance
    Vinodh

    hi Sreenivas,
    Thanks for your reply,
    I tried this, system is giving the following error now
    Could not find a superior WBS element for WBS element
    Message no. CJ115
    Diagnosis
    The system could not find a superior element for a WBS element while it was executing the function 'Derive structure'
    System Response
    Processing stopped.
    What  could be the reason ?
    thanks in advance,
    Vinodh

  • Settlement of PM order over Internal order

    In order to control revenue budget from being over run we have developed Internal orders in controlling with the combination of Cost Centre & GL Code. The internal order are statistical in nature.
    We are facing the following problem:
    1. In PM order (IW31) settlement rule is defined as following:
                      1.1     CAT "Order"
                      1.2     Settlement Receiver "3440-2360010  3440"
                      1.3     Amount 1000
                      1.4     Settlement Type is Full
    2. The problem occurs when there are different internal orders
    3. After we run settlement rule (KO88) it runs successfully.
    4. KSB1 report shows that the amount is split among all the settlement receivers
    5. Whereas requirement is that amount against a particular internal order should be charged to its GL account and cost centre only.

    Dear Sreenivas Kadiam,
    I go to spro-----Plant Maintenance and Customer Service--Maintenance and Service Processing---Basic Settings----
    General Order Settlement------Maintain Allocation Structures.
    The following allocation structures are already defined:
    A1     CO allocation structure
    A2     No split
    PM     PM allocation structure
    PR     PARCO Allocation Structure 
    I could not find the (settlement cost elements setting should be 'BY COST ELEMENT' for receiver category ORD.)
    Please advise
    Regards
    Aftab Ahmed Khan

  • Project Systems - Report on WBS and Settlement recievers

    Need help in searching for any PS report wherein I can get list of WBS elements along with the settlement receivers defined in the settlement rule.
    Or else how can we get such a report.

    Hi
    Check the Table <b>COBRB</b> you can achieve this results
    in which the WBS element is there(PS_PSP_PNR) for the settlement rules
    If needed refer other PS tables like
    PROJ,PRPS
    and for costs BPEJ table
    Regards
    Anji

  • Track P.O.no.against Asset created via AUC settlement

    Hi Friends,
    We have a scenario wherein an AUC is populated in a P.O.as account assignment object. Goods Receipt entries are made for these P.O.s and the AUC gets values therefrom. This AUC is then settled to a Final Asset.
    We would like to know whether there is any way to track the P.O.no.against the Final Asset. This maybe through a report, or through some table entries.
    There's a t code AIAZ, but it tracks only the asset mentioned in the P.O., which in our case is the AUC. Table EKKN also tracks the account assignments for Purchase Orders.
    Let's say the AUC has 40 line items, whereas there are 5 Final Assets as settlement receivers.When the settlement entries are made from AUC to Final Asset, 5 entries will be generated in the foreground, but can we see the entries generated internally by the system, as in to see how the system has allocated values?
    Regards,
    Varun

    Hi Preeti,
    The t code FIAAIN_PO_TRACK mentioned above does not exist in our system. Does it need to be developed?
    Regards,
    Varun

  • How settlement rule will be created for Sales order with cost object

    Dear Experts,
    We are using product cost by sales order with valuated stock. In addition we are not using COPA
    We also consume some materials at sales order level and at the end of month we want to do the result analysis and settlement for the same amount. In this case can any on explain how system will behave regarding settlement of sales order cost and what entries will get pass in the system.
    In our case we have done below activities...
    we have created sales order,
    All production order activities completed till final GRN including month end activities
    Material consumption against sales order
    Result analysis executed
    At the time of sales order settlement, system throwing error (Sender doesn't have valid receiver, please create settlement rule for sender object)
    Then i checked in sales order there sales order settlement rule not defined.
    I guess this settlement rule need be generated by system automatically. If not, please let me know the process of it.

    HI kishore
          the reason is that sale order always carry the revenue  and production order and production period carry the cost .
       cost you can settle to the Material and even management want  to be settle the cost to material only in production order OR period
    but in sales order  when u sell the product it carry the revenue not the cost and management want see and analysis based on profitability segment are profit center level .
    Prerequisites
    If CO-PA is active, the system generates a settlement rule when you create the sales order. The settlement rule determines whether data is settled to other objects or other areas in Controlling. In accordance with this settlement rule, the relevant data is settled to CO-PA.
    If CO-PA is not active, create a settlement rule. This settlement rule that you create manually normally contains a G/L account as a receiver (such as 399999). You can also settle costs and revenues or results analysis data to objects with revenue.
    You can also settle the cost of sales calculated in results analysis to a fixed asset or a cost center. To do this, you must add to the allocation structure the results analysis cost elements under which the cost of sales is updated to the order.
    The settlement rule includes a distribution rule for the sales order item. The distribution rule is made up of a settlement receiver, a settlement share, and a settlement type:
    The settlement receiver (such as profitability segment or G/L account) specifies the object to which the actual costs and revenue of the sales order item are settled. The settlement receiver can be proposed through the settlement profile.
    The settlement share defines the percentage or the equivalence numbers used to distribute the costs to the individual settlement receivers. The settlement share for sales order items is usually 100%. A settlement share of 100% is preset in the system.
    The settlement type specifies full settlement of the sales order item. This ensures that all the data on the sales order is available for results analysis.
    Settlement still takes place in each period. The revenues and the cost of sales are transferred to CO-PA by period, and the work in process and the reserves are transferred to FI.

  • Maintenance Order is not settling

    Hi Seniors - While settling the maintenance order, error is coming "Settlement rule is not distributed". Its working for some order types and for some its not working.
    Kindly assist me in finding the right node where these settings are maintained. I am unable to figure out...
    Thanks & Regards
    Manmohan K Bajaj

    Hi
    Are there more than 2 settlement receivers in the settlement rule?
    if yes, you need to maintain a % allocation between the two
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Internal order: multiple settlement

    Hi all,
    I need to settle one particular cost element from an internal order to a cost center. All the remaining cost elements should be then settled to another receiver. I can have several settlement receivers but only one allocation structure.
    I can use assessment or distribution but the aim is to have all these values in the "Credit from settlement" part of standard reports.
    Any idea on how to achieve this?

    Hi John
    you need to use source structure with 2 separate parts as shown below (1 for cost elements to cc and the second for others)
    then create allocation structure with the same logic (for each one of the parts mentioned)
    and then use them to a settlement profile. When you maintain the order and specifically the settlement rule you need to attach the respective source structure to each one of the receivers of your order. (that means 2 lines one for cc with associated source structure and a second line with second source to other objects)
    Hope it helps
    Panagiotis

  • How to display previous settlement rules (CJ70)

    Hi,
    Is there any transaction code to view the list of settlement rule from CJ70.
    We settle from 1 WBS - 1 AUC - many Fixed Assets
    After I made final settlement rules in CJ70 and run CJ88, the lines of settled items are gone. How to display the list of previous final settlement rules (i.e this WBS has been settled to what assets)
    Currently, I could get the list from FBL3N, find the GL posting with WBS number, click Original Document then it will display previous settlement. Then I click settlement rules and it will display previous settlement rules. Any other way besides FBL3N? Because it will only display rules from particular WBS and I have to find the GL posting first.

    Go to CNS41/CN41. Select the WBS Element for which you want to see the settlement rules. Then Click on the Settlement Rule button. This will dispaly all the settlement receivers. i.e to AUC as well as the multiple  Fixed Assets.
    Hope it helps..
    Seek for some points if it helps.
    Thanks

  • In which table may I find the settled values from the WO's settlement

    Hello Expert,
    Can anyone be so kind an let me know In which table may I find  the value of settled costs from Work Order broken donwn into Settlement Receivers?
    I have found the table COBRB where I'm able to see the settlement rules for the WO but where the values from settlement are stored?
    Thank you in advance for valubale answers.
    Regards:
    Lukasz Kurlit

    Hello Kolla,
    I was too quick with my last answer, still I have the problem with this relation between COBRB and COEP, let me clarify it again.
    In WO I have manually modified the settlement rule that way that I settled costs split into two Cost Centers.
    Both lines regarding settlement rules are visible in table COBRB.
    Then I have  found in COEP table that there are stored exact values regarding settlement for both Cost Centers, one value for one Cost Center but without any key shows which one refers to which Cost Center (I recognized it after values which were settled in different time and after modification of settlement rule)
    What I need now is to find the relationship between COBRB and COEP that way that I will be able to know clearly (for reporting purpose) which line from COEP refers to which Cost Center recorded in COBRB.
    Link via OBJNR gives me only both lines in COEP without knowledge which one is from which Cost Center, there is no such field which will indicate which Cost center is hidden behind the value.
    I will be very appreciated for any hints how to find it.
    Regards:
    Lukasz Kurlit

  • Change in  item category  and  settlement of  old sales order not possible

    Hi
    I   have to settle   sales orders  in VA88 and  transfer data to COPA.   I  want to do   directly  without  result  analysis. So, in the  item category, I  removed the result analysis key.   And  the  settlement  goes thru.
    My issue is that  there are  orders in  July 2010  which  have to be settled,  but  it  does not work since the  changes in  item category has  happened  this month in Aug 2010 and  the  July  sales order are also  invoiced.
    Pl  suggest a  solution  to  settle  the  July  sales order  to COPA.
    Thanks
    kamala

    Hi Kamala
    I see only one possibility... The old sales order consists of some GL accounts posted in it which is not mapped in the allocation structure...
    Alloc Str has 2 parts - i.e. One, it consists of a group of cost elements it has to handle and Two, it consists of the valid settlement receivers like PSG, CTR, etc
    You say, this alloc str works well with new sales orders.... The 2nd part of alloc structure (i.e. valid receivers) applies equally to all sales orders.. But what can really differentiate the 2 sales orders is the cost elements posted on it...
    I dont foresee any other posslbe reason
    Regards
    Ajay M

Maybe you are looking for