Settlement Rule based on FL cost center

Hi Guys,
My client wants CC to be maintained in the Functional location and they don't want to maintain in the Equipment.
Their Requirement is, when ever a person creates the Maintenance order for any equipments attached to the Functional location,Settlement rule should gets created automatically based on the CC maintained in the FL.
But in standard it creates automatically when CC is maintained in the Equipment.
How to handle this scenario.Is there is any Customer exit to handle this scenario?
Pl guide me
Regards
ISWARI

Dear Mr Thiyagarajan,
I really appreciate your immediate response for any threads.
Here they want to create order based on equipment(for analysis of cost through MO) and want settlement should be on the CC of FL.Hence they don't want to maintain CC in Equipment master and want to maintain CC in FL.
As you said ,If I maintain Cost center in FL and not maintain Cost Center in Equipment master,then while MO creation in location tab all data's were copied from equipment and CC field is empty.Hence while releasing the order,system asks for settlement rule.
How to make the system to copy the FL cost center to the location tab of order.Pl suggest if there is any exit/badi
Regards
ISWARI

Similar Messages

IO settlement rule to GL and cost center

we have expense occured as foolows:
Dr: Expense acc1---cost center A 1000 USD
Cr: AP 1000 USD
we want to use IO Z001 to collect 1000, we want IO settlemnt to be:
Dr: expense acc2 1000 USD
Cr: IO 1000 USD
Dr: expense acc1 500 USD
Cr: expense acc2 500 USD
can this kind of settlement rule be designed

try as mentioned below.
1) Dr: Expense acc1---cost center A 1000 USD
Cr: AP 1000 USD
Option 1:
Dr: Expense acc1---cost center A 1000 USD, and also to IO ( Real posting to IO, statistical posting to cost center )
Cr: AP 1000 USD
2) we want to use IO Z001 to collect 1000, we want IO settlemnt to be:
Dr: expense acc2 1000 USD
Cr: IO 1000 USD
Option:
Maintain Expenses acc2 as Category 22 - external settlement.
3) Dr: expense acc1 500 USD
Cr: expense acc2 500 USD
Option :
Pass manual general entry

Can i settle one order to different cost center

Hi experts
pls solve my problem
i posted some expenditure to one order
one order expenditure : salaries 2500, rent 1500 , Travelling exp 3500
here i need post salaries to cost center admin-1001
and i need to post rent , travelling to cost center Markeing-2001
is it possible or not
if , how tell me the process
Regards
Rams

Hello Rams
What ever the settlement u r going to do in IO are dependent on the settlement rule u have defined in SETTLEMENT PROFILE in KOA1
whereu have to
activate the check box %
activate the amount settlement - activate,.
the radio button to be settled in full to be activated.
U can settle the costs of the orders partly to diffrent cost centers as required. ( as u have explained)
again u check it out in KOT2 ( creation of order type) wheather u have activated
CO PARTNER ACTIVATED X ( active)
Hope u would be able to solve the problem
Expecting some valuable points if it is useful
Thanks

Re: Oracle 8i (8.1.7.4) Rule based v/s Cost based

Hi,
I would like to know the advantages/disadvantages of using RULE based optimizer v/s COST based optimizer in Oracle 8i. We have a production RULE based database and are experiencing performance issues on some queries sporadically.
TKPROF revealed:
call     count       cpu    elapsed             disk                  query                current              rows
Parse        0      0.00       0.00                0                      0                      0                      0
Execute      3     94.67    2699.16            1020421            5692711            51404               0
Fetch       13    140.93    4204.41            688482             4073366          0                      26896
total       16       235.60    6903.57           1708903           9766077            51404               26896
Please post your expert suggestions as soon as possible.
Thanks and Regards,
A

I think the answer you are looking for is that Rule Based optimizer is predictive, but Cost Based optimizer results may vary depending on statistics of rows, indexes, etc. But at the same time, you can typically get better speed for OLTP relational databases with CBO, assuming you have correct statistics, and correct optimizer settings set.

Partitioning on Oracle 8i (Rule Based vs. Cost Based)

At my current engagement, we are using Oracle Financials 11.0.3 on Oracle 8.0.6. The application uses rule-based optimizer. The client wants to implement Oracle partitioning. With this in mind, we are concerned about possible performance issues that the implementation of partitioning may cause since RBO does not recognize it.
We agree that the RBO will see a non-partitioned table the same as a partitioned. In this scenario where you gain the most is with backup/recoverability and general maintenance of the partitioned table.
Nevertheless, we have a few questions:
When implementing partitions, will the optimizer choose to go with Cost base vs. Rule base for these partitioned tables?
Is it possible that the optimizer might get confused with this?
Could it degrade performance at the SQL level?
If this change from RBO to CBO does occur, the application could potential perform poorly because of the way it has been written.
Please provide any feedback.
Thanks in advance.

If the CBO is invoked when accessing these tables, you may run into problems.
- You'll have to analyze your tables & ensure that the statistics are kept up to date.
- It's possible that any SQL statements which invoke the CBO rather than the RBO will have different performance characteristics. The SYSTEM data dictionary tables, for example, must use the RBO or their performance suffers dramatically. Most of the time, the CBO beats the RBO, but applications which have been heavily tuned with the RBO may have problems with the CBO.
- Check your init.ora to see what optimizer mode you're in. If you're set to CHOOSE, the CBO will be invoked whenever statistics are available on the table(s) involved. If you choose RULE, you'll only invoke the CBO when the RBO encounters situations it doesn't have rules for.
Justin

Cost Allocation based on receiving cost center

Hi All,
I have a uniqure requirement. I have 1 producing cost center A and i have two main cost centers Z1 & Z2. I use KB21N for activity allocation and i use sending cost center A and receiving cost center Z1 for 100 hours and Z2 for 200 hours at $2 per hour for activity type labor. The entry posted is credit cost center A and debit cost center Z1 & Z2. At month end i end up over/under absorption of $5000 in cost center A, and i need to allocate this over/under absorption of $5000 to cost center Z1 and Z2 based on the actual consumption from cost center A. This can be done easily, based on the secondary cost element cost of the activity type, BUT the catch is cost center Z1 & Z2 also get costs for the labor cost element from other cost center too. For example cost center Z1 as labor cost element of $500 in total out which it has $200 from cost center A and rest from other cost centers, if i allocate the over/under absorption of $5000 based on the total $ values on the secondar cost element, it takes the total of labor cost element for allocation, that is $500 for basis of allocation. SKF also does
How can we address this issue, can it be done apart from assessment? Please let me know

Hi,
Hi assign or select Revnue field in the sort key figure and the system will allocate cost based its revenues for each product.
Thanks.
S.SUbbiah

Rule based optimizer vs Cost based optimizer - 9i

Is Rule based optimizer not used any more or can be used depending on the application etc.
I think Rule based optimizer still has some advantages. Please give your input if you think otherwise.
Thx

I think Rule based optimizer still has some
advantages. Please give your input if you think
otherwise.You are absolutely correct. There are a few advantages to RBO.
RBO is better for any application that meets the following criteria:
- designed for Oracle version 7;
- has not been updated since Oracle 7;
- was hand tuned in Oracle 7;
- will not be upgraded to Oracle Database 10g (where RBO is obsolete);
- will not use Bitmap Indexes, Materialized Views, Query Rewrite, or vitrtually anything that was introduced in Oracle8 and beyond.
CBO, while not perfect, will allow new features to be used. And it is improving with every release.

Cost center not appearing while settling to GL Account using AIAB

Hi
There is one AuC 100000019. There are two values: Rs.10000 and Rs.145500
Now i want to settle it to GL account using AIAB.
In AIAB under Category field, i gave GL (i.e. GL account as Category). Then i mentioned GL Account as settlement receiver. Then i double clicked on the settlement rule line and specified cost center (same as assets)
While settling using TCOde AIBU, it gave error, and asked for CO object. I do not know why its not picking cost center even though i specifically gave the cost center.
Please let me know what can be done
Thnx
Deepak

Hi Deepak,
What was the resolution here? I know the implementing Note 744194 does not fix this issue. I am thinking 2 possible scenarios:
1. If the cost center for AuC settlement to GL is going to be the same each time, then a GL account can be specifically setup for the purpose of this settlement and the Cost Center can be defaulted via OKB9.
2. If the Cost Center differs, then as you mentioned: It cannot be defaulted.
I am encountering the same issue, please share anything that you can.
Thank you,
Yhuss

GR/IR expenses not affected with the settlement rule run process in the GL

Please neglect by previous post with the same title
There is a problem I face while running the settlement rule process related to internal orders on the GR/IR expenses.
According to the internal order settlement rule every expense associated to an Internal order no. whether its an account payable or manual journal accounts it should be settled (distributed) on the cost centers specified in each internal order after the monthly settlement run process is done through T.Code "KO8G", and this actually happens on the entries that are booked manually through T.Code "FB50", but the GR/IR entries is the biggest problem, it didn't reflect the settlement rule distributions in the GL it just gives me the original transaction once its was automatically created through T.Code "MIGO" they are only allocated to a one profit center with no cost center and without being distributed to a multiple cost centers according to the distribution strategy.
After a long search I found that the cost center distribution occurred only on a secondary none GL account named A&P Settlement (720010), all GR/IR expenses was settled correctly only on this account not through the ordinary GL accounts (e.g. Gifts, printed materials) and of course the correct distribution didn't appear in the GL,
So is there a transaction or any way to allocate the GR/IR expenses to there correct cost centers with the correct cost element in the GL?
Is there anything to do with the GR/IR calculation that depends on quantity base not value base?
The Process as follows:
(1) Creating Internal order with a settlement rule (E.g. Cost center 1 (50%) Cost center 2 (50%)
2) Creating a purchase order associated to an internal order
3) The Goods received and creating the GR transaction T.Code "MIGO"
Acc/DR Expenses accounts
Acc/CR GI/IR Account 400301
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)

4) Closing the GR/IR accounts when receiving the invoice T.Code "MIRO"
When we receive vendor invoice:
Acc/Dr GI/IR Account 400301
Acc/Cr Vendor Account
Profit enter ###### (eg. 111177)
Cost Center <blank>
Internal order no. ####### (e.g. 9810512)
5) Performing the Internal order settlement rule run process
(N.B. By entering the report of the cost center (Actual/Plan/ Variance) T.Code S_ALR_87013611
I found that GR/IR expenses was not charged on the concerned cost centers as shown in the GL )
Your Reply is highly appreciated

Thanks for your kind reply,
But is there a way solve this problem?
And what is the use of leaving a field in the account assignment tab for an internal order while creating a PO and it will not take advantage of the settlement rule????????
And as you know the internal order settlement is a way to create a multiple account assignment
Can we solve the problem by making an automatic fake transaction that reverse the value of the GR/IR and creating another transaction can apply on it the settlement rule??
You know that settlement rule process is one of the best features in the SAP system it save time and effort to make distributions manually

Settlement Rule for Internal Order

Hi All
I have Maintained Settlement rule for Internal order as under
CAT - FXA
Settlement Receiver - Asset
% - 100
Settlement type - Full
Now after settlement of above Order in KO88 . I want again use above internal order. Hence i have trying to put Settlement rule 50% for some anther asset but system gave me following error. Please guide on this issue.
Total = 50.00%, ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ), period 010/2011
Message no. KD042
Diagnosis
You have entered distribution rules which settle 50.00% in total. This applies for settlement view ( Set.Type PER / Version / Actual settlement ) in period 010/2011.
When checking the percentage total, the system found one of the following errors:
The total percentage for the distribution rules is more than 100%
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and this is a rule for full settlement.
The total percentage for the distribution rules is less than 100% and the 100% check is switched on in the settlement profile.

Hi:
        Please refer to the contents of OSS Note 45612 - IM: pre-settlement does not work, or KD042... which states
"Symptom
    1. If a preliminary settlement rule (for example, to cost center) is entered for individual items of capital investment measures with line item management, this rule is not considered during periodic settlement. There is no settlement to cost centers.
    2. If you enter a final settlement rule for individual line items of investment measures with line item management for a partial capitalization (that is, the percentage rate is less than 100%), then you receive the unjustified error message KD042 "Total percent = xx%".
Additional key words
KOB5, CJ70, CJ88, CJ8G, KO88, KO8G, preliminary settlement, partial settlement, partial capitalization
Cause and prerequisites
    1. You did not enter the settlement type ACT in the preliminary settlement rule.
    You can check this in the Line Item Apportionment transaction by choosing the menu option "Goto" -> "Overview dist. rules" to display the distribution rule groups entered so far.
    The system displays rules which have no entry in the "SetTyp" field (settlement type, field name PERBZ).
    2. The check of the percentages is incorrect.
Solution
    1. Install the following correction. Afterwards reverse the incorrect settlement, re-enter the preliminary settlement rule and settle again.
    2. Install the following correction. Afterwards, you can maintain the settlement rule for the partial settlement.
    Note: If you want to use a default settlement rule (maintaining the settlement rule from the master data maintenance transaction), then you are required to distribute the line items at 100%. In order to carry out a partial capitalization (settlement of less than 100%), you have to use menu path "Actual postings -> Period-end closing -> Settlement -> Line item "
Regards

Work Order to cost center settlement with line item detail

Iu2019m having difficulty finding a method to settle from a work order to a cost center with line item detail. When an order is settled with KO88 or KO8G the total value for that work order/cost element combination is combined and posted to the cost center as a lump sum with the description of CTR\######. Users would like to see the individual values that posted to the work order in a cost center report such as KSB1.
I donu2019t see anything in the settlement rule, settlement profile or allocation structure that will allow line item settlement from work order to cost center. Is line item settlement possible when settling to a cost center? Is there an alternate way to see these expenses as line items in KSB1?
Thanks,
Jeff

Thanks Christian,
We've defined an allocation structure that we use for Project System and Work Order settlement and have Receiver Categories established as FXA, CTR and WBS with "by Cost Element" checked. Work order costs do settle to the cost center entered in the settlement rule, the problem is it combines all items values as a single amount when posting to the cost center.
For example:
expenses post to the work order under cost element 500000 for $500, $200, $300 and cost element 600000 for $250 and $250. The settlement rule says to settle to cost center 170000. When the settlement takes place cost center 170000 is debited $1000 to cost element 500000 and $500 to cost element 600000. We would prefer to see individual posting of $500, $200, $300 to 500000 and $250, $250 to 600000.
Thanks,
Jeff

Cost center after settlement in FAGLL03 REPORT

we have process of material issue thru maintennce order. after issuing material FI entry is on respective gl and maintence order
in report fagll03 we can see this combination and then after settlement of cost of order on cost center we are not able to see cost center in report fagll03.
is it possible to get cost center after settlement in this report.
if no then how can we see cost center / gl / material report for maintence orders.

You can't able to see the cost center report until settle the maintenance order to cost center with secondary cost element.
after settlement also you can't see in FAGLL03, you can see only cost center report with secundry cost element

Changing the receiver cat in the settlement rule of Product cost collector

Hi,
I have created a Product cost collector using the Transaction - KKF6N. and observed that the settlement rule got created automatically with the CAT - MAT. I need help for below queries.
1. Is it possible to change the settlement rule for the Product cost collector?
2. If yes, Could you please let me know the procedure to do this?
3. If no, what is the alternate as I want to change the CAT from MAT to ORD.
Your help is very much appreciable and Thanks in advance for the help.

Hi,
Check in order type, Which settlement profile is maintained. Then Goto settlement profile maintain receive type which you want to settle.
Regards,
Sreekanth

Error when Settling AuC to a Cost Center

HI All,
Following err msg is occurring when i tried to settle an AuC to a cost center using the Tcode AIAB.
'Settlement of old asset data to a receiver type CTR is not allowed"
In this asset there are line items belongs to current fiscal year as well as previous fiscal yr. So I hv selected only one line item that belongs to this fiscal yr & tried to settle it. But the same error appear.
Pls help.
Thanks in advance.
Ava

Hi
Pls check the settlement profile. The Cost center might not be set up as a valid receiver.
Regards
Poornima

How can I know the database is using Cost Based or Rule Based?

Hi all expertise,
How can I know the database is using Cost Based or Rule Based?
If cost based it is using, what methods are need to use to minimize the cost when database is running? And which tables I can see the performance of the database?
Thanks
Amy

how to see database setting ?
use this
SQL> sho parameter optimizer
NAME TYPE VALUE
optimizer_dynamic_sampling integer 1
optimizer_features_enable string 9.2.0
optimizer_index_caching integer 0
optimizer_index_cost_adj integer 100
optimizer_max_permutations integer 2000
optimizer_mode string CHOOSE
choose means if table statistics is available then it will use cost
else
use rule based optimizer
for seeing performnace of table use
set autotrace on
and run your query
if it doen't show cost.it means it use rule based
for using cost based
u will calculate table statistics
9i
dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('owner','table');
8i
analyze table <table_name> compute statistics;
hope it will help you
kuljeet pal singh

Settlement Rule based on FL cost center

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for