Settlement rule for subnetwrkof/opr for iw32 only

Hi all,
I have one requirement like this,in iw32 the user have manually entered the settelment rule --> catagery(ntw,nwa) and enter the data in the settlement receiver and what i need to do is I need to fetch the data enter in the settlement receiver and placed that data in the additional data tab Subnetwrk of/Opr before save the order for that is there any function module or any badi for this .Right now I have done the analysis with EXIT_SAPLCOIH_010 , EXIT_SAPLCOIH_009 and
EXIT_SAPLCOIH_012 ,
but fail to update.
can any one guide me how to proceed furthere.
Thanks in advance for your reply.

just what I was looking for, only pity I can't award points.
strange however that I didn't find these tables during debugging in SAPLKOBS in the global data ?
kind regards
arthur

Similar Messages

Error: Maintain settlement rule of the sender for a higher level WBS

Hi,
I dont want to maintain the settlement rule for a higher level WBS. How can i configure this in such a way that i dont get the following error:" Maintain settlement rule of the sender" while doing CJ88. Maintaing a separate Settlement profile for a higher level WBS is an option but we are looking if something else could be done The problem is that there are no actuals booked against, say, level 2 WBS but when i execute CJ88, i get the aforesaid error. How can i ensure that only the lowest level WBS ask for the settlement rule and not the levels above it. I have already removed the Investment profile from the higher level WBS but still getting the same error.
Regards,
DPil

Hi,
It is a type Capex WBS and Biling element is not checked. In fact i get a warning while doing the settlement: WBS is neither a billing element nor an account assignment element.
Diagnosis
WBS element is not indicated as either an account assignment element or as a billing element in the master record.
System Response
The WBS element cannot be assigned to an account.
Procedure
Correct your entries or add the missing indicator to the master record for the WBS element.
But this is just a warning. On pressing enter i get the error :Maintain settlement rule of the sender "

How settlement rule will be created for Sales order with cost object

Dear Experts,
We are using product cost by sales order with valuated stock. In addition we are not using COPA
We also consume some materials at sales order level and at the end of month we want to do the result analysis and settlement for the same amount. In this case can any on explain how system will behave regarding settlement of sales order cost and what entries will get pass in the system.
In our case we have done below activities...
we have created sales order,
All production order activities completed till final GRN including month end activities
Material consumption against sales order
Result analysis executed
At the time of sales order settlement, system throwing error (Sender doesn't have valid receiver, please create settlement rule for sender object)
Then i checked in sales order there sales order settlement rule not defined.
I guess this settlement rule need be generated by system automatically. If not, please let me know the process of it.

HI kishore
the reason is that sale order always carry the revenue and production order and production period carry the cost .
cost you can settle to the Material and even management want to be settle the cost to material only in production order OR period
but in sales order when u sell the product it carry the revenue not the cost and management want see and analysis based on profitability segment are profit center level .
Prerequisites
If CO-PA is active, the system generates a settlement rule when you create the sales order. The settlement rule determines whether data is settled to other objects or other areas in Controlling. In accordance with this settlement rule, the relevant data is settled to CO-PA.
If CO-PA is not active, create a settlement rule. This settlement rule that you create manually normally contains a G/L account as a receiver (such as 399999). You can also settle costs and revenues or results analysis data to objects with revenue.
You can also settle the cost of sales calculated in results analysis to a fixed asset or a cost center. To do this, you must add to the allocation structure the results analysis cost elements under which the cost of sales is updated to the order.
The settlement rule includes a distribution rule for the sales order item. The distribution rule is made up of a settlement receiver, a settlement share, and a settlement type:
The settlement receiver (such as profitability segment or G/L account) specifies the object to which the actual costs and revenue of the sales order item are settled. The settlement receiver can be proposed through the settlement profile.
The settlement share defines the percentage or the equivalence numbers used to distribute the costs to the individual settlement receivers. The settlement share for sales order items is usually 100%. A settlement share of 100% is preset in the system.
The settlement type specifies full settlement of the sales order item. This ensures that all the data on the sales order is available for results analysis.
Settlement still takes place in each period. The revenues and the cost of sales are transferred to CO-PA by period, and the work in process and the reserves are transferred to FI.

Settlement rule not getting defaulted in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order. At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi prasanth,
what i think is becoz in configuration for that order type they might have put the settlement rule as Mandatory for release thats why its coming like that. Do one thing change the settlement rule in configuration as Distribution for release and then check.
pls let me know the result after doing
if it is really helpful to you pls reward me with points
regards
Satish

Exit/BADI for creating settlement rules in IW32 upon release of order

I need settlement rules to be populated in IW32 when an order is released.
The data for the settlement rules population will be obtained from a Z table based on Order type and Maintenance Activity Type.
I am not able to find out a suitable BADI/EXIT to fulfill this requirement. Has anybody worked on this kind of requirement earlier? Please suggest an EXIT/BADI/BTE for this.
Thanks in Advance!!

Hi Harveen,
How did you populate the fields in K_ORDER_SRULE_ADD. Which ones did you populate. I keep getting an error message.
Receiver categ. is not allowed by settlement prof. PM0001 for this sender
Message no. KD031 Diagnosis The settlement profile specifies which receiver
categories you can settle a sender to. Receiver category is not allowed by
settlement profile PM0001 for this sender.
Procedure
You can do the following:
   Assign a settlement profile to the sender, that implements the
required receiver category .
    Choose "Goto -> Settlement Parameters".
   Specify another receiver for distribution rule 009. If you already
used this rule for a previous settlement, enter a valid-to period. Then
enter a new rule for the next settlement with a receiver category. This
category must be one that is allowed by settlement profile PM0001.
Procedure for System Administration
If necessary, maintain a suitable settlement profile.
Would very much appreciate your help.
Cheers
Eunice

Making Settlement rule mandatory for creating any WBS element

Hello All,
We have an requirement that system should not allow us to save any WBS element until the settlement rule is maintained.
This we want only for WBS elements where Investment rule is not assigned.
Can alyone help me to find out if this is possible, if yes then how.
Points Assured.
Thanks & Regards,
Jatinder Bansal

Hi,
The only way it seems possible is using exists in validations.
if not try to check the status of the wbs element in a validation. function module is STATUS_CHECK. and i think the system might set a special status, if a settlement rule has been maintained for a wbs element.
Rgds
Sudhir Reddy

Auto generation of settlement rule for PM orders that are Investment Measur

Hi all
Has anyone successfully automatically generated settlement rules on a PM order that is an Investment measure? The settlement receiver would be an asset. User exit IWO10027 doesn't work. Std settings don't work either because a settlement rule is auto generated for the AUC on the order during settlement (Note 195607) because of IM.
Any ideas?
Thanks
CC

for a PM order as investm,ent measure the system assumes that you wish to create an AuC hence no other settlement rule generation is allowed
you can try by removing the asset class in the IM profile

Settlement rule for AUC not automatically generated

Hi Experts,
I am working on a capital project scenario where I have configured the investment profile and assigned this to the project profile. I have also configured the settlement profile and allocation structure for settlement to FXA.
On release of the WBS element the AUC is automatically created.
I have posted costs to the WBS element.
When I run settlement in test mode, using CJ88 the details show the sender as the WBS element and the reciever as the AUC, and the amount = the cost posted to the WBS element in the posting period, (as expected)
However, (now my problem)
When I run settlement in "update" mode the settlement shows 1 settlement however when I drill down to see the sender or reciever details are blank. There are alno no accouting documents and a settlement rule does not display for the WBS element. There are no error messages even though the settlement has not taken effect.
Please can anyone advise on the possible cause of this error. One further point the document type on the settlement profile is configured as "SA" GL Account Document.
Thanks in advance.
Ian

hi,
Go to Settlement rule (CJ02),where enter the WBS .here go to Extra in the menu bar of that WBS ,under Asset under construction ckeck the box of Historiy....something like that .
Regards
Ricky

Mass deletion of settlement rules for few WBS- Codes

HI All,
I just want to know that is there any possible way to delete settlement rule in mass.
We use to upload the settlement rule data through LSMW program for all the project codes.By mistake the user has excuted twicw the LSMW program and now instead od having one settlement rule now they have two settlement rule assigned to the project code. thats is the second rule is duplicated.
now the user wnats to delete those second settlement rule which got duplicated for all the WBS codes. nearly there will be 6000 records are there which got affected by this.
No entries has been posted to those WBS codes till now.
Kindly any one suugest me how to proceed further to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Joby

Hi,
In customization, use the strategy with "No Receiver" and then use transaction CJB1/ CJB2 to automatically generate the revise settlement rules without receiver.
Regards,
Gaurav

Create settlement rule for Maintenance plan

We have a requirement to create a maintenance plan and assign a settlement rule to the same. I was able to create the maintenance plan using MPLAN_CREATE. I created the settlement rule using the function module K_SRULE_SAVE_UTASK. My problem is when I go to IP03 to check if the settlement rule has been created for the maintenance item, it is not found. When I go to IP02 and click on create and go into the settlement rule maintenance screen, I'm able to see the settlement rule created using the function module.but in the MPOS table, I don't see the indicator IND_ABRVO ( settlement rule indicator ) being maintained.
Can you please help in finding out what I'm missing.
Edited by: Sujay Venkateswaran Krishnakumar on Dec 31, 2009 11:34 AM

Sri Vas,
Is this specific to a particular WBS element or does it happen for ANY WBS element? The WBS element may not have been setup properly.Check the same WBS element directly by going to the WBS element change transaction.Also check the account assignment and status of the WBS element that Ramesh had suggested. If the WBS element has been defined properly,Try changing the settlement rule to a cost center and see if you still get this error.
Regards
Narasimhan

PS - Automatic Settlement Rule Generation

I am currently setting up the automatic settlement rule generation in Project Systems and running some tests to make sure it works properly. I am running into an issue involving the newly generated settlement rule overwriting an existing settlement rule that was entered manually.
To generate the settlement rules, I run transaction code, CJB1 for multiple projects. I am doing it in a batch process, run for a range of projects from 1 - 1000..
Is there a way to distinguish the projects with settlement rules so that a rule isn't generated?
Any thoughts are greatly appreciated.
Thanks!

Hi,
I think you can look for following things-
1. In the selection varaint itself you can mention the project numbers, which you want to have the setllement rules to be generated for. This can be done only if you know the projects which need not to be included in the list of selection.
2. Or else when the settlement rule is already created for the WBS it has the system status as "SETC". You can use this in the selection profile.
Thanks

CJ01 - Old Settlement Rules are Copied

Hi SAP PS Experts,
We have a query When trying to create a project by copying with some other project,
it will copy even the settlement rules which are maintained for final asset.
We know that it can be deleted manually but is there a possibility that it should only copy the Project & WBS
but not settlement rules.
Let me know in case of any further questions.
Regards,
Vikram

Hi Vikram
maybe you will find the CJ20N - copy WBS without settlement rule interesting since it addresses the same problem as you did...
Hope it helps
Panagiotis

Need to Transfer the Reco Key for payments stuck for clarification

Hello Friends,
I have created a lot with a */ wrong contract account in selection field with the payment details in fp25. After saving and posting i am getting a message "Postings made, postprocessing is required". This means that it will not allow me to transfer through FPG4.
In the List item i am getting this message "No assignment of amount 6,000.00- INR possible due to selection specifications".
The problem is that i want this payment to stay in clarification account and pass the bank entry in R/3 by transferring the data.
Please help me in this case.
Regards,
Charvi

Hi,
Firstly, to clear things, the status message "Posting made, postprocessing is required" means that either all items or some items in the payment lot\Check lot has hit the payment clarification worklist (FPCPL) and has not actually hit the account.
There can be many reasons for this status message-
(a) Main\Subs not configured for payments
(b) Clearing settlement rules not configured correctly for incoming payments.
(c) The values from the input file are not getting correctly passed in the payment lot transfer program, RFKKZE00.
Go to t,code FPCPL, give the payment lot no. and execute and then try to post one of the item from the clarification to the account. During posting, you will definately get some error which you can use as a start point for your further analysis.
Finally,when you are posting a query can you open a new thread instead of using an existing answered one.?
Thanks,
Amlan

Maintain settlement rule - parameter

Dear all ,
I Create new maintenance order type in system and creat a manual order through iw31 . but when we want realease the order system open one window name ''Maintain settlement rule - parameter''and asking for settelement profile.
please help me where i can maintain settlement rule in SPRO for system autometic settlement at the time of realease.
Raghav

Hi RS,
Go to -" spro>>>>>PM & CS>>>>>>>>Maintenance and service processing>>>>>>>Maintenance and service orders>>>>>Functions and settings for order types>>>>>>Settlement rule: Define time and creation of distribution rule
Execute
then
put "mandatory for release" and main order will be a settlement receiver" in settlement rule time and Distribution rule sub order field with corresponding to your order type.
After completing this configuration your settlement rule will automatically create for order
Thanks & Regards,
Rahul Pawar

Settlement rule in internal order & trading partner

Hi everybody,
i have a big problem that i can't understand. I'll explain:
I have done a settlement rule TO CO-PA for an internal order.
This settlement seems work well because in CO PA i find all my records, but i have seen that one information is missing.
This information is the TRADING PARTNER.
Someone have told me that the settlement rule doesn't report this information to CO-PA. It's true or not?
If someone can help me i'll give you great point, because for my society is a big problems!!
Thanks a lot.

No, thanks it doesn't help me.
I haven't to settled cost to a fixed asset (FI-AA) but i have to settle cost to a profitability segment (CO-PA).
Best regards

Settlement rule for subnetwrkof/opr for iw32 only

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for