Settlement rule - Internal orders

Hi all
Where do I define an automatic settlement rule for settlement of an internal order to a GL account?  I do not find any strategy sequences that would settle to a GL account....
I know that I can use those strategy sequences for cost centers, WBS elements, etc. 
Is there anything that I need to configure different?
Please help...
Thanks

Hi Raghu
Thanks for your quick reply.  I am talking about the automatic settlement rule.  I know how to create the settlement profile & define it manually when I create orders & make sure it gets settled to the GL account.
But my client wants to default that settlement rule whenever they create orders.  For that I need to define an automatic settlement rule which will default itself to any order that i create with my order type. 
It is under SPRO -> Controlling ->Internal Orders ->Actual Postings->Settlement -> Automatic generation of settlement rules -> Startegy sequences.  So there I dont find any GL account settlement strategy sequence.  So I was asking if anybody have set that up before for an auto settlement rule.
Thanks

Similar Messages

  • PM order settlement to Internal order

    Hi,
    I have a requirement to create work order without any refrence objects.During Teco ,System asks for the settlement rule.
    Can PM Work Order be settled to internal orders?
    Regards
    Anil Kumar
    Edited by: Anil Kumar on May 11, 2010 8:18 AM

    You will not be able to have the same number as the internal order as they are stored in the same table (AUFK)
    PM/CS order are category 30 and internal orders are category 01 (AUFK-AUTYP)
    PeteA

  • Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

    Hi experts,
    We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
    Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
    Thank you,
    Michal

    Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
    That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
    In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
    Regards
    Sharabh

  • Validation durng maintenance of Settlement Rule for Orders

    Is there a way to set up validation during maintenance of settlement rules for orders? Is it via OKC7? How do you do it?

    Dear Noel,
    there are no standard functionality which will make  the entry
    of a settlement rule required in TS KO01 other than having a "required" valid settlement receiver in the settlement profile you have assigned to the order type in TS KOT2_OPA, (you can change the settlement profile in TS OKO7).
    Then you will receive an error message in TS KO01 if you try to save an internal order without a settlement rule. This is the system design.
    However, you also have the possibility to automatically fill the
    settlement rule of an order either via a reference order (or model
    order. TS KOM2),  which you assign to to the order type in question, or you can check the standard enhancement COOM0003, (user exit EXIT_SAPLKOBS_001).
    You can also read the documentation of this user exit in TS SMOD.
    Regards,
    CG

  • Settling investment internal orders to an asset (AA310 msg)

    hi.
    I am wondering if somebody can shed some light for me on the following:
    let's say we have 2 investment internal orders (representing 2 different projects) which are to be settled to one asset.
    for the 1st order the job was done and the status changed to TECO in 2010. Upon full settlement (KO8G, full ) the cost has been settled to an asset (from AuC) and the asset has been capitalized. the capitalization (aquisition) date was set to the end of the period (e.g. Dec 31, 2010).
    the status of the 2nd order has been changed to TECO in 2011. Currently when I'm trying to do a full settlement of the 2nd IO (with KO8G, partial capilazation) I'm getting AA310 (asset value date in diff year) as far as the system is trying to default the asset value date to date when the IO status was chagned to TECO (2011).  I do not want to default the asset value date on the KOG8 screen.
    The question - what is wrong in my approach and what should I do in the case I have a second investment orders to settle to a final asset.
    Sorry if I was not clear, i'm primarly an abaper but trying to understand some business processes related to internal orders and settlement. any information to understand this relationship would be appreciated.
    thank you,
    viktor

    Creation of Internal Order- KO01
    Maintain Settlement receiver as the AUC asset
    Settle the Internal Order- KO88
    Now the values have come to AUC asset
    Distribution of AUC- AIAB
    Enter the Settlement receiver as the Main Asset
    Settlement of AUC- AIBU

  • Settlement of Internal order to Asset under construction (AUC)

    Hi,
    To All
    While settling an internal order to AUC through KO88 it shows already settled whereas the balance of the internal remains the same and while settling AUC the error shows "there is no line item".
    What can be the problem, why internal order is not settling to AUC?
    Has anybody face this issue before? I have spent hell of the time on this issue but haven't resolved this. I would greatly appreciate your response on this.
    Thanks
    Jainendra

    Hi Jainendra,
    Please refer OSS Notes# 310116 (Settlement AuC: Open items not correctly cleared )
    OSS Notes# 412869   (AuC settlement: AW521 or line item not settled )
    Have a look into the below link,
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/4f/71daf9448011d189f00000e81ddfac/frameset.htm
    Also refer the below SDN link:
    Re: Capitalization of Asset
    Hope this helps.
    Please assign points as a way to say thanks
    Message was edited by: Ravi Rana

  • Line Item settlement of Internal Order through Investment Measure

    Dear friends
    Can we do the line item settlement of Internal order. The Internal order is created through IO as Investment Measure.
    Thank You

    Hi,
    Yes. It is possible to have line item settlement for Investment Internal Order.
    Trust this helps much!
    Cheers!

  • Error in Settlement: "Reversal of settlements on Internal Order's"

    Hi All,
    Please help me with the below issue which is as follows:
    "In October I did two settlements in error on internal
    Orders A & B. This refers to assets X &
    Y in co code XX".
    "I need to reverse these settlements in November, I assume
    I use KO88, but am concerned amount the FI posting".
    I want to know what sort of analysis is to be done and precuation to be taken before reversing the settlements.  Please help me this..
    Thanks a ton in advance.
    Regards,
    Vinay

    hi swatha.
      for settlement of internal orders/PM orders KO88/KO8G is run but before execution you shoud see the following step as period end activity:
      1.. calculate activity price (KSII)
      2. Revaluation of actual price KON1/KON2
      kkumar

  • Error while settlement of Internal order

    Dear All
    I am getting the following error while executing KO88 "Choose transaction type and base value appropriate for asset values".
    The settlement and posting period are 12 and the processing type is "Partial Capitalization".
    Pls advice
    Rgds
    Nitika

    hi.....
    check you settlemnt rule for internal order. forsure you will find mismatch between settlemnt rule and actual settlemnt. check in settlement rule the % to be settled.
    Regards
    Manish Jain
    Pls assign points if your problem get solved.

  • Maintain settlement rules for order category 30(Maintenance order).

    Hi Gurus,
    Can we maintain two settlement rules for an order without distribution rule?
    Eample:-  In an order there are three  different costs i.e. material cost,external labour cost and internal labour cost.We want to settle the material cost and external labour cost to Profitability segment and the internal cost to a particular GL account directly.
    Note: No distribution rule is required,because all the cost should settle directly to correspoanding heads i.e. PSG or GL.We don't want to assign  the GL# again and again for different orders in the corresponding order's  settlement rule.
    Require your valuable inputs to proceed.
    Best Regards,
    Ramakanta

    Hi Govardhan,
    If you are working in ECS, the Shopping cart will not create any follow on document in backend R/3.
    I think your Product category is 30, thats why the error says Manual reservation for order category 30 is not allowed.
    Where did you get the maintenance order? Generally maintenance order is created in the backend R/3 (Plant Maintenance) and a P.R will get generated against that order.
    Using PDP (Plan driven procurement) you can transfer that P.R to SRM and can carry out sourcing and can complete the procurement cycle.
    Can you please tell me what is your exact business requirement?
    Hope this will make you more clear.
    Clarifications are welcome.
    Award points for helpful answers.
    Rgds,
    Teja

  • Settlements of internal orders: which table?

    Hi All,
    could anyone tell me in which table, the items of settlement (t.code KO88) for internal orders are stored?
    Thanks

    Hi,
    the settlement result (CO document line items) as already explained in table COEP, the settlement rule / distribution rules in tables COBRA / COBRB.
    best regards, Christian

  • Can't settle an internal order by amount

    My company wants to settle internal orders to a fixed asset by amount instead of equivalence number or %.
    Can anyone describe in detail how to do this please. 
    Thanks and regards
    Walter

    HI,
    as mentioned above, if the "amount settlement" indicator is set in the settlement profile that is assigned to your CO-order you can go to KOB5, select the order/line items you want to settle tick "final settlement" and maintain the settlement rule by entering "amounts" to be settled not only "percentage" or " equivalence numbers".
    best regards, Christian

  • AuC settlement with internal order

    friends,
    while settling AUC with interanal order in settlement rule i have given 100%, but after executing the settlement it is splitting the amount in three gl accounts, i created this internal order with type 0600 and object class - investment.
    regards,

    Hi,
    In the Allocation Structure you might have maintained these cost elements against the receiver.
    Thanks,
    Giridhar

  • Settlement rule for order

    hi co guru sir....kindly guide me to maintain  settlement rule for production order. steps by steps..plz..
    problem is this when i create planned order to production order ..first  screen open for maintain settlement rule...i have maintained..but may be wrong...
    plz guide me for maintain the settlement rule........
    thanx
    regards
    Aqueel

    Hi,
    Settlement rule determines which portion of the costs on a sender should be settled to which receiver(s).
    You need to create a settlement rule to settle the actual costs of a sender object. The settlement rule contains the distribution rules for the sender.
    Structure: The settlement rule contains:
    - One or more distribution rules
    - The settlement parameters for a sender object.
    Creating a Settlement Rule:
    You previously had to maintain the settlement rule for internal orders manually. Now the system can automatically generate settlement rules for internal orders.
    Procedure:
    1) Choose Settlement rule in the master data maintenance for the relevant sender object.
    The Maintain Settlement Rules: Overview screen appears.
    If you stored a default for account assignments in the settlement profile then the system displays the existing distribution rules. The settlement receiver is the object type you stored as an account assignment default in the settlement profile.
    You maintain settlement rules in Customizing under Controlling -> Internal Orders -> Actual Postings -> Settlement -> Maintain Settlement Profiles.
    2) Choose Edit -> New rule or enter the value directly.
    Specify how the sender object costs are to be settled to the various settlement receivers:
    - By percentage
    - By equivalence numbers
    For distribution rules of the same settlement type (periodic or total) you need to determine the portion using either percentage rates or equivalence numbers.
    Specify the settlement type for each distribution rule.
    The system defaults the settlement type depending on the receiver, for example PER for cost center, FUL for fixed asset. You can overwrite the default value, if required. When you save the sender object, you automatically save the settlement rule.
    I hope it will help.
    If helpful, please assign points.
    Regards,
    Manju

  • Settlement Rule-Production Order

    Hi Gurus,
    We are using settlement profile PP01 and some of the production orders it has receiver material and some of the order it has order item(OIT),we activated mateial ledger, is there any impact for those order which is created with settlemetn rule  ORDER ITEM(OIT)
    Your advise please.
    Thanks.
    S.Siva.

    Hi Siva,
    Can you see the SAP notes 1491895 & 1420566.
    The material ledger is active in your system.
    No process number is entered when the planned orders are converted to collective orders in the order headers (for example, by means of Transaction MD04 or CO40), even though the material ledger needs this.
    When goods receipts for the order are posted, the system generates error message CKMLMV009, "Internal error in program SAPLCKMLMVCONNECT in position L001 (RC = &)".
    When the planned orders (for collective orders) are converted, function module CO_SD_PLANNED_ORDER_CONVERT calls function module CK_F_PPC_ORDER_SETTLE to determine the settlement rule of subordinated orders.The process number is calculated but it is not yet updated in the buffer table of the order headers.
    Can you check this for your error message.
    Regards,
    Raj

Maybe you are looking for