Settlement Rule not defaulting in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order.  At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi,
Thanks...... the issue solved.......
The issue was because of the derivation rule in Controlling.
Prase

Similar Messages

  • Settlement rule not getting defaulted in IW32

    Hi Gurus,
    This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order.  At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
    Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
    Prase

    Hi prasanth,
                    what i think is becoz in configuration for that order type they might have put the settlement rule as Mandatory for release thats why its coming like that. Do one thing change the settlement rule in configuration as Distribution for release and then check.
    pls let me know the result after doing
    if it is really helpful to you pls reward me with points
    regards
    Satish

  • Settlement rule not created automatically

    HI All,
    Every time when i create a maintenance order , system did not create settlement rule automatically ,  when i click on settlement rule it ask with default or without default and cancel , when i click on with default the only settlement rule generated , please tell  where is the gap , it should come automatically
    Thanks in advance
    Armaan

    Hi You can not create automatically at creation, Please check the following IMG setting to make it mandatory at some point so that system will generate it automatically.
    Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>Maintenance and Service Processing>Maintenance and Service Orders> Functions and Settings for Order Types> Settlement Rule: Define Time and Creation of Distribution Rule
    Other wise try User Exit IWO10027
    Thanks,
    SS

  • Settlement rules not getting created

    Hi,
    During period end, all 2nd level WBS elements are generally settked to AuCs. I had maintained the settlement strategy in such a way that all the WBS elements below 2nd level are settled to its Superior. When i tested this in one of the Client, it worked fine whereas in the new client, when I execute CJB2, system gives the message "processed with no errors", however when I check the WBS element, settlement rules are not created. What could be the problem ?
    thanks in advance.

    Hi
    A copy of text ( donot know anymore, where I got it):
    Only the wbs element with investition profile, which has the 'manage        
    Auc' (technical field INVMA ), will be excluded. In this situation          
    the automatisch generation of settlement rules is not useful.                                                                               
    In other case, that the wbs element has a investition profile, but          
    the investition profile do not has the flag 'manage Auc' ticked, is not     
    considered as a accompanying measure. In this situation, a autom.           
    settlment rule generation can be useful, that why the program do not        
    exclude such wbs elementen.                                                                               
    Please notice, in this issue, only the customizing setting of investiti-    
    on profile is involved, not the settlement rules.                                                                               
    you can take a small modification, which remove the check of the            
    'invma' of inves. profile, which is programed purposefully.                                                                               
    include LKSRGF01    form process_block                                      
          general checks                                                      
            if not lt_prps-imprf is initial.                                    
              call function 'IM_TAPRF_READ'                                     
                   exporting                                                    
                        i_ivpro = lt_prps-imprf                                 
                   importing                                                    
                        e_taprf = ls_taprf.                                     
              if not ls_taprf-invma is initial. "invest object      " delete    
                add 1 to stats-sal_0.      "couldn't be handled                 
                perform wla_confirm_proc_status                                 
                          using p_rsthie_block-name(22)                         
                                kpepw_objstat-not_relevant                      
                                space                                           
                                check_messages-off.     
    Kind regards,
    Zhenbo
    Edited by: Zhenbo Wang on Jul 13, 2009 5:27 PM

  • CO: Automatic creation of Settlement rule - settlement rule not saved

    Hello,
    First, We have a customer field in our internal order called 'ZWBS'.
    also, I have  customized automatic Creation of settlement rule for internal order by:
    1. T-code KSR4 - I have created Strategy called 'C25'.
    2. I created Strategy Sequences for Automatic Generation of Settlement Rule called 'ZC25'
    with T-code KSR2_ORC.
    3.I Assigned the Strategy Sequence To Order Type ZC25.
    4. I used User Exit COOM0003 in order to create Settlement rule from ZWBS field.
    In KO01, when i go into the settlement rule I can see the 2 lines that the user exit created.
    The problem is that when i'm saving the internal order the settlement rules are not saved.
    My questions are:
    1. Is anyone met this problem?
    2. is the user exit work on T-code KO02 also?
    thanks for your help.
    Best regards,
    Lior

    Hi Lior,
    Hope below information can give you some hints:
    See the detailed description of the error for example for order, in transaction KO02, click button 'Master data', click button 'Settlement Rule', populate column category with 'PSG' and press
    <enter>. On the 'Assignment to a Profitabilty Segment' screen press button 'Derivation' and see the long text of message K/111. In case the generation of settlement rules fails again later use these steps to find out why and check the derivation rule by means of transaction KECM.
    Best Regards,
    Owen

  • Correct Settlement Rule not extracted from R3

    Hi Everyone,
    I hope someone can help with my issue:
    There are 2 settlement rules for a specific WBS in R3. Datasource: 0WBS_ELEMT_ATTR
    Settlement Rule 1: valid from Period 0 to Period 1 Year 2007,
    Settlement Rule 2: valid from Period 2 Year 2007 until Period 16 Year 9999
    Master data in BI for the specific WBS is only picking up Settlement Rule 1.
    I ran rsa3, to check data in R3, and it is also showing Settlement Rule 1.
    Please could anyone give me some advise on how to go about this issue?
    Thanks for your help.

    Hi
    While filling the Setup tables also have you restricted with the Settlement Rules.. if so you need to set only for once you cannot have 2 settlement rules separately for the same DS and recheck your settlement Periods again ..
    RSA3 shows only the filled data, if it is not showing the 2nd one then you have not filled the data for the same.
    Hope it helps

  • Default settlement rule with settlement type as FUL for service orders

    Hi Folks,
    Could you please advise me on the below issue?
    Requirement: setting up of default settlement rule with default settlement receiver as u201CCOST CENTREu201D and settlement type as u201CFULu201D for the maintenance orders (Order category u2013 30).
    I was trying to configure the same in transaction KSR3_ORI to assign the strategy to the service order type by clicking u201CNew Entriesu201D system not showing the drop list for the status column which is a mandatory field.
    We have applied the below notes:
    Note 313454 - Info: Default value for settlement type
    Note 851975 - Settlement use automatic generation creates
    Could you please guide us to get the default settlement rule for service orders along with settlement type as u201CFULu201D

    I was also with this problem in 2013 january and only found some information about this, here.
    Our solution was change the Maximum number of distribution rules in Maintain Settlement Profiles to 1, because we wanted the FUL rule and it is always in the first line.
    Now, for curiosity, I was search for another solution and found the SAP note 2028108 that explain that is not possible to change the strategy for PM/CS orders.
    This note was released at 09.06.2014

  • Defaulting G/L account in work order settlement rule

    Hello,
    I have set my work order settlement profile, the default object to be G/L.  However, in the equipment master record, at the Organization tab (account assignment group), i don't see any field for G/L account.
    When i create settlement rule with default, i get error that rule cannot be created with default.
    Where can i enter the G/L account in the equipment master to enable the auto settlement rule creation?

    you can always explain the concept of FI account through Cost Center and CO account through Cost Element from Plant Maintenance and FI/CO organisation point of view and in relation to business process.
    As you cant define in master data you cant get it automatically copied into settlement rule and hence have to maintain it manually as system dont know which GL to use as settlement receiver as not maintained in master data.

  • Doubt about the settlement rule of the Production ORder

    The only default distribution rule allowed for a PP order is PP1 or PP2.  We would need to change that to allow settlement to multiple receivers as a default. If that is the case, we may want to look into a user exit to update the settlement rule during production order creation instead so that the G/L account is correct from the beginning.
    Currently when we create the production order, the settlement rule will default the below, I am not sure if a user exit is able to maintain the Source as 200 (Materials)?
    If yes, we can then add the second rule for Source 100 (Labor and Mfg) via the user exit as well.
    In this case, SAP will not prompt us error of settlement with 200%, as they are from difference Sources.
    now anybody can explain me about the User EXit we have to correct this

    any help on this.. please its very urgent
    thanks in advance

  • Refurbishment subcon order settlement rule

    Hello,
    I am currently test the refurbishment subcon (using the ADSUBCON Tcode).  With this method, I cannot use a refurbishment type order (e.g. PM04).  I need to use a normal order type.
    Issue I got here is the settlement rule.  With the PM04 order, the settlement rule is defaulted to MAT (material).  However, with my normal order type, i cannot set the settlement to MAT.
    I did the SPRO to enable MAT as optional settlement receiver but at the order when i try to create the MAT settlement rule, i get error that MAT can only be created automatically.
    Anyone know how to automatic create settlement rule with receiver MAT?

    Hi Paul,
    Thanks for your input.
    If MAT cannot be assign manually, can IWO10027 help in this case?  I have never use IWO10027 before.
    I am just curious.  In the SAP training manual, the recommended way to handle the refurbishment by external is via subcontracting and it specifically mention do not use refurbishment order but a "normal" order type.  How can we assign MAT as receive in this case?
    One way i can think of (which sounds rather silly....) is to settle everything to a refurbishment order and somehow let the refurbishment order do the proper settlement.

  • Creation of Distribution rule(Settlement rule) in production order

    Hello SAP GURUS,
        I have one good query for you guys.When we create production order,by default it takes settlement rule (settle the cost of production order to material even that 100% settlement),and its because we have given the distribution rule (Default rule) in Order type dependent parameters.But in one of my friend system when i was creating production order manually it was not taking settlement rule by default and when i was going to save the order it was saying that settlement rule is not defined.I checked in order type that settlement profile was defined their.Even i checked in order type dependent parameter, distribution rule(default rule)  was their as material 100% settlement,defined over their.
      could you guys help in understanding this problem that where we have to define that system should create settlement rule by default(Settlement to material and even that 100% settlement).

    Hi..
    please try this....Goto KSR2_VBP.
    THere are two strategies.. 01 and 02.
    01 for manual creation of settlement rules
    02 for auto creation..
    first check whether 01 and 02 are in your plant.
    Sales and distrib....basic functions......auto gen. of settlement rules.......
    here you ll find two activities.
    (1)maintaining the settlement strategies and
    (2)activating one among them.
    If you activate 02, your problem will be solved..
    Also check this..
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/a9/ab777d414111d182b10000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
    The settlement profile is to be defined for thee particular Order Type to generate automatically.
    Define Production Order Type in OPJH
    Under Cost controlling check the settlement profile .
    If not create the same in OPJH.
    Settlement Profile: Create settlement profile - SPRO > Controlling > Product Cost Controlling > Product cost by Order > Period End Closing > Settlement > Create Settlement Profile
    Enter Settlement profile from OPJH or Choose one for production order
    and configure Settlement profile. Indicators
    with wishes
    karthick.

  • How can I make settlement rule mandatory in create work order (IW31)

    How can I make settlement rule mandatory in create workorder and saving without release.
    I kanow we can make settlement rule mandatory upon Release order but here requirement is
    Create work order (IW21) save without releasing that time settlement rule should default.

    Hi,
    1.If you want the settlement rule default then maintain account assignment data in technical object and when MO is created on that it would be copied into the settlement rule...
    2. If you want to make those fields mandatory .... plz check up field selections in config , if you cannot find those then use SHD0 Transaction variant to make those fields mandatory.
    3. Enter SHD0 , Enter IW31 in transaction and ZIW31 for transaction variant ..click create option and this takes you to IW31 initial screen , here enter required values of technical object etc and press enter and this gives you IW31 Initial scree screen variant , click continue and this takes you to inside screen and here enter required field values and on pressing enter gives you screen variant .. so you need to enter field values and check the flow of screen variants and on getting settlement rule screen variant select required option for the fields you need.
    4. Finally you can save that in package created in SE80 for transporting to other client .., you can activate the variant in SHD0 -->Standard variants -->you can find activate option ..
    regrds
    pushpa

  • How settlement rule will be created for Sales order with cost object

    Dear Experts,
    We are using product cost by sales order with valuated stock. In addition we are not using COPA
    We also consume some materials at sales order level and at the end of month we want to do the result analysis and settlement for the same amount. In this case can any on explain how system will behave regarding settlement of sales order cost and what entries will get pass in the system.
    In our case we have done below activities...
    we have created sales order,
    All production order activities completed till final GRN including month end activities
    Material consumption against sales order
    Result analysis executed
    At the time of sales order settlement, system throwing error (Sender doesn't have valid receiver, please create settlement rule for sender object)
    Then i checked in sales order there sales order settlement rule not defined.
    I guess this settlement rule need be generated by system automatically. If not, please let me know the process of it.

    HI kishore
          the reason is that sale order always carry the revenue  and production order and production period carry the cost .
       cost you can settle to the Material and even management want  to be settle the cost to material only in production order OR period
    but in sales order  when u sell the product it carry the revenue not the cost and management want see and analysis based on profitability segment are profit center level .
    Prerequisites
    If CO-PA is active, the system generates a settlement rule when you create the sales order. The settlement rule determines whether data is settled to other objects or other areas in Controlling. In accordance with this settlement rule, the relevant data is settled to CO-PA.
    If CO-PA is not active, create a settlement rule. This settlement rule that you create manually normally contains a G/L account as a receiver (such as 399999). You can also settle costs and revenues or results analysis data to objects with revenue.
    You can also settle the cost of sales calculated in results analysis to a fixed asset or a cost center. To do this, you must add to the allocation structure the results analysis cost elements under which the cost of sales is updated to the order.
    The settlement rule includes a distribution rule for the sales order item. The distribution rule is made up of a settlement receiver, a settlement share, and a settlement type:
    The settlement receiver (such as profitability segment or G/L account) specifies the object to which the actual costs and revenue of the sales order item are settled. The settlement receiver can be proposed through the settlement profile.
    The settlement share defines the percentage or the equivalence numbers used to distribute the costs to the individual settlement receivers. The settlement share for sales order items is usually 100%. A settlement share of 100% is preset in the system.
    The settlement type specifies full settlement of the sales order item. This ensures that all the data on the sales order is available for results analysis.
    Settlement still takes place in each period. The revenues and the cost of sales are transferred to CO-PA by period, and the work in process and the reserves are transferred to FI.

  • CO: IO automatic Creation of settlement rule

    Hello everyone,
    We created a customer field in internal order (ZWBS field).
    Now, I customized all transactions:
    1. By T-code KSR4 I created Strategy 'C25'.
    2. I created Strategy Seq. called 'ZC25' by T-Code 'KSR2_ORC'.
    3. I' have Assigned the strategy Seq. to the order type by T-code 'KSR2_ORC'.
    When I create and internal order and go into Settlement rule I can see the two lines (FUL & PER) exactly like I've customized, but when I'm saving the order, the settlement rules are not save with the order.
    Is anyone met with a problem like that?
    I'll be gratefull for your help.
    Thanks,
    Lior

    Hi Lior,
    Is this the same with CO: Automatic creation of Settlement rule - settlement rule not saved?
    Best Regards,
    Owen

  • Validation for the settlement rule of a wbs element

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement that in which i have to validate the settlement rule of the wbs done through t-code cj01/cj02/cj07,cj20n.
    If the settlement receiver object is an G/L account (settlement category g/l )  then i have to check that if it is an o&m project type
    wbs element  settling on some already mentioned G/L e.g 0001081340,0001081341, then  it should through some error  like settlement rule not valid etc.
    I have tried cjb1/cjb2 through badi WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE by creating some strategy but it did not have any option for G/L
    settlement reciever. Also client will not agree to this as they want to create settlement rule manually.
    I have also tried the exit 'EXIT_SAPLCOI1_027 ' but its not getting triggerred during settlement rules assign mentand also i think it will not solve my purpose.
    Please help me as i am struck in this for long time now.
    Warm Regards,
    Hariom

    Hi Prabhu ,
    thanks for the quick update.
    I have tried many badi's and exits but they are not triggering at the saving time of the wbs.
    badi :
    PROJECTDEF_UPDATE
    WBS_FIELDS_FOR_ASSET
    WBS_USER_FIELDS_F4
    WORKBREAKDOWN_UPDATE
    WBS_SETTLEMENT_RULE
    exits :
    EXIT_SAPLCJWB_004
    EXIT_SAPLCJWB_005
    EXIT_SAPLCJWB_001
    These above exits i have tried either they are not implemented or they are not triggered during saving of a wbs element.
    please suggest any exit or badi's which you may have used.
    Thanks and regards,
    Hariom

Maybe you are looking for