Settlement rule not getting defaulted in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order. At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi prasanth,
what i think is becoz in configuration for that order type they might have put the settlement rule as Mandatory for release thats why its coming like that. Do one thing change the settlement rule in configuration as Distribution for release and then check.
pls let me know the result after doing
if it is really helpful to you pls reward me with points
regards
Satish

Similar Messages

Settlement rules not getting created

Hi,
During period end, all 2nd level WBS elements are generally settked to AuCs. I had maintained the settlement strategy in such a way that all the WBS elements below 2nd level are settled to its Superior. When i tested this in one of the Client, it worked fine whereas in the new client, when I execute CJB2, system gives the message "processed with no errors", however when I check the WBS element, settlement rules are not created. What could be the problem ?
thanks in advance.

Hi
A copy of text ( donot know anymore, where I got it):
Only the wbs element with investition profile, which has the 'manage
Auc' (technical field INVMA ), will be excluded. In this situation
the automatisch generation of settlement rules is not useful.
In other case, that the wbs element has a investition profile, but
the investition profile do not has the flag 'manage Auc' ticked, is not
considered as a accompanying measure. In this situation, a autom.
settlment rule generation can be useful, that why the program do not
exclude such wbs elementen.
Please notice, in this issue, only the customizing setting of investiti-
on profile is involved, not the settlement rules.
you can take a small modification, which remove the check of the
'invma' of inves. profile, which is programed purposefully.
include LKSRGF01    form process_block
      general checks
        if not lt_prps-imprf is initial.
          call function 'IM_TAPRF_READ'
               exporting
                    i_ivpro = lt_prps-imprf
               importing
                    e_taprf = ls_taprf.
          if not ls_taprf-invma is initial. "invest object      " delete
            add 1 to stats-sal_0.      "couldn't be handled
            perform wla_confirm_proc_status
                      using p_rsthie_block-name(22)
                            kpepw_objstat-not_relevant
                            space
                            check_messages-off.
Kind regards,
Zhenbo
Edited by: Zhenbo Wang on Jul 13, 2009 5:27 PM

Settlement Rule not defaulting in IW32

Hi Gurus,
This is a specific issue related to the 'settlement rule' defaulting in the refurbishment order. At the time of creating order and trying to release the order, the settlement rule is getting defaulted in the order, but once I save the order without releasing and again from the change mode of the order (IW32), try to release the order it is saying that the settlement rule not maintained.
Could anybody please let me know why the system behaves like this? Do I need to change anything?
Prase

Hi,
Thanks...... the issue solved.......
The issue was because of the derivation rule in Controlling.
Prase

Excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order

Hi all,
While capturing excise invoice , the excise rate and value is not getting defaulted from the purchase order and in Excise Item Tab BED,AED,ECS is Zero at both header as well as item level for only one material in STO process and if we are doing same process taking other material all things are coming perfectly and We are maintaining condition with respect to vendor,plant and material combination.Any input related to this will be helpfull and rewarded.
Regards
Vishal

Hi,
Follow STO Process for this;
1.Create a vendor for the company code of receiving plant, using account group: 0007 using T-Code XK01.
2. Assign this vendor to Delivering plant
Go to XK02 >Purchasing view>Extras>Add. Purchasing data>Plant
3. Create internal customer with the sales area of the vendor. Go To XD01
4. In pricing procedure determination relevant to STO, assign document Pricing Procedure and customer pricing procedure appropriate for STO to get the pricing in the invoice.
5. Maintain condition records for the relevant pricing condition.
6. Some more setting for STO: Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Receiving plant >assign customer here & Supplying SA (for billing) to Receiving plant here
7. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > define shipping data for plants > Go to Supplying plant and assign the sales area of receiving plant.
8. Go to MM > Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > assign delivery Type & Checking rule
Assign the delivery type to document type. In this case, Delivery type NLCC is assigned to Document type NB
9. Go to MM> Purchasing > Purchase Order > Set up STO > Assign document Type, One step Procedure, Under delivery tolerance
Assign the document type NB to supplying plant and receiving plant
10. After all settings, Create the STO using T-Code: ME21N and maintain pricing conditions of freight and Save.
11. In supplying plant Maintain condition record in sales using VK11 the same will flow in receiving plant when referring the OBD no during MIGO.
10. Create Delivery: VL10G
12. Picking, PGI: VL02N
13. Billing: VF01
Save the document and its done
14. J1IIN - Outgoing Excise Invoice
15. MIGO - Goods Receipt against outbound Delivery
16. J1IEX - Capture & Post Excise Invoice
Rgs

HRA not getting defaulted in IT - 0008

Hi SAP users,
This will be the most basic configuration but don't know how I am facing a problem in defaulting HRA wage type in IT - 0008 (Basic Pay)
I have created a wage type 9001 which was copied from M230,
In T511 the wage type has INVAL B,   Amount = + & Number/unit = -
In T7INA9
WT        Amt               RAP indc
9001     Blank          A Allowance      INR      01.01.1990      31.12.9999
In T7INT9
WT          Tax Type                         Frequency      Exmpt It     Tax Code
9001      R Tax exemption is Rule      Blank               00.00     SHRA
Also, I have maintained T510 in which 9001 amt is kept as Blank
T539A the below values are maintained;
TM 1 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9000 Basic Salary
TM 2 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9001 HRA
TM 3 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9003 Conveyance Allowance
TM 4 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9006 Personal Pay
TM 5 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 O 9008 Education Allow.
T539J the below values are maintained;
PRZNT 9001 HRA 1 01.01.1990 31.12.9999 9000 Basic Salary     50.00
LGMST
T = Test Basic
PERSK Employee Subgroup
        TM = EXECUTIVE – SM3
                      20/TM
TARIF
T = Test Basic
    PERSK Employee Subgroup
        TM = EXECUTIVE – SM3
                 TM/GM
T7INA1 - TM01 (EXECUTIVE – SM3)
T7INA3 - GM TM 3 TM TM01
T7INA5 - TM01 --> 20/TM
All the configuration is correctly done in the system still it is not defaulting in IT - 0008. Also, I saw a post in whcih it was mentioned that remove HRA from Table T7INT9 then it will be defaulted which i did & it worked. However, as per my understanding it is worng to remove the wt from there as it is used for Tax exemption nd linked with tax code.
Please let me know wht measures should I take to resolve this issue.
Regards,
Prasad lad

Hi Prasad,
The configuration done from your side are correct . As per SAP standard, the HRA will not get defaulted unless IT581 is maintained. So we need to change the procedure to default the HRA WT
1. In Hiring Action, Insert IT581 after the infotype IT0008 so that once you save the infotype 581 , HRA will get defaulted in Infotype 0008
2. In IT581, If you dont know whether the Employee is staying in Rented house or Own house,Then inform your user to select always 'Own Accomodation' and then save it.
3. In ESS, the employee can change the option in IT581 (IT declaration) later.
Only way to get default other than i have mentioned above is removing the Wagetype from Table T7INT9, But the Exemption will not get calculated for the same.
If you have any clarifications, then raise the Oss Message. SAP will definitely say the same thing.
I hope this would resolve this issue.
Thanks
Rajini

Org unit is not getting defaulted for the selected position in infotype0001

Org unit is not getting defaulted for the selected position in infotype 0001 during the hiring action.
In OM Org. units and positions have been created.
The Org. unit to Position relationship is also created.
But inspite of this, In infotype 0001, the after selecting a position, the Org unit is still getting defaulted to "00000000" instead of the Org. unit Id to which the position belongs. (Please note: At the time of selecting the position, I do structure search and the position is shown under the correct Or. unit)
Have I missed any step?

Have u run the RHINTE programmes properly ?
are u able to save the record?
As some times it may be display probolem, if u r able to save the record then check the relationship in pp10/po13.
and U have not answered what Mr. Valeri is asking about your Implementation/support because these type we come accress if data is not uploaded properly.
Regards
vinmax

Entries in T510 are not getting defaulted in IT0008

Hi Experts,
Entries maintined in T510 are not getting defaulted in IT0008.
According to the wagetype model (LGMST - Feature ) the wage types are defaulting accurately but the amount is coming blank.
Please advice.
Regards,
IFF

V_T511 - Wage Type Characteristics maintian the indirect valuation model. Select the module variant as per ur req.
V_T539A - Default Wage Types for Basic Pay
LGMST - Feature
V_T539J - Base Wage Type Valuation
V_T7INA1 - Pay scale grouping for allowances
V_T7INA3 - Associating pay parameters to pay scale grouping
V_T7INB1 - Basic Wages
V_T7INA5 - Wage type model for pay scale grouping for allowances
V_T7INA9 - Reimbursement allowances perks - eligibility and calculation

Employee percentage not getting defaulted in additional actions

Hi all,
My employement percentage & position is not getting defaulted in 0001 - while running additional actions. I need to manually key in the percentage and in case of any promotion i need to manually key in the changed position number. Can somebody help.
Regards,
LN Bhattacharya
Edited by: Lakshminarasimhan Bhattacharya on Mar 15, 2011 5:02 PM

Hi,
your problem is because U didnt maintain intigration b/w om &pa
thats why ur getting that prob.... To make integration between PA and OM (also read as integration between PA and PD)
IMG> PA> OM--> Basic settings > integration>set up integration with PA or u can go by using table T77S0
set the integration switch PLOGI ORGA to X
Check the switch PLOGI PLOGI is marked as 01- for active plan version integration
Table T77S0 is the major table for OM - PA integration
u can do that through running the reports like;
Reports in relation to PA - OM
Report RHINTE00 is used to transfer data from PA to OM
RHINTE10 is to transfer OM data to PA tables
RHINTE30 is to update IT0001 (org assignment) for the person you have selected
RHINTE20 is to determine whether the data relevant for integration is available in PA and OM
if u maintained percentages and positions in om.... after doing integration those will default in pa
hope this helpful to u ,
all the best,
regards
hima bindu
Edited by: Hima Bindu4 on Mar 15, 2011 10:02 PM

I am not getting default currency in "Anual salary" fiield - IT0008

Hi,
I am not getting default currency in Anual salary fileld while creating data in IT0008.
Please help me where I need to maintain this values, this is for few countries only.
Thanks in advance.
RS.

Hi,
Maintian the table V_T510F_B for your pay scalre type and payscale area with respective to your country grouping.
Regs,
Brahma

In Italy, for IT 0002 State is not getting defaulted.

Hi,
While maintaining Personal data IT 0002 for Italy, when I select the birth place, the municipality key is getting defaulted but the state field is not getting defaulted. As a result, I can select any state and when I press the save button system is accepting it; which should not happen. Please help me how I can solve this issue.
Regards,
Sai

Hi Sai,
check T5ITM4 table once may be it helps you
Regards,
Kitchlu

Purchase Req & Standard PO - Price is not getting Defaulted from Price List

Dear All,
Hope you are doing good!!!
We are implementing R12.1 for one of our client. This query is pertaining to the Advance Pricing with Purchasing. Infact client wants to default the Purchase Requisition and Standard Purchase Order Price from Price List.
I have done entire setup and defined ASL for this reason. But still price is not getting defulted from Contract Purchase Ageerement.
What could be the reason. Its an standard fucntionality but still its not picking up.
I would really appreciate if someone could help me on this. Its URGENT.
Thanks in Advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Aditya

Let us go through the steps involved in integrating Advanced Pricing with Purchasing so that we know if we have missed anything.
1. Create Price Lists in Advanced Pricing.
2. Setup Profile Options in System Administrator responsibility:
QP: Licensed for Product - at Application: Purchasing level = Purchasing.
QP: Pricing Transaction Entity - at Application: Purchasing level = Procurement
( Site level - ‘Order Fulfillment’ )
Profile option can be set at site, application, and user levels.
QP: Source System Code – at Application: Purchasing level = Oracle Purchasing
( Site level -- ‘Oracle Pricing’ )
Profile can be set at site and responsibility levels.
QP: Item Validation Organization - at Application: Purchasing level = null
( Site level -- specified in Financial Options )
Profile option can be set at site and responsibility levels.
3. Add item to the Price list Advanced Pricing ->Price Lists -> Price List Setup.
Enter the item/price/dates etc.
4. Create Contract Purchase Agreement.
5. Create Approved Suppliers List. In the Source Documents, select the Type as Contract and reference the Contract Agreement Number.
Create the Sourcing Rule and add the Rule to the Assignment Set.
6. Create the Standard Purchase Order referencing the Contract Purchase Agreement in the Reference Documents.
The Price listed should be defaulted from the Price Lists.
Cross-Check the following steps and let me know if it still fails and we can try to resolve from then on :)

Settlement rule not created automatically

HI All,
Every time when i create a maintenance order , system did not create settlement rule automatically , when i click on settlement rule it ask with default or without default and cancel , when i click on with default the only settlement rule generated , please tell where is the gap , it should come automatically
Thanks in advance
Armaan

Hi You can not create automatically at creation, Please check the following IMG setting to make it mandatory at some point so that system will generate it automatically.
Plant Maintenance and Customer Service>Maintenance and Service Processing>Maintenance and Service Orders> Functions and Settings for Order Types> Settlement Rule: Define Time and Creation of Distribution Rule
Other wise try User Exit IWO10027
Thanks,
SS

New Value addition in Restricted List under Rules not getting reflected

Hi,
I have created a custom rule for a custom profile. In the rule i have configured a metadata named as Reviewer. Under restricted values of reviewer i have put in 2 values.
It is getting reflected properly in the profile check in form.
But now when i add a new value, it is not getting reflected. Is restart required to get that field populated with new value ?. I have already published the schema base and static files.
Please suggest.
Regards,
Boopathy P

In your metadata field definition, your field is defined as having an option list. Does the value you just added to the restricted list also exist in the overall list of values for the field?
For example, your list has values "a", "b", and "c". In your profile restricted list, you have "a" and "b". Now have you added "d" to the restricted list, which does not appear in the defined list for the metadata field?

In PO , while giving one plant GRWR is not getting defaulted

Hi,
While creating a purchase order, in Conditions tab the GRWR is getting defaulted if I am giving one plant but it i snot getting defaulted if I am giving some other plant.
Why? What could be the reason.
Rgds
Arpit

Hello
GRWR is your condition type, right?
Are u using the same purchase organization and the same vendor or vendors assigned to same vendor schema group?
Confirm that first.
If not in the procedure where the condition type is not coming default, check whether the manual tick is given in pricing procedure in M/08.
Regards

Message output condition typ for PO not getting defaulted during PO create

Hi,
I have created a ZNEU output type for purchase order print out for ZNB purchase document type by copying the stndard NEU output type ,
I have mainatined the condition record in NACE for ZNEU out put type against the Purchase docuemnt type ZNB, but when i create a PO and save i am not getting the ZNEU message output type as default in PO,
Kindy provide your valuable input.
My requirement is to default z output type in PO

Hi
SPRO-MM-Purchasing-messages-ouput control-message type-define message type for PO-Fine tuned control PO
Here you can define which message type needs to be defaulted
Regards
Sandeep

Settlement rule not getting defaulted in IW32

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for