Settlement rule set to Periodic, remaining balance cannot be settled

Hi!
We are trying to settle the remaining balance of a network to another network. Previous balances were already settled before. However, upon checking the network that is to be settled, the settlement rule that was set was periodic and the date that it was last used was last March. Now that we are trying to settle the balances due to the postings for the period of April in CJ88, the message that there is no more to settle appears. Is it because of the previous settlement rules that was maintained? I was thinking of adding another rule wherein the settlement is set to FUL already. Kindly help me please. =)
Regards,
Happy

Hi HappyRod,
I am facing the similar issue in which i have some cost to settle and settlement rule that i am using is periodic. But when i try to settle the cost using ko88, it gives a message that "There is nothing to settle ".
Could you please guide me as to what you did and how did your issue get resolves. i guess i might be encountering the same issue.
regards,
Priyank
Please open a thread for your specific query. Don't activate old threads.
-Paul (moderator)
Edited by: Paul Meehan on Jan 30, 2012 11:09 AM

Similar Messages

Document balance cannot be distributed when settlement is reversed via CJ88

Dear Experts,
When i do settlement reverse via CJ88, i got the below mentioned error.
"Document balance cannot be distributed when settlement is reversed"
My current system has implemented already the below notes
"Note 891709 - Settlement reversal to fixed asset: Error msgs AW751, AW753" but the satus of implementation is " Cannot be implemented" which the SAP Note does not contain any correction instructions that you can implement in your system. No action is required.
other SAP note related to this error is Note 190402 - Settlement to an asset: AW751, AW753 with reversal which is for the SAP system up to 4.6C version.
My current system is ECC 6.0.
Can any one give me a hint what could be the cause for this error other than above mentioned?
Regards
vetrivelan

Hi Vetrivelan,
The solution lies in note 891709 itself. May be you have missed the correction part given in the note. This note has two correction options for separate versions. Check it once again.
Also check the prerequisite as stated in the note. It can guide you about the relevence of this note to your system.
Regards

Cannot attach User property set within a Rule set

Hi,
I cannot attach a user property set within a rule set. When i create a new
rule set in the tools it doesnt give me a field to attach a User property
set to a rule set. I dont get this.
I am using WLCS 3.2, cloudscape, WL 5.1 SP 6, Win2000.
Any help wud be greatly appreciated.

Hello Kapil,
This is a good thing. Allow me to convince you. Prior to WLCS 2.0.1 sp1,
each rule set required that a property set be associated with it. Rules in
that rule set could only use properties from that property set. You could not
write a rule that used properties from multiple property sets. Therefore, it
was impossible to combine user/group, session, and request properties in
rules. It is a good thing that you don't have to associate a property set
with the rule set anymore.
kapil wrote:
Hi,
I cannot attach a user property set within a rule set. When i create a new
rule set in the tools it doesnt give me a field to attach a User property
set to a rule set. I dont get this.
I am using WLCS 3.2, cloudscape, WL 5.1 SP 6, Win2000.
Any help wud be greatly appreciated.--
Ture Hoefner
BEA Systems, Inc.
2590 Pearl St.
Suite 110
Boulder, CO 80302
www.bea.com

A simple problem? - cannot grant create rule set

Hi,
Can anyone spot the stupid mistake i'm obviously making when trying to grant create rule set to my streams admin user? The script was working last week?!
BEGIN
DBMS_RULE_ADM.GRANT_SYSTEM_PRIVILEGE(
privilege => DBMS_RULE_ADM.CREATE_RULE_SET_OBJ,
grantee => 'strmadmin',
grant_option => FALSE);
END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00931: missing identifier
ORA-24000: invalid value , USER/ROLE should be of the form [SCHEMA.]NAME
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_RULE_ADM", line 167
ORA-06512: at line 2
Many thanks,
Warren

Yes, catpatch.sql is necessary only for existing 9.2.0.1 databases upgraded to 9.2.0.2.
I am assuming that when you created the database under 9.2.0.2 that catalog.sql and
catproc.sql were run. The next step, I guess, is to turn on sql tracing to see
which sql statement actually fails when you run the command. Turn on sql tracing
with the following command, and then execute the procedure again.
alter session set sql_trace=true;

Mail not following rules set by outlook

Hello everyone,
I cannot figure this one out. I have rules set up in outlook to sort mail into folders, but ios mail will not follow them. The folder shows up in ios mail, but all the emails still go to inbox while the folder remains empty. I am running ios7.1
Also, is there a way to turn off notifications for this folder only? I would not like to be alerted when mail arrives in this folder, but still alerted for mail arriving at my inbox.
Thanks

After reading that thread over a few more times and doing some more research, what I found is that what I am asking to do is impossible. IOS mail cannot follow rules made by exchange that are client side only. Sorting mail by keywords in the subject line is a rule that can only be applied on the client side and not the server side.

FBL5N - in Rule set - It is a Display customer line items

Dear All,
We observed that FBL5N - Display customer line items in Standard SoD rule set under function AR07 addressing a risk of S022.
Unless there are t-codes of FD03 or FB02 this t-code does not allow to change the payment terms of the customer.
We are having a challenge from the client that FBL5N is a display t-code and why it is there in rule set.
Has anybody came across this scenario? If yes, what is the underlying risk for this FBL5N independently.
Is there any SAP Note for this t-code like ME23N from SAP.
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Hi Christian,
We checked the authorization objects as well enabled in GRC rule set as below:
F_BKPF_BUK - Docume t Authorization document for company codes - 01 or 02 - Enable.
Inspite of this access, FBL5N cannot be used to change the document for payment terms and assignments without FB02 t-code
assignment in the role.
Independently FBL5N cannot be used for any change or create activity except Display customer line items.
Please advise
Thanks and Best Regards,
Srihari.K

Do you trust the SAP standard rule set ?

Hello all,
I have the impression that, too often, the SAP standard ruleset has been taken for granted : upload, generate and use. Here is a post as to why not to do so. Hopefuly, this will generate a interesting discussion.
As I have previously stated in other threads, you should be very careful accepting the SAP standard rule set without reviewing it first. Before accepting it, you should ensure that your specific SAP environment has been reflected in the functions. The 2 following questions deal with this topic :
1. what is your SAP release ? ---> 46C is different than ECC 6.0 in terms of permissions to be included in the function permission tab. With every SAP release, new authorization objects are linked to SAP standard tcodes. Subsequently some AUTHORITY-CHECK statements have been adapted in the ABAP behind the transaction code. So, other authorizations need to provided from an implementation point of view (PFCG). And thus, from an audit perspective (GRC-CC), other settings are due when filtering users' access rights in search for who can do what in SAP.
2. what are your customizing settings and master data settings ? --> depending on these answers you will have to (de)activate certain permissions in your functions. Eg. are authorization groups for posting periods, business areas, material types, ... being used ? If this is not required in the SAP system and if activated in SAP GRC function, then you filter down your results too hard, thereby leaving certain users out of the audit report while in reality they can actually execute the corresponding SAP functionality --> risk for false negatives !
Do not forget that the SAP standard ruleset is only an import of SU24 settings of - probably - a Walldorf system. That's the reason SAP states that the delivered rule set is a starting point.
So, the best practice is :
a. collect SAP specific settings per connector in a separate 'questionnaire' document, preferably structured in a database
b. reflect these answers per function per connector per action per permission by correctly (de)activating the corresponding permissions for all affected functions
You can imagine that this is a time-consuming process due to the amount of work and the slow interaction with the Java web-based GRC GUI. Therefore, it is a quite cumbersome and at times error-prone activity ...... That is, in case you would decide to implement your questionnaire answers manually. There are of course software providers on the market that can develop and maintain your functions in an off-line application and generate your rule set so that you can upload it directly in SAP GRC. In this example such software providers are particularly interesting, because your questionnaire answers are structurally stored and reflected in the functions. Any change now or in the future can be mass-reflected in all (hundreds / thousands of) corresponding permissions in the functions. Time-saving and consistent !
Is this questionnaire really necessary ? Can't I just activate all permissions in every function ? Certainly not, because that would - and here is the main problem - filter too much users out of your audit results because the filter is too stringent. This practice would lead too false negatives, something that auditors do not like.
Can't I just update all my functions based on my particular SU24 settings ? (by the way, if you don't know what SU24 settings are, than ask your role administrator. He/she should know. ) Yes, if you think they are on target, yes you can by deleting all VIRSA_CC_FUNCPRM entries from the Rules.txt export of the SAP standard rule set, re-upload, go for every function into change mode so that the new permissions are imported based on your SU24 settings. Also, very cumbersome and with the absolute condition that you SU24 are maintained excellent.
Why is that so important ? Imagine F_BKPF_GSB the auth object to check on auth groups on business areas within accounting documents. Most role administrator will leave this object on Check/Maintain in the SU24 settings. This means that the object will be imported in the role when - for example - FB01 has been added in the menu. But the role administrator inactivates the object in the role. Still no problem, because user doesn't need it, since auth groups on business areas are not being used. However, having this SU24 will result in an activated F_BKPF_GSB permission in your GRC function. So, SAP GRC will filter down on those users who have F_BKPF_GSB, which will lead to false negatives.
Haven't you noticed that SAP has deactivated quite a lot of permissions, including F_BKPF_GSB ? Now, you see why. But they go too far at times and even incorrect. Example : go ahead and look deeper into function AP02. There, you will see for FB01 that two permissions have been activated. F_BKPF_BEK and F_BKPF_KOA. The very basic authorizations needed to be able to post FI document are F_BKPF_BUK and F_BKPF_KOA. That's F_BKPF_BUK .... not F_BKPF_BEK. They have made a mistake here. F_BKPF_BEK is an optional auth object (as with F_BKPF_GSB) to check on vendor account auth groups.
Again, the message is : be very critical when looking at the SAP standard rule set. So, test thoroughly. And if your not sure, leave the job to a specialized firm.
Success !
Sam

Sam and everyone,
Sam brings up some good points on the delivered ruleset. Please keep in mind; however, that SAP has always stated that the delivered ruleset is a starting point. This is brought up in sap note 986996     Best Practice for SAP CC Rules and Risks. I completely agree with him that no company should just use the supplied rules without doing a full evaluation of their risk and control environment.
I'll try to address each area that Sam brings up:
1. Regarding the issue with differences of auth objects between versions, the SAP delivered rulset is not meant to be version specific. We therefore provide rules with the lowest common denominator when it comes to auth object settings.
The rules were created on a 4.6c system, with the exception of transactions that only exist in higher versions.
The underlying assumption is that we want to ensure the rules do not have any false negatives. This means that we purposely activate the fewest auth objects required in order to execute the transaction.
If new or different auth object settings come into play in the higher releases and you feel this results in false positives (conflicts that show that don't really exist), then you can adjust the rules to add these auth objects to the rules.
Again, our assumption is that the delivered ruleset should err on the side of showing too many conflicts which can be further filtered by the customer, versus excluding users that should be reported.
2. For the customizing settings, as per above, we strive to deliver rules that are base level rules that are applicable for everyone. This is why we deliver only the core auth objects in our rules and not all. A example is ME21N.
If you look at SU24 in an ECC6 system, ME21N has 4 auth objects set as check/maintain. However, in the rules we only enable one of the object, M_BEST_BSA. This is to prevent false negatives.
3. Sam is absolutely right that the delivered auth object settings for FB01 have a mistake. The correct auth object should be F_BKPF_BUK and not F_BKPF_BEK. This was a manual error on my part. I've added this to a listing to correct in future versions of the rules.
4. Since late 2006, 4 updates have been made to the rules to correct known issues as well as expand the ruleset as needed. See the sap notes below as well as posting Compliance Calibrator - Q2 2008 Rule Update from July 22.
1083611 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q3 2007
1061380 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q2 2006
1035070 Compliance Calibrator Rule Update Q1 2007
1173980 Risk Analysis and Remediation Rule Update Q2 2008
5. SAP is constantly working to improve our rulesets as we know there are areas where the rules can be improved. See my earlier post called Request for participants for an Access Control Rule mini-council from January 28, 2008. A rule mini-council is in place and I welcome anyone who is interested in joining to contact me at the information provided in that post.
6. Finally, the document on the BPX location below has a good overview of how companies should review the rules and customize them to their control and risk environment:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/bpx-grc
Under Key Topics - Access Control; choose document below:
    o GRC Access Control - Access Risk Management Guide   (PDF 268 KB)
The access risk management guide helps you set up and implement risk
identification and remediation with GRC Access Control.

Implications of Using a Rule to Populate Periodic Data in a YTD app

Is it bad practice to specify and populate an intersection with periodic data using rules when the application is set up as YTD?
For example:
Entity A has a $50 intercompany expense with Entity B. Entity B is reporting a $48 intercompany income with Entity A. We have a rule set up to populate a statistical "counterparty" account to show what the ICP is reporting. This way we can create custom SV and Financial Reports and also allow users to view info from entities (ICPs) in which they might not have access.
So the YTD line items are...
Entity A, ICP B shows interco_exp $50 and counterparty_interco_inc $48
Entity B, ICP A shows interco_inc $48 and counterparty_interco_exp $50
The question on Periodic vs YTD comes in when one entity is a different functional currency than the icp. Writing the rule is much easier using periodic data for P&L accounts (using the period fx rate to back into the functional currency of the entity).
Thoughts/suggestions?
Thanks.

This would be done in InfoPath.
Click on your Matter Name field and then select properties. For default value, select the data source as your other data source and then highlight the Matter name field. Click filter data and use the form field for Matter number.
Check out this article:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/bharatgupta/archive/2013/03/07/create-cascading-dropdown-in-browser-enabled-infopath-form-using-infopath-2010.aspx
Andy Wessendorf SharePoint Developer II | Rackspace [email protected]

How to migrate Master Data (Rule set etc.) from GRC 5.3 to 10.1 without using the "Migration Tool"

Greetings,
We are currently on GRC 5.3 SP 18 (Java ONLY) and migrating to GRC 10.1. I referred the Migration Guide which outlines that GRC 5.3 needs to be upgraded to SP 20 as pre-requisite for using the "Migration Tool" . Our BASIS team is reluctant to perform this upgrade from SP 18 to SP 20.
Having said thus, I'm exploring options of migrating data from 5.3 to 10.1 without using the "Migration Tool:.
Rule set Migration:
I'm in the process of preparing the 9 different files (listed below) and later utilize the "Upload Rule" option for migrating the Rule set data from 5.3 to 10.1.
While I'm able to gather data for most of the files I'm not sure how can I obtain the data pertaining to the two files (Function Actions and Function Permissions) underlined and highlighted in Red below.
1. Business Process
2. Function
3. Function Business Process
4. Function Actions
5 .Function Permissions
6. Rule Set
7. Risk
8. Risk Description
9. Risk Rule Set Relationship
10. Risk Owner Relationship
Can someone please enlighten me and share their experience with regards to this exercise. Really appreciate your help !
- Janantik.

I have done this successfully before. Because you are having issues, I would NOT recommend using the migration tool to move the ruleset. Instead:
1. Download the ruleset files from 5.3
2. The 5.3 tcode-permission file, which defines which tcode permissions from SU24 need to be checked during risk analysis, needs to be split into the two files you mention above in red.
FUNCTION_ACTION : this file represents S_TCODE objects and TCD fields mapped to each function (Function to Tcode relationship). In the 5.3 file, you will filter on object S_TCODE and field TCD, and you will get a complete list that now represents "FUNCTION_ACTION". BUT instead of having all the jumbled permission info, you will just have 3 columns: Function - Tcode - Status.
3. The remaining permissions that are left over, after taking out the S_TCODE -TCD items, represent the "FUNCTION_PERMISSION" file in GRC 10.
4. Manually create the excel spreadsheets for each file.
5. Copy and past each sheet to a unique .txt file.
6. Upload the ruleset manually through SPRO-->GRC-->Access Control-->Access Risk Analysis-->SoD Rules-->Upload SoD Rules.
7. Select each file and then upload to the correct Logical Group.
This is a huge pain, but it works. Let me know how this goes and if you need any assistance.
-Ken

Set up Network Load Balancing on an Azure VM

i have an VM on Azure, on which I have two AD LDS instances. I want to set up Network Load Balancing to have fault tolerance between the two AD LDS instances. when i start to create a new cluster, it shows me a message that DHCP will be turned off. i ignored
that one time, and what conspired was that i was unable to access the VM only. i had to set up my AD LDS instance on a different VM again.
is there any way which will enable me to set up the AD LDS instance properly on the VM?

Hi,
Firstly, if I understand correctly, you set up a cluster with only one VM? Based on my experience, you need to use two Azure VMs running AD LDS to configure Failover cluster.
In addition, did you mean that you cannot RDP into the VM after you created the cluster? If yes, which kind of error message you have received? Please check the Quick Glance of that VM on the
Azure management portal to make sure that all the parameters for that VM are displaying, especially for the internal IP address.
Furthermore, it seems that the question is related to Azure Virtual Machines, I recommend you to ask in Azure Virtual Machine forum below for further assistance:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=WAVirtualMachinesforWindows
Best regards,
Susie

Rule Sets to control application access

Oracle documentation mention Rule Sets to prevent authorized applications to read data from the database. E.g pl/sql developer.
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/server.111/b31222/cfseappr.htm
In Oracle Database Vault, you can create a secure application role that you enable with an Oracle Database Vault rule set. Regular Oracle Database secure application roles are enabled by custom PL/SQL procedures. You use secure application roles to prevent users from accessing data from outside an application. This forces users to work within the framework of the application privileges that have been granted to the role.
But I cannot find an example showing how to set this up? Could anyone point me in the right direction?
Thanks

Hi elOpalo,
elOpalo wrote:
One idea is ... You can assign a token to user and save it in session to test whether he can access the page (e.g. from bookmark)).
The second idea is to save a special attribute in request's scope and pass the user to pageX.jsp ... Of course You need to assign different attributes before each pageX.jsp.Can you please elaborate more? I am not able to understand because both approaches have in common is storing some token/attribute but in different scopes as below:
approach one suggest to *assign a token to the user and store in session*
approach two suggest to *save a special attribute and store in request scope*
I am explaining what I have understood and you please testifies it:
Approach a:
When ever user requests for any pageX.jsp, First check that weather all required data for requested page is available in session or not. If available let user access the page and if not forward him to correct flow. This requires lots of checking on each page and when there are large number of pages in the application it will be a tedious task to manage this check. I am not so sure about storing token in the session which you suggested.
Approach b:
As This looks similar to storing token as in approach a. I am not so sure about this also that what and how to do this?
Please explain more and you can also suggest me any tutorial or references you may have, I'll surely read that and try this out.
Thanking you,
Tejas

RAR: Global Rule set

Hi,
I am wondering if the latest global rule set contains the tcodes, authorization objects and values based on the latest version of SAP? If yes, can this global rule set be applicable for SAP version 4.7 ?
Thanks,
Debbie

Hello Rajesh,
Hope this information from SAP helps you.RAR Rule Update - Documentation
It is not possible to programmatically send out updates to the default ruleset (i.e. via transports or STMS).
This is because rule uploads only overwrite and not append. As every company should have made changes to their ruleset, SAP cannot send out rule updates as this would overwrite the customization done by each company
Since the SAP acquisition of Virsa, there have been seven updates to the supplied ruleset which are described in detail in SAP notes below.
1061380 u2013 Q2 2006
1035070 u2013 Q1 2007
1083611 u2013 Q3 2007
1173980 u2013 Q2 2008
1326497 u2013 Q2 2009
1446680 u2013 Q2 2010
1604722 u2013 Q3 2011
These notes provide a company a detailed Word document that summarizes the changes made.
The company must go through these changes to evaluate if they agree with the SAP supplied change.
If they agree, the company will have to make the change manually via the Rule Architect.
To get more details, please refer to note#986996
Regards,
Renuka

Drop rule set

Hi,
I have only the following object (rule set) on my schema.
OBJECT_NAME     OBJECT_TYPE
DEV_QUEUE_R     RULE SET
I tried to drop with with following syntax:
exec DBMS_RULE_ADM.DROP_RULE_SET(
rule_set_name => 'DEV1.DEV_QUEUE_R',
delete_rules => false);
But following error shown:
ORA-24170
string.string is created by AQ, cannot be dropped directly
Cause: This object is created by AQ, thus cannot be dropped directly
Action: use dbms_aqadm.drop_subscriber to drop the object
And I couldn't find the exact syntaxt of this. Can anyone help me with the exact syntax of DBMS_AQADM.DROP_SUBSCRIBER?
Thanks.
BANNER
Oracle Database 11g Release 11.1.0.6.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
CORE     11.1.0.6.0     Production
TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
Edited by: Nadvi on Jul 22, 2010 4:03 PM

Ok, I found the solution.
select * from user_objects;
OBJECT_TYPE OBJECT_NAME STATUS
------------------------------ RULE AQ$WF_DEFERRED_QUEUE_M$1 VALID
RULE SET AQ$WF_DEFERRED_QUEUE_M$1 INVALID
1.Set the following event at session level:
alter session set events '25475 trace name context forever, level 2';
2. Drop rule:
execute DBMS_RULE_ADM.DROP_RULE('.AQ$WF_DEFERRED_QUEUE_M$1',TRUE);
commit;
3.Drop rule set :
execute DBMS_RULE_ADM.DROP_RULE_SET('AQ$WF_DEFERRED_QUEUE_M$1');
commit;
4. Connect as SYSTEM or SYSDBA and try to drop user again.
drop user <user> cascade;
Thanks

The type Set is not generic; it cannot be parameterized with arguments K ?

When I use Hashtable or HashMap to get the keySet, it shows the error of "The type Set is not generic; it cannot be parameterized with arguments <K>".
The following is my code:
Hashtable table = new Hashtable();
table.put("A", new Integer(1));
table.put("B", new Integer(2));
Iterator its = table.keySet().iterator(); // <<<<<<<<<<<<<< this line shows the error "The type Set is not generic; it cannot be parameterized with arguments <K>"
How can I solve it? Please help me! I have no idea on it. It works fine in 1.4.
Best regards,
Eric

The original is my codes, please help!
public static List findDlicApp(Date startDate, Date endDate, Connection con) {
          String SQL = getSQL("app.sql");
          String where = getSQL("app.sql.where");
          boolean hasWhere = false;
          if (startDate != null) {
               SQL = SQL + " where d.create_date >= to_date('" + DMSUtil.convertDateToString(startDate) + "', 'yyyy-MM-dd')";
               hasWhere = true;
          if (endDate != null) {
               if (hasWhere) {
                    SQL = SQL + " and to_date(to_char(d.create_date, 'yyyy-mm-dd'), 'yyyy-mm-dd') <= to_date('" + DMSUtil.convertDateToString(endDate) + "', 'yyyy-MM-dd')";
               } else {
                    SQL = SQL + " where to_date(to_char(d.create_date, 'yyyy-mm-dd'), 'yyyy-mm-dd') <= to_date('" + DMSUtil.convertDateToString(endDate) + "', 'yyyy-MM-dd')";
               hasWhere = true;
          if (hasWhere) {
               SQL = SQL + " and " + where;
          } else {
               SQL = SQL + " where " + where;
          SQL = SQL + " " + getSQL("app.sql.order");
          //System.out.println(SQL);
          //Connection con = getParaDMConnection("findDlicApp");
          HashMap<String, DlicApp> dlicDocs = new HashMap<String, DlicApp>();
          List result = new ArrayList();
          try {
               Statement stmt = con.createStatement();
               ResultSet rs = stmt.executeQuery(SQL);
               long lastDocID = 0;
               boolean hasStartDate = false;
               while(rs.next()) {
                    long docID = rs.getLong("docID");
                    String docName = rs.getString("docName");
                    String refNo = rs.getString("refNo");
                    java.util.Date createDate = rs.getDate("createDate");
                    String creator = rs.getString("creator");
                    String profileType = rs.getString("profileType");
                    String assunto = rs.getString("assunto");
                    String fromEntity = rs.getString("fromEntity");
                    String location = getLocation(docID, con);
                    long fieldID = rs.getLong("fieldID");
                    String fieldValue = rs.getString("fValue");
                    DlicApp doc = null;
                    if (dlicDocs.containsKey(String.valueOf(docID))) {
                         doc = (DlicApp)dlicDocs.get(String.valueOf(docID));
                    } else {
                         doc = new DlicApp();
                    doc.setId(docID);
                    doc.setDocName(docName);
                    doc.setReferenceNo(refNo);
                    doc.setCreateDate(createDate);
                    doc.setCreator(creator);
                    doc.setProfileType(profileType);
                    doc.setAssunto(assunto);
                    doc.setFrom(fromEntity);
                    //if (doc.getStartDate() == null) {
                    //     doc.setStartDate(createDate);
                    doc.setLocation(location);
                    if (fieldValue != null) {
                         if (fieldID == 1114) {
                              doc.setChineseName(fieldValue);
                         if (fieldID == 1115) {
                              doc.setPortugueseName(fieldValue);
                         if (fieldID == 1116) {
                              doc.setApplicationCategory(fieldValue);
                         if (fieldID == 1118) {
                              doc.setStatus(fieldValue);
                         if (fieldID == 1119) {
                              Date d = DMSUtil.parseDate(fieldValue, "yyyy-MM-dd");
                              doc.setStartDate(d);
                              hasStartDate = true;
                         if (fieldID == 1120) {
                              Date d = DMSUtil.parseDate(fieldValue, "yyyy-MM-dd");
                              if (!StringUtils.isEmpty(fieldValue)) {
                                   //System.out.println(docName + ":" + fieldValue + ">>>>>>>>>findDlicApp>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>APP END DATE: " + d);
                                   doc.setEndDate(d);
                    if (docID != lastDocID) {
                         doc.setRelatedDocs(findRelatedDoc(docID, con));
                         lastDocID = docID;
                    dlicDocs.put(String.valueOf(docID), doc);
               stmt.close();
               rs.close();
               Iterator<String> its = dlicDocs.keySet().iterator();
               while(its.hasNext()) {
                    String id = (String)its.next();
                    DlicApp a = (DlicApp)dlicDocs.get(id);
                    a.setRelatedDocs(findRelatedDoc(a.getId(), con));
                    dlicDocs.put(id, a);
               result.addAll(dlicDocs.values());
               // take out start date is not in the given period
               int n = 0;
               while(true) {
                    if (n < result.size()) {
                         DlicApp a = (DlicApp)result.get(n);
                         Date sd = a.getStartDate();
                         if (!isWithin(sd, startDate, endDate)) {
                              result.remove(n);
                         } else {
                              n++;
                    } else {
                         break;
          } catch(Exception e) {
               e.printStackTrace();
          if (result.size() > 0) {
               Collections.sort(result, new DmsDocComparator());
          return result;
     }Edited by: EJP on 13/01/2011 14:41: added code tags for you. Please use them next time.

HT4847 I am unable to delete the last backup from icloud, i checked my all device setting but it still say "cannot delete icloud this time because it is in use,"Please tell me what should i do.

I am unable to delete the last backup from icloud, i checked my all device setting but it still say "cannot delete icloud this time because it is in use,"Please tell me what should i do

It still didn't work...
Within this commonfiles\apple folder, there is only one folder, labeled "Internet Services." Within this folder, there are 6 folders, labeled:
APLZOD.resources
BookmarkDAV_client.resources
CoreDAV.resources
iCloud.resources
iCloudServices.resources
ShellStreams.resources
Within all but CoreDAV and BookmarkDAV_client, there are multiple different folders, all labeled starting with a two letter (acronym I believe, for different languages) then .lproj (for example, a folder is labeled "ar.lproj".
In each of the folders of APLZOD.resources, there is a file labeled "APLZODlocalized.dll."
In all of the folders containing the multiple .lproj folders, there are likewise "name"localized.dll files contained.
In the BookmarkDAV_client and Core DAV folders, they each contain only one file, "Info.plist"
I attempted to delete all of these files, and still, the FileAssassin could not delete them. I unlocked one of them for instance, and I tried to delete the file myself (thru windows explorer and just clicking delete), and I still had the same issue of coming eventually to the window requesting me to "try again" to have permission.
What can I do?? I'd like to avoid Unlocker, but if it really is a reliable and SAFE program, and someone knows a SAFE place to download it from, I'd appreciate it very much so!!
thanks!!

Settlement rule set to Periodic, remaining balance cannot be settled

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for