Settlement thru KO8G

A WBS actual settlement  through KO8G is throughing an error - ''Acquisition value negative in area 01". What does it mean? Does it mean that actual settlement not possible to AUCs assets.
I see for Book Value (01), for the particular assets there is only planned value and no posted value.
Thanks all for the help.
Regards
Bharat

Hi
plz check if for that particular asset any negative acquisition are alloawed. in asset accounting there is any option of this type.plz check in Ab08 any negative acquisition posting have been done for that particulat asset.
kalidindi

Similar Messages

  • Define back ground job for Maintenance Order Settlement through KO8G

    Hi Experts,
    I need to define back ground job for Maintenance Order Settlement through KO8G transaction code.
    Here are the requirements
    1. The job should run on weekly basis automatically.
    2. The settlement period and posting period should be taken care by the job dynamically. i.e. if the job runs in July, the job should pick up Settlement period and posting period as 7 automatically.
    Kindly let me know the steps to define the back ground job as per above requirement.
    Sanjeev

    To run the KO8G  each week, the a RECURRING job has to be created.  At my job, Basis/Ops department would create and schedule the job.
    To have the posting periods, dates etc dynamically determined at the time the job runs:
    Create the variant and save.
    In 5.0, KO8G does not save a variant, therefore, go to SE38 and create a variant for program: RKO7KO8G
    When you go to the ATTRIBUTES screen, to add a name and description, you will see a list of all the fields that are part of the selection criteria. 
    For an example, I frequently use the Posting Date. To the right of the screen is a field called Selection Variable, click on the drop box and select D - Dynamic Date Calculation.
    Go to field NAme of variable, click on drop box and select the variable you want.
    Each field has its own list of selection variable and name of variable depending on how it works in the progra.
    If you look at Posting period you will see:
         T: Table Variable from TVARVC
         B: User-defined variables
    I do not know about User defined variables, but for TVARC there is thread that leads to a "how to" blog
    [How create a variable in the TVARVC that calculate the last week]
    do some more searching and you should find more answers
    Good luck
    Althea

  • How to change the IO status to CLOSE after it has been settled through ko8g

    hi ,
    I have the following scenario : An internal order is assigned to a PO and after setllement of such an order i need to CLOSE the order .
    The PO has a GR done (no IR) . Currently Internal Order is in the status : TECO [technically complete] and setlement has ben doneusing Actual Settlemnet Run using KO8G.
    Now i need to change the IO status to  [ CLOSE ] : it is gving an error in KO02 : Balance is not zero .
    How  to change the Internal Order status to CLOSE or rather how to make teh balance in that Order toZero?
    Is it reqd to process some GR's for teh same PO ?
    Thansk
    Trina

    Hi,
    Check the order balance in Ko02
    Menu -->  Extras  -->  Order Balance if balance exist it means that the order has not completely settled.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Settlement with KO8G

    Hi,
    We are running KO8G for collective settlement of work orders & finding some orders in Inappropriate status without explaination of what are those order nos. need to know is there any report in CO or table where
    1. We can find out all the orders which are settled with their values.
    2. Inappropriate order nos & their resaon.
    3. Any CO report that gives total values posted in orders in Company code or at plant level & how much has been settled till date or period.
    Your early response to this will be highly appreciated.
    Regards,
    Vipin Arora

    Hello
    When you process KO8G go to Extras >  Help on Help Log, here you will
    see the following information for 'Inappropriate Status':
    Inappropriate status           Number of senders that are not
                                   to be settled for the following reasons:
                                   - The sender still has the status
                                     "Created".
                                   - The sender is already closed.
                                   - The sender has been flagged
                                     for deletion.
                                   - The sender has been deleted.
                                   - The sender is a production
                                     order that has no results
                                     analysis key and has
                                     neither been technically
                                     completed nor finally delivered
                                     in the settlement period.
                                     The sender has been settled
                                     using worklists and has a
                                     status that prevents settlement
                                     (such as Locked).
    You will need to check the selection criteria of the variant being used
    to determine the orders which fall into this criteria.
    If you wish to see the orders included in the category inappropriate
    status, you can try to use the Flow Trace for settlements to
    see if this can give you the details you require.
    If not then you should look to the selection variant that is being used
    and whether or not certain status's are being selected and try to
    exclude the status that are mentioned in the long text:
    - Created
    - Closed
    - Flagged for deletion
    - Technically Completed
    Regards
    Javier Reviriego

  • Travel Expense Settlement thru Payroll

    Hi All,
    How to integrate Travel Management with Payroll for posting travel settlement amount to Payroll.
    Post trip, payment to employee / Recovery from Employee. i.e. settlement needs to be done thru Payroll. SAP Table V_PTRV_HEAD provides the structure of expenses.  This table provide various data filelds, like payment, travel advance, total expenditure etc, My question is how to take value from SUM_PAYOUT (Payment) from Table V_PTRV_HEAD and put into the payroll as the Travel Settlement amount.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Mandar Ranade

    Hi,
    After the trip is settled, the payroll driver program will pick up the trip results and the expenses are dispalyed in the payslip.
    Check the payroll schema of the country.(transaction PE01).
    For example, G000 (Great Britain accounting schema). make sure GREI is activated in the payroll schema to pick up the travel expenses through payroll.
    If you see a * infront of Travel expenses, it means GREI is inactive. You should make it active.
    Hope this helps..
    Thanks,
    Praisty

  • Internal order settlement through KO8G

    Hi gurus,
    I have created variant sapvar and given inputs int he following fields
    Order type
    Order
    Controlling area
    Company code
    and selected the orders tobe settled
    with selection of all the status
    and executed
    But the system is giving the error
    zero sender settled and
    No settlement for this sender
    I have the IO with settlement profile defined, still it is not picking up
    Kindly do the needful in fixing this problem as soon aspossible
    Thanking you
    Ritu

    Hi Ritu,
    Just check if there are any values posted for the selected orders for the specific date range through transaction code KOB1.
    You could have selected a different settlement period otherwise on KO8G.
    If you need more info, pl. do reply.
    Warm Regards,
    Som

  • KO8G open work order settlement

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep
    Edited by: Pradeep Giri on May 30, 2009 4:07 AM

    Hey Vanessa,
    Sorry i have been really busy with work off late. I just got a moment and wanted to thank you for the help.
    I found a solution for it, we had FMDERIVE default the fund on the accounts used in WIP settlement as they are dedicated for those process.
    The cost is picked from the order and deposited on the P&L account which is now attached to the fund and this is further transferred to the balance sheet account with the fund information.
    Problem solved.
    Do you see any other implications on this?
    Thanks again.
    Pradeep

  • Open Work Order settlement - KO8G or KO88

    Hi,
    I am facing an issue with open work order settlement using KO8G or KO88.
    We are on 6.0 and PSM turned and New GL activated with a document splitting on fund mandatory flag turned on.
    When open work orders undergo WIP calculation through KKAI, it shows the the calculated amount in the GL account but when we execute KO88 or KO8G to settle this open work order amount to the GL, it gives me the below error
    GLT2201 "Balancing field "Fund" in line item 001 not filled"
    On debugging the KO88, its seen that the field fund does not flow in from the work order.
    This means that both my P&L accounts and my balance sheet accounts that offset the WIP posting does not have the fund field (which is a mandatory field for posting any document in the system).
    Has anyone come across such a situation?
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Pradeep

    Ashok,
    Thanks for the reply.
    We have a user exit to populate the order during its creation. this means the fund field is already residing on the order. so during settlement process, closed orders dont have a problem but when open orders are subject to settlement i.e WIP settlement, the cost on the order is not transferred to the GL account because of the fund missing as our financial statements should be balances by fund.
    Do you think an user exit can suffice this ? have you ever tried or come across such a scenario.
    Thanks
    Pradeep

  • Error while AUC settlement

    Hi
    This is with reference to the settlement of assets under construction to final asset.
    We have maintained the settlement rule properly and while settlement thru T Code AIBU, getting following error:-
    Transaction type 345 not possible (posting to affiliated company)
    Message no. AA390
    Diagnosis
    For the current document, you specified either implicitly (via the customer/vendor), or explicitly (with a manual entry), that this posting is to an affiliated company. In this case, Asset Accounting requires you to use special transaction types. This enables the system to separately identify such transactions. Procedure Check the line items that you have already entered, and the transaction type you entered.
    We have tried to resolve the problem thru SAP note no 143410 but not able to settle the AUC.
    Members are requested to look into it and guide us for step by step correction.
    Regards,
    DD

    Hi Paul
    Thanks for reply. yes I start the resolve the problem with note no 143410. But did not got result. then only I start looking other solution.
    I wrote to SAP and got following reply:-
    VBUND is either filled in the master data of account to be posted or it is filled in a substition or an exit. Please check this two cases.
    In transaction AIBU the VBUND information can´t be filled. The transaction type 345 therefore is delivered in Table TABW without VBUND info (XAVERB / XABERBN) so error AA390 is correctly displayed
    when field VBUND is filled.
    The only exception in transaction AIBU is explained in note 718533.
    The logic of a normal settlement from AUC to a normal fixed assets is always without a trading partner. Therefore the message appears in AIBU.
    We hope this helps you. For more information please contact your Local SAP Consultant. Kindly close the message at your comfort.
    But from above reply I am not able to conclude the solution. If you can understand the same pl convey to me
    Request you and other member also to help me the resolve the problem.
    Regards
    DD

  • CCS Details are not getting updated to COPA in Sales Order Settlement(VA88)

    Dear Experts,
    Our scenario is MTO with valuated material.
    1. Production order is tagged to Sales Order.
    2. Production order is settled to Material and variance is getting posted to COPA.
    3. At the time of Delivery, COGS Debit (Cost Object- Sales Order), Credit - Inventory.
    4. At the time of Billing, Accounting Document is getting generated, COPA document is not getting generated.
    5. We  are not executing WIP. (as per Business process)
    6. Settlement is done thru transaction code VA88. COPA Document is getting generated.
    I am facing the following issues in the above MTO process.
    1. At time of sales order settlement thru VA88, In COPA, only COGS is getting as updated with one value field i.e. Material Cost.  Cost Component data (Material Depreciation, Labor etc..) is not getting updated to COPA.
    2. When I settle the Sales Order thru VA88, Billing Quantity is not getting updated to COPA though Quantity field mapping is done properly.
    Please help me how to resolve the above issues.
    Note: Same Cost Component Structure, we are using for Make to Stock scenario. Cost Component Data is getting updated Properly to COPA  (at the time of Billing)
    Regards,
    vgl
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:52 AM
    Edited by: vglokam on Aug 31, 2010 10:54 AM

    Hi
    1. CCS (Cost Comp Split) wont be updated to COPA if you settle via sale order.. In sale order, COGS cost element is posted.. the same will get settled to COPA as one single value...
    In MTS, the CCS gets updated to COPA upon billing because of the "valuation" strategy customization... Billing posts to COPA in that case, COPA gets Sales Qty and it is valuated with CCS to give you the break up.. But, in your case, Billing is not posting to COPA, but to sales order.. hence, there is no qty flow into COPA upon billing.. thats why you dont get CCS for MTO
    2. The sales qty should be updated to COPA upon VA88.. For this, make the following settings in your PA transfer structure which is used during VA88
    1. Go to KEI1, Select your PA transfer structure...
    2. Add an assignment line in it... Check on "Qty Billed/Delivered" in the assignment line
    3. In the Tab "Value Field" below "source", assign Qty Field
    Now when you settle, it should update qty as well
    regards
    Ajay M

  • Automatic creation AUC sub assets at the time of settlement

    Hi,
    I have created the investment profile,AUC asset class,Source structuce(Hard,Pave and Soft) and cost element group(Hard,Pave and soft) . Then assign these three source structure to Investment profile.
    I created WBS element under project and released the WBS.
    After that I posted the values against the WBS different cost element . At the time of AUC seetlement thru CJ88.I am getting Three AUC asset with Sub number -0(1000-0,1001-0 and 1002-0) automaticaly. But Business is expecting to settle automatically(1000-0(Hard),1000-1(Pave),1000-2(Soft) respectively.
    Is there any way to settle AUC sub asset wise(Eg: 1000-0, 1000-1 ans 1000-2)automatically.
    Please share your suggestion on this.
    Appreciate your help!
    Regards,
    Prakash Reddy.

    Hello VIrendra,
    I am trying to settle WBS to AUC settlement thru CJ88. In this case We need to settle WBS to  AUC sub number wise 0,1 and 2 respectively based on the cost element. Is there any settings required to create AUC asset sub number wise creation?
    Thanks& Regards,
    Prakash Reddy.

  • Thru MEB4 the Tax amount and Tax percenatage not trigger in Background Job

    Hi,
              When I am executing the T.Code- MEB4 (Rebate Settlement) thru Foreground the Vendor Rebate Amount and Tax are showing.
                                      When I am executing in Background job the Tax amount and Tax Percentage are not triggering (Only the Rebate amount only showing) after execution of Background job in when viewing the job display.
                       Background Job Name: RWMBON01.
       Please suggest.

    Shankar,
    Thanks for reply.
    If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
    I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
    I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E  SP 22   to 4.7 E  SP30.
    My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
    If any suitable answer appreciatable.
    Thanks once again for your reply.

  • Actual settlement: Orders !! help

    Hello to everyone, first at all thanx.
    when i am using the transaction "K08G" Actual settlement: Orders, and i recover the settlement period ( period 9 ) , fiscal year 2009 and execute it ....
    Appear a quantity " 12.207u20AC " and it is wrong cos  In G/L account Line item display, there are four  line/ items and i can clear it 2 to 2 .
    I hope the system read something wrong cos ... it four line / item have got  a value date 09.2009 then in Actual settlement: Orders must be appear NILL " 0 " .
    For that i need change or repair december 2008 and september 2009. Cos it items have got a  document date ( 28.09.2009 and 31.12.2008 ).
    How can i repair it ????  the year 2008 is close!! any idea???
    thank you very much

    dear Dave
    thanks for your advise, we can not change the current filed customizing.
    I am not able to understand why , even if in the Maintain Allocation Structures we have defined a specific Settlement Cost Elements (for exp 600019) during the actual settlement (TCODE KO8G) for some order the system doesn't respect the allocation structure definition.
    some one can help me?
    regards
    marco

  • Actual Settlement Orders problem

    Dear SAP GURU
    when we run the actual settlement orders transaction (KO8G) for some internl order the system doesn't respect the settlement rule, the GL account is different, I mean, the right settlement should be:
    CR GL Account 600019
    DB GL Account Asset Under Costruction
    for some internal order the system doesn't respect this rule and the posting is:
    CR GL Account 600010
    DB GL Account Asset Under Costruction
    first GL account is different. 
    Some advise in order to understand what happen, because apparently the io master data are correct, even the settlement rule.
    Maybe some can help me!
    Thanks a lot
    marco

    dear Dave
    thanks for your advise, we can not change the current filed customizing.
    I am not able to understand why , even if in the Maintain Allocation Structures we have defined a specific Settlement Cost Elements (for exp 600019) during the actual settlement (TCODE KO8G) for some order the system doesn't respect the allocation structure definition.
    some one can help me?
    regards
    marco

  • Settlement to projects

    Hi,
    I have created a Prod. Order, released and confirmed also.
    But now when i am going for settlement thru ko88...it is throwing an error....."There are no accrued amount, settlement is not possible".
    Plz suggest wat c'ld i left or some thing wrong i did???
    Thanks

    Dear,
    I think full confirmation is not carried out for this production order. Check the confirmation is completed and also complete the TECO.
    In order to solve the error you are receiving please apply the
    OSS note 179533. Hope this helps you.
    Please maintain the config in OKG8 for RA category "RUCR".
    You can check what is error caused in tcode KO88 by activating the trace during test run.
    Regards,
    R.Brahmankar

Maybe you are looking for