Settlement to FXA
Hi,
Please let me know whether it is possible to settle a WBS element of one cocode say 1000 to AUC of another coocode 2000.
I am getting an error message of It is not normally possible to enter a combination such as this.
This is probably due to a system error.
Please let me know is there any way to settle this.My settlemnt profile also allows to settle to a Fixed asset.
Thanks
yes it is possible
you are allowed to create the asset in one company code and settle to another
you need to enter Req co code in WBS see help below -
Requesting company code
Key of the company code that requests the investment measure (order or WBS element).
Use
The requesting company code is important in Investment Management for several reasons:
The requesting company code is the company code in which the asset under construction for an investment measure is managed.
You only need to enter a requesting code if the asset under construction belonging to an investment measure (order or WBS element) should be managed in a different company code than the investment measure (cross-company-code settlement of asset under construction). Otherwise the requesting company code is the same as the company code of the investment measure (order or WBS element).
When you enter a requesting cost center, the system adopts the company code of the cost center as the requesting company code.
Similar Messages
-
AUC settlement to other than FXA
Hi Fellows,
We have a number of assets under construction, which have now have changed circumstances. the original plan was to settle the assets then start depreciation as normal. However a change in business operation now means that the assets are now to partially sold to a third party and partially written off to expenses and the balance settled to a depreciating asset.
When settling a project it is possible to settle to FXA Fixed Asset, CTR Cos Centre, G/L General Ledger and SDI Sales Document Item, however when settling an asset under construction currently the only option available in our system is currently FXA Fixed Asset.
For Assets Under Construction is it possible to settle the AUC to anything other than Fixed Asset? If it is could you please advise on configuring the above options
Thanks & RegardsHi
It is OKO7
Please search the forums for more.
Rgds,
Zub -
Settlement rule for AUC not automatically generated
Hi Experts,
I am working on a capital project scenario where I have configured the investment profile and assigned this to the project profile. I have also configured the settlement profile and allocation structure for settlement to FXA.
On release of the WBS element the AUC is automatically created.
I have posted costs to the WBS element.
When I run settlement in test mode, using CJ88 the details show the sender as the WBS element and the reciever as the AUC, and the amount = the cost posted to the WBS element in the posting period, (as expected)
However, (now my problem)
When I run settlement in "update" mode the settlement shows 1 settlement however when I drill down to see the sender or reciever details are blank. There are alno no accouting documents and a settlement rule does not display for the WBS element. There are no error messages even though the settlement has not taken effect.
Please can anyone advise on the possible cause of this error. One further point the document type on the settlement profile is configured as "SA" GL Account Document.
Thanks in advance.
Ianhi,
Go to Settlement rule (CJ02),where enter the WBS .here go to Extra in the menu bar of that WBS ,under Asset under construction ckeck the box of Historiy....something like that .
Regards
Ricky -
Hi All,
When am trying to settle one internal order to an asset, System is selecting the amount from all the cost elements which have carried the cost. But if i want to settle only from one cost element how should i do that.
Ex:
Order 700002
Cost element 140001: 70000
Cost element 140002: 55000
Now i want to settlement from 140002.
Settlement rule: FXA 170002-0 28000
Please can some one solve this issue.
Thanks,
Rama Murali.Hi,
This could not be possible as per my knowledge. Internal Order will be settle in full.
However you can define the % of amount to be settled but you cannot define the Cost element.
For your solution, Create one Internal Order and transfer the amount of Cost Center 1400001 and then settle it separately
Thanks,
Ankur -
Hello,
Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Lakshmi.Hi,
Please follow above mentioned points
Allocation structure added settlement with FXA. -- Path - SPRO - IMG - Investment Management - Projects as Investment Measures - Settlement -- Maintain Allocation Structures -create on Allocation structure - and assignment - 010 -- Material & service cost -- and select - click on - source - give Cost elements - from - to
and click on settlement cost element - give receiver category -- FXA - check box for By cost element -- and save it ,
2.Maintain Settlement Profiles -- Define Settlement Profile -- XX - WBSE Settlement Profile
select radio button - to be settled in full , give allocated structure ,
Default object type FXA Asset
select all indicators -- and give other parameter -- Document type -- AA or as per requirement
and Assign Settlement Profile to Project Profile
3.New Asset class creation with line items settlement -- Investment Management -- Projects as Investment Measures -- Master Data --Assets under Construction --Define Asset Classes ==
give- Account determination -- asset class , scr layout rule -- capital investment measure ,
give number range --whichever is created
status of AuC -- select radio button -- Investment Measure
Save it ,
Now you can create Project - Run -- CJ88 for settlement
Thanking you
Regards
Mahesh -
Hello,
Can anybody help to do the configuration for wbs settlement with AUC other than below mentioned configuration.
1. New Asset class creation with line iteme settlement.
2. Allocaiton structure added settlement with FXA.
3. New settlement profile created with default object type FXA,document type AA and amount settlement check box activated.
but based on above mentioned configuration i am not moving forward, kindly suggest any more configuration need for this requirement.
Thanks for your advance help.
Regards,
Lakshmi.Hi Lakshmi,
There are quite a few settings to be maintained. I do not remember exact sequence of steps but here are a few pointers.
1. Investment profile needs to be created with 'line item settlement'
2. AUC asset class to be created and assigned to this investment profile
3. Investment profile to be linked to project profile.
4. Source structure to be assigned to investment profile
There may be other steps I am missing but I hope these help.
Also, if you mention any error that you are facing or at which point you are getting stuck, it would be helpful.
Regards -
Where to configure Account Assignment Category for WBS Settlement Rule?
Hi,
I would like to know where is the Account Assignment Category for WBS settlement rule (FXA, CTR, G/L, WBS) being configured. (SPRO Path)
Currently when I go to our settlement rule creation screen I can only see WBS and FXA, I need to add MAT (Material)
Thanks!
Regards,
VivianHi Shrikant,
Do you mean in my CJ02 WBS Settlement Rule creation screen, I cannnot put MAT as account assignment category?
Does it mean that WBS element CANNOT be settled to material? and we can only settle PM order to material?
Thanks!
Regards,
Vivian -
CJ88 Settlement Processing Type
Hi,
I would like to know the correct "Processing Type" to specify in Actual Settlement run (CJ88) for settling to Asset Under Construction (AUC) and Final Asset. Please confirm if it is correct to use "By Period" for settling to AUC and use "Full Settlement" to settle to Final Assets.
Thanks!
Vivianwe enter processing type in the intial screen of project settlement which controlls the settlement process.
With processing type By period : only distribution rules with settlement types to PER ( Periodic Settlement ), PRE( preliminary settlement ) & AUC ( Asset under settlement ) are taken in to account.
How ever settlement to AUC will happens at last. So, if with this sequence if you have maintained any settlement type PRE( Preliminary ) , it will consider it first & therefoe settle cost portions that are not to be capitalised.
If I say in the context of your question,
With the first settlement of WBs sys automaticallty generates a distribution rules for the settlement type AUC. If you don't want to settle all the cost of WBS to AUC, you must enter additional distribution rule for the debit to other receivers that are not to be capitalised. Use settlement type PRE ( Preliminary ) to ensure that these distribution rules are taken into account before the settlement to AUC.
Once the Assset under construction Phase is completed, create a completed asset. We does the same in Cj20n. next, define the distribution rules in the WBS element with settlement type FUL for the cost portion to be capitalised and enter the completed asset as receiver.
Not that distribution rule with settlement type FUL is only taken in to account in the project settlement if you ahve used Partial Capitalisation / automatic as the processing type
So, in short
when you want to settle to AUC use the distribution rules with settlement type AUC (generated by sys) & processing type periodic
when you want to settle to FXA you should use the settlement type Full & processing type partail capitalisation / automatic.
However the processing type Full settlement is used for the settlement rules with distribution rules of settlement type PER ( Periodic ) only, in to check weather the balance still exists in the object after the settlement due to debits to previous periods.
So, don't get confued with settlement type FUL (full settlement ) & processing type Full settlement. ( processing type full settlement has nothing to do with AUC )
Regards
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Patoliya on Dec 12, 2008 9:43 AM -
Hi,
Please explain to us how we do the settlement to final asset in PS. Thank you.So in short
u2022 When you want to settle to AUC use the distribution rules with settlement type AUC (generated by system) & processing type periodic.
u2022 When you want to settle to FXA you should use the settlement type Full & processing type partial capitalization / automatic.
However the processing type Full settlement is used for the settlement rules with distribution rules of settlement type PER (Periodic) only, in to check weather the balance still exists in the object after the settlement due to debits to previous periods.
So, don't get confused with settlement type FUL (full settlement) & processing type Full settlement. (Processing type full settlement has nothing to do with AUC)
Regards,
ANSAR -
Without IM how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset
Dear all
without IM, how can i settle construction project to AUC and asset.
can someone explain it in details?
thanks a lot.
Judythanks for all of your answers.
i create the investment profile and assgin it to the project profile.
when i release the project, i see the system status changed from crtd to release and AUC.
when i do cj88, the costs are settled to the AUC No. automatically.
could you tell me how the AUC No. is created? where does it configure?
when AUC is settled to FXA, what are the procedures?
first TECO the project and then do CJ88, am I correct?
thanks a lot
Judy -
MAP ANLE item to specific line item in FI
Hello SAP Guru,
Good day!
We ahve a requirement to map asset values to particular purchase order. And if the amount settle to the Fixed Asset came from AUC, we can map the original FI document number in table ANLE. Thats right, we can find the original FI document number in the ANLE table field "Original Document Number". Original document number can came from MIRO which came from PO that is settled to WBS (which is eventually settle to FXA) or came from direct posting to the WBS. Sometimes, there are line item in the FI document that has no PO number. Is there a way to map ANLE table to specific FI line item?
Thanks!
JheroHello Alok,
You can find info from PO -> QUOT -> BIDINV via SRC_GUID field which has original item GUID. Try following function module.
1. FM BBP_PD_PO_GETDETAIL
E_ITEM-SRC_GUID <- Get QUIT item GUID
2. BBP_PD_QUOT_ITEM_GETDETAIL
ES_ITEM-SRC_GUID <- Get BIDINV item GUID
3. BBP_PD_BID_ITEM_GETDETAIL
ES_ITEM <- Get BIDINV item information.
Regards,
Masa -
Hi,
Trying to explain my scenario and asking you guys if you see feasibly to get this:
We have several types of documents posted in the same period in a specific WBS. One is posted in a investment GL account and the others in expense GLs. We want to settle them in the same period with different features and according two different settlement parameters:
- Investment posting needs to be settled against a Fixed Asset. for this we can set the Settlement rule FXA and in the settlement parameters, we have specific parameters. One of them is the the PA transfer structure empty in order to get a financial document for the settlement.
- GLs posting needs to be settled against Profitability segment. We set the Settlement rule PSG. Also we set the Settlement parameters like a specific PA transfer structure in order to get the receiver PA segment arrives to a specific line of the P&L account. There is a line for the expenses in the WBS elements.
The settlement parameters are at WBS level not at settlement rule level so each time I try to make a settlement by CJ88 the system is taking both settlement rules. I also tried making a settlement with only one rule and them changing the parameters but the settlement takes the whole amount imputed in the period in each settlement.
Do you anyone know a way to get my requirement?
Many thanks in advance and Kind RegardsHi,
Yes I agree, if you maintain two settlement rule on a WBS with different settlement receiver and if you do CJ88 then system will take both settlement rule one by one at same transaction time.
But
Jorge Lacueva wrote:
I also tried making a settlement with only one rule and them changing the parameters but the settlement takes the whole amount imputed in the period in each settlement.
I think you haven't maintained your required settlement amount in settlement rule. Whole amount will be taken only if you give 100% or total amount in settlement rule. But there is option for changing the value say 50% or some amount say 100.00. Do the same and reply.
Regards
Shishir -
Procument through Internal Order
Hi
We got few real internal orders (overhead) where it got a budget value and a settlement rule to be settled to a cost center
When raising PO, we use F (Internal Order) as the account assignment adn the double entry is passed to debiting as asset account and crediting GRIR account. But during month ends when the internal orders are settled, it does not settle because its a balance sheet account. Account assignment A is used because we wanted the asset to be assertized at the time of procument
What I need to know is that the process that we have use is correct or not.?? Is it correct to use an internal order at the time of the PO OR do we need to use a WBS at the time of the PO
Following account assignment categories are used
A (Asset), F (Internal Order), Q (WBS)
Thanks
TrishanHi,
You are trying to control the budget through the Internal Order and at the same time capitalize (create the Asset) during the GR posting. Then why the Internal Order is having a settlement rule for settling to Cost Center?
Create the PO with account assignment to Internal Order (Posting to a Cost Element and not a Balance Sheet Account). Then during the month-end, the IO should be settled to FXA (Fixed Asset). The settlement rule of the IO should point to FXA and not Cost Center. WBS can also be used instead of these real Internal Orders.
Thanks, -
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
Hi,
While settling the AUC internal order,i am gettingg the below error.Kindly advice me
Define a settlement cost element for receiver type FXA
Message no. KD506
Diagnosis
In allocation structure A1 (controlling area AFCO), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type FXA.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure A1.
Thanks
SupriyaHi Supriya,
Go to SPRO-> Controlling > Internal orders>Actual postings>Settlement> Maintain Allocation structures & choose A1 and go to assignment, select the relevant category like raw material / consumption and then go to source, check the range of cost elements first then click the settlement cos t element and under that choose FXA and define the settlement cost element which must be created under 22 category.
After maintainig the above, you will not get the error anymore.
Thanks & Regards
Anuj Agarwal -
Unable to assign AUC as settlement type in settlement rule for FXA category
Dear Experts,
One of my requirement is that one WBS has several actual posting for AUC of different types and settle through CJ88. Investment profile is not in scope.
To run the above scenario, i created AUC manually via AS01 of different types. When i create settlement rule manually for that WBS i can't see the settlement type "AUC" for FXA category. I can see only the settlement type of "PER and FULL". 100% settlement should be done for all AUC posted for that WBS at the time of each period closing.
Could you help me to resolve this issue asap?
Regards
VetriHi,
To get AUC in settlement rule , you need to allow settlement at wbs level which use to be controlled in settlement profile. Also you wont find AUC but u will find fixed asset- FXA.
One more thing settlement rule come automatically when you run the settlement first time as captilisation. You will get the settlement rule automatically.
Regards
Abhishek Sinha
Maybe you are looking for
-
Sharepoint 2007 Workflow not sending out task emails.
Im currently having an issue with our sharpoint 2007 farm. This is currenlty affecting all site collections in the farm. I have been troubleshooting this for this without any luck. The workflow get created and the person who created the workflow reci
-
What is the best way to send auto mail with excel(generated by query) attachment?
Hello, Need to generate first data from stored procedure and the save it to an excel file and then send mail with the same excel file. So am searching for the best way so that i could do all process in a single task with daily or monthly schedule. As
-
Relative Paths In DSN-less JDBC URL
Whenever I've seen DSN-less URL strings for M$ Access, they've always used an absolute path to the database file: String url="jdbc:odbc:DRIVER={Microsoft Access Driver (*.mdb)};DBQ=c:\\full\\path\\src\\data\\FirstLotParts.mdb";Has anyone tried to giv
-
Hi, I purchased an iPod Nano for my finacee for Xmas. She has just called me to say she thinks it has broken. The iPod is playing music. However, the screen appears to have broken, as all she sees is the backlight come on and dim as it usually would,
-
Do I need to get all new hardware to enjoy the benefits of new Airport Extreme 802.11ac protocol?