Settling WBS Element

When settling WBS in CJ88, I get the error "No area exists for cost accounting valuation". Do we need to maintain depreciation area for AUC's also. If so, then I tried maintaining a depreciation area and still getting this error. Has anyone come across this error.

Refer SAP
Note 193210 - Settlement to asset: AW217, F5703, RW022 etc
Note 397799 - INFORMATION: CO-OM-OPA (Order & Project Accounting)
Note 860484 - Investment measure: Error messages AY310, AW217
Regards,
Ravi

Similar Messages

  • Change of Source Structure for Partial Settled WBS elements - CJ02

    Hi
    As per standard SAP, the change of source structure under settlement perameters of WBS element is not supported when the settlement of WBS element is done either partial / full.
    However, the client needs this change by doing any Z-Development as one time activity (since the source structure was changed for certain WBS elements as per change in business process).
    Can i Know procedure to do the Z development to modify the source structure for partial settled WBS elements and also let me know the any side effects in this regard.
    Regards
    Anil

    Hi Anil,
    I agree with Ajay. You can try to change it in Debugging mode.
    The values are handed over from include LCJWBF5Q (form project_settle_single using)      
    Some customer have also made a modification as a permanent solution.    
    Unfortunately in the standard it is not possible.
    regards Bernhard

  • Unable to Settle WBS element- Message No. KD559..

    Hi,
    I am trying to settle a WBS element. I have maintained the settlement rule through CJIC.
    Now when I am trying to settle it through CJ88 I get a message:
    Message no. KD559
    Diagnosis
    You are trying to use a settlement amount rule to settle an amount larger than the amount currently available.
    Note that it is not appropriate to assign several line items to the same distribution rule group if you wish to settle line items. The system..
    uses the distribution rule group for each line item,
    meaning that the total settled amount would be the same as the total of the amounts from the distribution rules,
    multiplied by the number of line items.
    System Response
    The system does not allow the settlement.
    Procedure
    Check your settlement rules.
    I had gone through the details I found that this is due to a negative amount maintained in the settlement rule for one receiver. I want this negative amount in the settlement rule. (The total amount of settlement rule equals the postings to the WBS)
    My question stands what should I do so that it will be possible for me to settle the WBS element.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Prasad
    Edited by: Prasad Wathare on Apr 12, 2011 2:03 PM

    Hi Medha,
    Due to Month End Activity I have changed the rule and tried to settle and it worked, but I will be glad to know the reason why this happens?
    Thanks i advance.
    Regards,
    Prasad A. Wathare.

  • Settlement of WBS element down payments to an asset under constructions

    The down payment (of the transactions tcode F-47 and tcode F-110), are
    always settlement wbs element (tcode CJ88), we do not want to post down
    payments to the receiving asset under construction (transaction type
    180 or 181).
    In the down payments are always taken into account in the settlement to
    an asset. The settlement of the down payment is the actual reason for
    the previous update of down payments in FI (Transaction type group
    15). Furthermore, the settlement of down payments to assets should
    not be capitalize.

    When you search on this forum try to put Date range "ALL" to get more results. Please read below threads and you will get the solution.
    MIRO:Transaction in area 15 contradicts the net book value rule
    Transaction in area 01 contradicts the NBV
    Looks like you have a negative balance in your WBS which you are trying to settle to FA.

  • Settlement fo Wbs element to Copa

    Hi All,
    Iam new to project systems concept. In month end when we settle wbs element to copa.data will flow into F!, profit center and copa, during the settlement to copa
    I want to know what journal entries it will reflect in FI,Profit center and Copa.
    Regards,
    Chandu

    Dear,
             For customer project you should run the result anlaysis and this result anlaysis data you can settle to the COPA.
                                 Then the settled data send to the value field which is given to the PA transfer strature in Settlement profile.
                                              The profit center is debited and credited .
                                               One controlling document is also generated which have cost reduced from WBS element to profibility segement.
    Regards.

  • Settlement rule in WBS element

    Hi Team
    we are assigning General ledger accounts for settlement WBS element cost. system gives the below warning message. but we have three company codes we fallow the same steps for all company codes. but we are facing in one company code only why it happen. warning message like below
    Total = 200.00%, ( Set.Type FUL / Version / Actual settlement ), period 009/2009, source assignment COE
    Message no. KD041

    we are selecting settlement catogiry G/L
    Settlement receiver G/L Number
    % = 100
    settlement is = Ful
    no = 1 ....10
    we are transfering the total amount to 10 g/l like above that time we are facing the problem.

  • WBS element in Asset master & investment order

    hi,
    till now we are using the capital investment order for capitalising assets, but now the client is asking for settling wbs element on to auc, can we have both WBS elment and investment order for a single asset. does any one have img document for wbs element related config.

    Hi Sai,
    I think I can answer part of your question.  If a posting is being made to wbs element and internal order (both are real).  The real posting goes to wbs element and statistical posting goes to internal order.
    In this case, you will be settling the wbs element to the AUC rather than Internal Order.
    Coming to the configuration, most of the configuration settings are same on Internal Orders / WBS elements.
    I am sorry, I do not have any documentation.
    Regards,
    Sreeni

  • WBS Element wise settlement report

    I require a report having the all WBS element code with settlement rule details the input shall be Project Deffinition. The report can be a standard report or from database table. Please suggest.
    I have already tried in the Table COBRB & COBRA. But it is not giving the suitable report.
    With regards,
    Uttam Maity
    Edited by: Uttam Maity on Aug 9, 2011 2:36 PM

    There is a standard report available in ECC 6.0 EHP4, KOSRLIST_PR. menu path Logistics - Project System - Financials -
    Period End Closing - Single functions - Settlement Rule - KOSRLIST_PR - List. You can create your own variant with inputs like project definition no, network number you can also choose a variant from list and then execute the report.

  • Travel Expenses settlements against Service Order/WBS Element/Project Ord

    Hi Experts,
    I have one req. in Travel Expenses, i.e. need to settle travel expneses against Service Order/WBS Element/Project Order.
    Can you guide me how to do this req.
    Thanks & Regards
    Rajesh

    Hye mate,
    This is possible for sure what you need to do is to go at travel request . In travel Request there is an option of Enhanced Travel cost/ Alternative master cost center. if you click on it . you would find an option of cost assignmnet click on it
    there you would have option , like an excel sheet like fields of  the cost centre, wbs element, profit center, order number what eve is requred and save it.
    now the cot of trip would go that particulat cost center or der numbe or WBS rather then the cost center assigned at master data in ifototype 0027.
    Regards
    Waqas Anwar

  • Settlement of order -WBS Element

    Dear Experts,
    Can any one tell me what is meant by WBS element and in what scenario,PM orders settlement rule created with category as WBS.If possible tell me with any practical example.
    regards
    KRISHNAN

    Dear,
    Dear,
    Budget: Amount of resources allocated under a particular head in a financial year.
    Budget Control: Having/ creating a control on the resources allocated in a financial year.
    Original Budget: The initial budget that you have allocated to a WBS element.
    Supplement of Budget: One time/ discrete increment in the original budget.
    Return of Budget: Taking out the unutilized portion of the budget.
    Transfer of Budget: Transferring the budget among two or more expense heads.
    Project Definition: A framework for a business undertaking with a fixed goal to achieve with given resources.
    The project definition contains dates and organizational information that are binding for the entire project.
    WBS Element: Individual structural element in a work breakdown structure (WBS) representing the hierarchical organization of an R/3 project. Describes either a concrete task or a partial one that can be further subdivided.
    Proposed Business Process
    Assume there are seven expense heads in maintenance department. There may be addition of expense head in near future.
    Based on the maintenance heads, maintenance department will create a project in project system. This project will be used for ‘statistical purpose’ only & will not have any financial implication.
    Upon creation of a project, WBS elements will be created as per the expense heads. So for each expense head, there will be one top level WBS element. Again these WBS elements will be divided in twelve WBS elements. These twelve WBS elements represent twelve calendar months.
    Budget will be allocated to each WBS element & the WBS element will be released from the project.
    Maintenance department will create maintenance orders as per their work requirements. These orders will be settled to cost centre, which is maintained in the settlement rule. Also WBS element will have to be mentioned in each order so that the budget control can take place. So as to capture cost from each maintenance order, the WBS element field will be made ‘mandatory field’ in maintenance order.
    So when a maintenance order is released, system will do a budget check against the WBS element mentioned. If the budget check status is OK, order is released or else it will stopped from release. If the order is stopped from release, maintenance department will have to supplement the budget. Upon supplementing, the order is released again & the maintenance cost such as, labour, material costs can be booked on the order. Again the order cost is settled to cost centre & at the same time, budget is consumed from the respective WBS element.
    Every year, maintenance department will copy the previous year’s project so as to save time & efforts to create project & WBS elements. And the maintenance department will assign the budget allocated to each WBS element in a financial year.
    It is also possible to return the unutilised budget or, transfer of budget from one WBS element to another.
    Create a project CJ20N
    Create WBS element CJ20N
    Assign Budget to WBS elementsKO22
    Display assigned Budget KO23
    Supplement Budget KO24
    Display Supplement budget KO25
    Return Budget KO26
    Display Return budget KO27
    Transfer of budget CJ34
    Hope u wull get ur answer
    Regards
    Rakesh

  • Report on Settlement - Project wise/ WBS element wise

    Hello Friends,
    I am looking for a report on settlement which will include the senders - Projects or WBS elements and Settlement receivers and the amount settled in the any period for a particular fiscal year.
    Your response will be rewarded.
    Vishal.

    Hi,
    Pls refer CJIC and CJID.
    Regards,
    Amit

  • Creation of settlement rules for WBS element

    Hi,
    Iam having problem when creating the settlement rules for WBS elements. The business goes like this.
    We have XI interface which creates the Idocs and an inbound program(customized) to process the Idocs. When the Inbound program is run the WBS elements are created and settlement rules are created for the WBS elements. The inbound program is run automatically thru batch job.
    First time when the Idocs are processed about 95% of the WBS elements have settlement rules created and for other 5% settlement rules are not created. The Idoc is in status 64. I tried reprocessing the Idoc and then the settlement rules are getting created succussfully. The problem is Iam not able to find why the Inbound program is not processing succusfully when its run first time but works when reprocessed.
    I appreciate if anyone can send their views.
    Best Regards
    SK

    Hi!
    You might set the processing to check not only once the relevant IDocs, but more times...
    Check out these programs, and set them into a batch job periodically...
    RBDMANI2
    RBDAPP01
    Regards
    Tamá

  • Assiging wbs element as settlment receiver in service order settlement

    Hi PM CS Experts.
    We are using scenarios of creation of service order from sales order. So whatever cost we incurred for service order settling to sales order via settlement rule - settlment receiver is Sales order i.e. SDI. We are using settlement profie XX which have default object type for settling SDI.   While releasing the service order the settlement rule created with settlement receiver is SDI.
    Now for different business scenarios, we are settling service order cost to WBS. Now we want to create a settlemetn rule for WBS, settlement receiver will be WBS element,  while saving the service order.  What configuration, master data or processes we have to follow for this.
    please reply on this.
    regards
    abhay

    Sales Order line item have account assignment WBS element. From this sales order line, a service order will be created.   So our idea is whatever cost booked to service order should be settled to wbs element instead of sales order.  
    also in location tab of service order, the wbs element from sales order is not inherrited in account assignment section.  Why this we are not knowing. Have you have any idea for this.
    regards
    abhay

  • WBS element settlement to an AUC

    Hi Everyone,
    WBS element is settled to an AUC asset on periodic basis and on completion of the project the AUC is settled to a regular asset; in this process once the project is complete its status is set to technically complete before settling the AUC to regular asset. Now, my question is if there is a requirement to continue the same project as a second phase meaning incurring the costs to the same WBS element which is set as TECO; is that something possible at all i.e,. to post the costs on a WBS that is technically complete? If so, then would it be possible to settle the second phase costs to a new AUC asset and so forth for third and fourth phases of the project.
    Your input in this regard is highly appreciated and will be awarded with points.
    Thanks in advance,
    Kumar

    Hi Abhilasha,
    Thanks a lot for your input. I have one more question; according to your information once WBS status is set to TECO it still can take FI postings in that case would those postings be settled? If so, then could that be a AUC? I know you said a WBS can be settled to only one AUC but, the client here wants to settle it to a new AUC for the second phase of construction of the project. So, settling the WBS to a new AUC is not at all a possibility? Could you please confirm?
    I did not quite understand the point that WBS can take FI Postings after it is set to status TECO, could you please clarify a little bit on that?
    Thanks,
    Kumar

  • CJ20N : Settlement Rules Heritage on unique IeC WBS Element

    Hi Experts,
    I've customize PS for an investment project, who have a stategy for top down heritage of the settlement rules from the project definition, and an automatic generation of an only IeC (on first WBS element) when the entire project is launched from the project definition.
    All settlement rules are settled to the first WBS element (WBS project), who becomes the IeC.
    Heritage is OK on all WBS elements and  I can see them under "Edit -> Costs -> Settlement Rule".
    When I try to see my seetlement rules on the first WBS Element (WBS project), the system turn in loop and dump after 2 minutes (time over message).
    In my opinion, the error comes that the system permiss to affect the settlement rule (for exemple WBS -> I/0001) on his own object (WBS ID I/0001) . They have no error message when I save the project for the heritage.
    After this operation, impossible to go back under "Edit -> Costs -> Settlement Rule" to see the settlement rules of this WBS Element.
    For more information, I don't want the create the heritage to level 2 or 3 of my WBS elements structure, because I don't want to loose a level (coding mask I/XXXX.XXXX.XXX.XXXX).
    Does an expert have a solution to resolv my problem ?
    Thanks in advance for your assistance.

    Hi herieric ,
    The program should not enter into an endlos loop in such case. It is rather a program error than a consulting issue. You can copy the key words from the dumps and search the notes. If there is still no suitable notes, create a customer message and ask SAP for support.
    Kind regards,
    Zhenbo

Maybe you are looking for

  • Ibook G4 display defaults to 800x600 VGA display after 10.4.6 update

    Hi Folks: I just updated (my brand new) ibook G4 from 10.4.5 to 10.4.6 and now the display is recognized as a VGA display only, defaults to 800x600, and lost its brightness controls. This is very strange, since the machine is brand new and the only t

  • Connecting Forms 6i to MS SQL Server

    Dear friends, I am really struggling to solve this connection issue. I am working with forms 6i, oracle 8i, in Windows 2000 professional environment. Developing programs using oracle 8i tables is ok, but I want to connect to SQL Server 2000 and MS Ac

  • Help diagnosing 'The system cannot find the path specified' when running GPMW or GPRW on W2008R2 Std (64-bit) DCs

    Hi, Decided to bite the bullet and sort out a nagging issue we have in our AD where GPMW and GPRW both report errors when run. Some time back we had a PDC failure which a third-party helped us to recover from but suspect there might have been some lo

  • Mandatory /option fields

    Hello I am doing soap to proxy scenario sync. some fields in soap are optional and some are mandatory, when we define option fields in data types ? can the xml tags also be optional or is it just the values within that particular tag which is optiona

  • BUPA_MAIN F05 Bdocs

    Hi Experts, Now a days we are facing SYSFAIL R3AD_CUSTOME* Queues in SMQ2. The Queues are failing in "Error in Mapping; check transaction SMW01" and in SMW01 there are some BUPA_MAIN F05 Bdocs with error text as "A business partner cannot be determin