./setup_install_server failing with ZFS

I recently upgraded my jumpstart server to 10/08 with ZFS boot. My installation media is located under /export/install/media, where /export/install is a ZFS file system (zpool1/install).
I'm trying to add Solaris 9 installation media, but setup_install_client errors as follows:
2009-01-14 12:06:44 # ./setup_install_server /export/install/media/Solaris_9_905hw_sparc
ERROR: zpool1/install is not a local filesystem, cannot export /export/install/media/Solaris_9_905hw_sparc for install clients
2009-01-14 12:06:58 #I assume setup_install_client from older install media isn't smart enough to handle an underlying ZFS file system. Is there some way around this?

You could probably hack setup_install_server to not worry about that check. Or you could just copy of the image directory yourself to the correct location.
Darren

Similar Messages

Live Upgrade fails on cluster node with zfs root zones

We are having issues using Live Upgrade in the following environment:
-UFS root
-ZFS zone root
-Zones are not under cluster control
-System is fully up to date for patching
We also use Live Upgrade with the exact same same system configuration on other nodes except the zones are UFS root and Live Upgrade works fine.
Here is the output of a Live Upgrade:
bash-3.2# lucreate -n sol10-20110505 -m /:/dev/md/dsk/d302:ufs,mirror -m /:/dev/md/dsk/d320:detach,attach,preserve -m /var:/dev/md/dsk/d303:ufs,mirror -m /var:/dev/md/dsk/d323:detach,attach,preserve
Determining types of file systems supported
Validating file system requests
The device name </dev/md/dsk/d302> expands to device path </dev/md/dsk/d302>
The device name </dev/md/dsk/d303> expands to device path </dev/md/dsk/d303>
Preparing logical storage devices
Preparing physical storage devices
Configuring physical storage devices
Configuring logical storage devices
Analyzing system configuration.
Comparing source boot environment <sol10> file systems with the file
system(s) you specified for the new boot environment. Determining which
file systems should be in the new boot environment.
Updating boot environment description database on all BEs.
Updating system configuration files.
The device </dev/dsk/c0t1d0s0> is not a root device for any boot environment; cannot get BE ID.
Creating configuration for boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Source boot environment is <sol10>.
Creating boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Creating file systems on boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Preserving <ufs> file system for </> on </dev/md/dsk/d302>.
Preserving <ufs> file system for </var> on </dev/md/dsk/d303>.
Mounting file systems for boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Calculating required sizes of file systems for boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Populating file systems on boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Checking selection integrity.
Integrity check OK.
Preserving contents of mount point </>.
Preserving contents of mount point </var>.
Copying file systems that have not been preserved.
Creating shared file system mount points.
Creating snapshot for <data/zones/img1> on <data/zones/img1@sol10-20110505>.
Creating clone for <data/zones/img1@sol10-20110505> on <data/zones/img1-sol10-20110505>.
Creating snapshot for <data/zones/jdb3> on <data/zones/jdb3@sol10-20110505>.
Creating clone for <data/zones/jdb3@sol10-20110505> on <data/zones/jdb3-sol10-20110505>.
Creating snapshot for <data/zones/posdb5> on <data/zones/posdb5@sol10-20110505>.
Creating clone for <data/zones/posdb5@sol10-20110505> on <data/zones/posdb5-sol10-20110505>.
Creating snapshot for <data/zones/geodb3> on <data/zones/geodb3@sol10-20110505>.
Creating clone for <data/zones/geodb3@sol10-20110505> on <data/zones/geodb3-sol10-20110505>.
Creating snapshot for <data/zones/dbs9> on <data/zones/dbs9@sol10-20110505>.
Creating clone for <data/zones/dbs9@sol10-20110505> on <data/zones/dbs9-sol10-20110505>.
Creating snapshot for <data/zones/dbs17> on <data/zones/dbs17@sol10-20110505>.
Creating clone for <data/zones/dbs17@sol10-20110505> on <data/zones/dbs17-sol10-20110505>.
WARNING: The file </tmp/.liveupgrade.4474.7726/.lucopy.errors> contains a
list of <2> potential problems (issues) that were encountered while
populating boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
INFORMATION: You must review the issues listed in
</tmp/.liveupgrade.4474.7726/.lucopy.errors> and determine if any must be
resolved. In general, you can ignore warnings about files that were
skipped because they did not exist or could not be opened. You cannot
ignore errors such as directories or files that could not be created, or
file systems running out of disk space. You must manually resolve any such
problems before you activate boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Creating compare databases for boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Creating compare database for file system </var>.
Creating compare database for file system </>.
Updating compare databases on boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Making boot environment <sol10-20110505> bootable.
ERROR: unable to mount zones:
WARNING: zone jdb3 is installed, but its zonepath /.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt/zoneroot/jdb3-sol10-20110505 does not exist.
WARNING: zone posdb5 is installed, but its zonepath /.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt/zoneroot/posdb5-sol10-20110505 does not exist.
WARNING: zone geodb3 is installed, but its zonepath /.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt/zoneroot/geodb3-sol10-20110505 does not exist.
WARNING: zone dbs9 is installed, but its zonepath /.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt/zoneroot/dbs9-sol10-20110505 does not exist.
WARNING: zone dbs17 is installed, but its zonepath /.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt/zoneroot/dbs17-sol10-20110505 does not exist.
zoneadm: zone 'img1': "/usr/lib/fs/lofs/mount /.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt/global/backups/backups/img1 /.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt/zoneroot/img1-sol10-20110505/lu/a/backups" failed with exit code 111
zoneadm: zone 'img1': call to zoneadmd failed
ERROR: unable to mount zone <img1> in </.alt.tmp.b-tWc.mnt>
ERROR: unmounting partially mounted boot environment file systems
ERROR: cannot mount boot environment by icf file </etc/lu/ICF.2>
ERROR: Unable to remount ABE <sol10-20110505>: cannot make ABE bootable
ERROR: no boot environment is mounted on root device </dev/md/dsk/d302>
Making the ABE <sol10-20110505> bootable FAILED.
ERROR: Unable to make boot environment <sol10-20110505> bootable.
ERROR: Unable to populate file systems on boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
ERROR: Cannot make file systems for boot environment <sol10-20110505>.
Any ideas why it can't mount that "backups" lofs filesystem into /.alt? I am going to try and remove the lofs from the zone configuration and try again. But if that works I still need to find a way to use LOFS filesystems in the zones while using Live Upgrade
Thanks

I was able to successfully do a Live Upgrade with Zones with a ZFS root in Solaris 10 update 9.
When attempting to do a "lumount s10u9c33zfs", it gave the following error:
ERROR: unable to mount zones:
zoneadm: zone 'edd313': "/usr/lib/fs/lofs/mount -o rw,nodevices /.alt.s10u9c33zfs/global/ora_export/stage /zonepool/edd313 -s10u9c33zfs/lu/a/u04" failed with exit code 111
zoneadm: zone 'edd313': call to zoneadmd failed
ERROR: unable to mount zone <edd313> in </.alt.s10u9c33zfs>
ERROR: unmounting partially mounted boot environment file systems
ERROR: No such file or directory: error unmounting <rpool1/ROOT/s10u9c33zfs>
ERROR: cannot mount boot environment by name <s10u9c33zfs>
The solution in this case was:
zonecfg -z edd313
info ;# display current setting
remove fs dir=/u05 ;#remove filesystem linked to a "/global/" filesystem in the GLOBAL zone
verify ;# check change
commit ;# commit change
exit

Importing Virtualbox VM into pool fails with any errors VDI 3.0

I'm at the last stage of importing my VM's into mypool which I created and the importing fails with Job failed. I do not have large space /var/tmp and have setup a link to the VM's
FINER: THROW
com.sun.vda.service.api.ServiceException: File copy failed for server 192.168.0.25.
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.Storage.copyFileToVolume(Storage.java:396)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktopProvider.importImage(VBDesktopProvider.java:1300)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.VBDesktopProvider.newDesktopInstance(VBDesktopProvider.java:225)
at com.sun.vda.service.core.jobs.ImportJob.runJob(ImportJob.java:49)
at com.sun.vda.service.core.jobs.Job.run(Job.java:122)
at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:417)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:269)
at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:123)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:650)
at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:675)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:595)
Caused by: java.io.FileNotFoundException: (No such file or directory)
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.open(Native Method)
at java.io.RandomAccessFile.<init>(RandomAccessFile.java:212)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.Storage.copy(Storage.java:773)
at com.sun.vda.service.vbox.Storage.copyFileToVolume(Storage.java:386)
... 10 more
Apr 4, 2009 1:40:15 PM com.sun.vda.service.persistence.PersistentJob commit

Thomas,
Thanks for your reply. I have finished the VDI 3.0 Install and everything works fine now. For some reason even though the Storage OS was opensolaris 2008.11 but running on a VM it did not like that and once I dedicated a seperate box, then things worked fine. I just redid the install of the VM to try if it goes through and this time it works well. So my setup as of now has everything running on a ASUS MBD whitebox with Open Solaris running as a VM in Virtual Box and acting as a ZFS Storage (Virtualbox is running inside the GA release. However I would like to run everything in one OS which would be the GA. I tried setting up the iSCSI interface in GA and it did not work. Any ideas on how I can make this work on just one platform ?

Can't boot with zfs root - Solaris 10 u6

Having installed Solaris 10 u6 on one disk with native ufs and made this work by adding the the following entries
/etc/driver_aliases
glm pci1000,f
/etc/path_to_inst
<lang pci string for my scsi controller> glm
which are needed since the driver selected by default are the ncsr scsi controller driver that do not work in 64 bit.
Now I would like to create a new boot env. on a second disk on the same scsi controller, but use zfs instead.
Using Live Upgrade to create a new boot env on the second disk with zfs as file system worked fine.
But when trying to boot of it I get the following error
spa_import_rootpool: error 22
panic[cpu0]/thread=fffffffffbc26ba0: cannot mount root path /pci@0,0-pci1002,4384@14,4/pci1000@1000@5/sd@1,0:a
Well that's the same error I got with ufs before making the above mentioned changes /etc/driver_aliases and path_to_install
But that seems not to be enough when using zfs.
What am I missing ??

Hmm I dropped the live upgrade from ufs to zfs because I was not 100% sure it worked.
Then I did a reinstall selecting to use zfs during the install and made the changes to driver_aliases and path_to_inst before the 1'st reboot.
The system came up fine on the 1'st reboot and did use the glm scsi driver and running in 64bit.
But that was it. When the system then was rebooted (where it made a new boot-archive) it stopped working. Same error as before.
I have managed to get it to boot in 32bit mode but still the same error (thats independent of what scsi driver used.)
In all cases it does pop the SunOS Relase banner and it do load the driver (ncrs or glm) and detects the disks in the correct path and numbering.
But it fails to load the file system.
So basically the current status are no-go if you need to use the ncrs/glm scsi driver to access the disks with your zfs root pool.
File-Safe works and can mount the zfs root pool, but that's no fun as server OS :(

EBS 7.4 with ZFS and Zones

The EBS 7.4 product claims to support ZFS and zones, yet it fails to explain how to recover systems running this type of configuration.
Has anyone out there been able to recover a server using the EBS software, that is running with ZFS file systems both in the Global zone and sub zones (NB: The servers system file store / /usr /var, is UFS for all zones).
Edited by: neilnewman on Apr 3, 2008 6:42 AM

The EBS 7.4 product claims to support ZFS and zones, yet it fails to explain how to recover systems running this type of configuration.
Has anyone out there been able to recover a server using the EBS software, that is running with ZFS file systems both in the Global zone and sub zones (NB: The servers system file store / /usr /var, is UFS for all zones).
Edited by: neilnewman on Apr 3, 2008 6:42 AM

ZFS iscsi share failing after ZFS storage reboot

Hello,
ZFS with VDI 3.2.1 works fine until i reboot the ZFS server.
After the ZFS server reboot, the desktop providers are not able to access the virtual disks via iscsi.
This is what is see when listing the targets:
Target: vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3
iSCSI Name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:e5012bea-487c-40ff-81d5-af89405c7121
Alias: vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3
Connections: 0
ACL list:
TPGT list:
LUN information:
LUN: 0
GUID: 600144f04cf383010000144f201a2c00
VID: SUN
PID: SOLARIS
Type: disk
Size: 20G
Backing store: /dev/zvol/rdsk/vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3
Status: No such file or directory
zfs list -Hrt volume vdi | grep d711b8c1a1d3
vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3 0 774G 8.69G -
The vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3 was cloned from a template prior to the reboot.
The workaround is to delete and re-create all pools after the ZFS server reboot.
I use the VDI broker as the ZFS server which mounts an iscsi volume from a Linux box. The following shows an error in sharing a ZFS snaphoot via iscsi after a reboot. Not sure why. The same seems to happen with zfs clone as shown above.
vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460 114M 765G 114M -
vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460@version1 0 - 114M -
zfs set shareiscsi=off vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460
zfs set shareiscsi=on vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460
cannot share 'vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460@version1': iscsitgtd failed request to share
I'm a bit desparate as i cannot find a solution. VDI 3.2.1 is really good but the above behaviour in deleting and re-creating vdi pools after reboots is not sustainable.
Thanks
Thierry.

Hello,
ZFS with VDI 3.2.1 works fine until i reboot the ZFS server.
After the ZFS server reboot, the desktop providers are not able to access the virtual disks via iscsi.
This is what is see when listing the targets:
Target: vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3
iSCSI Name: iqn.1986-03.com.sun:02:e5012bea-487c-40ff-81d5-af89405c7121
Alias: vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3
Connections: 0
ACL list:
TPGT list:
LUN information:
LUN: 0
GUID: 600144f04cf383010000144f201a2c00
VID: SUN
PID: SOLARIS
Type: disk
Size: 20G
Backing store: /dev/zvol/rdsk/vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3
Status: No such file or directory
zfs list -Hrt volume vdi | grep d711b8c1a1d3
vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3 0 774G 8.69G -
The vdi/0fe93683-91ca-4faf-a4db-d711b8c1a1d3 was cloned from a template prior to the reboot.
The workaround is to delete and re-create all pools after the ZFS server reboot.
I use the VDI broker as the ZFS server which mounts an iscsi volume from a Linux box. The following shows an error in sharing a ZFS snaphoot via iscsi after a reboot. Not sure why. The same seems to happen with zfs clone as shown above.
vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460 114M 765G 114M -
vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460@version1 0 - 114M -
zfs set shareiscsi=off vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460
zfs set shareiscsi=on vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460
cannot share 'vdi/ad03deb8-214f-4b8a-bd51-8dc8f819c460@version1': iscsitgtd failed request to share
I'm a bit desparate as i cannot find a solution. VDI 3.2.1 is really good but the above behaviour in deleting and re-creating vdi pools after reboots is not sustainable.
Thanks
Thierry.

Jabber call to voice mail fails with fast busy over VPN

I have an issue that I ran into with CIPC phones over a VPN. If a CIPC phone called over a VPN and started ringing a phone the call would fail with fast busy at the time the call would be forwarded to voicemail. I found the issue was when remote the CIPC phone would negotiate the g.729 codec, when forwarded to a voicemail pilot over a SIP trunk set to g.711 the call would fail due to codec missmatch when no transcoders are present.
So now I am running into what I believe to be the same issue with Jabber, when on premise the calls to voice mail work just fine, but when remote they fail. I can directly call the voicemail pilot without error, but if calling a phone the call gets fast busy at the point we are forwarded to voicemail. Even though all my regions are set to talk to all other regions on G.711 and the voicemail SIP trunk is set to G.711, I believe with the new features in CUCM9 that a lower speed codec has been negotiated since the we are going over the VPN, or Jabber has done this as it knows it's over VPN (not sure). WIth CIPC I could go into the settings and turn off the Optimize for Bandwidth check box and the call would negotiate G.711. With Jabber I can't find anything that would tell my Jabber client to stay on G.711 and I can only imagine this is a codec missmatch as the following are true.
1. CIPC and Jabber share the same line
2. VPN established and CIPC optimised for low bandwidth un-checked
3. Over the same VPN the CIPC phone can leave a voicemail
4. Over the same VPN the Jabber client gets fast busy once forwarded to voicemail
5. Voicemail environment is Exchange-UM over SIP trunk
6. SIP trunk is assigned a Device Pool, that is assigned to a region that all other regions communicate G.711 to
7. On CIPC if optimised for low bandwidth is checked I get the exact same issue as I get with the Jabber client (fast busy when forwarded to voicemail)
Would anyone know what I can do in CUCM 9 to fix this issue, as said no issue when all devices are on premise. Wondering if there is a service parameter or a way to change the codec selection so the Jabber client attempts to always negotiate G.711. The correct answer would be to get some PVDM DSP resources and kick up a transcoder in my resource group, and that may be what I talk them into doing if I have no other options.

We have been getting the exact same thing for almost a year now... since switching to FiOS Digital Voice in May of last year! Every time I call in to report it they 'escalate' the issue but it never gets resolved. The problem seems to be in the initial connection. Most of the time it works fine but, several times a month, after I call to get messages and it starts to play the new message it goes dead and I get the busy signal. I get the same message when I call back: “I’m sorry – that account is in use at this time. Please try again later!” I have even called in with my cell phone and get the same message! I HAVE EVEN used the Internet to see if I could get my messages and, when I hit Play, I get a pop-up saying: “Your Voice Mail box is currently in being accessed; please try again later. If the problem continues, please contact our Customer Support Center at 1-888-553-1555. We apologize for any inconvenience.” This is obviously a software bug that Verizon has no clue on how to troubleshoot OR fix!!! I wonder how many people have the problem and just don’t bother reporting it because of the hassle? When it first started happening they destroyed my entire mailbox and I had to re-enter the complete mailbox setup again – 3 times!!! NEVER let them talk you into that!!! It’s their problem and they need to fix it!!!!!!! I wish I could go back to the ‘normal’ voicemail we originally had… they want hundred$ to switch back because I’d be breaking my #$@%^&* contract! Good luck if you have Verizon………

HT1212 I am unable to get our of a continuous cycle when trying to update or restore my iPad 2. Plug in to iTunes 12.0.1 (latest version). Click update, told can't update, have to restore. Restore fails with error 9. Any help appreciated.

When I tried to update my iPad I got an error 9. Now, I am unable to access my iPad. It is in a continuous cycle when I try to update or restore the iPad 2. Plug in to iTunes 12.0.1 (latest version). Click update, told can't update, have to restore. Restore fails with error 9. Any help appreciated.
Here's the cycle:
I plug in my iPad when “cable to iTunes shows on iPad screen. It says "Your iPad can't be updated, you must restore it to factory settings." That bad enough news, but it gets worse.
Click Restore
Extracting software…
Preparing iPad for restore
Waiting for iPad…
Verifying iPad restore with Apple…
(empty bar under the Apple logo…does not show any activity)
“The iPad “iPad” could not be restored. An unknown error occurred (9).”
Notes: I just upgraded to OS X Yosemite 10.10.1 on my iMac (27-inch, Mid 2011) in the last week. It’s the first time I’m tried to backup/update my iPad since the iMac update.
I swapped out the USB cable to a new cable and get the same results.
I also unplugged all other USB devices from the iMac and security on my iPad and still get the same results.
I find it strange that it shows no Serial number for my my iPad 2 when plugged in. It shows “Serial Number: n/a on the screen when it displays: “iPad Recovery Mode To update your iPad without erasing its contents, click Update. To restore your iPad to its factory settings, click Restore iPad.
I prefer to update my iPad, but it displays “Your iPad can’t be updated, you must restore it to factory settings. If you previously backed up the iPad, click Restore Backup after the restore process completes.”
It’s a continuous loop. I get the display on my iPad to plug in the iPad to iTunes, plug it in which ends after going through the above procedure saying an error occurred (9).
So now I cannot use my iPad. When I turn it on I get the display showing me to plug it into iTunes with the cable. Since this is the only option I have I plug it in and the loop begins.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks!

Hello jaybearden,
Thanks for the question. After reviewing your post, it sounds like you are not able to restore the iOS device since you get an error 9. I would recommend that you read this article, it may be able to help the issue.
Resolve iOS update and restore errors - Apple Support
Check your security software
Related errors: 2, 4, 6, 9, 1000, 1611, 9006. Sometimes security software can prevent your device from communicating with either the Apple update server or with your device.
Check your security software and settings to make sure that they aren't preventing a connection to the Apple servers.
Thanks for using Apple Support Communities.
Have a nice day,
Mario

Installation of Photoshop update 13.1.2 for creative cloud fails with error code U44M1P7 I need help

I need help installing update 13.1.2 for Photoshop creative cloud, installation fails with error code: U44M1P7. Could someone please help?

Sorry to bother you.
I could find the answer after searching previous posts about this language problem.
Had to change my language in AAM profile and then download PS CS6 again ( english version ).
Then open the actual Photoshop and in preferences > interface you can besides the Dutch also option for English.
restart application and Voila.
Greetz, Jeroen

COncurrent process fails with warning for OPP

Concurrent process generates xml output (version 5.6.2) .
When it tries to publish it , the log suggests checking out the OPP log.
The OPP log has a series of java entries for the request, including one of the type
Caused by: oracle.xdo.parser.v2.XPathException: Expected 'QNAME' instead of ''.
header of the OPP log says
Resolution History
18-OCT-06 20:36:05 GMT
Can you easily recover from, bypass or work around the problem? = NO
Does your system or application continue normally after the problem occurs? =
YES
Are the standard features of the system or application still available; is the
loss of service minor? = YES
### Informational Only:Warning Presented to Customer ###
You chose 'Other technical issues with this product' from the Type of Problem
list. This is a generic Service Request form which will require additional time
to be routed appropriately. You may be able to expedite the resolution of your
Service Request by doing the following: 1. Use your browser’s back button to
return to the Create a SR – Brief Description page. 2. Select an option from
the Type of Problem list that more closely describes the problem.
### Requested files:ACT(Note 183274.1),RDA (Note 175853.1). Files to be loaded.
None
### Detailed Problem Statement ###
Concurrent process for XML Publisher fails with warning. Cannot see Diagnostics
--> XML output completely. Only first page visible. Buttons and Menu items
disabled not allowing to view the whole XML file to troubleshoot for
correct/incorrect tags.
Attached are OPP Manager log file, Screen shot of 'Preview' output jjst before
submitting request. Also log file of failed concurrent request which contains
standard error " See OPP Service log file for more".
### Steps to Reproduce Problem ###
Registered a concurrent process with XML template , and running the process
from Receivables Manager responsibility.
Ran concurrent process for 1) Standard RAXINV report , with output method as
'XML'. 2) Customised RAXINV report, with output method as 'XML'
### Instance Name(s) and Type of System(s) Where Error Occurs ###
Lunix, 11.5.10 on 10g
### Recent Changes to this Environment ###
None
### Workarounds Used ###
None
### How is this Issue Impacting Your Business ###
Business is readying for CRP3, so would like to have reports ready by then.
Contact me via : MetaLink
18-OCT-06 20:48:07 GMT
The customer : [email protected] : has uploaded the following file via MetaLink:
C:\Documents_and_Settings\broy\BareEscentuals\Reports\Errors\XML_Pub1.bmp
18-OCT-06 20:49:14 GMT
The customer : [email protected] : has uploaded the following file via MetaLink:
C:\Documents_and_Settings\broy\BareEscentuals\Reports\Errors\XMLPublisher_java.t
xt
18-OCT-06 21:17:26 GMT
Hi Bashobi,
Thank you for using MetaLink. We are currently reviewing/researching the situation and will update the SR as soon as we have relevant information
Best Regards,
Bill
Oracle Support Services
STATUS
=======
@WIP -- Work In Progress
18-OCT-06 21:18:04 GMT
Email Update button has been pressed: Sending email to [email protected].
18-OCT-06 21:21:45 GMT
ISSUE CLARIFICATION
====================
On 11.5.10.2 in Production:
Find concurrent process for XML Publisher fails with warning. Cannot see Diagnostics
--> XML output completely. Only first page visible. Buttons and Menu items
disabled not allowing to view the whole XML file to troubleshoot for
correct/incorrect tags.
EXPECTED BEHAVIOR
Expect the processes run successfully
STEPS
The issue can be reproduced at will with the following steps:
1. Registered a concurrent process with XML template .
2. Run the process from Receivables Manager responsibility.
3. Ran concurrent process for
1) Standard RAXINV report , with output method as 'XML'
2) Customised RAXINV report, with output method as 'XML'
BUSINESS IMPACT
The issue has the following business impact:
Business is readying for CRP3, so would like to have reports ready by then.
ACTION PLAN
============
Hi Bashobi,
1. Can you reproduce the issue from sysadmin responsibility with Active users report? if yes
please upload OPP log file after reproduce it and upload the request log file.
Thanks.
18-OCT-06 23:09:02 GMT
New info : [email protected] : Did the same as suggested, Request
completes successfully.
But what is the relation between Active Users report and a report sent via XML
Publisher?
19-OCT-06 15:54:26 GMT
ACTION PLAN
============
Hi Bashobi,
1. When you reproduce the issue from sysadmin responsibility with Active users report change the format out put to XML,
Save your change:
2. Upload OPP manager log file and upload the request log file.
Thanks,
Bill.
19-OCT-06 15:54:33 GMT
Email Update button has been pressed: Sending email to [email protected].
19-OCT-06 16:42:23 GMT
New info : [email protected] : Bill,
No, I could not reproduce the problem with Active Users program.
Attaching OPP manager log in the next update. Bashobi
19-OCT-06 17:05:07 GMT
New info : [email protected] : Bill, Attaching internal log and manager
log
Bashobi
19-OCT-06 17:06:08 GMT
The customer : [email protected] : has uploaded the following file via MetaLink:
C:\Documents_and_Settings\broy\BareEscentuals\Reports\Errors\OPP_internal_log.tx
t
19-OCT-06 17:07:10 GMT
The customer : [email protected] : has uploaded the following file via MetaLink:
C:\Documents_and_Settings\broy\BareEscentuals\Reports\Errors\OPP_manager_log.txt
19-OCT-06 18:14:32 GMT
UPDATE
=======
Hi Bashobi,
Thank you for providing the requested information.
Best Regards,
Bill
STATUS
=======
@WIP -- Work In Progress
19-OCT-06 18:14:36 GMT
Email Update button has been pressed: Sending email to [email protected].
19-OCT-06 18:59:25 GMT
DATA COLLECTED
===============
SCREEN SHOTS
XML_Pub1.bmp:
Error:
Jave.sql SQL Exception No corresponding LOB data found: select File_data_dbms_lob...........
LOG FILE
1. XMLPublisher_java.txt:
[10/18/06 11:16:57 AM] [5670:RT277479] Completed post-processing actions for request 277479.
[10/18/06 11:29:06 AM] [OPPServiceThread1] Post-processing request 277488.
[10/18/06 11:29:06 AM] [5670:RT277488] Executing post-processing actions for request 2
77488.
[10/18/06 11:29:06 AM] [5670:RT277488] Starting XML Publisher post-processing action.
[10/18/06 11:29:06 AM] [5670:RT277488]
Template code: XXBE_TEST_INV
Template app: AR
Language: en
Territory: US
Output type: null
[10/18/06 11:29:07 AM] [UNEXPECTED] [5670:RT277488] java.lang.reflect.InvocationTarg
etException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
10/18/06 11:29:07 AM] [5670:RT277488] Completed post-processing actions for reque
st 277488.
2. OPP_manager_log.txt:
[10/19/06 5:22:36 AM] [main] Starting GSF service with concurrent process id = 5688.
[10/19/06 5:22:36 AM] [main] Initialization Parameters: oracle.apps.fnd.cp.opp.OPPServiceThread:2:0:max_threads=5
[10/19/06 5:22:37 AM] [Thread-12] Service thread starting up.
[10/19/06 5:22:37 AM] [Thread-13] Service thread starting up.
ISSUE VERIFICATION
=================
Issue veryfied by the screen shots: XML_Pub1.bmp which shows:
Jave.sql SQL Exception No corresponding LOB data found: select File_data_dbms_lob...........
ACTION PLAN
============
Hi Bashobi,
1. Since you can not reproduce the issue from sysadmin responsibility can we say the issue specific to Receivables Manager
responsibility<INV xml report>?
2. You said before: "Concurrent process for XML Publisher fails with warning. Cannot see Diagnostics
--> XML output completely. Only first page visible. Buttons and Menu items
disabled not allowing to view the whole XML file to troubleshoot for
correct/incorrect tags.":
Is the above mean :
-The xml publisher report completed but you can not view the whole XML file
-Or the xml publisher report error out with "Jave.sql SQL Exception No corresponding LOB data found: select File_data_dbms_lob.."
Thanks.
19-OCT-06 18:59:32 GMT
Email Update button has been pressed: Sending email to [email protected].
20-OCT-06 21:36:13 GMT
Email Update button has been pressed: Sending email to [email protected].
24-OCT-06 21:50:06 GMT
New info : [email protected] : Hi,
We are in the process of upgrading XML Publisher at the moment. I would like to
wait a day or two to test the report with the upgrade.
Thanks,Bashobi
26-OCT-06 20:15:07 GMT
New info : [email protected] : Hi,
Our DBA has applied the 5.6.2 patch on our dev instance. My concurrent process
runs to a warning.
The warnings in the OPP manager log file say
Template code: BE_RAXINV
Template app: XXBE
Language: en
Territory: US
Output type: PDF
[10/26/06 12:50:13 PM] [UNEXPECTED] [5849:RT281617]
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
Any idea?

Hi All,
I have ran into the same issue.
"The Output Post-processor is running but has not picked up this request.
Any ideas.
Thanks
Ravi

Forms application fails with SSO PSP

Hi,
I am trying to invoke a forms application from a PSP page, both are configured behind SSO. But when i click the Forms application link it fails with
500 Internal Server Error
oracle.forms.net.ConnectionException at oracle.forms.servlet.FormsServlet.doRequest(Unknown Source) at oracle.forms.servlet.FormsServlet.doGet(Unknown Source) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:740) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:853) at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.invoke(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:824) at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2)].server.http.ServletRequestDispatcher.forwardInternal(ServletRequestDispatcher.java:330) at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2)].server.http.HttpRequestHandler.processRequest(HttpRequestHandler.java:830) at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:224) at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2)].server.http.AJPRequestHandler.run(AJPRequestHandler.java:133) at com.evermind[Oracle Application Server Containers for J2EE 10g (10.1.2.0.2)].util.ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor$MyWorker.run(ReleasableResourcePooledExecutor.java:192) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
We are not able to figure out why this is happenig. We followed all the steps as per metalink document 262686.1, but it also was of no use.
Has anyone solved this problem, pls let us know the fix?
Thanks,
OracleExpert

Hi everyone,
Alright, I solved the problem. It seems like the OID is very very very picky with the formsweb.cfg syntax. Especially with the quotes: don't use them!
For example, I had set the oid_formsid & formsid_group_dn values between double-quotes. Removing them fixed the error.
Here's an RCS output from the modifications.
[[email protected]] server {1008}$ rcsdiff formsweb.cfg
===================================================================
RCS file: RCS/formsweb.cfg,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -r1.10 formsweb.cfg
208c208
< oid_formsid="formsApp_osielle.notarius.com_47F26490FB4311DB8F3BBF0DDB09B635"
oid_formsid=formsApp_osielle.notarius.com_47F26490FB4311DB8F3BBF0DDB09B635214,215c214
< # formsid_group_dn=%GROUP_DN%
< formsid_group_dn="cn=Logical Application Group, orclApplicationCommonName=formsApp_osielle.notarius.com_47F26490FB4311DB8F3BBF0DDB09B635, cn=Forms, cn=Products, cn=OracleContext"
formsid_group_dn=cn=Logical Application Group, orclApplicationCommonName=formsApp_osielle.notarius.com_47F26490FB4311DB8F3BBF0DDB09B635, cn=forms, cn=Products, cn=OracleContextHTH,
David

DAG - Backup failing on 1 DB only with error - The Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer instance ID failed with error code 80070020 when preparing for a backup of database 'DB012'

Hi Board,
i´ve search across the board, technet and symantec sites but did not found a hint about my problem.
we drive a 2 node DAG (Location1-Ex1-mb1
Location2-exc1-mb1), on SP2 RU4 patchlevel with 40 Databases.
Since some time the backup of one - and only one DB - is failing with these events, logged on the Mailboxserver on which the passive DB is hosted.
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeRepl
Date:          28.09.2012 00:37:17
Event ID:      2112
Task Category: Exchange VSS Writer
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:          N/A
Computer:      Location1-Exc1-MB1
Description: The Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer instance 1ab7d204-609a-4aea-b0a7-70afb0db38de failed with error code 80070020 when preparing for a backup of database 'DB012'.
Followed by
Log Name:      Application
Source:        MSExchangeRepl
Date:
01.10.2012 03:33:06
Event ID:      2024
Task Category: Exchange VSS Writer
Level:         Error
Keywords:      Classic
User:
N/A
Computer:      Location1-Exc1-MB1
Description:
The Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer (Instance 42916d80-36c1-4f73-86d0-596d30226349) failed with error 80070020 when preparing for a backup.
The backup Application - Symantec Backup Exec 2010 R3 – states, this error
Snapshot provider error (0xE000FED1): A failure occurred querying the Writer status.
Check the Windows Event Viewer for details.
Writer Name: Exchange Server, Writer ID: {76FE1AC4-15F7-4BCD-987E-8E1ACB462FB7}, Last error: The VSS Writer failed, but the operation can be retried (0x800423f3), State: Stable (1).
Symatec suggests within http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH184095
to restart the MS Exchange Replication Service – BUT the mentioned eventID
8229 isn´t present on any of the both Mailboxservers.
The affected Database is active on Location2-Exc1-Mb1 Server and in an overall healthy state. I found during my research, that below Location2-Exc1-Mb1 Server, there are not removed shadow copies present!
This confuses me, since all Backups are normally taken from the passive copy of a Database.
So my questions to the board are:
* Does anyone is facing similar issues?
* Can someone explain why snapshots are present on the Mailboxserver hosting the Active Database, whilst the errors are logged on the passive one?
-          * Does someone know the conditions, why shadows copies remain and
aren´t removed in a proper manner?
What can cause the circumstance, that only 1 DB is facing such issues?
Any suggestion is welcome!
BR
Markus

Hi Lenora,
I´ve encreases VSS / Exchange Backup Log levels to expert, before starting
those things i´ve all tried now:
- Backup from passive DB (forced within Symantec Backup Exec)
- Backup from active DB (forced within Symantec Backup Exec)
- Backup from passive DB without GRT enabled (forced within Symantec Backup Exec)
- Backup from active DB without GRT enabled(forced within Symantec Backup Exec)
All those attempts failed.
But brought some more details - the backup against the active DB states, that there is still a backup in progress and therefore this backup is cancelled by VSS.
The Solution was, that i´ve needed to restart the Exchange Replication Service on the Mailbox Server hosting the passive DB.
Backups are working again on all DBs!
THX for your replys.
Best regards
Markus

System Update 5.03 install fails with 'wizard was interrupted'

I have a W520 that I have upgraded to Win 8.1. I'm trying to install the System Update utility and InstallShield Wizard fails with:
InstallShield Wizard Completed
The wizard was interrupted before System Update could be completely installed.
Your system has not been modified. To install this program at a later time, please run the installation again.
Click Finish to exit the Wizard.
I've searched for solutions all over the place and come up blank. This usually tells me there is something screwy on my machine or I'm not searching for the right keywords.
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Windows 7x64 - T430s - 2352CTO
There is a log file but it's too big to post.
It can be viewed at https://www.dropbox.com/s/hl420jgyqs8z9oj/tvsuSetup.log?dl=0
The part where it fails is below:
InstallShield 8:08:51: Invoking script function InstallSUService
1: SU service installation failed, please retry the install.
InstallShield 8:08:52: Setup aborted
InstallShield 8:08:52: CallScriptFunctionFromMsiCA() ends
CustomAction InstallSUService returned actual error code 1602 (note this may not be 100% accurate if translation happened inside sandbox)
MSI (s) (E4:78) [08:08:52:146]: NOTE: custom action InstallSUService unexpectedly closed the hInstall handle (type MSIHANDLE) provided to it. The custom action should be fixed to not close that handle.
Action ended 8:08:52: InstallSUService. Return value 2.

ITunes 6.0.1.3 downloads a video 100%, then fails with "An Unknown Error"

I've downloaded several videos from ITMS but the most recent one I've purchased will complete the download process and then fail. I've tried "check for purchases" several times and always get the same result - download the ~200 MB file, then fail when the progress bar is full.
I've tried disabling Grisoft AntiVirus, defragmenting the hard drive, chkdsk for errors (no errors), but I keep getting the same thing every time - about 8 tries):
[Red X graphic]
There was an error downloading your purchased music.
An unknown error occurred (0xFFFE7958).
Use the Check for Purchased Music command in the Advanced menu to try again later.
[OK]
I don't use iTunes for music - just for video downloads.
Any ideas?
dcs

Same problem here!!!
Three times I tried to download the D.Housewives and three times it failed. I did the check the purchased and was able to start again but everytime it got to either 99% or 100% it failed with a error but on the third time it failed I guess it triggered something and it no longer shows as Purchased Music. I contacted Apple and they told me I am out of luck!
Good thing my Ipod is less then 30 days old as it is going back to the store.
Here is their response after taking my $1.99 but no delivering the product!!!
Dear Steve,
Thank you for contacting the iTunes Music Store.
Per our terms of sale, all music/videos purchased from the iTunes Music Store is ineligible for refund. This policy matches our refund policies on open or downloaded software and provides protection for copy written materials.
For more information, please review all the Terms of Sale for the iTunes Music Store at http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/legal/policies.html.

SSTP VPN fails with Error 0x80092013 when certificate is issued by an Enterprise CA

I have spent several days trying to configure an SSTP VPN in an environment with a 2008R2 Enterprise CA server without much luck. I have been using the example found at http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731352(v=ws.10).aspx which
works very well as long as you configure the CA Extensions tab with an http CRL Distribution point that is included in the CRLs and CDP extension of issued certificates and is available to the client prior to VPN connection.
Basically my lab environment is as follows:
Separate 2008R2 domain controller, Single 2008R2 Enterprise CA / RRAS server with one nic. I know the instructions that I mentioned above use an RRAS server with 2 nics but I don't want my RRAS server serving as a router. I have an external hardware firewall
that port forwards port 443 to my single nic in my RRAS server and this entire configuration works fine as long as I am using a standard CA configuration. The RRAS was configured using the custom option and only VPN was chosen. Since my RRAS server is behind
a NAT router, the dns name my external client uses to connect is different than the internal name of my RRAS server.
In the example above, a Windows 2008R2 CA server is configured as a standalone non-enterprise root CA. As long as I stick with a standard CA, I have no problem and everything works.
My problem is that if I configure my Windows Server 2008R2 Enterprise server as an Enterprise Root CA, My Windows 7 client always gets an "Error 0x80092013 The revocation function was unable to check revocation because the revocation server was offline."
I'm not certain, but I think the problem is with the way that I request the certificate for my RRAS server. When I configure a standalone standard root CA and use the web enrollment page and use an Advanced Certificate Request, I get a page that I can use
to fill out the external dns name that I use to connect to SSTP, choose a Server Authentication Certificate, choose to mark keys as exportable and submit my request. Once I install this key in the Certificates (local computer) / Personal / Certificates
store, everything works and my client can connect as long as I have installed the root CA certificate on my client.
When I install my CA as an Enterprise Root CA server, everything changes. I no longer have the same options to install a custom certificate. Instead of getting the same page as I do with a standard CA, I get my choice of Certificate Templates. Prior to this,
I have duplicated the Computer template in the CA authority and configured the subject name to "supply in request" and configured my CA to issue it. I have tried issuing my RRAS SSTP certificate using the web enrollment and I have also tried using the certificates
plugins in mmc to request custom certificates and tried using an alternative subject name, filling out the DNS option with my external dns name.
When it is all said and done, I end up with an RRAS SSTP certificate that has CRL Distribution Points defined as URL=http://www.mywebsite/CertEnroll/myCA.crl and it is available to my client or anyone. I have compared the certificate issued by an Enterprise
CA vs the Standard CA and I find little difference in the two. I also know that I can reach this RRAS SSTP certificate from my client by going to https://myexternaladdress.mydomain.com/sra_{BA195980-CD49-458b-9E23-C84EE0ADCD75}/and
I can view the padlock in IE and view my internal RRAS certificate. The CRL Distribution point looks no different when I have a standard vs an Enterprise CA but my client always fails with the Error 0x80092013 when I have issued the RRAS SSTP certificate
with the Enterprise CA.
I have probably re-setup this lab about 20 times and am getting very familiar with getting it set up quickly and working with the standard CA but I want to use an Enterprise CA environment.
What am I missing? How can I make this work with an Enterprise CA? How can I troubleshoot this?
Thanks,
Rod
Rod Miller

Thanks for your reply. I did read the article and addressed that issue in the first part of my previous post. I don't think that the website where I am hosting my CRL has directory browsing permissions or that I have the ability to set them but the
point of my question was everything works using that same public website when I use a standard CA to create my certificate but does NOT work when I create the certificate using an Enterprise CA.
Rod
Rod Miller

./setup_install_server failing with ZFS

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for