Several instances in one server from test purposes

Hello,
I would like to ask for your experience when dealing with installation of several software packages in one server.
I'm not sure of my host specs (I deal more with software), just that it's an IBM something (I pray for multi processor but lets assume not) with lets assume at least 8 GB of RAM, and I would like to install SAP Netweaver 2004s (PI + EP mainly), CRM 2005 and SRM 5.0.
Do you think this is possible, assuming the maximum number of people logged in at the same time in any of the applications would be 3?

Hi Joao,
You can install several different systems in the same box as long as you manage to configure memory and resourses to feed all those systems requirements. I have seen 4 J2EE engines in the same box and in another ocassion i saw 3 systems sharing a box with 4 Gigs of RAM, so I'm sure you can! Try to configure as less resouses as posible per system.
Hope this help
Juan

Similar Messages

How to install two instance on one server

Dear Guru,
I want to install two instance on one server.
I have installed IDES server ( win 2k3 64 bit with SQL 2005 ECC 6.0)
Drive is
c: 20 GB for os
d: 5 gb swap
e: 5 gb swap
f: 450 GB database.
The same server i want to installed SOLMAN 4.0 with sql 2005.
Please suggest me how to installed without affcting IDES server.
Amol

Hi,
You only have to consider 2 things :
1. SAPTRANSHOST entry in hosts file will be the same for both systems
this mean that both systems will share the same transport directory
Regards,
Wojtek
This is not true. Your SAPTRANSHOST will remain the same, but you can (and should) specify independent trans directories with the DIR_TRANS and and EPS profile parameters to designate where the instance trans files should be located (i.e. /usr/sap/trans_SID). I recommend you make this change in the existing host first, and then clear out the trans directory. Let the 2nd instance install into it and then alter that one too (thereby moving the files to the new /usr/sap/trans_SID2).
Edited by: David Ingersoll on Jan 31, 2008 3:12 PM

MDM 7.1 SP7, Install Several Instances in one database?

Hello,
we are investigating to install MDM 7.1 Sp7 with several instances to separate impact in different repositories, but with one database (oracle). Has someone done this kind of installations? Has it improved stability?
Regards,
Alexander Türk

Hello,
This clearly says, it adds a new, but nothing of multiple instances.
For an MDM environment to work, we require three Servers, Master Data Server(MDS), Import Server(MDIS), Syndication Server(MDIS).
MDIS and MDSS run in conjunction with MDS.
This refers to the multiple instances, but in all it will an single installation across environment.
You will have the basic Development, Quality and production, each will have a different installation.
an extract from help.sap.com site
Support for Installing and Running Multiple MDM Server Components on a Single Machine
Starting from MDM 7.1 SP06, you can install and run multiple MDM server components on one physical machine.
One advantage of installing multiple MDM server components on a single machine, as opposed to loading multiple MDM repositories on a single Master Data Server (MDS), is that parallel execution of imports/syndications to/from loaded MDM repositories is possible. Another advantage is that you can have two repositories for separate projects on two different MDM versions on the same machineu2014resulting in reduced TCO. (In previous releases you would be required to separate the repositories on two different MDM servers, and adhere to the recommendation that the Master Data Import Server (MDIS) and Master Data Syndicator Server (MDSS) be run on a separate machine from the Master Data Server (MDS)).
Each Master Data Import Server (MDIS) and Master Data Syndicator Server (MDSS) must be configured to work with one particular MDS only.
You can distribute the MDM server components according to the following hardware configuration options:
●      Multiple Master Data Servers on one machine with remote MDM Import/Syndication Servers on a second machine, and a DBMS on a third machine.
●      Multiple Master Data Servers and MDM Import/Syndication Servers on one machine with a remote DBMS on a separate machine.
●      Multiple Master Data Servers, MDM Import/Syndication Servers, and a DBMS all on one machine.
Test results show that hardware sizing parameters are almost identical for all the aforementioned configuration options; therefore the configuring option you choose should be based solely on your preferred hardware setup.
More information:
●      http://service.sap.com/installmdm71 ® MDM 7.1 Installation Guides for Windows and UNIX (see updated section: Maintaining Multiple MDM Servers on a Host)
●      http://service.sap.com/installmdm71 ® MDM 7.1 Sizing Guide (see new section: Configuration Options for MDM Server Components)
Regards,
Abhishek
Edited by: Abhishek Biwal on Feb 21, 2012 3:30 PM
Edited by: Abhishek Biwal on Feb 21, 2012 4:56 PM

Multiple database instance on one server

Hi experts
We are planning to implement ERP, BI, Solman, CRM and MDSD on windows/oracle platform. There is an idea about system landscape that all database instance of production systems are installed on one server and central instances of each system are installed on separate servers. Is there any performance or maintenance risk about this scenario? What is the advanteges and disadvantages of this landscape? Shall we prefer central system installation?
I'm waiting for your recommandation.
Best Regards...

Hi,
From experience one disadvantage in having an Oracle farm, is if the server plays up
or needs a reboot you of course lose all the systems databases.
Also getting all customers to aggree a maintenance slot together can be a pain.
Failover needs to be considered, DR also.
IMHO separate servers, but that is my preference I'm sure there are advantages.
Mark

Access oracle 10g standard edn one server from oracle 10g exp edn clnt

Hi,
I have installed Oracle 10g standard edition one server. I am trying to access the database through oracle 10g express client. i am not able to configure the connection string. is it possible to connect from express edition client to standard edition database server.
thanks
ajith

is it possible to connect from express edition client to standard edition database server.Yes, of course.
i am not able to configure the connection string.You don't need any. Try
sqlplus username/password@<server name or IP address>/<service name>example :
C:\>sqlplus test/[email protected]/db102
SQL*Plus: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Lun Lug 27 14:05:25 2009
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Connesso a:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options
SQL>

Severely ugly fonts in openjdk6 from testing

I have been using icedtea6 from AUR for months now and I just replaced it with openjdk6 from testing. icedtea6 had ugly fonts, but openjdk6 has severely ugly fonts. It's not too horrible with regular fonts, but it is with bold. A good test is the Font2DTest:
java -jar /usr/lib/jvm/java-1.6.0-openjdk/demo/jfc/Font2DTest/Font2DTest.jar
Does anyone know whether it's possible yet to get good fonts in openjdk6? If so, how?
Last edited by skottish (2008-08-04 18:30:19)

Problem is still here in openjdk6, not in jre/jdk.
I think it is related to: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=495988
Our fontconfig.properties.src is correct, but we have no compilefontconfig.jar, so I cannot try what the bug reporter mentioned, "java -jar compilefontconfig.jar fontconfig.config fontconfig.bfc".
In Ubuntu, they added that file in 6b10-1: "* Install compilefontconfig.jar in openjdk-6-jre-lib package."
Should we have that file?

SSDT: Creation of localDB instances from project file - Sql Server Unit testing purposes

I have a SqlServer Database Project in my solution (VS2013 Professional) which has a corresponding test project with some stored procedure unit tests. Currently I am using a LocalDB and as far as I understand a local database instance is created in C:\Users\[User]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Microsoft
SQL Server Local DB\Instances\Projects and the specific .mdf file referenced in the SQL Server Object Explorer is in C:\Users\[User]\AppData\Local\Microsoft\VisualStudio\SSDT\[ProjectName]. The unit tests run fine on my local machine which I have developed
the project on.
My issue is we have a box which is configured to check out the project file from our version control, build the project using ms build commands and then run the unit tests using VSTest.Console. Usually with C# Test projects we reference the test project
dll and the unit tests run fine. I have referenced the dll for the test project with the stored procedure unit tests in.
With the Stored Procedure unit tests however we get this exception:
Initialization method [project].[spTest].TestInitialize threw exception. System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: A network-related or instance-specific error occurred while establishing a connection to SQL Server. The server was not found or was not accessible. Verify that the instance name is correct and that SQL Server is configured to allow remote connections. (provider: SQL Network Interfaces, error: 50 - Local Database Runtime error occurred. The specified LocalDB instance does not exist.
After some digging I have realised that the localdb instance seems to be created when the project itself is created in VS not when it is built. Specifically when the localdb is first used and if you look into the appData folder of the test machine there
is no corresponding mdf file for the project.
The question is is there a way to set up a localDB instance on the new machine if all you have the project file? The only purpose of the project on the test machine is to run the unit tests, no other development purposes. VS2013 Professional is installed
on the test machine but a solution only using config file changes or MSBuild/VSTest commands would be preferable.
I realise you could change the connection string to an actual test database and run the unit tests of that but we quite like the localdb approach for the testing. I also realise that you could potentially transfer the mdf file (haven't tested this solution)
as well, though I would prefer if there is a solution to my initial question.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh234692.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh309441(v=vs.110).aspx
I have been reading up on LocalDB and I assume a automatic LocalDB is created when you create a sql server database project (ie on localdb first use). I have tried adding the database creation to the test project config file but do not really know where
to go from there. The second link does not really specify when the named localdb will be created if you add the config items and I am not even sure if that is an actual solution. Here's my test project config file for reference
<configSections>
<section name="system.data.localdb" type="System.Data.LocalDBConfigurationSection,System.Data,Version=4.0.0.0,Culture=neutral,PublicKeyToken=[PublicKeyToken]"/>
<section name="SqlUnitTesting_VS2013" type="Microsoft.Data.Tools.Schema.Sql.UnitTesting.Configuration.SqlUnitTestingSection, Microsoft.Data.Tools.Schema.Sql.UnitTesting, Version=12.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=[PublicKeyToken]" />
</configSections>
<system.data.localdb>
<localdbinstances>
<add name="SimpleUnitTestingDB" version="11.0" />
</localdbinstances>
</system.data.localdb>
<SqlUnitTesting_VS2013>
<DatabaseDeployment DatabaseProjectFileName="..\..\..\SimpleUnitTestDB\SimpleUnitTestDB.sqlproj"
Configuration="Release" />
<DataGeneration ClearDatabase="true" />
<ExecutionContext Provider="System.Data.SqlClient" ConnectionString="Data Source=(localdb)\Projects;Initial Catalog=SimpleUnitTestDB;Integrated Security=True;Pooling=False;Connect Timeout=30"
CommandTimeout="30" />
<PrivilegedContext Provider="System.Data.SqlClient" ConnectionString="Data Source=(localdb)\Projects;Initial Catalog=SimpleUnitTestDB;Integrated Security=True;Pooling=False;Connect Timeout=30"
CommandTimeout="30" />
</SqlUnitTesting_VS2013>
Thanks in advance for any response. Sorry if there is any misunderstanding, while I have been using VS to develop from the start, this is the first time I have used a Sql Server Database Project.
Regards,
Christopher.

Yes, you can create a LocalDB instance manually. You use the SqlLocalDb utility, see here:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh212961.aspx
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected]

Using several instances of one ViewObject

Hello
The strange exception was thrown when data in the same cell in a database was updated by two instances of viewobject. (I put one ViewObject several times in ApplicationModule with different names. Sometimes using ViewObjectLinks )
JBO-25014: Another user has changed the row with primary key oracle.jbo.Key[94 ]
Is this bug or feature?
Damir.
P.S. We're using MS SQL Server, ADF BC, ADF Faces, Jdeveloper 11g
Edited by: Damir Yunusov on Dec 12, 2008 5:09 AM

Hi,
Look at configuration in the application module, maybe depend of this.
Matteo

Multiple processes for a host instance on one server

Hi,
One of the prod environment server memory utilization is getting very high every few days. I searched a bit and found that there are many processes for "BTSNTSvc64.exe" in the task manager. Whenever we restart the host instance a new process is
getting created and the previous process is not getting killed.
This caused multiple processes in task manager and every process is occupying some memory. The process is actually not active but it is creating some bad sectors which is causing the Memory utlization to become high.
I am not able to kill the zombie processes either from Task manager. Server reboot is the option but wanted to know a permanent fix.
Can you please tell me the reason as to why this is happening and also the solution?

How many BizTalk Hosts do you have defined on the system? If you have multiple Hosts defined then you're likely to see one host instance associated with each of the hosts. Each host instance is a service and in the "Task Manager" - Processes you will
see multiple BTSNTSvc64.exe OR BTSNTSvc.exe * 32. This is OK is you have multiple host instances defined on your system (Services MMC will show you BizTalk Service BizTalk Group : BizTalk Host) and BizTalk Administration Console ->BizTalk Group ->Platform
Settings -> Host Instances will also show you the different host instances. Each instance is a multi threaded process running different aspects of the BizTalk Framework/Components. So each process will occupy memory if it is "started". All this is normal
behavior. If you're facing performance issues, you might want to ask the solution designer on their rationale for the number of hosts instances.
So when you stop the service, it does not stop? goes into a non-responsive state? and creates another instance?
Regards.

Multiple broker instances on one server

We are running multiple OpenMQ 4.4u1 broker instances on a single server (two different environments, one development and one staging). It appears as though the RC file I installed in /etc/init.d on our RHEL server is designed to manage one and only one broker instance (using the $IMQ_ETCHOME/imqbrokerd.conf file).
Is there an elegant way to have the single RC script manage multiple instances, or should I just create a second RC file and a second $IMQ_ETCHOME/imqbrokerd.conf file to manage the second instance?
Thanks,
Bill

Yes, the MQ RC script is for 1 broker instance only. On Solaris, it's possible to use SMF to manage multiple processes/services. You may want to look for something similar on RHEL or clone/customize the RC script, imqbrokerd.conf and relevant links in rc?.d for each instance

Several JVMs in one server

Hi all,
In our test environment, we need to deploy our application several times to
run on several db.
If we create several server (ex : weblogic/myserver1 and weblogic/myserver2)
do they will use the same jvm?
If yes, is there a way to run them in several JVMs ?
Thanks in advance,
Cedric

Each weblogic runs in its own JVM. We have run dozens before on Sun
development boxes. Just make sure they do not try to attach to the same
port. ;-)
Ben Hanner
Internet Consultant
Xpressive Media, Inc.
[email protected]
"Cedric Rochet" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
>
Hi all,
In our test environment, we need to deploy our application several timesto
run on several db.
If we create several server (ex : weblogic/myserver1 andweblogic/myserver2)
do they will use the same jvm?
If yes, is there a way to run them in several JVMs ?
Thanks in advance,
Cedric

Auto Start five instances in one server

Guru´s
I have a server with five instances. When I restart the server randomly I have problems with some instances. (they do not rise).
In services (windows) I see all the services fine. But in EM I see that instance is down...
Is there a problem in windows when I have 5 instances ?? (in order to after a restart of the server some instances does not start)??

> Is there a problem in windows when I have 5 instances ??
Yes. Absolutely. It does not make any technical sense.
You now have to spend memory on 5 SGAs, and resources on 5 process monitors, 5 system monitors, database writers, log writers and so on.
Not to mention that you need 5 temp tablespaces, 5 sets of redo logs, undo spaces, etc.
Why? What does make 5 small SGA's better than a single large SGA? Or temp space? Or process monitor?
Do you think you scale that way? Oracle scales the exact opposite way. Instead of more physical databases (each needing an instance), Oracle's top end product called RAC scales by using a single physical database and adding more instances to that database - one instance per server.
Granted, there are exceptions where one may want to run multiple instances. Oracle 9i and 10g during a porting project. Forced to do so by using shrink wrap software that uses an "embedded" Oracle database.
But these are by far the exception of the rule. And unless you have a mother of server with virtualisation, what you are doing using Oracle, does not make any technical sense.

What range TCP/IP Port should be give to default or named instance of sql server for security purpose to sql server ?

Hi
i am following technet article for Configure SQL Server security for SharePoint 2013 environments
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff607733?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
i want to change default TCPIP port from 1433 to which ports to change is securable for sql server
i mean in what range
for example can i change to 1500 or 2000 or 1450 etc .
if i assign like these portnos it will not affect to other ports in windows server 2012?
adil

I agree with Erland. (Always a good idea.) Changing the port doesn't help much to prevent attacks. If you decide to do that see Configure a Server to Listen on a Specific TCP Port (SQL Server Configuration Manager)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/ms177440.aspx. Note
"When selecting a port number, consult
http://www.iana.org/assignments/port-numbers for a list of port numbers that are assigned to specific applications."
It's important that you pick a number that isn't used by some other application.
Rick Byham, Microsoft, SQL Server Books Online, Implies no warranty

Error calling a webservice from one server process of the cluster

Hi ,
I have a servlet which on startup makes a call to a webservice. I deploy this webapp on the cluster.
The cluster has two instances each instance having one server process.
So when the server restarts one server process on one instance calls the web service the other process on other instance fails with a 503 response code.
When I tried to reproduce the same problem using two server processes on the same instance both processes are able to call the webservice properly.
I am slightly confused as to how different the second scenario is from first one as both are individual server process and may or may not run on same instance.
Can anyone tell me the real cause.
Rgds
Shashank

Hi Rajat,
This is how the default trace looks
FATAL: Application Servlet failed to notify devices.
Caught java.rmi.RemoteException: Service call exception; nested exception is:
     com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.exceptions.InvalidResponseCodeException: Invalid Response Code: (503) Service Unavailable. The requested URL was:"http://<<server>>:50000/ManagementService/ManagementService?style=document"
     at com.om.mws.standaloneproxy.ManagementServiceBindingStub.notifyDevice(ManagementServiceBindingStub.java:1289)
     at com.om.mws.standaloneproxy.ManagementServiceBindingStub.notifyDevice(ManagementServiceBindingStub.java:1298)
     at com.om.ApplicationServlet$NotifyDevices.run(ApplicationServlet.java:86)
Caused by: com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.exceptions.InvalidResponseCodeException: Invalid Response Code: (503) Service Unavailable. The requested URL was:"http://<<server>>:50000/ManagementService/ManagementService?style=document"
     at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.wsdl2java.soapbinding.MimeHttpBinding.handleResponseMessage(MimeHttpBinding.java:980)
     at com.sap.engine.services.webservices.jaxrpc.wsdl2java.soapbinding.MimeHttpBinding.call(MimeHttpBinding.java:1430)
     at com.om.mws.standaloneproxy.ManagementServiceBindingStub.notifyDevice(ManagementServiceBindingStub.java:1282)
     ... 2 more
java.lang.NoSuchMethodError
at java.lang.Thread.destroy(Thread.java:779)
     at com.omApplicationServlet$NotifyDevices.run(ApplicationServlet.java:92)
Rgds
Shashank

Copy SQL Express DB from one server to another

backup, copy to new machine and restore; fix up user securities on new machine; set up maintenance plans; set up applications to point to new database (or if use DNS, no change..) step and repeat - of course during non-use time frame - my 2 cents

Looking for a good way to move a SQL express DB from an instance on one server to a SQL express instance on another server. I have the ability to connect to both through SSMS. Because these are express instances, I don't have the option to just copy the DB. Any help is appreciated.
This topic first appeared in the Spiceworks Community

Several instances in one server from test purposes

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for