SG 300-10 . Mapping fiber to ethernet ports (vlans?)...

Hi,
the incoming fiber on ports 9 and 10 are on different subnets. I need to map the subnet on port 9 to ethernet ports 1-9 and port 10 is on its own. I have the device IPv4 address set to a static address on the same subnet as port 9. I don't know if there's an easier approach, but I attempted to map the ports using vlans (please see the attached screenshots). We don't yet have the fiber link established for port 10, so I haven't had a chance to test, but I wanted to confirm that my configuration is sound. I used the default vlan for ports 1-9, because I need to manage through that subnet. I added vlan 10 for port 10, but I don't know if I have it configured correctly... Please advise. Thanks..!

Hi Greg,
Fiber ethernet is most likely running at 1000Mbits/sec and any Copper Ethernet interfaces on the switch runs at 1000Mbit/sec. personally the only differentiation I make between the copper or fiber are the distances they can run.
I love your screen captures it shows me that ports 1-9 are untagged in VLAN 1 (default VLAN) and port 10 is untagged in VLAN 10.
It tells me that both fiber runs are running untagged Ethernet frames on both fiber runs.
You have associated a IP address onto VLAN1 so you can manage the switch.
but the next question is;
What are you trying to achieve ?
regards Dave

Similar Messages

Airport Extreme - creating a wired local network from a cellular hotspot without ethernet ports?

Forgive the book I've written below, please. I generally think too much info is better than not enough... I'm looking for assistance and/or suggestions since I have been unable to locate solutions on my own so far. Searching this forum has found a great number of "sort-of" related things, but all of them so far appear to involve apple-only hardware or upstream network devices which have ethernet ports. Nothing that seems to match my situation enough to extrapolate out. Maybe I'm just using the wrong keywords. Anyway....
I've recently moved to a particularly rural area with no wired internet access to speak of (well, I suppose there is dial-up, but... yeah). I've tried several different wireless varieties including satellite, the AT&T Elevate 4G hotspot and a service that used an EVDO-cellular solution(a sprint-based reseller). The former had serious latency issues which I had predicted and so was right-out. The last had signal coverage problems which their maps did not accurately reveal. Their potential mitigation was to have me invest even more money into a super-mega antenna to be roof-mounted. And even that was an uncertain fix. The AT&T solution with the 4G hotspot has been AMAZING so far and I love it. Coverage is great, latency and bandwidth fantastic.
I love it but for one exception, that is. Connectivity options.
There is a particularly limited number of WiFi connections available and only a USB network adapter for a single computer. None of my wired-only network devices can connect directly and I have significantly more WiFi connected devices in general use than the device supports.
I have an Airport Extreme that I was using as my primary connection point through a FiOS router at my previous home(and both the satellite and EVDO modems at the new place). Never had any problems with it when feeding its WAN port with one of the various routers' LAN ports. However, as has been evident by reading all sorts of posts here and elsewhere, having it connect via WiFi to the Elevate means that the ethernet ports are disabled. Not terribly useful.
The Elevate has no ethernet ports. Only WiFi and USB network connectivity.
The Elevate does not appear to have settings available to create a WDS network-- so it cannot be "Extended" via those methods, either, as far as I am able to tell.
So these are some thoughts I've had. Before I invest the time and money into them(both of which are in extremely short supply lately), I'd like to know if anyone else has already solved the issue or can tell me definitively whether these ideas, or some I haven't thought of, will or won't work. Any helpful feedback or thoughts would be sincerely appreciated.
Options I've considered, but are uncertain:
-A Wifi/Ethernet or even ethernet-only router which has a USB WAN uplink(I've had a few bites on searching, but nobody seems 100% clear on the capability for the models I've located). I could plug the Elevate into that USB port and then from there I'm golden. If this is the best option, then can someone recommend a brand/model that they know will work in this way?
-WiFi Access Point (Airport Express, maybe?) that will connect to the elevate via WiFi, and then use its single Ethernet port to serve as the APExtreme's WAN uplink. (I don't know if this will work at all, actually...)
-Connect to the computer via USB, run some kind of network bridging software (which I don't know what the heck that would be) to bridge between the USB Network and the Ethernet port, then run a hard wire from there to the APExtreme's standard ethernet WAN uplink. This is going to be a "last resort" option since it involves software I'm unfamiliar with, even unsure of availability for Mac, and requires the computer to be running and configured properly at all times. Given the way my kids abuse a computer, I can't be certain of anything involving this option.
-Some secret method of turning on WDS capabilities in the Elevate which would then allow my existing base station to become a second node in the chain. I really wish someone could tell me this is possible if only I'd push the right buttons. I see this is as the absolute best option, if it can be done. Cheapest, anyway.
Current set-up:
AT&T Elevate 4G hotspot
WiFi connected devices(rotating since Wifi connection count is limited): Mac PC, 2 iPads, 3 iPhones, Apple TV, a Nokia mini-tablet, a Kindle fire, Wii, XBox 360, an old dell laptop issued by my office.
Apple Aiport Extreme base station
Wired connections: blueray player, television, satellite TV pay-per-view uplinky device thing.
Please, tell me your thoughts?

Had the same issue here. Here is the best solution I have found so far:
Hotspot + Pepwave Max On-The-Go (w/ Load Balancing) + Airport Extreme
I have a VZW MiFi, but I believe this set-up will work with other hotspot devices. I actually have 2 MiFi Hotspots with a monthly allowance of 20G each. They are plugged directly into the Pepwave router (aka, tethered). (Note: you have to have the right cable to do this. The one that came with my Hotspot was only for charging.) If, for some reason, you cannot tether with your Hotspot device, you want a router that offers WiFi as WAN. The Pepwave will do this. The Pepwave is connected to my Airport Extreme via ethernet cable. I have the WiFi on the MiFis and the Pepwave turned off. So the only visible network is my Airport Extreme. The Pepwave is essentially just functioning as a modem.
I used to have a Cradlepoint, but I did not find it very user friendly--too complex for home use. The Pepwave Max OTG is awesome. I got the one with Load Balancing so it allows you to connect up to 4 cellular devices. If you only need the one Hotspot, you can just get the cheaper Pepwave Max OTG. The Pepwave allows me to run off one of the MiFis until I hit my 20G/month allowance, then it automatically switches to the other one. That way I never max-out on my monthly data allowance. Additionally, it gives you a real-time, hourly, daily and monthly running tally on data usage.
The guys at the 3Gstore are excellent and can help you figure out the best solution for your situation.

Forcing a Mac with 2 connected ethernet ports to use one over the other

I have a G5 Quad and a Mac Pro that are connected to a large network (including internet) on ETHERNET 1, and they are also directly connected over ETHERNET 2 (using Jumbo Frames). I need to ensure the G5 uses ETHERNET 2, and not ETHERNET 1, to connect to the Mac Pro. They must use both connections. How do I do this?
Tim

I've solved the problem. When connecting to the other computer, don't map the drive from the Finder sidebar. Instead, go to the Finder, hit Cmd+K, or select Go > Connect to Server..., then type the IP address of the other computer's ethernet port that you are directly connected to. Then write an Applescript to automatically mount the drive on startup.
Example Applescript:
+mount volume "afp://192.168.1.1/"+
Compile and Save the script as an Application with none of the Options checked. Place the script on the remote computer (the G5 Quad in my situation) in a suitable location like the Documents folder for your Username.
Next, on the remote computer, open System Preferences > Accounts, and select the correct account. Select the Login Items tab, and click the + to add your Applescript application to the list. After adding the Applescript, check the Hide checkbox so the script runs in the background. Close System Preferences and you're done. Reboot the computer to verify it connects, and voila!
Tim

My ethernet port is not working

I recently had my macbook sent into the store to repair a bad logic board (fried in a thunderstorm) and over the past month I have noticed that my ethernet port wasn't working. Before the storms our router was acting up so I figured our maintenance was working. When I noticed the bandwidth slowing I checked my ethernet connection only to find I have been using wireless this whole time.
Now I'm not sure if the apple store technicians (it was actually shipped off site to be repaired) checked the ethernet port when I last sent it in because from my knowledge it was working before the storm and I had never checked it afterwards.. I really don't want to be charged another $200 to fix a problem that could have been fixed during the same time as my previous work order.
I also had a bad experience with their timely service, my macbook was there for about a week and a half with no progress on anything when it was supposed to be shipped off site and when it finally was shipped off site it took a matter of two days to be fixed. That would have been two weeks less than my month turn over for this repair.
Any help or suggestions on what I should do and how I should approach the apple store? I really do not want a repeat and cannot afford to turn my macbook taken from me as it is being used for my current job.
P.S. I have singled the ethernet port to my computer as I had used my dad's macbook on the same ethernet cord and his worked, mine did not.

I have updated my computer this morning, it didn't change anything regarding the ethernet port. I also logged onto my windows through bootcamp and ran ipconfig. When I look into the ethernet option it says "media disconnected" could this mean the port is simply loose? or would there be a different sentence there if it was actually damaged. When I went under profiler though it did not say no ethernet ports are found but just listed off the usual numbers.
I'm tempted to reset my SMC but I want to make sure it will have no side effects on my computer, I really hope I can talk to the apple store because I'm really sick of their service to me.
I'm going to ramble for a bit but I feel like I got taken advantage of because I cannot be pushy or rude to others even in inconvenience. It was ~$100 for the repair service which isn't terrible and ~$130 for a new logic board togehter I ended up paying just under $300 for the complete repair which on it's own is not horrible either. However my computer was stuck in their system for a little over a month, it took 1 week to get the diagnosis which from there it should have been shipped off site to be repaired (and if followed how much time it took later on I would have been two days until I had my computer back) however every time I checked the status and called in the genius' replied it has been shipped off site so the status will not update until a repair has been finished. after a week of bombarding people at the apple store with phone calls asking how my computer is doing I finally got a call saying "it has been a week since we have heard from you about your computer, would you like for it to be repaired?". This was unbelievable all of my phone calls did not go through (was around 20 or so multiple ones in a day) and I wasted a week just to find my computer was basically lost in their store. Finally it was shipped off and repaired and sent back to me. When I brought this up to the manager in store she simply stated that there was no confirmation to repair the computer until I answered that phone call over a week later, which is absolutely ridiculous.
I received no other help from that point and ended up paying the full bill (which wasn't my purpose but still..) and I refuse to be treated like that again when it was supposed to be a somewhat simple procedure.
end rant.
Anyway, I really hope this works because I do not feel like repeating this event nor paying another ~100 service fee for something that could have been repaired during the same time.

ACE4710: ¿ can´t I assign IP address to a physical Ethernet port?

Hello team.
I suspect I will receive a "no" as the answer, but I would appreciate confirmation anyway
My customer wants each ACE4710 (of a highly available cluster) to have its own, dedicated port for management purposes.
According to documentation, IP addressing can be applied to VLAN interfaces, so in order to satisfy the requirement, I should make one port belong to an "access VLAN X", and then apply IP addressing to the corresponding "interface VLAN X". This should satisfy my customer´s requirement in an indirect way.
But... ¿ Can´t I just configure IP address on one of the 4 ethernet ports in order to save the work of building the aforementioned VLAN? I am asking this since I do not have access to a real box in order to verify.
Your kind answers will be greatly appreciated.
Regards, Rogelio (Argentina)

Hi ROgelio,
You are right there is no way to assign IP address to physical interface.
ace-4710-1/Admin(config)# int gigabitEthernet 1/1
ace-4710-1/Admin(config-if)# ip ?
% invalid command
cdn-ace-4710-1/Admin(config-if)# ?
Interface config commands:
carrier-delay Set port up delay value
channel-group Map physical port to port channel
description    Interface specific description
do             EXEC command
duplex         Configure duplex operation
end            Exit from configure mode
exit           Exit from this submode
ft-port        Make physical port specific for Fault Tolerance(FT)
no             Negate a command or set its defaults
qos            Configure QoS operation
shutdown       Shut down the interface
speed          Configure speed operation
switchport     Set switching mode characteristics
So there is no option to configure an IP address on physical interface.
regards,
Ajay Kumar

AIR-CAP702W local ethernet ports

Hi all,
The new AIR-CAP702W AP have 4 10/100/1000Base-T local Ethernet ports.
On the data-sheet it's written "for wired devices connectivity".
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/aironet-700-series/data_sheet_c78-728968.html
That's very good, but how do we manage the traffic on these ports?
Are we able to configure theses ports in access-mode with different VLAN-IDs?
So in that case the uplink of the AP should be in trunk-mode.
And where do we configure the ports of the AP, on the WLC?
Or is the traffic from the devices connected into these ports encapsulated into CAPWAP tunnel, like the wireless data traffic, and is terminated into the WLC(s)?
In that case, can we choose what port is associated to what VLAN/SSID on the WLC?
Or something else maybe?
Thank you for your help.
Jerome

The 4 x 10/100/1000BASE-T local Ethernet ports support half and full duplex mode, auto-negotiation, and MDI/MDIX Auto-Sensing. Devices you connect must support auto negotiation if you connect with another mode, say hard configured speed and so on. The port may not be enabled and depending on the version of code, for example 7.6.100.120 the initial release, the ports are not managed.
For now, (until more control is added in the software) all the LAN ports are locally switched, are mapped to the 702W VLAN, and do not appear on the Wireless LAN Controller or AP.
Initially, the ports are disabled and may be enabled manually via CLI.
This was done to minimize any security risks. Here are the CLI commands to enable the ports.
(Cisco Controller)> config ap lan <port id> <enable/disable> <AP-NAME>
(Cisco Controller)> show ap lan <port id> <AP-NAME>
(Cisco Controller)> show ap lan port-summary <AP-NAME>
Hope that helps.

Old Airport Express Ethernet Port Usage

hi there
i have an older airport express (Model No A1264) bought some years back, it has only 1 ethernet port on it instead of 2 on the current model.
i understand the new model has 1 ethernet WAN port for modem, and the other LAN port for ethernet printer or computer.
my question is, the ethernet port on my old airport express is both WAN and LAN? or is it just a WAN port?
because i intend to get an airport extreme to hook up a optical fiber modem which will be located downstairs in my house.
and use my old airport express on the 2nd storey to hook up my etherenet printer, but not sure whether that ethernet port will work? or do i need to purchase the new model?
many thanks in advance

It no longer works.
Unplug the Express, let it rest a minute or two and plug it back it in.
Try a different Ethernet cable.
If still no luck, test the connection by temporarily connecting a laptop to the Ethernet port on the Express using an Ethernet cable that you know is working. Turn off the wirelss on lthe laptop for the "test" and see if you can get a good Internet connection that way.
If you can, you know that the Ethernet port is working, and you will need to focus your troubleshooting on the printer.
If you still cannot get a good connection during the "test", this indicates that the Ethernet port on the Express is no longer working, and the Express will likely need to be replaced.

Issue with cisco ONS 15310. Slot with Ethernet ports, designed for bridging.

Hi, guys. I’ve got an issue with cisco ONS 15310 sdh optical network. I’ve got a special slot with Ethernet ports, designed for bridging. Assume, we’ve got to multiplexers, named A and B with ports A0 and B0 respectively. The ios console of these slots says, the configuration is as follows:
no ip address set on these ports
Ports are administratively up
Auto mdix
Bridge groups are the same on these ports.
Dot1q tunnel.
I’m trying to monitor a device with an ip-address connected to port B0. It answers ping if I connect the notebook directly to a device. But if I connect the notebook to port A0 and ping the device pluged in port B0 through the optical network, it doesn’t answer. I tried connections with straight and cross cable.
Guys, who set the network said, it should work as a point to point bridge with no extra configuration. But it doesn’t. I used wireshark sniffer to lookup what’s happening on port A0. All I see is cdp-s from port A0 and self-announcements of the notebook.
Any suggestions? Thank you in advance.

B
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 3712 bytes
! Last configuration change at
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
hostname B
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
enable password -
clock timezone -
ip subnet-zero
no ip domain-lookup
no mpls traffic-eng auto-bw timers frequency 0
bridge 100 protocol ieee
bridge 140 protocol ieee
bridge 141 protocol ieee
bridge 142 protocol ieee
bridge 143 protocol ieee
bridge 144 protocol ieee
interface Loopback0
ip address 192.x.0.x 255.255.255.255
interface FastEthernet0
description -
no ip address
mode dot1q-tunnel
bridge-group 140
bridge-group 140 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet1
description --- B0 ---
no ip address
mode dot1q-tunnel
bridge-group 141
bridge-group 141 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet2
description -
no ip address
mode dot1q-tunnel
bridge-group 142
bridge-group 142 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet3
description -
no ip address
mode dot1q-tunnel
bridge-group 143
bridge-group 143 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet4
description -
no ip address
mode dot1q-tunnel
bridge-group 144
bridge-group 144 spanning-disabled
interface FastEthernet5
no ip address
shutdown
interface FastEthernet6
no ip address
shutdown
interface FastEthernet7
description -
no ip address
shutdown
mode dot1q-tunnel
bridge-group 100
bridge-group 100 spanning-disabled
interface POS0
description -
no ip address
crc 32
interface POS0.1
encapsulation dot1Q 141
no snmp trap link-status
bridge-group 141
interface POS0.2
encapsulation dot1Q 142
no snmp trap link-status
bridge-group 142
interface POS0.3
encapsulation dot1Q 143
no snmp trap link-status
bridge-group 143
interface POS0.4
encapsulation dot1Q 144
no snmp trap link-status
bridge-group 144
interface POS0.5
description -
encapsulation dot1Q 140
no snmp trap link-status
bridge-group 140
interface POS1
no ip address
crc 32
interface POS1.1
encapsulation dot1Q 100
no snmp trap link-status
bridge-group 100
router ospf 100
log-adjacency-changes
network 192.x.0.x 0.0.0.0 area 0
ip default-gateway [x.x.x.x]
ip classless
no ip http server
snmp-server community public RO
snmp-server ifindex persist
snmp-server trap link ietf
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkdown linkup coldstart warmstart
snmp-server enable traps tty
snmp-server enable traps config
snmp-server enable traps cpu threshold
snmp-server enable traps entity
snmp-server enable traps syslog
snmp-server enable traps hsrp
snmp-server enable traps config-copy
snmp-server enable traps bridge
snmp-server enable traps ospf state-change
snmp-server enable traps ospf errors
snmp-server enable traps ospf retransmit
snmp-server enable traps ospf lsa
snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific state-change
snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific errors
snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific retransmit
snmp-server enable traps ospf cisco-specific lsa
snmp-server enable traps bgp
snmp-server enable traps pim neighbor-change rp-mapping-change invalid-pim-message
snmp-server enable traps ipmulticast
snmp-server enable traps rtr
snmp-server enable traps mpls traffic-eng
snmp-server enable traps mpls ldp
snmp-server enable traps rsvp
snmp-server enable traps l2tun session
snmp-server enable traps mpls vpn
snmp-server host x.x.x.x public
control-plane
line con 0
line vty 0 4
password -
logging synchronous level 4
login
end

ONT: Ethernet port & DGL-4500 router

Hello everyone,
Currently I have only FIOS Internet and do not have any plans to get TV service, so this will make the setup substantially more flexible.
Right now I have my ActionTec configured as a bridge and connected to a Coaxial cable. From the ActionTec, I connect to my DGL-4500. This is my main router. I've had to use the ActionTec as a bridge due to the coaxial cable.
I would prefer to ditch the ActionTec completely and connect my DGL-4500 directly to the ONT via that Ethernet Port. However, there's 2 problems: First, the ethernet port on the ONT has a bunch of clear goo in it, and it's extremely hard to get out. What the heck is this? Secondly, the light is competely turned off, even after plugging it into my router.
The light being off, according to my investigation, is deliberate. This is because you cannot have the MocA and the Ethernet enabled simultaneously. If this is true, I would have to get technical support to enable it remotely, right? I always hate having to call verizon, so if this can be avoided that would be ideal.
The first thing I want to know is if I would benefit by ditching the ActionTec as a bridge and connecting my DGL-4500 router directly. Is there any extra overhead? If the router does no processing and literally acts as a Layer 2 switch, then it shouldn't be too bad. However, I'm worried that it is processing traffic.
Secondly, how easy is it to get the ethernet port enabled? What would you guys recommend for my setup?
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Your issue is simple to resolve - You state you are not a video customer - therefore may use your own router - Via pm provide me with your contact information and I can re-provision your ckt to Ethernet.
ALLEN S.
NETWORK TECH
Verizon Telecom
Fiber Solution Center

Which CISCO switch supports SFP, SFP+ and 10G ethernet ports

I would like to have information about a CISCO switch which can support fiber ports SFP(1g) and SFP+(10g) and copper 1g and 10g ethernet ports. And will it also software upgradable to support L3 protocols ?

You can choose from the Cisco 3560-E, 4900, 4500, and 6500 series switches. That's in order of capability (and cost!), from least to greatest.
The 3560-E and 4900 series are fixed chassis systems (the 4900M is semi-modular) while the 4500 and 6500 series are completely modular - buy the chassis and populate it according to your requirements.
In addition to the references cited above, also refer to the Cisco Products Quick Reference Guide (CPQRG), available at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/qrg/index.html
Hope this helps. Please rate this post if it does.

Question about Ethernet Port

Fumbling in the dark, I knocked by 12" G4 off the table. It must have landed where the ethernet cable connects to the port. I'm now unable to access the network using ethernet. Everything else works okay -- I can use wifi, and all the applications work normally. The reason I use ethernet is because once in a while my wifi connection drops (due to a baby monitor nearby?).
Do you think this would be a simple fix, or should I bring it in to a shop? My husband is pretty handy with computers and has torn his old G3 apart several times.

Nancy: This is probably going to require replacing the logic board, to which the Ethernet port is (was) soldered. It's a difficult job, and the part will cost $200-300 used.
http://www.ifixit.com/Guide/Repair/Installing-PowerBook-G4-Aluminum-12-Inch-1-1- 5-GHz-Logic-Board/553/1

Disable Mac Pro Ethernet ports

Having installed fiber, I am looking for a method to permanetly remove built-in Ethernet options on Mac Pro running 10.8.

Go to System Preferences->Network and select the Ethernet ports and disable them. That will turn them off at a software level.
You can't disable them at a hardware level, unless I guess you break out a screwdriver

Does connecting a TC wirelessly via "join a wireless network" disable the Ethernet ports?

I've been trying to connect my TC wireless to a D-Link router/cable modem provided by Virgin Media. I have successfully enabled the TC to join my wireless network, and can successfully print from my USB printer, and back up my laptop using Time Machine.
However, when I connected my network laser printer to an Ethernet port on the TC, I could not print to it, or even see it on the network. (Naturally, it worked fine connected to the D-Link, or I would not be posting...)
To test my theory, we connected the TC to the D-Link by wire instead. Voila, we can print to the network printer even while it's connected to the TC.
So, can anyone confirm that connecting a TC wirelessly via "join a wireless network" disables the Ethernet ports?
If so, can anyone explain why a £300+ device would do something so daft?
Cheers,
Aegrem

So, can anyone confirm that connecting a TC wirelessly via "join a wireless network" disables the Ethernet ports?
When the TC is configured to "join a wireless network", it becomes a wireless client of the network and does not perform any routing functions, so the etherent ports are not enabled in this type of configuration.
IF...you were using an Apple"n" router as your main base station or router, you could configure the TC to "extend a wireless network", providing more wireless coverage and also enablling the ethernet ports. But, the "extend" feature will only work among Apple devices. Or more correctly, we're not aware of any other devices from any other manufacturers that are compatible with this feature.

MDS9222i Gigabit Ethernet Ports

Hi all,
I have a question about MDS9222i Gigabit Ethernet ports. Are they RJ-45? In other words, to connect one of them to a Gigabit Ethernet RJ-45 port on a Catalyst 4500 supervisor, do I need just a Cat 5e copper cable or are SFPs required?
Thank you in advance,
Gianluca

The mgmt interface supports copper,The 4 ip gigabit interfaceS require a SFP. There is a RJ-45 copper option: DS-SFP-GE-T, or a MM fiber option: DS-SFP-FCGE-SW

PRP-2 Ethernet Ports - Support MPLS ?

I setup lab with 5 units of XR12406, 2 unit as P another 3 units as PE router.
All router came with POS and GigabitEthernet (Fiber) ports. On P1 I use ETH port connect to RR router, well it work without problem..BGP is up and running.
To simulate CE host can ping to other side oof CE host, I connect the host to PRP-2 ETH port, well my notebook don't have Fiber ethernet port.
From host 1 I can ping to the gateway to 10.1.1.1, and host 2 can ping to 10.3.3.3 GW. But I can't ping from host 1 to remote CE host (10.3.3.100). Question is this ETH ports on PRP-2 can support MPLS ? Or I am not suppose to use the ETH port on PRP-2 ?
I knew these ports suppose is for Telnet/SNMP .. management use only.

Dear Tckoon,
As far as i understand your case, there is no need to enable MPLS on the ethernet connected to Host1 or Host2 as this is a customer CE interfaces so it's only assinged to the VPN instance (VRF)
Also i can see that the connectivity between your P and PE router using POS interfaces so there is no Ethernet in bweteen so no MTU issues :)
As long as you can reach PE2 VRF interface so the MPLS-VPN traffic switched fine, so please make sure that Host2 can reach PE2 interface then PE1 VRF interface may Host2 dont have default gateway configured on, if not please provide me with this commands
Show ip bgp vpnv4 all su
Show ip vrf interface abc
show ip vrf detail abc
Show mpls forwarding-table vrf abc
traceroute vrf abc host2 (from PE1)
traceroute vrf abc host1 (from PE2)
Please rate helpful posts.
Best Regards,
Mounir Mohamed

SG 300-10 . Mapping fiber to ethernet ports (vlans?)...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for