SG200-08

Hi,
I bought an SG200-08 switch in december. This one has refused to boot with an orange led port 1 on. The second one I received for the replacement refused to start too. The led system is green flashing all the time and the switch refused to start. I tried the reset without success.
What can I do ? Did I miss something?
Thanks,
Patrick

Hello Patrick,
The Switch is not a dhcp server, what is doing the dhcp for your network?
You may need to configure your pc to a static address in the 192.168.1.x 255.255.255.0 subnet in order to configure the switch to your network.
Please let us know if you need further assistance, or review the quick start guide which can be found here.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/csbss/sf20x_sg20x/quick_start/78-19516-01.pdf
Cisco Small Business Support Center
Randy Manthey
CCNA, CCNA - Security

Similar Messages

  • Problems with IP Phones registration to CUCME on SG200-50P

    Problems with IP Phones registration to CUCME on SG200-50P
    System setup:
    - Router Cisco 2811 with IOS 12.4(24)T5 Advanced IP Services, CUCME 7.1, DHCP Server
       with HWIC-4ESW
    - Switches:
       - old - SLM224P
       - new - SG200-50P (SLM2048PT), OS v1.3.2.02
    - IP Phones 7911 and 7931, OS v8.4.2
    One VLAN (for desktops and IP Phones) and one IP subnet, no voice VLAN.
    Network diagram:
    C2811---HWIC-4ESW---SWITCH---IPPhones
    Problem description:
    1. In the old setup with SLM224P everything works fine.
       Connected phones almost immediately (1-2 sec. after power up) get ip address, configuration and registers to CUCME.
    2. When switch is changed to new SG200-50G:
       - ip phones get their ip address and tftp configuration very slowly - about 10-20 seconds
       - ip phones cant register to CUCME at all. On the router with SCCP debugging turned on there is no sing of registration attempt
       - after reconnecting the old SLM224P situation backs to normal
    Things that have been checked or tried without success:
    - ports speed and duplex auto, correct detection - although not tested with manual settings
    - CDP/LLDP on/off
    - smartport mode auto and most static settings, also with disabled smartport
    - power cycle / reset
    - spanning tree and port security settings
    - solutions from that post - https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2232161
    None of the above methods worked.
    The only action that allowed ip phones to register was changing smartport role to static IPPhone + Desktop.
    After that when phone was disconnected and then reconnected the problem exists again - no registration (IP Phone status DECEASED in CUCME). Same with power cycle/reset.
    Please advice.
    Thanks in advance.

    1 - You have created the voice vlan?
    Nope, flat network, one ip subnet (10 hosts and 10 phones)
    2 - Have you set a phone on an untagged access port for the voice vlan to see if it works?
    Yep, phones are connected to untagged access ports of the one and only vlan
    3 - Have you tried to set the auto voice vlan on the switch so it dynamically assigns the role for ip phone + desktop?
    Not sure about auto voice vlan setting, although there was no triggers to AVV - no static voice vlan, no CDP/VSDP advertisements of voice vlan.
    We've tested static and auto smartport roles (independently of auto voice vlan feature) with successful auto-detection.
    The switch was pretty much in default out-of-the-box config (beside management parameters).
    4 - When rebooting the switch, you did ensure to save the start up to running config?
    Yes, running to startup
    5 - Have you manually set spanning tree PORT FAST for the phone ports?
    No, we haven't tested that. But portfast should be set automatically for the desktop and ip phone smartport roles.

  • VLAN problems with SG200-8P and Cisco ASA 5505 (Sec Plus license)

    Hi,  I've been pulling my hair out trying to get simple vlan trunking working between these devices.
    Basically, no clients on VLAN 99 (guest) will receive DHCP ip addresses when plugged into the SG200.  I have the SG200<>ASA VLAN trunk configured correctly, as I know it, and I've tried numerous variations (set trunk as general tag/untagged, etc., set the ap port to general tag/untag, etc).   Both AP's work properly when connected to the ASA e0/3 port but either will only pull the "inside" VLAN dhcp address when connected to the SG200 switch
    VLAN 1 - inside (has separate dhcp scope assigned by ASA)
    VLAN 99 - guest (has separate dhcp scope assigned by ASA)
    SG200
    purpose
    ASA 5505 (Sec Plus license)
    purpose
    g2
    Trunk 1UP,99T
    Ubiquiti AP (VLAN 1 works, VLAN 99 does not
    g3
    Access port 99T
    vlan 99 does not work
    g8
    Trunk 1UP, 99T
    < Trunk between switch and ASA >
    Int e0/2
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,99
     switchport trunk native vlan 1
     switchport mode trunk
    Int e0/3
    switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,99
     switchport trunk native vlan 1
     switchport mode trunk
    Second ubiquiti AP
    Both VLAN 1 and VLAN 99 clients work properly

    Frustrated - yes.  Confused - maybe not as much, but I could have put some more effort into the overall picture.
    There are two VLANs (1 - native) and (99 - guest).   There is a trunk port between the SG200 and the ASA configured as 1-untagged 99 - tagged.    
    No clients connected to the SG200 on VLAN 99  are able to access the ASA VLAN 99 using either a static VLAN IP address or DHCP.   The problem occurs whether I configure the SG200 with an access port 99-tagged or Trunk port 1UP, 99T or general port 1U, 99UP or any combination thereof.
    Anything connected to the SG200 on the native VLAN works properly.
    Anything connected to the ASA VLANs (1 or 99) works properly
    I have not yet tried to see what the switch is doing with the VLAN tags but I suspect I have some mismatch with the Linksys/Cisco SG200 way of setting up a VLAN and how traditional Cisco switches work.
    I was hoping someone with a working SG200 - Cisco ASA setup could share their port/trunk/VLAN settings or perhaps point me in the right direction.
    SG200 g2 - trunk port (1UP, 99T) -- Access Point
    SG200 g2 - access port (99U)
    SG200 g8 - trunk port (1UP, 99T)  connected to ASA5505  e0/3  
    ASA5505 e0/3  (switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,99,  switchport trunk native vlan 1,  switchport mode trunk)
    Thanks,

  • SG200 how to configure Wake on LAN across subnets

    How can I configure  to support WOL on a SG200 (8 Ports) to support Wake On Lan (Magic Packets) from a different IP Subnet or other SG200 Switch. It seems not to support Directed-Broadcasts.

    I checked out the link and tested the changes. Unfortunately, the WOL still won't work. In the link you attached, it states that you cannot turn on a computer that is off. Does that mean one that is off such as unplugged or in shutdown? Also, one of the steps to configure the firewall access rules says to block all outbound connections for all services. That doesn't make any sense to me, but I might be wrong. I also noticed that the link was for another router. I don't know if that makes a difference. I also read somewhere in the forums that someone else is having a similar problem, saying that Port Forwarding still isn't working in the latest firmware. This whole problem is strange because it used to work all the time on my old router with Port Forwarding, but on this one it won't work at all.
    Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

  • Help with VLANs on SG200-18 and two SG200-08 switches

    Hi everybody. My apologies but I'm only average at best with my CISCO skills. I have simple setup running a few network devices connected via 3 CISCO switches. It's small office and there are two rooms - one with servers and one with printer and pc's. Each room has 8-port SG200-08 switch.
    Router/ firewall is Sonicwall TZ215 and it handles internal routing between VLAN's. Each SG200-08 was connected directly to TZ215 (no SG200-18 yet) and VLANs were working perfectly. Please see diagram below...
    Problems started when I added in the middle larger SG200-18 to handle extra devices. Whatever I'm doing wrong but I can't make VLANs work anymore. Something I'm not setting up correctly in SG200-18.
    Please help me to setup VLANS here - tagged, untagged, PVID, trunk........ I'm completely lost and already had to reset SG200-18 twice.
    My working setup without 18 port switch was like this.
    SG200-08 (1)
        g1  Trunk  1     1U,100T 
        g2  Trunk  1     1U   
        g3  Trunk  1     1U   
        g4  Trunk  1     1U   
        g5  Trunk  1     1U   
        g6  Trunk  1     1U            SERVER3    
        g7  Trunk  100   100U      SERVER1
        g8  Trunk  100   100U      SERVER2
    SG200-08 (2)
        g1  Trunk  1     1U,50T,200T   
        g2  Trunk  1     1U   
        g3  Trunk  1     1U   
        g4  Trunk  1     1U           PC1A
        g5  Trunk  1     1U           PC1B
        g6  Trunk  50    50U        PC2A
        g7  Trunk  50    50U        PC2B
        g8  Trunk  200   200U     NETWORK PRINTER
    Thank you in advance.

    Hello,
    Small switches would remain untouched but 200-18 needs to have the following settings:
     g15 Trunk  1     1U,100T 
     g16  Trunk  1     1U,50T,200T
     g17 Trunk  1     1U,50T,200T
     g18 Trunk   1      1U,50T,100T,200T
    Sonicwall now would have only one port connected to SG200-18 with settinngs matching port g18 on big switch.
    If you notice there is a change as now you would have only 1 port connecting your network to the Sonicwall, would advise you to use port 17 or 18 since they are uplink ports.
    If you have tried to connect two ports to big switch STP would block one of the ports.
    Let me know how it is going :-)
    Aleksandra

  • Trouble With Port Mirroring (SG200-08)

    Trouble with port mirroring.
    Even though both Tx and Rx is specified, only getting half the conversation.  Ping reply only for instance.  And when pinging from other locations no traffic at all.
    Please help
    SG200-008
    FW Version: 1.0.2.0
    Boot Version D.3.1
    Thanks

    I also have problem with the mirroring of port on my SG200-08.  The firmware is 1.0.6.2.
    I mirror the port g1, to which my router to the Internet is connected, to the port g2 to be able to see the traffic with a Centos system running Bandwidthd connected to the port g2.  The problem is that I only see the traffic coming in (downloads from the Internet) and not the traffic comming out (uploads to the Internet).
    When looking at the SG 200-08 on the web interface at "Status and Statistics/Interface" and looking at the port g2, I see values for the "Transmit Statistics", but all the values are at 0 for the "Received Statisticsc" (see the attached file)
    I confirmed that in "Administration/Diagnostic/Port Mirroring" is set up both Tx and Rx (it does not work either if I have Tx or Rx alone: I do not see the uploda traffic to the Internet). See the attached file.
    This is very annoying as I purchased this SG 200-08 especially for this and it does not do the job porperly.
    Does anybody knows a solution to this?

  • Setting Up VLAN and QoS for VOIP on SG200-18

    We recently purchased the SG200-18 smart switch to replace a Netgear unmanaged switch. We're moving our phone service to VOIP through our local ISP as well. 
    I've currently got the VOIP phone plugged into Port 17 on the SG200-18 (it's a Grandstream cordless VOIP phone).
    I want to put the VOIP phone on a separate VLAN from the rest of the network and optimize the QoS settings so that the VOIP phone has exceptional audio quality even during intense network traffic.
    Here's my questions:
    1. Do I need to adjust anything on the type of port for Port 17 (since it looks like some form of Combo port)?
    2. How do I go about isolating the VOIP phone on it's own VLAN (I'm seeing VLAN and Voice VLAN settings, not sure which one to use; I tried setting a VLAN and broke Internet connectivity to the phone until I went in and removed it)?
    3. Do I need to adjust any QoS settings on the switch to better optimize the VOIP phone?
    A couple of additional questions about the GS200-18 in general:
    1. Do I need to adjust any of the System Time Settings on the switch? I'm in Central Time.
    2. Do I need to adjust any of the Green Ethernet/Energy Saving settings or should I stick with the defaults?
    Also, a couple of "getting started" side questions to Cisco:
    1. I've registered a My Cisco account. What do I need to do to register my switch with Cisco and associate it with my My Cisco account?
    2. What are the benefits of taking out a Cisco Small Business Support Contract, and about how much would it cost on the SG200-18 (I ordered it from Provantage)? I'm curious to see if it's worth the money.
    Here's my "specs":
    Switch: SG200-18
    VOIP phone: Grandstream DP715 and 710 expandable handsets
    Plugged into: Port 17 on the SG200-18
    ISP: Local ISP (Direclynx)
    Connection type: 3M down/500k up DSL, moving to a wireless connection coming up which will give us faster speeds
    VOIP backend provider: VOIP Innovations
    Router: Apple Airport Extreme AC model (I run all Macs and iOS devices and OS X Server on the network, so using the Apple router makes setup easier, since it doesn't QoS, trying to QoS and VLAN at the switch level)
    Thanks everyone!

    Hello,
    Lots of different questions here so I'll try to make sure I don't miss anything.
    1. Do I need to adjust anything on the type of port for Port 17 (since it looks like some form of Combo port)?
       The way the combo ports work is you can either use the SFP slot for a fiber connection or the copper ethernet port, but not both at the same time.  Other then that they just function as normal network ports.
    2. How do I go about isolating the VOIP phone on it's own VLAN (I'm seeing VLAN and Voice VLAN settings, not sure which one to use; I tried setting a VLAN and broke Internet connectivity to the phone until I went in and removed it)?
       It sounds like you created the VLAN correctly and assigned the phone, however there wasn't anything doing any routing for that VLAN.  You would need to have a VLAN capable router or a layer 3 switch so that something would act as the default gateway for the voice VLAN and route the traffic for you.  Since there was nothing like this your phone lost it's connectivity to the internet when you placed it in the new VLAN.  I don't think the Airport is VLAN capable, but we will come back to that.
    3. Do I need to adjust any QoS settings on the switch to better optimize the VOIP phone?
       Once you have a seperate VLAN setup for the phone properly you only have to tell the switch what your Auto Voice VLAN is going to be and it will automatically apply recommended QoS settings for the Voice VLAN and prioritize the voice traffic.  There are ways to do this manually and even with the phone in the same VLAN however the are considerably more complicated.
    1. Do I need to adjust any of the System Time Settings on the switch? I'm in Central Time.
       The system time isn't always very important.  You can set the correct time zone, however you should know the switch does not have a battery in it to keep track of time, so if/when it reboots or loses power the clock will reset.  If you would like the switch to maintain accurate time you should setup an NTP server so the time is automatically updated from the internet.  The switch will keep your timezone settings once you save them.  Time is mostly important for logging and things like that, so you can configure it if you like but it is not necessary.
    2. Do I need to adjust any of the Green Ethernet/Energy Saving settings or should I stick with the defaults?
       Green ethernet simply reduces the power usage of the switch slightly, so unless you are having odd issues where ports are disconnecting, I would just leave them at the defaults.
    1. I've registered a My Cisco account. What do I need to do to register my switch with Cisco and associate it with my My Cisco account?
       There isn't really a way to associate your Small Business devices with your Cisco account.  If you ever call in for technical support we will use your Cisco account and your serial number to create a support case, but even then they aren't linked together.  If you decide to buy a support contract, that will be linked to your switch's S/N and your Cisco ID, so in a way that would associate them together.  Devices being associated with Cisco accounts is something more common with Enterprise equipment, and mainly has to do with technical support cases.
    2. What are the benefits of taking out a Cisco Small Business Support Contract, and about how much would it cost on the SG200-18 (I ordered it from Provantage)? I'm curious to see if it's worth the money.
       There are a few advantages to a Support Contact.  Your switch comes with a Limited Lifetime warranty that includes 1 year of technical support and return to factory hardware.  With a service contract you get 3 years of technical support and next business day Advanced Replacement of the switch if it need to be replaced.  I just did a quick google search, and it looks like a contract (part #CON-SBS-SVC2) costs about $50.
    So there are a few other things to consider however.
    As a frame of reference the average VOIP call uses about 64 - 128 kbps max.
    Since you don't have a VLAN capable router or a layer 3 switch, a separate voice VLAN may not be an option.   You also mention that the Apple Airport does not do QoS, meaning we will only be prioritizing the voice traffic while it is on the switch.  When it is passed off to the Airport to be routed out to the internet all of the QoS settings will be lost, and normal network traffic will get the same priority as voice, since that is all up to the Airport.
    With one phone the hassle of getting more equipment and setting up advanced QoS isn't really worth it, especially if the link to the internet isn't going to be participating in QoS.
    One last thing I wanted to mention is you are switching to a wireless internet connection.  I would ask them how their latency and jitter is, as these two network statistics greatly effect voice quality, and usually wireless performs worse when it comes to voice traffic.
    I hope this information helps, if you have any more questions just let me know.
    Thank you for choosing Cisco,
    Christopher Ebert - Network Support Engineer 
    Cisco Small Business Support Center

  • SG200-26P + SF200-24P, LAG? Trunking?

    I'm not a network person by any means and have no problem admitting that. That's why I'm here.
    I have a SG200-26P that is already configured and working properly. It is connected to an ASA5505 that is acting as the DHCP server. We currently have 3 VLANs: 10, 20 & 40.
    We are adding in a SF200-24P and I wanted to LAG & Trunk (I think that's the correct terms) to the 26P and the VLANs would go across both switches. I set up the LAG through the GUI on both devices with GE25/GE26 on the SG200-26P and GE1/GE2 on the SF200-24P as the LAG ports. When I connect them together I can not get an IP address, nor can I ping the 26P from a device connected to the 24P (after setting a static IP to just be able to access the GUI on the 24P).
    SG200-26P = 192.168.1.3
    SF200-24P = 192.168.1.4
    Thanks for any help you can provide. I'm sure this is actually a simple setup but I can't figure it out.

    Hi MHPL, you're correct a LAG and trunk is accurate. When you think about a LAG think of it exactly the same as a single link. You must config it like any singular port and you will observe when configuring the VLAN properties that there is an option for the LAG.
    Moving past that, there are 2 types of LAG, static and dynamic. I recommend that you use static LAG where each side does not use any protocol to negotiate the LAG. So when you go to the port management -> LAG setting simple add the port and click apply (do not click LACP) and make the same configuration on the other switch and connect them. Just ensure that the switches are essentially identical.

  • SG200-08 Loosing MAC addresses of connected devices

    I have a SG200-08 Switch that has in the last month been acting up with certain types of traffic.  On June 7, 2013 I installed the 1.0.6.2 firmware upgrading from 1.0.5.1.  Updating the firmware has not helped. 
    Last week Tuesday a server that was connected to that switch disappeared from the network, looking at the trouble I had to reboot the server and traffic began to flow.  After rebooting the server I found only 1 of 2 MAC addresses from the 1 NIC showing up on the port.
    Today I have a Xerox Workcenter connected to the switch on another port and while working on changing settings on the device I stopping being able to reach the device, could not even ping it.  I went into the switch port showed active, but no MAC address found in the dynamic table for that port. After rebooting the switch I could reach the Xerox again.
    I rebooted the switch on Friday near the end of the day and it was doing better till this morning, all MAC addresses for connected devices were showing up OK.  Is the device defective?  It had been working OK previously, it is connected to another switch on port 1, and that shows a proper table of dynamic MAC addresses.  In both cases of loosing a device it was being used not dormant or in any kind of low power mode.

    Dear Michael,
    Thank you for reaching Small Business Support Community.
    Based on the symptoms; SG200 working fine before, it seems to work ok after reboot, and latest firmware already installed.  It seems to me like a hardware failure but still, in order to confirm, it would be a good idea to restore to factory conditions and configure it manually again.  Just in case that does not help I suggest you to contact the Small Business Support Center for further assistance;
    https://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_small_business_support_center_contacts.html
    Please let me know if there is anything I can assist you with in the meantime.
    Kind regards,
    Jeffrey Rodriguez S. .:|:.:|:.
    Cisco Customer Support Engineer
    *Please rate the Post so other will know when an answer has been found.

  • Packet-Delay and Reordering with a SG200-18-Switch

    Sometimes we see an issue that the switch delays a fragment up to one millisecond. And the delay may cause reordering...
    We are using a "SG200-18 18-Port Gigabit Smart Switch" with the following Version:
    Software Information
    Firmware Version (Active Image):    1.3.2.02
    Firmware MD5 Checksum (Active Image):    4e5ee4d4fcc4f6ee86f4cf39e015e362
    Boot Version:    1.1.0.6
    Boot MD5 Checksum:    01eac6cfe0267f6c28a302c0082b7086
    Here is an extract from capture-files showing the issue. You see that the red-marked fragment is in order when it enters the switch. When it leaves the switch the red-marked fragment is delayed and reordered:
    Capture on the Interface "before" the switch:
    10:18:52.348867 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49508, offset 2960, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 306) 192.168.20.13 > 229.2.1.3: udp
    10:18:52.348868 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49509, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP (17), length: 1500) 192.168.20.13.35917 > 229.2.1.3.5503: UDP, length 3238
    10:18:52.348871 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49509, offset 1480, flags [+], proto: UDP (17), length: 1500) 192.168.20.13 > 229.2.1.3: udp
    10:18:52.348873 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49509, offset 2960, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 306) 192.168.20.13 > 229.2.1.3: udp
    10:18:52.348875 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49510, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP (17), length: 1500) 192.168.20.13.35917 > 229.2.1.3.5503: UDP, length 3238
    Capture on the Interface "after" the switch:
    09:37:42.438678 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49508, offset 2960, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 306) 192.168.20.13 > 229.2.1.3: udp
    09:37:42.438680 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49509, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP (17), length: 1500) 192.168.20.13.35917 > 229.2.1.3.5503: UDP, length 3238
    09:37:42.438681 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49509, offset 2960, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 306) 192.168.20.13 > 229.2.1.3: udp
    09:37:42.438727 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49510, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP (17), length: 1500) 192.168.20.13.35917 > 229.2.1.3.5503: UDP, length 3238
    09:37:42.439077 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49522, offset 2960, flags [none], proto: UDP (17), length: 306) 192.168.20.13 > 229.2.1.3: udp
    09:37:42.439313 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49509, offset 1480, flags [+], proto: UDP (17), length: 1500) 192.168.20.13 > 229.2.1.3: udp
    09:37:42.458090 IP (tos 0x0, ttl  15, id 49523, offset 0, flags [+], proto: UDP (17), length: 1500) 192.168.20.13.35917 > 229.2.1.3.5503: UDP, length 3238
    We looked in the configuration of the switch but we can't find something, so we assume that it might be a bug in the switch...
    It is also remarkable that sometimes the same fragment is delayed by two  different Cisco switches in the setup; so it may be be something about  the content of the packet...
    Any suggestions, what it can be? Thanks in advance!

    Hi Jger, is this for something like a message of the day? What are you using UDP 17 for?  UDP is still best effort which the switch may not necessarily be faulted for. You may try something such as turning off spanning tree on the ports to see if that can help somehow.
    -Tom
    Please mark answered for helpful posts

  • SG200-8 Static mac address problem

    Hi!
    My second problem with sg200-08 (firmware: SG200-08x_FW_1.0.6.2.stk) is when I try to add specific MAC address as secure:
    MAC Address Tables - Static Addresses - Add; insert vlan id, port, mac address and select "Secure":
    I get error message: "Error: Failed to Add 'Static Address' entry.
    Again, thanks for reply!
    Best regards,
    Boris Bahes.

    Moritz Lipfert wrote:I have the same problem using the current firmware 1.0.6.2. But even an upgrade by TFTP followed by a factory reset does not help. A downgrade to firmware 1.0.5.1 also does not fix this issue.Are there any other suggestions?
    Strange as it may sound, try playing with compatibility mode in Internet Explorer. I have found that these switches interface respond well only in IE.

  • SLM2008 to SG200-08 VLAN

    Hi,
    I have the following setup:
    Service Provider connected to SLM2008 port 2
    SLM2008 connected to SG300-20 using LAG2
    SG300-20 connected to SG200-08 using LAG1
    SG200-08 port 1 connected to PC
    I have configured VLAN 4 to isolate this (port-to-port)​ traffic from the rest of the network, however I can't obtain an IP address from the SP.
    SLM2008 : port 2 PVID 4 all frame types accepted, VLAN ID 4 assigned to port 2 and LAG 2 (consisting of port 5&6)
    on the SG300-20, the Port VLAN Membership Table shows LAG1 & 2 with 1UP, 4T (so supposed to transport VLANs 1 & 4, 1 being the default)
    SG200-08 shows Port VLAN Membership Table port 1 in access mode with PVID 4 and operational VLAN membership 4U. I can't put it to 4T except in generic mode, but this doesn't work either.
    What am I missing here ?
    Any input/feedback would be highly appreciated.
    Christophe

    Hi chrebert,
    Thanks for your answer. You're right in concluding the VLAN 1 is my default VLAN. The problem is that the switch should contact my DHCP server over VLAN 1 and since the traffic on port 1 is not tagged, the traffic DHCP request will never reach my DHCP server. As a consequence, the switch always ends up with its factory default IP address (192.168.1.254) instead of the IP address assigned by the DHCP server. And yes, that's a problem
    So to summarize, when I configure tagged access for VLAN 1 on port 1 and write this to the startup config, it is indeed present in the startup config afterwards. However, the switch ignores this upon reboot, causing VLAN 1 on port 1 to feature untagged access.
    By the way, I completely set up the switch from scratch after restoring the config to factory defaults. It would be great if you could try to reproduce the issue and hopefully come with a fix. In case you need more information, please don't hesitate to contact me.

  • Operating a SG200-08 switch with case removed.

    I am going to be putting an SG200-08 (8 port switch) inside a 2U rackmount chassis.
    To enhance cooling I thought I would remove the outer case.
    Are there, or would there be any issues with using the switch with the cover removed?
    Thanks
    Glen

    Hi Glen, the first issue would be, the warranty is void and you're not entitled to any support. The second issue would be static electricity and environmental concerns. The third issue would likely be your property insurance.
    It is highly against recommendation to alter or modify these units.
    -Tom
    Please mark answered for helpful posts

  • SG200-08 - Not Mirroring Broadcasts

    For Example:
         Non broadcast ARP requests ARE seen on mirror.
         ARP replies ARE seen on mirror.
         Broadcast ARP requests however are NOT seen on mirror.
    Same with other broadcasts. They are NOT seen on mirror.
    Model: SG200-08
    Firmware Version: 1.0.6.2

    Configuration:
    g3 mirror of g8 (both tx & rx).
    g6 tagged member vlan 99; untagged member vlan 1, pvid 1
    g8 untagged member vlan 99, pvid 99
    Scenario:
    Client connected to g6 tagged vlan 99 sends out a broadcast.
    Vlan 99 untagged member g8 transmits the broadcast. But it is not seen at the g3 mirror of g8.
    However if g6 is mirrored to g3 instead, then the broadcast, received from client, ingress, is seen.
    Once again it appears this Cisco SG200-08 mirroring is not properly/fully implemented.  Especially regarding traffic egress.

  • SG200 Switch not forwarding Packet

    Hello,
    I have a problem with my SG200-08 Switch the switch not fowarding a special Packet.
    I try to run a simple Profinet installation for testing on the switch but it didn´t work correct. A special packet (Profinet error message) was not forwarded.
    I have tried it with different Profinet masters with Siemens Profinet master it works without of problems. With Rexroth master it dosn´t work. But it is the same packet only another Mac Address.
    I have added two Wireshark logs, where I have mirrored the slave and the master port. With the Siemens master all packets are forwarding (every packet is double loged) with the Rexroth master the alarm packet was not forwarding (the alarmpacket is lost between the ports).
    With a not managed Switch it is no problem too run both Installations korrekt.
    I have tried the Factory devault Settings of the switch and too deaktivate all services of the switch (like Spanning Tree, ..) but it was all the same, the Packet was not forwarded.
    Has someone a idea which is the cause of the packet drop?

    Hi Ulf, the switch doesn't filter traffic and this particular model doesn't have any special connection controls like ACL.
    Features that may be service affecting include-
    Spanning tree (portfast, bpdu flood/filter)
    Port negotiation (speed/duplex)
    Energy efficient ethernet
    Bonjour discovery
    Storm control (which is disabled by default)
    I couldn't think of anything else that may be service affecting. You may disable spanning tree, manually set the port speed, disable EEE and bonjour if you want. However, I don't feel it will resolve your problems but it is worth trying if you feel the switch is the problem. Since the packet is forwarding correctly, it would appear to be a localized system setting.
    -Tom
    Please mark answered for helpful posts

Maybe you are looking for