SG200 Small business switch - vlan issue

I have the wonderous task of remotely configuring a few SG200 small business switches.
I need to create a vlan and move a few ports into that vlan, doesn't sound too difficult.
I have created the vlans but when I go to add the ports into the vlan the only option I seem to have is General?
If I specify access I can't say what vlan the port should be in?
What am I doing wrong?
All ports are currently in VLAN 1 and are in mode trunk
I have created 2 new vlans and just want to put 4 ports in VLAN 2 and 4 ports in VLAN 4
Can anyone impart any wisdom?
Thanks
Roger

Hi Roger,
Did you try this guide?
http://sbkb.cisco.com/CiscoSB/Loginr.aspx?login=1&pid=2&app=search&vw=1&articleid=80
Are you configuring it from GUI or CLI ?
Regards
Mariusz

Similar Messages

Issues with Small Business Switch config

Hi, I know that if I read the documentation I will come to the answers but I would really like some input from someone with more knowledge than me. I have an issue with Cisco SF300 , one of the Small Business Switches. I have a single interface on my router and I need to separate my internal networks , I thought that one way would be to use VLANs. On my two internal networks one network only has unmanaged D-Link switches, the other has the Cisco SF300 so I did as follows.
On the Cisco Switch, all ports default to Trunk ports. I have changed FE1-FE24 and GE1-2 to access ports.
Created two VLANS and placed FE1-FE24 in VLAN10 (also my management VLAN) , GE3 is a trunk Port for VLAN20 untagged, VLAN 20 uplinks to my DiLink Switches. This way traffic from my unmanaged switches comes in on a trunk port untagged on VLAN20.
GE4 is a trunk port and I have assigned VLAN1 untagged, VLAN10 tagged and VLAN20 tagged. VLAN 10 and VLAN 20 then forward to my Router.
The plan was to connect GE4 to my router however I had two things happen I can not explain.
Firstly as soon as I connected my D-Link to GE3 the LAN on VLAN20 went down, I could not ping Servers from PCs etc, all devices are connected to the unmanaged D-Links. Secondly the VLAN Assigment changed on GE3 and GE4 , VLANs 10 and 20 disappeared and only the default VLAN was assigned, also under VLAN Settings my VLAN interface state for VLAN20 shows Disabled. Also one of my access ports FE12 keeps changing VLAN.
Can anyone offer any suggestions as to what might have crashed the LAN and why my VLANs change. I did write my running config to the start up config by the way.
I added two screen shots.
I would seriously appreciate some help.
Thanks
Bob

Hi Garrett, thanks for your reply to my post, I hope you are well. I called Cisco support, they told me that they could not understand why this was happening and suggested a firmware upgrade, usually something I should have considered right from the beginning. This solved the issue for me.
Thanks
Bob

Best small business switch for 100-300 user UC deployments

Hello,
The SMART Designs state that both the ESW500 and 300-series switches should not be used for deployments of over 100 IP phones.
But now that both the UC560 can go up to 138 (128 IP phones) and the BE3000 can go up to 300 users is this design restriction still valid or is the Catalyst 2960 and above the only options?
The QPT is still showing both the 300- and ESW500 switches as options for all versions of the UC560, and the 300- and 2960 switches are shown as valid options in the LAN for the BE3000.
Thanks.

Hi All,
I would agree with the folks at smartdesign, but for a very differerent reason as suggested by kmacpherson..
But think about the Business Edition 3000 (BE3000) and how it's supported. BE3000 is supported by the traditional Cisco TAC that also supports the catalyst 2960S etc....
The 300 series switch is supported by the wonder folk at the Small Business Support Center (SBSC) .
300 series of switches are generations ahead of the ESW switch in terms of switch silicon/features/GUI/supported CLI/IPv6 support etc..it is a tremendous switch series..
From my perspective, even though there is now a lot of dialogue between TAC and SBSC these days, it sorta makes a lot of sense in my mind to position Catalyst switches in conjunction with BE3000 for your end users, and 300 series small business switches as a lower cost alternative.
This will mean there will be pretty seamless TAC support for a BE3000, catalyst, ISRG2 solution.
regards Dave

Help blocking certain website and IP on a SG 300-20 Small Business Switch

Hi,
I like to block certain IP and website on the SG 300-20.
Being new to Cisco Small Business switch I she tried with no positive result. Could someone give me some steps or maybe direct me where I can find a step by step resource.
Thank you

Hello,
Thank you for contacting us for support with your device.
Unfortunately what you are trying to do is not possible with any Small Business switch.
It is true that this switch can be used in layer 3 and it will be able to route your traffic on the inside of the network, but it will not be able to route your traffic to the Internet as it doesn't do any NATting.
If you need to block any websites you will need to configure it on your router or firewall.
Just to be completely clear, this switch won't be able to block any websites.
I hope this was helpful

LMS 3.2 and Cisco Small Business Switches

Hi there,
I'm currently using LMS 3.2 to monitor my network. We've recently purchsed a few of the Cisco Small Business Switches, the SF 300-24 model to be exact. They're considered 'managed switches' (tho thier CLI is terrible) and I would like to monitor them in CWLMS. My problem is that once I add it to CS, it doesn't resolve to anything, just sits there as a blue box with a question mark. I'm assuming this means that these devices are not (currently) supported by LMS 3.2 - do you know if that will change, or how I can go about managing this device with LMS 3.2?
Thanks

Unfortunately that series of products is not supported in any version of LMS (or even Cisco Network Assistant - CNA).
Cisco provides the FindIt utility to manage them:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps10660/tsd_products_support_series_home.html
Hope this helps.

Small Business switches and POODLE

Has Cisco done any research into small business switches being vulnerable to POODLE? I know they're working hard on the enterprise side, but I'm not finding any information on the small business side.

Hi,
All Cisco product will be checked and results are posted on the same page as for enterprise:
http://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-20141015-poodle
Regards,
Aleksandra

Cisco Small Business 300 VLAN Features?

Hi Everyone,
Please help me to understand some features of Cisco Small Business 300 Series Managed Switches. one of this is "Static routing/Layer 3 IP routing between VLANs allows for communicating across VLANs without degrading application performance" what is this means can i create VLAN or just VLAN can pass thrue this kind of switch? how about this feautres from Cisco Catalyst 2960 Series Switches " The ability to set up virtual LANs soemployees are connected by organizational functions, project teams, or applications rather than on a physical or geographical basis" what is the difference of this features of this different model of switches? thanks...
Raffy

Raffy,
This switch is a layer2 or a layer 3 switch, which ever you set it to.
If you have it in layer 3 mode the switch can do routing between vlans. If in layer 2, you can setup a trunk port to a router that understands vlans and allow inter-vlan connectivity that way.
Its based on what your router can do. If your router understands vlans, then you can leave it in layer 2 mode and create your vlans and trunk to the router.
If it does not understand vlan tagging, you can put the switch in layer 3 and put an ip address on the vlan interfaces and let the switch be the gateway for the vlans. Then the switch will do the routing from one vlan to the other.

Small business switches and CDP

what switches in the small business category support CDP?
I took a look at the SGE and SFE series but nothing was mentioned about CDP support. I would like something lower grade than the ESW series if possible.

You may want to take a look at the Cisco Small Business 200 and the 300 Series switches, both switch lines now support CDP.

How to setup Private VLAN in Small business switch SF200-24

Dear All,
According release notes 1.4 , private vlan is supported. I've upgraded my SF200-24 with firmware 1.4.0.88 and boot 1.3.5.06. The system information show firmware version 1.4.0.88 and boot version 1.3.5.06 after reboot. I can't find private vlan setup command on GUI. Please help me to setup private vlan. Thanks.

Hi,
Unfortunately PVLAN is not supported on 200 series. However you might be able to overcome this using general port concept.
for example:
isolated port - general 10P (PVID), 30U, drop tagged traffic
community - 20UP, 30U, drop tagged traffic
promiscuous - 30UP, 10U, 20U
Note: primary vlan 30
does it address your requirements?
Aleksandra

Cisco7 WS-C350G-48TS Switch/VLAN Issue

Our C3705 has 4 VLANs configured on it. The subnet for VLAN1 is 192.168.1.x and I'm connected to a port on this switch on that VLAN. My connection goes from the switchport, to patch panel, to dataport on wall. From there I've ran another patch cable to a small D-link switch in order to enable a few extra ports for attaching my test systems. My workstation is also attached to this D=Link switch. I can get a DHCP address through this D_Link switch but if I connect any other workstations to it they cannot get a DHCP address. Instead they get the APIPA 169.x.x.x address. I swapped out the D-Link with another generic switch just to make sure that the D-Link wasn't the problem but still getting the same result. If I change my connection to another VLAN, my workstation and other test systems connected to the small switch can get a DHCP address. I'm suspecting that there is a misconfiguration or missing configuration on VLAN1 which is causing the anomaly but having some difficulty trying to determine what that is. Also note that our DHCP server is a Windows DC, also on VLAN1. Would greatly appreciate any input that could possibly shed some light on this.
Thanks!
RA

Sure.
Switch01#sh run int vlan1
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 61 bytes
interface Vlan1
ip address 192.168.1.7 255.255.255.0
end
Switch01#sh vlan
VLAN Name                             Status    Ports
1    default                          active    Gi1/0/3, Gi1/0/4, Gi1/0/5
                                                Gi1/0/10, Gi1/0/12, Gi1/0/14
                                                Gi1/0/15, Gi1/0/16, Gi1/0/31
                                                Gi1/0/32, Gi1/0/49, Gi1/0/50
                                                Gi1/0/51, Gi1/0/52
2    VLAN0002                         active    Gi1/0/24, Gi1/0/25, Gi1/0/26
                                                Gi1/0/28, Gi1/0/33, Gi1/0/34
3    VLAN0003                         active    Gi1/0/35, Gi1/0/37, Gi1/0/38
                                                Gi1/0/39, Gi1/0/40
4    VLAN0004                         active    Gi1/0/41, Gi1/0/42, Gi1/0/43
                                                Gi1/0/44
5    VLAN0005                         active    Gi1/0/45, Gi1/0/46, Gi1/0/47
                                                Gi1/0/48
100 VLAN0100                         active
200 VLAN0200                         active
300 VLAN0300                         active
600 VLAN0600                         active
700 VLAN0700                         active
900 VLAN0900                         active
1002 fddi-default                     act/unsup
VLAN Name                             Status    Ports
1003 token-ring-default               act/unsup
1004 fddinet-default                  act/unsup
1005 trnet-default                    act/unsup
VLAN Type SAID       MTU   Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2
1    enet 100001     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
2    enet 100002     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
3    enet 100003     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
4    enet 100004     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
5    enet 100005     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
100 enet 100100     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
200 enet 100200     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
300 enet 100300     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
600 enet 100600     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
700 enet 100700     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
900 enet 100900     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
1002 fddi 101002     1500 -      -      -        -    -        0      0
1003 tr    101003     1500 -      -      -        -    srb      0      0
1004 fdnet 101004     1500 -      -      -        ieee -        0      0
VLAN Type SAID       MTU   Parent RingNo BridgeNo Stp BrdgMode Trans1 Trans2
1005 trnet 101005     1500 -      -      -        ibm -        0      0
Remote SPAN VLANs
Primary Secondary Type              Ports

So, does STP just not work on the Small Business Switches?

Hi All,
I have an SG500-52P switch, and a catalyst 3650 switch. I want to connect two links between the switches, and have STP block one of them for redundancy in the event of a link failure. When I set this up, I got a duplicate IP address discovered message in the 500 switch, followed by the network crashing/locking up from what I can only assume was an STP loop. Show spanning-tree on the 3650 before the crash showed that both of the ports were in FWD state - meaning that STP was not blocking redundant paths.
Verification that STP is running and BPDU's are flooding on the 500 can be found below:
SW500A#show spanning-tree
Spanning tree enabled mode RSTP
Default port cost method: long
Root ID Priority 24577
Address a0:ec:f9:ef:6a:00
Cost 20000
Port gi1/1/43
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 32768
Address 2c:3e:cf:ff:11:82
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
SW500A#show spanning-tree bpdu
Global: Flooding
SW3650#show spanning-tree
VLAN0001
Spanning tree enabled protocol ieee
Root ID Priority 24577
Address a0ec.f9ef.6a00
This bridge is the root
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Bridge ID Priority 24577 (priority 24576 sys-id-ext 1)
Address a0ec.f9ef.6a00
Hello Time 2 sec Max Age 20 sec Forward Delay 15 sec
Aging Time 300 sec
SW3650#show spanning-tree sum
Switch is in pvst mode
Root bridge for: VLAN0001, VLAN0003
Extended system ID is enabled
Portfast Default is disabled
PortFast BPDU Guard Default is disabled
Portfast BPDU Filter Default is disabled
Loopguard Default is disabled
EtherChannel misconfig guard is enabled
UplinkFast is disabled
BackboneFast is disabled
Configured Pathcost method used is short
The only thing I see is that the cost method in the 500 is long, while the cost method in the 3650 is short.
Am I missing something?

Hi
from your outputs seems that both switches understand each-other BPDU's (at least via one link!), because SW500A is not root bridge for that segment and accepts SW3650 to be root bridge.
> spanning-tree on the 3650 before the crash showed that both of the ports were in FWD state
I hope this is correct behavior as SW3650 is root bridge. This means that all ports on root bridge are designated ports and thus are in FWD state.
The switch-port which should be blocked must be on opposite (non-root) switch SW500A.
But be careful in your scenario: there could be potentially compatibility issue as:
SW500A is using Rapid STP (single - common - instance over all VLAN's)
SW3650 is using PVST+ (Per VLAN Spanning Tree)
the compatibility works in this scenario only in case, that all links between SW3650 and SW500A use VLAN1 as untagged VLAN.
That means: to allow Cisco SW3650 switch running rapid PVST+ or PVST+ to form a common spanning tree with SW500A switch running RSTP or STP, vlan1 (the native VLAN) must be configured as untagged on the SW3650 ports connected to SW500A switch.
If this is not met, it can leads to switching loops. And that could be your case.

SMALL BUSINESS SWITCH SLM 2024

Hi , for some reason, i cannot access the switch via the web interface. i reset the switch to factory settings , and the same thing happens. i tried to access the switch via a diferrent pc and still the same, i would appreciate some help on this.

Ishal,
Are you able to ping the device?
Have you changed the management vlan on the device by chance?
If all else fails have you Tried resetting the switch and plug directly into it and get into it with the default ip address of 192.168.1.254?

Vista - Outlook 2007 small business and calendar issues

I've read every thing I can, tried all suggestions, including rebuilding my .pst file, restoring my phone, checking the add on, etc...still can't get my calendar to sync properly. What else is there to try...I'm at my wits end here
I've removed several programs from my computer (HP Laptop zd8215us), tried a reinstall of office 2007 but still no luck...is this something that can be fixed? if not I'll have to return this awesome phone for one little quirk I can't live without, and the AT&T sales rep assured me there were no issues with sync'n data with outlook...gave up my blackjack for the same issues.....grrrrr

Well. Working just fine now, since uninstalling and re-installing icloud and syncing.

DHCP SNOOPING IN CISCO SF200-48 SMALL BUSINESS SWITCH

Please help me out. I need to know whether dhcp snooping is available in cisco firmware version 1.3.7.18.

Hi Bonnie, as far as I know DHCP snooping is not on the SX200 switch.I also am unable to find documentation within release notes and the admin guide stating it does.

Cisco Small Business Pro Switch pricing...

As a very long time Linksys user I am not totally unhappy that the Linksys name is no longer part of the product designation.
We provide IT management and support to many SME businesses. Part of our management functions on behalf of our clients is to ensure value for money. From a Linksys aspect, in the past this meant a trade-off between value (low-cost - a Linksys benefit) and reliability and stability.
On the one hand, we continuously had to monitor and test firmware upgrades before implementation. On the other hand we have many clients still running netwrok VPNs on 6 year old BEFVP41 units with no outages at all due to the equipment...
With this experience in mind, we are anticipating that the Small Business Pro equipment is likely to be fully specified and tested, for which we will gladly recommend to our clients the higher prices commensurate with that reliability and stability.
From this perspective, we have tested the SA520 and the AP541N and the initial results are favorable - they appear to be an improvement on the Linksys RVS4000 and the RV042. Pricing is higher, but not exorbitantly so.
When looking at the switch pricing, however, I was unimpressed to find that the 24 port Gigabit switch is north of $1,300 - amost 3 times the price of the SRW2024.
I realize that pricing is a corporate decision by Cisco - and I have no doubt that they do not want to have their Small Business Pro series cannibalizing the corporate switch sales. However, we cannot recommend this to client management as it is excessive. Given that we set the standards for all of our clients (and ALL of our clients are currently using LInksys products as an exclusive standard - we do not permit any other networking equipment), our choice is difficult:
Do we stick with the Cisco Small Business Pro for the WAN aspects of client networks and evaluate other vendors for the LAN elements?
Given that we have been badly burned by both Linksys One and Microsoft ResponsePoint, we specifically no longer specify IP voice systems by network vendors, so any infrastructure-specific advantages in this regard are not an issue.
Any other perspectives on this?

The Small Business Pro ESW 500 Switches actually differ from their Linksys and Cisco Small Business counterparts by these features:
Better interoperability with Cisco and Cisco Small Business Pro products
Cisco Discovery Protocol (CDP)
EtherChannel
Cisco Configuration Assistant configurability and manageability
Integration with the Cisco Smart Business Communication System (SBCS) solution
Smartport roles for easy configuration of switchports, both in the ESW Web GUI and in the Cisco Configuration Assistant program
Ability to connect Cisco Unified IP Phones into an ESW switch as part of a SBCS deployment
ESW 500 switches have a higher level of support than the Linksys and Small Business counterparts because Cisco Small Business Pro Service is offered on the ESW 500 switches
The ESW 500 Web GUI is actually similar to the GUI found on the Linksys and Cisco Small Business counterparts. ESW 500 might actually be a better option with the SA500 because:
CCA 2.2(1) and later can manage the SA500, the AP541N, and the ESW 500 switches, even if they are deployed outside of the SBCS solution.
Cisco Small Business Pro Service is available on ESW switches, but not on Linksys or Cisco Small Business products

SG200 Small business switch - vlan issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for