SG200 vlan trunking?
Hello,
does SG200 supoort VLAN Trunking?
Hello, I think there is support:
I found this site too which shows how to configure it: http://lachlanmiskin.com/blog/2012/08/01/cisco-sg-200-08-trunking/
Cisco's datasheet says it supports tagging 802.1q.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/switches/ps5718/ps11229/data_sheet_c78-667827.html
Hope this helps.
Please rate useful posts and remember to mark any solved questions as answered. Thank you.
Similar Messages
-
Does the 8540 support VLAN Trunking
I would like to VLAN trunk four VLANs(8540 bridge-groups) from an 8540 switch router to a Cat 5000. I have not seen in Cisco's documentation anything that indicates that the 8540 supports VLAN trunking.
8540 supports both ISL and 802.1q VLAN trunking
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/atm/c8540/12_1/pereg_1/quick_cg/layer3.htm#39775 -
Encrypting vlan-trunk traffic between switches
Hi,
Can anyone guide me to some papers or other resources on how to encrypt traffic between 2 switches. The switchces will be connected with fiber and use dot-1q tagging. And I wan't to encrypt all of the trunked traffic.
I was thinking of L2TP, but I haven't found any good description on how to implement this. I have two 3750 switches I thought I might use.
Thanks for any input,
Regards,
Oyvind Mathiesen
mnemonic
NorwayHi,
Thanks for the response. I had a look at MACsec and it looks good. I would have liked to employ something P2P though, to also limit the ammount of MAC addresses broadcasted on the "wire". But let me first give you an understanding of the task:
We have two sites, connected via fibre and we want to create a VLAN trunk across and order to expand the broadcast domains to te other site.
The IDIOT carrier, has a limitation on the number of MAC addresses they allow on the fibre service, 100.
We also need to encrypt the datatraversing this connectivity.
MACsec wuold work 100% exept the source and dstination MAC addresses are still sent (at least according to https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:LEf2qOmYZyYJ:www.ieee802.org/1/files/public/docs2011/bn-hutchison-macsec-sample-packets-0511.pdf+&hl=en&gl=za&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEESgmAHXpDOY0RBAE-Rv1HDpu_C_gkeSPN4cv6NGgyP0M1aXVu0UqzCfxo8t_P41ep6J37k4OLKnjfp1M9hoTDHxY22WGz2h7yB7YRLyPvRUbGS8TICzvEMlG92xqbhy6RWFugmnj&sig=AHIEtbTfu0LQIJejdYidE6yzq4lpPifxjQ
And that would cause me to eat into the 100 MAC limit.
Ridiculous I know, but we are looking for an out-of-the-norm plan...
Thanks -
Cisco VLAN Trunking Protocol Vulnerability
I have got a cisco 2821 model router with a c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.151-2.T4 IOS, and was reported with 'Cisco VLAN Trunking Protocol Vulnerability'.
Though the device is in server mode, I do not have any domain name or trunk port configured.
Is my device really vulnerable? If yes, whats next?Hi Alex,
for the trunk port on Catalyst on port GE 1/0/45, we need to enable the trunk and for on encapsulation dot1q because this catalyst model is ISL capable also and the SF300 working only with Dot1q Encapsultion
The configuration on catalyst should :
#config terminal
#interface Gi 1/0/45
# switchport encapsulation
#switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
#switchport mode trunk
#switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-103
#spanning-tree portfast
For SF300 the port trunk it looks fine but for the port where the PC should receive an IP address
#interface fastethernet29
#switchport mode access
#switchport ccess vlan 103
Please let me know after this configuration
Thanks
Mehdi
Please rate or mark as answered to help other Cisco Customers -
Decided we'd give the Cisco 300 series switches a try and see
what we think about them compared to our Cisco Catalyst 2960 switches.
I'm already stumped on setting up VLAN trunking between 4 switches. Do I have to manually setup all the VLAN's on each switch? I set them up on the first switch and was expecting GVRP would propagate them to the others like VTP.
DennyDecided we'd give the Cisco 300 series switches a try and see
what we think about them compared to our Cisco Catalyst 2960 switches.
I'm already stumped on setting up VLAN trunking between 4 switches. Do I have to manually setup all the VLAN's on each switch? I set them up on the first switch and was expecting GVRP would propagate them to the others like VTP.
Denny -
How many VLANs supported via MACsec VLAN-trunk link?
Hi,
Any one know how many VLANs maximum allowed across a MACsec link between two C6500 with Sup2Ts or between two N7K respectively?
As far as I know, C3750X has limitation of 8 VLANs, according to
•Cisco TrustSec enforcement is supported only on up to eight VLANs on a VLAN-trunk link. If there are more than eight VLANs configured on a VLAN-trunk link and Cisco TrustSec enforcement is enabled on those VLANs, the switch ports on those VLAN-trunk links will be error-disabled.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750x_3560x/software/release/15-0_2_se/configuration/guide/3750x_cg/trustsec.html
Thanks,
CedarHi,
Any one know how many VLANs maximum allowed across a MACsec link between two C6500 with Sup2Ts or between two N7K respectively?
As far as I know, C3750X has limitation of 8 VLANs, according to
•Cisco TrustSec enforcement is supported only on up to eight VLANs on a VLAN-trunk link. If there are more than eight VLANs configured on a VLAN-trunk link and Cisco TrustSec enforcement is enabled on those VLANs, the switch ports on those VLAN-trunk links will be error-disabled.
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3750x_3560x/software/release/15-0_2_se/configuration/guide/3750x_cg/trustsec.html
Thanks,
Cedar -
Is it possible to run a VLAN trunk (DOT1Q) from a Central site to a remote over a MPLS connection?
You can do that either by using dot1q tunnelling or port based EoMPLS. For a description of these two features, please refer to the following document:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps5013/products_feature_guide09186a0080088187.html
Hope this helps, -
WRVS4400N VLAN trunking question
Hi all,
I just got a SRW224G4 today my main objective is to trunk 30 VLAN(s) to my WRVS4400N for interVLAN communication. So far I set G1 on my SRW as a trunk port and linked it to port 2 on my WRVS4400N (which is also set as a trunk).
So far no good when I go into LAN settings I do not see an option wheree I can set DHCP addresses or gateways for these VLAN(s). Is this even possible with the WRVS4400N I meen if Linksys is going to provide a small business solution atleast their equipment should support VLAN trunking with each other.
If anybody knows the solution to this please let me know.
CheersFrom what I know, although the WRVS4400N has support for port based VLAN setup, it does not give you the option to set different DHCP addresses for each of the 4 VLANS.
-
VLAN trunking newbie SRW208MP to SRW2008MP
Hello All,
Just need a simple setup - 2 VLANs, a few ports each, on each unit, trunked together (ultimately on SFP module). Tried what seems to be right but (natch) not working. Just need simple guidelines to see where am going wrong. Thanks!OK, well, using that example, as well as another thread here (Cisco SLM224P
VLAN TRUNKING), I reset and redid all the VLAN related settings.
There are 2 subnets in play here -
10.51.0.0/255.255.252.0 - VLAN 1 - Used as the Management VLAN.
10.51.4.0/255.255.255.0 - VLAN 5 - A subnet for Wireless LAN POE connection and management.
And 2 switches -
198 is a SRW208MP, remote unit. will have single WAP and various devices.
199 is a SRW2008MP, at head end near subnet(s) source. Will have up to 4 WAPs and the
connections required to provide for both subnets.
For purposes of discussion, the planned fiber SFP interconnect is being played by a copper trunk.
Setups follow:
198 VLANs-
198 Port Setting-
198 Ports to VLAN 1-
198 Ports to VLAN 5-
198 VLAN to Ports-
Unit 2 - 199
199 VLANs-
199 Port Settings-
199 Ports to VLAN 1-
199 Ports to VLAN 5-
199 VLAN to Ports-
The configuration as posted does not provide the expected results.
I am convinced I am overlooking something simple. Usually is!
The net results are that the Management VLAN (1) is present and accounted for on both switches, but that could even be because they are acting as switches do.
The VLAN 5, however, does not function at either end. The 'Local' switch, 199, shows traffic on the WAP ports but no traffic of any consequence is traversing and the WAPs are nonresponsive.
Ditto Remote switch. Management VLAN yes, 5 VLAN no.
Any suggestions greatly appreciated. -
Hi,
Im configuring a vlan trunk between 2 switches but I'm having a problem somehow.
Switch 1 a Cisco 3750G n
name: alrswcc00
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/28
description Uplink Alrswcc20
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-30
switchport mode trunk
end
Name: Gi1/0/28
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk private VLANs: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: 1-30
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Capture VLANs Allowed: ALL
Switch 2 a Cisco 2960S
name: alrswcc20
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/25
description Uplink Alrswcc00
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-30
switchport mode trunk
end
Name: Gi1/0/24
Switchport: Enabled
Administrative Mode: trunk
Operational Mode: trunk
Administrative Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Operational Trunking Encapsulation: dot1q
Negotiation of Trunking: On
Access Mode VLAN: 1 (default)
Trunking Native Mode VLAN: 10 (Inactive)
Administrative Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Voice VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan host-association: none
Administrative private-vlan mapping: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk native VLAN: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk Native VLAN tagging: enabled
Administrative private-vlan trunk encapsulation: dot1q
Administrative private-vlan trunk normal VLANs: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk associations: none
Administrative private-vlan trunk mappings: none
Operational private-vlan: none
Trunking VLANs Enabled: 10,20,30,40
Pruning VLANs Enabled: 2-1001
Capture Mode Disabled
Then lastly on switch 2 I created a port for an Ubiquiti access point with following settings.
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/24
switchport trunk native vlan 10
switchport trunk allowed vlan 10,20,30,40
switchport mode trunk
end
But my AP doesn't seem the get an IP. Where as if I plug it in on Switch 1 it does with the same settings.
So I am assuming there is something wrong with my trunk. What am I doing wrong?
Thank you,
MichaelHere are a couple of observations:
1. The switchport trunk encap dot1q command was not applied on the 2960 because 802.1q trunking is the default. The 2960 series switches do not support ISL encapsulation, as the OP observed. There is, therefore, no need to manually specify the trunking protocol. The show int g1/0/24 switchport command confirmed that trunking is working. I find the show int g1/0/24 trunk command to be more informative in this context. It tells you what VLANs are active and trunking between the connection.
2. You do need to define VLANS 2-30 on your second switch. You can do so manually or you can configure VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP). VTP is your easiest bet. Example config:
Switch 1
sw1(config)# vtp mode server
sw1(config)# vtp version 2
sw1(config)# vtp domain MY_DOMAIN
sw1(config)# vtp password MySecret
Issue a show vtp status in priv exce mode to very your settings.
Switch 2
sw2# show vtp status
Do this command FIRST and make sure that the configuration revision number is smaller than the revision number of SW1.
VTP Operating Mode : Client
Maximum VLANs supported locally : 255
Number of existing VLANs : 25
Configuration Revision : 174
If config revision on SW2 is greater than config revision of SW1, then issue following command:
SW2(config)# vtp domain bogus
SW2(config)# vtp domain MY_Domain
SW2(config)# do show vtp status
Your config revision should go back to zero.
Now issue the same commands on SW2.
SW2(config)# vtp version 2 (pretty sure that is default, but I issue it anyway)
SW2(config)# vtp mode client (means you cannot define VLANs on this switch. Most admins prefer that only one switch be capable of creating VLANs).
SW2(config)# do sh vtp status
The config revision was important because injecting a switch into your network that has a higher VTP revision can overwrite your existing VLAN database. If that happens, chances are that most of your network traffic will cease to function as all of your access ports will be in a VLAN mismatch mode. -
I have not been able to configure a VLAN trunk at a CE-500. I configure the port using CNA as router and specify the native VLAN, but I do not know where to specify the allowed VLANs. The port is connected to a Cisco Router with sub-interfaced configured. When I click on "modify" the smartport, an small windows quicky opens and closes, only leaving an option for the native VLAN. What am I doing wrong? How do I specify a port as a trunk port?
Thanks a lot for the help.
Juan SI believe you are aware of creating the standard Cisco IOS procedure for creating VLAN trunks.
under the interface configuration mode, in which you need to create a trunk,
switchport mode trunk
switchport mode trunk encapsulation isl/dot1q
switchport mode trunk native vlan
switchport mode trunk allowed vlans
But if you are already using these commands correctly, still you have the problem, I want you to let me know the following informations.
1. What error message you receive at the console while implementing trunking?
2. What is the other end device with which you are trying to establish trunk?. -
VLAN trunking from Cisco Catalyst 3750 to Cisco SF300-48P issue and related
Hello expert,
I'm having difficulties to configure VLAN trunking between Cisco Catalyst 3750 switch with Cisco SF300-48P switch and my workstation unable to get any DHCP IP from our DHCP server via Cisco SF300-48P switch. Below is the snippet of configuration on both switches:
[Cisco Catalyst 3750 Switch]
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/45
description NCC-CC-1stFlr
no switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
no switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-103
spanning-tree portfast
[Cisco SF300-48P Switch]
interface fastethernet48
spanning-tree link-type point-to-point
switchport trunk allowed vlan add 101-103
macro description switch
!next command is internal.
macro auto smartport dynamic_type switch
interface fastethernet29
switchport mode general
switchport general allowed vlan add 103 tagged
switchport general pvid 103
Are these are correct? Kindly advice!
Thank you very much!
Regards,
AlexHi Alex,
for the trunk port on Catalyst on port GE 1/0/45, we need to enable the trunk and for on encapsulation dot1q because this catalyst model is ISL capable also and the SF300 working only with Dot1q Encapsultion
The configuration on catalyst should :
#config terminal
#interface Gi 1/0/45
# switchport encapsulation
#switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
#switchport mode trunk
#switchport trunk allowed vlan 101-103
#spanning-tree portfast
For SF300 the port trunk it looks fine but for the port where the PC should receive an IP address
#interface fastethernet29
#switchport mode access
#switchport ccess vlan 103
Please let me know after this configuration
Thanks
Mehdi
Please rate or mark as answered to help other Cisco Customers -
SG200-08 VLAN-trunk setting ignored after reboot
Hi all,
The ports on my SG200-08 are configured as follows:
Port 1; VLAN 1+4; trunk
Port 2; VLAN 4; access
Port3-8; VLAN 1; access
The config for Port 1 looks as follows: "switchport trunk allowed vlan add 1,4". The problem I want to point out here arises right after rebooting the switch; in the running config, the aforementioned line is now present as "switchport trunk allowed vlan add 4", i.e., VLAN 1 is missing in the trunk. The problem is reproducible every time I reboot the switch. At this moment, I assume it to be a bug in the firmware. This is a problem for me, since the switch's management VLAN is 1 and it gets its IP address (DHCP) over VLAN 1 as well.
I have attached my startup config to this thread, as well as the running config exported right after reboot. In both of them, I've sanitized the rows on user accounts.
Does anyone recognize this problem? Any suggestions on how to fix it?Hi chrebert,
Thanks for your answer. You're right in concluding the VLAN 1 is my default VLAN. The problem is that the switch should contact my DHCP server over VLAN 1 and since the traffic on port 1 is not tagged, the traffic DHCP request will never reach my DHCP server. As a consequence, the switch always ends up with its factory default IP address (192.168.1.254) instead of the IP address assigned by the DHCP server. And yes, that's a problem
So to summarize, when I configure tagged access for VLAN 1 on port 1 and write this to the startup config, it is indeed present in the startup config afterwards. However, the switch ignores this upon reboot, causing VLAN 1 on port 1 to feature untagged access.
By the way, I completely set up the switch from scratch after restoring the config to factory defaults. It would be great if you could try to reproduce the issue and hopefully come with a fix. In case you need more information, please don't hesitate to contact me. -
Hello,
Looking for best practice setup for this network I have three buildings networked together at layer2 have three swiches 2x sg200-24
and one sg200-18. The middle building is the one with voip phones. On the other two buildings on each end I have pbx's that mark tos bit with '5'
and voip cards in pbx's do not have vlan capabilites nor mark dscp. However in the middle building the phones have vlan marking and dscp. So have successfully made communication with setting voip cards on port 2 in the end buildings untagged on vlan 10. and middle building tagged on vlan10 with vlan1 for downstream pc's hooked to phones (using trunks to phones) 10t 1U.
My question is how to implement qos. The equipment does not have lldp advertising? Ideas would be apprecitated. I should mention that my idea is to use the oui's. The voip cards are marking tos bit with value '5' but the again voip cards do not support dscp. Not clear on best method for this.
MikeHi Mike, the SG 200 supports LLDP med. Here's a document I wrote for the SX300
https://supportforums.cisco.com/docs/DOC-27005
It's pretty much identical to the SX200.
If you will keep the phones connected to a port and not move them, you can probably use the QoS function of the switch, manually set the QoS configuration on the port then over ride ingress DSCP (much more aggressive, but cool) which can be found on the Quality of Service tab.
-Tom
Please mark answered for helpful posts -
Hi,
I need some help setting up L3 Cisco 3560 for my VM lab. I have setup a few vlans and at this point I am trying to test out routing and connectivity. I came across with two issues and I am trying to get good advise from the experst since I am not
The Cisco 3560 is directly connected to my home router gi0/4 192.168.10.0/24 which would be my internet connection. The home router default gateway is 192.168.10.1.
I created Vlan192 on the 3560 to interact with the home router and get me to the outside world from the core. Obviously I'm doing something wrong here and came across 2 issues.
1- I tried setting Fas0/2 as trunk port and using the vlan226 on my pc but it wont work when I set this to my computer. It wont route to all vlans and I am not able to ping this 10.23.226.9 address from the 3560. The only way this works for me is if I set the IP to the 192 range which is my native Vlan, but anything other from 192 wont route.
PC IP address
10.23.226.9
255.255.255.0
10.23.226.254
Fas0/2 configurartion
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 192,224-229
switchport mode trunk
Please see my entire config below and maybe you can help since I am not an expert on this.
zeus-sw1#sh run
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5364 bytes
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
hostname zeus-sw1
boot-start-marker
boot-end-marker
no logging console
enable secret 5 $1$E9/L$UAOdxa6S.6QT52G2Lgcll0
enable
username admin1 privilege 15 secret 5 $1$hlCW$laTgSRIXF2LnZO.wyd0k0/
aaa new-model
aaa session-id common
system mtu routing 1500
vtp mode transparent
ip routing
crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-13407744
enrollment selfsigned
subject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-13407744
revocation-check none
rsakeypair TP-self-signed-13407744
crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-13407744
certificate self-signed 01
3082023D 308201A6 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030
2F312D30 2B060355 04031324 494F532D 53656C66 2D536967 6E65642D 43657274
69666963 6174652D 31333430 37373434 301E170D 39333033 30313030 31393031
5A170D32 30303130 31303030 3030305A 302F312D 302B0603 55040313 24494F53
2D53656C 662D5369 676E6564 2D436572 74696669 63617465 2D313334 30373734
3430819F 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 01050003 818D0030 81890281 8100BC82
4A857145 B3984EBF ED1553C2 E23AF1CF 60B5CB00 96984A72 CEC9F4CC 09CA7B8D
7416102A E630D17C 66716B57 DF7991AB 87DE6EBD DADE5539 F0278510 70BE7391
F2EC292D DF0C707A 70083E80 D19F4D3D 31462E89 5EE310EE 4976F764 AB1592C1
2A8EE610 C3B11D76 252568A7 2AE260B7 4C9141AB C8358A4A B76B94BF 6E970203
010001A3 69306730 0F060355 1D130101 FF040530 030101FF 30140603 551D1104
0D300B82 097A6575 732D7377 312E301F 0603551D 23041830 16801487 8F7A7E29
112BA5CC 42E2E9E0 0A9C5ACF 6CCBD330 1D060355 1D0E0416 0414878F 7A7E2911
2BA5CC42 E2E9E00A 9C5ACF6C CBD3300D 06092A86 4886F70D 01010405 00038181
0059DAD2 5601B324 2B1E4143 9CE67677 45100C44 DC21364D 175CB8F2 178B0EBC
D39D603F 8F896ADB 4CEEA493 13D8C028 F805F67B 9C7D6BA4 D195B7F3 FEED6763
F03F4575 B768C6FB 9A783232 DCC60120 9F72B78C 9B5C1B7A FD1C78D7 A3DF7BFE
483E46E6 7CA84A6C 95F37C63 BEA804F9 E535520E 629AE46E 0752BE69 42781471 21
quit
spanning-tree mode pvst
spanning-tree extend system-id
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
vlan 192
name NativeVlan
vlan 224
name iSCSI
vlan 225
name ESX_MGMT
vlan 226
name VM_SERVERS
vlan 227
name VMOTION
vlan 228
name VIEWDESKTOPS
vlan 229
name VCLOUD
lldp run
interface FastEthernet0/1
interface FastEthernet0/2
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 192
switchport trunk allowed vlan 192,224-229
switchport mode trunk
interface FastEthernet0/3
interface FastEthernet0/4
interface FastEthernet0/5
interface FastEthernet0/6
interface FastEthernet0/7
interface FastEthernet0/8
interface FastEthernet0/9
interface FastEthernet0/10
interface FastEthernet0/11
interface FastEthernet0/12
interface FastEthernet0/13
interface FastEthernet0/14
interface FastEthernet0/15
interface FastEthernet0/16
interface FastEthernet0/17
interface FastEthernet0/18
interface FastEthernet0/19
interface FastEthernet0/20
interface FastEthernet0/21
interface FastEthernet0/22
interface FastEthernet0/23
interface FastEthernet0/24
interface FastEthernet0/25
interface FastEthernet0/26
interface FastEthernet0/27
interface FastEthernet0/28
interface FastEthernet0/29
interface FastEthernet0/30
interface FastEthernet0/31
interface FastEthernet0/32
interface FastEthernet0/33
interface FastEthernet0/34
interface FastEthernet0/35
interface FastEthernet0/36
interface FastEthernet0/37
interface FastEthernet0/38
interface FastEthernet0/39
interface FastEthernet0/40
interface FastEthernet0/41
interface FastEthernet0/42
interface FastEthernet0/43
interface FastEthernet0/44
interface FastEthernet0/45
interface FastEthernet0/46
interface FastEthernet0/47
interface FastEthernet0/48
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
switchport trunk allowed vlan 192,224-229
interface GigabitEthernet0/3
interface GigabitEthernet0/4
description LINK SG200 UNTAGGED
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 192
switchport trunk allowed vlan 192,224-229
switchport mode trunk
interface Vlan1
no ip address
interface Vlan192
ip address 192.168.10.254 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan224
description iSCSI
ip address 10.23.224.254 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan225
description ESX
ip address 10.23.225.254 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan226
description VM_SERVERS
ip address 10.23.226.254 255.255.255.0
ip helper-address 10.23.226.2
interface Vlan227
description VIEWDESKTOPS
ip address 10.23.227.254 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan228
description vCloudDir
ip address 10.23.228.254 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan229
description SERVERS
ip address 10.23.229.254 255.255.255.0
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.10.1
ip http server
ip http authentication local
no ip http secure-server
endGlen,
Thanks for your advise. After changing the port as an access port I am able ping all vlans and my gateway from my home router 192.168.10.1, However a new issues came up. I am not able to get to the internet.
It seems it works from the 3560:
zeus-sw1#ping yahoo.com
Translating "yahoo.com"...domain server (255.255.255.255) [OK]
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 206.190.36.45, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/94/134 ms
zeus-sw1#
It wont work from my pc:
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::3d53:efc0:ea00:9bd2%3
IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 10.23.226.9
Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 10.23.226.254
Tunnel adapter Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:
Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
Tunnel adapter isatap.{461494F6-EA41-42CC-8B0A-B5BD2D8097DA}:
Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
C:\Users\user1>ping google.com
Ping request could not find host google.com. Please check the name and try agai
.C:\Users\user1>ping 14.2.2.2
Pinging 14.2.2.2 with 32 bytes of data:
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Request timed out.
Ping statistics for 14.2.2.2:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost = 4 (100% loss),
Maybe you are looking for
-
I've tried several times and it says the same thing. Is there something I can do differently? Also, I tried downloading it off of IE, but IE won't recognize my internet connection, so I can't even get to the website.
-
Weird behaviour at log creation and cleaning.
Hi All, One of our ReplicatedEnvironment is creating very small log files with very small % of utilization. The tree first columns represents the DbSpace output; where as the next columns represents part of the "ls -lh <envHome>/*.jdb" result. All ha
-
IMovie won't let me import videos from my library!
Hello, I own an iPad 2 running iOS5 Beta 3 and I have installed iMovie. I have noticed that when I try to open videos and fotos from my camera roll, they will show black. It only lets me shoot fotos from the built-in-app camera. What should I do? P.S
-
Wireless is ON but Satellite Pro A300-1EA says it's OFF
I have had this computer since April will no problems. My wireless is on (on switch and func key) but my computer will not connect to a network, the icon has a red cross through it and when I try and diagose I keep being told to switch wireless on. I
-
We've been using Contribute in our school district for over five years. Yesterday, out of the blue, we started getting reports from users about a message that "Contribute could not read the shared setting file for this website because the file has be