SG300-10mp Fibre Link aggregation

  Hi,
I have 2 SG300-10mp switches which i am trying to create a link redundancy for over the two fibre ports.
On the web interface when i go into the LAG settings ports g9 and g10 which are the fibre ones don't show up.
How do i create the link aggregation between them? Or perhaps i'm doing the wrong thing... All i require is the two switches to function as normal, however should one fibre port become faulty or the cable to break, the over port just takes over straight away with no latency, or atleast very minimal.
Please help!                

Hello Ashley,
I think I see where the confusion is here.
When you are looking at the LAG settings page, the 8 things you see listed represent the 8 possible LAGs that the switch can handle, the page actually looks exactly the same even with a 24 port switch.  You are seeing the LAGs themselves, not your individual switchports.
If you go to LAG management, you should be able to select one of those 8 LAGs and click the edit button.  The window that pops up should allow you to add both fiber ports to the LAG.  I don't have one of these in front of me right now, but since the SFP slots on the 300's are combo ports they will probably be numbered as whatever the ethernet port combo'ed to the SFP slot is.
Simply add the ports you would like to the LAG, and check LACP if you are using it on the other switch (you cannot change this setting later, you would have to delete the LAG first).
This way you have the redundancy you are looking over with the added benefit of having more throughput available between those two switches, since the traffic will be load-balanced across the LAG. 
A LAG will also failover much faster than two redundant links, since it won't have to go through the Spanning Tree process everytime a link state changes.
Like I said I don't have one of these in front of me right now, so if I messed something up let me know and I will try it in the lab tomorrow.
Let me know if you need any more information,
Christopher Ebert
Senior Network Support Engineer - Cisco Small Business Support Center
*Please rate helpful posts*

Similar Messages

  • Assistance needed with SG300-10 and QNAP TS-459 Pro II Link Aggregation

    All,
    As the subject specifies, I have a pair of devices on a local network that I would like to play nicely together.
    My problem:
    If the TS-459 is configured for standalone (No Link Aggregation), then I can access the NAS via Ping, web interface, NFS, etc.. however, If I try enabling Link Aggregation, then I lose TCP/IP connectivity to it and must use QNAP's Finder utility to change Link Aggregation mode back to Standalone.
    What I'm asking is - has anyone here configured a QNAP NAS appliance with Link Aggregation enabled with an SG300 or similar?? If so, could you kindly provide a walk-through on the appropriate settings for each?
    My first attempts on the NAS side were to choose the "Balance-alb" (automatic load balance) and "Balance-tlb" (adaptive transmit load balance) - The QNAP_Turbo_NAS_User_manual_V3.4_ENG.pdf states that these two modes are for "General Switches", so I assumed they should work.. unfortunately, no luck for me..
    Next up, I tried the IEEE 802.3ad / Link Aggregation setting on the NAS, while the device was rebooting, I configured the two GB ports on the SG300 to be a LAG with LACP enabled. Unfortunately, this too did not work as I had hoped.
    I called QNAP support and of course they don't have an Sg300-10 to test with, but will test their TS-459 Pro II to confirm the Link Aggregation settings function as advertised. I hope to hear back from them later this evening. In the meantime, if anyone here has insight, it would be very much appreciated. The NAS and SG300 are for a home lab consisting of a pair of Dual-six core systems with 48GB of mem each for vSphere.
    NAS Details:
    Model: QNAP TS-459 Pro II
    Firmware: 3.4.4 (0718T)
    Drives: Seagate 2TB x4
    Switch Details:
    Model: Cisco SG300-10
    Firmware version active image: 1.1.0.73
    Thank you,
    Burke

    Hi Burke,
    You can use link-aggregation 802.3AD with the sg-300. Try to make the trunk in the sg-300 with LACP enabled (before you make the trunk, otherwise LACP is disabled and you will only be able to do so by deleting the trunk and add it again). Flow control is enabled in the sg-300 (altough i'm not sure if this is needed). I've got the sg-300 and the QNAP TS 439 pro II+.

  • SG300-10MP keeps going down!!!

    Hello,
    We are in an organization of 80 users with 5 Sx300 series switches with the latest firmware (1.2.7.76). The network is mostly flat with all switches feeding into a Cisco ASA5505 acing as the primary gateway for Internet Access. Only our two 48 port POE switches have an additional vlan configured for the VoIP phones.
    We have one SG300-10MP that is powering 5 Cisco Aironet 1024N's that keeps crashing. A couple weeks ago it went down twice in one day. I updated the firmware and it did not have any hiccups unitl today. This issue has been consistent since we installed the switch in April. Originally the issue seemed to be caused by too much bonjour traffic causing a buffer overflow (we have over 100 Apple products). Since I updated the switch I have not seen any bonjour buffer overflow errors. Instead I get the following error when it crashes:
    2147424534 2012-Sep-05 15:12:28 Emergency %SYSLOG-F-OSFATAL: FATAL ERROR: tExcTask: ABORT DATA exception ***** FATAL ERROR ***** SW Version : 1.2.7.76 Version Date: 19-Jul-2012 Version Time: 17:54:43 Instruction 0x18 Exception vector 0x10 Program state register 0x80000092 %SNMP-I-CDBITEMSNUM: Number of startup configur ation items loaded: 133 %LINK-W-Down: gi1 %LINK-W-Down: gi2 %LINK-W-Down: gi3 %LINK-W-Down: gi4 %LINK-W-Down: gi5 %LINK-W-Down: gi6 %LINK-W-Down: gi7 %LINK-W-Down: gi8 %LINK-W-Down: gi9 %LINK-W-Down: gi10 %LINK-I-Up: gi9 %LINK-I-Up: Vlan 1 %LINK-I-Up: gi1 %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi9: STP status Fo
    The CPU and PoE supply are far from being overloaded. Can anyone tell me what this is and what it means? Can't seem to find anyone else with the same problem and it is extremely frusturating! Thanks in advance.

    I am still experiencing random restarts.  Having not heard anything lately I updated the firmware on the affected switches to
    1.2.7.76, and the number of restarts seems to have increased.  2 out of 3 of the affected switches also now seem to reboot themselves in tandem.
    Find log entries and *uncorresponding* uptime reports below.  This is now becoming a real problem for us.
    ==
    Cisco3:
    2147439844     2012-Jul-19 17:55:19    Informational     %SNMP-I-CDBITEMSNUM: Number of startup configuration items loaded: 435     
    2147440572     2012-Sep-25 23:20:30    Emergency     %SYSLOG-F-OSFATAL:   FATAL ERROR: tExcTask: ABORT DATA exception  ***** FATAL ERROR *****  SW Version  :  1.2.7.76 Version Date:  19-Jul-2012 Version  Time:  17:54:43 Instruction            0x18 Exception vector       0x10 Program state register 0x80000092 %SNMP-I-CDBITEMSNUM: Number of startup configur ation items loaded: 435 %LINK-W-Down:  fa1 %LINK-W-Down:  fa2 %LINK-I-Up:  fa3 %LINK-W-Down:  fa4 %LINK-I-Up:  fa5 %LINK-W-Down:  fa6 %LINK-W-Down:  fa7   %LINK-W-Down:  fa8 %LINK-I-Up:  fa9 %LINK-W-Down:  fa10 %LINK-W-Down:  fa11 %LINK-W-Down:  fa12 %LINK-W-Down:  fa13 %LINK-I-Up:  fa14 %LINK-W-Down:  fa1
    2147440752     2012-Sep-25 17:46:59    Informational     %AAA-I-DISCONNECT: https connection for user apsoladmin, source 192.168.24.2 destination 192.168.24.13 TERMINATED     
    2147440878     2012-Sep-25 17:46:48    Notice     %COPY-N-TRAP: The copy operation was completed successfully     
    2147441039     2012-Sep-25 17:46:43    Informational     %COPY-I-FILECPY: Files Copy - source URL running-config destination URL flash://startup-config     
    2147441163     2012-Sep-25 17:46:31    Notice     %SYSLOG-N-LOGGINGFILE: configure file logging level to 7.     
    2147441991     2012-Jul-19 23:22:40    Emergency     %SYSLOG-F-OSFATAL:   FATAL ERROR: tExcTask: ABORT DATA exception  ***** FATAL ERROR *****  SW Version  :  1.2.7.76 Version Date:  19-Jul-2012 Version  Time:  17:54:43 Instruction            0x18 Exception vector       0x10 Program state register 0x80000092 ***** END OF FATAL ERROR *****     
    System Uptime:     0 day(s), 1 hr(s), 6 min(s) and 21 sec(s)    
    Current Time:     09:18:55;2012-Sep-26
    ========
    Cisco1:
    2147429792     2012-Jul-19 17:55:29    Informational     %SNMP-I-CDBITEMSNUM: Number of startup configuration items loaded: 524     
    2147430520     2012-Sep-26 06:16:17    Emergency     %SYSLOG-F-OSFATAL:   FATAL ERROR: tExcTask: ABORT DATA exception  ***** FATAL ERROR *****  SW Version  :  1.2.7.76 Version Date:  19-Jul-2012 Version  Time:  17:54:43 Instruction            0x18 Exception vector       0x10 Program state register 0x80000092 %SNMP-I-CDBITEMSNUM: Number of startup configur ation items loaded: 524 %LINK-W-Down:  fa1 %LINK-W-Down:  fa2 %LINK-W-Down:  fa3 %LINK-W-Down:  fa4 %LINK-W-Down:  fa5 %LINK-W-Down:  fa6 %LINK-W-Down:   fa7 %LINK-W-Down:  fa8 %LINK-W-Down:  fa9 %LINK-W-Down:  fa10 %LINK-W-Down:  fa11 %LINK-W-Down:  fa12 %LINK-W-Down:  fa13 %LINK-W-Down:  fa14 %LINK-W-Do
    2147430637     2012-Sep-25 23:21:42    Debug     %IGMPHOST-D-IP: IGMP Packet with unknown source IP     
    2147430749     2012-Sep-25 23:21:31    Warning     %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi3: STP status Forwarding     
    2147430832     2012-Sep-25 23:21:29    Informational     %LINK-I-Up:  gi3     
    2147430917     2012-Sep-25 23:21:27    Warning     %LINK-W-Down:  gi3     
    2147431029     2012-Sep-25 23:21:19    Warning     %STP-W-PORTSTATUS: gi3: STP status Forwarding      
    System Uptime:     0 day(s), 1 hr(s), 22 min(s) and 10 sec(s)    
    Current Time:     09:34:46;2012-Sep-26
    Please advise.

  • How can I set a right link Aggregations?

    I have a Enterprise T5220 server, running Solaris 10 that I am using as a backup server. On this server, I have a Layer 4, LACP-enabled link aggregation set up using two of the server's Gigabit NICs (e1000g2 and e1000g3) and until recently I was getting up to and sometimes over 1.5 Gb/s as desired. However, something has happened recently to where I can now barely get over 1 Gb/s. As far as I know, no patches were applied to the server and no changes were made to the switch that it's connected to (Nortel Passport 8600 Series) and the total amount of backup data sent to the server has stayed fairly constant. I have tried setting up the aggregation multiple times and in multiple ways to no avail. (LACP enabled/disabled, different policies, etc.) I've also tried using different ports on the server and switch to rule out any faulty port problems. Our networking guys assure me that the aggregation is set up correctly on the switch side but I can get more details if needed.
    In order to attempt to better troubleshoot the problem, I run one of several network speed tools (nttcp, nepim, & iperf) as the "server" on the T5220, and I set up a spare X2100 as a "client". Both the server and client are connected to the same switch. The first set of tests with all three tools yields roughly 600 Mb/s. This seems a bit low to me, I seem to remember getting 700+ Mb/s prior to this "issue". When I run a second set of tests from two separate "client" X2100 servers, coming in on two different Gig ports on the T5220, each port also does ~600 Mb/s. I have also tried using crossover cables and I only get maybe a 50-75 Mb/s increase. After Googling Solaris network optimizations, I found that if I double tcp_max_buf to 2097152, and set tcp_xmit_hiwat & tcp_recv_hiwat to 524288, it bumps up the speed of a single Gig port to ~920 Mb/s. That's more like it!
    Unfortunately however, even with the TCP tweaks enabled, I still only get a little over 1 Gb/s through the two aggregated Gig ports. It seems as though the aggregation is only using one port, though MRTG graphs of the two switch ports do in fact show that they are both being utilized equally, essentially splitting the 1 Gb/s speed between
    the two ports.
    Problem with the server? switch? Aggregation software? All the above? At any rate, I seem to be missing something.. Any help regarding this issue would be greatly appreciated!
    Regards,
    sundy
    Output of several commands on the T5220:
    uname -a:
    SunOS oitbus1 5.10 Generic_137111-07 sun4v sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise-T5220
    ifconfig -a (IP and broadcast hidden for security):
    lo0: flags=2001000849 mtu 8232 index 1
    inet 127.0.0.1 netmask ff000000
    aggr1: flags=1000843 mtu 1500 index 2
    inet x.x.x.x netmask ffffff00 broadcast x.x.x.x
    ether 0:14:4f:ec:bc:1e
    dladm show-dev:
    e1000g0 link: unknown speed: 0 Mbps duplex: half
    e1000g1 link: unknown speed: 0 Mbps duplex: half
    e1000g2 link: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full
    e1000g3 link: up speed: 1000 Mbps duplex: full
    dladm show-link:
    e1000g0 type: non-vlan mtu: 1500 device: e1000g0
    e1000g1 type: non-vlan mtu: 1500 device: e1000g1
    e1000g2 type: non-vlan mtu: 1500 device: e1000g2
    e1000g3 type: non-vlan mtu: 1500 device: e1000g3
    aggr1 type: non-vlan mtu: 1500 aggregation: key 1
    dladm show-aggr:
    key: 1 (0x0001) policy: L4 address: 0:14:4f:ec:bc:1e (auto) device address speed
    duplex link state
    e1000g2 0:14:4f:ec:bc:1e 1000 Mbps full up attached
    e1000g3 1000 Mbps full up attached
    dladm show-aggr -L:
    key: 1 (0x0001) policy: L4 address: 0:14:4f:ec:bc:1e (auto) LACP mode: active LACP timer: short
    device activity timeout aggregatable sync coll dist defaulted expired
    e1000g2 active short yes yes yes yes no no
    e1000g3 active short yes yes yes yes no no
    dladm show-aggr -s:
    key: 1 ipackets rbytes opackets obytes %ipkts %opkts
    Total 464982722061215050501612388529872161440848661
    e1000g2 30677028844072327428231142100939796617960694 66.0 59.5
    e1000g3 15821243372049177622000967520476 64822888149 34.0 40.5

    sundy.liu wrote:
    Unfortunately however, even with the TCP tweaks enabled, I still only get a little over 1 Gb/s through the two aggregated Gig ports. It seems as though the aggregation is only using one port, though MRTG graphs of the two switch ports do in fact show that they are both being utilized equally, essentially splitting the 1 Gb/s speed between
    the two ports.
    Problem with the server? switch? Aggregation software? All the above? At any rate, I seem to be missing something.. Any help regarding this issue would be greatly appreciated!If you're only running a single stream, that's all you'll see. Teaming/aggregating doesn't make one stream go faster.
    If you ran two streams simultaneously, then you should see a difference between a single 1G interface and an aggregate of two 1G interfaces.
    Darren

  • How to set up Link Aggregation on Windows 7 ?

    I am going to buy a new Switcher that is LACP (Link Aggregation Control Protocol) supported so I can get a little bit better internet by combining my two ethernet ports on my MacPro (Mid 2012) where i have Windows 7 Ultimate installed as well as Mac OSx. On Mac OSx it is easy to set up Link Aggregation takes only 30 sec by going to Manage Virtual Interfaces and click round (for doing this you need a Link Aggregation supported router or switcher), but on Windows it seems to be a little bit harder after looking around for a while now. Is there anyone here who knows how to do it or know if its possible to set up Link Aggregation on Windows 7 ?
    I'll be thankful for any help i can get

    hehe I thought over that too
    But since I dont got a windows forum account I thought of asking here fisrst

  • Mac Mini Server Link aggregation - Thunderbolt or USB 3 gigabit ethernet adaptors

    I am setting up a late 2012 Mac Mini as a file server with Server 2.2. It has a Promise Pegasus R4 RAID and LaCie 4TB drives daisy chained via the Thunderbolt connection. 4 users on MacPro's will connect to the server to access these hard drives via gigabit ethernet.
    I imagine the gigabit ethernet will be the bottleneck, so I'm now looking at link aggregation. Not a problem on the MacPro's but the Mac Mini will require an adaptor to get a second gigabit port. From reading this forum I understand the Apple Thunderbolt to Gigabit adaptor will work, but I'm concerned that it will need to be fitted 3rd in line after the R4 and LaCie drives. The 10Gbps bandwidth Thunderbolt has, may cause another bottleneck with all three working off the same port?
    An option would be to use one of the USB 3 ports with this adaptor http://www.ebuyer.com/412005-startec...edium=products
    I believe it work with OSX, but I have no speed information or if OSX link aggregation will work using it.
    Any thoughts on the above would be appreciated and recommendations on a suitable Network Switch with LACP support welcome.

    At present Mountain Lion Server cannot use a LACP bond, in my experience only of course. http://www.small-tree.com/kb_results.asp?ID=59 describes LACP/Bonds do not show up in Server Admin GUI on Mountain Lion
    anyone know how to do it? or the location and the name of the plist file to configure the network interface in ML server?
    regards

  • Link aggregation

    Hello,
    I have a new Mac Pro specifically dedicated as a security camera server and am wondering if I should implement the use of two Ethernet ports and/or link aggregation. Here is the rest of the story...
    My Mac Pro 3.06 GHz 12-core Intel Xeon computer corrdinates twelve network megapixel sercurity cameras. The network configuration now that the Mac Pro is simply linked into the only network that everything else in my home is via one main 10/100/1000 switch. This same network also hosts four other wired Macs, two HDMI-Cat6-HDMI channels, and a variety of other wired/wireless items that need Internet access. A brief test shows that my new Mac Pro does the job just fine under this plan. Isn't that what a network switch is supposed to do; juggle multiple data streams without them colliding or interfearing with one another? Regardless, I haven't tried to take any diagnostic readings or done any comparisons. I have further found little information from Apple on the use of two Ethernet ports.
    So, any suggestions here? Maybe it would be good to have all of my cameras on one Network with the Mac Pro, since it is the one that coordinates all the video data. However, downstream access to all of that data via the main household Network and the Internet would be resticted. This is unless I can use both Networks at the same time. Like I said, I am finding little information to even start designing a Network with these two Enetrnet ports.
    More microchips than sense,
    Dr. Z.

    Link Aggregation uses a slightly different protocol. It is different enough that the Mac will only commit both its Ethernet ports when the equipment you are connecting to explicitly supports Link Aggregation Protocol. (certain high-end Switches do this, but most consumer equipment does not.)
    The Mac can use such an Aggregated link once established, but it does not do load-balancing unless there are multiple virtual connections. If you have only one data stream, it will be routed over one side of the aggregate link and will not benefit from having the other side present unless other connections to other places were using the same aggregate link..
    So I think that if you are taking advantage of Gigabit Ethernet, you are doing fine. Link Aggregation is available, but it is really solving a problem you do not have in a way that does not benefit you.
    Have you checked the actual speed in Network Utility to make sure you really are connecting at Gigabit speeds?
    I some times set these up with manual speed so that they connect quickly at the speed I specify (with flow control) instead of auto-speed.

  • Cant get link aggregation working on srw2048

    Hello
    We are trying to setup link aggregation between 2 nodes in our cluster. They are 64 bit nodes running Opensuse 11.1 and are connected by Gigabit Ethernet. We have an srw2048 switch.
    The problem is we are not able to see any performance improvement in network bandwidth after the configuration. We seem to have configured the nodes correctly: ifconfig shows something like this on both nodes, where eth4, eth5 are slaves to bond0 :
    bond0     Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:68:78:F9:84  
          inet addr:192.168.1.198  Bcast:192.168.1.255  Mask:255.255.255.0
          inet6 addr: fe80::21e:68ff:fe78:f984/64 Scope:Link
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING MASTER MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:40443248 errors:442 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:442
          TX packets:30955485 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 
          RX bytes:31836352423 (30361.5 Mb)  TX bytes:31997996320 (30515.6 Mb)
    eth4      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:68:78:F9:84  
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:6213 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
          TX packets:15477741 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:1290977 (1.2 Mb)  TX bytes:16000747443 (15259.5 Mb)
          Interrupt:246 Base address:0xe000 

eth5      Link encap:Ethernet  HWaddr 00:1E:68:78:F9:84  
          UP BROADCAST RUNNING SLAVE MULTICAST  MTU:1500  Metric:1
          RX packets:40437035 errors:442 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:442
          TX packets:15477744 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
          collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 
          RX bytes:31835061446 (30360.2 Mb)  TX bytes:15997248877 (15256.1 Mb)
          Interrupt:247 Base address:0x4000
    Starting the network services shows
     bond0     
    bond0     enslaved interface: eth5
    bond0     enslaved interface: eth4
    bond0     (DHCP) . . IP/Netmask: '192.168.1.198' / '255.255.255.0'
    So it seems that the client side configuration is correct. The bond has been configured with the default mode balance-rr.
    On the switch side, we have grouped the right ports to form LAG groups and have checked LACP on them. Running some trusted TCP benchmarks yields the same results as the original configuration without link aggregation.
    I feel we are missing some configuration on the switch side.
    Can anybody point out what we are doing wrong?
    Thanks,
    K**bleep**ij

    If you think this has been a mis-configuration on the switch side, please try to reset the switch and then re-configure it again. You may also seek assistance with a Cisco/Linksys tech support so that they can guide you step by step at real time.

  • Link Aggregation: LGS318P Switch and LRT214 Router

    The manual for my LGS318P is a little confusing (perhaps because I'm relatively new at more advanced features of networking).
    I have an LRT214 router that I'm now routing all traffic through my LGS318P in the basement.  From there it goes to multiple locations in the house, WAP's, etc.  Currently, port 17 of the LGS318P connects to LAN1 of my LRT214 router.  LAN2-4 are unused.
    I would like to create a link aggregation for ports 17 and 18 to LAN1 and LAN2 of my router for both redundancy as well as possible speed improvement.
    What is the best way to do this?  Do I simply edit LAG1, place GE17 and GE18 as LAG port members, and select LACP to enable?  Will that automatically set things up?
    I don't want to do this then lose connectivity to my switch to reverse things.
    Also, how many ports can be aggregated?  Can I use 4 ports on the switch to the 4 LAN ports on the router?
    What about the flow control option? Should that be disabled (default setting), enabled, or auto?
    Thanks for all the help anyone can provide!

    I also found something from the Linksys website for your consumption. I provides additional information about the rules of setting up LAC. The link is located at:
    http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=986c6706bc7649b686850c5a26855a8f_15746.xml&pid=80&...
    I hope it helps.

  • Dual wireless/ Load Balancing/ Link Aggregation

    Hi all,
    I've been reading up on this topic all day, with multiple Google and Apple searches, but haven't found the exact answer to this query. There was another post on this forum http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1660762 which was vaguely similar.
    Basically I'm looking to experiment with combining 2 wireless connections, and therefore 2 seperate internet connections into one Mac.
    I have seen suggestions of using a couple of wireless -> ethernet bridges, since Leopard supports Link Aggregation of ethernet devices. But the first question I have is: since I use a 3rd party wireless adaptor (Netgear wg111v3 USB dongle), it already shows up in Network Preferences as an Ethernet port. Leopard treats it as an actual ethernet device, hence is oblivious to the fact it is a wireless adaptor. Since Leopard thinks it's an ethernet port, could I use a second wireless dongle and then use Link Aggregation on them both?
    Additionally, if that idea were to work, would it then be possible to connect each wireless adaptor to a seperate wireless network, or would they both have to connect to the same access point?
    My DSL connection is roughly 512k on a good day, but I find this bandwidth to be choked when someone else at home is streaming videos etc. So in principle my idea was to have one connection using the regular DSL line as usual, plus connect the secondary wireless to my friend's wireless over the road when needed (and yes he's already agreed to my use since he rarely accesses the net). Therefore, giving a total theoretical bandwidth of 512k x2.
    Since I aim for a load-balancing idea (spreading traffic over both connections), the main issue I can forsee is that this Mac will have problems routing traffic with both IPs since I read somewhere else that DNS problems might occur.It seems relatively easy to use Terminal to add a default route for specific destinations (e.g. all traffic to apple.com out of one interface, all traffic to yahoo.com out the other). However, I wondered if web traffic could be forwarded out one connection, whilst email traffic goes through the other. Alternatively, it would be great if web traffic could be "halved" and sent out both wireless connections simultaneously, though I don't think there's an easy way to do this (it would just be a nice feature if possible).
    Your thoughts and advice on the matter would be much appreciated, and I'm going to continue experimenting with various ideas and see what I come up with.

    Hi all,
    I've been reading up on this topic all day, with multiple Google and Apple searches, but haven't found the exact answer to this query. There was another post on this forum http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?threadID=1660762 which was vaguely similar.
    Basically I'm looking to experiment with combining 2 wireless connections, and therefore 2 seperate internet connections into one Mac.
    I have seen suggestions of using a couple of wireless -> ethernet bridges, since Leopard supports Link Aggregation of ethernet devices. But the first question I have is: since I use a 3rd party wireless adaptor (Netgear wg111v3 USB dongle), it already shows up in Network Preferences as an Ethernet port. Leopard treats it as an actual ethernet device, hence is oblivious to the fact it is a wireless adaptor. Since Leopard thinks it's an ethernet port, could I use a second wireless dongle and then use Link Aggregation on them both?
    Additionally, if that idea were to work, would it then be possible to connect each wireless adaptor to a seperate wireless network, or would they both have to connect to the same access point?
    My DSL connection is roughly 512k on a good day, but I find this bandwidth to be choked when someone else at home is streaming videos etc. So in principle my idea was to have one connection using the regular DSL line as usual, plus connect the secondary wireless to my friend's wireless over the road when needed (and yes he's already agreed to my use since he rarely accesses the net). Therefore, giving a total theoretical bandwidth of 512k x2.
    Since I aim for a load-balancing idea (spreading traffic over both connections), the main issue I can forsee is that this Mac will have problems routing traffic with both IPs since I read somewhere else that DNS problems might occur.It seems relatively easy to use Terminal to add a default route for specific destinations (e.g. all traffic to apple.com out of one interface, all traffic to yahoo.com out the other). However, I wondered if web traffic could be forwarded out one connection, whilst email traffic goes through the other. Alternatively, it would be great if web traffic could be "halved" and sent out both wireless connections simultaneously, though I don't think there's an easy way to do this (it would just be a nice feature if possible).
    Your thoughts and advice on the matter would be much appreciated, and I'm going to continue experimenting with various ideas and see what I come up with.

  • Link Aggregation ... almost there!

    Hi all
    After struggling with Link Aggregation on Mac OS X Server to Extreme X450 switches we are almost there. We've now managed to get a live working link where the Ethernet 1 and 2 arew green and the Bond0 shows both links as active, and finally the Bond0 interface picks up a DHCP address.
    So that's great, but no Network connection which is weird because it got an IP address.
    Do we have to route the traffic over one of the other interfaces or something?
    Any suggestions at all?
    Cheers
    C

    Camelot wrote:
    The first, or at least - most obvious, problem is that you have IP addresses assigned to each of en0 and en1.
    This should not be the case. Only the bond0 network should have an IP address assigned.
    The other interfaces should not be configured at all. That's almost certainly the issue since your machine has three IP addresses in the same subnet - one on each of en0, en1 and bond0. It's no wonder things are confused
    Thanks that now works a treat!
    Was hoping you could help on another set of ports again being configured for Link Aggregation. We have tried to set it up in exactly the same way but again its not working. The ifconfig returns back the following:
    lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
    inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1
    inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000
    inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
    gif0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1280
    stf0: flags=0 mtu 1280
    en0: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,SMART,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
    inet6 fe80::219:e3ff:fee7:5706%en0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4
    inet 169.254.102.66 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 169.254.255.255
    ether 00:19:e3:e7:57:07
    media: autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex,flow-control>) status: active
    supported media: autoselect 10baseT/UTP <half-duplex> 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex,hw-loopback> 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex,flow-control> 100baseTX <half-duplex> 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX <full-duplex,hw-loopback> 100baseTX <full-duplex,flow-control> 1000baseT <full-duplex> 1000baseT <full-duplex,hw-loopback> 1000baseT <full-duplex,flow-control>
    en1: flags=8863<UP,BROADCAST,SMART,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
    inet6 fe80::219:e3ff:fee7:5707%en1 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5
    inet 169.254.102.66 netmask 0xffff0000 broadcast 169.254.255.255
    ether 00:19:e3:e7:57:07
    media: autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex,flow-control>) status: active
    supported media: autoselect 10baseT/UTP <half-duplex> 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex,hw-loopback> 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex,flow-control> 100baseTX <half-duplex> 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX <full-duplex,hw-loopback> 100baseTX <full-duplex,flow-control> 1000baseT <full-duplex> 1000baseT <full-duplex,hw-loopback> 1000baseT <full-duplex,flow-control>
    fw0: flags=8822<BROADCAST,SMART,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 2030
    lladdr 00:1b:63:ff:fe:6e:6c:8a
    media: autoselect <full-duplex> status: inactive
    supported media: autoselect <full-duplex>
    bond0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
    ether 00:19:e3:e7:57:07
    media: autoselect status: inactive
    supported media: autoselect
    bond interfaces: en1 en0
    When I compared this to the working Link Aggregation ifconfig output I noticed this one has the line "media: autoselect status: inactive" as appose to active. Could this be the cause and how do I rectify it?
    Thanks

  • Strange behaviors from SG300-10MP

    Hi, everyone.  Was hoping to get some advice and assistance regarding two issues with a brand new SG300-10MP our company recently bought.
    1.  I've been having difficulty getting a proper trunk port to work on this, as compared to the Cisco Catalyst 2960's.  My office has temporarily been relocated to another space in our building.  The core switch in this side of the building is a 2960 series.  This room has a single network jack in it.  That jack is plugged into the 2960 directly on a trunk port with no explicit vlans as native, allowed or disallowed.  Pretty much the config of the port is "Switchport mode trunk" and that's it.  I'm sharing this space with another person on the IT team and we both have multiple computers and VoIP phones, so we've placed a NetGear FS726TP switch in here that has 12 PoE ports (for the VoIP phones) and 12 non-PoE for everything else.  Port 25 on this switch appears to be configured as a trunk port with all VLANs being tagged.  The VLANs on this switch are (1, 3, 6, 10, 11, 1001 and 2).  VLAN 6 is for PC's, 11 is for VoIP phones, 1001 is for management, and 1 is the default VLAN and also is the PVID for port 25.  Everything plugged into the NetGear is working as expected.  The SG300-10MP's port 9 is plugged into the NetGear's port 26.  I've configured port 26 identically to port 25, so as far as the NetGear is concerned, that should be a trunk port.  I've attempted to configure the SG300-10MP's port 9 as a trunk, but I've found that first I need to manually create all my VLANs on it that I want to use on the switch (in this case, 1, 6, 10, 11 and 1001), and then for the trunk to actually work as expected, I have to explicitly allow the VLAN's on port 9 ("switchport trunk allowed vlan add all").  I've configured GE1-8 to be access ports on VLAN 6.  The strange thing is, every 5 minutes I get this message on the console: "%CDP-W-NATIVE_VLAN_MISMATCH: Native VLAN mismatch detected on interface gi9."  This only occurs if I have a computer plugged into GE1 on the SG300.  The computer also has a second connection into the NetGear, so I suspect it might be an issue with spanning tree, although how the switch is communicating through my PC is unknown.  When I first unboxed the SG300 and plugged my computer into a port, it was grabbing a valid DHCP address for VLAN 6 somehow through my PC.  Does anyone have any idea why I keep getting this?  I'd done a "sh cdp n detail" and this is what it gives me:
    Device-ID: 2960-06-TrunkSw5590.XXXX.XXXXX.local
    Advertisement version: 2
    Platform: cisco WS-C2960S-24TS-S
    Capabilities: Switch IGMP
    Interface: gi9, Port ID (outgoing port): GigabitEthernet0/15
    Holdtime: 151
    Version: Cisco IOS Software, C2960S Software (C2960S-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 12.2(55)SE5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Co
    Duplex: full
    Native VLAN: 1
    SysObjectID: 0.0
    VTP Management Domain: XXX
    Primary Management Address: IP 10.100.100.125,
    Addresses:
              IP 10.100.100.125
    Device-ID: SEP08000F77571D
    Advertisement version: 2
    Platform: Mitel 5330e,DN 2890
    Capabilities: Host Phone
    Interface: gi9, Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
    Holdtime: 125
    Version: M6020006
    Duplex: full
    Power drawn: 6100 milliwatts
    SysObjectID: 0.0
    Addresses:
              IP 10.2.2.60
    Device-ID: SEP08000F8E7773
    Advertisement version: 2
    Platform: Mitel 5330e,DN 2643
    Capabilities: Host Phone
    Interface: gi9, Port ID (outgoing port): Port 1
    Holdtime: 125
    Version: M6020006
    Duplex: full
    Power drawn: 6100 milliwatts
    SysObjectID: 0.0
    Addresses:
              IP 10.2.2.25
    Device-ID: 5067ae3ccc29
    Advertisement version: 2
    Platform: Cisco SG300-10MP (PID:SRW2008MP-K9)-VSD
    Capabilities: Switch IGMP
    Interface: gi9, Port ID (outgoing port): gi1
    Holdtime: 121
    Version: 1.3.5.58
    Duplex: full
    Native VLAN: 6
    SysName: switch3ccc29
    SysObjectID: 0.0
    Addresses:
              IP 10.200.1.55        (this is the IP for Management of the SG300 on VLAN1001)
    So, CDP appears to be working, seeing itself, the two VoIP phones and the core switch, but getting nothing from the NetGear (obviously).  The Native VLAN on the core switch is 1 and the PVIDs on both trunk ports on the NetGear are also 1, the default VLAN on the NetGear is 1, all packets are tagged on ports 25 and 26, and I've even set GE9 on the SG300 as native vlan 1, but still getting these errors.  Is this just a warning that's being caused by having that NetGear between the two Cisco switches or something else?
    2.  Whenever I make any changes to the VLANs on the switch from the command line, it always gives me this message:  "Please ensure that the port through which the device is managed has the proper settings and is a member of the new management interface.  Would you like to apply this new configuration? (Y/N)[N]"  As mentioned above, VLAN 1001 is our management VLAN and I've assigned IP address 10.200.1.55, subnet mask 255.255.255.0 to interface VLAN1001.  After I set that, if I make any changes to the VLANs, whether it be adding a new VLAN interface, or changing the IP address or removing an IP address, I'll get that message, choose "YES", and then I'll lose all IP connectivity to the rest of the VLAN1001 subnet.  I look at the config and even if I was working with a VLAN other than 1001, the IP address I assigned to interface VLAN1001 will be gone.  Also, the default gateway will be removed.  So, every time I make any change to the VLANs, I have to go and re-do these things.  Is this normal behavior for the configuration to blow itself up like this?
    Help!

    Looks like Cisco small business products dont support the cisco network assistant. I have tried the web console with both Internet Explorer and Firefox.

  • Best Switch to use for Link Aggregation

    Looking to buy a new switch and was hoping that someone is already doing link aggregation on a current switch. Looking for 48 ports, I have a lot of Xserves.
    What model have you had the best luck with? THX

    Switches are like so many other things in life - you get what you pay for.
    Sometimes you can pay less and get enough (i.e. it works well enough)
    Sometimes you can pay less and not know what you're missing (you don't know what some of those advanced features are anyway, even though they could be useful)
    Sometimes you pay more and get features you don't need/want/understand
    Sometimes you find just the right option.
    Start off by determining the importance to your business. If the switch blows out and all your servers go dark, how much will that cost you if it takes an hour to get it back up? 4 hours? a minute?
    Look also at how much traffic you're pushing through your network. If you just need ports but aren't pushing many packets then a cheaper switch may suffice, but if you need every port to run at full line rate with no packet drops then you need something bigger.
    Do you need the switch to just pass traffic, or do you want statistics (e.g. SNMP, RMON, etc.) so you can track which ports are busiest?
    Then, of course, there's a budget. It could be $100. It could be $10,000. Your options are limited at $100, but $10K will cover a lot of options.
    While you're doing this, consider expansion room. Are you likely to need more ports soon? Are 48 ports enough? Maybe a chassis-based switch that's expandable would be a better option.
    At the high end you might consider anything from Cisco. Their Catalyst range of switches are the workhorses of many networks. They also come with a matching price tag.
    Other options worth considering at the higher end would be Force 10's. Force 10 is known for their 10-gigabit network equipment, but their S Series switches are a powerful play.
    Then there's Juniper's EX range. Juniper are known more for their routing platform (I guarantee most of your internet traffic goes through a Juniper router at some point), but their switches are a natural progression.
    Coming down the line a little, look at Brocade's FastIron switches. Formerly Foundry Networks (before they got bought out), I" ve used (and continue to use) their switches in my network. If all those are above your price bracket then HP ProCurve switches are worth a look.
    All of the above still may do more than you need, though. If all you really, really want is link aggregation and don't care about the rest then I'd probably go for a NetGear over the other lower-end players such as D-Link or LinkSys (even though LinkSys is now owned by Cisco).

  • Link Aggregation and OS X Server

    Hello.
    I'm moving my servers (3 x Intel Xserves running 10.5.6) to a new location with all new network hardware (wiring, switches, routers, etc.) and I'm now considering using link aggregation on the Xserves (the previous switches didn't support it while the new ones do) — but, since I'm working with servers which are already set up I'm concerned I might "break" services by moving to link aggregation. I've concerned that services which are bound to a specific network connection/port will fail when setting up link aggregation (for example, an Open Directory setup as OD Master).
    Does anyone have any experience with this? I've read that with OD you have to revert back to an Standalone setup before setting up link aggregation, but I've only seen this mentioned once on other forums (and have never seen it confirmed anywhere).
    Anyway, if anyone has any experience/advice/etc. it'd be much appreciated!
    Regards,
    Kristin.

    To add to that question, do I just have to set the link aggregation in the Network interfaces preferences of the X-Serves or do we also have to set the Switches (through their administration interfaces) to be prepared for link-aggregation?

  • Link Aggregation dladm on T2000 with 2 e1000g. How can i change mtu size

    Hello
    I made a Link Aggregation on a T2000 with e1000g1 & e1000g2 successfully.
    Now i want to raise up the mtu size to mtu 9000 for the aggregation.
    I tried /etc/hostname.aggr
    mtu 9000
    unsuccessfully- MTU size still 1500
    /kernel/drv/etc/e1000g.conf
    setting Max Fram Size for 1 2 3 interface to 2(upto 8k)
    also not successfully
    MaxFrameSize=0,2,2,2;
    # 0 is for normal ethernet frames.
    # 1 is for upto 4k size frames.
    # 2 is for upto 8k size frames.
    # 3 is for upto 16k size frames.
    # These are maximum frame limits, not the actual ethernet frame
    # size. Your actual ethernet frame size would be determined by
    # protocol stack configuration (please refer to ndd command man pages)
    # For Jumbo Frame Support (9k ethernet packet)
    # use 3 (upto 16k size frames)
    Has someone an idea?
    thanx for advice

    Bug is described:
    http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-1-6326664-1
    Solution is
    T-Patch 125020-01
    Message was edited by:
    sunibk

Maybe you are looking for

  • Help with Resolution/Document Raster Effects

    I am wanting to upload my logo to my credit card company to put on the face of my new card. obviously this will be small in size (1.5"x3") but the cc company requires the upload be at least 400pixels x 400pixels. I don't want to upload a 13"x6" becau

  • Detailed description of "stop play" issue.  Any help out there for this?

    I have four music players that we switch between using during massages in our two treatment rooms. Two are iPod shuffles and two are Sandisk Clip MP3 players. Sometimes the iPod will go all day without a problem. Sometimes, 15 minutes into an hour lo

  • Adding xml or other files

    hello i was woundering at the moment my website only has flash objects like navigation bar and ive just madea post saying il pay 20 pound for people to fix my errors but while i wait for people to reply to that. i was woundering, on my flash site i w

  • OTA update finally on it's way

    Is this true? The announcement seems genuine for me. http://www.droid-life.com/2011/12/08/droid-bionic-update-finally-on-the-way-here-is-your-massive-bug-fixer/

  • Iphoto is missing and I don't know where it went.

    My iphoto is missing from my computer. I went to click on it tonight and it had a question mark on it and would not open. I couldn't find it in my applications. My husband has been using my macbook some but he promises he hasn't messed with it. Where