SGE2000/P Static Routing (equals L2+) Explain?

What does L2+ mean? I realize these aren't L3 switches with SVI capabilities, so what is the purpose of configuring static routes if there is no InterVLAN routing capability?
T.I.A.,
Chris

Welcome to Cisco Community!
With out getting into a huge discussion I will try to answer as quickly and directly as possible.
Our SFE and SGE series switches are Layer 3 switches (can also be configured as L2) so they are able to perform as a (inter VLAN) router or gateway for all VLANs. Once you have created the VLANs and assigned each an IP address, that IP address will become the GW for that VLAN. Under Routing you will not see any learned networks until you assign the VLAN to a port and the port becomes active. You will then need to configure a default route to send the traffic out to the cloud. The router will need to belong to the same VLAN as the switch. So if the switch has an IP address of 172.16.30.1/24, the router will have an IP of 172.16.30.254/24 for example. The route would read like this: 0.0.0.0/0 next hop 172.16.30.254 metric 2 (or higher).
As for static routes as a L2 or L3 switch, they would be useful when you have a device attached to another switch which is disjoined from your typical network on the local switch. In other words, lets say you have 3 (aside from default native VLAN 1) VLANs V10 - 30. All you of your devices belong to these VLANs but you have a server on VLAN 30 which is not connected to this switch. You will then create a static route for that server's IP address to the remote switch.
VLAN30: 172.16.30.1 (local SGE)
Server: 172.16.30.200 (on remote switch)
Remote Switch: 192.168.20.1 (remote SGE)
VLAN30: 172.16.30.2 (on remote SGE)
Static Route:
destination 172.16.30.200 next hop 172.16.30.2 metric 2
I hope this answers your question. These are really my favorite switches, as I find them very reliable and highly configurable. I love these things.

Similar Messages

Load balancing by equal cost Static Routes

Hello All,
I have 2 WAN links for Internet connectivity and I want to load balance IP traffic on both links. If I use 2 default routes like this,
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial 0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 serial 1
then its enough to achieve load balancing or I have to configure following interface configuration command.
(config-int)# ip load-sharing per-packet
Kindly advice.
Regards,
Mujeeb

hi ankurbhasin. I have one doubt pertaining to per-packet load-sharing. In order to connect my two remote sites- A & B, Site A is having two WAN links and Site B is having two WAN links - one from ISP1 (30Mbps link) and the other from ISP2 (50Mbps link). I am doing static route load balancing using same AD values for both the ISPs. I have configured "ip load-sharing per-packet" on both the outgoing interfaces.
The load is getting distributed equally across both the links but total bandwidth utilization across both the links is not going beyond 30Mbps. The combined bandwidth of both links is 80Mbps (50+30). However links are not getting fully utilized even though heavy load is there on the links. Can you please tell me how to make full use of both the wan links at both the ends?

Is it possible in IOS to have two static routes for the same subnet, one a higher priority and "failover" between the 2?

Hi All
Is it possible in IOS to have for a particular subnet:
a) Two static routes?
b) Make one static route a higher priority than the other?
c) If one static router "goes down", failover to the lower priority static route?
We have a l2tp/vpdn connection to a supplier which can be accessed via two vlans/routes. I would like to make one route the preferred one but the "route" to failover if the preferred route goes down.
Again, many thanks in advance for all responses!
Thanks
John

Hi John,
Hope the below explaination will help you...
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
If you notice the Administrative Distance for the secondary route pointing to ISP2 is increased to 10 so that it becomes the backup link.
The above configuration with just two floating static routes partially accomplishes our requirement as it will work only in the scenario where the routers interfaces connected to the WAN link are in up/down or down/down status. But in a lot of situations we see that even though the links remain up but we are not able to reach the gateway, this usually happens when the issue is at the ISP side.
In such scenarios, IP SLAs becomes an engineer's best friend. With around six additional IOS commands we can have a more reliable automatic failover environment.
Using IP SLA the Cisco IOS gets the ability to use Internet Control Message Protocol (ICMP) pings to identify when a WAN link goes down at the remote end and hence allows the initiation of a backup connection from an alternative port. The Reliable Static Routing Backup using Object Tracking feature can ensure reliable backup in the case of several catastrophic events, such as Internet circuit failure or peer device failure.
IP SLA is configured to ping a target, such as a publicly routable IP address or a target inside the corporate network or your next-hop IP on the ISP's router. The pings are routed from the primary interface only. Following a sample configuration of IP SLA to generate icmp ping targeted at the ISP1s next-hop IP.
R1(config)# ip sla 1
R1(config)# icmp-echo 2.2.2.2 source-interface FastEthernet0/0
R1(config)# timeout 1000
R1(config)# threshold 2
R1(config)# frequency 3
R1(config)# ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
The above configuration defines and starts an IP SLA probe.
The ICMP Echo probe sends an ICMP Echo packet to next-hop IP 2.2.2.2 every 3 seconds, as defined by the “frequency” parameter.
Timeout sets the amount of time (in milliseconds) for which the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation waits for a response from its request packet.
Threshold sets the rising threshold that generates a reaction event and stores history information for the Cisco IOS IP SLAs operation.
After defining the IP SLA operation our next step is to define an object that tracks the SLA probe. This can be accomplished by using the IOS Track Object as shown below:
R1(config)# track 1 ip sla 1 reachability
The above command will track the state of the IP SLA operation. If there are no ping responses from the next-hop IP the track will go down and it will come up when the ip sla operation starts receiving ping response.
To verify the track status use the use the “show track” command as shown below:
R1# show track
Track 1
IP SLA 1 reachability
Reachability is Down
1 change, last change 00:03:19
Latest operation return code: Unknown
The above output shows that the track status is down. Every IP SLAs operation maintains an operation return-code value. This return code is interpreted by the tracking process. The return code may return OK, OverThreshold, and several other return codes.
Different operations may have different return-code values, so only values common to all operation types are used. The below table shows the track states as per the IP SLA return code.
Tracking
Return Code
Track State
Reachability
OK or over threshold
(all other return codes)
Up
Down
The Last step in the IP SLA Reliable Static Route configuration is to add the “track” statement to the default routes pointing to the ISP routers as shown below:
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 track 1
R1(config)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 3.3.3.3 10
The track number keyword and argument combination specifies that the static route will be installed only if the state of the configured track object is up. Hence if the track status is down the secondary route will be used to forward all the traffic.
Please rate the helpfull posts.
Regards,
Naidu.

Static Routing - WRT54

I am using the Advanced Routing section.
When I initially enter the IP addresses and click Save Settings the assignments work properly.
When I power down my router and repower it, the assignments no longer work. I must SAVE SETTINGS each time after repowering the router for the assignments to take effect.
Is there a solution?
Thanks

Router: Wrt54G V7 WRT54GV7
I'm loosing my static routing once a day. That is, the route shows in the Entry list, but not when I click the "Show Routing table" button, and the particular route is not working.
- I then have to register the route again manually.
- Every time I register a route, it occupies a position in Entry List (1-20), which soon will be full.
- I can not delete entries from the list, once that route is lost.
- Also, when I click "Save Settings" with one of the lost routes selected in "Select set number:" then I'm getting the message "Failed to delete entries"
Apart from this the box is working, but why could they not stick to Linux ???!?!?
I think this is a BUG, and should be fixed with a firmware update. I'm using: Firmware Version: v7.00.4.
I'm having the same problem on 2 equal boxes.
Anyone else with this problem?
Any solution?
Keywords: "Advanced Routing", "Static Routing", "Delete this Entry", "Show Routing table", "Failed to delete entries"

6500 FWSM ipv6 ospf routing equal network cmd

Hi
As I understand there is no "network" cmd in cisco 6500 ipv6 OSPF config, we need to use "ipv6 ospf procid# area #" under interface. I need to config 6500 FWSM to work on OSPF, can anyone help to point out how to configure FWSM ipv6 OSPF? and what are the equal cmds to config OSPF network?
Thanks in advance.
gy

Your configurations are not making much sense.
You have the same vlan interfaces with the same IP addresses on all devices and multiple static routes for 192.168.1.0/24.
This is what you should change -
1) the clients only connect to MSHQ3 so remove all vlan interfaces off all the other switches for the client vlans.
Also remove the server vlan interface off MSHQ3
2) the server vlan only connects to MSHQ4 so remove the server vlan off all other switches and remove all the client vlan interfaces off MSHQ4
3) interconnect all your switches with L3 links because you are routing vlans locally on MSHQ3 and MSHQ4 so there is no need for any L2 links between switches.
Note also in a true routed design MSHQ3 should not connect to MSHQ4 ie. traffic between those devices goes via MSHQ1 and MSHQ2
4) remove all static routes for 192.168.1.0/24 from all devices
5) run OSPF on all devices and only advertise the locally connected subnets off each device.
For the switch interconnects use new IP subnets, don't reuse any of your existing vlan subnets.
If you do all of the above then you have a routed access design with your distribution switches, MSHQ1 and MSHQ2 routing between access layer switches and the router.
If you are trying to achieve something else other than a routed access layer design then please come back and clarify.
But either way what you have now is not good and will not work properly.
Jon

Seeking static route help

After having inserted my own router as the internet gateway router and relegated the Verizon one to be a secondary one that just communicates with the STBs I would like to know if any could explain to me how to set up static routes to be able to access it via a wired connection as I would like to turn of the wireless side of it.
Now have a double NAT'd setup as follows
ONT -> WAN Netgear subnet 192.168.0
Netgear Lan port 1 -> Wan VZ Westell subnet 192.168.1
Moca connections to STBs
Ethernet connections to exposed (Port forwarded) machines
Netgear Lan Port 2 -> Wan Dlink subnet 192.168.3
Dlink Lan port -> 1GB NIC desktop machine 192.168.3.99
From the desktop machine at 192.168.3.99 I want to be able to get to the admin pages of the VZ router at 192.168.1.1 and also to some exposed machines on the 192.168.1 subnet
I'm guessing I need static routes defined at the dlink router at 192.168.3.1 and the netgear router at 192.168.0.1
On paper this looks very simple but I cannot work out what the static routes are meant to say
Any have any hints that would help me out?

Fixed it. once I looked at the Westell logs
Finally realized that the static routes I built were fine and the problem is that I was being blocked at the firewall.
Can't put the router in the DMZ and can't port forward to the the router's lan ip address (192.168.1.1). Allowed remote admin on the router and it works fine - would be nice if the router allowed you to choose some obscure port but I guess it's not really much of a sexurity risk as the router's wan port is inside the private network anyway.

Default static route and Null 0

Hi Everyone,
Need to clear some doubts for below setup
Switch 3550A is connected to Internet Router and has OSPF nei relationship with it.
3550A#                      sh run int fa0/11
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 272 bytes
interface FastEthernet0/11
description OSPF LAN Connection to 2691 Router Interface Fas 0/1
no switchport
ip address 192.168.5.2 255.255.255.254
sh ip route shows
3550A#sh ip route
Gateway of last resort is 192.168.5.3 to network 0.0.0.0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:39:56, FastEthernet0/11
3550A#
All is working fine.
For testing purposes i config below static route on 3550A
ip default-network 192.168.1.0
ip route 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 Null0
After above change
3550A#           sh ip route
Codes: C - connected, S - static, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP
       D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area
       N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2
       E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2
       i - IS-IS, su - IS-IS summary, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2
       ia - IS-IS inter area, * - candidate default, U - per-user static route
       o - ODR, P - periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
S*   192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Null0
O*E2 0.0.0.0/0 [110/1] via 192.168.5.3, 20:38:38, FastEthernet0/11
Now i can not ping to internet as below
3550A#ping 4.2.2.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Success rate is 0 percent (0/5)
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
So in this case Switch is using which IP as source?
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
Extended ping works fine as below
3550A#ping
Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 4.2.2.2
Repeat count [5]:
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]: y
Source address or interface: 192.168.5.2
Type of service [0]:
Set DF bit in IP header? [no]:
Validate reply data? [no]:
Data pattern [0xABCD]:
Loose, Strict, Record, Timestamp, Verbose[none]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.2.2.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.5.2
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/79/80 ms
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
Regards
MAhesh

Hi Mahesh,
When we ping from Switch then source IP is always the Outside interface IP right?
That is correct. By default it is always the outgoing interface on the device unless you specify it differently.
Ping to internet is not working as default network is set to 192.168.1.0 and all request goes to this IP and then it goes to
Null interface right?
That is correct. Null0 can't be used as next-hop.
Second thing to confirm is this ping works because 192.168.5.2 is directly connected to Internet Router interface?
No, that is because 192.168.5.0/30 is NATed. Remember 192.168.x.x address is a private segment and cannot access the Internet unless NAT is used.
HTH
Reza

Advertise implicit-null label for static routes

Hi, I want to ask if there is any way to change the label or stop adveritise label for an static route. Normally LDP advertises an Implicit Null label for directly connected routes. We want to do similar thing for static routes.
We need to do this is because somehow we need to do rate-limit on the PE interface connecting to the core network instead of the interface connecting to CE. As the incoming packets still got labelled, the rate-limit is skipped. So we want to stop the PE creates label for the static routes or advertises them with implicit null label. Thanks in advance.

Calvin,
Bear in mind that if you only enter the "no mpls ldp advertise-label" command, LDP will stop propagating all labels, which might not ba what you want. If you selectively want to propagate certain labels, then you need to also use "mpls advertise label for " as Shivlu suggested.
Regards,

Check for Null in Mediator Static Routing filter

Using Expression Builder for Mediator component how can I check the values for NULL in a particular XML element. In my case the XSD is
<xs:complexType name="OdsCadDataSet">
<xs:choice>
<xs:element name="odsCadCase" type="OdsCadCase" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadEvent" type="OdsCadEvent" minOccurs="0"
maxOccurs="1"/>
<xs:element name="odsCadUnitStatus" type="OdsCadUnitStatus"
minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"/>
</xs:choice>
</xs:complexType>
I want to check in expression builder of mediator whether odsCase, odsCadEvent, odsCadUnitStatus is been processed. I have three static routing for each element and plan to put filter which checks is odsCadCase is null and so forth. How to have this use case.
Thanks
Edited by: user5108636 on 28/06/2010 00:15

helo, i have same problem here...
I have a xsd:choice on request like this:
<message>
<properties>
<property name="tracking.compositeInstanceId" value="80003"/>
<property name="tracking.ecid" value="0000J1MQVAZBDC^5lVg8yZ1DtZWJ000T5r"/>
<property name="transport.http.remoteAddress" value="10.106.17.137"/>
</properties>
<parts>
<part name="request">
<ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
<ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:anoGuia>2011</ns1:anoGuia>
<ns1:numeroGuia>314</ns1:numeroGuia>
<ns1:codigoFatoGerador>6</ns1:codigoFatoGerador>
<ns1:codigoPorte>77011</ns1:codigoPorte>
</ns1:guiaCompensacaoRequest>
<ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoPorte/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaComplementarRequest>
<ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:idPessoa/>
</ns1:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest>
<ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaDividaAtivaRequest>
<ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
<ns1:fatoGerador/>
<ns1:numeroTransacaoInternet/>
</ns1:guiaNormalRequest>
<ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:numeroGuiaPai/>
<ns1:anoGuiaPai/>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:classeEmbarcacao/>
<ns1:codigoAssunto/>
</ns1:guiaReferenciaRequest>
<ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:numeroDebito/>
<ns1:codigoUsuario/>
</ns1:guiaRemanescenteRequest>
<ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
<ns1:codigoEntidade/>
<ns1:dataVencimento/>
<ns1:valorMulta/>
<ns1:percentualDesconto/>
<ns1:percentualAcrescimo/>
</ns1:guiaMultaRequest>
</ns1:parametrosConsultaGuia>
</part>
</parts>
</message>
I tried everything to check if some of the requests are filled but allways mediator returns null:
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaReferenciaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaCompensacao.getGuiaCompensacao"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "$in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaCompensacaoRequest != ''" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaRemanescenteService.getGuiaRemanescente"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaRemanescenteRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaMultaService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaMultaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDividaAtiva.getGuiaDividaAtiva"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDividaAtivaRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaDesarquivamento.getGuiaDesarquivamento"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaDesarquivamentoRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaComplementarService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaComplementarRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>
Atividade03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemonCase "GuiaNormalService.gerarBoleto"
03/06/2011 13:50:42MensagemEvaluation of xpath condition "string-length($in.request/guia:guiaRequest/guia:parametrosConsultaGuia/guia:guiaNormalRequest) > 0" resulted false
<payload>

Problems setting up static routing

HI
I'm having a problem setting up static routing. I keep getting the message "invalid static route". I have an E1550 router and my frimware is up to date. I have tried a few different gateway addresses ie 192.168.1.1, 127.0.0.1 and my router's address on the net, but I keep getting the same message. Has anyone else had this problem and been able to fix it?

I think the E1550 router supports LAN to LAN routing provided that you have two local networks. If you only have a plain modem and the E1550, I believe you can't do Static routing on that type of setup. Found this link that might help: http://kb.linksys.com/Linksys/ukp.aspx?vw=1&docid=12a84336a124498eb5d6f0204b85191e_17589.xml&pid=80&...

Is there a way to add a static route in an Ipod touch ?

I am trying to get the ipod touch to configure correctly for our wireless network.
The wireless side does not provide DNS or DHCP directly . Rather this is done from a different
subnet . This assists to a small extent with our wirless security in that the attacker must also know
routing address and DNS and DHCP addresses to steal web access. In windows or Linux this can be done
by route add (DHCP IP Address) netmask 255.255.255.255 (gateway IP address)
and route add (DNS IP Address) netmask 255.255.255.255 (gateway IP address)
and manually specifying the DNS and DHCP addresses. Even if i manually enter the
the IP address without a simple static route I will not get DNS services across the gateway.
I am no apple expert but route add has been in use since the internet was still on 2 wheels
surely this can still be done ?
Thanks in advance

hi!
have you seen javax.swing.JMenuItem ?
and have a look into
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/uiswing/components/menu.html
:)

Setting up static routing in sa520. Im stuck.

Hello,
I finally got my cisco router and all excited about it i tried to set it up. Everything went fine until i wanted a local machine to get its own IP adress that is reachable from the outside.
Basicly i used static IP setting in the wan/ip4v menu. This worked great and with the router assigning dhcp too all computers.
Now all the local computers has internet connection and they share one ip adress on the outside.
As for where im stuck. I have a xserve with 2 networkcards. It runs a FTP server which we use local but we also have customers needing to reach it from the outside. The local FTP works but im having difficulties assigning a outside IP too it. Our ISP has provided 5 different ipadresses.
I have tried to do this in 2 different ways where the second way is preferable.
first try:
Use the optional port as a second wan. give it the same settings as the first wan got but another ip-adress.
Then connect the xserves outside network card directly too that wan port and use dhcp. This did not work.
second try:
Assign a static routing from the wan2(optional port) too the local ipadress for the xserve.
Can someone elaborate on how this should be done?
Thank you.
Edit:
Later today i will try this firewall rule.
http://bildr.no/view/580301
Basicly i want to forward any connections from wan2 too 192.168.1.33 which is my server. Does that look correct?

Thank you for your quick reply.
Im using version 1.1.21.
Im actully quite sure that its a user problem rather then firmware error. It´s the first time i evern touch a Cisco router and i havn´t done that much networking.
I can show you how i did it on my xserve. Maybe you can elaborate on how i can do it the same way.
    redirect_port
            proto
            tcp
            targetIP
            192.168.1.50
            targetPortRange
            80
            aliasIP
            77.40.XXX.220
            aliasPortRange
            8888
Basicly it says push whatever trafic from ip 77.40.xxx.220 too 192.168.1.50 on the local network.
How can i do the same thing on my cisco router? It´s a NAT ip-forward rule.
Edit:
Screenshot shows what i have been trying.
I have chosen optional wan which is set to use another external IP adress but this does not work. It would be so much easier if i could just type in the external IP adress there and use the same gateway, dns as the main WAN.
Added config aswell.
Thank you.

How do you Redistribution EIGRP into OSPF and maintain a distance of 250 for a static route?

Ok, I have scoured the forums long enough and have to post. The design is below. I moved a firewall to our new data center, which required adding some static routes for VPN connections and broadband backups. To minimize the amount of static routes I redistribute static into EIGRP with a route-map and prefix-list.
My problem is the next part of my network. When the data leaves my 56128's it hits an edge device connecting to our dark fiber. On this edge device I am running OSPF onto the dark fiber, then redistribute some EIGRP subnets into OSPF and again all is well.
Everything works up until the point the redistributed routes hit my RIB at my main data center where I am running IBGP. IBPG is run between our MPLS router and core for all our remote sites. When my backup route from the 56128's hits the cores, it supersedes the BGP route because the AD route O E2 [110/20] is lower than the BGP AD B [200/0]. Given the configuration below what can be done to remedy this? Oh when I redistribute I can only change the AD for the backup routes, all other routes should stay the same.
56128's where my static routes are:
ip route 192.168.101.0/24 192.168.30.77 name firewall 250
router eigrp 65100
redistribute static route-map Static-To-Eigrp
route-map Static-To-Eigrp permit 10
match ip address prefix-list Static2Eigrp
ip prefix-list Static2Eigrp seq 2 permit 192.168.101.0/24
Edge device:
router eigrp 65100
network 172.18.0.5 0.0.0.0
network 172.18.0.32 0.0.0.3
network 172.18.0.36 0.0.0.3
redistribute ospf 65100 metric 2000000 0 255 1 1500
redistribute static metric 200000 0 255 1 1500 route-map STATICS_INTO_EIGRP
passive-interface default
no passive-interface Port-channel11
no passive-interface Port-channel12
eigrp router-id 172.18.0.5
router ospf 65100
router-id 172.18.0.5
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute eigrp 65100 subnets route-map EIGRP_INTO_OSPF
passive-interface default
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/2
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet2/0/1
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet2/0/2
network 172.18.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 5 permit 172.18.0.0/16 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 10 permit 192.168.94.0/29 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 15 permit 192.168.26.32/29 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 20 permit 192.168.30.72/29 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 25 permit 192.168.20.128/25 le 32
ip prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF seq 26 permit 192.168.101.0/24 le 32 <- Backup Route for MPLS Remote Office
route-map EIGRP_INTO_OSPF permit 10
match ip address prefix-list EIGRP_INTO_OSPF

So in the case of a /24. If it were say broken up into /25's? From our remote sites we are using aggregate-address summary-only. Not sure how I would advertise a more specific route via BGP, sorry.
I didnt have this problem until I moved my firewalls. They plugged into the cores where IBGP was running and the static never kicked in unless the bgp route disappeared. I guess I could use my static redistribution for my VPN sites and use statics across the cores for the handful of backup links I have.

Interworking on Static Routing as IGP

Was testing interworking between Vlan over ethernet and FR. As long as my LDP was on static routing, I couldnt reach end-to-end. The moment i configured OSPF as my routing protocol it came up. Can anyone let me know what the reason could be ?

Gautam,
This is actually normal behavior.
Before the label learnt via an LDP peer is coupled to a route in the FIB, the next-hop IP address of the route needs to match one of the interface IP addresses bound to the LDP peer (see below). So basically it will not work without a next IP address.
r2#sh mpls ldp nei
Peer LDP Ident: 3.3.3.3:0; Local LDP Ident 2.2.2.2:0
TCP connection: 3.3.3.3.11004 - 2.2.2.2.646
State: Oper; Msgs sent/rcvd: 27/27; Downstream
Up time: 00:15:07
LDP discovery sources:
Serial3/0, Src IP addr: 192.168.23.3
Addresses bound to peer LDP Ident:
3.3.3.3 192.168.34.3 192.168.23.3 <++++++ the route next hop has to match one of these addresses.
Hope this helps,

IP SLA, Tunnels, and static routes

Here's the scenario: 1 router will have a primary and secondary ISP connection. I set up an SLA to track connectivity on the primary connection. Here are the static routes:
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 12.54.X.X 255.255.255.240 GigabitEthernet0/0 track 10
ip route 12.54.X.Y 255.255.255.255 X.15.115.X track 10
ip route 192.168.32.0 255.255.240.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 192.168.48.0 255.255.252.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 192.168.56.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel55 track 10
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 Tunnel56 254
ip route 12.54.X.X 255.255.255.240 GigabitEthernet0/1 254
ip route 12.54.X.Y 255.255.255.255 X.15.81.X 254
ip route 192.168.32.0 255.255.240.0 Tunnel56 254
ip route 192.168.48.0 255.255.252.0 Tunnel56 254
ip route 192.168.56.0 255.255.255.0 Tunnel56 254
So I shut down the port (gi0/0) belonging to the primary port. At this point, it seemed like it worked fine. The routes shifted over to the backup routes. However, when I re-enabled the port, only two of the routes switched back. The routes pointing to Tunnels stayed on the secondary tunnel. When I browsed my static routes, I saw this:
Gateway of last resort is 0.0.0.0 to network 0.0.0.0
S*    0.0.0.0/0 is directly connected, Tunnel56
      12.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
S        12.x.x.16/28 is directly connected, GigabitEthernet0/0
S        12.x.y.20/32 [1/0] via x.15.115.x
S     192.168.32.0/20 is directly connected, Tunnel56
S     192.168.48.0/22 is directly connected, Tunnel56
S     192.168.56.0/24 is directly connected, Tunnel56
Is there something special I need to do for Tunnels to allow the Tunnel routes to switch back automatically?

Hello Ken,
I can see you are sending the probe packets to the same object ( using the track ID 10 )
After you bring the interface tunnel up, can you confirm if you can send traffic to that object?
Regards,
Julio

SGE2000/P Static Routing (equals L2+) Explain?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for