Shake 4.1 and FCP Campatability

I know that Shake 4.1 and FCP 5 provide full integration but does this same integration exist with FCP 4.5?

no.
You have to do it yourself. Export the files from FCP, create your script, render from Shake, import into FCP. Not too hard, I did it for years before Shake4 and FCS5, but it's so much nicer now.
Patrick

Similar Messages

Shake 4.0 and New PB 17

I have a PB17 1Ghz 1GBram with FCP and Shake installed. Shake 4.0 is struggling with the 1Ghz PB so I would like to know the performance if there are any users of shake 4.0 and the NEW PB 1.67Ghz. Im thinking of upgrading now but if the performance is poor, then I will wait till the intel based PB arrives. Thanks.

All apps have preferences dtored somewhere. The first place I would look for a third-party preference file is in ~/Library/Preferences (where ~ is your Users/yourusername folder. If it's not there, then look in the /Library/Preferences folder (where / with no ~ is your Macintosh HD or whatever you may have renamed it folder).
I'll check back.
Tuttle

I am unable to open any app on my iphone. While i'm trying to open an app, it just shakes the screen and it does not get open and remains in the same page. It worked fine until I charged the phone in my laptop. Please can anyone help me to recover it?

I am not able to open any app on my iphone. While i'm trying to open an app it just shake the screen and it does not open and remains in the same screen. It worked fine until I charged the phone this evening. After that suddenly I'm facing this. Please can anyone help me to recover this issue? pls!

This is covered in the basics section.
A restore loses nothing.
A restore does. If you are using the iphone as designed, then everything should be on your computer.

Will Final Cut Studio 2 HD and FCP 7 Upgrade load on newest OS?

I have Final Cut Studio HD and an FCP 7 Upgrade on my old system. Looking to buy a new iMac and wondered if I could load Studio 2 and FCP 7 on the newest OS?
Any insight is appreciated!

Forgot to mention, although it will install it isn't officially supported by Apple anymore. Just in case someone jumps in to point it out.
DM

Is it possible to install both FCP7 and FCP X on your hard drive without running into problems?

Is it possible to install both FCP7 and FCP X on your hard drive without running into problems?

Apple recommends separate partitions: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4722

Matrox MX02 Mini and FCP 7...

We have been using the MX02 Mini essentially for HD monitoring and have run across a few issues that have hindered productivity. It appears that one or two of these issues have been fixed in the latest 2.2.1 software release. The following remain. Has anyone experienced the same?
1) Audio scrubbing... audio cannot be heard on a per frame basis, usually audio is heard every three
frames or so.
Apparently this has not been fixed.
2) Audio playback. In the viewer... Hit play... Playback begins but the audio drops out and then
resumes... hit stop and playback repeats the last bit of what was playing before you hit stop.
3) Audio distorts, similar to an analog overdrive sound, when hitting play every 10 times or so.
Most of the projects that we are working with are Apple Pro Res 422 @ 23.98, Audio 48khz/16 bits.
Most of our computers are as described... 2 x 2.26GHz Quad Core Mac Pro running 10.6.6 and FCP 7.0.3.
Hard drives are local external 2TB G-RAIDs with plenty of room. We have check all of our media to make sure that it matches our sequence settings.
I realize that there are Matrox advocates out there, but we seem to have a hard time getting the MX02 Minis to work reliably.
All ideas are welcome. Note that we are working with Matrox support as well.
Thanks,
Scott

1) Audio scrubbing... audio cannot be heard on a per frame basis, usually audio is heard every three frames or so. Apparently this has not been fixed.
Well, that actually is the main thing that was addressed in that update. I didn't have the issue for a while, then I upgraded to snow leopard, and there it was. But that was something with the 2.0 and first 2.1 drivers. But the latest driver that was just released, 2.1.1...fixes that. For a lot of people, me included:
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/132/860478
http://forums.creativecow.net/thread/132/860397
As for the other issues, that are all audio related... they should have been addressed too.
Make sure to update PROPERLY. Uninstall the older drivers, then restart. Install the new drivers... and when the updates erase and then update the firmware, when the computer will shut down, and you need to unplug the MXO2 mini for at least 5 seconds, then plug it back in. Then start up the system.
Shane

New 13" MacBook Pro and FCP Express?

Is the new 13" MBP OK for light video editing with iMovie or FCP Express and little photo editing with Photoshop Elements?
For video I use Panasonic AG-HMC40 AVCCAM HD.
Thanks!

Graphics.
However, as I keep telling everyone, I have an almost prehistoric 2004 G4 eMac (1.25GHz 768MB RAM and 32MB VRAM) which ran and still does run, FCE 4 and FCP 6 perfectly well.
The only minor problem was that the new FxPlug effects did not work, but with 200 other effects there was still plenty to keep anyone happy.
Your setup will not have that problem and even though it isn't the latest iteration it should still be excellent for the job.
Message was edited by: Ian R. Brown

Help with cs3 and fcp -from cs2 and fcp thread..

didnt want to hijack the thread about cs2 and fcp so started a new one
hi, I'm using a proRes 422 file ( mov ) 1920x1080p 23.98fps 16:9. Loads and plays fine in CS3 (custom desktop settings)...but wouldn't mind knowing your project settings for your trial shooternz...so I can compare...
My file is dark and a little flat...so I used levels effect adjustments. However, though it looks way better and exports OK ( hdtv 1920x1080p 24fps) I do see some "noise" now if I freeze the frame...is that common or am I over doing it on the gamma and levels correction ?
I'm just doing hd for the first time really on this machine, trying to figure out what I need in future for machine and upgrade to CS5...so I am going to dissect this file and figure this out til the cows come home so I don't have to deal with problems in future with new machine, etc.
Another thing...I have media info on this saying mpeg-4 ( mov wrapper) video = apcn ..audio = ipcm..
audio 1,536kbps, 1 hz, 16bits, 3 channels, ipcm..
However, there is no sound on the track which loads into audio 4 when video goes on video 1. This was shot with a boom - as I can see a boom shadow in shot during " back to 1 " on the set (when dolly moves back to 1 etc) .... ( sound mixer) so it's possible there is in fact NO SOUND embedded in the video file. Is that common to have a soundtrack appear even if it is empty with proRes ?
thanks...Rod

Wow, not too popular a subject ...this....
Got an update from the man who sent me the prores file...and a little info re: his opinion of adobe coming from FCP...I will share it with you all...
If you are going the Adobe route, I would highly recommend that because Premiere CS5 is a really impressive app when it comes to working with footage and editing. I have recently moved over to the Adobe CS5 Suite because Final Cut is good, but it hasn't been updated in a while....and the Mac is a really expensive alternative to a really good PC.
The color space for the clip I sent over was set for Rec709 HD Colorspace which is meant for broadcast, but on a non calibrated monitor, it will look dark. It usually requires a gamma shift and color treatment (since the clip is uncorrected), but it sounds like you are on your way.
Given the RED work flow, we always shoot raw and make the adjustments prior to rendering. The main reason we use the Adobe Suite is because you can work natively with any footage in the digital work flow.....FCP requires you to transcode everything into a Pro-Res Quicktime and you lose all of the really granular ability to treat the footage in order to get through the edit and color grade.
sooo, new computer will have a broadcast monitor ( just in case one is needed )...
I adjusted my clip by eye, plus vectorgraph etc, (levels and gamma) and it turned out fine...
Rod

FCP 7 and FCP-X on same partition: what problems are caused?

I'm trying to figure out if the performance issues I'm having with FCP-X can be remedied, or if the problem is just buggy software. Apparently, even a newer, faster, more powerful Mac is not the answer, as I read complaints from people with new, suped-up Mac Pros who say the software slows to a crawl. Sounds familiar to me, but I'm on iMacs and a MacBook Pro -- all my Macs are 3-4 years old, and are from that Core 2 Duo era, not Quad Core processors. All my Macs are maxed out at 4 GB or RAM. So I'm certain new machines are in my future. But judging from what some people say about their newer, faster machines, I'm not entirely convinced that it would solve the problem I'm having with FCP-X.
There are numerous threads here reporting sluggish performance (perpetual spinning beach balls) relating to a memory leak or a problem relating to FCP-X's usage of memory (some say it happens worse in Lion). Is that the problem? And if it is, why hasn't Apple addressed it?
Then there is this matter of having FCP-7 (FCP Studio) and FCP-X installed on the same partition. Apple's "Best Practices" article clearly states that it's best to have the two applications installed on separate partitions. Only problem (for me) is, I already had FCP-7 installed on the primary partition. When I purchased FCP-X (the day it first became available), I hadn't read that article, so naturally, the software got installed...you guessed it...on the primary partition. And yes, I could uninstall FCP-7 (FCP Studio), create a new partition, and then re-install it. But I remember how long it took to install FCP Studio (about 4 hours, as I recall), so I've put off the ordeal of heading down that road.
So I'm wondering.......
What problems are known to occur as a result of having FCP-7 and FCP-X installed on the same partition? Would my sluggish performance be related to this? Or would going to the trouble of uninstalling FCP-7, re-partitioning, then re-installing FCP-7 (FCP Studio) into its own play space, only be a waste of time?
What evidence is there that this co-install is the culprit causing sluggish performance?
What ARE the problems that the co-install causes? I've never heard anyone address this specifically.

When FCP X first came out, Apple recommended keeping FCS 3 on a separate partition, so I did that.
Recently I did a clean reinstall or Lion and installed FCS 3 as normal, followed by FCP X 10.0.3.
During the FCP X install, FCP 7 was moved to a new folder called Final Cut Studio.
'Studio' and FCP X now work happily on the same partition - but I have not tried opening both at the same time!
Just now, both applications are the most stable they have ever been.
These are my standard tips for improving performance:
First, check the spec of your iMac against the system requirements:
http://www.apple.com/finalcutpro/specs/
Particularly your graphics card. If it's listed here, it's not suitable:
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4664
If you are getting crashes, there is some conflict on the OS. Create a new (admin) user account on your system and use FCP X from there - if it runs a lot better, there's a conflict and a clean install would be recommended.
Other ways to improve performance:
Keep projects to 20 mins or less. If you have a long project, work on 20 min sections then paste these into a final project for export.
Create Optimised media - most camera native files are highly compressed and need a great deal of processor power to play back - particularly if you add titles, filters or effects. ProRes 422 takes up much more hard drive space but is very lightly compressed. It edits and plays back superbly.
Hide Waveforms at all times when you don't need them (both in Browser and Storyline / Timeline). They take up a lot of processor power.
Create folders in the Project and Events libraries and put any projects you are not working on currently, in those folders. This will help a lot.
Move your Projects and Events to an external HD (make sure it's formatted OS Extended - with journaled on or off) and run from there.
Contrary to what Ian said above, the biggest single improvement I saw in performance was when I upgraded the RAM from 8 GB to 16.
Andy

Last tiger and fcp: cannot export back to mini dv

we used to be able with old Mac Os and fcp to reexport to mini dv, wether on our jvc super vhs, or sony and panasoni cameras. we just are not able to do it now; anybody has a solution?

Check your firewire cable. shouldnt be any difference between printing to video on 4.5 or 5. Or perhaps its something else. I am honestly aware of many problems I and some others are having with Tiger / FCP 5, this is not one of them that I'm aware of.
PS Welcome to discussions!!!

Connectivity and FCP

Up to this point in my FCP experience, I have used nothing but Log and Capture with my Canon NTSC ZR60 mini cassette camcorder which has worked great with FCP. I am on the verge of purchasing a new Canon HD camcorder and am worried about connectivity issues using Log and Transfer. The new Canon camcorder I am looking at says this about connectivity: "USB|HDMI". Will this work with Log and Transfer in FCP 7.0.3? In addition, the camcorder has 8 gb of Flash Memory. Not sure how that translates into video time? Is upgrading to 32 gb of Flash Memory worth the expense?

Thank you, Russ. I have watched Shane's tutorial:
Tapeless Workflow with Final Cut Pro 7
and found it very helpful. The reason for my concern was I thought I read in one of the FCP threads that one had to use Firewire for the transfer but it is not listed in the Connectivity for the camcorder I am looking at. Yes, the camcorder does have removeable media storage. Is that my work around concerning Firewire and FCP?

General workflow between FCS and FCP question....

Hey all.
I'm totally new to FCS, and while in a few hours I've figured out a lot about how it works, what is totally eluding me is how to establish an efficient work flow back and forth between FCS and FCP...it's really driving me crazy.
Yeah, I know, read the manual...but nothing I'm finding anywhere seems to be a really direct, straight-up description of how to get a FCP project up and running.
Specifically I am dealing with the whole "checking out" a project thing, creating proxies, etc., it just feels very awkward. The test project I'm working with has 1 (ONE!) clip (granted a 28GB HD clip)...but FCS is not allowing me to make a proxy into the cache, this is after I already took that clip into FCP, cut it, saved it, checked it back into FCS just to make sure I got the basics of flowing back and forth down.
I wish I could be more specific, but I really really really just want a basic explanation of how to use the FCS as, you know, a server.
Anyone who can point me in that direction is a GOD!
thanks,
Mark

Hi Mark,
Here are the specific sections of the manual that should give you the best explanation regarding the Check out/in workflow for FCP projects in Final Cut Server:
Check out:
http://documentation.apple.com/en/finalcutserver/usermanual/#chapter=7%26section =5
Editing:
http://documentation.apple.com/en/finalcutserver/usermanual/#chapter=7%26section =6
Check in:
http://documentation.apple.com/en/finalcutserver/usermanual/#chapter=7%26section =7
-Daniel

Best way to work between Motion and FCP

I use Motion on occasion but always seem to run into a problem when I export projects to .mov files and import into FCP as the same. The files always show up in FCP but if I return back to Motion to edit the Motion Project I get an alert that say that file is in use. Should I just import the whole .motn file into and FCP and render after or is there a better way? Any ideas would be helpful.

Hi Buck,
if you export your motion project as a mov file you create an independent file with properties selected prior export. That file becomes independent from all applications and will remain even if you delete the project it originated from. On the contrary, if you import a Motion Project into FCP it will always depend on and reference its native editor.
If you are using a previously exported mov file within both Motion (say you re-imported it, apply changes and try to save it with same name) and FCP at the same time then you may get the warning that the file is in use.
Any change you make in Motion to your .motn project should update within FCP timeline instantly.
Luca

Quicktime 7.0.3 and FCP 4.5

Are there major issues with these two? I am on 10.3.9 OS
FCP has been acting a little weird since installing QT 7.0.3. It's harder to make exact cuts in the timeline among other issues.

Yes...there are major issues. Do not use QT 7, 10.3.9 and FCP 4.5. VERY FEW people have gotten it to work right. If you go to Tiger, QT 7 and FCP 4.5, you might have better luck (might) but best to stick with QT 6.5 with FCP 4.5.
A few peole might say "hey, but it works for me," but those people are dwarfed by that ones that it doesn't work for.
http://forums.creativecow.net/cgi-bin/newreadpost.cgi?forumid=8&postid=868910&pview=t#head

How can I uninstall Shake 4.1 and reinstall?

How can I unistall Shake 4.1 and reinstall...The tutorial is not responding as it is supposed to. Screens are different than in book and items just aren't there; for instance "little_guys" in tutorial 2 shows a black rectangle above 'mitosis'node and the city landscape node. I checked under 'pixels' and found that they were all "0" (black). No matter what I try there is no picture associated with the nodes in tutorial 2. I want to erase all traces of Shake in my computer and reinstall. I believe the problem occured when I installed Shake Documentation on my desktop instead of $Home/nreal/ This was because I could find no way to get the tutorial folder into the nreal folder. I have been frustrated for days. Even when I get the node tree to appear, it contains no pictures to practice with.HELP?

Put shake folder in trash.
In the Library/Receipts folder drag the Shake.pkg file to trash. Empty trash.
Process does not remove nreal folders.

Shake 4.1 and FCP Campatability

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for