Shaky handheld footage with Date Stamp: Warp Stabilizer keeps failing.

I suspect it's because the Date Stamp doesn't move while the camera shakes. WS has failed, despite trying a mix of options. Any advice?
Is WS likely to even work when footage is shaky but the Date Stamp isn't?

Thanks to all for the suggestions.
Steve, You're right...I pretty much knew the answer, but was hoping there was some "magic method" I wasn't aware of. It seldom hurts to ask. The footage is a home-shot heritage interview from the mid-90s, and was brought to me as 1 of 3 chapters on a DVD.. I believe the interviewee may now be deceased, and while the date of the interview could well have been limited to the DVD label and insert, this was obviously a home-spun project. I'm simply trying to remove some of the flaws, e.g. camera shake and weak audio, as the customer is distributing it to a number of family members.
Songline, your description is what I expected to happen, and, in one of my attempts, did exactly as you describe.
Richard, What I ended up doing was to stabilize the footage (No Motion, Position, Stabilize-Crop-Auto Scale) then in "Motion", Position and Scale up enough to keep the Date Stamp out of frame. (I think that works best, as the original shot was head-to-knees and too wide for an engaging heritage interview). I did a side-by-side comparison with untouched footage for the customer to see and choose which he wants.
It's not perfect, but much more watchable than the original.
Thanks again.

Similar Messages

EEnvelope with Date Stamp

I am using the eEnvelope with Date Stamp to send
secure email attachments. It works great, however, the timestamp that appears on the
envelope has no relationship to the time at which the enve
lope was created. Is this just the way it works or is there a way to make the time appear as the actual time of creation of the envelope?

Hello rgille,
Thank you for your post.
You should know that these forums are specific to the
Acrobat.com website and its set of hosted services, and do
not cover the Acrobat family of desktop products.
Any questions related to the Acrobat family of desktop
products would be best suited in the Acrobat Forums:
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bbeda8b/
Thanks!
Pete

Certificate of Completion with Date Stamp

Greetings,
Is it possible to make a form that will automatcally add a date stamp to it.? Here is the scenario: a user completes a series of questions through an eLearning module. At the end of it, they click on a button/link that takes them to a page that has a PDF in it. The PDF has a fillable form so they enter their name into it and at some point, maybe when they get to the pdp, it is time/date stamped for that user. They print the PDF out and give it to their supervisor.
Make sense?
Maybe it's not possible to get the stamp to be added as soon as they get to the PDF, maybe they have to push a button on the PDF to have it added? I don't know what is possible or if it is possible. We would just like to have some way to get a date stamp onto the PDF. The PDF doesn't have to be downloaded, it only needs to be printed as hardcopy, although having an option to have the PDF emailed to the user might be an option as long as it can only be printed.
Comments, suggestions?

Yes, it's possible, with a bit of JavaScript. You can have the date field automatically populated when the form is first opened or after they enter their name. For the latter, you could add the following script to the Validate event of the name field:
// Get a reference to the date field
var f = getField("date");
if (event.value) {
f.value = util.printd("mm/dd/yyyy", new Date());
} else {
f.value = "";
Replace "date" with the actual name of your date field. You can also use a different date format, but this should get you started. If you want it to populate when the document is opened, it's a bit more complicated, but post again if this is what you want.

Print photos with date stamp on them with a HP 6600

Does anyone know if the HP6600 printer is capable of printing photos with the date stamp on them?

Hello @Joseph_TX ,
Welcome to the HP forums.
I understand that you want to know if a way to configure the HP ePrint.
I would like to help.
Unfortunately there is no way to reconfigure the ePrint.
When you send an email to the printers ePrint address, it will print the body of the email and any attachments.
It will not print the subject line or who the email is from.
Also the ePrint feature will not resize pictures sent.
What you send is what you get.
You can get more control over ePrint with the ePrint app, but I don't believe that will suit your needs.
Please call our Cloud Services at 855-785-2777.
If you live outside the US/Canada Region, please click the link below to get the support number for your region. http://www8.hp.com/us/en/contact-hp/ww-phone-assist.html
Hours:
Mon-Fri. 8am - 11pm, Sat. 9am-8pm - EST
Mon-Fri. 7am - 10pm, Sat. 8am-7pm - CST
Mon-Fri. 6am - 9pm, Sat. 7am-6pm - MST
Mon-Fri. 5am - 8pm, Sat. 6am-5pm - PST
Aardvark1
I work on behalf of HP
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue, it will help others find the solution.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!

Projects Not Opening with Multicam and Warp Stabilizer - "[..\..\src\TickTime.cpp-207]"

Editing a sequence with multiple nested multicam clips and warp stabilizer, if I close Premiere and reopen it, it says "Premiere Pro has encountered an error. [..\..\src\TickTime.cpp-207]" repeatedly until killed by Task Manager. I have restarted the computer, cleared the media cache and deleted preferences. I can import the sequence into another project and continue editing but if I close PPro I have to create another project and import the sequence again or I get the same error. Help!

Hi Kevin!
That is great news. I had a feeling the issue would be gone in the Next PPro. The issue can be easily duplicated by following these steps in CS6:
1) User warp stabilizer on several clips (like maybe 6 or more or so).
2) Take two clips and nest them and sync them for multicam on the same timeline as the stabilized clips (NOTE: these two clips don't actually have to be sync'd...just grab any two clips, stack them on top of each other, highlight them both and right-click and choose "nest", then right-click again and "enable" multicam.
3) Save project. Close project. Re-open project and you'll get the error.
If you do that in the NEXT version, does the error come up? Also, just while I have you...if you go into the settings of Warp Stabilizer, what is the default "method"? Is it still defaulted to "Subspace Warp" or did they smarten up and realize the option "Position, Scale, Rotation" is actually MUCH more effeciet causing less wobble and less cropping of the video 90% of the time? Just curious.
Coltom Media Productions,
I feel your pain. What also stinks is that the error pops up again when you export (or I should say when you queue) up the project into AME. I originally thought the number of continues equalled the number of warps applied but that's not always the case. Although, the more warp stabilizers applied the more times you'll have to hit continue. It often goes in numbers divisible by four. Why do I know all this crazy, useless info...hours and hours of trying to "solve" the issue. Every project I do, every single week has more than 100 clips that are stabilized and multiple multicam sequences so I often have to hit "continue" on the error 300-400 times or more on EVERY project. Can't wait til the next version!
To see more on this issue you can see the original post on it here (note that the staff has recently (and graciously) led the charge to help isolate and resolve the issue):
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/956692?start=40&tstart=0
And then also, it definitely made my "Top 15 list" here:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1179004
Good luck!!!...oh, one more thing...the project will open...you just have to keep hitting continue. Sucks, but again, hopefully it'll be resolved soon.

Rotate File with Date Stamp and Zip

Hey Guys
New to powershell.. Just want to write a simple script to do the following. The file is called D:\test.log
1) Rotate it every night at 12pm (I guess schedule via task manager)
2) Rename it to YYYY-MM-DD-filename.log at that time. Create a new file called test.log so current logging can continue (or just keeps running on that file after rename of file)
3) Zip it. and leave it there..
Can anyone help on how to do so? And also if I want to expand this script to do multiple files (but same rotated file format), that would be helpful (I guess some for each statement ? )
Will run on Windows 2008 R2 Servers..
Appreciate your help!!!

Here is a good place to start:http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/scriptcenter/dd793612.aspx
Look at how to manage dates and how to manage files.
When you have a start and get stuck post back with a specific question.
You can learn to write a script in PowerShell in less than a weekend if you start with the introductory videos.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

RMAN TAG with date stamp

We have daily RMAN backup with TAG FULL_BACKUP. So every day we have backupsets with the same tag. I would like to know if it possible to create some kind dynamic tag with every backup. For example: FULL_BACKUP_11012007
FULL_BACKUP_11022007 ...
We use UNIX AIX and Oracle 10g

Why would anyone use bash on AIX or any other Unix?Agreed for Unix (I use ksh too), but on Linux I use bash, and it works :
$ echo $SHELL
/bin/bash
$ cat back.sh
TAG=FULL_BACKUP_`date +%Y%m%d`
rman target / << EOF
run {
backup database tag $TAG;
EOF
$ ./back.sh
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Thu Nov 1 17:17:55 2007
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: DB102 (DBID=XXXXXXXXX)
RMAN> 2> 3>
Starting backup at 01-NOV-07
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1
channel ORA_DISK_1: sid=211 devtype=DISK
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting full datafile backupset
channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile(s) in backupset
input datafile fno=00001 name=/home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/system01.dbf
input datafile fno=00003 name=/home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/sysaux01.dbf
input datafile fno=00004 name=/home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/users01.dbf
input datafile fno=00006 name=/home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/undotbs02.dbf
channel ORA_DISK_1: starting piece 1 at 01-NOV-07
channel ORA_DISK_1: finished piece 1 at 01-NOV-07
piece handle=/home/oracle/base/flash_recovery_area/DB102/backupset/2007_11_01/o1_mf_nnndf_FULL_BACKUP_20071101_3lmz1qfk_.bkp tag=FULL_BACKUP_20071101 comment=NONE
channel ORA_DISK_1: backup set complete, elapsed time: 00:01:46
Finished backup at 01-NOV-07
Starting Control File Autobackup at 01-NOV-07
piece handle=/home/oracle/base/flash_recovery_area/DB102/autobackup/2007_11_01/o1_mf_n_637521584_3lmz5254_.bkp comment=NONE
Finished Control File Autobackup at 01-NOV-07
RMAN>
Recovery Manager complete.
$ rman target /
Recovery Manager: Release 10.2.0.3.0 - Production on Thu Nov 1 17:19:57 2007
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
connected to target database: DB102 (DBID=XXXXXXXXX)
RMAN> list backup of database;
using target database control file instead of recovery catalog
List of Backup Sets
===================
BS Key Type LV Size       Device Type Elapsed Time Completion Time
15      Full    834.42M    DISK        00:01:38     01-NOV-07
        BP Key: 15   Status: AVAILABLE Compressed: NO Tag: FULL_BACKUP_20071101
        Piece Name: /home/oracle/base/flash_recovery_area/DB102/backupset/2007_11_01/o1_mf_nnndf_FULL_BACKUP_20071101_3lmz1qfk_.bkp
List of Datafiles in backup set 15
File LV Type Ckp SCN    Ckp Time Name
1       Full 2485667575733 01-NOV-07 /home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/system01.dbf
3       Full 2485667575733 01-NOV-07 /home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/sysaux01.dbf
4       Full 2485667575733 01-NOV-07 /home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/users01.dbf
6       Full 2485667575733 01-NOV-07 /home/oracle/base/oradata/db102/undotbs02.dbf
RMAN>

Files with a size over 100mb keeps failing on the download

When I want to download a file which size is over say 100mb i get the message after the download percentage hit 100 that "<filename> could not be saved, because the source file could not be read" it was ok previously, could be the upgrade or a plugin interference???
Please any suggestions?
Thanks in advance
''locking as a dupe -https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/questions/777712 ''

That is usually a problem with the file permissions of the temp folder and the destination folder that you have chosen. You may also have to check your security (anti-virus) software and make sure that it isn't locking files in the %temp% folder.

Warp Stabilizer Causing Jumping?

I am new to Premier Pro but I have messed with it some here and there. I have a video that is taken using a hand held camera and is at times a bit shaky. I attempted to add Warp Stabilizer (using default settings) but when I render the video it has a jumping or flicking motion. If I remove the warp stabilizer it doesn't do this.
Is this a side effect of the stabilization and how do I solve this issue?

Is this a side effect of the stabilization and how do I solve this issue?
It would be called 'Warp De-Stabiliser' if this was meant to happen!
You may need to do some more trial and error testing with your particular footage. Settings.
BTW there is a practical limit to how effective these stabilisers can be.

What is Warp Stabilization File Extension

When I archived my project to an external hard drive the warp stablization was no longer applied to the clips, so it appears I will be to restablize all clips. Where are the data for warp stabilization files stored, what is their extension, and can they be archived with a project?

We use this effect all the time and pass the project file to various computers who each have their own separate copy of the media and there are no issues or need to re-analyze the clips. It was my understanding that it's built into the project file like Jim said because when we apply the effect our project size jumps from under 1mb to sometimes 70mb or more...granted we use a couple hundred of these effects per project which brings into play all new issues (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1278013). But yeah, I've never had to restabilize clips when opening the project on a different computer with a different copy of the media, etc.

The Next Version of Premiere Pro CC - Warp Stabilizer

With the recent post of what's coming in the next version of PPro CC, I was sad to see no mention of Warp Stabilizer. As amazing of an effect as it is, it needs a bit of help. I know there are improvements and fixes that probably weren't mentioned in the post so I'm still holding out hope. We use Warp Stabilizer more than anyone I know. Several hundred times per week. Yes, per week, no exaggeration. Over the last few years, we've built an entire style of shooting around the strengths of this awesome effect that emulates the use of a slider, steadicam and crane all without having to have them. So we've become really familiar with its PROS and CONS.
Here is a short list of SEVEN things that should be addressed with regards to warp stabilizer within Premiere Pro CC to maximize its effectiveness (and yes we did submit multiple Feature Requests for these so far to no avail):
FIrst and foremost and by far MOST IMPORTANT to us - Allow users to create a CUSTOM PRESET with any altered settings that will engage (or begin Analyzing/Stabilizing) automatically when added to a clip!! This is huge. If you double click on Warp Stabilizer with a clip selected, it is applied to that clip and begins the process of stabilizing that clip. However, the vast majority of the time we need to alter the settings of the effect. If we create a custom preset, that's all fine and good, but when we add that to a clip, it does NOT begin stabilizing. Instead you have to manually go into the Effect Controls for each clip and select ANALYZE. Huge waste of time when adding this effect to hundreds of clips. PLEASE FIX!
BUG when saving projects!!! - If this is not a bug, it needs to be fixed because it's awful. - If you have more than one sequence with multiple warp stabilizations added and GPU ACCELERATION IS ENABLED, then after you SAVE a project (or if it auto-saves) when you toggle between the two sequences you are hit with a delay or freeze while the render bar goes from Yellow to Red...and finally back to yellow again. No work can be done during this delay/freeze. The more stabilized clips, the longer the delay. For us, on our larger projects this delay is sometimes 30 seconds to almost a full minute! Once it turns back to yellow, you can toggle between sequences without the delay...but as soon as it saves again...and you toggle between sequences, the delay hits again. If this is a bug, or somehow a result of Premiere Pro's way of CACHING projects after it's saved, then I sincerely hope it's fixed asap. It's awful!
The third is more of a feature request than a fix - Add the ability to set the maximum scale to work WITH the smoothness control so that if you never want your clips to scale more than say 105%, you can set that and have Warp Stabilizer stabilize the clip and adjust the "smoothness" percentage from the default "50%" down to whatever it needs to be in order for that clip to be fully stabilized and scaled to no more than 105%. Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is not possible currently. Right now we have to manually adjust each clip if it is initially scaled too much by dropping down the Smoothness %.
Another great feature would be the ability to manually keyframe the scaling so that if you have a longer clip that starts fairly steady, then needs to be smoothed out a bit more in the middle, before it ends relatively steady again, you can slowly and seamlessly ramp up the stabilization/scaling so that the whole clip doesn't have to be scaled to make up for the misgivings of one portion of the clip.
Minor bug - sometimes when you have extended the length of a clip, the clip needs to be re-analyzed again. However, the "analyze" button is often greyed out. You need to click away from the clip and then click on the clip again to make that button appear again. Nothing big, but still, a small bug.
After Effects Warp Stablizer VFX feature carried over - It would be nice to carry over to Premiere the ability to isolate what in frame is supposed to be stable (sometimes someone nodding their head can trick the effect into thinking that it's the camera shaking). Great to have it in AE, but would be nice to carry over to Premiere Pro CC.
Finally, I've always believed that no matter how cool "Subspace Warp" sounds, it is not as effective as "Position, Scale & Rotation". This SHOULD be the deafult "method" within the Warp's settings. I'd say 95% of the thousands and thousands of clips we've stabilized we ended up switching the "Method" within the settings to "Position, Scale & Rotation" because it either scaled the shot less or created less "wobble" in the resulting stabilized clip. I know everyone shoots differently, and sometimes Subspace Warp is the way to go, but we have stabilized all sorts of shots with great success by simply switching this setting. Granted...if #1 on this list was taken care of we could then easily have this set as our default setting.
Hopefully this list either reaches someone within Adobe that can do something about them or at the very least inspires others to write feature requests and bug fixes as we have. Even resolving #1, #2 and #3 would be HUGE and would save our editors probably 10 hours per week. It's an awesome effect, far better than "smoothcam" on FCP7, it just needs a little love.

CoSA_DaveS wrote:
All good points, thanks for posting.
For #1, you can make this work in AE at least. This tip is from my colleague DanW:
If you make a preset by only selecting the values you change (and not a preset for the whole effect) then it will auto-analyze on apply.
Simplest way: apply WS, make edits, hit UU to reveal changed params, select all "i-beams" in the Timeline, drag them to the Effects & Presets panel.
For #4, you can get manual control over the scaling by setting Framing to Stabilize Only, and then keyframe Additional Scale to taste. At one point we were going to try to automate this, but found automatic scaling to be very subjective as to the best way to handle it.
For #6, Warp Stabilizer will not track areas with zero alpha channel. So you can pre-mask the input to reveal just the parts you want to stabilize. Do this inside a nested sequence, with Warp Stabilizer applied downstream (in the outer sequence). The just-announced masking & tracking capabilities of the next CC version should be handy for this.
-DaveS, Adobe Dynamic Media, Advanced Product Development
Hi DaveS!
Great to hear that you guys are taking a look at this list. Hope it helps make it better. #1, #2, and #3 are by far the biggest time killers for us so hopefully they'll be able to be fixed/resolved within Premiere soon.
Regarding your note about #1: Allowing this functionality within Premiere specifically would be very helpful. Would it be possible to eventually allow Premiere to auto-analyze when a saved custom preset is applied to a clip? I tried it in AE as you suggested, and couldn't figure it out. But realistically we use Warp Stabilizer on so many clips that round tripping literally hundreds of short clips to AE would be just as time consuming as going into the settings in premiere for each one and adjusting the parameters. We usually adjust the method and then adjust the smoothness scale so that it doesn't "Auto-Scale" more than 104%. That's where our #3 suggestion would help. I didn't quite understand how to make a preset of specific changed values. I tried, but couldn't follow DanW's suggestion. Granted, I'm not that great with AE. I really just use it for the Warp VFX's ability to isolate what in frame is stabilized (hope that comes to Premiere one day) and that's about it. And I really only have to do that a couple times per project. Anyway, I'm sure I'm doing DanW's suggestions wrong but regardless, I'm not sure it would save us much time when we have several hundred individual little clips that would all need to be sent to AE. Any hope for adding this auto-analyze functionality (hopefully allowing a custom preset on the whole effect and all it's adjusted parameters) in Premiere CC?
Regarding your note about #4: That is a valid work around for now. I appreciate that thought. Thanks!
Regarding your note about #6: I think I half understand what you described. I'd have to try it. Although, as I said before, the AE way of doing it is ideal and I just hoped that ability to show the tracking points and delete them over time would come to Premiere CC one day. When the next CC comes out I'd love to try this masking method although I think I'll have to claify exactly what you want me to do just to be safe. Is there no hope to port this added functionality that's in AE's Warp VFX over to Premiere's Warp Stabilizer? Again, not the end of the world for us. I'd rather #1, #2 and #3 be addressed inside Premiere Pro CC for now.
Fixing the first 3 on this list would be HUGE time saver for us.
Thanks again DaveS to you and the rest of the Adobe team for looking into this list. Very much appreciated.

EEnvelope date stamp

Hello - In Adobe Acrobat 9 Pro, I'm creating a security
envelope using Acrobat's included "eEnvelope with Date Stamp"
template (template2.pdf). The resulting date stamp is exactly 8
hours ahead of the actual time on my computer's clock (i.e. I
created and emailed the security envelope at 8:30 PM on Jan. 25;
date stamp shows 4:30 AM on Jan. 26). Anyone know how to fix? Thank
you.

Hello rgille,
Thank you for your post.
You should know that these forums are specific to the
Acrobat.com website and its set of hosted services, and do
not cover the Acrobat family of desktop products.
Any questions related to the Acrobat family of desktop
products would be best suited in the Acrobat Forums:
http://www.adobeforums.com/cgi-bin/webx/.3bbeda8b/
Thanks!
Pete

Best way to warp stabilize between premiere cs6 and AE cs6

I have a sequence with many clips, some with different speed (warp stabilizer doesn't work with speed in premiere CS6) whats the best way to stabilize these videos that are in different speeds?
Another question, in CS 5.5 I used the warp stabilizer in 1080P clips on a 720p composition (with fit to composition) this way I warp stabilizer could zoom/crop the video without loosing quality. Now premiere CS6 has warp stabilizer but I can use a 720P sequence with a 1080p video, warp stabilizer won't accept it.So whats the best way to do this in premiere CS6? (to get 1080p video stabilized in 720p sequence) or I can just stabilize in 1080p and export the final video to 720p and I will have the same quality?
Thanks

You can make a new sequence from that 1080p file, stabilize it, nest it, then copy and paste it into your 720p project. This way you won't need to export it beforehand.
I notice this topic is old, but it may help someone.
Best,
Bogdan

Windows 8.1 update with KB2919355 keeps failing

hi,
I'm trying to get my Windows 8.1 updated with KB 2919355 but it keeps failing with error code E0000100.
I've tried tried to resolve using the "clearcompressionflag" tool, but that had no effect. The update will install but after reboot of machine, the update fails.
I'm running 64 bit and the pc is upgraded from Win 7 then Win 8 and finallly Win 8.1.
Please help.
Thanks
Marc

WindowsUpdate.log is here:
Aha. I think we are going to need a previous piece of the CBS.log. This KB2919355 is so huge that it seems to have wrapped the one that you are showing us. I.e. I suspect the most interesting piece of it will reflect what happened to produce
this event (or an earlier one of the same code 0xE0000100)
2014-08-12 16:55:42:109 1060 f54 Report REPORT EVENT: {AF27B9C6-D4EB-4CB5-86C3-1779B31F5941} 2014-08-12 16:53:00:527+0200 1 195 [AU_SCHEDULED_INSTALL_FAILED] 101 {26E2A7EE-34D5-4161-AB79-56625337046F} 207 e0000100 AutomaticUpdates Failure Content Install Installation Failure: Windows failed to install the following update with error 0xe0000100: Windows 8.1 Update for x64-based Systems (KB2919355).
2014-08-12 16:55:42:139 1060 f54 Report CWERReporter::HandleEvents - WER report upload completed with status 0x8
2014-08-12 16:55:42:329 1060 f54 Report WER Report sent: 7.9.9600.17092 0xe0000100(0) 26E2A7EE-34D5-4161-AB79-56625337046F Install 101 Unmanaged
2014-08-12 16:55:42:350 1060 f54 Report CWERReporter finishing event handling. (00000000)
2014-08-12 16:55:56:986 1060 ae4 Driver Matched driver to device PCI\VEN_1002&DEV_9640&SUBSYS_77481462&REV_00
2014-08-12 16:55:57:001 1060 ae4 Driver Status: 0x180200a, ProblemNumber: 00000000
Unless that driver information is enough of a clue to help you devise a workaround? What is that device? You could use WMIC (or Powershell) to find out more.
E.g. try
wmic Path CIM_SystemDevice where (__RelPath like "%Ven_10%") get PartComponent
I'm sure we could find something more specific but that gives you an idea I hope.
You can do a Find in your WindowsUpdate.log for Installation Failure: to see that there is a definite pattern to the failure reports: 4 install errors and 1 download failure then 1 install error and 1 download failure.
So I suspect that the last ones, for the download failure, or even the quick install error is not going to be as interesting as the first of a set of 4. E.g. those later ones may just be the server throwing up its hands and saying: Go
away! (figuratively speaking, of course.)
Of course I may be completely off the mark here with such speculation, so you may prefer to leave it to Darrell to choose what he wants to look at. Thanks for both diagnostics. I think they will help.
Robert Aldwinckle

Is there a way to access Warp Stabilizer's internal data?

Hello,
I have some footages where I pass through a relatively narrow gate with the camera. My footages are typically quite shaky and so far I have been using Warp Stabilizer with great satisfaction. It really works well. However, in these scenes it messes up: it seems to introduce a perturbation in the scale at the instant of passing through the gate (it quickly zooms out for a short instant), which messes up the background (which contains interesting stuff). Is there a way to access the internal data it produces during the analysis to cross-check my assumption, and try to manually correct it?
Thank you very much
Daniel

Hello,
Thank you for your response. I think the 'Preserve scale' option would do the job (if my suspicion is indeed correct). However, it does not exist for me. Do I miss something, or is it another version of PP? I am using Premiere Pro CC, and downloaded the app about a month ago (and I have only this 1 month of experience), so it should be pretty recent.
(It would be nice to have some graphs showing the corrections PremierePro calculated during the analysis, like scale, rotation etc of the camera - but this is for mere curiosity if the 'Preserve scale' did the job I need).
Thank you
Daniel

Shaky handheld footage with Date Stamp: Warp Stabilizer keeps failing.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for