SharePoint 2013 - Incoming email with smtp alias domain

Hi All
I have configured the following for SharePoint 2013 Incoming email.
CA - Incoming email - enabled
Automatic and received mail from all servers
email server display address: 
[email protected]
smtp installed on one SharePoint server and configured with
defautl domain:  spservername.domain.net and alias domain: 
spmail.domainname.net
emails are receiced in SharePoint lists / library are working when incoming email settings using the default local smtp domain (spservername.domainname.net) but not working when using the alias domain (spmail.domainname.net).
Can anyone advice of what I have done wrong or missing in my configuration?
Thanks in advance for your comments or advices
Swanl

trevor
I tried that but that did not work.  I got this error below.  Does that mean I need to create a DNS MX record for spmail.domainname.net to point it to the smtp server
spservername.domain.net
Thanks
Xuan
Swanl
It looks like you have a DNS mis-configuration in this case with regards to how your MX record is configured (if it exists at all).
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

Similar Messages

  • SharePoint 2013 : Incoming Mail with NLB

    I am trying to configure Incoming Email and I have (2) of each WFE & APP Servers
    Based on Q&A link below
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/f9f1d254-0f9e-4eec-a1c7-a94252668680/sharepoint-2013-incoming-mail-with-nlb?forum=sharepointgeneral
    Note that the SPLockJobType will be changed to Job in the December 2013 CU for load balancing purposes.
    http://sharepoint.nauplius.net/2013/08/update-on-incoming-email-job-lock-type-change-between-sharepoint-2010-and-2013/
    It is not recommended to run Incoming Email on more than one SharePoint 2013 server due to a synchronization issue Microsoft identified (hence the job lock type change).
    My question: is the patch part of SharePoint Cumulative Update 15.0.4551.1511 - if not then I will apply it separately (do I apply to all the servers and would I have to run SharePoint Products and Configuration) ?
    Thanks
    Davinder

    The patch is part of the December 2013 CU. You can use Incoming Email in a load balanced or high availability MX/SMTP routing given you have the Dec 2013 CU installed on SharePoint 2013.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Backup Sharepoint 2013 SP1 Farm with SQL 2014 RTM "Always On" using System Center 2012 R2 Data Protection Manager

    Is backing up and Restoring SharePoint 2013 SP1 Farm with SQL 2014 RTM  "Always On" High Availability now supported using "System Center 2012 R2 Data Protection Manager"? 
    I cannot find information anywhere.
    Regards,
    Igor

    This is a DPM supportability issue, I believe. Last I heard, no it was not supported. SharePoint 2013 does not support SQL 2014 until the April 2014 CU. The CU should be out soon, although it appears to have been delayed (usually comes out on Patch Tuesday,
    which was this past Tuesday).
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Track Incoming Emails from a particular domain

    Dear Team,
    My Exchange Domain name is appletree.com and my client domain name is denver.com. We used to receive emails from [email protected] to [email protected] and [email protected] etc.
    In order to track the incoming emails from that particular domain (denver.com) we want to forward a copy of all the emails from denver.com domain to a dedicated email id  [email protected]
    Please let me know how to configure this scenario in Exchange.
    Regards,
    Jithin.

    Hi,Jithin
    some examples
    Get-MessageTrackingLog -server <CasServerName> -resultsize unlimited |where-object {$_.Recipients -like “*@yourDomain.com"}
    Get-MessageTrackingLog -Start "03/29/2011 8:00AM" -End "03/29/2011 5:00PM" -Recipients "*@YourDomain.com" | Select-Object Timestamp,Sender, {$_.recipients}, MessageSubject
    Regards,
    Max Wu

  • SMTP folder, "Badmail" is getting flooded with millions of junk emails- SharePoint 2010 incoming email

    Hi All,
    Need your expert advice and help !
    Incoming e-mail has been successfully configured and working fine on SharePoint 2010.
    Issue: Badmail folder is getting flooded with millions of junk emails. First Queue folder gets them, and then moves them to Badmail folder. Incoming Email has been successfully configured for SharePoint 2010 and SharePoint list is receiving the emails (there
    is a delay, but that is fine!)
    Please help. what other information should i provide to help understand this issue better ?
    Naveed.DG MCITP, MCTS -SharePoint 2010 Administrator "Vote As Helpful" If it helps!!

    What Reverse DNS Lookup does is attempt to validate that the piece of mail came from an IP that belongs to the domain in the EHLO/HELO command - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/233c0fde-7315-479a-a7fb-2e9d00ff73fd.mspx?mfr=true
    So it doesn't directly filter spam (certainly possible to get spam from GMail/Hotmail servers that Reverse DNS Lookup will see as 'valid').
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • Incoming Emails with Blank message body in Outlook 2013 and 2010

    Dear TechNet
    Why Some of the incoming message we received in Outlook  are displayed with blank message body but same message when viewed from Internet browser web  client  or in Blackberry device message body is viewable and also same message is viewable
    in outlook ver 2003 , 2007, 2010 ( without service pack1)
    Above problem of incoming email message with blank message body we are facing to users with outlook2013 and outlook 2010 (with sp1) and when the sender of the email is using  Lotus Notes Client ver 8.5.3
    Request you kindly suggest any setting need to be done in outlook or windows registry to resolve the email messages with blank body.
    Thanks in Advance ............................
    Regards,
    Jayesh
    Mob : 09819375673

    This is commonly seen with an Outlook add-in, such as the AVG add-in. I just ran into it again today. I removed AVG and enabled Windows Defender on a Win8 laptop with Outlook 2013, and that took care of the issue. If you must use AVG, you can disable the
    add-in and then test new emails.
    To disable the AVG add-in, this is one method:
    Important Follow the steps in this section carefully. Serious problems might occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Before you modify it, back up the registry.
          (https://support.microsoft.com/kb/322756/            )    
    in case problems occur.
    To resolve this problem, follow these steps to disable the Avgoutlook.Addin add-in. If the problem is , we recommend that you contact the vendor of the add-in to ask about an updated version of the add-in. 
    Exit Microsoft Outlook if it is running.
    Start Registry Editor.
    In Windows 8
    Press the Windows logo key+R, type regedit in the Open box, and then press Enter.
    In Windows 7, 8 or Windows Vista
    Click Start, type regedit in the Start Search box, and then press Enter.
    Locate and then select the following registry subkey, depending on the type of Office and Windows installations that you have.
    32-bit Office plus 32-bit Windows
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins\avgoutlook.Addin
    64-bit Office plus 64-bit Windows
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins\avgoutlook.Addin
    32-bit Office plus 64-bit Windows
    HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Office\Outlook\Addins\avgoutlook.Addin
    Right-click the LoadBehavior value, and then click Modify.
    Change the Value Data value to 0, and then click
    OK.
    Start Microsoft Outlook.
    Note To re-enable this add-in in Outlook, change the LoadBehavior value to
    3.

  • Sharepoint Incoming Email with .msg attachment,Attachment missing

    Hi
    I have a document library confogured to allow incoming emails.My environment is Moss 2007 sp1. When i send an email with an attachment of type doc or pdf or zip. The attachments are there in the document library.
    If i send an email with a .msg file (outlook 2003) as attachment, the attachment goes missing. I Stopped the Timer service and sent an email and the email was available in the drop folder.If i open the email from the drop folder i can see that my attachment
    is there.Now if i start the Sharepoint timer service the email body is available in the document library but the attachment is Missing. This issue is happening only with attachments of type  .msg.
    Please could you help with this issue.

    This is the default behavior when you email enable a document library.
    If you want to save the original email as well.
    Go to the Document Library Settings
    Followed by Incoming email Settings.
    On the Incoming email settings page in the Email Message section.
    Choose Yes for Save original email? and click
    OK.
    Now if you send any new email with attachment, you will be able to see both the Attachment & original email in the document librabry. Hope that helps.
    -Mukesh

  • Exchange 2013 External Incoming Emails With Large Attachments Disappearing No NDR

    I have a problem I am running Exchange 2013 recently upgraded to service pack one hoping to fix the problem no luck changed the ConnectionTimeouts on the recieve connectors no luck, diasabled certain commands chunking and BinaryMime no luck I can recieve
    large attachements internally and send to external users but no user is able to recieve emails with attachments bigger than 1 MB all formats doc,xlsx,pdf etc and there is no NDR the attachment is either stripped or the email disappears into thin air literary.
    I am about to lose my mind over this. This started a month ago howcan I test at what point between the sender and myself the emails are being filtered all other emails come through as long as the attachments are less than 1 MB.

    Hi Bright,
    Agree with Ed, you should check if there is anything between the internet and your exchange server.
    If there is any update , please post here.
    Best regards,
    Niko Cheng
    TechNet Community Support

  • Exchange 2013 / 2010 coexistence with different public domains

    Currently in my organization
    1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Client Access / Hub Transport
    1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Unified Messaging Server (we also have Lync 2013 in the environment)
    1x Exchange 2010 Standard w/SP3 - Mailbox
    In my organization, we have approximately 600 mailboxes - 100 office staff, and 500 field employees using a mixture of Outlook 2007/2010/2013 and various mobile devices. Most of our field employees are in remote locations, several hundred
    miles away. We have no IT staff in any of our field locations.
    We also have two public domains that we use, though we are trying to phase out the old one to unify everything.
    domain-old.com - Used when the company had a different name. All Exchange services are published with this one.
    domain-new.com - Used after the company changed names. The goal is to publish all Exchange services with this one.
    domain.local - Our internal Active Directory domain.
    We use Microsoft Exchange Online Protection for all inbound/outbound email. We publish OWA, ActiveSync, etc. through our Sophos firewall. Also, we have two KEMP LoadMaster appliances that for high availability that we currently use for Lync 2013; they are
    severely underutilized.
    Goals for the Exchange migration
    My primary goal is to introduce high availability into our environment by introducing redundancy on multiple levels. I would like to accomplish this by utilizing Exchange 2013 since we will need to purchase additional licensing anyway. My idea of the
    final topology is:
    2x KEMP LoadMaster appliances providing reverse proxy and load balancing to the CAS servers
    2x Physical servers running Hyper-V, separated physically but in the same AD site. Each one would run:
    1x VM with Exchange 2013 Standard w/SP1 - Client Access
    1x VM with Exchange 2013 Enterprise w/SP1 - Mailbox - Utilizing DAGs for high-availability
    I'd like all the new Exchange services to be published under the domain-new.com domain - such as mail.domain-new.com, mail.domain-new.com/owa, smtp.domain-new.com, etc.
    We have purchased two new physical servers that will be Hyper-V hosts running Server 2012R2. My timeframe to start this project is within the next two weeks, so I'll be running the new Exchange 2013 VMs under Server 2012, not R2 as it won't be supported
    until Exchange 2013 SP3 is released.
    Deployment Plan
    Install Exchange 2013 on new VMs.
    Create CAS Array object.
    Configure Exchange 2013 to publish under the new namespace.
    Perform mailbox moves to 2013 for a small group (1-5 users) at a time. Recreate Outlook profiles and mobile device profiles for that group. Test and move to the next group.
    Once all users are moved to the new namespace, decommission the Exchange 2010 servers.
    Unknowns
    My primary unknown is about the namespaces. All of the guides I have read strictly deal with keeping the existing namespace and having the Exchange 2013 CAS proxy requests to Exchange 2010 for mailboxes still on 2010. This should never be an issue for us
    since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move.
    My question boils down to, is this a supported way to migrate to Exchange 2013? And if so, are there some materials or information to help me perform it this way?

    Hi,
    From the description, you want to install Exchange 2013 in another domain and then migrate from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013. 
    About DAG, all servers in a DAG must be running the same operating system. If there is only one mailbox server, there is no need to deploy DAG.
    About CAS array, we should know that the CAS Array no longer exists in Exchange 2013.
    About the namespace, based on my knowledge, we can introduce a new namespace. Just as what you said "This should never be an issue for us since we'll be using the new domain for each mailbox we move".
    Here are some articles about how to upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013 in the same organization.
    Checklist: Upgrade from Exchange 2010
    Install Exchange 2013 in an Existing Exchange 2010 Organization
    Upgrade from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Belinda
    Belinda Ma
    TechNet Community Support

  • SharePoint 2013 Remote Index with ADFS

    I have two domains: A and B, each with its own SharePoint 2013 farm. I have established ADFS for the users and Farm trust as well. Users from domain A can access sites in Farm B, even when granted access through AD groups. I have also setup remote search
    and search results from sites in Farm B appear in Farm A, but only if I grant permissions directly to the searching users. If not, the logs state access was denied and no remote results are returned. Any ideas?

    Hi,
    Please understand that Search requires windows authentication to be selected on at least one zone in the web application. If we only have ADFS configured currently, we will receive Access denied when crawl web application.
    As workaround, we could extend the web application to one zone other than default zone, and configure windows authentication for that zone. Please refer to the detail step in the article below:
    http://sharepointobservations.wordpress.com/2013/08/06/sharepoint-2013-configuring-search-to-crawl-web-applications-using-claims-and-adfs-2-0/
    Regards,
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected] .
    Rebecca Tu
    TechNet Community Support

  • SharePoint 2013 GetPermissionCollection() Asserts with 401: Unauthorized

    Good afternoon all;
    I am calling the GetPermissionCollection() web service function and passing in user credentials for a user with Full Control.
    I get the same assert if I set UseDefaultCredentials to true.
    The call is asserting with the following message: "The request failed with HTTP status 401: Unauthorized."
    If I call the same web service function on a SharePoint 2010 server, the request does not assert.
    I have looked at the permissions on SharePoint 2013 and don't see anything specific to this issue.
    Let me know if I need to provide more info.

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you want to use GetPermissionCollection() but get 401: Unauthorized error.
    Please make sure you at least have full control permission.
    The issue should be caused by that the client application is not the same domain with the SharePoint farm, or the credential passed is invalid.
    Here is a similar thread for your reference:
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/14740b0b-29f8-4742-8631-9bdcd93db4bc/permissionsgetpermissioncollection-throws-the-request-failed-with-http-status-401-unauthorized?forum=sharepointgeneralprevious
    In addition, this indicates that Anonymous access has been disabled for the Webservice.
    We can resolve this issue by either of the following ways:
    1. Enabling Anonymous Access in the IIS Directory Security
    2. Programattically assigning the Credential Cache
    More information:
    ASP.NET Webservices: "The request failed with HTTP status 401: Access Denied." Error
    Thanks,
    Linda Li                
    Forum Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
    [email protected]
    Linda Li
    TechNet Community Support

  • Sharepoint 2013 outgoing email Office365

    We use Office365 for email, and Sharepoint 2013 is on premises.
    We have the SMTP server setup and configured, the problem is that with Profile Synchronization in SP2013, Sharepoint seems to be using all of the users individual email accounts to send alert and workflow emails... so Office365 is rejecting a lot of our
    emails because the users don't have permissions to send as the email we configured in our SMTP.
    Are the options limited to disabling profile sync or granting every user send as permissions for that email address?
    For the time being we have put all users in a group, and granted the sendas permissions for that whole group.
    Any help on finding a better solution would be greatly appreciated.

    In our SMTP we get badmail.
    For example one of these badmail is and NDR from the postmaster to [email protected]  letting UserA  know that their message to UserB could not be delivered.
    From: [email protected]
    To: [email protected]
    Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:57:02 -0700
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
    boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_01CE6D2F3362AF4E00000081SMTPSERVER.companyi"
    X-DSNContext: 7ce717b1 - 1196 - 00000002 - 00000000
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
    This is a MIME-formatted message.
    Portions of this message may be unreadable without a MIME-capable mail program.
    --9B095B5ADSN=_01CE6D2F3362AF4E00000081SMTPSERVER.companyi
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unicode-1-1-utf-7
    This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
    Delivery to the following recipients failed.
    [email protected]
    --9B095B5ADSN=_01CE6D2F3362AF4E00000081SMTPSERVER.companyi
    Content-Type: message/delivery-status
    Reporting-MTA: dns;SMTPSERVER.Company.com
    Received-From-MTA: dns;SPApp
    Arrival-Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:56:56 -0700
    Final-Recipient: rfc822;[email protected]
    Action: failed
    Status: 5.7.1
    Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 5.7.1 Client does not have permissions to send as this sender
    --9B095B5ADSN=_01CE6D2F3362AF4E00000081SMTPSERVER.companyi
    Content-Type: message/rfc822
    Received: from SHAREPOINTServer([IP address]) by SMTPSERVER.Company.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.0.6002.18264);
    Sat, 6 Jul 2013 08:56:56 -0700
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    From: "User A" <[email protected]>
    To: [email protected]
    Reply-To: "User A" <[email protected]>
    Date: 6 Jul 2013 08:56:56 -0700
    Subject: User A has invited you to 'Engineering'
    Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
    Return-Path: [email protected]
    Message-ID: <[email protected]>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Jul 2013 15:56:56.0077 (UTC) FILETIME=[70A793D0:01CE7A61]

  • How to properly create and configure SharePoint 2013 Search service with PowerShell?

    Hello Forum,
    I have installed SharePoint 2013 across three tier servers:
    WFE Server  (Of course, SharePoint is installed here. Bsically this is just a Web server)
    APP Server  (Of course, SharePoint is installed here + Central Admin + Service Apps).
    SQL Server  
    I now want to create and configure the Search service, obviously on the APP Server, But of course the search functionality should work correctly on the WFE server to.
    I want to do this via a proper PowerShell script. I found Spence Harbar's script on: (http://www.harbar.net/articles/sp2013mt.aspx), But it has three problems, and they are as follows:
    1) Spence Harbar himself literally stated on his article that this script is for: "deploying on a single server farm", But what if I have three tier servers? Could anyone please help me out in suggesting the required tweaks in the
    script?
    2) By default Search uses the SP_Farm account, So, How can I change the script to use other dedicated account for the search service e.g. SP_SearchAcc ?
    3) How can I modify the script to specify a default Search center?
    4) Apart from all the three aforementioned point - Is the script missing anything? 
    I would greatly appreciate your inputs - Thanks !

    the only differences are where you place the components.  if you are doing a small server farm with a 1-1-1, most likely you just need to change the script so that you set the index and query processing component on the front end, but the others on
    the app server.  just a 2 second update... just keep in mind this will work, but I am making several assumptions without any knowledge of your farm, users, capabilities. 
    generally, there would be more of a breakout on the topology than that, but im guessing for this farm that you wont have dedicated search servers.  also, a lot depends on # users (rps really), # items in index, size of VMs (RAM for query processing,
    Disk for index, etc, etc), and making sure the topology works for your particular environment and needs. 
    if you want more detailed topology help, which aligns as closely as possible to "best practices" (not that those exist in SharePoint, go ahead and provide the total # users, average/peak RPS for search, current index size, content source types,
    VM specs RAM, CPU, #/Size of drives, HA concerns/priority (obviously isn't, since only 1-1-1)
    Christopher Webb | MCM: SharePoint 2010 | MCSM: SharePoint Charter | MCT | http://christophermichaelwebb.com

  • Sharepoint 2013 SSRS Interaction with Sql Server 2012 Reporting Services connecting to Sql Server 2008 R2 database

    Hi
    I'm working on upgrading sharepoint 2010 to sharepoint 2013 with sql server 2008 r2. I've ran into some problems but have been able to get a test farm upgraded. However to run SSRS 2013 it seems Sql Server 2012 Reporting Services are required. Upgrading
    to a full sql server 2012 database isn't an option. I know that sql server 2012 reporting services can use sql server 2008 r2 as a catalog and content database so I was wondering could this be a workaround? Importantly would I need a separate machine/virtual
    machine to host sql server 2012 reporting services? or could it live on the sql server 2008 r2 machine? Any pointers appreciated. Thanks Dan

    Remember that SSRS must be deployed on the SharePoint server. Having said that, yes you can install SSRS 2012 SP1 on a server running SQL 2008 R2. And yes, you can use 2008 R2 as your Database Engine server while SSRS 2012 SP1 runs on the SharePoint server.
    Trevor Seward
    Follow or contact me at...
    &nbsp&nbsp
    This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

  • SharePoint 2013 Environment Setup with minimum resource

    Hi,
    Could you please advise considering below scenario
    - What would be the minimum resources in order to setup SP2013 Enterprise environment?
    - If we want to buy a single server from DELL as a host for all virtual machines as below, what would be the configuration for that server?
    - How much RAM do we need for the host?
    - How much ram / processor core allocation do we need for the VMs. 
    Requirments:
    USER: 500 Users
    Features : All OOB features / Services will be used in SharePoint 2013 Farm
    Web Application : 3 Web Application, 10 Site Collection
    Total Content : 100 GB
    Virtual Box for entire SP2013 Environment Setup:
    - SQL Server 2012 Sp1 Enterprise
    - SQL Clustering / Mirroring
    - SP 2013  Application Server1 (Enterprise)
    - SP Application Server2 
    - SP Application Server3
    - SP Application Server4
    - SP WFE 1
    - SP WFE 2
    - BI Server 1
    - BI Server 2
    - OWA Server 1
    - OWA Server 2
    - Workflow Manager 1
    - Workflow Manager 2
    - TMG Firewall 2010
    - Exchange Server 2010
    - Microsoft Lync Server 2010
    Thanks
    srabon

    It's all here:
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262485%28v=office.15%29.aspx
    Putting that many servers together for a 500 seat company is madness. Go for the text book small farm deployment at most, in reality you'd probably be better off just having three servers total (1 WFE, 1 App, 1 SQL).
    I can't remember how much you should reserve for the hypervisor but if you allocate 1GB for that i think you're ok.
    For a three server deployment you'd probably be ok with 32GB, 8GB for the WFE and App server, 7GB for SQL and one for the hypervisor. 64GB would give you a lot more comfort.
    If you want more options like the enhanced workflows and OWA you'd need servers for each of those as  well.
    You can always overprovision CPUs on the hypervisor but more than 12 Cores would be wasted on a 3 server deployment for 500 users.

Maybe you are looking for

  • What is causing my Mac to crash during the sleep mode?

    Hello! I would to have your help on this situation that i am having for a month or so...  Ok... it started about a month ago, I turned it on and all of the sudden, it shut down, then rebooted on its own... (actually it rebooted like 3 or 4 times befo

  • How do I connect to an SMTP server that requires a username and password?

    Hi, I am currently working on a project for university which requires me to send and receive email. I was until this week able to send mail no problem, but now the SMTP server has been upgraded so that each time a mail is sent it requires the usernam

  • My mic is not sensed by my late 2012 mac mini

    I do not know why or what started this. i have Turtle Beach x12 headsets that have a mic that play back what you say anytime so you can hear yourself better except recently the mic shut off. It says its on, and its impossible to start it. I plugged e

  • Bookmarking with video in Captivate 6

    I'm running into a problem that when I insert an flv video in one slide, if user in our LMS system exits partway through the video, the next time the user starts the training module the system does not bookmark where the user left off in the video, b

  • Pasting text problems

    Hi, I'm trying to paste some MS WORD text into dreamweaver. It's a biograpy sort of document. It had some resume type formatting earlier with boxes. I told the creator of the document to remove this formatting and resend with less formatting (bold, i