SharePoint w/ OneDrive Integration - Content Rules Question

I have set up and configured SharePoint 2013's "Content Rules". I have also tested it, and it is functioning properly. However, I am having an issue (obviously!).
If I am in the web interface of SharePoint 2013, logged into my site, and I upload a file using the "Upload" button, the file is uploaded and sorted 100% perfectly.
If I use OneDrive, however, (mind you, the Drop-off library IS sync'd and that is where I am uploading the docs) the file shows up in the Drop-off library and just "sits there". The Content rules are never applied or ran.
Why!?
If I can get some assistance or recommendations, I would greatly appreciate it!
Thank you

Hi anitsirK06,
Based on my tests, using "Upload one document" dialog of "Drop Off Library" directly to upload one document will trigger the router rule immediately.
When I sync the document from OneDrive to "Drop Off Library", it will trigger the router rule only when I run the timer job "Content Organizer Processing" for this particular web applicaiton, so you can set the proper schedule interval for this
particular web application timer job for solving this issue.
Thanks
Daniel Yang
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

Content rule Content CSS 11 500 question

I have the following question, the port number in a content rule is this the port to witch the content switch forwards or to witch he listens on.
Suppose i have an url www.myname.org
when i receive this on the content switch i want to redirect it to the backend on port 8080. How can i do this.

Frederik,
Your content rule is what we call a Layer 5 Content Rule since it has a HTTP URL field in its matching criteria.
This means the CSS will be listening for traffic that is heading towards VIP Address 10.5.1.1 on port 40918 AND that it matches a certain URL. This URL in your case is "//domain.be/*".
When traffic is initiated to VIP 10.5.1.1, the CSS will use Layer 5 information such as the URL included in the client requests to match the traffic to this content rule.
When you use a browser to access this desired page, your DNS will probably return 10.5.1.1 for domain.be, telling your browser to make a request to VIP 10.5.1.1 and URL "//domain.be/*".
Please take a look at this link for more information.
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/webscale/css/css_820/cntlbgd/contrule.htm#wp1037654
Hope it helps.

SharePoint with OneDrive for Business

Hi, I'm looking for some clarification on how OneDrive works with SharePoint. The person who set up SharePoint is no longer with the company and we do not have expertise on this subject.
We have three SharePoint 2013 servers - a database server, a web server, and a Web Apps server.
OneDrive for Business integration works fine. However, I am now trying to upload some 20+ GB at a time but keep getting the error "there is not enough space on SharePoint. You need an additional x GB to copy these files".
I've checked all the servers and I have sufficient free space on them - storage is presented to vSphere from the SAN.
My question is: how exactly does the data get to its final destination on the database server? Does it go through a C: drive on one of those servers and that's why I'm getting the error message? Is there a specific service I can check to see if it's running
to pinpoint the location of the OneDrive integration?
Thanks in advance.

Did you check for quotas on the MySite Site Collection? By default, I believe it is 100MB. Also, no one file can be greater than 2GB. This is a SharePoint limit.
Trevor Seward
Follow or contact me at...
&nbsp&nbsp
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Microsoft, its employees, or other MVPs.

I am not able to telnet my content rule VIP address

I am not able to telnet my content rule VIP address and port number. But I am able to direct to telnet to service servers, which are added into the content rule set. Can anyone tell me why. I have update the latest WEBOS 5.00 Build 69. The content switch model is 11050. thank you very much .

Is possible one armed and in line in the same content switch ?
Currently I have some content rule are using one armed solution, there is only one rule I need to make the server see the original IP. I guess my question is , can I have this rule use in -line solution only, so I will not have to impact other rules set.
The other question since this content rule's service sever have only one interface only, Can I have this in-line solution go in the content switch and come out content switch in the same server farm switch ? Thank you for all the help.

Importing Process Integration Content

Hi!
I am about to configure SAP PI. The step I executing:
Importing Process Integration Content
Question:
which Process Integration Content do I need when I use SAP NetWeaver 7.0
(PI_Basis_2005_1_700)?
Thank you very much!
regards

Hi!
Thank you!
Unfortunately PI_Basis_2005_1_700 does not solve the problem.
I imported the SAP_Basis component and now I can access to Configuraiton.
Thank you!

Changing the Site URL of a Sharepoint site changes the content type order

Description
Changing the Site URL of a Sharepoint site changes the content type order of all lists that
* contain folder content types
* and have a custom content type order
* where a folder content type is the first content type in order.
Reproducible behaviour
1. Create a Team Site in Sharepoint
2. Create a Task List "Test" on the Team Site
3. Go to List Settings
4. The Content Type order is by default
    a. Task
    b. Summary Task
5. Change the Content Type Order to
    a. Summary Task
    b. Task
6. Go To Site Settings "Title, description and icon"
7. Change the Site Url
8. Go To List "Test" List Settings
9. The Content Type order now is
    a. Task
    b. Summary Task
10. Select "Change New button order and default content type"
11. Here, the Content Type order still is
    a. Summary Task
    b. Task
Is this a bug? Has anyone noticed this behaviour before?
Kind Regards,
Joachim

Hi Joachim,
You are not missing something or doing something wrong. i Hope :). This behavior is reproductible.
The granularity of change is better by Powershell. But by the interface is most user-friendly.
Maybe that's the reason of this behavior.
Gilles Martinez
Twitter
Blog
Please mark as helpful/answer if this resolved your post

Using a content rule for port translation.

If I set up a content rule to grab traffic on a VIP on port 81, can I then send it to a server that is configured for port 80 ?
cheers,
Mike

If I receive a udp packet with the sourse port 123. Can CSS forward this packet to the Server, but replace sourse port to something greater than 1023 ???
As I know CSS doesn't NAT for udp ports less than 1023.

LD416 (Ver4.2.5) specification content-rule

I have localdirector 416 with 4.2.5.
How to define the rules for content load balancing
with https.
First of all, on specification Is it impossible?
As the following
content-rule rule01 depth 1024 "/aaa/"
content-rule rule02 depth 1024 "/bbb/"
virtual 10.1.1.1:443:0:tcp1 is
virtual 10.1.1.1:443:0:tcp:rule01 is
virtual 10.1.1.1:443:0:tcp:rule02 is
bind 10.1.1.1:443:0:tcp 10.1.1.2:443:0:tcp
bind 10.1.1.1:443:0:tcp:rule01 10.1.1.3:443:0:tcp
bind 10.1.1.1:443:0:tcp:rule02 10.1.1.2:443:0:tcp
sticky 10.1.1.1:443:0:tcp 10 ssl

I found the following comments about CSS.
All traffic is encrypted to avoid people to look at it.
So, the CSS does not see and has no way to see the URL.
http://forum.cisco.com/eforum/servlet/NetProf?page=netprof&CommCmd=MB%3Fcmd%3Ddisplay_location%26location%3D.eea6243
Does this correspond to Local Director ?

Content rules issue - request directed to the wrong content

Hi,
We have the following setup;
Requests to www.oursite.com goes to the content rule LB_FD_87. Request to www.oursite.com/water/* goes to the more specific content rule FD/WATER_LB_87. Sometimes, for unexplicable reasons, requests for www.oursite.com/water/* are sent to the content rule LB_FD_87 instead of the more specific rule FD/WATER_LB_87 and the client get a 404 error. Anyone have a clue?
our setup:
dql FD_87
domain www.oursite.com index 1
owner FD
content LB_FD_87
add service W0_FD_3.71
add service W1_FD_3.81
protocol tcp
vip address XXX.XXX.29.87
port 80
balance leastconn
advanced-balance arrowpoint-cookie
active
owner FD_nonbalance
content FD/WATER_LB_87
vip address XXX.XXX.29.87
add service W3_GL_3.160
protocol tcp
port 80
url "/water*" dql FD_87
active
Thanks for your help
Wig

Hi Gilles,
I don't understand your sugestion .
I don't think increasing the flow timeout will help since according to CISCO documentation that will only permit to the flow to stay idle longer.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801ee806.html#wp1013729
CISCO DOC: "Configuring Flow Inactivity Timeouts on Content Rules and Source Groups
Use this feature with a CSS to configure flow inactivity timeout values for TCP and UDP flows on a per content rule and per source group basis. This timeout value is not the frequency with which a CSS reclaims flow resources, but is the time period that must elapse for an idle flow before the CSS marks the flow for cleanup. "
And I am not sure of what you mean by "the CSS it will stop looking into the content to detect if a remapping to a better rule is required" I think you mean that the CSS will look for a another content rule if a content rule does not repond to a request. But our understanding is that a CSS look for the more specific content rule to serve a request and if all the service of that content rule are dead the pacquet is drop not send to a another content rule.
We did test that with spefic and less specific content rule and if the more specific content rule as all is services dead the packet is drop not send to the least specific content rule.
thanks for your interest in our problem
We cannot reproduce this problem but still find the line sporadically in the web server log .

Deploy Integration Content menu cannot be found in Eclipse.

HI,
I m new to Integration and im doing HCI integration from Customer master form ERP to C4C using HCI(Eclipse Kelper).
when i right click on the Project im unable to find the "Deploy Integration Content" menu as shown in the figure.
Can any one suggest me .how get the Menu and
Can u any one provide me step by step procedure for the integration (ERP -C4C using HCI).
Regards,
Prasad

Thanq it was rectified

Can a Sorry server be a content rule?

Hello
I want to direct all my traffic to server A and if that fails I want to send all my traffic to server B. This I can do by directing all traffic to service A and having server B defined as a primarySorryServer. If these two fail I want my SecondarySorry Server to refer to a content rule. Is this possible?
Thanks!

Donagh,
indeed this document is not very clear but we can use it as an example.
There are 2 vips - 10.10.10.10 and 10.10.10.20.
They have a redirect service to send the traffic to 10.10.10.20.
All you have to do in your case, assuming your content rule looks similar to 10.10.10.10 in the example, is add the service redirect as a sorry server to the content rule 10.10.10.10.
What it does is if all your services go down, redirect the traffic to the 2nd content rule 10.10.10.20
Regards,
Gilles.

CS-150-LAN extra content rule disables all access to website

We have a CS-150-LAN Content switch with software version 6.10Build203. Yesterday for no apparent reason we lost connectivity to our website through our CSS. To get around this issue we removed all content rules except for the "everything-else" rule.
owner http://www.acmi.net.au
content AIC
add service acmi-web3
url "//www.acmi.net.au/AIC*"
protocol tcp
port 80
vip address 203.14.59.174
content everything-else
add service acmi-web1
vip address 203.14.59.174
protocol tcp
port 80
active
owner http://www.vceart.com
content everything
add service acmi-web3
vip address 203.14.59.175
protocol tcp
port 80
active
What is happening now is that when l create an addional content rule it then times out all connections to our website http://www.acmi.net.au. If l suspend the additional rule "AIC" the website comes back online. We need these additional content rules for accessing subsites. Please help.
Thanks

Here are the sho service summary and show summmary outputs
Owner Content Rules State Services Service Hits
www.acmi.net.au AIC Suspended acmi-web3 6
everything-else Active acmi-web1 243
acmi-web2 340
www.vceart.com everything Active acmi-web3 23
sec-css-11150# sh service summary
Service Name State Conn Weight Avg State Idx
Load Transitions
acmi-web1 Alive 2 1 2 2 2
acmi-web2 Alive 9 1 23 2 3
acmi-web3 Alive 1 1 17 2 4
The content rule AIC is suspended because if l activate it, it then makes the website www.acmi.net.au unreachable and timesout.
This config was working from day one with the AIC content rule and about another 9 content rules under the owner www.acmi.net.au
If l add the url "/*" command to the content rule "everything-else this also hangs the site www.acmi.net.au

How to access the pre-delivered XI Integration Content for APO ,SCM or CRM

Guys,
Do anyone know how to access the pre-delivered XI Integration Content for APO ,SCM or CRM and load onto the XI server.
Any inputs in this direction is appreciated.
Thanks, -Vara.

Hi VaraPrasad,
you can try:
1. https://websmp204.sap-ag.de/swdc
2. Search for all Categories
3. type: XI content
then unpack and the easiest way is to import with the file system:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a8/5e56006c17e748a68bb3843ed5aab8/content.htm
and you have the content on your XI
Regards,
michal

Content Rule-Based DNS

We have configured the CSS for content rule-based DNS operation for GSLB. The CSS are installed behind a firewall. CSS are configured with private addresses for the services and the VIP. This VIP is translated at the firewall for external access.
In this scenarion, when the CSS receives a DNS query it returns the VIP (private address) and hence the clients can't reach. How can I change it to retun the public address to the user.

you can configure the CSS to return the public ip address.
But internal users that may require to use the private ip address will also receive the public ip address.
To configure the CSS, you need to use dns a-record and therefore use dns zone-based solution instead of rule-based.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/contnetw/ps792/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a00801eebaa.html
Regards,
Gilles.

Sticky sessions across multiple content rules

Hi,
If a client PC initiates two requests which match different content rules on a CSS (first request http port 80 to CSS VIP downloads a small application. This application then sends a second request to the VIP, on tcp port 8085) can sticky rules be configured on the CSS content rules, so that they hit the same destination server, given that both content rules contain the same services, and hence be considered part of the same session?
Thanks

there is no sitcky accros content rules option on the CSS.
But there are solutions to this problem.
First, are you doing anything special with your HTTP content rule ? Like cookies or url inspection ?
If not, you can group the 2 content rules into a single one. You will have 1 Layer3 rule instead of 2 Layer 4 rules.
If you have L5-7 rules [http inspection], the previous solution is not possible.
You will need to maintain 2 rules.
You could then use a 'balance srcip' balancing method on both rules.
This algorithm is deterministic.
The same client will always go to the same server.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Gilles.
Thanks for rating.

SharePoint w/ OneDrive Integration - Content Rules Question

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for