Sharing entities in Designer 6i

I am trying to share entities with different
application systems.
I created a New application system. Created a new entity in it. They opened another entity from an existing application system.
Put a one to many relationship between the two entities. But after running the Database Design Transformer, I found that the foreign key column is not getting pulled in to the new entity. I want to pull the foreign key column in the new table. Please let me know.
null

Wisman,
If this container concerns a subfolder or application system in a versioned repository, you might try to checkout the above container first. If this does not help, please contact Customer Support, this is default functionality of Designer.
Regards, Marc
null

Similar Messages

  • Handling shared objects in designer 10g

    I have 2 application dump that i should import in designer 10g. I had imported the first dump with the help of import option present in Restore menu option these contains 11 applications with its own sharing . Then i restored the second dump in the same manner.The second dump has 16 applicaitons .In the first dump i have two applications let us call it A and B .These A and B 's objects are referenced by applications C AND D in second dump and by some of the applications in the first dump itself .Now the issue is these A and B exists in both the dump, while restoring ,i was compelled to change the name of the application so that i can avoid duplication .In this way iam able to import. Hence , i would like to know if there is any methodology to avoid these duplication.

    yes, and no ....
    If you have versioning enabled, then the import will allow you to bring in the second copy of A and B as "new versions of existing elements". But that would imply that you have defined and implemented your version control processes and decided how were using version control / SCM in this repository. Not a simple thing, so .....
    If you have a non-versioned repository, then sorry NO not during import.
    This is because of the way the export was created. When you export you include a complete consistent set of applications that you want to import somewhere. Designer makes sure that you have ALL the elements you need. Thus you have A and B in both those exports.
    The real answer is to export A, B, C, D, and their friends as a single export file -- if what you really want to do is import them all and preserve the sharing.
    One avenue is to check with the odtug.com group / mailing lists. Someone over there may have written current scripts to do a "replace" of all pointers to A' elements with pointers to A elements (((this was part of Designer 6.0 Echo, but not 6i/9i/10g - sorry)))

  • How do I use Home Sharing to share apps between multiple Apple ID accounts on differect PCs in the same house?

    I purchased an app called "Where's My Water?" on my iTunes account. My iTunes account and iTunes library is set up on my desktop PC. Anyway, my mom wanted the app. She has her iTunes account and library set up on our laptop PC. So, I connected both my desktop and her laptop via Home Sharing by entering my account information on both computer's Home Sharing screens. The app was transferred from my library to her library. When I synced her iPod to her PC, it did not move the app to the iPod. So, I figured I would just manually download it off the app store on her iPod and she wouldn't get charged $0.99 because the app was already in her iTunes library. It turns out when I bought the app on her iPod, it actually took out money from her account. I want to know what went wrong. Why didn't the Home Sharing thing work so she could get the app I bought without having to buy it herself?

    The short answer: because Home Sharing isn't designed for sharing apps, and apps aren't designed to be shared.
    The longer answer:  Think of it like this...
    You download some music in iTunes.  With Home Sharing, another user can listen to it by streaming it over the network.  But the data itself is on your computer.  If you turn off the computer or take it off the network, the other user can't access it.
    But if you send another user the app, they aren't just streaming the data- they installed it on their iOS device.  Because they weren't the one that purchased it, such a transfer could easily be considered "piracy" or "stealing," and nobody likes that (least of all, Apple). 
    When iTunes sees this app, it obviously recognized it, as if saying, "Hey, how did you get this app on your device, if I have no record of you purchasing/downloading it from the iTunes store?"
    post edited to correct spelling errors

  • How can I use home sharing between our iphones (create playlists from both accounts at once)

    How can I use home sharing between our iphones, so that we can create playlists with songs from both of our libraries?  We share a Macbook Pro (separate accounts) and each have the new iphone, but when I have my iphone and try to create a new playlist, I can only grab songs from one account.  Is there a way to create a playlist using both accounts since we are sharing?
    Does it have to be created within iTunes first on our Mac?

    The short answer: because Home Sharing isn't designed for sharing apps, and apps aren't designed to be shared.
    The longer answer:  Think of it like this...
    You download some music in iTunes.  With Home Sharing, another user can listen to it by streaming it over the network.  But the data itself is on your computer.  If you turn off the computer or take it off the network, the other user can't access it.
    But if you send another user the app, they aren't just streaming the data- they installed it on their iOS device.  Because they weren't the one that purchased it, such a transfer could easily be considered "piracy" or "stealing," and nobody likes that (least of all, Apple). 
    When iTunes sees this app, it obviously recognized it, as if saying, "Hey, how did you get this app on your device, if I have no record of you purchasing/downloading it from the iTunes store?"
    post edited to correct spelling errors

  • TS2972 How do I use home sharing to move a movie to another computer

    I am trying to move my digital copy of The hunger games to another computer through home sharing is this posssible?

    The short answer: because Home Sharing isn't designed for sharing apps, and apps aren't designed to be shared.
    The longer answer:  Think of it like this...
    You download some music in iTunes.  With Home Sharing, another user can listen to it by streaming it over the network.  But the data itself is on your computer.  If you turn off the computer or take it off the network, the other user can't access it.
    But if you send another user the app, they aren't just streaming the data- they installed it on their iOS device.  Because they weren't the one that purchased it, such a transfer could easily be considered "piracy" or "stealing," and nobody likes that (least of all, Apple). 
    When iTunes sees this app, it obviously recognized it, as if saying, "Hey, how did you get this app on your device, if I have no record of you purchasing/downloading it from the iTunes store?"
    post edited to correct spelling errors

  • How do you use home sharing to send an album from a pc to an iphone?

    I just got an iphone 5 and am trying to move purchased music from my husband's itunes to my phone.  I've enabled home sharing, the music is on my iphone but will only play when his computer is on and sharing is enabled.  How do I permantley add it to my phone?  Is that allowed??

    The short answer: because Home Sharing isn't designed for sharing apps, and apps aren't designed to be shared.
    The longer answer:  Think of it like this...
    You download some music in iTunes.  With Home Sharing, another user can listen to it by streaming it over the network.  But the data itself is on your computer.  If you turn off the computer or take it off the network, the other user can't access it.
    But if you send another user the app, they aren't just streaming the data- they installed it on their iOS device.  Because they weren't the one that purchased it, such a transfer could easily be considered "piracy" or "stealing," and nobody likes that (least of all, Apple). 
    When iTunes sees this app, it obviously recognized it, as if saying, "Hey, how did you get this app on your device, if I have no record of you purchasing/downloading it from the iTunes store?"
    post edited to correct spelling errors

  • How do I ask home sharing to not copy duplicate files?

    I don't know if there's a good solution for this but here is what's happened to me.
    I got my new iMac a couple of months ago and I dragged my entire iTunes folder on to my new machine. This unfortunately gave me two copies of almost everything somehow so I selected show duplicates and I deleted them. This deleted not only the doubles but also all the songs with the same name even if they were in different albums. For example, a song on a full length album and a the same song on an EP were both deleted.
    So this is what I want. I want to use home sharing to copy the missing songs from my old computer to my new one without bringing over copies of things that are already on the new computer, like when you being to import duplicates into iPhoto and it asks you if you want to import the duplicates or not?
    Is there any way to get iTunes/Homesharing to do this?

    The short answer: because Home Sharing isn't designed for sharing apps, and apps aren't designed to be shared.
    The longer answer:  Think of it like this...
    You download some music in iTunes.  With Home Sharing, another user can listen to it by streaming it over the network.  But the data itself is on your computer.  If you turn off the computer or take it off the network, the other user can't access it.
    But if you send another user the app, they aren't just streaming the data- they installed it on their iOS device.  Because they weren't the one that purchased it, such a transfer could easily be considered "piracy" or "stealing," and nobody likes that (least of all, Apple). 
    When iTunes sees this app, it obviously recognized it, as if saying, "Hey, how did you get this app on your device, if I have no record of you purchasing/downloading it from the iTunes store?"
    post edited to correct spelling errors

  • How do I limit home sharing to my own computer and apple tv

    I have a renter in my home......how Can I use home sharing on my mac and apple tv without the renter having access to my computer

    The short answer: because Home Sharing isn't designed for sharing apps, and apps aren't designed to be shared.
    The longer answer:  Think of it like this...
    You download some music in iTunes.  With Home Sharing, another user can listen to it by streaming it over the network.  But the data itself is on your computer.  If you turn off the computer or take it off the network, the other user can't access it.
    But if you send another user the app, they aren't just streaming the data- they installed it on their iOS device.  Because they weren't the one that purchased it, such a transfer could easily be considered "piracy" or "stealing," and nobody likes that (least of all, Apple). 
    When iTunes sees this app, it obviously recognized it, as if saying, "Hey, how did you get this app on your device, if I have no record of you purchasing/downloading it from the iTunes store?"
    post edited to correct spelling errors

  • Family sharing not sharing payment information

    Family sharing not sharing payment information
    We have two iPhones on iOS 8. Previously my Apple ID was logged into my wife's phone for iTunes and app purchases to share purchases (she's had her own apple is for iCloud all along) . I set up family sharing, on my phone first. I'm the organizer. I invited my wife, switched her Apple ID in settings in iTunes and app purchases to her own Apple ID. Both of us can see we are in the family in iCloud settings. But in the iTunes part it looks like normal, with seperate accounts. If we view purchase in the App Store both accounts are listed (and looks like both accounts show all the same apps that I've purchased previous to setting this up).
    Is that right?
    More importantly when I go to make an iTunes purchase on my wife's phone, it doesn't try to use any shared payment. It wants to update HER credit card on her account.
    My phone says the credit card is shared.
    What setting have I missed here?
    And I keep seeing this question asked but no clear answer. Will she loose access to any apps or music purchased before the family? They all show under her account now. Apple said somewhere that a legacy account would be allowed. I'm afraid to play too much with it after hearing people are getting locked out for a year.
    Thanks for any help!!

    Your purchases will be charged against the Organizer's charge card on file, but they will reside under the Apple ID that you are purchasing them under (so if later, you were to leave Family Sharing, they would be "owned" by your Apple ID). If you have a gift card on file for your Apple ID, it will take the funds from the gift card first before going to the Organizer's charge card, but the entire set-up of Family Sharing is one that is designed to charge all purchases against the Organizer's card on file.
    How is the set-up invasive, exactly? Family Sharing is primarily designed for families, especially ones with small children. The FAQs and ad pages are very clear about the fact that the Organizer pay for all purchases:
    https://www.apple.com/icloud/family-sharing/
    Cheers,
    GB

  • Family sharing not allowing me to make purchases without using my husband's payment method

    My Husband and I recently took the plunge and joined Family Sharing.
    Having pretty hectic lives, we haven't worked it all out as yet - and today, I tried purchasing an App - and all of a sudden I am being required to use my husbands iTunes account and Payment Methods, rather than my own, which I have used for many years.
    We did make my husband the organiser, however, I am on the account as an adult, and find this sudden change invasive and unacceptable.   Nothing in the literature explaining family sharing says that the adult who is not the organiser, can no longer control their own purchases and purchase methods.
    we love the idea of family sharing for photos, movies, apps, books etc ....  However I do not want my purchases and subscription communications to go through to my husband.  We are both busy, independent adults - and although we have nothing to hide from one another, what we each do should be communicated to and controlled by each of us.
    I just called support, and they are telling me that there is nothing they can do about this ?
    Anyone got any advice, or experiences to share ?  TIA

    Your purchases will be charged against the Organizer's charge card on file, but they will reside under the Apple ID that you are purchasing them under (so if later, you were to leave Family Sharing, they would be "owned" by your Apple ID). If you have a gift card on file for your Apple ID, it will take the funds from the gift card first before going to the Organizer's charge card, but the entire set-up of Family Sharing is one that is designed to charge all purchases against the Organizer's card on file.
    How is the set-up invasive, exactly? Family Sharing is primarily designed for families, especially ones with small children. The FAQs and ad pages are very clear about the fact that the Organizer pay for all purchases:
    https://www.apple.com/icloud/family-sharing/
    Cheers,
    GB

  • Automatically send out shared review files from hotfolder?

    Hi - I haven't been able to find an answer so I hope you can help me.
    Basically, I have a group of 10 people who always needs to review PDF files.
    Currently one of them is taking care of sending out for shared review but I would like to eliminate that step as it takes a lot of time.
    Is it possible to automate this process, e.g. by placing PDFs in a hotfolder and have them sent out automatically for these 10 people? Or is there another option that could completely eliminate the need for a person to send them out for shared review?
    Any suggestions are very welcome.
    Regards,
    Filip Jensen

    Hi Filip,
    Unfortunately shared reviews are designed to be a manual process initiated on the desktop.
    Regards,
    Rave

  • Accessing Muse via Screen Sharing has bizarre mouse behavior

    When accessing another Mac using Screen Share... built in to the Finder, I can see Muse, but any attempt to edit a page displays strange mouse behaviour. Specifically, clicks down and up seem to be mis-interpreted as clicks held down by Muse, and only by Muse. Other apps don't show this behaviour. 100% repeatable, and easy to reproduce -- just click on an object and try to move it and you'll see how it's tough to unclick and stop dragging things around. Seems to be specific to Muse.
    Using Lion on local machine, Snow Leopard on remote computer running Muse. Licensed on both locations, just sharing to give design advice.

    See this at MacFixIt.
    ...and 'Google' for, say, "screen sharing black window" and you'll have some suggestions.
    Andreas

  • Oracle 9i Designer/Jdeveloper 9i interaction

    Is it proposed that it will be possible to generate a first-cut
    relational schema (as DD Transformer) from a class model
    captured in the repository from JDeveloper 9i?
    How integrated are the repository object types from the 2 tool
    sets?
    Many thanks,
    Martin Barnes

    Hi,
    In JDeveloper there is a framework called Business Components for Java (BC4J) and this has a concept of Entity Objects which are similar to Entities in Designer.
    Therefore you can use the Class Modeler to draw Entity Objects and their relationships and then generate the table equivalents straight to the database.
    I don't think there are any books covering this as the Class Modeler is making it's first appearance in this release. All I can advise is to download the JDeveloper9i Release Candidate from OTN and have a play with it. There should be plenty of help on BC4J and the Class Modeler.
    Also have a look at JDeveloper on OTN which contains presentations etc at:
    http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/content.html
    If you have any questions about JDeveloper then please use the JDeveloper9i forum and we will try to answer your question.
    Thanks again,
    Lisa

  • Sharing Vodafone 3G USB Modem connection from XP Pro

    Hi,
    I'm a newbie with Mac and am trying to share the connection my XP Pro SP3 laptop has with the Vodafone 3G USB Modem. I've tried ICS on the XP Laptop and no good, I've tried connecting the modem to the Mac and sharing the connection via System Prefs / Network & Sharing but still no good. Any help appreciated.
    I also have a Vonage device (IP Phone) which is currently connected to the XP Laptop ethernet (Connection is shared from the dial up).
    I need to be able to share the single connection with the Mac, Laptop and Vonage.

    USB 3G modems are not designed to be shared they are designed to be used by 1 computer at a time.
    Some people have used software sharing on the mac to share a usb 3g modem connection but had unexpected results.
    You can however get routers that can share 3g modems something like this

  • Double Cost A/c impact of brrow & lent and Intrcompany in same legal entity

    Hello Experts / Dina,
    Could someone please explain me the double cost accounting impact on borrowed and lent process and inter-company accounting in same legal entity scenario?
    Example – Lets say US company X-star running the project on Mobile Apps development in US consulting division (Project Organization) and the resources from marketing division (Expenditure organization) are working on it on developing marketing campaign and decided to share the cost 100%.
    Using Borrow and Lent:-Assume MIS cost is charge of USD 100 on Project Mobile Apps Development. A/c is
    Debit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    Then if you use borrowed and lent accounting method the accounting entries will be generated as
    Debit- cost to US Company –US Consulting (Project Org) – MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD
    Credit- cost to US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    In this case cost on Expenditure organization is totally reverse and cost is only charge to provider organization.
    In Inter-company scenario:- But let say if you are trying to implement the same scenario using inter-company accounting.
    Then MIS cost charge of USD 100 on project will derive the same accounting as mentioned above.
    Debit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    Revenue will generate below accounting.
    Credit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Revenue A/c (Revenue A/c)-100 USD.
    And payables intercompany invoice in provider organization will generate below accounting.
    Debit- cost to US Company –US Consulting (Project Org) – MIS Intercompany Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
    Now the question is why in Inter-company scenario (2nd case example ) the cost of expenditure organization is not reverse similar like in borrow and lent scenario? I guess implementation of intercompany scenario results in double costing for same company (within legal entity).
    But this might look properly when you implement inter-company approach across legal entity as company can report separate expense and (internal-external) revenue across company.
    Similarly like inter-company scenario when you use inter project billing, you end up in creating double costing. Am I right?
    Please let me know whether my understanding is correct?
    Your reply on this will be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    :-)

    Hi
    Here are my responses along side your questions:
    1.With borrow and lent you cannot only cross charge within the same operating unit but also cross charge across operating unit only within same legal entity. Am I right?
    No. Borrow and Lent works only within the same operating unit. This functionality does not involve supplier and customer invoices, only accounting entries. When you cross operating units you must use the intercompany billing process.
    2.On the below example explained below sec 2.1; this perfectly works fine in scenario where organization within legal entities are agree to share the revenue.
    But what if the organizations agreed to share the cost? In that case it should generates the accounting mentioned below in section 2.2. Am I right.?
    2.1>; (Example provided by you- share revenue)
    Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
    Credit org A on "internal Revenue" account
    2.2>;(same Example used by me with diff scenario of sharing the cost)
    Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
    Credit org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
    If so then isn't it nullifying the cost generated by Org A previously.
    2.2.1>;
    Debit Org A on "Labor Cost A/c"
    after generating borrow & lent
    Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
    Credit org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
    Resulting in general ledger module showing the cost on Org B "Internally purchase cost"
    Am I right?
    In my example the credit of the provider organization is on account - Internal revenue. This is not considered as revenue share, since the revenue of org A from its customer agreement is not decreased.
    Internal revenue and internal purchased costs are two accounts that are different from the norma business accounts. When you report in GL for the organization A you will get external revenue of 1000, labor cost of A of 300, and internal purchased cost of 400.  So margin of org A is 1000-300-400 = 300.
    When you report in GL for the organization B you will get internal revenue of 400, labor cost of 370, and org B margin is 400 - 370 = 30.
    When you report in GL for the entire company (summary of bot organizations) you will have - External revenue of 1000, labor cost of 670, and total margin of 330.
    Note the margin of the company is shared by org A -300, and org b - 30.
    To get the report of the total company I did not included the internal trading accounts - the internal purchased cost and the internal revenue.
    In the approach you provided you credited the cost of org B, rather than credit an internal revenue account.  That is also a legitimate approach. However for audit use I could suggest to use a separate account for crediting the costs o org B, and not the same original account of labor A/C.
    3.But lets say now if organization are agreed to share the cost but instead of using borrow and lent, they are agreed to use inter-company functionality then
    accounting entries will result mentioned below.Am I right?
    3.1>;
    Cost - Debit Org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
    Inter-comp Invoice - Debit Org A on "Inter Receivable A/c" account
    Credit Org A on "Inter-revenue A/c" account
    Payables inter invoice - Debit Org B on "internally purchase a/c" account
    The accounting results of both processes could be the same. The difference is the introducing of AP & AR invoices and the need to run payments on both sides. In any case on org A you always debit an account which means internally purchase, cost purchased from another organization.  On org B you always credit an account that could be named internal revenue or cost reimbursement or cost reduction, etc.
    Now my worries are if both the process agrees on same principle of sharing the cost design for
    same purpose then why results in different accounting by finally creating double costing on Org A and Org B as well. Am I not sure whether my understanding is correct. Please help.
    Also mentioned by you earlier..
    "In GL you may want to offset both the internal trade accounts on a balancing value of cost center. So the internal revenue credit will offset the internally purchased cost debit."
    I am not sure how you can offset the internal revenue and cost account for Org A in GL. (is this done manually??) Could you please explain in detail if possible?
    My note about the need to offset in GL is related to the method of reporting. As explained in the example above, when reporting on the entire company you need to omit the internal trade accounts.  The method I use is to set up additional cost center value in GL which is not related to any real organization. This cost center is used for offset entries.
    I take the balance of internal purchased cost from of organizations and create a journal entry of the same amount but negative for the offset cost center.  The same is done for the balance of internal revenue of all cost center. As a result  the total internal purchased cost and the total of internal revenue at company level (accross all cost centers) is zero.  Now you can report on the entire company without the affect of the internal trade.  Those journal entries may be created automatically by allocation rules set up in GL.
    Dina

Maybe you are looking for